Search Results

Search found 337 results on 14 pages for 'cas'.

Page 11/14 | < Previous Page | 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14  | Next Page >

  • Microsoft sponsor de la Fondation Linux ? L'éditeur figure parmi les Sponsors Gold de la conférence LinuxCon Europe

    Microsoft sponsor de la Fondation Linux ? L'éditeur figure parmi les Sponsors Gold de la conférence LinuxCon Europe Microsoft, sponsor de la fondation Linux ou en passe de l'être ? C'est en tout cas ce que laisse présager la liste des sponsors de l'événement LinuxCon Europe 2012 autour de l'écosystème Linux qui s'est déroulé la semaine dernière à Barcelone en Espagne et l'orientation vers l'ouverture de la société. La liste publiée sur le site de l'événement permet de constater que la firme de Redmond figure parmi les sponsors Gold de l'événement au même titre que HP, Red Hat ou encore Samsung. [IMG]http://rdonfack.develop...

    Read the article

  • Sortie de Qt Mobility 1.0.0, 10 nouvelles API pour les plateformes mobiles : envoi de SMS au rendez-

    Après un peu d'attente, voilà enfin la première sortie officielle de Qt Mobility. Cette release contient 10 API dont 9 sont considérées comme finales et 1 comme beta. Les 9 API finales sont les suivantes : Service Framework Bearer Management Messaging Contacts Versit Publish and Subscribe Location System Information Sensors L'API multimédia quant à elle est à un très bon état de développement, mais l'équipe de développement se réserve la possibilité de modifier cette version. Dans ce cas, cette version beta ne sera pas maintenue, il est donc à vos risques et périls de l'utiliser dès à présent. Où les trouver ? Elles sont disponibles sur ...

    Read the article

  • Microsoft brevète la technologie de ses Microsoft Glass, les lunettes prochain objet grand public révolutionné par l'informatique ?

    Microsoft brevète des technologies pour des Microsoft Glass Les lunettes prochain objet grand public révolutionné par l'informatique ? Les Google Glass suscitent beaucoup d'intérêt de la part de la concurrence. Après Apple, c'est au tour de Microsoft de se lancer dans ce genre de projet. L'éditeur qui avait promis qu'il sortirait d'autres appareils que la Surface (et la Xbox 360) sous sa marque propre pourrait bien tenir parole avec des lunettes. C'est en tout cas ce que laisse entrevoir un brevet qu'il a déposé ce 22 novembre. [IMG]http://ftp-developpez.com/gordon-fowler/Microsoft%20Glass.jpg[/IMG] Microsoft Glasses te...

    Read the article

  • Procès Java - Android : Oracle fait appel du premier jugement en faveur de Google

    Android : fin du procès entre Oracle et Google Débouté de presque tout Oracle peut encore faire appel Mise à jour du 18/07/12 Le procès entre Oracle et Google est terminé. En tout cas le premier procès. Après avoir été débouté de quasiment toutes ses demandes, Oracle avait demandé au juge un nouveau procès pour revoir les faits et les premières décisions. Dans un document publié en fin de semaine dernière le juge refuse cette possibilité au motif qu'Oracle n'apporte aucun argument nouveau dans sa demande. Oracle accusait Google d'avoir enfreint plusieurs de ses brevets en utilisant certaines API dans Android. La société de Larry El...

    Read the article

  • Le kernel Linux s'oriente vers une version unique pour puces ARM, Linux 3.7 1ère étape pour mettre fin aux déclinaisons ARM multiples

    Le kernel Linux s'oriente vers une version unique pour puces ARM Linux 3.7 première étape pour mettre fin aux déclinaisons ARM multiples La nouveauté phare pour Linux 3.7, la prochaine mise à jour majeure du noyau sera le support de plusieurs puces ARM au sein d'un seul Kernel. Le support actuel des puces ARM par le Kernel Linux oblige la création des variantes différentes du noyau pour chaque plateforme ARM. En effet, les fabricants des puces ARM prennent en charge des périphériques et pilotes de différentes manières, ne permettant d'offrir une interface de programmation standard sur laquelle pourra s'appuyer le noyau Linux, comme c'est le cas pour les puces x86. ...

