Search Results

Search found 49 results on 2 pages for 'atch'.

Page 1/2 | 1 2  | Next Page >

  • Just to not to be ignorant.

    - by atch
    Could anyone explain to me why is it that producers of processors claim that their processor can perform so many thousands (or millions) operations per second and yet typical program (Word, VS etc.) on my machine with 4GB, 3500hz starts with no less than 10 sec. Have to mention that I've just formatted disk and tick any necessary boxes to optimize my machine. So if for example outlook starts in 10 sec I wonder how many millions of operations have to be performed to run such program? Thanks

    Read the article

  • VS 2008 vs VS 2010

    - by atch
    Guys would you say that having installed VS 2008 and VS 2010 on one machine would the latter work slower than the former? Because when I work with VS 2010 I can't get the feeling of that it is slower than the VS 2008.

    Read the article

  • Sort results in Google.

    - by atch
    Guys is there a way to have results from Google displayed in predefined order? Like for example the newest at the top? Very often I'm looking for some new information on C++0x and I would like to have results sorted in that way. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Processor speeds on my machine don't live up to manufacturer hype

    - by atch
    Why am I not seeing the promised speed claims of processor manufacturers on my computer? Producers of processors claim that their product can perform so many thousands (or millions) of operations per second. And yet on my machine (4GB, 3500hz), the typical program (Word, Visual Studio etc.) takes at least 10 seconds to start. I've formatted my hard drive and ticked all the necessary boxes to optimize my machine and yet I'm not seeing the promised speeds. Say it takes Outlook ten seconds to load. How many millions of operations does it really go through in order to start up?

    Read the article

  • Just to not to be ingnorant.

    - by atch
    Could anyone explain to me why is it that producers of processors claim that their processor can perform so many thousands (or millions) operations per second and yet typical program (Word, VS etc.) on my machine with 4GB, 3500hz starts with no less than 10sek. Have to mention that I've just formatted disk and tick any necessarry boxes to optimize my machine. So if for example outlook starts in 10 sek I wonder how many millions of operations have to be performed to run such program? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Region highlighting in Visual Studio 2010

    - by atch
    Guys, feature in new release of Visual Studio which is block/region highlighting, I think is quite useless, and definitely frustrating when every time my cursor passes this line my whole region is being highlighted. Does anyone of you feel the same way and if not do you find this usefull for anything? Because I can't.

    Read the article

  • Cannot cout data [C++] [metaprogramming]

    - by atch
    Hi, Guys, reffering to last post I'm trying to output data while template is instantiated template <unsigned long N> struct binary { std::cout << N;//<---------------------------------I'M TRYING HERE static unsigned const value = binary<N/10>::value << 1 // prepend higher bits | N%10; // to lowest bit but I'm getting an error: 'Error 2 error C2886: 'std::cout' : symbol cannot be used in a member using- declaration ' Thanks for help P.S. And could anyone explain why actually I can't do that?

    Read the article

  • Passing array by ref.

    - by atch
    Ref. to my last post and sellibitze's comment to that post on passing array by ref rather than by value, why is it that when I'm passing array by value compiler can deduce arguments but it won't do it if I pass it by value? @Paul So just to make it clear when I'm declaring fnc: void f(int a[]);//I'm passing a pointer but when I'm declaring: void f(int &a[]);//I'm passing a ref? Do I understand this correctly now?

    Read the article

  • Debugger ignores me.

    - by atch
    Having code: Date::Date(const char* day, const char* month, const char* year):is_leap__(false) { my_day_ = lexical_cast<int>(day); my_month_ = static_cast<Month>(lexical_cast<int>(month)); /*Have to check month here, other ctor assumes month is correct*/ if (my_month_ < 1 || my_month_ > 12) { throw std::exception("Incorrect month."); } my_year_ = lexical_cast<int>(year); if (!check_range_year_(my_year_)) { throw std::exception("Year out of range."); } if (check_leap_year_(my_year_))//SKIPS THIS LINE { is_leap__ = true; } if (!check_range_day_(my_day_, my_month_)) { throw std::exception("Day out of range."); } } bool Date::check_leap_year_(int year)const//IF I MARK THIS LINE WITH BREAKPOINT I'M GETTING MSG THAT THERE IS NO EXECUTABLE CODE IS ASSOSIATED WITH THIS LINE { if (!(year%400) || (year%100 && !(year%4))) { return true; } else { return false; } } Which is very strange in my opinion. There is call to this fnc in my code, why compiler ignores that. P.S. I'm trying to debug in release.

    Read the article

  • What's all this fuss about?

    - by atch
    Hi guys, At the beginning I want to state that it is not my intention to upset anyone who uses/like language other than C++. I'm saying that due to the fact that on one forum everytime when I've tried to ask questions of similiar nature I was almost always accused of trying to create a raw. Ok that's having done this is my question: I don't understand why java/c# creators thought/think that having something like vm and having source code compiled to bytecode instead of native code is in a long run any advantage. And why having function compiled for a first time when they are invoked is any advantege? And what's the story about write once run everywhere? When I think about the business of having something written once and it can run everywhere - well in theory this is all well. But I know for a fact that in practice it doesn't look that well at all. It is rather like write once test everywhere. And why would I preffer something to be compiled on runtime instead of compiletime. If I would have to wait even one hour longer for program to be installed once and for all and all the compilation would be done and nothing would be compiled after that I would preffer that. And I don't really know how it works in the real world (I'm a student never worked in IT business) but for example if I have working program written in C++ for Windows and I have wish to move it to another platform wouldn't I have to take my source code and compile it on desired machine? So in other words isn't that rather problem of having compiler which will compile source code on different machines (as far as I'm concerned there is just one C++ and source code will look identical in every machine). And last but not least if you think about it how many programs they are which are really word porting? I personnally can think of 3 maybe four.

