Search Results

Search found 13249 results on 530 pages for 'virtualized performance'.

Page 111/530 | < Previous Page | 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118  | Next Page >

  • Best way to monitor a Grid of computers?

    - by marc.riera
    I've installed Sun Grid Engine on 10 nodes, and one virtual master host. Now I have to monitor all the resources prior to launching it into production, but I don't know which is the best way. I've tried using xml-qstat, but it seems unstable. Any tips or suggestions? Anyone got experience on this? thanks.

    Read the article

  • SQL server queries are really slow only on first run

    - by JoelFan
    Somewhat strange problem... when I start my .NET app for the first time after rebooting my machine, the SQL Server queries are really slow... when I pause the debugger, I notice that it's hanging on getting the response from the query. This only happens when connecting to a remote SQL server (2008)... if I connect to one on my local machine, it's fine. Also, if I restart the app, it works fast, even off the remote SQL server, and subsequent runs are also fine. The only problem is when I connect to a remote SQL server for the first time after rebooting my machine. What's more, I have even noticed this same exact behavior with a 3rd party app (also .NET) that also connects to a remote SQL server. Another piece of info... this has only started hapenning since I upgraded my machine from XP to Win7 (64 bit). Also, other developers on my team who upgraded to Win7 are seeing the same behavior (both with the app we're developing and the 3rd party .NET app). (copied from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2014814/sql-server-queries-are-really-slow-only-on-first-run )

    Read the article

  • AMD 24 core server memory bandwidth

    - by ntherning
    I need some help to determine whether the memory bandwidth I'm seeing under Linux on my server is normal or not. Here's the server spec: HP ProLiant DL165 G7 2x AMD Opteron 6164 HE 12-Core 40 GB RAM (10 x 4GB DDR1333) Debian 6.0 Using mbw on this server I get the following numbers: foo1:~# mbw -n 3 1024 Long uses 8 bytes. Allocating 2*134217728 elements = 2147483648 bytes of memory. Using 262144 bytes as blocks for memcpy block copy test. Getting down to business... Doing 3 runs per test. 0 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.58047 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 1764.082 MiB/s 1 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.58012 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 1765.152 MiB/s 2 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.58010 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 1765.201 MiB/s AVG Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.58023 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 1764.811 MiB/s 0 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.36174 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 2830.778 MiB/s 1 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.35869 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 2854.817 MiB/s 2 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.35848 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 2856.481 MiB/s AVG Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.35964 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 2847.310 MiB/s 0 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.23546 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 4348.860 MiB/s 1 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.23544 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 4349.230 MiB/s 2 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.23544 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 4349.359 MiB/s AVG Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.23545 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 4349.149 MiB/s On one of my other servers (based on Intel Xeon E3-1270): foo2:~# mbw -n 3 1024 Long uses 8 bytes. Allocating 2*134217728 elements = 2147483648 bytes of memory. Using 262144 bytes as blocks for memcpy block copy test. Getting down to business... Doing 3 runs per test. 0 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.18960 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 5400.901 MiB/s 1 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.18922 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 5411.690 MiB/s 2 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.18944 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 5405.491 MiB/s AVG Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.18942 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 5406.024 MiB/s 0 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.14838 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 6901.200 MiB/s 1 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.14818 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 6910.561 MiB/s 2 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.14820 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 6909.628 MiB/s AVG Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.14825 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 6907.127 MiB/s 0 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.04362 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 23477.623 MiB/s 1 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.04262 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 24025.151 MiB/s 2 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.04258 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 24048.849 MiB/s AVG Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.04294 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 23847.599 MiB/s For reference here's what I get on my Intel based laptop: laptop:~$ mbw -n 3 1024 Long uses 8 bytes. Allocating 2*134217728 elements = 2147483648 bytes of memory. Using 262144 bytes as blocks for memcpy block copy test. Getting down to business... Doing 3 runs per test. 0 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.40566 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 2524.269 MiB/s 1 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.38458 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 2662.638 MiB/s 2 Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.38876 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 2634.043 MiB/s AVG Method: MEMCPY Elapsed: 0.39300 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 2605.600 MiB/s 0 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.30707 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 3334.745 MiB/s 1 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.30425 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 3365.653 MiB/s 2 Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.30342 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 3374.849 MiB/s AVG Method: DUMB Elapsed: 0.30491 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 3358.328 MiB/s 0 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.07875 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 13003.670 MiB/s 1 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.08374 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 12228.034 MiB/s 2 Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.07635 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 13411.216 MiB/s AVG Method: MCBLOCK Elapsed: 0.07961 MiB: 1024.00000 Copy: 12862.006 MiB/s So according to mbw my laptop is 3 times faster than the server!!! Please help me explain this. I've also tried to mount a ram disk and use dd to benchmark it and I get similar differences so I don't think mbw is to blame. I've checked the BIOS settings and the memory seem to be running at full speed. According to the hosting company the modules are all OK. Could this have something to do with NUMA? It seems like Node Interleaving is disabled on this server. Will enabling it (thus turning off NUMA) make a difference? foo1:~# numactl --hardware available: 4 nodes (0-3) node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 node 0 size: 8190 MB node 0 free: 7898 MB node 1 cpus: 6 7 8 9 10 11 node 1 size: 12288 MB node 1 free: 12073 MB node 2 cpus: 18 19 20 21 22 23 node 2 size: 12288 MB node 2 free: 12034 MB node 3 cpus: 12 13 14 15 16 17 node 3 size: 8192 MB node 3 free: 8032 MB node distances: node 0 1 2 3 0: 10 20 20 20 1: 20 10 20 20 2: 20 20 10 20 3: 20 20 20 10

