Search Results

Search found 37 results on 2 pages for 'antispam'.

Page 1/2 | 1 2  | Next Page >

  • Forefront 2010 Antispam vs Exchange 2010 Antispam?

    - by Jon
    They look pretty similar, do they work together or independently? For example you have content filtering in Forefront where you can specify SCL barriers, just like in Exchange. However theres no where to specify the Spam mailbox. So will the spam mailbox still be used if I configure this in Forefront?

    Read the article

  • phpBB3 antispam: mod for "patrolling" the forum?

    - by STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
    I've been working on various antispam measure in a phpBB3-based forum I host. Now I was thinking of an extension/mod that ties in with editing of posts (and later perhaps signatures/profiles) in that new text or edited text defaults to something like "not patrolled" and moderators could then in a special queue review text that contains links or similar item (based on heuristics). Now the question: does such a mod exist (I didn't find one)? If it does exist and anyone has used it (or them), please include your experiences with it in the answer.

    Read the article

  • Alternative to K9 spam handler?

    - by overtherainbow
    I've been using the free K9 spam handler for a couple of years now, but it hasn't been updated since 2004 and has a couple of bugs that bother me: The Find feature stops at the first e-mail found, and doesn't go further I'd like to copy the list of e-mails marked as either real or SPAM, but K9 only copies the first item in the clipboard For those of you who have researched desktop anti-SPAM handlers under Windows, what do you suggest as an alternative, either free or moderately priced?

    Read the article

  • how Postfix anti spam configuration works with DNS-based Blackhole List providers

    - by Ashish
    Hello, I have setup a Postfix mail server for incoming mails that is required to never reply to external enviornment i.e it will accept all incoming mails and never reply anything that can be used as a trace to locate and verify it's existence. I have implemented the Postfix anti-UCE configuration by using the following settings in postfix main.cf for countering spam generating mail servers: 'smtpd_recipient_restrictions = reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net' Now i have certain doubts/questions: How Postfix is able to communicate with Black hole list providers i.e How this whole process works?, e.g here they are zen.spamhaus.org, bl.spamcop.net, so that i can test the performance of whole process. Can a header be added in the received mail regarding the status of the results of the above verification process, since i will not reply any traces from my incoming mail receiving Postfix server, so i need this feature? Please post relevant links for reference. Thanks in advance!!! Ashish

    Read the article

  • Apache log analyzer which manages time spent to serve the request

    - by antispam
    I need to monitor performance in my web server (there's an application server in the back) and create reports for senior management. I've enabled %T/%D in my Apache logs and I would like to know if there's an Apache log analyzer or some other tool which parses these values and manages them showing charts or reports. I am looking mostly for an integrated solution and not in the line of awk+gnuplot scripts.

    Read the article

  • Keepalived alternative for Solaris 10

    - by antispam
    We are considering an architecture like the one in the picture for Solaris 10 That is, high avalaibility software load balancers in front of web and application servers. Unfortunately, Keepalived is not available for Solaris at the moment. Is there an equivalent artifact for substituing Keepalived which is supported in Solaris 10? Is there an equivalent architecture for Solaris using HA SW load balancing? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Load balancing application servers with Alteon 2424-SSL

    - by antispam
    We are having problems with load balancing configuration and we would like to clear the situation. We need to load balance among four JavaEE web application servers. The servers are configured as host1 port 7001 host1 port 7002 host2 port 7001 host2 port 7002 Do any of you know if it is possible with Nortel 2424-SSL application switch? Which would be the best configuration for it? (vips, ports, groups, services, ...) Thank you very much.

    Read the article

  • Tracing slow Java I/O in Solaris 10

    - by antispam
    We have a Java application which is significantly slower in Solaris 10 server than in Windows PC. We have profiled (-Xprof) the application and observed that UnixFileSystem.getBooleanAttributes0 method consumes about 40% CPU time with native calls. How can we follow our search to identify which is the cause of the slow behaviour? Thank you very much.

    Read the article

  • Developing WLST scripts with Eclipse

    - by antispam
    We are in the process of developing several WLST (WebLogic Scripting Tool) scripts and we would like to setup a development environment. Has anybody managed to configure Eclipse PyDev (or another plugin) to support it? Do you know any other alternative? Thank you for your answers.

    Read the article

  • JDBC profiling tools

    - by antispam
    We need to profile the JDBC operations of several web applications, number of queries, time spent, rows returned, ... Have you used any free/commercial JDBC profiling tool? What are your experiences? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • E-mail spam analyzing tools

    - by goran
    I have some mail logs, for which I assume that come from our hosted mail server antivirus: 1, antispam: 1, sanesecurity: 1, chkuser: 1, chkrbl: 1, chkmx: 1, chkptr: 0, greylistlevel: 0, rejectemptyfrom: 1, spamscore: 7.00, redirectspam: 1, maxrcpt: 30, maxdatabytes: 50000000, nightguard: 0, whitelistsigned: 1 (+ info on each message score) as plain text files. I was wondering if anyone knows which tool produce such logs and if there are any tools that would parse and analyze the logs?

    Read the article

  • Google pénalise le référencement des sites truffés de publicités, compliquant l'accès au contenu, ils sont considérés comme du spam

    Google pénalise le référencement des sites truffés de publicités Compliquant l'accès au contenu, ils sont considérés comme du spam Matt Cutts, responsable de l'équipe antispam de Google, s'est présenté à la conférence PubCon avec de bonnes et de mauvaises nouvelles. Le moteur de recherche pénalise désormais le référencement des sites truffés de publicités rendant difficile l'accès aux contenus pertinents des pages. Ce qui compte, a expliqué Cutts dans sa keynote est « combien de contenu est au-dessus de la ligne de flottaison [...] Si vous avez des publicités obscurcissant votre contenu, vous avez intérêt à y repenser », laissant entendre que les sites compli...

