Search Results

Search found 88 results on 4 pages for 'clientside'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 1/4 | 1 2 3 4  | Next Page >

  • Clientside anticheating in multiplayer game 1vs1

    - by garnav
    I'm developing a simple card game, where there will be a matchmaking system that will put you against another human player. This will be the only game mode available, a 1vs1 against another human, no AI. I want to prevent cheating as much as possible. I have already read a lot of similar questions here and I already know that I cannot trust the client and I have to make all verifications server side. I intend to have a server (need one for the matchmaking anyway) and I intend to make some verifications server side but if I want to check everything server side this makes my server to be able to keep track of the state of all current games and check every action, and I don't have the money/infrastructure to support that server. My idea is to make clients check and verify some of the actions made by their opponent* and if they find some illegal action notify the possible cheating to the server and make the server verify it. This will still require my server to keep track of all current games, but it will save resources only checking some things that cannot be checked at client side(like card order in the deck) and only checking other things when they are actually wrong. *(only those they can check with out allowing themselves cheating! for example:they can't check if the played card was in hand cos that will need them to know all cards in hand) Summing up, my questions are: is this a viable approach? will I actually save resources doing this or the extra complexity in the server and client for exchanging this messages is not worth it? do you know any game that has successfully or unsuccessfully tried a similar approach? Thanks all for reading and answering

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC & ADO.NET Entity Framework clientside validation

    - by JK
    Using aspnet mvc2 with the model auto-generated by entity framework: Is it possible to tell entity framework to auto-annotate all fields? eg: If database field says not null then add [Required] If DB field is a nvarchar(x) then add [StringLength(x)] And so on? What if the field name contains the string "email" eg CustomerEmail - can I get EF to auto-annotate that with an appropriate annotation ([Regex()] maybe) As I understand it, if the model fields are annotated, and I use both Html.ValidationMessageFor() and use if (ModelState.IsValid) in my controller, then that is all I need to do to have basic clientside input validation working? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Asp.Net MVC2 Clientside Validation problem with controls with prefixes

    - by alexander
    The problem is: when I put 2 controls of the same type on a page I need to specify different prefixes for binding. In this case the validation rules generated right after the form are incorrect. So how to get client validation work for the case?: the page contains: <% Html.RenderPartial(ViewLocations.Shared.PhoneEditPartial, new PhoneViewModel { Phone = person.PhonePhone, Prefix = "PhonePhone" }); Html.RenderPartial(ViewLocations.Shared.PhoneEditPartial, new PhoneViewModel { Phone = person.FaxPhone, Prefix = "FaxPhone" }); %> the control ViewUserControl<PhoneViewModel>: <%= Html.TextBox(Model.GetPrefixed("CountryCode"), Model.Phone.CountryCode) %> <%= Html.ValidationMessage("Phone.CountryCode", new { id = Model.GetPrefixed("CountryCode"), name = Model.GetPrefixed("CountryCode") })%> where Model.GetPrefixed("CountryCode") just returns "FaxPhone.CountryCode" or "PhonePhone.CountryCode" depending on prefix And here is the validation rules generated after the form. They are duplicated for the field name "Phone.CountryCode". While the desired result is 2 rules (required, number) for each of the FieldNames "FaxPhone.CountryCode", "PhonePhone.CountryCode" The question is somewhat duplicate of http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2675606/asp-net-mvc2-clientside-validation-and-duplicate-ids-problem but the advise to manually generate ids doesn't helps.

    Read the article

  • DevExpress AspxGridView clientside SelectionChanged problem when using paged ObjectDataSource