    Read the article

  • Microsoft précise l'avenir de ses technologies de développement Web ASP.NET Web Forms, Web API, MVC et applications Facebook

    Microsoft précise l'avenir de ses technologies de développement Web ASP.NET Web Forms, Web API, MVC et applications Facebook Microsoft précise sa vision pour ASP.NET et publie une feuille de route traçant l'avenir de l'ensemble de ses technologies de développement Web. Les plans prévoient notablement de meilleurs templates et des progrès sur les fonctionnalités OData dans ASP.NET Web API. [IMG]http://ww1.prweb.com/prfiles/2012/03/08/9268042/gI_83262_best-aspnet-web-hosting.png[/IMG] Selon le site du projet CodePlex, ces plans ne seraient en fait que des prévisions que les développeurs de Microsoft aspirent d'atteindre. Ce n'est en aucun cas des spécifications à s...

    Read the article

  • Google menace de ne plus indexer la presse française si une taxe sur le référencement est votée : qu'en pensez-vous ?

    Google menace de ne plus indexer la presse française si une taxe sur le référencement venait à être votée Google vient de lancer un ultimatum à la presse française et au gouvernement en menaçant de déréférencer les contenus des éditeurs en cas d'adoption de la taxe Google. L'Association de la presse d'information politique et générale (IPG) et le Syndicat de la presse quotidienne nationale ont adressé en septembre dernier une ébauche d'un projet de loi au gouvernement français, visant à l'instauration d'une taxe Google. Ceux-ci estiment que le géant de la recherche tire profit de leurs contenus et actualités pour enrichir son moteur de recherche, permettant à celui-ci de générer de...

    Read the article

  • Android : 56% des utilisateurs français n'ont pas d'appli payante d'après Surikate, les bugs principale raison de désinstallation des apps

    Android : 56% des utilisateurs français n'ont aucune application payante D'après une étude de Surikate, les bugs sont la principale raison de la désinstallation d'une app La société de marketing mobile Surikate vient de réaliser une nouvelle étude sur les utilisateurs d'Android en France. Menée en partenariat avec l'Ifop, et avec plus de 9 000 participants, cette enquête avance quelques chiffres intéressants ? ou en tout cas surprenant. Deux qui retiendront un peu plus l'attention des développeurs. Le premier révèle que la principale raison de suppression d'une application est la présence de bugs (76%). Le deuxième que 56% des possesseurs d'appareils sous A...

    Read the article

  • Strategies for "Always-Connected" Windows Client Data Architecture

    - by magz2010
    Hi. Let me start by saying: this is my 1st post here, this is a bit lenghty, and I havent done Windows Forms development in years....with that in mind please excuse me if this isn't directly a programming question and please bear with me as I really need the help!! I have been asked to develop a Windows Forms app for our company that talks to a central (local area network) Linux Server hosting a PostgreSQL database. The app is to allow users to authenticate themselves into the system and thereafter conduct the usual transactions with the PG database. Ordinarily, I would propose writing a webforms app against Mono, but the clients need to utilise local resources such as USB peripheral devices, so that is out of the question. While it might not seem clear, my questions are italised below: Dilemma #1: The application is meant to be always connected. How should I structure my DAL/BLL - Should this reside on the server or with the client? Dilemma #2: I have been reading up on Client Application Services (CAS), and it seems like a great fit for authentication, as everything is exposed via URIs. I know that a .NET Data Provider exists for PostgreSQL, but not too sure if CAS will all work on a Linux (Debian) server? Believe me, I would get my hands dirty and try myself, but I need to come up with a logical design first before resources are allocated to me for "trial purposes"! Dilemma #3: If the DAL/BLL is to reside on the server, is there any way I can create data services, and expose only these services to authenticated clients. There is a (security) requirement whereby a connection string with username and password to the database cannot be present on any client machines...even if security on the database side is quite rigid. I'm guessing that the only way for this to work would be to create the various CRUD data service methods that are exposed by an ASP.NET app, and have the WindowsForms make a request for data or persist data to the ASP.NET app (thru a URI) and have that return a resultset or value. Would I be correct in assuming this? Should I be looking into WCF Data Services? and will WCF work with a non-SQL Server database? Thank you for taking the time out to read this, but know that I am desperately seeking any advice on this! THANKS A MILLION!!!!

