Search Results

Search found 5390 results on 216 pages for 'ssl vpn'.

Page 105/216 | < Previous Page | 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112  | Next Page >

• Is there a standard way to run a x509 key server?

  - by chotchki

  Does anyone know of a project / product that has standardized how to access/download x509/SSL certificates over HTTP? I have seen RFC 4387 but haven't found anyone who implements it. Basically, I am trying to setup a key server for an internal application. So short of implementing my own, does anyone have any suggestions?

  Read the article

• Does the majority A-grade browsers cache content over https to disk?

  - by nimo9367

  I have read somewhere that javascript and css files that only get cached in memory sooner or later get pushed out by other content. Is this true? Are there any other issues regarding cashing SSL-objects?

  Read the article

• Open SSL without SHA1

  - by Hellnar

  Is there any way to use Open SSL without any SHA1 hash functions and using one of SHA2 functions instead of it? I think firstly, I should find all the functions that call SHA1 algorithm, and I should understand why SHA1 is still used. While changing the hash function, the bits are different in SHA1 and SHA2 so it may cause some problems. It confuses me...

  Read the article

• ASP.NET - consume web service - https only - how?

  - by Steve

  I have web services built with ASP.NET and ASP.NET clients consuming them. When consuming the webservices, how would I to force the clients to use https? I don't want to force the whole site to use https by turning on require SSL in IIS. Can I use the IIS7 URL rewrite module to re-route http requests to https?

  Read the article

• WebSphere Plugin Keystore Unreadable by IHS - GSK_ERROR_BAD_KEYFILE_PASSWORD

  - by Seer

  Running WAS 6.1.xx in a network deployment. The IBM provided plugin keystore's "plugin-key.kdb" password expires on april 26th along with the personal cert inside it. So no problem right? Create new cert and set new password on the kdb, restash the password and off we go! Well no! On restart of IBM HTTP Server we see [Tue Apr 24 14:11:22 2012] 00b00004 00000001 - ERROR: lib_security: logSSLError: str_security (gsk error 408): GSK_ERROR_BAD_KEYFILE_PASSWORD [Tue Apr 24 14:11:22 2012] 00b00004 00000001 - ERROR: lib_security: initializeSecurity: Failed to initialize GSK environment [Tue Apr 24 14:11:22 2012] 00b00004 00000001 - ERROR: ws_transport: transportInitializeSecurity: Failed to initialize security [Tue Apr 24 14:11:22 2012] 00b00004 00000001 - ERROR: ws_server: serverAddTransport: Failed to initialize security [Tue Apr 24 14:11:22 2012] 00b00004 00000001 - ERROR: ws_server: serverAddTransport: HTTPS Transport is skipped [Tue Apr 24 14:11:22 2012] 00b00004 00000001 - ERROR: lib_security: logSSLError: str_security (gsk error 408): GSK_ERROR_BAD_KEYFILE_PASSWORD [Tue Apr 24 14:11:22 2012] 00b00004 00000001 - ERROR: lib_security: initializeSecurity: Failed to initialize GSK environment [Tue Apr 24 14:11:22 2012] 00b00004 00000001 - ERROR: ws_transport: transportInitializeSecurity: Failed to initialize security [Tue Apr 24 14:11:22 2012] 00b00004 00000001 - ERROR: ws_server: serverAddTransport: Failed to initialize security [Tue Apr 24 14:11:22 2012] 00b00004 00000001 - ERROR: ws_server: serverAddTransport: HTTPS Transport is skipped Here is the thing ... I can open the keystore using the new password with ikeyman and keytool. Using some "slightly dodgy" script, I can reverse the stash file and see that indeed the new password is set. Then, even if I restore the old keystore files (plugin-key.kdb,plugin-key.crl,plugin-key.sth,plugin-key.rdb) they no longer work either! So it must be permissions right? Well the permissions are the same as before, if I switch to apache user I can browse right through to the files and read them. I have even chown'ed them to apache:apache and/or chmod 777 and still its the same error! Does anyone have a clue what is going on here? Its pretty urgent as our site will be without HTTPS in a couple of days if this isn't resolved - thats bad for a retail web site :)

  Read the article

• openconnect on ubuntu 14.04LTS I get "XML response has no "auth" node"

  - by Jas

  I run openconnect to connect to juniper as following $ openconnect --version OpenConnect version v5.02 Using GnuTLS. Features present: PKCS#11, TOTP software token, DTLS (using OpenSSL) sudo openconnect -v -u=myuser --no-xmlpost --no-proxy https://myserver Got HTTP response: HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 07:24:03 GMT x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN Pragma: no-cache Cache-Control: no-store Expires: -1 Transfer-Encoding: chunked HTTP body chunked (-2) XML response has no "auth" node Failed to obtain WebVPN cookie can anyone help please?

  Read the article

• how to build openvpn without libpam?

  - by hugemeow

  Since I have no root privilege to install libpam, I failed to run ./configure. So is there any method with which I can build openvpn without libpam? checking for OPENSSL_CRYPTO... yes checking for OPENSSL_SSL... yes checking for EVP_CIPHER_CTX_set_key_length... yes checking for ENGINE_load_builtin_engines... yes checking for ENGINE_register_all_complete... yes checking for ENGINE_cleanup... yes checking for ssl_init in -lpolarssl... no checking for aes_crypt_cbc in -lpolarssl... no checking for lzo1x_1_15_compress in -llzo2... no checking for lzo1x_1_15_compress in -llzo... no checking for PKCS11_HELPER... no checking git checkout... yes configure: error: libpam required but missing What's more, why I cannot disable libpam option? [mirror@innov openvpn]$ ./configure --help | grep libpam --enable-pam-dlopen dlopen libpam [default=no] C compiler flags for libpam LIBPAM_LIBS linker flags for libpam

  Read the article

• Handshake violation when trying to access one website

  - by Miguel

  I have a TZ 190 Wireless Enhanced with SonicOS Enhanced 4.2.1.0-20e. Yesterday, people could access without any problems a bank website wich uses HTTPS. Today, it is imposible to access only that website, every other ones works without problems. When checking the log message filtering to my IP only, this is what appears and I suspect is the cause of this problem, because all other websites are working: Priority: Notice Category: Network Access Message: TCP handshake violation detected; TCP connection dropped Source: X.Y.Z.3, 51997, LAN (admin) Destination: 200.14.232.18, 443, WAN Notes: Handshake Timeout Where X.Y.Z.3 is my local IP. I've tried to change TCP Settings under Firewall option, and activated this options with no success: Enforce strict TCP compliance with RFC 793 and RFC 1122 and Enable TCP checksum enforcement I've also tried to find the MTU and at first I got: Packet needs to be fragmented but DF set But when I lower the value of ping -f -l to 1468 I got: Request timeout. Also I deactivate CFS in lan and wan zones. Nothing works. Can you please help me? Any Ideas?

