Search Results

Search found 5309 results on 213 pages for 'w3c validation'.

Page 104/213 | < Previous Page | 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111  | Next Page >

• Marek Potociar on JAX-RS 2

  - by reza_rahman

  Java EE 7 is turning the last lap! Late last month JAX-RS 2 (JSR 339) and Bean Validation 1.1 (JSR 349) were adopted by public review ballot, making them the first two JSR's to be ratified. InfoQ interviewed Marek Potociar, JSR 339 co-spec lead (Marek and Santiago Pericas-Geertsen are the dynamic duo leading JAX-RS). Marek talks about JAX-RS 2 content, significance and future. Read the full interview here.

  Read the article

• last-modified/etags - to include or not?

  - by Kae Verens

  Google's PageSpeed plugin suggests that a website should include Last-Modified and ETag headers: Specify a cache validator "Resources that do not specify a cache validator cannot be refreshed efficiently. Specify a Last-Modified or ETag header to enable cache validation" However, Apache suggests that by not including them at all, we speed up websites by eliminating If-Modified-Since and If-None-Match requests: http://www.askapache.com/htaccess/apache-speed-last-modified.html these are in direct opposition - which should be implemented? I'm leaning towards Apache's suggestion, as when I want a file cached, I don't want it refreshed.

  Read the article

• Importance Of Correct And Valid Html

  HTML is the foundation of the web! HTML defines the structure and presentation of the website. Therefore, it needs to be clean, correct and validated. HTML document validation is an automated proces... [Author: Joe Haworth - Web Design and Development - April 02, 2010]

  Read the article

• Design for an interface implementation that provides additional functionality

  - by Limbo Exile

  There is a design problem that I came upon while implementing an interface: Let's say there is a Device interface that promises to provide functionalities PerformA() and GetB(). This interface will be implemented for multiple models of a device. What happens if one model has an additional functionality CheckC() which doesn't have equivalents in other implementations? I came up with different solutions, none of which seems to comply with interface design guidelines: To add CheckC() method to the interface and leave one of its implementations empty: interface ISomeDevice { void PerformA(); int GetB(); bool CheckC(); } class DeviceModel1 : ISomeDevice { public void PerformA() { // do stuff } public int GetB() { return 1; } public bool CheckC() { bool res; // assign res a value based on some validation return res; } } class DeviceModel2 : ISomeDevice { public void PerformA() { // do stuff } public int GetB() { return 1; } public bool CheckC() { return true; // without checking anything } } This solution seems incorrect as a class implements an interface without truly implementing all the demanded methods. To leave out CheckC() method from the interface and to use explicit cast in order to call it: interface ISomeDevice { void PerformA(); int GetB(); } class DeviceModel1 : ISomeDevice { public void PerformA() { // do stuff } public int GetB() { return 1; } public bool CheckC() { bool res; // assign res a value based on some validation return res; } } class DeviceModel2 : ISomeDevice { public void PerformA() { // do stuff } public int GetB() { return 1; } } class DeviceManager { private ISomeDevice myDevice; public void ManageDevice(bool newDeviceModel) { myDevice = (newDeviceModel) ? new DeviceModel1() : new DeviceModel2(); myDevice.PerformA(); int b = myDevice.GetB(); if (newDeviceModel) { DeviceModel1 newDevice = myDevice as DeviceModel1; bool c = newDevice.CheckC(); } } } This solution seems to make the interface inconsistent. For the device that supports CheckC(): to add the logic of CheckC() into the logic of another method that is present in the interface. This solution is not always possible. So, what is the correct design to be used in such cases? Maybe creating an interface should be abandoned altogether in favor of another design?

  Read the article

• Should custom data elements be stored as XML or database entries?