    Read the article

  • Improving WIF&rsquo;s Claims-based Authorization - Part 2

    - by Your DisplayName here!
    In the last post I showed you how to take control over the invocation of ClaimsAuthorizationManager. Then you have complete freedom over the claim types, the amount of claims and the values. In addition I added two attributes that invoke the authorization manager using an “application claim type”. This way it is very easy to distinguish between authorization calls that originate from WIF’s per-request authorization and the ones from “within” you application. The attribute comes in two flavours: a CAS attribute (invoked by the CLR) and an ASP.NET MVC attribute (for MVC controllers, invoke by the MVC plumbing). Both also feature static methods to easily call them using the application claim types. The CAS attribute is part of Thinktecture.IdentityModel on Codeplex (or via NuGet: Install-Package Thinktecture.IdentityModel). If you really want to see that code ;) There is also a sample included in the Codeplex donwload. The MVC attribute is currently used in Thinktecture.IdentityServer – and I don’t currently plan to make it part of the library project since I don’t want to add a dependency on MVC for now. You can find the code below – and I will write about its usage in a follow-up post. public class ClaimsAuthorize : AuthorizeAttribute {     private string _resource;     private string _action;     private string[] _additionalResources;     /// <summary>     /// Default action claim type.     /// </summary>     public const string ActionType = "http://application/claims/authorization/action";     /// <summary>     /// Default resource claim type     /// </summary>     public const string ResourceType = "http://application/claims/authorization/resource";     /// <summary>     /// Additional resource claim type     /// </summary>     public const string AdditionalResourceType = "http://application/claims/authorization/additionalresource"          public ClaimsAuthorize(string action, string resource, params string[] additionalResources)     {         _action = action;         _resource = resource;         _additionalResources = additionalResources;     }     public static bool CheckAccess(       string action, string resource, params string[] additionalResources)     {         return CheckAccess(             Thread.CurrentPrincipal as IClaimsPrincipal,             action,             resource,             additionalResources);     }     public static bool CheckAccess(       IClaimsPrincipal principal, string action, string resource, params string[] additionalResources)     {         var context = CreateAuthorizationContext(             principal,             action,             resource,             additionalResources);         return ClaimsAuthorization.CheckAccess(context);     }     protected override bool AuthorizeCore(HttpContextBase httpContext)     {         return CheckAccess(_action, _resource, _additionalResources);     }     private static WIF.AuthorizationContext CreateAuthorizationContext(       IClaimsPrincipal principal, string action, string resource, params string[] additionalResources)     {         var actionClaims = new Collection<Claim>         {             new Claim(ActionType, action)         };         var resourceClaims = new Collection<Claim>         {             new Claim(ResourceType, resource)         };         if (additionalResources != null && additionalResources.Length > 0)         {             additionalResources.ToList().ForEach(ar => resourceClaims.Add(               new Claim(AdditionalResourceType, ar)));         }         return new WIF.AuthorizationContext(             principal,             resourceClaims,             actionClaims);     } }

    Read the article

  • A Web exception occurred because an HTTP 503 - ServiceUnavailable response was received from Unknown

    - by Dai
    As far as I can tell my Exchange 2010 Mailbox and Client Access server is working fine except for Outlook Anywhere. I fired up the Exchange Connectivity Tester and ran it against my server and I get this report: Part 5 Testing HTTP Authentication Methods for URL https://mail.contoso.com/rpc/rpcproxy.dll?server6.corp.contoso.com:6002. The HTTP authentication test failed. Additional details: A Web exception occurred because an HTTP 503 - ServiceUnavailable response was received from Unknown. When I do a search for "ServiceUnavailable response was received from Unknown." I get only a couple of relevant results, including a 22k-view Exchange Forum thread, but none of the solutions discussed help. There is nothing of relevance in the server's Event Log. mail.contoso.com is the public domain name of the CAS/MB/HT server. server6.corp.contoso.com is the internal domain name of the server.

    Read the article

  • loadbalancing with difference nginx location context and backend server context

    - by robinmag
    Hi, I used nginx and upstream module for load balancing with the following config upstream lb { server 127.0.0.1:8080; server 127.0.0.1:8081; } server { listen 88; server_name localhost; location /cas/ { proxy_pass http://lb; proxy_redirect off; proxy_connect_timeout 2; proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for; } } the problem is the "location /context/" have to match to the context of backend server so when i request localhost/context/index.html then nginx routes it to 127.0.0.1:8080/context/index.html or 127.0.0.1:8080/context/index.html. Is it possible to have difference backend context and nginx location for example with "location /" nginx will routes the request to 127.0.0.1:8080/context/index.html or 127.0.0.1:8080/context/index.html Thank you.