    Read the article

  • Mysql queries stuck in "sending data" state

    - by MarkPW
    I'm running a Litespeed web server and a database server (2 x Clovertown 5335) with MySQL 5.1.52-log (running on Cent OS 4.5 and 4.6 32bit respectively). Last week, I upgraded from 5.0.51a-community-log and since then I've been having a problem whereby my database server's load starts increasing for no apparent reason. Running SHOW PROCESSLIST; I see all of my SQL_CACHE queries that use a wildcard in WHERE, backing up and getting stuck in "sending data" state. However, other queries that use SQL_CACHE but no wildcard do not get caught up in this. To get things going again, the first time it happens (after about 24 hours), I have to restart mysql. 4/5 times it will re-occur after about 20 minutes or so and this time and for subsequent occurrences it is not necessary to restart mysql. Simply stopping the web server for a few minutes will suffice while I allow the stuck queries to clear themselves up. I had no such problem with the the previous mysql install. What could be causing the issue and how do I resolve it? Thanks

    Read the article

  • amazon ec2 pricing

    - by Pradyut Bhattacharya
    I m really confused. I was trying to buy hosting at amazon ec2. My site will not be having much of a traffic and i will be installing glassfish and mysql. Usage will be 1gb of ram and around less than 5gb of hardisk and same bandwidth. As mine is a startup, the number of hits per day would be less than 20hits per day, each hit having around 10mins time. How should i calculate the price on the ec2 calculator. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Lot of FIN_WAIT2, CLOSE_WAIT , LAST_ACK and TIME_WAIT in Haproxy

    - by Tux
    We are running haproxy in production for around 10k+ concurrent users . But we are seeing lot of FIN_WAIT2, CLOSE_WAIT , LAST_ACK and TIME_WAIT in the netstat output. This output is on a 8G ubuntu-12.04 node. 8046 CLOSE_WAIT 1 CLOSING 1 established) 40869 ESTABLISHED 1212 FIN_WAIT1 7575 FIN_WAIT2 1 Foreign 2252 LAST_ACK 7 LISTEN 143 SYN_RECV 4920 TIME_WAIT Can someone please tell me what tweaking i need to do. Please note that all these connections are persistent connections . tcp_fin_timeout = 30 tcp_keepalive_time = 1800 Right now, the application is working fine. But wondering will be there any issues as we add more users to this haproxy node.

