Search Results

Search found 6281 results on 252 pages for 'automated tests'.

Page 108/252 | < Previous Page | 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115  | Next Page >

• PrestaShop install SQL error

  - by Steve

  I am trying to install PrestaShop 1.4.0.17, and reach Step 3. I enter database information, which tests okay, and I choose the second option: Full mode: includes 100+ additional modules and demo products (FREE too!). I choose Next, and receive the error: Error while inserting data in the database: ‘CREATE TABLE `shop_county_zip_code` ( `id_county` INT NOT NULL , `from_zip_code` INT NOT NULL , `to_zip_code` INT NOT NULL , PRIMARY KEY ( `id_county` , `from_zip_code` , `to_zip_code` ) ) ENGINE=’ You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near \’\’ at line 6(Error: : 1064) This happens if I use either MyISAM, or InnoDB. Why is this happening? This also happens if I drop all database tables, and try again in simple mode. Is there a manual installation method?

  Read the article

• Test Driven Development Code Order

  - by Bobby Kostadinov

  I am developing my first project using test driven development. I am using Zend Framework and PHPUnit. Currently my project is at 100% code coverage but I am not sure I understand in what order I am supposed to write my code. Am I supposed to write my test FIRST with what my objects are expected to do or write my objects and then test them? Ive been working on completing a controller/model and then writing at test for it but I am not sure this is what TDD is about? Any advice? For example, I wrote my Auth plugin and my Auth controller and tested that they work properly in my browser, and then I sat down to write the tests for them, which proved that there were some logical errors in the code that did work in the browser.

  Read the article

• Spezialisierung ohne Grenzen

  - by A&C Redaktion

  Arrow erreicht Exadata Spezialisierung für alle EMEA-Länder “Know-how sells” – das weiß auch unser VAD Arrow. Der IT-Distributor aus Fürstenfeldbruck, nahe München, hat sich auf die Bereitstellung von Enterprise und Midrange Computing Lösungen fokussiert. So auch für die Exadata Technologie von Oracle. Exadata beinhaltet Server, Speicher, Netzwerktechnik und Datenbanksoftware in einem System und hilft so, auch große Datenmengen – die „Big Data“ – spielend zu managen. Die Kombination aus Hard- und Software bietet Oracle Partnern enorme Geschäftspotenziale im Verkauf und im Service, deshalb ist eine Expertise so wichtig. Durch die vier europäischen Demo-Zentren und insgesamt acht komplett installierte Exadata reichlich Erfahrung mit der Oracle Exa-Familie sammeln können. Der VAD bietet Oracle Partnern und Kunden Performance-Tests, Testumgebungen und Proof of Concepts (PoC) an – und das länderübergreifend. Als logische Konsequenz wurde Arrow im August 2012 mit der EMEA Spezialisierung für Exadata von Oracle ausgezeichnet! Wir gratulieren ganz herzlich und wünschen viel Erfolg mit dem Exa-Stack!

  Read the article

• Spezialisierung ohne Grenzen

  - by A&C Redaktion

  Arrow erreicht Exadata Spezialisierung für alle EMEA-Länder “Know-how sells” – das weiß auch unser VAD Arrow. Der IT-Distributor aus Fürstenfeldbruck, nahe München, hat sich auf die Bereitstellung von Enterprise und Midrange Computing Lösungen fokussiert. So auch für die Exadata Technologie von Oracle. Exadata beinhaltet Server, Speicher, Netzwerktechnik und Datenbanksoftware in einem System und hilft so, auch große Datenmengen – die „Big Data“ – spielend zu managen. Die Kombination aus Hard- und Software bietet Oracle Partnern enorme Geschäftspotenziale im Verkauf und im Service, deshalb ist eine Expertise so wichtig. Durch die vier europäischen Demo-Zentren und insgesamt acht komplett installierte Exadata reichlich Erfahrung mit der Oracle Exa-Familie sammeln können. Der VAD bietet Oracle Partnern und Kunden Performance-Tests, Testumgebungen und Proof of Concepts (PoC) an – und das länderübergreifend. Als logische Konsequenz wurde Arrow im August 2012 mit der EMEA Spezialisierung für Exadata von Oracle ausgezeichnet! Wir gratulieren ganz herzlich und wünschen viel Erfolg mit dem Exa-Stack!

