Search Results

Search found 9 results on 1 pages for 'flockofcode'.

Page 1/1 | 1 

• How does initializing inherited members inside base class constructor reduce the calls to…?

  - by flockofcode

  I’ve read that instead of initializing inherited members ( _c1 in our example ) inside derived constructor: class A { public int _c; } class B:A { public B(int c) { _c = c; } } we should initialize them inside base class constructor, since that way we reduce the calls to inherited members ( _c ): class A { public…

  Read the article

• Can't add/remove items from a collection while foreach is iterating over it

  - by flockofcode

  If I make my own implementation of IEnumerator interface, then I am able ( inside foreach statement )to add or remove items from a albumsList without generating an exception.But if foreach statement uses IEnumerator supplied by albumsList, then trying to add/delete ( inside the foreach )items from albumsList will result in exception: class…

  Read the article

• Checked and Unchecked operators don't seem to be working when...

  - by flockofcode

  1) Is UNCHECKED operator in effect only when expression inside UNCHECKED context uses an explicit cast ( such as byte b1=unchecked((byte)2000); ) and when conversion to particular type can happen implicitly? I’m assuming this since the following expression throws a compile time error: byte b1=unchecked(2000); //compile time error 2) a)…

  Read the article

• Is the following array really multidimensional?

  - by flockofcode

  Book I’ learning from claims that intArray has two dimensions. But since calling intArray.GetLength(1) will result in an IndexoutOfRange exception, couldn’t we claim that unlike rectangular arrays, intArray isn’t really multidimensional and thus has only one dimension? int[][] intArray=new int[3][]; thank you

  Read the article

• Why are member constants available even if there are no instances of a its class?

  - by flockofcode

  1) Why are member constants available even if there are no instances of a its class? 2) Is the only reason why constant expressions need to be fully evaluated at compile time due to compiler replacing constant variable with literal value? 3) Since string is also an object, I would think the following would produce an error, but it…

  Read the article

• Doesn't this defeat the whole purpose of having read-only properties?

  - by flockofcode

  I know how to use properties and I understand that they implicitly call underlying get and set accessors, depending on whether we are writing to or reading from a property. static void Main(string[] args) { A a = new A(); (a.b).i = 100; } class A { private B _b = new B(); public B b { get { return _b; } …

  Read the article

• IS operator behaving a bit strangely

  - by flockofcode

  1) According to my book, IS operator can check whether expression E (E is type) can be converted to the target type only if E is either a reference conversion, boxing or unboxing. Since in the following example IS doesn’t check for either of the three types of conversion, the code shouldn’t work, but it does: int i=100; if (i…

  Read the article

• Why must initialization value of field members be determinable at compile time?

  - by flockofcode

  1) Why must initialization value of field members be determinable at compile time? 2) But if the initialization value needs to be determined at compile time, then why am I able to initialize a A.b field using a reference to an object: class A { B b = new B(); } class B {} Thank you

  Read the article

• Why when I try to instantiate a class instance, do I get StackOverFlowException?

  - by flockofcode

  I keep getting StackOverFlowException whenever I instantiate an instance of A class. I know it has got something to do with the fact that A.b field is of type derived from class A. But why would that cause an exception? static void Main(string[] args) { A a = new A(); // exception } class A { private B b = new B(); } …

  Read the article

1