    - by Constantin Baciu
    The context is as follows: One DexExpress AspxGridView with a server-side paging/filtering/sorting mechanism (using ObjectDataSource). I've been having problems with the filter mechanism ( see this stack ). Now, the problem I'm having is this: the client-side events get mangled between DataSource events. :O . Let me explain what happens: if I change the page (or sort/filter for that matter), then, select one row from the grid, the client-side SelectionChanged event fires well. If I change the page (or sort/filter), the event doesn't fire anymore. Instead, on the server side, I get a "The method or operation is not implemented" exception with the following stack-trace: at DevExpress.Web.Data.WebDataProviderBase.GetListSouceRowValue(Int32 listSourceRowIndex, String fieldName) at DevExpress.Web.Data.WebDataProxy.GetListSourceRowValue(Int32 listSourceRowIndex, String fieldName) at DevExpress.Web.Data.WebDataProxy.GetKeyValueCore(Int32 index, GetKeyValueCallback getKeyValue) at DevExpress.Web.Data.WebDataSelectionBase.GetSelectedValues(String[] fieldNames, Int32 visibleStartIndex, Int32 visibleRowCountOnPage) at DevExpress.Web.Data.WebDataProxy.GetSelectedValues(String[] fieldNames) at DevExpress.Web.ASPxGridView.ASPxGridView.FBSelectFieldValues(String[] args) at DevExpress.Web.ASPxGridView.ASPxGridView.GetCallbackResultCore() at DevExpress.Web.ASPxGridView.ASPxGridView.GetCallbackResult() at DevExpress.Web.ASPxClasses.ASPxWebControl.System.Web.UI.ICallbackEventHandler.GetCallbackResult() Am I doing something wrong? Any help will be much appreciated.

    Read the article

  • DevExpress AspxGridView clientside SelectionChanged problem when using paged ObjectDataSource

    - by Constantin Baciu
    The context is as follows: One DexExpress AspxGridView with a server-side paging/filtering/sorting mechanism (using ObjectDataSource). I've been having problems with the filter mechanism ( see this stack ). Now, the problem I'm having is this: the client-side events get mangled between DataSource events. :O . Let me explain what happens: if I change the page (or sort/filter for that matter), then, select one row from the grid, the client-side SelectionChanged event fires well. If I change the page (or sort/filter), the event doesn't fire anymore. Instead, on the server side, I get a "The method or operation is not implemented" exception with the following stack-trace: at DevExpress.Web.Data.WebDataProviderBase.GetListSouceRowValue(Int32 listSourceRowIndex, String fieldName) at DevExpress.Web.Data.WebDataProxy.GetListSourceRowValue(Int32 listSourceRowIndex, String fieldName) at DevExpress.Web.Data.WebDataProxy.GetKeyValueCore(Int32 index, GetKeyValueCallback getKeyValue) at DevExpress.Web.Data.WebDataSelectionBase.GetSelectedValues(String[] fieldNames, Int32 visibleStartIndex, Int32 visibleRowCountOnPage) at DevExpress.Web.Data.WebDataProxy.GetSelectedValues(String[] fieldNames) at DevExpress.Web.ASPxGridView.ASPxGridView.FBSelectFieldValues(String[] args) at DevExpress.Web.ASPxGridView.ASPxGridView.GetCallbackResultCore() at DevExpress.Web.ASPxGridView.ASPxGridView.GetCallbackResult() at DevExpress.Web.ASPxClasses.ASPxWebControl.System.Web.UI.ICallbackEventHandler.GetCallbackResult() Am I doing something wrong? Any help will be much appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Problem with MessageContract, Generic return types and clientside naming

    - by Soeteman
    I'm building a web service which uses MessageContracts, because I want to add custom fields to my SOAP header. In a previous topic, I learned that a composite response has to be wrapped. For this purpose, I devised a generic ResponseWrapper class. [MessageContract(WrapperNamespace = "http://mynamespace.com", WrapperName="WrapperOf{0}")] public class ResponseWrapper<T> { [MessageBodyMember(Namespace = "http://mynamespace.com")] public T Response { get; set; } } I made a ServiceResult base class, defined as follows: [MessageContract(WrapperNamespace = "http://mynamespace.com")] public class ServiceResult { [MessageBodyMember] public bool Status { get; set; } [MessageBodyMember] public string Message { get; set; } [MessageBodyMember] public string Description { get; set; } } To be able to include the request context in the response, I use a derived class of ServiceResult, which uses generics: [MessageContract(WrapperNamespace = "http://mynamespace.com", WrapperName = "ServiceResultOf{0}")] public class ServiceResult<TRequest> : ServiceResult { [MessageBodyMember] public TRequest Request { get; set; } } This is used in the following way [OperationContract()] ResponseWrapper<ServiceResult<HCCertificateRequest>> OrderHealthCertificate(RequestContext<HCCertificateRequest> context); I expected my client code to be generated as ServiceResultOfHCCertificateRequest OrderHealthCertificate(RequestContextOfHCCertificateRequest context); Instead, I get the following: ServiceResultOfHCCertificateRequestzSOTD_SSj OrderHealthCertificate(CompType1 c1, CompType2 c2, HCCertificateRequest context); CompType1 and CompType2 are properties of the RequestContext class. The problem is that a hash is added to the end of ServiceResultOfHCCertificateRequestzSOTD_SSj. How do I need define my generic return types in order for the client type to be generated as expected (without the hash)?