    Read the article

  • MySQL on Linux out of memory

    - by Sunrays
    OS: Redhat Enterprise Linux Server Release 5.3 (Tikanga) Architecture: Intel Xeon 64Bit MySQL Server 5.5.20 Enterprise Server advanced edition. Application: Liferay. My database size is 200MB. RAM is 64GB. The memory consumption increases gradually and we run out of memory. Then only rebooting releases all the memory, but then process of memory consumption starts again and reaches 63-64GB in less than a day. Parameters detail: key_buffer_size=16M innodb_buffer_pool_size=3GB inndb_buffer_pool_instances=3 max_connections=1000 innodb_flush_method=O_DIRECT innodb_change_buffering=inserts read_buffer_size=2M read_rnd_buffer_size=256K It's a serious production server issue that I am facing. What could be the reason behind this and how to resolve. This is the report of 2pm today, after Linux was rebooted yesterday @ around 10pm. Output of free -m total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 64455 22053 42402 0 1544 1164 -/+ buffers/cache: 19343 45112 Swap: 74998 0 74998 Output of vmstat 2 5 procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- -----cpu------ r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa st 0 0 0 43423976 1583700 1086616 0 0 1 173 22 27 1 1 98 0 0 2 0 0 43280200 1583712 1228636 0 0 0 146 1265 491 2 2 96 1 0 0 0 0 43421940 1583724 1087160 0 0 0 138 1469 738 2 1 97 0 0 1 0 0 43422604 1583728 1086736 0 0 0 5816 1615 934 1 1 97 0 0 0 0 0 43422372 1583732 1086752 0 0 0 2784 1323 545 2 1 97 0 0 Output of top -n 3 -b top - 14:16:22 up 16:32, 5 users, load average: 0.79, 0.77, 0.93 Tasks: 345 total, 1 running, 344 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 1.0%us, 0.9%sy, 0.0%ni, 98.1%id, 0.1%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Mem: 66002772k total, 22656292k used, 43346480k free, 1582152k buffers Swap: 76798724k total, 0k used, 76798724k free, 1163616k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 6434 mysql 15 0 4095m 841m 5500 S 113.5 1.3 426:53.69 mysqld 1 root 15 0 10344 680 572 S 0.0 0.0 0:03.09 init 2 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 migration/0 3 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/0 4 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/0 5 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 migration/1 6 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/1 7 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/1 8 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/2 9 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/2 10 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/2 11 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/3 12 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/3 13 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/3 14 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/4 15 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/4 16 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/4 17 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/5 18 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/5 19 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/5 20 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/6 21 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/6 22 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/6 23 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/7 24 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/7 25 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/7 26 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/8 27 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/8 28 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/8 29 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/9 30 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/9 31 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/9 32 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/10 33 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/10 34 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/10 35 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/11 36 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/11 37 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/11 38 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/12 39 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/12 40 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/12 41 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/13 42 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/13 43 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/13 44 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/14 45 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/14 46 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/14 47 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/15 48 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 ksoftirqd/15 49 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/15 50 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/16 51 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/16 52 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/16 53 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/17 54 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/17 55 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/17 56 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/18 57 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/18 58 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/18 59 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/19 60 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/19 61 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/19 62 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/20 63 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/20 64 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/20 65 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/21 66 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/21 67 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/21 68 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/22 69 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/22 70 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/22 71 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/23 72 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/23 73 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/23 74 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.02 events/0 75 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/1 76 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/2 77 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/3 78 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/4 79 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/5 80 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/6 81 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/7 82 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/8 83 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/9 84 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/10 85 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/11 86 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 events/12 87 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/13 88 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/14 89 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/15 90 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/16 91 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/17 92 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/18 93 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/19 94 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/20 95 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/21 96 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/22 97 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 events/23 98 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 khelper 615 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kthread 643 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/0 644 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/1 645 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/2 646 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/3 647 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/4 648 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/5 649 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/6 650 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/7 651 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/8 652 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/9 653 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/10 654 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/11 655 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/12 656 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/13 657 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/14 658 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/15 659 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/16 660 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/17 661 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/18 662 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/19 663 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/20 664 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/21 665 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/22 666 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kblockd/23 667 root 17 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kacpid 840 root 17 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/0 841 root 18 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/1 842 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/2 843 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/3 844 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/4 845 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/5 846 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/6 847 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/7 848 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/8 849 root 13 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/9 850 root 13 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/10 851 root 13 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/11 852 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/12 853 root 16 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/13 854 root 17 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/14 855 root 18 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/15 856 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/16 857 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/17 858 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/18 859 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/19 860 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/20 861 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/21 862 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/22 863 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 cqueue/23 866 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 khubd 868 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kseriod 1118 root 23 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 pdflush 1119 root 15 0 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.11 pdflush 1120 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kswapd0 1121 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kswapd1 1122 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/0 1123 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/1 1124 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/2 1125 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/3 1126 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/4 1127 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/5 1128 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/6 1129 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/7 1130 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/8 1131 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/9 1132 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/10 1133 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/11 1134 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/12 1135 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/13 1136 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/14 1137 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/15 1138 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/16 1139 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/17 1140 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/18 1141 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/19 1142 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/20 1143 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/21 1144 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/22 1145 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 aio/23 1308 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kpsmoused 1566 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/0 1567 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.27 ata/1 1568 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:02.39 ata/2 1569 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.07 ata/3 1570 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.72 ata/4 1571 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/5 1572 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.15 ata/6 1573 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.07 ata/7 1574 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.06 ata/8 1575 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/9 1576 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/10 1577 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/11 1578 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/12 1579 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.14 ata/13 1580 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:01.56 ata/14 1581 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.04 ata/15 1582 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.40 ata/16 1583 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/17 1584 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.11 ata/18 1585 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.03 ata/19 1586 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.02 ata/20 1587 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/21 1588 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/22 1589 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata/23 1590 root 13 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ata_aux 1616 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:17.20 scsi_eh_0 1617 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_eh_1 1668 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_eh_2 1669 root 0 -20 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 qla2xxx_2_dpc 1670 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_wq_2 1671 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 fc_wq_2 1672 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 fc_dl_2 1673 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_eh_3 1674 root 0 -20 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 qla2xxx_3_dpc 1675 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 scsi_wq_3 1676 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 fc_wq_3 1677 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 fc_dl_3 1728 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kstriped 1829 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 1:09.14 kjournald 1857 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kauditd 1891 root 11 -4 13008 1188 388 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.40 udevd 4555 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/0 4556 root 13 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/1 4557 root 13 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/2 4558 root 14 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/3 4559 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/4 4560 root 16 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/5 4561 root 16 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/6 4562 root 17 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/7 4563 root 18 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/8 4564 root 19 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/9 4565 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/10 4566 root 20 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/11 4567 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/12 4568 root 13 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/13 4569 root 13 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/14 4570 root 13 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/15 4571 root 14 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/16 4572 root 14 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/17 4573 root 14 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/18 4574 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/19 4575 root 16 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/20 4576 root 15 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/21 4577 root 16 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/22 4578 root 16 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpathd/23 4579 root 18 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kmpath_handlerd 4734 root 13 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kjournald 4736 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:04.82 kjournald 4744 root 13 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 kjournald 5238 root RT 0 87584 3648 2768 S 0.0 0.0 0:03.60 multipathd 5537 root 11 -4 27328 812 580 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.14 auditd 5539 root 7 -8 81804 768 616 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.04 audispd 5564 root 15 0 5904 632 512 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.10 syslogd 5567 root 15 0 3800 432 344 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 klogd 5579 root 18 0 10728 384 244 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.42 irqbalance 5592 rpc 18 0 8048 584 464 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 portmap 5625 root 18 0 11032 768 632 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpc.statd 5681 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpciod/0 5682 root 11 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpciod/1 5683 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpciod/2 5684 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpciod/3 5685 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpciod/4 5686 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpciod/5 5687 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpciod/6 5688 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpciod/7 5689 root 10 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpciod/8 5690 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpciod/9 5691 root 12 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpciod/10 5692 root 13 -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 rpciod/11