  - by meteorainer

  There are a ton of questions like this, but they are mostly very generalized, so I'd like to get some views on my specific usage. General: I'm building a new project on my own in Django. It's focus will be on small businesses. I'd like to make it somewhat customizble for my clients so they can add to their customer/invoice/employee/whatever items. My models would reflect boilerplate items that all ModelX might have. For example: first name last name email address ... Then my user's would be able to add fields for whatever data they might like. I'm still in design phase and am building this myself, so I've got some options. Working on... Right now the 'extra items' models have a FK to the generic model (Customer and CustomerDataPoints for example). All values in the extra data points are stored as char and will be coerced/parced into their actual format at view building. In this build the user could theoretically add whatever values they want, group them in sets and generally access them at will from the views relavent to that model. Pros: Low storage overhead, very extensible, searchable Cons: More sql joins My other option is to use some type of markup, or key-value pairing stored directly onto the boilerplate models. This coul essentially just be any low-overhead method weather XML or literal strings. The view and form generated from the stored data would be taking control of validation and reoganizing on updates. Then it would just dump the data back in as a char/blob/whatever. Something like: <datapoint type='char' value='something' required='true' /> <datapoint type='date' value='01/01/2001' required='false' /> ... Pros: No joins needed, Updates for validation and views are decoupled from data Cons: Much higher storage overhead, limited capacity to search on extra content So my question is: If you didn't live in the contraints impose by your company what method would you use? Why? What benefits or pitfalls do you see down the road for me as a small business trying to help other small businesses? Just to clarify, I am not asking about custom UI elements, those I can handle with forms and template snippets. I'm asking primarily about data storage and retreival of non standardized data relative to a boilerplate model.

  Read the article

• Juju bootstrap fails for Windows Azure

  - by tomconte

  I am trying to play with Juju on Windows Azure. I did the configuration part, however the boostrap fails on a network configuration error: 2013-10-29 10:08:49 ERROR juju supercommand.go:282 PUT request failed: BadRequest - XML Schema validation error in network configuration at line 75,18. (http code 400: Bad Request) How can I troubleshoot? Can I find somewhere the XML file to examine it? Thanks! Thomas.

  Read the article

• Managing Regulated Content in WebCenter: USDM and Oracle Offer a New Part 11 Compliant Solution for Life Sciences

  - by Michael Snow

  Guest post today provided by Oracle partner, USDM  Regulated Content in WebCenterUSDM and Oracle offer a new Part 11 compliant solution for Life Sciences (White Paper) Life science customers now have the ability to take advantage of all of the benefits of Oracle’s WebCenter Content, a global leader in Enterprise Content Management.   For the past year, USDM has been developing best practice compliance solutions to meet regulated content management requirements for 21 CFR Part 11 in WebCenter Content. USDM has been an expert in ECM for life sciences since 1999 and in 2011, certified that WebCenter was a 21CFR Part 11 compliant content management platform (White Paper).  In addition, USDM has built Validation Accelerators Packs for WebCenter to enable life science organizations to quickly and cost effectively validate this world class solution.With the Part 11 certification, Oracle’s WebCenter now provides regulated life science organizations  the ability to manage REGULATORY content in WebCenter, as well as the ability to take advantage of ALL of the additional functionality of WebCenter, including  a complete, open, and integrated portfolio of portal, web experience management, content management and social networking technology.  Here are a few screen shot examples of Part 11 functionality included in the product: E-Sign, E-Sign Rendor, Meta Data History, Audit Trail Report, and Access Reporting. Gone are the days that life science companies have to spend millions of dollars a year to implement, maintain, and validate ECM systems that no longer meet the ever changing business and regulatory requirements.  Life science companies now have the ability to use WebCenter Content, an ECM system with a substantially lower cost of ownership and unsurpassed functionality.Oracle has been #1 in life sciences because of their ability to develop cost effective, easy-to-use, scalable solutions which help increase insight and efficiency to drive growth for their customers.  Adding a world class ECM solution to this product portfolio allows life science organizations the chance to get rid of costly ECM systems that no longer meet their needs and use WebCenter, part of the Oracle Fusion Technology stack, with their other leading enterprise applications.USDM provides:•    Expertise in Life Science ECM Business Processes•    Prebuilt Life Science Configuration in WebCenter •    Validation Accelerator Packs for WebCenterUSDM is very proud to support Oracle’s expanding commitment to Life Sciences…. For more information please contact:  [email protected] Oracle will be exhibiting at DIA 2012 in Philadelphia on June 25-27. Stop by our booth (#2825) to learn more about the advantages of a centralized ECM strategy and see the Oracle WebCenter Content solution, our 21 CFR Part 11 compliant content management platform.

  Read the article

• Using ASP.NET 3.5 ListView in a Web Application

  This tutorial will show an example of how to use the ListView web control featuring data updating and validation before the data is inserted or updated to the MS SQL server database. Examples of how to use ListView controls to retrieve information from the data are featured in the first part of this tutorial which appeared yesterday.... Test Drive the Next Wave of Productivity Find Microsoft Office 2010 and SharePoint 2010 trials, demos, videos, and more.