  Read the article

• Can't get the L2TP IPSEC up and running

  - by Maciej Swic

  i have an Ubuntu 11.10 (oneiric) server running on a ReadyNAS. Im planning to use this to accept ipsec+l2tp connections through a router. However, the connection is failing somewhere half through. Using Openswan IPsec U2.6.28/K3.0.0-12-generic and trying to connect with an iOS 5 iPhone 4S. This is how far i can get: auth.log: Jan 19 13:54:11 ubuntu pluto[1990]: added connection description "PSK" Jan 19 13:54:11 ubuntu pluto[1990]: added connection description "L2TP-PSK-NAT" Jan 19 13:54:11 ubuntu pluto[1990]: added connection description "L2TP-PSK-noNAT" Jan 19 13:54:11 ubuntu pluto[1990]: added connection description "passthrough-for-non-l2tp" Jan 19 13:54:11 ubuntu pluto[1990]: listening for IKE messages Jan 19 13:54:11 ubuntu pluto[1990]: NAT-Traversal: Trying new style NAT-T Jan 19 13:54:11 ubuntu pluto[1990]: NAT-Traversal: ESPINUDP(1) setup failed for new style NAT-T family IPv4 (errno=19) Jan 19 13:54:11 ubuntu pluto[1990]: NAT-Traversal: Trying old style NAT-T Jan 19 13:54:11 ubuntu pluto[1990]: adding interface eth0/eth0 192.168.19.99:500 Jan 19 13:54:11 ubuntu pluto[1990]: adding interface eth0/eth0 192.168.19.99:4500 Jan 19 13:54:11 ubuntu pluto[1990]: adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:500 Jan 19 13:54:11 ubuntu pluto[1990]: adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:4500 Jan 19 13:54:11 ubuntu pluto[1990]: adding interface lo/lo ::1:500 Jan 19 13:54:11 ubuntu pluto[1990]: adding interface eth0/eth0 2001:470:28:81:a00:27ff:* Jan 19 13:54:11 ubuntu pluto[1990]: loading secrets from "/etc/ipsec.secrets" Jan 19 13:54:11 ubuntu pluto[1990]: loading secrets from "/var/lib/openswan/ipsec.secrets.inc" Jan 19 14:04:31 ubuntu pluto[1990]: packet from 95.*.*.233:500: received Vendor ID payload [RFC 3947] method set to=109 Jan 19 14:04:31 ubuntu pluto[1990]: packet from 95.*.*.233:500: received Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike] method set to=110 Jan 19 14:04:31 ubuntu pluto[1990]: packet from 95.*.*.233:500: ignoring unknown Vendor ID payload [8f8d83826d246b6fc7a8a6a428c11de8] Jan 19 14:04:31 ubuntu pluto[1990]: packet from 95.*.*.233:500: ignoring unknown Vendor ID payload [439b59f8ba676c4c7737ae22eab8f582] Jan 19 14:04:31 ubuntu pluto[1990]: packet from 95.*.*.233:500: ignoring unknown Vendor ID payload [4d1e0e136deafa34c4f3ea9f02ec7285] Jan 19 14:04:31 ubuntu pluto[1990]: packet from 95.*.*.233:500: ignoring unknown Vendor ID payload [80d0bb3def54565ee84645d4c85ce3ee] Jan 19 14:04:31 ubuntu pluto[1990]: packet from 95.*.*.233:500: ignoring unknown Vendor ID payload [9909b64eed937c6573de52ace952fa6b] Jan 19 14:04:31 ubuntu pluto[1990]: packet from 95.*.*.233:500: received Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-03] meth=108, but already using method 110 Jan 19 14:04:31 ubuntu pluto[1990]: packet from 95.*.*.233:500: received Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02] meth=107, but already using method 110 Jan 19 14:04:31 ubuntu pluto[1990]: packet from 95.*.*.233:500: received Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n] meth=106, but already using method 110 Jan 19 14:04:31 ubuntu pluto[1990]: packet from 95.*.*.233:500: received Vendor ID payload [Dead Peer Detection] Jan 19 14:04:31 ubuntu pluto[1990]: "PSK"[1] 95.*.*.233 #1: responding to Main Mode from unknown peer 95.*.*.233 Jan 19 14:04:31 ubuntu pluto[1990]: "PSK"[1] 95.*.*.233 #1: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R0 to state STATE_MAIN_R1 Jan 19 14:04:31 ubuntu pluto[1990]: "PSK"[1] 95.*.*.233 #1: STATE_MAIN_R1: sent MR1, expecting MI2 Jan 19 14:04:33 ubuntu pluto[1990]: "PSK"[1] 95.*.*.233 #1: NAT-Traversal: Result using draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike (MacOS X): both are NATed Jan 19 14:04:33 ubuntu pluto[1990]: "PSK"[1] 95.*.*.233 #1: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R1 to state STATE_MAIN_R2 Jan 19 14:04:33 ubuntu pluto[1990]: "PSK"[1] 95.*.*.233 #1: STATE_MAIN_R2: sent MR2, expecting MI3 Jan 19 14:05:03 ubuntu pluto[1990]: ERROR: asynchronous network error report on eth0 (sport=500) for message to 95.*.*.233 port 500, complainant 95.*.*.233: Connection refused [errno 111, origin ICMP type 3 code 3 (not authenticated)] Router config UDP 500, 1701 and 4500 forwarded to 192.168.19.99 (Ubuntu server for ipsec). Ipsec passthrough enabled. /etc/ipsec.conf # /etc/ipsec.conf - Openswan IPsec configuration file # This file: /usr/share/doc/openswan/ipsec.conf-sample # # Manual: ipsec.conf.5 version 2.0 # conforms to second version of ipsec.conf specification config setup nat_traversal=yes #charonstart=yes #plutostart=yes protostack=netkey conn PSK authby=secret forceencaps=yes pfs=no auto=add keyingtries=3 dpdtimeout=60 dpdaction=clear rekey=no left=192.168.19.99 leftnexthop=192.168.19.1 leftprotoport=17/1701 right=%any rightprotoport=17/%any rightsubnet=vhost:%priv,%no dpddelay=10 #dpdtimeout=10 #dpdaction=clear include /etc/ipsec.d/l2tp-psk.conf /etc/ipsec.d/l2tp-psk.conf conn L2TP-PSK-NAT rightsubnet=vhost:%priv also=L2TP-PSK-noNAT conn L2TP-PSK-noNAT # # PreSharedSecret needs to be specified in /etc/ipsec.secrets as # YourIPAddress %any: "sharedsecret" authby=secret pfs=no auto=add keyingtries=3 # we cannot rekey for %any, let client rekey rekey=no # Set ikelifetime and keylife to same defaults windows has ikelifetime=8h keylife=1h # l2tp-over-ipsec is transport mode type=transport # left=192.168.19.99 # # For updated Windows 2000/XP clients, # to support old clients as well, use leftprotoport=17/%any leftprotoport=17/1701 # # The remote user. # right=%any # Using the magic port of "0" means "any one single port". This is # a work around required for Apple OSX clients that use a randomly # high port, but propose "0" instead of their port. rightprotoport=17/%any dpddelay=10 dpdtimeout=10 dpdaction=clear conn passthrough-for-non-l2tp type=passthrough left=192.168.19.99 leftnexthop=192.168.19.1 right=0.0.0.0 rightsubnet=0.0.0.0/0 auto=route /etc/ipsec.secrets include /var/lib/openswan/ipsec.secrets.inc %any %any: PSK "my-key" 192.168.19.99 %any: PSK "my-key" /etc/xl2tpd/xl2tpd.conf [global] debug network = yes debug tunnel = yes ipsec saref = no listen-addr = 192.168.19.99 [lns default] ip range = 192.168.19.201-192.168.19.220 local ip = 192.168.19.99 require chap = yes refuse chap = no refuse pap = no require authentication = no ppp debug = yes pppoptfile = /etc/ppp/options.xl2tpd length bit = yes /etc/ppp/options.xl2tpd pcp-accept-local ipcp-accept-remote noccp auth crtscts idle 1800 mtu 1410 mru 1410 defaultroute debug lock proxyarp connect-delay 5000 ipcp-accept-local /etc/ppp/chap-secrets # Secrets for authentication using CHAP # client server secret IP addresses maciekish * my-secret * * maciekish my-secret * I can't seem to find the problem. Other ipsec connections to other hosts work from the network im currently at.

