Hungry hungry BIOS: why do I have less than 4 GiB of memory?
Posted
by
Rhymoid
on Super User
See other posts from Super User
or by Rhymoid
Published on 2013-10-24T21:22:41Z
Indexed on
2013/10/24
21:58 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 180
I thought I had 4 GiB of memory, but just to be sure, let's ask the BIOS about that:
?: sudo dmidecode --type 20
# dmidecode 2.12
SMBIOS 2.6 present.
Handle 0x000B, DMI type 20, 19 bytes
Memory Device Mapped Address
Starting Address: 0x00000000000
Ending Address: 0x0007FFFFFFF
Range Size: 2 GB
Physical Device Handle: 0x000A
Memory Array Mapped Address Handle: 0x000E
Partition Row Position: Unknown
Interleave Position: Unknown
Interleaved Data Depth: Unknown
Handle 0x000D, DMI type 20, 19 bytes
Memory Device Mapped Address
Starting Address: 0x00080000000
Ending Address: 0x000FFFFFFFF
Range Size: 2 GB
Physical Device Handle: 0x000C
Memory Array Mapped Address Handle: 0x000E
Partition Row Position: Unknown
Interleave Position: Unknown
Interleaved Data Depth: Unknown
Alright, 4 GiB it is. But I can't use all of it:
?: cat /proc/meminfo | head -n 1
MemTotal: 3913452 kB
Somehow, somewhere, I lost 274 MiB. Where did 6% of my memory go?
Now I know the address ranges in DMI are incorrect, because the ACPI memory map reports usable ranges well beyond the ending address of the second memory module:
?: dmesg | grep -E "BIOS-e820: .* usable"
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000000009e7ff] usable
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000000100000-0x00000000dee7bfff] usable
[ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000100000000-0x0000000117ffffff] usable
I get pretty much the same info from /proc/iomem
(except for the 4 kiB hole 0x000-0xFFF
), which also shows that the kernel only accounts for less than 8 MiB.
I guess 0x00000000-0x7FFFFFFF
is indeed mapped to the first memory module, and 0x80000000-0xDFFFFFFF
to part of the second memory module (a bunch of ACPI NVS things live between 0xDEE7C000 and 0xDEF30FFF, and the remaining 16-something MiB of that range are just 'reserved'). I guess the highest 0x18000000
bytes of the second memory module are mapped above the 4 GiB mark.
But even then, there are two problems:
- 128 MiB (
0x08000000
bytes, living somewhere between0xE0000000
and0xFFFFFFFF
) are still completely unaccounted for. To note, my graphics card is on PCI-Express and (allegedly) has 1 GiB dedicated memory, so that shouldn't be the culprit. Did the BIOS screw up in moving the memory, leaving it partially shadowed by MMIO? - Even with this mediocre explanation, I only 'found' 128 MiB. But
/proc/meminfo
is reporting a much larger deficit; where's the other 146 MiB? How does Linux countMemTotal
?
© Super User or respective owner