  Read the article

• 3D RTS pathfinding

  - by xcrypt

  I understand the A* algorithm, but I have some trouble doing it in 3D to suit the needs of my RTS Basically, in the game I'm making, there will be agents with different sizes of OBB collision boxes. I can use steering behaviours for avoiding other agents, so I don't need complete dynamic pathfinding. However, there is a problem because different agents have different collision geometry, and structures can be placed in almost any place. This means that there might be a gap between two structures where some agents can go through and some can't. A solution I have found to this problem is to do a sweep of the collision geometry of the agent from start node of the edge the pf algorithm is currently testing, to the end node of that edge. But this is probably a bit overkill since every edge the algorithm tests would also have to create and test with a collision geometry sweep. What are some reasonable approaches to this problem? I should mention that I'd prefer not to use navmeshes, I prefer waypoints because my entire system is based on it atm.

  Read the article

• Selenium-Nunit Program Structure

  - by Jacobm001

  My office has a suite of web reporting engines written in VB. All in all there's about 300 reports with varying displays depending on the data being input into them. I'm trying to establish an efficient way to deal with such a major diversity, but am struggling with creating a system that won't be a nightmare to code/maintain. What I've considered doing is: On program launch, read the steps required for each test page. This may have multiple tests for the same page with varying inputs. Write each iteration of the test in XML file under $env:temp/testname Use the TestCaseSource attribute of Nunit to funnel every related xml file as a source. My major stumbling block has been how to get that data to the Nunit framework. Is Nunit really appropriate for what I'm trying to do, or is it too static?

  Read the article

• How to Clean Your Dirty Smartphone (Without Breaking Something)

  - by Justin Garrison

  We have already shown you how to clean your keyboard without breaking it, but did you know your smartphone can be just as dirty and covered with bacteria? Here is how to properly clean your smartphone. Cell Phones have been repeatedly found to be one of the most disgusting things we regularly touch. In many tests, cell phones have tested to contain more germs than a toilet seat. Can you hear me now? You don’t want to put your head on a toilet seat. If you are going to reach out and touch someone your phone, make sure you rethink possibilities and clean your smartphone the right way. Created by OatmealHTG Explains: Photography with Film-Based CamerasHow to Clean Your Dirty Smartphone (Without Breaking Something)What is a Histogram, and How Can I Use it to Improve My Photos?

  Read the article

• Free Pluralsight Videos for this week

  - by TATWORTH

  Pluralsight have issued two free videoshttp://blog.pluralsight.com/2012/09/05/video-end-the-global-pollution-crisis-in-javascript/http://blog.pluralsight.com/2012/08/31/video-fake-it-until-you-make-it-with-fakeiteasy/Their exact words were: Free Videos this Week End the Global Pollution Crisis... In Javascript Too many globally scoped variables and functions can make Javascript code difficult to work with, particularly on large projects. See how to simulate the concept of namespaces using objects. Fake it Until You Make It with FakeItEasy FakeItEasy is a .NET framework for easily creating mock objects in tests. See how easy it is to FakeItEasy with complex nested hierarchies.

  Read the article

• How to conduct A/B split testing with AdSense?

  - by None

  Ok so I have decided to A/B test my AdSense ads. I have run a few tests, but I don't know what conclusion to draw and how to keep track of things. Some specific questions: If I have 2 test units, 1 wins. I test that with a new and so on. How do I find if say the fifth one did better than the first one? How do I keep track of things? Do I let the variables independent of each other, because they certainly are not. In real life, font size can affect CTR even if the colors are different. I can test blue color with red color, and then test Arial font with Georgia, but how do I know which combination is the best? This would result in way too many test units. I tried Googling a lot, but I could not find answers to these questions.

  Read the article

• CommonFilter 0.3D now released on CodePlex.

  CommonFilter is a subset of the CommonData project, containing just the functions and unit tests for filtering user input. The functions include filters for: Input of upper case and lower case alpha Input of numeric fields Input of text containing HTML markup to check that it only contains permitted markup. The general functions are available both as a form that silently drops non-permitted characters or in a try-parse format....Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

  Read the article

• What is the aim of software testing?

  - by user970696

  Having read many books, there is a basic contradiction: Some say, "the goal of testing is to find bugs" while other say "the goal of the testing is to equalize the quality of the product", meaning that bugs are its by-products. I would also agree that if testing would be aimed primarily on a bug hunt, who would do the actual verification and actually provided the information, that the software is ready? Even e.g. Kaner changed his original definiton of testing goal from bug hunting to quality assesement provision but I still cannot see the clear difference. I percieve both as equally important. I can verify software by its specification to make sure it works and in that case, bugs found are just by products. But also I perform tests just to brake things. Also what definition is more accurate?

  Read the article

• CommonFilter 0.3D now released on CodePlex.