  Read the article

• untrusted (self-sign) certificate on android browser

  - by Basiclife

  Hi all, Apologies for the brevity of this question but due to an unfortunate series of events, I've managed to brick my PC so am posting from my phone... We've just set up Windows Small Business Server 2008 at work which has an external web portal accessible via HTTPS. We haven't yet bought?installed any certificates. The portal provides access to email, sharepoint, remote desktop, etc.... (I'm aware some of these are never going to work on the phone) From firefox / other desktop browsers, this displays an "untrusted cert' warning which I can choose to ignore. When browsing from my mobile I get a popup notification which says. "A secure connection could not be established" when I OK this (my only option) I see the standard android-generated "unable to load page - has it moved?" Page. Does anyone know of a way to either accept the certificate temporarily or allow untrusted certificates generally? I'm aware that the latter option is non-ideal in the mid to long term but at the moment, I need to access the portal and am willing to either toggle settings as/when required or forego using the mobile for banking, etc... to mitigate my risk. Thanks in advance for any help you can provide and apologies again for brevity In case it helps I'm on the G1 running android 1.6 using the default browser

  Read the article

• OpenVPN - Ubuntu 10.04 - Client Can't Connect to Server - Linux Route Add Command Failed

  - by nicorellius

  I suppose this could be asked on Server Fault as well, but it is specific to the client so I thought I'd start here. I have keys for access to an OpenVPN server already in place. I have used these keys to connect already, but using a Windows XP machine. On a Ubuntu machine, I installed OpenVPN and then configured client.conf file so that I could run: sudo openvpn --config client.conf And it seems correct but I still can't connect and get these errors and lines of output: Mon May 31 14:34:57 2010 ERROR: Linux route add command failed: external program exited with error status: 7 Mon May 31 14:34:57 2010 /sbin/route add -net 10.8.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 gw 10.8.0.17 SIOCADDRT: File exists Mon May 31 14:34:57 2010 ERROR: Linux route add command failed: external program exited with error status: 7 Mon May 31 14:34:57 2010 Initialization Sequence Completed I searched the net for forums and ideas and tried some file moving and renaming but still ended up in the same place.

  Read the article

• vpnc Not Adding Internal DNS Servers to resolv.conf

  - by AJ

  I'm trying to setup vpnc on Ubuntu. When I run vpnc, my resolv.conf file does not get changed. It still only contains my ISP's name servers: #@VPNC_GENERATED@ -- this file is generated by vpnc # and will be overwritten by vpnc # as long as the above mark is intact nameserver 65.32.5.111 nameserver 65.32.5.112 Here is my /etc/network/interfaces: auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 192.168.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway 192.168.1.1 dns-nameservers 65.32.5.111 65.32.5.112 Any tips on how to troubleshoot/resolve this? Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• certutil -ping fails with 30 seconds timeout - what to do?

  - by mark

  The certificate store on my Win7 box is constantly hanging. Observe: C:\1.cmd C:\certutil -? | findstr /i ping -ping -- Ping Active Directory Certificate Services Request interface -pingadmin -- Ping Active Directory Certificate Services Admin interface C:\set PROMPT=$P($t)$G C:\(13:04:28.57)certutil -ping CertUtil: -ping command FAILED: 0x80070002 (WIN32: 2) CertUtil: The system cannot find the file specified. C:\(13:04:58.68)certutil -pingadmin CertUtil: -pingadmin command FAILED: 0x80070002 (WIN32: 2) CertUtil: The system cannot find the file specified. C:\(13:05:28.79)set PROMPT=$P$G C:\ Explanations: The first command shows you that there are –ping and –pingadmin parameters to certutil Trying any ping parameter fails with 30 seconds timeout (the current time is seen in the prompt) This is a serious problem. It screws all the secure communication in my app. If anyone knows how this can be fixed - please share. Thanks. P.S. 1.cmd is simply a batch of these commands: certutil -? | findstr /i ping set PROMPT=$P($t)$G certutil -ping certutil -pingadmin set PROMPT=$P$G EDIT1 I have succeeded to pin down the single windows API that causes the problem - DsGetDcName According to the windbg, the certutil -ping invokes it like so: PDOMAIN_CONTROLLER_INFO pdci; DWORD ret = ::DsGetDcName(NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, DS_DIRECTORY_SERVICE_PREFERRED, &pdci); On my workstation it times out for 30 seconds and then returns error code 1355, which is ERROR_NO_SUCH_DOMAIN No domain controller is available for the specified domain or the domain does not exist. On another machine, which is accidentally a windows server 2003, it returns almost immediately with the correct domain controller name inside the returned DOMAIN_CONTROLLER_INFO structure. Now the question is what is missing on my workstation for that API to find the correct domain controller?

  Read the article

• How to Route Traffic in Case PPTP Remote Client is on Same Subnet as Server

  - by Marcus Cole

  I've a PPTP server setup on my local home network (192.168.1.0/24, pfSense). Now sometimes when I'm away and want to connect remotely my client (Windows 7) is also on the same network because e.g. the hotel has set it up the same way. Thus the connection works, but I can't reach any PC on my home network because everything is routed directly to the client local router which is in the same subnet. Is there a way to work around this by messing with a configuration or adapting Windows routing table, i.e. without modifying either network?

