Is there a work around for slow performance of do.call(cbind.xts,...) in R 2.15.2?

Posted by Petr Matousu on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Petr Matousu
Published on 2012-12-17T22:28:23Z Indexed on 2012/12/17 23:03 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 233

Filed under:

r

|

xts

I would expect cbind.xts and do.call(cbind.xts) to perform with similar elapsed time. That was true for R2.11, R2.14.

For R2.15.2 and xts 0.8-8, the do.call(cbind.xts,...) variant performs drastically slower, which effectively breaks my previous codes.

As Josh Ulrich notes in a comment below, the xts package maintainers are aware of this problem. In the meantime, is there a convenient work around?

Related posts about xts

xts error - order.by requires an appropriate time-based object

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I can not resolve why error in simple creation of xts object xts(rep(0, NROW(TICK.NYSE)), order.by = index(TICK.NYSE)) Error in xts(rep(0, NROW(TICK.NYSE)), order.by = index(TICK.NYSE)) : order.by requires an appropriate time-based object appeared while this was working perfectly 14 days ago… >>> More
endpoints (bug?) behavior in xts

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
If I try to get endpoints for every year, for example, and do the following: xts.data <- xts(1:10000, order.by=seq(from=as.Date("1970-01-01"), by=1, len=10000)) z <- endpoints(xts.data, on="months", k=12) The return value for this is: > z [1] 0 10000 Same with numbers higher than… >>> More
R - Subsetting XTS via Time and Which

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Currently, I have a XTS, called Data, which contains a Date, and two value columns which are numbers. I would like to get a single number as output and which would be the mean of Value1 in the time period from a point where Value2 < mean(Value2) and going forward 14 data points, weeks in this particular… >>> More
Is there a work around for slow performance of do.call(cbind.xts,...) in R 2.15.2?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I would expect cbind.xts and do.call(cbind.xts) to perform with similar elapsed time. That was true for R2.11, R2.14. For R2.15.2 and xts 0.8-8, the do.call(cbind.xts,...) variant performs drastically slower, which effectively breaks my previous codes. As Josh Ulrich notes in a comment below, the… >>> More
AES-XTS implementation in C#

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Is there any implementation of AES-XTS written in C# available in the Internet? Bouncy Castle disappointed me :( I took the source codes of TrueCrypt and FreeOTFE but they are written in C which is very hard for me to understand... Anyone? >>> More

Developer IT

Is there a work around for slow performance of do.call(cbind.xts,...) in R 2.15.2? - Developer IT

Is there a work around for slow performance of do.call(cbind.xts,...) in R 2.15.2?

r

xts

Related posts about r

Related posts about xts

xts error - order.by requires an appropriate time-based object

endpoints (bug?) behavior in xts

R - Subsetting XTS via Time and Which

Is there a work around for slow performance of do.call(cbind.xts,...) in R 2.15.2?

AES-XTS implementation in C#

Categories cloud