Search Results

Search found 2516 results on 101 pages for 'gigabit ethernet'.

Page 11/101 | < Previous Page | 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  | Next Page >

• High number of ethernet errors. Tool for testing the ethernet card?

  - by Fabio Dalla Libera

  I have an Asus Sabertooth X79. I often get corrupted files. I checked the RAM, but memtest finds no errors. To avoid the possibility of disk errors, I tried copying the files to tmpfs. If I copy from the network, I get md5sum mismatches about once every 10 times using a 6Gb file. Copying from RAM to RAM, I didn't get mismatches. I get a very high number of errors in ifconfig (compared to others PCs I just took as reference, which have 0 with much more traffic). Here is an example RX packets:13972848 errors:200 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:101 The motherboard is new, but do you think there're some problems with it? What could I use to test the (integrated) network adapter? What else do you think I should double check? --edit-- I tried another NIC, it gives a lot of Corrupted MAC on Input. Disconnecting: Packet corrupt lost connection. I noticed that another PC downloads at 11.1MB/s without problems. This pc at 66.0 MB/s. Is there any way to try to limit the speed?

  Read the article

• Switching between ethernet interfaces on Ubuntu 10.04 SERVER

  - by Chaitanya

  I have ubuntu 10.04 "SERVER" installed on a system with two ehternet ports. I use only one at a time. I wanted to know if I can switch between ports without using ifup and ifdown every time. That means when I connect my Lan cable on eth0 it should work and it does. But when I disconnect the lan cable and connect it on eth1 I have to ifdown eth0 and only then it works. In my /etc/network/interfaces file I have configured both eth0 and eth1. there is no problem other than I have to switch it manually with ifdown and ifup everytime. Please guide. Thanks in advance

  Read the article

• Using two ethernet connections (Internet enabled) simultaneously

  - by vedarthk

  I have searched and read over the Internet and also on askubuntu. i am using Ubuntu 11.04 and my question or the thing that I want to achieve is efficient use of both the connections and thus increasing my browsing and downloading speed. I want my system to decide which packet should be routed over which interface. I want to know if this is possible. For example, Is it possible to route alternate packets over the two interfaces ? Please let me know any Internet resource or If I would have to insert any code into the network drivers etc. ?

  Read the article

• Configuring ethernet network

  - by den-javamaniac

  Hi. I've got a wired network connection and if I'm using network manager (hereafter "NM") everything works fine except for the hardware address (it doesn't change). I'm thinking of using /etc/network/interfaces. So, I added some code and it looks like this: auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto eth1 iface eth1 inet static address #corresponding value netmask #corresponding value gateway #corresponding value hwaddress #corresponding value After restarting networking I get the following message: *Reconfiguring network interfaces... #here some help code appears Failed to bring up eth1. The default interface that works with NM is eth0. Please advise on how to handle the problem.

  Read the article

• Switch between network configurations via command line in fedora 17

  - by Mike Fairhurst

  I have two different setups I use on my work laptop; one enables synergy over an ethernet ssh tunnel with my work computer on the local network, and the other opens an HTTP tunnel to my work computer from outside the network. When I have wifi enabled at work, my laptop seems to use it by preference. This makes synergy run incredibly slowly. At home I must use wifi. I have scripts that begin my ssh tunnels, add my ssh keys, and starts up other programs like synergy, and close themselves when I shut my laptop. However, every day I have to start out my routine by opening my gnome-control-center and turning on my ethernet. I have tried route add and ifup, none of it works, so I dove into gnome-control-center's source code and found that it enabled the connection by libnm's method nm_client_activate_connection with some libnm specific structs that I am having trouble tracking down. I'm not much of a c programmer, and I'm not familiar with either GTK or libnm. Does anybody know what fedora 17 does with ethernet connections to fully enable them? Or does anybody know what libnm does to fully enable an ethernet connection? Do I have to write a c script to run libnm for me to fully emulate whatever gnome-control-center is trying to do?

  Read the article

• Networking OSX 10.6 and Vista via ethernet?

  - by Moshe

  How can I make Vista home premium access OS X hard drive? and the other way around? I'd like to transfer files via direct ethernet. Plugging in an ethernet cable makes both computers recognize a network, but not the other device. Each firewall is turned off, but no luck. Edit: I don't see Windows Sharing in the Service Column.