  Read the article

• Yum Update Failing mod_ssl and glibc_devel

  - by Kerry

  Any ideas on how to get this to not fail? # yum update Freeing read locks for locker 0x82: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0x84: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0x85: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0x86: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0x87: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0x9a: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0x9c: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0x9d: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0x9e: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0x9f: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0xa0: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0xa1: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0xa2: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0xa3: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0xa4: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0xa5: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0xa6: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0xa7: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0xa8: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0xa9: 4189/140342084876032 Freeing read locks for locker 0xaa: 4189/140342084876032 Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.hmc.edu * epel: mirrors.kernel.org * extras: centos.mirror.freedomvoice.com * updates: mirrors.sonic.net Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies There are unfinished transactions remaining. You might consider running yum-complete-transaction first to finish them. The program yum-complete-transaction is found in the yum-utils package. --> Running transaction check ---> Package device-mapper-persistent-data.x86_64 0:0.2.8-2.el6 will be updated ---> Package device-mapper-persistent-data.x86_64 0:0.2.8-4.el6_5 will be an update ---> Package glibc-headers.x86_64 0:2.12-1.132.el6 will be updated --> Processing Dependency: glibc-headers = 2.12-1.132.el6 for package: glibc-devel-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64 ---> Package glibc-headers.x86_64 0:2.12-1.132.el6_5.2 will be an update ---> Package httpd.x86_64 0:2.2.15-29.el6.centos will be updated --> Processing Dependency: httpd = 2.2.15-29.el6.centos for package: 1:mod_ssl-2.2.15-29.el6.centos.x86_64 ---> Package httpd.x86_64 0:2.2.15-30.el6.centos will be an update ---> Package kernel.x86_64 0:2.6.32-431.17.1.el6 will be installed ---> Package kernel-devel.x86_64 0:2.6.32-431.17.1.el6 will be installed ---> Package selinux-policy-targeted.noarch 0:3.7.19-231.el6_5.1 will be updated ---> Package selinux-policy-targeted.noarch 0:3.7.19-231.el6_5.3 will be an update --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: 1:mod_ssl-2.2.15-29.el6.centos.x86_64 (@base) Requires: httpd = 2.2.15-29.el6.centos Removing: httpd-2.2.15-29.el6.centos.x86_64 (@base) httpd = 2.2.15-29.el6.centos Updated By: httpd-2.2.15-30.el6.centos.x86_64 (updates) httpd = 2.2.15-30.el6.centos Error: Package: glibc-devel-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64 (@base) Requires: glibc-headers = 2.12-1.132.el6 Removing: glibc-headers-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64 (@base) glibc-headers = 2.12-1.132.el6 Updated By: glibc-headers-2.12-1.132.el6_5.2.x86_64 (updates) glibc-headers = 2.12-1.132.el6_5.2 Available: glibc-headers-2.12-1.132.el6_5.1.x86_64 (updates) glibc-headers = 2.12-1.132.el6_5.1 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem ** Found 34 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows: audit-2.2-4.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with audit-2.2-2.el6.x86_64 audit-libs-2.2-4.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with audit-libs-2.2-2.el6.x86_64 curl-7.19.7-37.el6_5.3.x86_64 is a duplicate with curl-7.19.7-37.el6_4.x86_64 device-mapper-multipath-0.4.9-72.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with device-mapper-multipath-0.4.9-72.el6_5.1.x86_64 device-mapper-multipath-libs-0.4.9-72.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with device-mapper-multipath-libs-0.4.9-72.el6_5.1.x86_64 2:ethtool-3.5-1.4.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with 2:ethtool-3.5-1.2.el6_5.x86_64 glibc-2.12-1.132.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with glibc-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64 glibc-common-2.12-1.132.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with glibc-common-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64 glibc-devel-2.12-1.132.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with glibc-devel-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64 glibc-devel-2.12-1.132.el6_5.2.x86_64 has missing requires of glibc-headers = ('0', '2.12', '1.132.el6_5.2') gnutls-2.8.5-14.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with gnutls-2.8.5-13.el6_5.x86_64 httpd-2.2.15-29.el6.centos.x86_64 has missing requires of httpd-tools = ('0', '2.2.15', '29.el6.centos') httpd-manual-2.2.15-30.el6.centos.noarch has missing requires of httpd = ('0', '2.2.15', '30.el6.centos') iproute-2.6.32-32.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with iproute-2.6.32-31.el6.x86_64 kernel-firmware-2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.noarch is a duplicate with kernel-firmware-2.6.32-431.11.2.el6.noarch kernel-headers-2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with kernel-headers-2.6.32-431.11.2.el6.x86_64 kpartx-0.4.9-72.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with kpartx-0.4.9-72.el6_5.1.x86_64 krb5-libs-1.10.3-15.el6_5.1.x86_64 is a duplicate with krb5-libs-1.10.3-10.el6_4.6.x86_64 libblkid-2.17.2-12.14.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with libblkid-2.17.2-12.14.el6.x86_64 libcurl-7.19.7-37.el6_5.3.x86_64 is a duplicate with libcurl-7.19.7-37.el6_4.x86_64 libcurl-devel-7.19.7-37.el6_5.3.x86_64 is a duplicate with libcurl-devel-7.19.7-37.el6_4.x86_64 libtasn1-2.3-6.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with libtasn1-2.3-3.el6_2.1.x86_64 libuuid-2.17.2-12.14.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with libuuid-2.17.2-12.14.el6.x86_64 libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6_5.1.x86_64 is a duplicate with libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6.x86_64 mdadm-3.2.6-7.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with mdadm-3.2.6-7.el6.x86_64 1:mod_ssl-2.2.15-30.el6.centos.x86_64 is a duplicate with 1:mod_ssl-2.2.15-29.el6.centos.x86_64 1:mod_ssl-2.2.15-30.el6.centos.x86_64 has missing requires of httpd = ('0', '2.2.15', '30.el6.centos') nss-softokn-3.14.3-10.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with nss-softokn-3.14.3-9.el6.x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.7.x86_64 is a duplicate with openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.4.x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.14.x86_64 is a duplicate with openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.7.x86_64 openssl-devel-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.14.x86_64 is a duplicate with openssl-devel-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.7.x86_64 selinux-policy-3.7.19-231.el6_5.3.noarch is a duplicate with selinux-policy-3.7.19-231.el6_5.1.noarch tzdata-2014d-1.el6.noarch is a duplicate with tzdata-2014b-1.el6.noarch util-linux-ng-2.17.2-12.14.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with util-linux-ng-2.17.2-12.14.el6.x86_64 UPDATE I installed and ran yum-complete-transaction as requested, it finished some things and suggested I run package-cleanup --problems, which yielded this: package-cleanup --problems Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Package httpd-manual-2.2.15-30.el6.centos.noarch requires httpd = ('0', '2.2.15', '30.el6.centos') Package httpd-2.2.15-29.el6.centos.x86_64 requires httpd-tools = ('0', '2.2.15', '29.el6.centos') Package mod_ssl-2.2.15-30.el6.centos.x86_64 requires httpd = ('0', '2.2.15', '30.el6.centos') Package glibc-devel-2.12-1.132.el6_5.2.x86_64 requires glibc-headers = ('0', '2.12', '1.132.el6_5.2') I'm definitely not a sys-admin, what would be the next step? UPDATE 2 I ran yum distro-sync: # yum distro-sync Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.hmc.edu * epel: mirrors.kernel.org * extras: centos.mirror.freedomvoice.com * updates: mirrors.sonic.net Setting up Distribution Synchronization Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package glibc-headers.x86_64 0:2.12-1.132.el6 will be updated --> Processing Dependency: glibc-headers = 2.12-1.132.el6 for package: glibc-devel-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64 ---> Package glibc-headers.x86_64 0:2.12-1.132.el6_5.2 will be an update ---> Package httpd.x86_64 0:2.2.15-29.el6.centos will be updated --> Processing Dependency: httpd = 2.2.15-29.el6.centos for package: 1:mod_ssl-2.2.15-29.el6.centos.x86_64 ---> Package httpd.x86_64 0:2.2.15-30.el6.centos will be an update --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: 1:mod_ssl-2.2.15-29.el6.centos.x86_64 (@base) Requires: httpd = 2.2.15-29.el6.centos Removing: httpd-2.2.15-29.el6.centos.x86_64 (@base) httpd = 2.2.15-29.el6.centos Updated By: httpd-2.2.15-30.el6.centos.x86_64 (updates) httpd = 2.2.15-30.el6.centos Error: Package: glibc-devel-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64 (@base) Requires: glibc-headers = 2.12-1.132.el6 Removing: glibc-headers-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64 (@base) glibc-headers = 2.12-1.132.el6 Updated By: glibc-headers-2.12-1.132.el6_5.2.x86_64 (updates) glibc-headers = 2.12-1.132.el6_5.2 Available: glibc-headers-2.12-1.132.el6_5.1.x86_64 (updates) glibc-headers = 2.12-1.132.el6_5.1 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem ** Found 34 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows: audit-2.2-4.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with audit-2.2-2.el6.x86_64 audit-libs-2.2-4.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with audit-libs-2.2-2.el6.x86_64 curl-7.19.7-37.el6_5.3.x86_64 is a duplicate with curl-7.19.7-37.el6_4.x86_64 device-mapper-multipath-0.4.9-72.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with device-mapper-multipath-0.4.9-72.el6_5.1.x86_64 device-mapper-multipath-libs-0.4.9-72.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with device-mapper-multipath-libs-0.4.9-72.el6_5.1.x86_64 2:ethtool-3.5-1.4.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with 2:ethtool-3.5-1.2.el6_5.x86_64 glibc-2.12-1.132.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with glibc-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64 glibc-common-2.12-1.132.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with glibc-common-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64 glibc-devel-2.12-1.132.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with glibc-devel-2.12-1.132.el6.x86_64 glibc-devel-2.12-1.132.el6_5.2.x86_64 has missing requires of glibc-headers = ('0', '2.12', '1.132.el6_5.2') gnutls-2.8.5-14.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with gnutls-2.8.5-13.el6_5.x86_64 httpd-2.2.15-29.el6.centos.x86_64 has missing requires of httpd-tools = ('0', '2.2.15', '29.el6.centos') httpd-manual-2.2.15-30.el6.centos.noarch has missing requires of httpd = ('0', '2.2.15', '30.el6.centos') iproute-2.6.32-32.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with iproute-2.6.32-31.el6.x86_64 kernel-firmware-2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.noarch is a duplicate with kernel-firmware-2.6.32-431.11.2.el6.noarch kernel-headers-2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64 is a duplicate with kernel-headers-2.6.32-431.11.2.el6.x86_64 kpartx-0.4.9-72.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with kpartx-0.4.9-72.el6_5.1.x86_64 krb5-libs-1.10.3-15.el6_5.1.x86_64 is a duplicate with krb5-libs-1.10.3-10.el6_4.6.x86_64 libblkid-2.17.2-12.14.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with libblkid-2.17.2-12.14.el6.x86_64 libcurl-7.19.7-37.el6_5.3.x86_64 is a duplicate with libcurl-7.19.7-37.el6_4.x86_64 libcurl-devel-7.19.7-37.el6_5.3.x86_64 is a duplicate with libcurl-devel-7.19.7-37.el6_4.x86_64 libtasn1-2.3-6.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with libtasn1-2.3-3.el6_2.1.x86_64 libuuid-2.17.2-12.14.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with libuuid-2.17.2-12.14.el6.x86_64 libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6_5.1.x86_64 is a duplicate with libxml2-2.7.6-14.el6.x86_64 mdadm-3.2.6-7.el6_5.2.x86_64 is a duplicate with mdadm-3.2.6-7.el6.x86_64 1:mod_ssl-2.2.15-30.el6.centos.x86_64 is a duplicate with 1:mod_ssl-2.2.15-29.el6.centos.x86_64 1:mod_ssl-2.2.15-30.el6.centos.x86_64 has missing requires of httpd = ('0', '2.2.15', '30.el6.centos') nss-softokn-3.14.3-10.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with nss-softokn-3.14.3-9.el6.x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.7.x86_64 is a duplicate with openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.4.x86_64 openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.14.x86_64 is a duplicate with openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.7.x86_64 openssl-devel-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.14.x86_64 is a duplicate with openssl-devel-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.7.x86_64 selinux-policy-3.7.19-231.el6_5.3.noarch is a duplicate with selinux-policy-3.7.19-231.el6_5.1.noarch tzdata-2014d-1.el6.noarch is a duplicate with tzdata-2014b-1.el6.noarch util-linux-ng-2.17.2-12.14.el6_5.x86_64 is a duplicate with util-linux-ng-2.17.2-12.14.el6.x86_64