    Read the article

  • loadbalancing with difference nginx location context and backend context

    - by robinmag
    Hi, I used nginx and upstream module for load balancing with the following config upstream lb { server 127.0.0.1:8080; server 127.0.0.1:8081; } server { listen 88; server_name localhost; location /cas/ { proxy_pass http://lb; proxy_redirect off; proxy_connect_timeout 2; proxy_set_header Host $host; proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for; } } the problem is the "location /context/" have to match to the context of backend server so when i request localhost/context/index.html then nginx routes it to 127.0.0.1:8080/context/index.html or 127.0.0.1:8080/context/index.html. Is it possible to have difference backend context and nginx location for example with "location /" nginx will routes the request to 127.0.0.1:8080/context/index.html or 127.0.0.1:8080/context/index.html Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Active Directory Password Policy Problem

    - by Will
    To Clarify: my question is why isn't my password policy applying to people in the domain. Hey guys, having trouble with our password policy in Active Directory. Sometimes it just helps me to type out what I’m seeing It appears to not be applying properly across the board. I am new to this environment and AD in general but I think I have a general grasp of what should be going on. It’s a pretty simple AD setup without too many Group Policies being applied. It looks something like this DOMAIN Default Domain Policy (link enabled) Password Policy (link enabled and enforce) Personal OU Force Password Change (completely empty nothing in this GPO) IT OU Lockout Policy (link enabled and enforced) CS OU Lockout Policy Accouting OU Lockout Policy The password policy and default domain policy both define the same things under Computer ConfigWindows seetings sec settings Account Policies / Password Policy Enforce password History : 24 passwords remembered Maximum Password age : 180 days Min password age: 14 days Minimum Password Length: 6 characters Password must meet complexity requirements: Enabled Store Passwords using reversible encryption: Disabled Account Policies / Account Lockout Policy Account Lockout Duration 10080 Minutes Account Lockout Threshold: 5 invalid login attempts Reset Account Lockout Counter after : 30 minutes IT lockout This just sets the screen saver settings to lock computers when the user is Idle. After running Group Policy modeling it seems like the password policy and default domain policy is getting applied to everyone. Here is the results of group policy modeling on MO-BLANCKM using the mblanck account, as you can see the policies are both being applied , with nothing important being denied Group Policy Results NCLGS\mblanck on NCLGS\MO-BLANCKM Data collected on: 12/29/2010 11:29:44 AM Summary Computer Configuration Summary General Computer name NCLGS\MO-BLANCKM Domain NCLGS.local Site Default-First-Site-Name Last time Group Policy was processed 12/29/2010 10:17:58 AM Group Policy Objects Applied GPOs Name Link Location Revision Default Domain Policy NCLGS.local AD (15), Sysvol (15) WSUS-52010 NCLGS.local/WSUS/Clients AD (54), Sysvol (54) Password Policy NCLGS.local AD (58), Sysvol (58) Denied GPOs Name Link Location Reason Denied Local Group Policy Local Empty Security Group Membership when Group Policy was applied BUILTIN\Administrators Everyone S-1-5-21-507921405-1326574676-682003330-1003 BUILTIN\Users NT AUTHORITY\NETWORK NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users NCLGS\MO-BLANCKM$ NCLGS\Admin-ComputerAccounts-GP NCLGS\Domain Computers WMI Filters Name Value Reference GPO(s) None Component Status Component Name Status Last Process Time Group Policy Infrastructure Success 12/29/2010 10:17:59 AM EFS recovery Success (no data) 10/28/2010 9:10:34 AM Registry Success 10/28/2010 9:10:32 AM Security Success 10/28/2010 9:10:34 AM User Configuration Summary General User name NCLGS\mblanck Domain NCLGS.local Last time Group Policy was processed 12/29/2010 11:28:56 AM Group Policy Objects Applied GPOs Name Link Location Revision Default Domain Policy NCLGS.local AD (7), Sysvol (7) IT-Lockout NCLGS.local/Personal/CS AD (11), Sysvol (11) Password Policy NCLGS.local AD (5), Sysvol (5) Denied GPOs Name Link Location Reason Denied Local Group Policy Local Empty Force Password Change NCLGS.local/Personal Empty Security Group Membership when Group Policy was applied NCLGS\Domain Users Everyone BUILTIN\Administrators BUILTIN\Users