  Read the article

• WiFi & GbE Slow while Both Active.

  - by Mark Tomlin

  I'm having a problem with my WiFi network connection when I use my wired GbE connection concurrently on my Laptop. I'm using my WiFi for Internet access, and general web surfing and I'm using my GbE connection to connect to my PlayStation so I can stream media. The WiFi connection is via a Linksys 610N connected to my Cable Modem. Where as the GbE connection is a direct connection from my Ethernet port to the Ethernet port of the PS3 via a Cat-5 cable (no router in between this connection). As soon as I connect the cable from the PS3 to my Ethernet port on my Laptop the WiFi connection slows to a halt, but then allows for a connection to the web as normal but at much slower speeds for the things like BitTorrent that stops completely. It seems to me that Windows can't handle both connections at once. It will have both active but it can only accept and send packets on one device at one time. I can get WiFi connections to work to go to websites and the like, but once I use my GbE connection to share media between my Laptop and my PS3 the Wifi connection dies out and I no longer have access to the internet. I setup my connection on the PS3 and the Laptop following the insturctions posted here: http://forums.finalgear.com/problems/s14e01-ps3-size-problem-40642/#post1188132 And the following is the results of my ipconfig. Windows IP Configuration Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : dygear Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No Ethernet adapter WiFi: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-19-**-**-**-** Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.111 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1 DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1 DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1 167.206.254.2 167.206.254.1 Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : Wednesday, May 19, 2010 08:55:30 Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : Thursday, May 20, 2010 08:55:30 Ethernet adapter LAN: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-16-**-**-**-** Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.50 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : Any ideas?

  Read the article

• How to wire 20 computers and 20 phones and 1 server into LAN?

  - by John Smith

  I have currently 3 switches Two Netgear JFS524 with 24 slots, One Belkin with 16 slots. Server DSL Internet Router. Main question is how to connect switches together, two Netgear's are next to each other, yet one is about 100 feet away and holds about 5 computer and 5 phones. If i connect them with only 1 wire will that limit bandwidth? e.g. all 23 computers will be limited to speed of one CAT5e cable? If i connect switches with 2 cables will this give speed boost? What's the ideal scenario should i just move the third switch next to other two? Will the speed of computer connected to white switch be same as computer connected to top switch? Will moving white switch right next top switch and having 16 wires comming 100 feet instead of 1 wire comming 100 feet make it faster? EDIT 1: I actually have NETGEAR ProSafe GS105 Gigabit switch its only has 4 ports in it though, you think i can have use of it in current setup? Like connect all 3 switches and server into it and keep internet router and phone server on one of the slower switches EDIT 2: Everyone mention gigabit switches, but will they do any difference with 10/100 network cards? I then have to use gigabit cards in every computer too? I could in server perhaps, but users will be 10/100

  Read the article

• Computer sending data while turned of

  - by Nicklas Ansman

  I have a some what strange problem (which could have and easy and obvious solution for all I know). My problem is that when I've booted ubuntu (now 10.4 but same problem with 9.10) and turns it off it starts sending a HUGE amount of data via the ethernet cable, so much in fact that my router can't handle it and stops responding. As far as I can tell the computer is completely turned off with no fans spinning. I can add that if I boot windows I do not have this problem, just when exiting ubuntu. There are two "fixes" for my problem: Pull the ethernet cable until the next boot Turn off power to the PSU and wait for the capacitors to unload Is there anyone who knows what could be going on? I'd be happy to post some logs or conf-files. Currently I'm using the ethernet port on my motherboard which is a Asus P6T Deluxe V2 with an updated version of the BIOS (maybe not the latest but since it only happens when I've been in ubuntu I don't wanna mess with the BIOS too much). Regards Nicklas

  Read the article

• Laptop dual ethernet?

  - by mgb

  Anyone know of a laptop with dual gigabit ethernet ports?

  Read the article

• Laptop dual ethernet?

  - by mgb

  Anyone know of a laptop with dual gigabit ethernet ports?