  Read the article

• VPN iptables Forwarding: Net-to-net

  - by Mike Holler

  I've tried to look elsewhere on this site but I couldn't find anything matching this problem. Right now I have an ipsec tunnel open between our local network and a remote network. Currently, the local box running Openswan ipsec with the tunnel open can ping the remote ipsec box and any of the other computers in the remote network. When logged into on of the remote computers, I can ping any box in our local network. That's what works, this is what doesn't: I can't ping any of the remote computers via a local machine that is not the ipsec box. Here's a diagram of our network: [local ipsec box] ----------\ \ [arbitrary local computer] --[local gateway/router] -- [internet] -- [remote ipsec box] -- [arbitrary remote computer] The local ipsec box and the arbitrary local computer have no direct contact, instead they communicate through the gateway/router. The router has been set up to forward requests from local computers for the remote subnet to the ipsec box. This works. The problem is the ipsec box doesn't forward anything. Whenever an arbitrary local computer pings something on the remote subnet, this is the response: [user@localhost ~]# ping 172.16.53.12 PING 172.16.53.12 (172.16.53.12) 56(84) bytes of data. From 10.31.14.16 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Prohibited From 10.31.14.16 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Prohibited From 10.31.14.16 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Prohibited Here's the traceroute: [root@localhost ~]# traceroute 172.16.53.12 traceroute to 172.16.53.12 (172.16.53.12), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 router.address.net (10.31.14.1) 0.374 ms 0.566 ms 0.651 ms 2 10.31.14.16 (10.31.14.16) 2.068 ms 2.081 ms 2.100 ms 3 10.31.14.16 (10.31.14.16) 2.132 ms !X 2.272 ms !X 2.312 ms !X That's the IP for our ipsec box it's reaching, but it's not being forwarded. On the IPSec box I have enabled IP Forwarding in /etc/sysctl.conf net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1 And I have tried to set up IPTables to forward: *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [759:71213] -A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m tcp --dport 25 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p udp -m state --state NEW -m udp --dport 500 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p udp -m state --state NEW -m udp --dport 4500 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -m policy --dir in --pol ipsec -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p esp -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited -A FORWARD -s 10.31.14.0/24 -d 172.16.53.0/24 -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -m policy --dir in --pol ipsec -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited COMMIT Am I missing a rule in IPTables? Is there something I forgot? NOTE: All the machines are running CentOS 6.x Edit: Note 2: eth1 is the only network interface on the local ipsec box.