NT AUTHORITY\INTERACTIVE NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users LOCAL NCLGS\MissingSkidEmail NCLGS\Customer_Service NCLGS\Email_Archive NCLGS\Job Ticket Users NCLGS\Office Staff NCLGS\CUSTOMER SERVI-1 NCLGS\Prestige_Jobs_Email NCLGS\Telecommuters NCLGS\Everyone - NCL WMI Filters Name Value Reference GPO(s) None Component Status Component Name Status Last Process Time Group Policy Infrastructure Success 12/29/2010 11:28:56 AM Registry Success 12/20/2010 12:05:51 PM Scripts Success 10/13/2010 10:38:40 AM Computer Configuration Windows Settings Security Settings Account Policies/Password Policy Policy Setting Winning GPO Enforce password history 24 passwords remembered Password Policy Maximum password age 180 days Password Policy Minimum password age 14 days Password Policy Minimum password length 6 characters Password Policy Password must meet complexity requirements Enabled Password Policy Store passwords using reversible encryption Disabled Password Policy Account Policies/Account Lockout Policy Policy Setting Winning GPO Account lockout duration 10080 minutes Password Policy Account lockout threshold 5 invalid logon attempts Password Policy Reset account lockout counter after 30 minutes Password Policy Local Policies/Security Options Network Security Policy Setting Winning GPO Network security: Force logoff when logon hours expire Enabled Default Domain Policy Public Key Policies/Autoenrollment Settings Policy Setting Winning GPO Enroll certificates automatically Enabled [Default setting] Renew expired certificates, update pending certificates, and remove revoked certificates Disabled Update certificates that use certificate templates Disabled Public Key Policies/Encrypting File System Properties Winning GPO [Default setting] Policy Setting Allow users to encrypt files using Encrypting File System (EFS) Enabled Certificates Issued To Issued By Expiration Date Intended Purposes Winning GPO SBurns SBurns 12/13/2007 5:24:30 PM File Recovery Default Domain Policy For additional information about individual settings, launch Group Policy Object Editor. Public Key Policies/Trusted Root Certification Authorities Properties Winning GPO [Default setting] Policy Setting Allow users to select new root certification authorities (CAs) to trust Enabled Client computers can trust the following certificate stores Third-Party Root Certification Authorities and Enterprise Root Certification Authorities To perform certificate-based authentication of users and computers, CAs must meet the following criteria Registered in Active Directory only Administrative Templates Windows Components/Windows Update Policy Setting Winning GPO Allow Automatic Updates immediate installation Enabled WSUS-52010 Allow non-administrators to receive update notifications Enabled WSUS-52010 Automatic Updates detection frequency Enabled WSUS-52010 Check for updates at the following interval (hours): 1 Policy Setting Winning GPO Configure Automatic Updates Enabled WSUS-52010 Configure automatic updating: 4 - Auto download and schedule the install The following settings are only required and applicable if 4 is selected. Scheduled install day: 0 - Every day Scheduled install time: 03:00 Policy Setting Winning GPO No auto-restart with logged on users for scheduled automatic updates installations Disabled WSUS-52010 Re-prompt for restart with scheduled installations Enabled WSUS-52010 Wait the following period before prompting again with a scheduled restart (minutes): 30 Policy Setting Winning GPO Reschedule Automatic Updates scheduled installations Enabled WSUS-52010 Wait after system startup (minutes): 1 Policy Setting Winning GPO Specify intranet Microsoft update service location Enabled WSUS-52010 Set the intranet update service for detecting updates: http://lavender Set the intranet statistics server: http://lavender (example: http://IntranetUpd01) User Configuration Administrative Templates Control Panel/Display Policy Setting Winning GPO Hide Screen Saver tab Enabled IT-Lockout Password protect the screen saver Enabled IT-Lockout Screen Saver Enabled IT-Lockout Screen Saver executable name Enabled IT-Lockout Screen Saver executable name sstext3d.scr Policy Setting Winning GPO Screen Saver timeout Enabled IT-Lockout Number of seconds to wait to enable the Screen Saver Seconds: 1800 System/Power Management Policy Setting Winning GPO Prompt for password on resume from hibernate / suspend Enabled IT-Lockout

    Read the article

  • How do I do a swing migration of Exchange 2007?