  CommonFilter is a subset of the CommonData project, containing just the functions and unit tests for filtering user input. The functions include filters for: Input of upper case and lower case alpha Input of numeric fields Input of text containing HTML markup to check that it only contains permitted markup. The general functions are available both as a form that silently drops non-permitted characters or in a try-parse format....Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

  Read the article

• Can you recommend a good test plan template?

  - by Ethel Evans

  Can you recommend a good test plan template for an agile testing team? I know there are templates for testing on the web and have already looked at some found by search engines, but I could really use something lightweight and something that has already been tried by skilled testers and is known to work well. Many templates I've seen give me the feeling that writing test documents is expected to be a third of the work that those testers are doing, but my team really prefers to use less documentation and more actual test writing. We use a wiki for documentation, so an approach that lends itself to living documents would be great. My hope is that using a more structured approach to test planning will increase the usefulness of my test plan while reducing the effort to create it by allowing me to think about the tests, and not the format and structure of the plan. My workplace does not have something already on hand, so whatever I start doing might be adopted by the company.

  Read the article

• I'm looking for websites with programming problems that I can practice [on hold]

  - by Spentak

  I want to become a more skilled programmer. I also want to do it through Objective-C and iOS. What websites or programs that you know of have problems that I can solve (with the answers)? I have failed some programming tests for jobs (such as "Given 2 values in a Binary Tree - how do you find the lowest common ancestor?) and I want to become a better engineer. I have developed 54 iOS/Android apps to date, but my core CS Skills apparently are rusty/bad. I have looked at TopCoder - but there aren't very many competitions going on, the website is terrible, and there does not appear to be anything that really supports Objective-C/iOS Websites?

  Read the article

• Distributing a very simple application

  - by vanna

  I have a very simple working console application written in C++ linked with a light static library. It is just for testing purposes. Now that the coding part is done, I would like to know the process of actually distributing the program. I wrote a very basic CMakeLists.txt that create makefiles or VS projects to build the sources. I also have a program that calls the static library in order to make some google tests. To me, the distribution of this application goes like this : to developpers : the src directory with the CMakeLists.txt file (multi-platform distribution) with a README.txt and an INSTALL.txt to users : the executable and a README.txt on my git repo : everything mentionned above plus the sources for testing and the gtest external lib A this point : considering the complexity of my application, am I doing it right ? Is there any reference that would formalize this distribution process so I can get better and go further ? Say I would like to add dynamic libraries that can be updated, external libraries like boost : how should I package this to distribute it in a professionnal way ?

  Read the article

• If you should only have one assertion per test; how to test multiple inputs?

  - by speg

  I'm trying to build up some test cases, and have read that you should try and limit the number of assertions per test case. So my question is, what is the best way to go about testing a function w/ multiple inputs. For example, I have a function that parses a string from the user and returns the number of minutes. The string can be in the form "5w6h2d1m", where w, h, d, m correspond to the number of weeks, hours, days, and minutes. If I wanted to follow the '1 assertion per test rule' I'd have to make multiple tests for each variation of input? That seems silly so instead I just have something like: self.assertEqual(parse_date('5m'), 5) self.assertEqual(parse_date('5h'), 300) self.assertEqual(parse_date('5d') ,7200) self.assertEqual(parse_date('1d4h20m'), 1700) In the one test case. Is there a better way?

  Read the article

• La bêta du navigateur open-source RockMelt est disponible pour tous, il s'axe vers le social et est basé sur Chromium

  La bêta du navigateur open-source RockMelt est disponible pour tous, il s'axe vers le social et est basé sur Chromium Mise à jour du 10.03.2011 par Katleen RockMelt avait lancé la version bêta de son navigateur en novembre dernier, mais il fallait posséder une invitation pour pouvoir la télécharger. Aujourd'hui, la situation est différente, et tout le monde peut désormais la télécharger. Car, après près de 5 mois de tests par quelques centaines de milliers d'utilisateurs bêta, et 15 mises à jours, ses développeurs estiment qu'elle est prête à s'ouvrir au public. Pour rappel, RockMelt est un navigateur open-source basé sur Chromium qui privilégie les flux sociaux, en intégrant d'office...

  Read the article

• Azure price through Unit Testing

  - by mrtentje

  For I project I am trying to find a way to measure an estimation of the costs of an Azure application through Unit Testing. Likely I will extend the Visual Studio Unit Testing framework (or another solution is also possible as long as it can run together (same time/side by side, when the Visual Studio Framework will run some tests the Azure solution must also run (if it is an Azure project)) with the Visual Studio Testing framework. A (Visual Studio) extension will be build to reuse it for future projects. Does anyone has any experience or any ideas how this can be achieved? Thanks in advance

  Read the article

• What set of tools make up "the rails way" of testing javascript in the browser?