    Read the article

  • UpdatePanel Javascript Error on Adding Clientside Listbox items After postback

    - by DBMaster
    Hi, I have a Dynamic list control of Metabuilder.Webcontrol inside UpdatePanel,I am adding removing Items using Javascript from the list control. It works fine Inside UpdatePanel. I have another control Gridview along with checkbox's which require postback to get populated. Once It gets populated successfully inside update without postback. I checked few rows and wanted to add them into List Control using Javascript. It says "object doesn't support this property or method" function addItmList(idv,valItem) { var list =document.getElementById('ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_MyList'); //var generatedName = "newItem" + ( list.options.length + 1 ); list.Add(idv,valItem); } function checkitemvalues() { var gvET = document.getElementById("ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_grd"); var target = document.getElementById('ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_lstIControl'); var newOption = window.document.createElement('OPTION'); var rCount = gvET.rows.length; var rowIdx = 0; var tcount = 1; for (rowIdx; rowIdx<=rCount-1; rowIdx++) { var rowElement = gvET.rows[rowIdx]; var chkBox = rowElement.cells[0].firstChild; var cod = rowElement.cells[1].innerText; var desc = rowElement.cells[2].innerText; if (chkBox.checked == true){ addItmList(rowElement.cells[1].innerText,rowElement.cells[2].innerText); } } } Code Behind ScriptManager.RegisterClientScriptBlock( Me.Page, Me.GetType(), MyList.ClientID, "" & vbCr & vbLf & "window.mylistid='" + MyList.ClientID + "';" & vbCr & vbLf & "", True ) Remember my code works fine. It cannot maintain the state of List Control thats why It says Object reqiured. Can any one help me out. After Update Panel Why My javascript doesnt add Items into ListBox. Thanks In advance

    Read the article

  • MVC2 Clientside Validation and duplicate ID's problem

    - by Dusty Roberts
    I'm using MVC2 with VS2010 I have a view that has two partial views in it: "Login" and "Register" both partial views contains the Email address field i use the following in both partial views: <%: Html.TextBoxFor(model => model.EmailAddress ) %><br /><%: Html.ValidationMessageFor(model => model.EmailAddress) %> if i use both partial views on one page, it ends up having duplicate id's so validation happens across both views (even thopugh they are in seperate forms) how can i go about eliminating this

    Read the article

  • Clientside going serverside with node.js

    - by Sveisvei
    Hello, I`ve been looking for a serverside language for some time, and python got my attention somewhat. But as I already know and love javascript, I now want learn to code on the server with js and node.js. Now, what books and what subjects do I need to learn to understand the serverside world better? (let me know if Im to vague)

    Read the article

  • ASP MVC 2: Regular expression attribute working on clientside but not on serverside

    - by wh0emPah
    [Required(ErrorMessage = "Date is required")] [RegularExpression(@"^(((0[1-9]|[12]\d|3[01])\/(0[13578]|1[02])\/((1[6-9]|[2-9]\d)\d{2}))|((0[1-9]|[12]\d|30)\/(0[13456789]|1[012])\/((1[6-9]|[2-9]\d)\d{2}))|((0[1-9]|1\d|2[0-8])\/02\/((1[6-9]|[2-9]\d)\d{2}))|(29\/02\/((1[6-9]|[2-9]\d)(0[48]|[2468][048]|[13579][26])|((16|[2468][048]|[3579][26])00))))$", ErrorMessage="Date is not valid must be like (dd/mm/jjjj)")] public DateTime Startdate{ get; set;} The client-side validation works perfectly. So it seems that JavaScript can successfully understand my regular expression. But when I do a postback, and the modelstate.Isvalid() gets called. My date isn't valid anymore. So I'm guessing that when .NET performs the matching with the regEx it doesn't match. My question: Why does this regular expression match on the client side but not on the server side?