    - by Graeme Donaldson
    As per my previous question, I have an Exchange 2007 box which is also a DC. Since I can demote it while Exchange is installed, I need to a swing migration. Does anyone have any articles, tips or experiences to share on this? The last time I did a swing it was with Exchange 2003 and even that is a little rusty in my head. The setup is a single Exchange 2007 Hub/Edge/Mailbox/CAS server. Its currently on Windows Server 2008, I can migrate it to the same OS, or I can go to 2008 R2, I'm not really picky on that. We're running OWA/ActiveSync/POP3(S)/IMAP(S) for client access. I already have another fully functional DC/GC/DNS box in the same site and clients in the site are already using that for DNS. It's also the preferred site bridgehead for AD replication. Any tips?

    Read the article

  • Running Mathimatica-5 remotely

    - by oxinabox.ucc.asn.au
    Ok, I have Mathmatica 5 - a powerful CAS. I have a cheap netbook, wich not olny is too slow to run mathmatica on, I doubt it has the harddrive space. I do however have remote access to a number of very powerful computers, (most of wich run variose linuxes, but one of which is windows server 2008) Mostly over SSH but other protocols can be arraged for some, i'm sure. (I might even be able to remote desktop the windows server 2008) So I'ld like to install Mathmatica onto one of these machine and then run it remotely. Either from the command line via putty or via some other method. I glanced through the mathmatical documentaion and read soemthing about using some MathLink program, wich linkes the front end istalled on my computer to a remote kernal. Anyone have any expirience with this? I'm not sure if this belongs here or in SuperUser.

    Read the article

  • Exchange 2010 SP2 OWA performance

    - by Frederik Nielsen
    How do I increase performance in OWA 2010 SP2? I am running CAS on a seperate installation, which has 8GB RAM and 4 CPU cores - running virtualized in a vmware environment. However, the load times are pretty bad, so is there any way to improve those? I am thinking of installing a linux cache-stuff-server in front of the OWA, but will that work? And how should it be done? Allright, I "fixed" it - was just something temporary issue. Thanks for your replies

    Read the article

  • Migrate an intermediate CA to a new root

    - by Tim Brigham
    Using the Microsoft CA is there any way to cut over to a new certificate authority from an intermediate authority? Both my systems are Microsoft CAs - I have a 2008 R2 Enterprise CA (intermediate) and an old 2003 CA (root). The 2003 box bit the dust and I don't have good backups. I still have a few months before the CRL expires; instead of having to cut over to a new intermediate authority is there a ready way to simply point this intermediate authority to a new offline CA?

    Read the article

  • upgrading my computer system for office use

    - by denise ellul
    Presently I have the under-mentioned computer system. What should be changed and upgraded with the following products that I own presently? I am interested in performance issues related to cache memory, bus speed, RAM, CAS latency as well as other considerations. Thanks for your help. Processor (CPU): Intel Celeron Dual Core E3300 2.5 GHz Motherboard: Asus P5QPL-AM G41 Main Memory (RAM): 2 GB Team Elite DDR2 PC8000 Case: Coolermaster RC330 Power Supply Unit: 500W EZ-Cool Standard Storage Device (Hard Drive): 500GB Samsung Video Card: Intel GMA X4500 (On-board) Optical Drive: LG GH22NS50 Sound Card: AC 97 (On – board) Card Reader: Akasa Black TFT Monitor: 19” View Sonic Speakers: Logitech S120 2.0

    Read the article

  • How to set RpcClientAccessServer for a Exchange 2010 mailbox database to a load balancer

    - by Archit Baweja
    I have 2 Exchange 2010 servers each with a Mailbox Database. I have also setup a Hardware Load Balancer (KEMP LoadMaster 2200 to be precise) to load balance the CAS role access. My HLB has an IP of 192.168.1.100. I've setup the DNS A record for mail.mydomain.com to point to 192.168.1.100. However when I try to set the RpcClientAccessServer on a mailbox database using Set-MailboxDatabase "My Mailbox Database" -RpcClientAccessServer mail.mydomain.com I get an error saying Exchange server "mail.mydomain.com" was not found. Please make sure you have typed it correctly. + CategoryInfo : NotSpecified: (:) [], ManagementObjectNotFoundException + FullyQualifiedErrorId : 4082394C Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • How to decide where to purchase a wildcard SSL certificate?