    Read the article

  • Cleaning up temp files in OSX

    - by deddebme
    I was a Windows person for more than 10 years. Around 4 months ago, I switched to Mac, and I have never looked back. But there is one thing that bothers me, which is my Mac partition volume is losing space slowly and gradually. I am pretty sure there are a lot of orphaned temporary files laying around in the volume. I know where to find the obsoleted temp files in my Windows partition, how about in Mac OSX?

    Read the article

  • How to grow from single server setup

    - by Jenkz
    I'm looking for resources on how to grow our server setup. We currently have one dedicated server with Rackspace in the UK of the following spec: HPDL385_G2_PrevGen HP Single Dual Core Opteron 2214 (2.2Ghz) 4GB RAM 2x 10,000 SCSI Drives in RAID 1 Our traffic is up to 550,000 UVs per month. The site runs off a PHP and MySQL setup. The database gets an absolute hammering, we have many complex queries joining multilpe tables. We are using APC for PHP caching. I'm getting to the stage where I've done as much DB and query optimisation as I can and wonder what the next step should be...... I've looked at memcache, but I've got the impression that his requires a large amount of RAM and ideally a dedicated box.... So is the next step to have two boxes; one for database, one for Apache? Or is there a step I've overlooked. Our load is usually around the 2 mark, but right now it's up at 20!