  Read the article

• can not access dlink 604 set up interface

  - by user36089

  Hello everyone I used dlink-di604 enthernet board as router to share web access. My ISP provides the service base on Ethernet rathern than base on Ethernet pppoe mode. It is manually setup ipv4, subnet mask , DNS, Gateway etc Log in using web user name&password. I use http://192.168.0.2 try to access dlink di604 setup inferface, but failed I call command ipconfig /all Dos shell displayed: Ethernet adapter Local Connection: Physical Address: 00-3c-56-79-19-49 IPv4 address:10.7.8.225 subnet mask: 255.255.255.0 default gate way: 10.7.8.1 DNS servers 10.10.10.10 What is the correct way to access dlink 604 setup interface and set to share web access? Welcome any comment Thanks interdev

  Read the article

• Two network adapters in one WindowsXP PC, how to make them work?

  - by Deele

  I have a need to set up network so I can use two ethernet cards inside one Windows (Windows XP SP2) based PC, one for internet connection, second, for internal LAN. How should I configure each NIC, with what IP's, subnet masks and gateways, so I can use inernet on my PC and get in touch with devices on my LAN? I have found that there are some sort of re routing nessesary inside my PC, but how does it work? I have already set up some configuration already, but I can't use it together with PC #1 NIC #1 connected. I need to disconnect, to access NIC WEB interface. Current configuration: Switch #1 and PC #1 NAS #2 are gigabit one's, so I could access NAS with gigabit speed. PC #1 NIC #1 IP XX.XXX.162.106 SN 255.255.255.248 GW XX.XXX.162.105 PC #1 NIC #2 IP 10.0.0.1 SN 255.255.0.0 GW 0.0.0.0 NAS #1 NIC #1 IP 10.0.0.12 SN 255.255.0.0 GW 0.0.0.0 My question is - what exact configuration should I do for every NIC in this LAN, so it would work? Is it possible to achieve internet access for Laptop, that is inside that NIC #2 LAN (should I just set up basic ICS)?

  Read the article

• Simple way to make wired internet wireless without router

  - by Anriëtte Combrink

  Hi there Is there any device which you can plug into an Ethernet port and then have it broadcast the internet connection it receives through Ethernet wirelessly with a set password (maybe a serial number on device itself)? The problem is, I have a Wi-fi capable device, an iPhone and I want to use the wired internet connection in a hotel room, but the iPhone needs a Wi-fi signal. How can I accomplish this with a rather simplistic device. // EDIT: Can this be achieved with an Apple Airport Express?

  Read the article

• Wireless vs. Wired: which is faster?

  - by studiohack

  I have the option of hooking up my machines to the internet either wirelessly or via ethernet cable (wired). I'm curious as to which is faster; the approximate wireless signal strength (average) is about 60%. My question is, would my internet be faster if I used ethernet, resulting in a stronger connection?

  Read the article

• Is TCP/IP encapsulation MSB or LSB?

  - by Justin

  Application data sent over TCP experiences multiple encapsulations: The application data is encapsulated within one or many TCP fragments The TCP fragment is encapsulated within one or many IP datagrams The IP datagram is encapsulated within one or many Ethernet frames It turns out Ethernet frames are sent most-significant byte first, and within each byte, most-significant bit first. What about the multiple encapsulations? Are they performed MSB first or LSB first?

  Read the article

• ifdown em1 Users cannot control this device. Allow users to control em1 device

  - by Eric Leschinski

  I want to allow users to control the em1 device in Linux: When I run this command: ifdown em1 em1 is the embedded ethernet card 1, I want the user to be able to turn off the ethernet card. On Fedora 17, I get this error message: Users cannot control this device I want a certain user to be able to run a certain command on Linux without giving rights to other users. What is the best way to do that?

