Search Results

Search found 46894 results on 1876 pages for 'java native interface'.

Page 1042/1876 | < Previous Page | 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049  | Next Page >

  • Finding an odd perfect number

    - by Coin Bird
    I wrote these two methods to determine if a number is perfect. My prof wants me to combine them to find out if there is an odd perfect number. I know there isn't one(that is known), but I need to actually write the code to prove that. The issue is with my main method. I tested the two test methods. I tried debugging and it gets stuck on the number 5, though I can't figure out why. Here is my code: public class Lab6 { public static void main (String[]args) { int testNum = 3; while (testNum != sum_of_divisors(testNum) && testNum%2 != 0) testNum++; } public static int sum_of_divisors(int numDiv) { int count = 1; int totalDivisors = 0; while (count < numDiv) if (numDiv%count == 0) { totalDivisors = totalDivisors + count; count++; } else count++; return totalDivisors; } public static boolean is_perfect(int numPerfect) { int count = 1; int totalPerfect = 0; while (totalPerfect < numPerfect) { totalPerfect = totalPerfect + count; count++; } if (numPerfect == totalPerfect) return true; else return false; } }

    Read the article

  • Why is this removing all elements from my LinkedList?

    - by Brian
    Why is my remove method removing every element from my Doubly Linked List? If I take out that if/else statements then I can successfully remove middle elements, but elements at the head or tail of the list still remain. However, I added the if/else statements to take care of elements at the head and tail, unfortunately this method now removes every element in my list. What am I do wrong? public void remove(int n) { LinkEntry<E> remove_this = new LinkEntry<E>(); //if nothing comes before remove_this, set the head to equal the element after remove_this if (remove_this.previous == null) head = remove_this.next; //otherwise set the element before remove_this equal to the element after remove_this else remove_this.previous.next = remove_this.next; //if nothing comes after remove_this, set the tail equal to the element before remove_this if (remove_this.next == null) tail = remove_this.previous; //otherwise set the next element's previous pointer to the element before remove_this else remove_this.next.previous = remove_this.previous; //if remove_this is located in the middle of the list, enter this loop until it is //found, then remove it, closing the gap afterwards. int i = 0; for (remove_this = head; remove_this != null; remove_this = remove_this.next) { //if i == n, stop and delete 'remove_this' from the list if (i == n) { //set the previous element's next to the element that comes after remove_this remove_this.previous.next = remove_this.next; //set the element after remove_this' previous pointer to the element before remove_this remove_this.next.previous = remove_this.previous; break; } //if i != n, keep iterating through the list i++; } }

    Read the article

  • Can I un-assign (clear) all fields of an instance?

    - by Roman
    Is there a simple way to clear all fields of an instance from a an instance? I mean, I would like to remove all values assigned to the fields of an instance. ADDED From the main thread I start a window and another thread which controls state of the window (the last thread, for example, display certain panels for a certain period of time). I have a class which contains state of the window (on which stage the user is, which buttons he already clicked). In the end, user may want to start the whole process from the beginning (it is a game). So, I decided. So, if everything is executed from the beginning, I would like to have all parameter to be clean (fresh, unassigned). ADDED The main thread, creates the new object which is executed in a new thread (and the old thread is finished). So, I cannot create a new object from the old thread. I just have a loop in the second thread.

    Read the article

  • Dynamic class annotation

    - by jlanza
    Hi, I want to annotate a class dynamically to make it the more generic as possible: public class Test<T> { @XmlAttribute(name = dynamicvalue) T[] data; public Test(String dynamicvalue) { } } Is there any way to achieve something like this. TA

    Read the article

  • Are instance initializers good or bad?

    - by berry120
    I personally quite like instance initializers - I use them to assign default values to things such as collections so when writing constructors I don't have to remember to assign them the same default values each time. It seems quite elegant to me - avoids annoying NPE's popping up and avoids duplicate code. A private method doesn't seem as nice because a) it can't assign values to final fields, b) it could be run elsewhere in code and c) the method still needs to be explicitly called at the start of each constructor. However, the flip side with others I have spoken to is that they're confusing, some people reading the code might not understand what they do or when they're called and thus they could cause more problems than they solve. Are proper use of these initializers something to be encouraged or avoided? Or is it an "each to their own" case?