    Read the article

  • How to grow from single server setup

    - by Jenkz
    I'm looking for resources on how to grow our server setup. We currently have one dedicated server with Rackspace in the UK of the following spec: HPDL385_G2_PrevGen HP Single Dual Core Opteron 2214 (2.2Ghz) 4GB RAM 2x 10,000 SCSI Drives in RAID 1 Our traffic is up to 550,000 UVs per month. The site runs off a PHP and MySQL setup. The database gets an absolute hammering, we have many complex queries joining multilpe tables. We are using APC for PHP caching. I'm getting to the stage where I've done as much DB and query optimisation as I can and wonder what the next step should be...... I've looked at memcache, but I've got the impression that his requires a large amount of RAM and ideally a dedicated box.... So is the next step to have two boxes; one for database, one for Apache? Or is there a step I've overlooked. Our load is usually around the 2 mark, but right now it's up at 20!

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu server very slow out of the blue sky (Rails, passenger, nginx)

    - by snitko
    I run Ubuntu server 8.04 on Linode with multiple Rails apps under Passenger + nginx. Today I've noticed it takes quite a lot of time to load a page (5-10 secs). And it's not only websites, ssh seems to be affected too. Having no clue why this may be happening, I started to check different things. I checked how the log files are rotated, I checked if there's enough free disk space and memory. I also checked IO rate, here's the output: $ iostat avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle 0.17 0.00 0.02 0.57 0.16 99.07 Device: tps Blk_read/s Blk_wrtn/s Blk_read Blk_wrtn xvda 2.25 39.50 16.08 147042 59856 xvdb 0.00 0.05 0.00 192 0 xvdc 2.20 25.93 24.93 96530 92808 xvdd 0.01 0.12 0.00 434 16 xvde 0.04 0.23 0.35 858 1304 xvdf 0.37 0.31 4.12 1162 15352 Rebooting didn't help either. Any ideas where should I be looking?

    Read the article

  • PostgreSQL lots of large Arrays and Writes

    - by strife911
    Hi, I am running a python program that spawns 8 threads and as each thread launch its own postmaster process via psycopg2. This is to maximize the use of my CPU-cores (8). Each thread call a series of SQL Functions. Most of these functions go through many thousands of rows each associated to a large FLOAT8[] Array (250-300) values by using unnest() and multiplying each FLOAT8 by an another FLOAT8 associated to each row. This Array approach minimized the size of the Indexes and the Tables. The Function ends with an Insert into another Table of a row of the same form (pk INT4, array FLOAT8[]). Some SQL Functions called by python will Update a row of these kind of Tables (with large Arrays). Now I currently have configured PostgreSQL to use most of the memory for cache (effective_cache_size of 57 GB I think) and only a small amount of it for shared memory (1GB I think). First, I was wondering what the difference between Cache and Shared memory was in regards to PostgreSQL (and my application). What I have noticed is that only about 20-40% of my total CPU processing power is used during the most Read intensive parts of the application (Select unnest(array) etc). So secondly, I was wondering what I could do to improve this so that 100% of the CPU is used. Based on my observations, it does not seem to have anything to do with python or its GIL. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Windows 7 Slowness following Virtual PC and Visual Studio Install

    - by Elliot Hughes
    I'm running Windows 7 32bit on a 3.2ghz Pentium D with 2gb RAM and a 1TB SATA hard drive. My system was running as fast as it ever has until I installed Visual Studio and Virtual PC a few days ago. Ever since - regardless of whether either application has been running the system has been running incredibly slowly. For example flash video plays jumpily, 3D games that used to run fine are now unplayable and even the smallest amount of multitasking makes the system unusable. I'm confident there is no virus or other such things present following scans in safemode and I'm fairly confident I've made no other changes to my system. Any ideas - I've run out of things to try!

    Read the article

  • please explain my fio results - is O_SYNC|O_DIRECT misbehaving on linux?