  Read the article

• HTG Explains: Understanding Routers, Switches, and Network Hardware

  - by Jason Fitzpatrick

  Today we’re taking a look at the home networking hardware: what the individual pieces do, when you need them, and how best to deploy them. Read on to get a clearer picture of what you need to optimize your home network. When do you need a switch? A hub? What exactly does a router do? Do you need a router if you have a single computer? Network technology can be quite an arcane area of study but armed with the right terms and a general overview of how devices function on your home network you can deploy your network with confidence. HTG Explains: Understanding Routers, Switches, and Network Hardware How to Use Offline Files in Windows to Cache Your Networked Files Offline How to See What Web Sites Your Computer is Secretly Connecting To

  Read the article

• Unable to keep the connecting using a wireless bridge

  - by dan

  I am running Ubuntu 12.04 on a dell inspiron desktop (core 2 duo) and am using wicd to manage my network/wifi. I've found that the WiFi card in the machine has trouble staying connected to my router (I believe this is a function of distance between the two), so I've taken an old Belkin F5d7231 wireless router and installed dd-wrt on it to use as a wireless bridge hoping that it will have better reception. I think everything up through the wireless bridge is working OK since I have no problems accessing the internet through it with my MacBook. The problem arises when I try to hook the ubuntu machine up to the wireless bridge. It will connect for a few minutes, but it will quickly disconnect without clear triggering event; it may be more likely to disconnect if there is a heavy traffic load going over it (could be something as simple as "cat big_text_file" in an ssh session). I've tried switching from dhclient to dhcpcd without much improvement. Here is the output from the syslog when it connects: Jun 30 17:10:08 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28278]: wlan1: dhcpcd not running Jun 30 17:10:08 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28278]: wlan1: exiting Jun 30 17:10:08 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28312]: eth0: dhcpcd not running Jun 30 17:10:08 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28312]: eth0: exiting Jun 30 17:10:08 Chicabuntu avahi-daemon[1041]: Interface eth0.IPv6 no longer relevant for mDNS. Jun 30 17:10:08 Chicabuntu avahi-daemon[1041]: Leaving mDNS multicast group on interface eth0.IPv6 with address fe80::21c:c4ff:fe31:1a83. Jun 30 17:10:08 Chicabuntu avahi-daemon[1041]: Withdrawing address record for fe80::21c:c4ff:fe31:1a83 on eth0. Jun 30 17:10:08 Chicabuntu kernel: [15184.976127] tg3 0000:3f:00.0: irq 44 for MSI/MSI-X Jun 30 17:10:08 Chicabuntu kernel: [15185.010805] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready Jun 30 17:10:08 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28347]: eth0: dhcpcd not running Jun 30 17:10:08 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28347]: eth0: exiting Jun 30 17:10:08 Chicabuntu kernel: [15185.180156] tg3 0000:3f:00.0: irq 44 for MSI/MSI-X Jun 30 17:10:08 Chicabuntu kernel: [15185.212785] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready Jun 30 17:10:10 Chicabuntu kernel: [15187.027445] tg3 0000:3f:00.0: eth0: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full duplex Jun 30 17:10:10 Chicabuntu kernel: [15187.027452] tg3 0000:3f:00.0: eth0: Flow control is on for TX and on for RX Jun 30 17:10:10 Chicabuntu kernel: [15187.028300] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready Jun 30 17:10:10 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28353]: eth0: dhcpcd 3.2.3 starting Jun 30 17:10:10 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28353]: eth0: hardware address = 00:1c:c4:31:1a:83 Jun 30 17:10:10 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28353]: eth0: DUID = 00:01:00:01:17:81:85:79:00:1c:c4:31:1a:83 Jun 30 17:10:10 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28353]: eth0: broadcasting for a lease Jun 30 17:10:11 Chicabuntu avahi-daemon[1041]: Joining mDNS multicast group on interface eth0.IPv6 with address fe80::21c:c4ff:fe31:1a83. Jun 30 17:10:11 Chicabuntu avahi-daemon[1041]: New relevant interface eth0.IPv6 for mDNS. Jun 30 17:10:11 Chicabuntu avahi-daemon[1041]: Registering new address record for fe80::21c:c4ff:fe31:1a83 on eth0.