  Read the article

• Oops, no RSA or DSA server certificate found for 'server.host.name:0'?

  - by Scott Warren

  I'm setting up a new web server that hosts a dozen virtual hosts on Ubuntu 12.4 using Apache 2.2.22 with one config file per site. I created all the configuration files all at once and ran a2ensite * to enable them all at once. When I reloaded the configuration it failed and after restarting apache I found the following error message in my error.log: Oops, no RSA or DSA server certificate found for 'server.host.name:0'?! Most of the results for this error message are years old that don't fix the problem or are bugs that have been fixed https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31709

  Read the article

• setup L2TP on Ubuntu 10.10

  - by luca

  I'm following this guide to setup a VPS on my Ubuntu VPS: http://riobard.com/blog/2010-04-30-l2tp-over-ipsec-ubuntu/ My config files are setup as in that guide, openswan version is 2.6.26 I think.. It doesn't work, I can show you my auth.log (on the VPS): Feb 18 06:11:07 maverick pluto[6909]: packet from 93.36.127.12:500: received Vendor ID payload [RFC 3947] method set to=109 Feb 18 06:11:07 maverick pluto[6909]: packet from 93.36.127.12:500: received Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike] method set to=110 Feb 18 06:11:07 maverick pluto[6909]: packet from 93.36.127.12:500: ignoring unknown Vendor ID payload [8f8d83826d246b6fc7a8a6a428c11de8] Feb 18 06:11:07 maverick pluto[6909]: packet from 93.36.127.12:500: ignoring unknown Vendor ID payload [439b59f8ba676c4c7737ae22eab8f582] Feb 18 06:11:07 maverick pluto[6909]: packet from 93.36.127.12:500: ignoring unknown Vendor ID payload [4d1e0e136deafa34c4f3ea9f02ec7285] Feb 18 06:11:07 maverick pluto[6909]: packet from 93.36.127.12:500: ignoring unknown Vendor ID payload [80d0bb3def54565ee84645d4c85ce3ee] Feb 18 06:11:07 maverick pluto[6909]: packet from 93.36.127.12:500: ignoring unknown Vendor ID payload [9909b64eed937c6573de52ace952fa6b] Feb 18 06:11:07 maverick pluto[6909]: packet from 93.36.127.12:500: received Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-03] meth=108, but already using method 110 Feb 18 06:11:07 maverick pluto[6909]: packet from 93.36.127.12:500: received Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02] meth=107, but already using method 110 Feb 18 06:11:07 maverick pluto[6909]: packet from 93.36.127.12:500: received Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n] meth=106, but already using method 110 Feb 18 06:11:07 maverick pluto[6909]: packet from 93.36.127.12:500: received Vendor ID payload [Dead Peer Detection] Feb 18 06:11:07 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[7] 93.36.127.12 #7: responding to Main Mode from unknown peer 93.36.127.12 Feb 18 06:11:07 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[7] 93.36.127.12 #7: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R0 to state STATE_MAIN_R1 Feb 18 06:11:07 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[7] 93.36.127.12 #7: STATE_MAIN_R1: sent MR1, expecting MI2 Feb 18 06:11:07 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[7] 93.36.127.12 #7: NAT-Traversal: Result using draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike (MacOS X): peer is NATed Feb 18 06:11:07 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[7] 93.36.127.12 #7: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R1 to state STATE_MAIN_R2 Feb 18 06:11:07 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[7] 93.36.127.12 #7: STATE_MAIN_R2: sent MR2, expecting MI3 Feb 18 06:11:07 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[7] 93.36.127.12 #7: Main mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '10.0.1.8' Feb 18 06:11:07 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[7] 93.36.127.12 #7: switched from "L2TP-PSK-NAT" to "L2TP-PSK-NAT" Feb 18 06:11:07 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[8] 93.36.127.12 #7: deleting connection "L2TP-PSK-NAT" instance with peer 93.36.127.12 {isakmp=#0/ipsec=#0} Feb 18 06:11:07 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[8] 93.36.127.12 #7: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R2 to state STATE_MAIN_R3 Feb 18 06:11:07 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[8] 93.36.127.12 #7: new NAT mapping for #7, was 93.36.127.12:500, now 93.36.127.12:36810 Feb 18 06:11:07 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[8] 93.36.127.12 #7: STATE_MAIN_R3: sent MR3, ISAKMP SA established {auth=OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY cipher=oakley_3des_cbc_192 prf=oakley_sha group=modp1024} Feb 18 06:11:07 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[8] 93.36.127.12 #7: ignoring informational payload, type IPSEC_INITIAL_CONTACT msgid=00000000 Feb 18 06:11:07 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[8] 93.36.127.12 #7: received and ignored informational message Feb 18 06:11:08 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[8] 93.36.127.12 #7: the peer proposed: 69.147.233.173/32:17/1701 -> 10.0.1.8/32:17/0 Feb 18 06:11:08 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[8] 93.36.127.12 #8: responding to Quick Mode proposal {msgid:183463cf} Feb 18 06:11:08 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[8] 93.36.127.12 #8: us: 69.147.233.173<69.147.233.173>[+S=C]:17/1701 Feb 18 06:11:08 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[8] 93.36.127.12 #8: them: 93.36.127.12[10.0.1.8,+S=C]:17/64111===10.0.1.8/32 Feb 18 06:11:08 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[8] 93.36.127.12 #8: transition from state STATE_QUICK_R0 to state STATE_QUICK_R1 Feb 18 06:11:08 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[8] 93.36.127.12 #8: STATE_QUICK_R1: sent QR1, inbound IPsec SA installed, expecting QI2 Feb 18 06:11:08 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[8] 93.36.127.12 #8: transition from state STATE_QUICK_R1 to state STATE_QUICK_R2 Feb 18 06:11:08 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[8] 93.36.127.12 #8: STATE_QUICK_R2: IPsec SA established transport mode {ESP=>0x0b1cf725 <0x0b719671 xfrm=AES_128-HMAC_SHA1 NATOA=none NATD=93.36.127.12:36810 DPD=none} Feb 18 06:11:28 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[8] 93.36.127.12 #7: received Delete SA(0x0b1cf725) payload: deleting IPSEC State #8 Feb 18 06:11:28 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[8] 93.36.127.12 #7: netlink recvfrom() of response to our XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY message for policy eroute_connection delete was too long: 100 > 36 Feb 18 06:11:28 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[8] 93.36.127.12 #7: netlink recvfrom() of response to our XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY message for policy [email protected] was too long: 168 > 36 Feb 18 06:11:28 maverick pluto[6909]: | raw_eroute result=0 Feb 18 06:11:28 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[8] 93.36.127.12 #7: received and ignored informational message Feb 18 06:11:28 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[8] 93.36.127.12 #7: received Delete SA payload: deleting ISAKMP State #7 Feb 18 06:11:28 maverick pluto[6909]: "L2TP-PSK-NAT"[8] 93.36.127.12: deleting connection "L2TP-PSK-NAT" instance with peer 93.36.127.12 {isakmp=#0/ipsec=#0} Feb 18 06:11:28 maverick pluto[6909]: packet from 93.36.127.12:36810: received and ignored informational message and my system log on OSX (from where I'm connecting): Feb 18 13:11:09 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro pppd[68656]: pppd 2.4.2 (Apple version 412.3) started by luca, uid 501 Feb 18 13:11:09 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro pppd[68656]: L2TP connecting to server '69.147.233.173' (69.147.233.173)... Feb 18 13:11:09 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro pppd[68656]: IPSec connection started Feb 18 13:11:09 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro racoon[68453]: Connecting. Feb 18 13:11:09 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro racoon[68453]: IKE Packet: transmit success. (Initiator, Main-Mode message 1). Feb 18 13:11:09 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro racoon[68453]: IKE Packet: receive success. (Initiator, Main-Mode message 2). Feb 18 13:11:09 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro racoon[68453]: IKE Packet: transmit success. (Initiator, Main-Mode message 3). Feb 18 13:11:09 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro racoon[68453]: IKE Packet: receive success. (Initiator, Main-Mode message 4). Feb 18 13:11:09 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro racoon[68453]: IKE Packet: transmit success. (Initiator, Main-Mode message 5). Feb 18 13:11:09 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro racoon[68453]: IKEv1 Phase1 AUTH: success. (Initiator, Main-Mode Message 6). Feb 18 13:11:09 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro racoon[68453]: IKE Packet: receive success. (Initiator, Main-Mode message 6). Feb 18 13:11:09 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro racoon[68453]: IKEv1 Phase1 Initiator: success. (Initiator, Main-Mode). Feb 18 13:11:09 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro racoon[68453]: IKE Packet: transmit success. (Information message). Feb 18 13:11:09 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro racoon[68453]: IKEv1 Information-Notice: transmit success. (ISAKMP-SA). Feb 18 13:11:10 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro racoon[68453]: IKE Packet: transmit success. (Initiator, Quick-Mode message 1). Feb 18 13:11:10 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro racoon[68453]: IKE Packet: receive success. (Initiator, Quick-Mode message 2). Feb 18 13:11:10 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro racoon[68453]: IKE Packet: transmit success. (Initiator, Quick-Mode message 3). Feb 18 13:11:10 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro racoon[68453]: IKEv1 Phase2 Initiator: success. (Initiator, Quick-Mode). Feb 18 13:11:10 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro racoon[68453]: Connected. Feb 18 13:11:10 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro pppd[68656]: IPSec connection established Feb 18 13:11:30 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro pppd[68656]: L2TP cannot connect to the server Feb 18 13:11:30 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro configd[20]: SCNCController: Disconnecting. (Connection tried to negotiate for, 22 seconds). Feb 18 13:11:30 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro racoon[68453]: IKE Packet: transmit success. (Information message). Feb 18 13:11:30 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro racoon[68453]: IKEv1 Information-Notice: transmit success. (Delete IPSEC-SA). Feb 18 13:11:30 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro racoon[68453]: IKE Packet: transmit success. (Information message). Feb 18 13:11:30 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro racoon[68453]: IKEv1 Information-Notice: transmit success. (Delete ISAKMP-SA). Feb 18 13:11:31 luca-ciorias-MacBook-Pro racoon[68453]: Disconnecting. (Connection was up for, 20.157953 seconds).