    - by Zoltan
    I'm going mad over figuring out what the problem could be with one of our storage boxes. With a simple fio script I'm testing random writes using bs=1M and direct=1. The SSD is a Samsung 840pro attached to an LSI HBA (3Gbit/s ports). This is the result I'm getting under FreeBSD 9.1: WRITE: io=13169MB, aggrb=224743KB/s, minb=224743KB/s, maxb=224743KB/s, mint=60002msec, maxt=60002msec This is regardless of sync being set to 0 or 1. On linux, this is the result with sync=0: WRITE: io=14828MB, aggrb=253060KB/s, minb=253060KB/s, maxb=253060KB/s, mint=60001msec, maxt=60001msec and with sync=1: WRITE: io=6360.0MB, aggrb=108542KB/s, minb=108542KB/s, maxb=108542KB/s, mint=60001msec, maxt=60001msec My understanding is that since I'm operating on the raw block device, O_SYNC should not make any difference - there's no filesystem, any barrier, anything between the writes and the drive itself. Especially with O_DIRECT|O_SYNC set. Any ideas? For reference, here's the fio script I'm testing with: [global] bs=1M ioengine=sync iodepth=4 size=16g direct=1 runtime=60 filename=/dev/sdh sync=1 [rand-write] rw=randwrite stonewall

    Read the article

  • How does the LeftHand SAN perform in a Production environment?

    - by Keith Sirmons
    Howdy, I previously asked this ServerFault question: Does anyone have experience with lefthands VSA SAN The general consensus looks like it does not perform well enough for a production SQL server even at a light load. So the new question is, How does LeftHand's SAN perform on the HP or Dell dedicated Hardware boxes? We are looking at the Starter SAN with 2 HP nodes in a 2-way replication, 2 ESX servers hosting a total of 2 Active Directory server, 1 MS SQL server, 1 File Server, and 1 General Purpose Server for things like Virus Scan (All Microsoft Server 2005 or 2008). The reason I am looking at LeftHand is for the complete software package. I plan to have a DR site and like how the SAN can perform an Async Replication to the offsite location without having to go back to the Vendor for more licenses. I also like the redundancy built into the Network Raid architecture. I have looked at other SANS and found different faults with them. For example, Dell's EqualLogic: Found that although the individual box is very redundant in hardware, the Data once spanned across multiple boxes is not redundant, if a node goes down you have lost the only copy of the data sitting on that hardware (One thing is certain, all hardware fails... When? is the only question.). I have used an XioTech SAN as well.. Well worth the money BTW, but I think it is overkill for the size of the office I am targeting. The cost to get the hardware redundancy in the XioTech makes it a little out of reach for the budget I am working in. Thank you, Keith

    Read the article

  • What things should I run daily, weekly, monthly on my Windows machine?

    - by Jitendra vyas
    What things should I run daily, weekly, monthly on my Windows XP machine? De fragmentation Scan-disk Full system scan Disk clean up Trojan checker malware remover or any other thing... And should I run all these things in Safe-mode always? I want to perform all mentioned things automatically at night. How to set schedule and What would be the best plan? For daily weekly and monthly? I've 300 GB SATA HDD with 6 partition. I would like to know in above mentioned list: Which process should I run daily? Which process should I run weekly? Which process should I run on monthly basis How to set schedule for all in Windows task scheduler?

    Read the article

  • Firebird database corruption causes

    - by Rytis
    I am running several different Firebird versions (2.0, 2.1) on multiple entry level Windows-based servers with wildly varying hardware. The only matching thing between them is that they are running same home built application with the same database structure. Lately I've been seeing massive slowdowns on multiple servers. Turns out that database gets corrupted, so each time it breaks, I get to mend, backup and restore the database, and it all is fine for some time (1-2 weeks), and then it repeats once again. Thankfully, I haven't seen any data loss or damage... yet. The thing is that every such downtime results in lost productivity, and often quite some driving for me as some of the databases are in remote locations. I've been trying to find out what's causing the corruption, but I haven't been able to. The fact that it's running on different hardware hints that it should not be a hardware based problem. If we rule out hardware issues, I have a bad feeling that it's a bug in Firebird as I'm not doing anything fancy via SQL. Do you have any idea how to find out exactly what's causing the corruption and hopefully fix the problem?

