auto-summarization: classful vs classless routing protocols
Posted
by
yorble
on Server Fault
See other posts from Server Fault
or by yorble
Published on 2012-10-14T20:49:59Z
Indexed on
2012/10/14
21:39 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 415
ip-routing
|rip
Suppose a router R1 is directly connected to the following subnets:
10.1.0.0/24
10.1.1.0/24
10.1.2.0/24
10.1.3.0/24
If it is running RIPv1, it will advertise:
"i have the network 10.0.0.0" (implicitly understood by receiving RIPv1 routers as 10.0.0.0/8 because the protocol is classful)
but suppose we changed the routing protocol to RIPv2 and turned ON auto-summarization. Would it behave in the same way? Would it advertise:
"i have the network 10.0.0.0" (advertised WITHOUT subnet mask, and implicitly understood by other routers as 10.0.0.0/8)
OR would it auto-summarize in a non classful way like:
"i have 10.1.0.0/22" (advertised as network id and subnet mask pair)
In other words, does turning on auto-summarization in RIPv2 (or other classless routing protocols) cause it to auto-summarize in a classful manner or simply auto-summarize classlessly to the best of its ability?
© Server Fault or respective owner