    Read the article

  • error message: clientside validation

    - by user281180
    What is the meaning of the following error message?How can I use the EnableClienTValidation()? Error 3 'System.Web.Mvc.HtmlHelper' does not contain a definition for 'EnableClientValidation' and no extension method 'EnableClientValidation' accepting a first argument of type 'System.Web.Mvc.HtmlHelper' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) c:\Dev\DEV\test3\Code\MvcUI\Views\Customer\Create.aspx 11 13 MvcUI I have reference the following:`" type="text/javascript" <script src="<%=Url.Content("~/Scripts/jquery.validate.js")%>" type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="<%= Url.Content("~/Scripts/MicrosoftAjax.js")%>" type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="<%= Url.Content("~/Scripts/MicrosoftMvcAjax.js")%>" type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="<%= Url.Content("~/Scripts/MicrosoftMvcJQueryValidation.js" )%>" type="text/javascript"></script> `

    Read the article

  • Telerik RadGrid: grid clientside pagination

    - by ram
    I have a web service which returns me some data,I am massaging this data and using this as datasource for my radgrid (telerik). The datasource is quite large, and would like to paginate it. I found couple of problems when I paginate it in the server side I have to bind the grid again for pagination, which essentially means I have to make a call to WS again to get the data. This is an expensive call for me. I would rather forgo the benefits of pagination and would display all the results in the same page, except for it would be a bit clumsy During the postback RadGrid1.Items.Count happens to be the number of items getting paginated (25- in my case) which is expected as all the items in the datasource are not getting bound. This of course is not an issue. The real issue is that we have some checkboxes which get checked based on some business condition. We add this to our business object/DB later. So if the user has not navigated all the pages, these "checked" items do not get added as pagination limits the "Items" in the grid to those which get bound for that particular page index. My Thoughts: I would rather have some sort of client side pagination, where we can hide/show contents than going to the server and doing a databind every time. Though it will return all the results, the UI will not be clumsy and the grid would have "all the items" during postback Is there a way to do it ? If it were a regular asp.net gridView, can someone point me to a good article which would serve my purpose Ram PS: who else think radgrid is crazy ? (unfortunately I did not make this choice)

    Read the article

  • clicking on a button clientSide does not cause postback

    - by Andreas Niedermair
    see this example: <form runat="server"> <asp:Button runat="server" ID="btFoo" Text="asp.net button" /> <button id="btFoo2">open modal</button> <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function() { var btFoo = $('#<%= this.btFoo.ClientID %>'); btFoo.click(); // this will work and cause a postback btFoo.click(function() { alert('click triggered'); }); var dialog = $('<div/>'); dialog.text('please click yes'); dialog.dialog({ autoOpen: false, open: function() { var widget = dialog.dialog('widget'); widget.appendTo($('form')); }, buttons: { 'YES': function() { btFoo.click(); // this will cause a click, but no postback??!! } } }); var btFoo2 = $('#btFoo2'); btFoo2.click(function() { dialog.dialog('open'); return false; }); }); </script> </form> any help would be appreciated, to get this example working!

    Read the article

  • How are clientside security vulnerabilities generally discovered?

    - by Jehjoa
    I mean in operating systems or their applications. The only way I can think of is examine binaries for the use of dangerous functions like strcpy(), and then try to exploit those. Though with compiler improvements like Visual Studio's /GS switch this possibility should mostly be a thing of the past. Or am I mistaken? What other ways do people use to find vulnerabilities? Just load your target in a debugger, then send unexpected input and see what happens? This seems like a long and tedious process. Could anyone recommend some good books or websites on this subject? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Clientside Javascript --> Serverside Java --> user is served a .doc

    - by ignorantslut
    I am helping someone out with a javascript-based web app (even though I know next to nothing about web development) and we are unsure about the best way to implement a feature we'd like to have. Basically, the user will be using our tool to view all kinds of boring data in tables, columns, etc. via javascript. We want to implement a feature where the user can click a button or link that then allows the user to download the displayed data in a .doc file. Our basic idea so far is something like: call a Java function on the server with the desired data passed in as a String when the link is clicked generate the .doc file on the server automatically "open" a link to the file in the client's browser to initiate the download Is this possible? If so, is it feasible? Or, can you recommend a better solution? edit: the data does not reside on the server; rather, it is queried from a SQL database