    Read the article

  • How to create a datastore.Text object out of an array of dynamically created Strings?

    - by Adrogans
    I am creating a Google App Engine server for a project where I receive a large quantity of data via an HTTP POST request. The data is separated into lines, with 200 characters per line. The number of lines can go into the hundreds, so 10's of thousands of characters total. What I want to do is concatenate all of those lines into a single Text object, since Strings have a maximum length of 500 characters but the Text object can be as large as 1MB. Here is what I thought of so far: public void doPost(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse resp) { ... String[] audioSampleData = new String[numberOfLines]; for (int i = 0; i < numberOfLines; i++) { audioSampleData[i] = req.getReader().readLine(); } com.google.appengine.api.datastore.Text textAudioSampleData = new Text(audioSampleData[0] + audioSampleData[1] + ...); ... } But as you can see, I don't know how to do this without knowing the number of lines before-hand. Is there a way for me to iterate through the String indexes within the Text constructor? I can't seem to find anything on that. Of note is that the Text object can't be modified after being created, and it must have a String as parameter for the constructor. (Documentation here) Is there any way to this? I need all of the data in the String array in one Text object. Many Thanks!

    Read the article

  • How do I create new variables based on the size of a List?

    - by GK
    I have a List with say size n, and i have to dynamically create n variables ie i want to dynamically create the variables depending upon the size of the list. How can i achieve this? Say i have List as List year with n elements in it; then i have to create the n Integer variables from the above list. thanks.

    Read the article

  • Calendar add() vs roll() when do we use it?

    - by Pentium10
    I know add() adds the specified (signed) amount of time to the given time field, based on the calendar's rules. And roll() adds the specified (signed) single unit of time on the given time field without changing larger fields. I can't think of an everyday usage of roll() I would do everything by add(). Can you help me out with examples when do we use roll() and when add()?

    Read the article

  • Solr authentication possible? (or apache port authentication would also work)

    - by Camran
    Currently anybody can access the solr admin page by going to my_ip:8983/solr I can't have it like that, so how can I make it prompt for password or something? I have setup my servers apache2.conf file to prompt for password whenever my site is accessed by www.mydomain.com. But when using another port, the "require password" wont show up. Any ideas how to secure this? Don't point me to the SolrSecurity wiki because it's simply too outdated. I have tried it without luck. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Traversing ORM relationships returns duplicate results

    - by NKing253
    I have 4 tables -- store, catalog_galleries, catalog_images, and catalog_financials. When I traverse the relationship from store --> catalog_galleries --> catalog_images in other words: store.getCatalogGallery().getCatalogImages() I get duplicate records. Does anyone know what could be the cause of this? Any suggestions on where to look? The store table has a OneToOne relationship with catalog_galleries which in turn has a OneToMany relationship with catalog_images and an eager fetch type. The store table also has a OneToMany relationship with catalog_financials.

    Read the article

  • getting panel color

    - by user161004
    I have a program where i have a button to change the background color to red and another button to set back the default panel color. How do i get back the default color for panel??

    Read the article

  • 1:M relationship in Hibernate and cascading operations

    - by EugeneP
    Table SUBCOURSE references COURSE COURSE(id, name) SUBCOURSE(id, course_id, name) So, 1:M. Hibernate generates for Course: @OneToMany(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, mappedBy = "course", cascade = CascadeType.ALL) public Set getSubCourses() { return this.subCourses; } for Subcourse it generates @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY) @JoinColumn(name = "course_id", nullable = false) public Course getCourse() { return this.course; } Now the problem is that cascading does not work as expected. I want to create a collection of SubCourse objects (Set), fill it and then bind it to setSubCourses() of Course object. Though, having ManyToOne thing in a Subcourses table, I need to manually setCourse() before adding to collection on each object. If I do not do so, an exception is raised. What can you recommend me?