    Read the article

  • Strategies for very fast delivery of webpages.

    - by Cherian
    I run a website Cucumbertown with an initial pay load of nearly 9KB zipped. All my js is delayed loaded with requirejs and modernizer is the only exception. Now all my webpages are Nginx cached and only 10-15% hits go to the backend proxy. And the cache is invalidated by logged in users as proxy_cache_bypass. So for an anonymous user its nearly always a cache hit. I have some basic OS tuning with default via ip dev eth0 initcwnd 15 net.ipv4.tcp_slow_start_after_idle 0 Despite an all cache & large initcwnd my pages still take 2.5 – 3 seconds. I have a yslow score of And page speed at Are there strategies that can help deliver webpages even faster than this? Deliver pages at 1+ second time for 10KB payload? Notes: My servers run of a fairly good data center from Linode at Fremont.

    Read the article

  • Better way to design a database

    - by cMinor
    I have a conceptual problem and I would like to get your ideas on how I'll be able to do what I am aiming. My goal is to create a database with information of persons who work at a place depending on their profession and skills,and keep control of salary and projects (how much would cost summing all the hours of work) I have 3 categories which can have subcategories: Outsourcing Technician welder turner assistant Administrative supervisor manager So each person has its information and the projects they are working on, also one person may do several jobs... I was thinking about having 5 tables (EMPLOYEE, SKILLS, PROYECTS, SALARY, PROFESSION) but I guess there is a better way of doing this. create table Employee ( PRIMARY KEY [Person_ID] int(10), [Name] varchar(30), [sex] varchar(10), [address] varchar(10), [profession] varchar(10), [Skills_ID] int(10), [Proyect_ID] int(10), [Salary_ID] int(10), [Salary] float ) create table Skills ( PRIMARY KEY [Skills_ID] int(10), FOREIGN KEY [Skills_name] varchar(10) REFERENCES Employee(Person_ID), [Skills_pay] float(10), [Comments] varchar(50) ) create table Proyects ( PRIMARY KEY [Proyect_ID] int(10), FOREIGN KEY [Skills_name] varchar(10) REFERENCES Employee(Person_ID) [Proyect_name] varchar(10), [working_Hours] float(10), [Comments] varchar(50) ) create table Salary ( PRIMARY KEY [Salary_ID] int(10), FOREIGN KEY [Skills_name] varchar(10) REFERENCES Employee(Person_ID) [Proyect_name] varchar(10), [working_Hours] float(10), [Comments] varchar(50) ) So to get the total amount of the cost of a project I would just sum the working hours of each employee envolved and sum some extra costs in an aggregate query. Is there a way to do this in a more efficient way? What to add or delete of this small model? I guess I am missing something in the salary - maybe I need another table for that?

    Read the article

  • Why the huge difference between etch and lenny MySQL

    - by rmarimon
    I've been working on a program for the last year. The development environment is working with a database in MySQL running on debian etch version mysql Ver 14.12 Distrib 5.0.32, for pc-linux-gnu (i486) using readline 5.2. The production environment is working on debian lenny with version mysql Ver 14.12 Distrib 5.0.51a, for debian-linux-gnu (i486) using readline 5.2. I was just timing some database access and what takes in the development environment 150 seconds, takes 300 in the production environment. I checked the /etc/mysql/my.cnf files on both systems and the only differences are # development bind-address = 10.168.1.82 log_bin = /var/log/mysql/mysql-bin.log # production bind-address = 127.0.0.1 myisam-recover = BACKUP #log_bin = /var/log/mysql/mysql-bin.log I dump a database from the production and load it into the development and with the same server everything takes half the time !!! What should I check?

    Read the article

  • Will a database server perform better running on 2 CPUs with 16 cores or 4 CPUs with 8 cores?

    - by AlexOdin
    What I have: an online financial application (ASP.NET, C#) at peak we have 5K+ simultaneous users backend is running on Oracle 11g (active server + stand-by using Active Data Guard). At peak - 4K-5K database sessions Oracle is installed on Linux 5.8 (Oracle's unbreakable version) the database size: 7TB disk storage: NetApp (connected with 10GB network) I would like to replace old servers (IT will purchase HP blades BL685C). Servers will have 256GB of RAM. I need your help to figure out what to do with CPUs and cores. Options: 2 CPUs (2.3 GHz) with 16 cores each 4 CPUs (3.0 GHz) with 8 cores each Question: Which one should I pick? P.S. Next year, we will migrate from Oracle to SQL server. I hope, whatever option you recommend will work for both platforms

    Read the article

  • Partial-stroking / Short-stroking / Half-stroking Hard Drives?