    Read the article

  • Check result of ASP.Net validator clientside

    - by Steffen
    I know the built-in ASP.Net validators come with a client-side framework, however I've been unable to find anything that lets me check a single validator for it's Valid state. I expect it to be possible though, so I hope someone in here knows how to do it :-) The validator in question is a RegularExpressionValidator, which I use to determine whether an e-mail address is valid or not. Here's some brief code: <script> function CheckForExistingEmail() { Page_ClientValidate(); // Ensure client validation if (revEmail.IsValid) // pseudo code! { // Perform server side lookup in DB for whether the e-mail exists. } } </script> <asp:TextBox runat="server" id="tbEmail" onblur="CheckForExistingEmail();" /> <asp:RegularExpressionValidator id="revEmail" runat="server" ControlToValidate="tbEmail" ErrorMessage="Not a valid e-mail address" ValidationExpression="([a-zA-Z0-9_\-\.]+)@((\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.)|(([a-zA-Z0-9\-]+\.)+))([a-zA-Z]{2,4}|[0-9]{1,3})" />

    Read the article

  • Discussion - Allowing / blocking user access to pages (Client Side Only!) - Javascript / Jquery

    - by Ozaki
    TLDR Using plain HTML / Javascript (Client Side) I want to prevent viewing of certain pages. The user will have to type a username and password and depending on that they get access to different pages. Answers can NOT include server side whatsoever It does not matter if they can break it easily. There is no sensitive information etc. Also the target audience will not have access to internet OR probably know what a cookie is... At some point the user will have to type username / password.(I can define the cookie here) Currently I thought of using cookies to set a cookie for each page to say "true" / "false" but that would get messy with so many cookies. Or setting an array within a cookie for each page? I have div field "#Content" which as it looks encompasses all of my content on the page so blocking out content will be as simple as replacing it with ("sorry you don't have access") etc. For Example: $.cookie("Access","page1, page2, page3"{ expires: 1 }); I am looking for anyway to do this does not have to be with cookies. Would be nice to get a discussion of different ways this can be done. So the question is: What do YOU think would be a good way to go about doing this with client side validation?

    Read the article

  • Using Excel.Application in ASP where Excel is installed on Client Machines instead of the Server.

    - by simonalexander2005
    Hi, I have a server with an asp page on it that generates a report in Excel, using the Excel.Application object. Normally, Excel would have to be installed on the server to work. I was wondering, however, if it is possible to utilise the excel install on client machines to do this instead, as I can't install Excel on the server? Thanks for any help you can give

    Read the article

  • What's wrong in my JavaScript code?

    - by DarkLightA
    I can't figure out what's wrong. var CarObj = function(passengers, maxLoad, wheels, doors, maxSpeed) { this.passengers = passengers; this.maxLoad = maxLoad; this.wheels = wheels; this.doors = doors; this.maxSpeed = maxSpeed; }; var ferrari = new CarObj(4, "700kg", 4, 2, "360km/h"); var output = new Array(); for (var i = 0; i < ferrari.length; i++) { for (var a in ferrari) { output[i] = a; } } document.getElementById('ELEMENTHERE').innerHTML = (output.join(" "));

    Read the article

  • Discussion - Allowing / blocking user access to pages / Client Side Validation (Client Side Only!) -

    - by Ozaki
    TLDR Using plain HTML / Javascript (Client Side) I want to prevent viewing of certain pages. The user will have to type a username and password and depending on that they get access to different pages. Answers can NOT include server side whatsoever It does not matter if they can break it easily. There is no sensitive information etc. Also the target audience will not have access to internet OR probably know what a cookie is... At some point the user will have to type username / password.(I can define the cookie here) Currently I thought of using cookies to set a cookie for each page to say "true" / "false" but that would get messy with so many cookies. Or setting an array within a cookie for each page? I have div field "#Content" which as it looks encompasses all of my content on the page so blocking out content will be as simple as replacing it with ("sorry you don't have access") etc. For Example: $.cookie("Access","page1, page2, page3"{ expires: 1 }); I am looking for anyway to do this does not have to be with cookies. Would be nice to get a discussion of different ways this can be done. So the question is: What do YOU think would be a good way to go about doing this with client side validation? Also on another note discussion on how to make client side more secure or ways to do so are acceptable.

    Read the article

  • Livevalidation clientside validation - can you control the position of the validation messages?

    - by JK
    I'm using LiveValidaion for my clientside validation http://livevalidation.com/ and DataAnnotations for my validation rules. This all works fine except that the clientside error messages are only ever displayed to the right of the element being validated. Is it possible to move this validation message below the element being validated? Or even better, group all messages in a div at the top/bottom of the page? I dont see anything in their docs or examples

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

1 2 3 4  | Next Page >