    Read the article

  • How to see the code generated by the compiler

    - by atch
    Guys in one of excersises (ch.5,e.8) from TC++PL Bjarne asks to do following: '"Run some tests to see if your compiler really generates equivalent code for iteration using pointers and iteration using indexing. If different degrees of optimization can be requested, see if and how that affects the quality of the generated code"' Any idea how to eat it and with what? Thanks in advice.

    Read the article

  • Can operator= may be not a member?

    - by atch
    Having construction in a form: struct Node { Node():left_(nullptr), right_(nullptr) { } int id_; Node* left_; Node* right_; }; I would like to enable syntax: Node parent; Node child; parent.right_ = child; So in order to do so I need: Node& operator=(Node* left, Node right); but I'm getting msg that operator= has to be a member fnc; Is there any way to circumvent this restriction?

    Read the article

  • error C2784: Could not deduce template argument

    - by atch
    Hi guys, Still fighting with templates. In this example, despite the fact that is copied straight from a book I'm getting the following error message: Error 2 error C2784: 'IsClassT<T>::One IsClassT<T>::test(int C::* )' : could not deduce template argument for 'int C::* ' from 'int'. This is an example from a book Templates - The Complete Guide. (I work with Visual Studio 2010 RC). template<typename T> class IsClassT { private: typedef char One; typedef struct { char a[2]; } Two; template<typename C> static One test(int C::*); template<typename C> static Two test(…); public: enum { Yes = sizeof(IsClassT<T>::test<T>(0)) == 1 }; enum { No = !Yes }; }; class MyClass { }; struct MyStruct { }; union MyUnion { }; void myfunc() { } enum E {e1} e; // check by passing type as template argument template <typename T> void check() { if (IsClassT<T>::Yes) { std::cout << " IsClassT " << std::endl; } else { std::cout << " !IsClassT " << std::endl; } } // check by passing type as function call argument template <typename T> void checkT (T) { check<T>(); } int main() { /*std::cout << "int: "; check<int>(); */ std::cout << "MyClass: "; check<MyClass>(); } And although I know roughly what's going on in this example I cannot fix this error. Thanks for help.

    Read the article

  • Boost::binary<>

    - by atch
    Hi, Is there anything in boost libraries like binary? For example I would like to write: binary<10101> a; I'm ashamed to admit that I've tried to find it (Google, Boost) but no results. They're mention something about binary_int< but I couldn't find neither if it is available nor what header file shall I include; Thanks for help.

    Read the article

  • Exception Specification

    - by atch
    Hi, guys I know that this feature will be depracated in c++0x, but for me as a total novice it seems like a good idea to have it. Could anyone explain to me why isn't a good idea? Thanks in advance. P.S. I know I've said it but I'll say it again: formating in this forum really pisses me off. Why can't I have ENTER as end of line but instead of I have to press space twice?

    Read the article

  • Am I deleting this properly?

    - by atch
    I have some struct: struct A { const char* name_; A* left_; A* right_; A(const char* name):name_(name), left_(nullptr), right_(nullptr){} A(const A&); //A(const A*);//ToDo A& operator=(const A&); ~A() { /*ToDo*/ }; }; /*Just to compile*/ A& A::operator=(const A& pattern) { //check for self-assignment if (this != &pattern) { void* p = new char[sizeof(A)]; } return *this; } A::A(const A& pat) { void* p = new char[sizeof(A)]; A* tmp = new (p) A("tmp"); tmp->~A(); delete tmp;//I WONDER IF HERE I SHOULD USE DIFFERENT delete[]? } int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]) { A a("a"); A b = a; cin.get(); return 0; } Guys I know this is far from ideal and far from finished. But please don't tell me the answer how to do it properly. I'm trying to figure it out myself. The only think I would like to know if I'm deleting my memory in proper way. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Problem with FlowLayout

    - by atch
    public class MyFrame extends JFrame { public MyFrame(String title) { setSize(200, 200); setTitle(Integer.toString(super.getSize().width)); setLayout(new FlowLayout()); for (int i = 0; i < 5; ++i) { JButton b = new JButton(); b.setSize(90,50); b.setText(Integer.toString(b.getSize().width)); this.add(b);![alt text][1] } this.setVisible(true); } } why if having button widht 90 I'm getting window where three buttons are in one row instead of two?

    Read the article

  • Templates - Exercises

    - by atch
    Hi, As I mentioned in my yesterday's post, I'm trying to teach myself templates from the book: Templates: The Complete Guide. And although I'm finding this book very nicely presented and material there is explained really well there are no exercises attached after each chapter to test your knowlege, like it is in The C++ Language by B.S for example and had done all exercises from "The C++" I really feel benefit from doing them. So what I'm asking today is: Does anyone know where can I get excersises with templates. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Which one is more popular?

    - by atch
    Which of IDE's I'm more likely to meet in an office? Borland or Visual Studio? I wouldn't ask this question here (I could use google and type which is better) only for a reason that in my previous cariere as an engineer I worked (and most of my friends) all the time on AutoCAD not on Microstation even though Microstation had always been better software (stability, conforming to standards, ease of use etc.). Thanks for answers.

    Read the article

1 2  | Next Page >