    - by user664833
    Recently I needed to purchase a wildcard SSL certificate (because I need to secure a number of subdomains), and when I first searched for where to buy one I was overwhelmed with the number of choices, marketing claims, and price range. I created a list to help me see passed the marketing gimmicks that the greater majority of the Certificate Authorities (CAs) plaster all over their sites. In the end my personal conclusion is that pretty much the only things that matter are the price and the pleasantness of the CA's website. Question: Besides price and a nice website, is there anything worthy of my consideration in deciding where to purchase a wildcard SSL certificate?

    Read the article

  • memtest incorrectly recognizes my RAM

    - by Brendan Abel
    I recently built a computer and randomly got a couple blue screens. I've run memtest and one of the memory sticks consistently throws memtest errors, while the other does not. The odd part is, memtest lists the following settings for my RAM: RAM: 535 MHz DDR 107 / CAS 2.5-1-3-1 DDR1 128 bits But my RAM is DDR3 1600? Memtest also lists my cpu as AMD K8, even though it's K10. I've probably going to RMA the ram stick, but I just wanted to see if anyone had any insight into the weird memtest stats.

    Read the article

  • BES 5.x issues when connecting to Exchange 2010 SP2 RU4

    - by makerofthings7
    Ever since we updated from SP1 RU4 to SP2 RU4 we have noticed that our BES devices will simply stop receiving email. This has occurred at least 5 times in the past few weeks. Today, while speaking with RIM support (a T3 contract), they said that they have reports of sporadic connectivity issues from some BES users. This has been occurring with Exchange 2010 SP2 RU4, and have no public information to give us. We were able to temporarily get things running by doing any or all of the following Restart the BES server Recreate the MAPI profile (deleted the keys in the registry) Restart the CAS servers Wait it out (2 hours) What other options should I take to resolve this issue?

    Read the article

  • Exchange 2010 Autodiscover/OAB update issue

    - by bulldog5046
    Mid way through migration from 2003 to 2010 and with a few test users on 2010 i've noticed that the OAB is not being downloaded to outlook clients. I've checked the URL's are configured, addded both our CAS servers to the web based distribution list for the OAB and assigned the OAB to 2 mailbox databases we use but when i use outlook 'Test E-Mail AutoConfiguration' test i still see that the autodiscover says "OAB URL: Public Folder" even though i've now deselected the option. I've ran Test-OutlookWebServices to which i was getting an OAB error about no URL in the autodiscovery but having just re-ran it now appears fine, yey the autoconfigure test still does not. Does anyone have any idea why i'm getting this discrepency?

    Read the article

  • Oracle vous invite à un atelier découverte Oracle Coherence composé d’une présentation du produit et de ses concepts, suivi par des exercices pratiques.

    - by mseika
    Oracle vous invite à un atelier découverte Oracle Coherence composé d’une présentation du produit et de ses concepts, suivi par des exercices pratiques. Objectifs : Cet atelier est destiné aux populations suivantes : architectes, développeurs, ainsi que les responsables de projets. Le format retenu (1 journée) pour cet atelier vous permettra de mesurer ce qu’Oracle Coherence peut apporter à votre entreprise ou vos clients au travers de quelques exercices. Cette journée de prise en main vous permettra de mieux comprendre : Le positionnement d’Oracle Coherence au travers des différents cas d’utilisation rencontrés sur le marché français Les concepts technique d’Oracle Coherence Création d’une grille de données distribuée Insérer et lire des données dans un cache distribué Effectuer une requête sur un cache distribué Effectuer une aggrégation sur un cache distribué Etc… En fonction de votre niveau il y aura toujours un exercice supplémentaire à réaliser… Pré-requis :Matériel : Pour la session, chaque participant doit disposer de son pc portable avec un minimum de 4Go de RAM (idéalement Windows XP ou 7). Sur le PC on doit trouver déjà installés les éléments suivants : un Jdk 6, Eclipse dans une version récente, et Coherence 3.7. Technique : Eclipse et  Programmation Java niveau débutant (vous devez être à l’aise pour créer un projet Java, utiliser des librairies, compiler, exécuter, créer des configurations de lancement Eclipse, etc…). Durée : 1 jour L'équipe Enablement Oracle France.NB: Merci de prévoir les frais liés au déjeuner qui n'est pas pris en charge par Oracle

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14  | Next Page >