*. Jun 30 17:10:20 Chicabuntu kernel: [15197.568016] eth0: no IPv6 routers present Jun 30 17:10:29 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28353]: eth0: offered 192.168.1.111 from 192.168.1.254 Jun 30 17:10:29 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28353]: eth0: checking 192.168.1.111 is available on attached networks Jun 30 17:10:30 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28353]: eth0: leased 192.168.1.111 for 86400 seconds Jun 30 17:10:30 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28353]: eth0: adding IP address 192.168.1.111/24 Jun 30 17:10:30 Chicabuntu avahi-daemon[1041]: Joining mDNS multicast group on interface eth0.IPv4 with address 192.168.1.111. Jun 30 17:10:30 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28353]: eth0: adding default route via 192.168.1.254 metric 0 Jun 30 17:10:30 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28353]: eth0: exiting Jun 30 17:10:30 Chicabuntu avahi-daemon[1041]: New relevant interface eth0.IPv4 for mDNS. Jun 30 17:10:30 Chicabuntu avahi-daemon[1041]: Registering new address record for 192.168.1.111 on eth0.IPv4. Jun 30 17:10:30 Chicabuntu dhcpcd.sh: interface eth0 has been configured with new IP=192.168.1.111 Jun 30 17:10:39 Chicabuntu ntpdate[28439]: adjust time server 91.189.94.4 offset 0.001915 sec And here is the syslog from when it shuts down the connection without reason: Jun 30 17:12:15 Chicabuntu kernel: [15312.575455] tg3 0000:3f:00.0: eth0: Link is down Jun 30 17:12:16 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28603]: eth0: sending signal 1 to pid 28361 Jun 30 17:12:16 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28361]: eth0: received SIGHUP, releasing lease Jun 30 17:12:16 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28603]: eth0: exiting Jun 30 17:12:16 Chicabuntu avahi-daemon[1041]: Withdrawing address record for 192.168.1.111 on eth0. Jun 30 17:12:16 Chicabuntu avahi-daemon[1041]: Leaving mDNS multicast group on interface eth0.IPv4 with address 192.168.1.111. Jun 30 17:12:16 Chicabuntu avahi-daemon[1041]: Interface eth0.IPv4 no longer relevant for mDNS. Jun 30 17:12:16 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28361]: eth0: removing default route via 192.168.1.254 metric 0 Jun 30 17:12:16 Chicabuntu avahi-daemon[1041]: Interface eth0.IPv6 no longer relevant for mDNS. Jun 30 17:12:16 Chicabuntu avahi-daemon[1041]: Leaving mDNS multicast group on interface eth0.IPv6 with address fe80::21c:c4ff:fe31:1a83. Jun 30 17:12:16 Chicabuntu avahi-daemon[1041]: Withdrawing address record for fe80::21c:c4ff:fe31:1a83 on eth0. Jun 30 17:12:16 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28361]: eth0: netlink: No such process Jun 30 17:12:16 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28361]: eth0: removing IP address 192.168.1.111/24 Jun 30 17:12:16 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28361]: eth0: netlink: Cannot assign requested address Jun 30 17:12:16 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28361]: eth0: exiting Jun 30 17:12:16 Chicabuntu dhcpcd.sh: interface eth0 has been brought down Jun 30 17:12:17 Chicabuntu kernel: [15313.612141] tg3 0000:3f:00.0: irq 44 for MSI/MSI-X Jun 30 17:12:17 Chicabuntu kernel: [15313.644703] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready Jun 30 17:12:17 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28674]: wlan1: dhcpcd not running Jun 30 17:12:17 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28674]: wlan1: exiting Jun 30 17:12:17 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28708]: eth0: dhcpcd not running Jun 30 17:12:17 Chicabuntu dhcpcd[28708]: eth0: exiting Jun 30 17:12:17 Chicabuntu kernel: [15313.912147] tg3 0000:3f:00.0: irq 44 for MSI/MSI-X Jun 30 17:12:17 Chicabuntu kernel: [15313.944746] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready Jun 30 17:12:18 Chicabuntu kernel: [15315.592569] tg3 0000:3f:00.0: eth0: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full duplex Jun 30 17:12:18 Chicabuntu kernel: [15315.592576] tg3 0000:3f:00.0: eth0: Flow control is on for TX and on for RX Jun 30 17:12:18 Chicabuntu kernel: [15315.593399] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready Jun 30 17:12:20 Chicabuntu avahi-daemon[1041]: Joining mDNS multicast group on interface eth0.IPv6 with address fe80::21c:c4ff:fe31:1a83. Jun 30 17:12:20 Chicabuntu avahi-daemon[1041]: New relevant interface eth0.IPv6 for mDNS. Jun 30 17:12:20 Chicabuntu avahi-daemon[1041]: Registering new address record for fe80::21c:c4ff:fe31:1a83 on eth0.*. Jun 30 17:12:29 Chicabuntu kernel: [15325.680019] eth0: no IPv6 routers present If this isn't useful, I can also post the wicd log, but that is kind of long. If anyone could help me I would be eternally grateful.