    Read the article

  • JDBC delete statement with multiple columns

    - by user1643033
    It says I ended this statement wrong when if I input it into sql plus with just the addition of ; it works perfectly. What am I doing wrong? Statement statement = connection.createStatement(); statement.executeUpdate("delete from aplbuk MODEL = '"+ textField_4.getText() + "'AND year = '" + textField_1.getText() + "' AND Litres = '" + textField_2.getText() + "' AND ENGINE_TYPE = '" + textField_3.getText() + "'"); statement.close();

    Read the article

  • programming help

    - by user208639
    class Person holds personal data Its constructor receives 3 parameters, two Strings representing first and last names and an int representing age public Person(String firstName, String lastName, int age) { its method getName has no parameters and returns a String with format "Lastname, Firstname" its method getAge takes no parameters and returns an int representing the current age its method birthday increases age value by 1 and returns the new age value Create the class Person and paste the whole class into the textbox below public class Person { public Person(String first, String last, int age) { getName = "Lastname, Firstname"; System.out.print(last + first); getAge = age + 1; return getAge; System.out.print(getAge); birthday = age + 1; newAge = birthday; return newAge; } } im getting errors such as "cannot find symbol - variable getName" but when i declare a variable it still not working, i also wanted to ask if i am heading in the right direction or is it all totally wrong? im using a program called BlueJ to work on.

    Read the article

  • String[] initialized by null???

    - by Esmond
    Hi i encountered this problem whereby when i initialized my String[], there seems to be a null in the String[] before i do anything. How do i initialized the String[] to be completely empty,i.e. without the null at the start? The output for the following code is: nullABC nullABC nullABC nullABC nullABC public static void main(String[] args){ String[] inputArr = new String[5]; for (int i = 0; i< inputArr.length; i++){ inputArr[i] += "ABC"; } for (int i = 0; i< inputArr.length; i++){ System.out.println(inputArr[i]); } } }

    Read the article

  • Column moved [finished] event in JTable

    - by chown
    How should I detect that column moved action is finished in JTable? I've added columnModeListener to my column model but the problem is columnMoved method is called every time a column moves (by certain pixels). I don't want this behavior. I just want to detect when the column dragging is finished. columnModel.addColumnModelListener(new TableColumnModelListener() { public void columnAdded(TableColumnModelEvent e) { } public void columnRemoved(TableColumnModelEvent e) { } public void columnMoved(TableColumnModelEvent e) { //this is called so many times //I don't want this, but something like column moved finished event System.out.println("Moved "+e.getFromIndex()+", "+e.getToIndex()); } public void columnMarginChanged(ChangeEvent e) { } public void columnSelectionChanged(ListSelectionEvent e) { } }); I hope it is clear what I'm looking for. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • gmail app 504 server timeout

    - by Hui
    this is the part of code I use for getting info from gmail, it's working alright on my localhost, but somehow when i deploy it online, I got 504 gateway timeout error. Did I missed something in my code? can someone give some advices , thanks a lot public class GetGmail { static String last = null; public static ArrayList run(String username, String password, String lastloggin)throws Exception { ArrayList result = null; System.out.println("Getting Gmail......"); last = lastloggin; Properties props = System.getProperties(); props.setProperty("mail.store.protocol", "imaps"); try { Session session = Session.getDefaultInstance(props, null); Store store = session.getStore("imaps"); store.connect("imap.googlemail.com", username, password); result = readMessage(store); store.close(); } catch (NoSuchProviderException e) { e.printStackTrace(); return null; } catch (MessagingException e) { e.printStackTrace(); return null; } return result; } }

    Read the article

  • Are hashCodes unique for Strings?

    - by Batty
    Recently, I came across a piece of code, where Map<Integer, String> is used, where Integer(key) is hashCode of some string and String value corresponding to that. Is this right thing to do? Because now, equals will not be called for the String when calling get. (get is also done using hashCode() method on String object. Or, hashCode(s) are unique for unique Strings? I checked equals od String class. There is logic written for that. I am confused.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049  | Next Page >