  Read the article

• OpenSwan IPSec phase #2 complications

  - by XXL

  Phase #1 (IKE) succeeds without any problems (verified at the target host). Phase #2 (IPSec), however, is erroneous at some point (apparently due to misconfiguration on localhost). This should be an IPSec-only connection. I am using OpenSwan on Debian. The error log reads the following (the actual IP-addr. of the remote endpoint has been modified): pluto[30868]: "x" #2: initiating Quick Mode PSK+ENCRYPT+PFS+UP+IKEv2ALLOW+SAREFTRACK {using isakmp#1 msgid:5ece82ee proposal=AES(12)_256-SHA1(2)_160 pfsgroup=OAKLEY_GROUP_DH22} pluto[30868]: "x" #1: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN msgid=00000000 pluto[30868]: "x" #1: received and ignored informational message pluto[30868]: "x" #1: the peer proposed: 0.0.0.0/0:0/0 - 0.0.0.0/0:0/0 pluto[30868]: "x" #3: responding to Quick Mode proposal {msgid:a4f5a81c} pluto[30868]: "x" #3: us: 192.168.1.76<192.168.1.76[+S=C] pluto[30868]: "x" #3: them: 222.222.222.222<222.222.222.222[+S=C]===10.196.0.0/17 pluto[30868]: "x" #3: transition from state STATE_QUICK_R0 to state STATE_QUICK_R1 pluto[30868]: "x" #3: STATE_QUICK_R1: sent QR1, inbound IPsec SA installed, expecting QI2 pluto[30868]: "x" #1: ignoring informational payload, type NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN msgid=00000000 pluto[30868]: "x" #1: received and ignored informational message pluto[30868]: "x" #3: next payload type of ISAKMP Hash Payload has an unknown value: 97 X pluto[30868]: "x" #3: malformed payload in packet pluto[30868]: | payload malformed after IV I am behind NAT and this is all coming from wlan2. Here are the details: default via 192.168.1.254 dev wlan2 proto static 169.254.0.0/16 dev wlan2 scope link metric 1000 192.168.1.0/24 dev wlan2 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.1.76 metric 2 Output of ipsec verify: Checking your system to see if IPsec got installed and started correctly: Version check and ipsec on-path [OK] Linux Openswan U2.6.37/K3.2.0-24-generic (netkey) Checking for IPsec support in kernel [OK] SAref kernel support [N/A] NETKEY: Testing XFRM related proc values [OK] [OK] [OK] Checking that pluto is running [OK] Pluto listening for IKE on udp 500 [OK] Pluto listening for NAT-T on udp 4500 [OK] Two or more interfaces found, checking IP forwarding [OK] Checking NAT and MASQUERADEing [OK] Checking for 'ip' command [OK] Checking /bin/sh is not /bin/dash [WARNING] Checking for 'iptables' command [OK] Opportunistic Encryption Support [DISABLED] This is what happens when I run ipsec auto --up x: 104 "x" #1: STATE_MAIN_I1: initiate 003 "x" #1: received Vendor ID payload [RFC 3947] method set to=109 106 "x" #1: STATE_MAIN_I2: sent MI2, expecting MR2 003 "x" #1: received Vendor ID payload [Cisco-Unity] 003 "x" #1: received Vendor ID payload [Dead Peer Detection] 003 "x" #1: ignoring unknown Vendor ID payload [502099ff84bd4373039074cf56649aad] 003 "x" #1: received Vendor ID payload [XAUTH] 003 "x" #1: NAT-Traversal: Result using RFC 3947 (NAT-Traversal): i am NATed 108 "x" #1: STATE_MAIN_I3: sent MI3, expecting MR3 004 "x" #1: STATE_MAIN_I4: ISAKMP SA established {auth=OAKLEY_PRESHARED_KEY cipher=aes_128 prf=oakley_sha group=modp1024} 117 "x" #2: STATE_QUICK_I1: initiate 010 "x" #2: STATE_QUICK_I1: retransmission; will wait 20s for response 010 "x" #2: STATE_QUICK_I1: retransmission; will wait 40s for response 031 "x" #2: max number of retransmissions (2) reached STATE_QUICK_I1. No acceptable response to our first Quick Mode message: perhaps peer likes no proposal 000 "x" #2: starting keying attempt 2 of at most 3, but releasing whack I have enabled NAT traversal in ipsec.conf accordingly. Here are the settings relative to the connection in question: version 2.0 config setup plutoopts="--perpeerlog" plutoopts="--interface=wlan2" dumpdir=/var/run/pluto/ nat_traversal=yes virtual_private=%v4:10.0.0.0/8,%v4:192.168.0.0/16,%v4:172.16.0.0/12 oe=off protostack=netkey conn x authby=secret pfs=yes auto=add phase2alg=aes256-sha1;dh22 keyingtries=3 ikelifetime=8h type=transport left=192.168.1.76 leftsubnet=192.168.1.0/24 leftprotoport=0/0 right=222.222.222.222 rightsubnet=10.196.0.0/17 rightprotoport=0/0 Here are the specs provided by the other end that must be met for Phase #2: encryption algorithm: AES (128 or 256 bit) hash algorithm: SHA local ident1 (addr/mask/prot/port): (10.196.0.0/255.255.128.0/0/0) local ident2 (addr/mask/prot/port): (10.241.0.0/255.255.0.0/0/0) remote ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (x.x.x.x/x.x.x.x/0/0) (internal network or localhost) Security association lifetime: 4608000 kilobytes/3600 seconds PFS: DH group2 So, finally, what might be the cause of the issue that I am experiencing? Thank you.