  Read the article

• Question for class

  - by Tyler

  I have a question for class that I cannot figure out, I was hoping the helpful folks at Ask Ubuntu could help. The question is basically this: Your Linux system appears to have a DHCP problem. You decide to release and renew the DHCP lease by running the following command "SUDO IFCONFIG ETH0 DOWN". The command gives an error message saying Linux doesn't recognize the command. What's the problem? Any ideas? Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• Pppoe wireless connection, Ubuntu 12.4

  - by Barbara

  I recently bought a new computer (Asus 1015 cx) with Ubuntu (12.4) as preinstalled system. My problem is with the internet. The computer connects just fine to the free wifi we have at home, but in college, we have a little bit different system. There is wifi, but it is not free - everyone receives a user name and a password. I cant manage to estabilish this Pppoe connection - the computer "sees" where can it connect, but I dont know where to write my username and password. It is not the DSL connection, what I have already tried. Can you help me?

  Read the article

• My hardware MAC address is always 00:00:00:00:00:00 until I manually update 'eth0'. How can I fix this?

  - by user57184

  I am using Ubuntu 12.04. I use a wired connection. My network MAC address shows as 00:00:00:00:00:00. When I enter the commands below into a terminal window, it starts working again. sudo ifconfig eth0 down sudo ifconfig eth0 hw ether my mac address sudo ifconfig eth0 up I have to enter these commands every time I want to use the Internet. How can I fix this? Update copied from comment The contents of my /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf file is: [main] plugins=ifupdown,keyfile dns=dnsmasq no-auto-default=00:00:00:00:00:00, [ifupdown] managed=false

  Read the article

• HP DL360 G6 NC328i Dual Port Gigabit - Windows Server 2003 R2 Driver Problem

  - by brianjd

  I recently installed Windows Server 2003 R2 (64) on a DL360 G6 without using the SmartStart CD (it didn't like the MSDN media). But when I attempted to install the network drivers post-install using the packages from the HP website, I wasn't successful. Though I selected the correct package, the installer reported I did not have the necessary hardware configuration. Has anyone had a similar experience? Thanks

  Read the article

• Share laptop Wi-Fi with router set up as access point via ethernet cables

  - by obie

  I have an ADSL modem which serves as a wireless router. There's a laptop connected to it through cable. On the other room I have a laptop which is connected through the router wirelessly. Since I have other appliances that need to get connected but are not Wi-Fi capable I have another Wi-Fi router. How can I share the second laptop's Wi-Fi with the second router so that the router can then serve as an access point to give internet to my other appliances through ethernet cables? I want something like this: INTERNETMODEM (WIFI)LAPTOP 1 (WIFI)LAPTOP 2 (WIFI)Router 2 (ETHERNET)DREAMBOX & WDTV What I've tried so far is opened the admin interface of router 2 then set static IP 192.168.100.13 and disabled the DHCP. The DHCP of the main router starts with 192.168.100.1 then I hooked up router 2 with the laptop 2 through Cat5 cable but for some reason it's not working.

  Read the article

• LAN not picking up gigabit connection through patch panel

  - by user332555

  I have just purchased 2 FVS318G switches to install at my store. How this is set up is the server is in the back room. We have Cat 5E ran up through the ceiling and is patched into a panel in the back room. The 2 switches I just purchased are right next to the server in the back where all the cables patch in. I do a direct connection from the server to switch, avoiding the patch panel completely, and receive 1.0 gbps connection no problem. When i patch in the register computers from the front into the panel and then to the switch I am only getting 100 mbps on the registers up front. The patch panel does say Cat 5E on it but I am not sure if there is any interference in the line somewhere and I cannot get the full 1.0 gbps to the front registers like I want. Any ideas??

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  | Next Page >