    - by Daniel Magliola
    Could anyone here explain to me what is implied by this term? (I've seen the same thing mentioned with the 3 terms). At first when I read about it, for some reason I understood that it was some way of splitting the bytes across the platters of the disk, which sounded like a good idea and obviously doesn't make sense, because that wouldn't cut disk size in half (and disk are probably already splitting bytes across platters)... The best I've come to understand is that basically instead of creating one partition for the whole size of the disk, you create 2 partitions, and use only one of them, either the one in the "center" or the one in the "rim" of the platters, and since one of the two is faster (people didn't seem to agree on which one was faster), that makes everything better. Am I understanding this correctly? Has anyone tried this with their drives and had a good outcome? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Slow INFORMATION_SCHEMA query

    - by Thomas
    We have a .NET Windows application that runs the following query on login to get some information about the database: SELECT t.TABLE_NAME, ISNULL(pk_ccu.COLUMN_NAME,'') PK, ISNULL(fk_ccu.COLUMN_NAME,'') FK FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES t LEFT JOIN INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS pk_tc ON pk_tc.TABLE_NAME = t.TABLE_NAME AND pk_tc.CONSTRAINT_TYPE = 'PRIMARY KEY' LEFT JOIN INFORMATION_SCHEMA.CONSTRAINT_COLUMN_USAGE pk_ccu ON pk_ccu.CONSTRAINT_NAME = pk_tc.CONSTRAINT_NAME LEFT JOIN INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLE_CONSTRAINTS fk_tc ON fk_tc.TABLE_NAME = t.TABLE_NAME AND fk_tc.CONSTRAINT_TYPE = 'FOREIGN KEY' LEFT JOIN INFORMATION_SCHEMA.CONSTRAINT_COLUMN_USAGE fk_ccu ON fk_ccu.CONSTRAINT_NAME = fk_tc.CONSTRAINT_NAME Usually this runs in a couple seconds, but on one server running SQL Server 2000, it is taking over four minutes to run. I ran it with the execution plan enabled, and the results are huge, but this part caught my eye (it won't let me post an image): http://img35.imageshack.us/i/plank.png/ I then updated the statistics on all of the tables that were mentioned in the execution plan: update statistics sysobjects update statistics syscolumns update statistics systypes update statistics master..spt_values update statistics sysreferences But that didn't help. The index tuning wizard doesn't help either, because it doesn't let me select system tables. There is nothing else running on this server, so nothing else could be slowing it down. What else can I do to diagnose or fix the problem on that server?

    Read the article

  • Server freeze (Disk I/O possibly)

    - by user973917
    I have a Windows Server 2008 machine that is resyncing disks after a powerloss. The issue is that the system becomes unresponsive after about 10 minutes. We've checked with resource monitor and found that the CPU's aren't maxed; but the disk I/O is well over 250MB/s. We've attempted copying data from 1 disk to another; bypassing syncing of disks and this too causes the machine to freeze after about 10 minutes of copying data. I have attempted to let the machine resync the disks for a few days with the machine on in this "frozen" state. By frozen I mean that NOTHING works on the machine, it's completely unresponsive; no mouse movement, etc. I want to know how I would go about definitively checking if this is Disk I/O that is freezing the system. I know that disk I/O can freeze a system; but what can I use to run tests to be sure?

    Read the article

  • Processor speeds on my machine don't live up to manufacturer hype

    - by atch
    Why am I not seeing the promised speed claims of processor manufacturers on my computer? Producers of processors claim that their product can perform so many thousands (or millions) of operations per second. And yet on my machine (4GB, 3500hz), the typical program (Word, Visual Studio etc.) takes at least 10 seconds to start. I've formatted my hard drive and ticked all the necessary boxes to optimize my machine and yet I'm not seeing the promised speeds. Say it takes Outlook ten seconds to load. How many millions of operations does it really go through in order to start up?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118  | Next Page >