  Read the article

• Multiple vulnerabilities in fetchmail

  - by Umang_D

  CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2011-3389 Improper Input Validation vulnerability 4.3 fetchmail Solaris 11 11/11 SRU 12.4 CVE-2012-3482 Denial of Service vulnerability 5.0 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Oracle's product distributions.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

  Read the article

• What is your toolset?

  - by MrG

  What tools, free or otherwise do you use to help you with your "webmastering" I'm thinking along the lines of, Link checking, analytics, web stats, page validation, plus anything else you can think of! Personally I use: webmasters tools, google analytics, AWstats I'm looking for anything (free or paid) which maybe hovering under my radar which could be of use. (edit - missed a couple of words out of first line!)

  Read the article

• Microsoft sort un plug-in "Windows Azure pour Eclipse" pour faciliter le déploiement d'applications Java sur son Cloud

  Microsoft sort un plug-in Windows Azure pour Eclipse Pour faciliter le déploiement d'applications Java sur son Cloud Les développeurs Java peuvent désormais utiliser l'environnement de développement Eclipse pour le paquetage et le déploiement des applications Java sur la plate-forme Cloud de Microsoft Windows Azure. Microsoft vient de dévoiler la version CTP (Community Technology Preview) du plugin « Windows Azure for Eclipse ». Ce plugin offre aux utilisateurs une interface graphique pour la configuration et l'accès distant aux applications afin d'assurer leurs maintenances, des fonctions pour la validation du schéma et de l'auto-complétion pour les fichiers de configuration Azure...

  Read the article

• Understanding exceptional cases

  - by Justin

  I've been studying the use of exceptions in various php projects (such as Doctrine and Zend Framework). Exceptions seem to be thrown when unordinary input/state occurs. A perfect example is Doctrine throwing an exception when you try to use a invalid query string. I think the creators of the doctrine api understood that first, you can't query data by using an invalid DQL statement, and a developer should immediately be warned that an error has occurred, rather then letting execution continue with the possibility of an error code going un-checked. I also bet that this simplifies reading the code. I can't think of a situation where you would want to use an invalid DQL statement, except unit testing. Since this is true, it's better to avoid plaguing a bunch of code with null/error checks and use exceptions. I've read in books that exceptions shouldn't be thrown when validating dating user input. I've seen examples where of where the guideline is broken. One example is the Zend framework. If supplying an invalid controller or action name, an exception is thrown. Unlike doctrine, the user has more direct control over this sort of input. I know you can configure an error controller and set up a 404 message or what have you, but I'm curious why they have used an exception in this scenario? I guess you can argue the Zend Framework does not know how to continue processing the quest. One last example Is I wrote a function to return some html based on a given resource type. This resource type is hard-coded and sent when a user interacts with a web site (such as clicking a button to display the form to input data). I don't expect users to be mucking around with the request type. Under normal operating conditions, the resource type should be valid. To clean up some logic, I was going to throw an exception if a particular form wasn't found. This is mainly to find the correct form associated with a resource type so proper validation can occur. Does this sound like a valid use case for an exception? Right now it's pretty trivial, but I do plan to implement a restful consumer and re-using a function to map resources to their validation services would be very useful. I can then catch the exception and based on the consumer, return an error message suitable for the request type...

  Read the article

• State Transition Constraints

  Data Validation in a database is a lot more complex than seeing if a string parameter really is an integer. A commercial world is full of complex rules for sequences of procedures, of fixed or variable lifespans, Warranties, commercial offers and bids. All this requires considerable subtlety to prevent bad data getting in, and if it does, locating and fixing the problem. Joe Celko shows how useful a State transition graph can be, and how essential it can become with the time aspect added.

  Read the article

• ASP.NET AJAX MultiHandleSliderExtender - Slide by Year and Month

  In this tutorial, I will demonstrate how to use the MultiHandleSlider extender to select and display both the year and the month in a range. This control eliminates the need to use four DropDownlist controls to hold the range values and the need for a validation control. Then we will use the Column Chart to display number of cars on Sesame Street based on the selected range values. This chart allows the user to drill down into the details for the selected car brands.