  Read the article

• Check if root ca certificate is installed

  - by Zulakis

  We are having a custom CA for our local-domains. The Root CA certificate is installed on all the corporate machines by default, but sometimes it happens that we have someone here who doesn't have it installed. If the user a) accesses our intranet using http or b) accepts the server-certificate I would like to redirect the user to a site which tells it what happened and how they can install the root CA. The only solution I found was the following: <img src="https://the_site/the_image" onerror="redirectToCertPage()"> This is barely a work-around and not really a solution. It can be triggered by other problems then the missing certificate. Are there any better solutions on how to solve this problem?

  Read the article

• OpenVPN and TomatoVPN

  - by Bill Johnson

  Wondering if someone can help me with the following. I have updated my Linksys router with TomatoVPN and used the following config: Interface Type:TAP Protocol:UDP Port:1195 Firewall Custom Authorization Mode:Static Key I have then inserted the static key generated in OpenVPN saved and started the service. connect.ovpn. # Use the following to have your client computer send all traffic through your router # (remote gateway) remote (entered my DNS/DHCP servers external IP address here) port 1195 dev tap secret static.key.txt proto udp comp-lzo route-gateway 192.168.1.1 redirect-gateway float I've then placed my static key in a file in the same directory as your connect.ovpn (static.key.txt) Now OpenVPN is installed on a laptop that I use at home. I have plugged in the laptop to my home connection and started connect.ovpn The Local Area Connection is connected as 'Home Network 3' - and when I start OpenVPN it is connected as 'Local Area Connection 2' and this is showing as 'Unidentified Network' and it appears there is no network access. TAP-Win32 Adapter V9 appears to be the adaptors name and the IP and DNS properties are set to automatic. If I open up the OpenVPN GUI it shows an error message saying "Connecting to connect has failed". Looking at the error message behind this pop-up one line says "TCP/UDP Socket bind failed on local address [undef]:1195 Address already in use [WSAEADDRINUSE] Could anyone possibly help me further with this please?

  Read the article

• best practice to removing DC from Site that no longer connects via vpn in another city

  - by dasko

  hi i am looking for a recap of what i have done already to see if i missed anything. i had two cities connected by wan using a ipsec persistent tunnel between gateways. i had one DC (DOMAIN CONTROLLER) in each city that was a global catalog server (GC) they were set up to replicate and i had them configured under Sites and Servers with their own subnet etc... about 6 months ago the one city was removed and i was not able to gracefully remove, through dcpromo, the server that was there. it is no longer used and cannot be brought back. the company went from two sites down to single site. Problem is i had a whole bunch of kcc errors and replication bugs in the event viewer. i wanted to clean up my active directory and decided to use the ntdsutil metadata cleanup commands. i removed the server from the specifed site based on a procedure from petri website. I then removed the instances of the old DC and site from Sites and Servers. Then i went and cleaned up the DNS by removing Host A records, NS server name from both the local DNS forward lookup zone and the _msdcs i also removed the reverse lookup zone for the subnet that no longer exists. is there anything i missed? thanks in advance for any help. gd

  Read the article

• Import a bunch of certificates into the correct certificate store using a script

  - by Jesse Weigert

  I have a collection of certificates in a p7b file, and I would like to automatically import each certificate into the correct store depending on the certificate template. What is the best way to do this with a script? I tried using certutil -addstore root Certificate.p7b, and that will correctly place all of the root CAs into the root store, but it returns an error if it encounters any other type of certificate. I'm willing to use batch scripts, vbscript or powershell to accomplish this task. Thanks!

  Read the article

• Amazon EC2 - HTTPS - Certificate body is invalid. The body must not contain a private key

  - by Tam Minh

  I'm very new to Amazon EC2. I am trying to setup https for my website, I follow the offical instruction from amazon doc: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/elasticbeanstalk/latest/dg/configuring-https.html When I Upload a Signed Certificate using AWS command aws iam upload-server-certificate --server-certificate-name dichcumga --certificate-body file://mycert.pem --private-key file://signedkey.pem --certificate-chain file://mychain.pem And I got error A client error (MalformedCertificate) occurred when calling the UploadServerCert ificate operation: Certificate body is invalid. The body must not contain a private key. mycert.pem is a combination of private.pem and signedkey.pem (which return by VeriSign) copy private.pem+signedkey.pem mycert.pem Please help to shed a light. Thank you in advance.

  Read the article

• How to check a digital certificate?

  - by StackedCrooked

  I have extracted a certificate from a cable modem. Now I want to verify if this certificate is valid. If I understand correctly, the verification process consists of having the issuer sign the subject's public key and then comparing the result with the subject's signature. This signing process is done using the issuer's private key, which nobody but the issuer has access to. So even if I have both certificates on my PC, there is no way for me to verify the subject's validity. From this I can only conclude that the verification must be implemented as a remote service. The problem is that I don't know what remote service I need to access to verify this certificate. The issuer is "AVM GmbH Cable Modem Root Certificate Authority". How can I find the webservice for verification? Is there standard lookup mechanism for this?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112  | Next Page >