  - by Jordan Feldstein

  What's the concensus for doing in-browser (either headless or remote-controlled) testing of javascript? Unit testing my JS is nice, but can't protect against irresponsible changes to the DOM. Unit testing of the JS and functional testing of the views to make sure they both provide and utilize the same, correct DOM, might work, but then the link between JS and DOM is being covered in two places which seems brittle or cumbersome. Is there an acknowledged "Rails Way" to implement full-stack tests, where I can run my javascript against the DOM rendered by the rest of the app, and check the results? (Something like what PHPUnit and Selenium give us, but inside the rails framework?)

  Read the article

• Tracking 502 bad gateway error

  - by dasickle

  I moved my Wordpress site to WP Engine and now I constantly get 502 errors. I spoke with support and they said that its because I have a lot of DB queries. I ran some tests and my frontpage only has 95 queries and page size is about 500kb. Most inner pages are around 60 queries. All queries are very short. Some people tell me its common with WP Engine because they run nginx. Why do I keep getting these errors and is there a way to track how many of them happen on daily basis? P.S. WP Engine log is empty so cant see the 502's there.

  Read the article

• How to layer if statements when order of logic is irrelevant?

  - by jimmyjimmy

  Basically I have a series of logic in my website that can lead to 5 total outcomes. Basically two different if tests and then a catch all else statement. For example: if cond1: if mod1: #do things elif mod2: #do things elif cond2: if mod1: #do things elif mod2 #do things else: #do things I was thinking about rewriting it like this: if cond1 and mod1: #do things elif cond1 and mod2: #do things elif cond2 and mod1: #do things elif cond2 and mod2: #do things else: #do things Is there any real difference in these two coding options/a better choice for this kind of logic testing?

  Read the article

• Introduce unit testing when codebase is already available

  - by McMannus

  I've been working on a project in Flex for three years now without unit testing. The simple reason for that is the fact that I just didn't realize the importance of unit testing when being at the beginning of studies at university. Now my attitude towards testing changed completely and therefore I want to introduce it to the existing project (about 25000LOC). In order to do it, there are two approaches to choose from: 1) Discard the existing codebase and start from scratch with TDD 2) Write the tests and try to make them pass by changing the existing code Well, I would appreciate not having to write everything from scratch but I think by doing this, the design would be much better. What would you advise me to do? Thanks for replies in advance! Jan

  Read the article

• Les développeurs au centre de Chrome 24, le navigateur disponible en bêta avec un gain en rapidité du moteur JavaScript

  Les développeurs au centre de Chrome 24 le navigateur disponible en bêta avec un gain en rapidité du moteur JavaScript La sortie d'une nouvelle version de Chrome marque l'entrée dans le canal bêta de son successeur. À peine avoir eu accès à la version stable de Chrome 23, les développeurs et les early adopters peuvent déjà tester les nouvelles fonctionnalités de Chrome 24 qui est disponible en version bêta. Améliorations de performances et nouvelles fonctionnalités pour les développeurs sont les points sur lesquels Google s'est concentré pour cette mouture. L'éditeur vante le gain en rapidité du navigateur. Du moins, en ce qui concerne JavaScript. Les tests sur son...

  Read the article

• xUnit global setup / teardown [migrated]

  - by Codism

  I need to run some code before any test is executed and also some code after all tests are done. I thought there must be some attributes or marker interface to indicate the global initialization and termination code but couldn't find them. Alternatively, if I can invoke xUnit programmatically, I can also achieve what I want to do by the following code: ... Main(string[] args) { try { MyGlobalSetup(); RunAllTests(); // What goes into this method? } finally { MyGlobalTeardown(); } } Can anyone provide me some hint about how to declaratively or programmally run some global setup/teardown code? Thanks

  Read the article

• What Design Pattern is seperating transform converters

  - by RevMoon

  For converting a Java object model into XML I am using the following design: For different types of objects (e.g. primitive types, collections, null, etc.) I define each its own converter, which acts appropriate with respect to the given type. This way it can easily extended without adding code to a huge if-else-then construct. The converters are chosen by a method which tests whether the object is convertable at all and by using a priority ordering. The priority ordering is important so let's say a List is not converted by the POJO converter, even though it is convertable as such it would be more appropriate to use the collection converter. What design pattern is that? I can only think of a similarity to the command pattern.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115  | Next Page >