    Read the article

  • Référencement : Google crée un outil pour renier les mauvais liens entrants et rectifier les mauvaises décisions SEO

    Référencement : Google crée un outil pour renier les mauvais liens entrants Et rectifier les mauvaises décisions SEO Google annonce un nouvel outil permettant de désavouer les liens entrants vers son site et se débarrasser des effets néfastes de certaines stratégies de référencement douteuses. La firme souligne que ce service s'adresse aux webmasters notifiés d'une action antispam basée sur des « liens non naturels » pointant vers leur site. Il permettra de chasser ces backlinks et regagner la réputation de ces pages. [IMG]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Ni1-6PIqNHk/UH3EKHp0AoI/AAAAAAAAAFY/UB7LI6eWE6M/s1600/img1.png[/IMG] Le « PageRank » ou l'obs...

    Read the article

  • ASE reports messages as spam?

    - by Adam
    Outside users are attempting to send to our domain (www.lrffpd.com). It's getting rejected sporatically. All of the senders are getting some variation of the error "Unagi.teksnax.com has rejected the message. This message has been blocked because ASE reports it as spam". The error number varies. -Our firewall is a Fortigate and it runs the built-in Fortigate AntiSpam software. I don't this problem is becuase of the firewall because the error is coming from the server, not the firewall. -On the Exchange 2003 server we run ESET NOD32 for Exchange (only for AntiVirus). We also run the IMF filter built into Exchange. I've NEVER heard of ASE and can't find any information about them. What do you think this could be?

    Read the article

  • Zimbra server status showing red in control panel

    - by Debianuser
    I have been having a weird problem with Zimbra(7.1.4_GA_2555.DEBIAN5) lately: On the (web)control panel the status keep changing to red every few days. When this is happens the output of zmcontrol status still shows running: antispam Running antivirus Running imapproxy Running ldap Running logger Running mailbox Running memcached Running mta Running snmp Running spell Running stats Running zmconfigd Running Every thing runs fine except automated mail forwarding from one account to another(which is critical for us). I have been through Zimbra forums and the following ALWAYS fixes the issue: su - zimbra -c "zmprov mcf zimbraLogHostname mail.mydomain.com" /opt/zimbra/libexec/zmsyslogsetup /etc/init.d/rsyslog restart su - zimbra -c "zmcontrol restart" After I run the above commands, the status on control panel turns green and mail forwarding starts to work again BUT only for a few days. Other than the above, everything works fine including Server statistics. Anyone seen this issue before?

    Read the article

  • E-mail from specific domain not delivered to one of the cc: recipients on Exchange 2010

    - by BobC
    we have a user on Exchange 2010 server who doesn't get email from one specific domain if her address is in cc: field. If she is a main recipient (To:) it goes through. We checked Exchange logs and it looks like our server doesn't even try to deliver it, it simply ignores her email address completely. We did several tests: send email with her email address in cc: field from another domain, succeeded send email with her email address in to: field from another domain, succeeded send email with her email address in to: field from affected domain, succeeded turn off all email rules check via webmail We also turned off firewall, antispam and antivirus for SMTP rule. Does anyone have any idea what could be an issue here? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Is it OK for the top level domain .FM not to provide the whois server? [closed]

    - by Igor
    just a question in the title Is it OK for the top level domain .FM not to provide the whois server? Are there any other TLD that behaves in the same manner? The question came out of the whois command answer $ whois dot.fm This TLD has no whois server, but you can access the whois database at http://www.dot.fm/whois.html EDIT Sorry for the "OK" in the question, yes it is quite vague. We're desiring to acquire the domain name in *.fm and my worry was about to be more suspected for the antispam filters and other services relying on the DNS and so. Is this observation have sense or not?

    Read the article

  • PostgreSQL: performance descrease due to index bloatper

    - by Henry-Nicolas Tourneur
    I'm running a PgSQL 8.1 on a CentOS 4.4 system (not upgradable unfortunately). There's a Java app running on top of the PgSQL daemon and we got to reindex the database every 2 months or so. Also important: the database isn't growing. It looks like the bloat is now coming faster than before and this tends to increase. My config is available here, autovacuum daemon is enabled and running quite often: pastebin.com/RytNj7dK You can also find the output of this query wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Show_database_bloat 3 hours after running reindex: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=75fybKyd 72 hours after running reindex: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=89VKd7PC Does anyone have any idea what should I tweak to get rid of that growing bloat? Thanks for your help PS: due to antispam prevention system, I had to remove the first 2 http:// prefixes for my two first links.

    Read the article

  • User-trainable spam filtering with Exim and Dovecot

    - by pascal
    Currently I'm using Exim to deliver mails via dovecot-lda into Dovecot mailboxes. I'd like to add spam filtering, but I don't want to reject false-positives in Exim, and I want to train the bayesian filter from the client. So: How do I configure a spamd such that spam lands in a Junk folder, and when the user finds spam in their Inbox, or ham in their Junk, they move it to the correct box which trains the spamd. I have found dovecot-antispam but I'm not sure about its quality, it only seems to support dspam (and crm114, which is dead, last release August 2009).

    Read the article

1 2  | Next Page >