  Read the article

• Bind to Collection Objects with Silverlight 3

  In this third part of the series we will continue to discuss Silverlight 3 data binding. This time however we ll cover more complex topics such as how to bind to collection objects. The fourth and fifth parts will cover how to deal with the validation during data binding not to mention the possible data conversion .... Test Drive the Next Wave of Productivity Find Microsoft Office 2010 and SharePoint 2010 trials, demos, videos, and more.

  Read the article

• Multiple Tomcat vulnerabilities in Oracle Health Sciences LabPas

  - by RitwikGhoshal

  CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2012-2733 Improper Input Validation vulnerability 5.0 Apache Tomcat Oracle Health Sciences LabPas upgrade to Apache Tomcat v6.0.36 CVE-2012-3439 DIGEST authentication implementation issues 5.0 CVE-2012-3546 Security constraints bypass vulnerability 5.5 CVE-2012-4431 CSRF prevention filter bypass vulnerability 4.3 CVE-2012-4534 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 4.3 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Oracle's product distributions.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

  Read the article

• JSR Updates

  - by heathervc

  JSR 349, Bean Validation 1.1, has published a Public Review. The review closes on 12 November. JSR 331, Constraint Programming API, has published a Maintenance Release. JSR 335, Lambda Expressions for the Java Programming Language, has moved to JCP 2.8!  Check out their java.net project. JSR 107, JCACHE - Java Temporary Caching API, has posted their Early Draft Release.  The review closes on 22 November.

  Read the article

• Reliable Storage Systems for SQL Server

  By validating the IO path before commissioning the production database system, and performing ongoing validation through page checksums and DBCC checks, you can hopefully avoid data corruption altogether, or at least nip it in the bud. If corruption occurs, then you have to take the right decisions fast to deal with it. Rod Colledge explains how a pessimistic mindset can be an advantage

  Read the article

• Multiple vulnerabilities in Foomatic

  - by chandan

  CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2011-2697 Improper Input Validation vulnerability 6.8 Foomatic Solaris 11 11/11 SRU 8.5 Solaris 10 Contact Support Solaris 9 Contact Support CVE-2011-2964 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability 6.8 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

  Read the article

• Multiple vulnerabilities in Samba

  - by Ritwik Ghoshal

  CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2014-0244 Input Validation vulnerability 3.3 Samba Solaris 11.2 11.2.1.5.0 CVE-2014-3493 Buffer Errors vulnerability 2.7 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Oracle's product distributions.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

  Read the article

• Multiple vulnerabilities in Pidgin

  - by chandan

  CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2012-2214 Resource Management Errors vulnerability 3.5 Pidgin Solaris 10 SPARC : 147992-04 , x86 : 147993-04 Solaris 11 11/11 SRU 10.5 CVE-2012-2318 Improper Input Validation vulnerability 5.0 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Oracle's product distributions.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

  Read the article

• Biztalk :Tagidentifier for optional records

  - by Mchandak

  I am sure many of us must have faced this issue.Problem:My flat file schema has an optional  record  and marked with a tagidentifier. we would think that the input message without that optional record will pass the schema validation. But by default Biztalk throws an error about the missing record if we try to 'Validate the instance' in the Biztalk mapper.Resolution:On the schema node, set Parser Optimization to “Complexity” instead of thedefault "Speed" optimization.

  Read the article

• Multiple vulnerabilities in PostgreSQL

  - by Umang_D

  CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2012-3488 Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls vulnerability 5.8 PostgreSQL Solaris 10 SPARC : 138822-11 , 138824-11 , 138826-11 x86 : 138823-11 , 138825-11 , 138827-11 CVE-2012-3489 Improper Input Validation vulnerability 5.0 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Oracle's product distributions.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

  Read the article

• Reliable Storage Systems for SQL Server

  By validating the IO path before commissioning the production database system, and performing ongoing validation through page checksums and DBCC checks, you can hopefully avoid data corruption altogether, or at least nip it in the bud. If corruption occurs, then you have to take the right decisions fast to deal with it. Rod Colledge explains how a pessimistic mindset can be an advantage

  Read the article

• Multiple vulnerabilities in Webmin

  - by RitwikGhoshal

  CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2012-2981 Improper Input Validation vulnerability 6.0 Webmin Solaris 10 SPARC: 145006-04 X86: 145007-04 CVE-2012-2982 Arbitrary code execution vulnerability 6.5 CVE-2012-2983 Improper Authentication vulnerability 5.0 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Oracle's product distributions.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111  | Next Page >