Search Results

Search found 48847 results on 1954 pages for 'class attribute'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 119/1954 | < Previous Page | 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126  | Next Page >

  • django access to parent

    - by SledgehammerPL
    model: class Product(models.Model): name = models.CharField(max_length = 128) (...) def __unicode__(self): return self.name class Receipt(models.Model): name = models.CharField(max_length=128) (...) components = models.ManyToManyField(Product, through='ReceiptComponent') def __unicode__(self): return self.name class ReceiptComponent(models.Model): product = models.ForeignKey(Product) receipt = models.ForeignKey(Receipt) quantity = models.FloatField(max_length=9) unit = models.ForeignKey(Unit) def __unicode__(self): return unicode(self.quantity!=0 and self.quantity or '') + ' ' + unicode(self.unit) + ' ' + self.product.genitive And now I'd like to get list of the most often useable products: ReceiptComponent.objects.values('product').annotate(Count('product')).order_by('-product__count' the example result: [{'product': 3, 'product__count': 5}, {'product': 6, 'product__count': 4}, {'product': 5, 'product__count': 3}, {'product': 7, 'product__count': 2}, {'product': 1, 'product__count': 2}, {'product': 11, 'product__count': 1}, {'product': 8, 'product__count': 1}, {'product': 4, 'product__count': 1}, {'product': 9, 'product__count': 1}] It's almost what I need. But I'd prefer having Product object not product value, because I'd like to use this in views.py for generating list.

    Read the article

  • Can a WPF base class contain a control for a derived class?

    - by Number8
    Hello, I have several UserControls that have some of the same controls doing the same job. Is it possible to extract those controls into a base class? When I have tried it, I get an error that the definition in the generated .g.cs file will hide the parent def. What I would like to do: public class ctlBase : UserControl { internal CheckBox chkBox { get; set; } } In the .xaml of the derived class: <Grid> <CheckBox x:Name="chkBox" /> </Grid> public class DerivedCtl : ctlBase { } Thanks for any insights...

    Read the article

  • Objective C: Class Extensions and Protocol Conformation Warnings

    - by Ben Reeves
    I have a large class, which I have divided into several different class extension files for readability. @protocol MyProtocol @required -(void)required; @end @interface MyClass : NSObject <MyProtocol> @end @interface MyClass (RequiredExtension) -(void)required; @end Is there a better way to do this, without the compiler warning? warning: class 'MyClass' does not fully implement the 'MyProtocol' protocol

    Read the article

  • Initializing static pointer in templated class.

    - by Anthony
    This is difficult for me to formulate in a Google query (at least one that gives me what I'm looking for) so I've had some trouble finding an answer. I'm sure I'm not the first to ask though. Consider a class like so: template < class T > class MyClass { private: static T staticObject; static T * staticPointerObject; }; ... template < class T > T MyClass<T>::staticObject; // <-- works ... template < class T > T * MyClass<T>::staticPointerObject = NULL; // <-- cannot find symbol staticPointerObject. I am having trouble figuring out why I cannot successfully create that pointer object. Edit: The above code is all specified in the header, and the issue I mentioned is an error in the link step, so it is not finding the specific symbol.

    Read the article

  • Caught AttributeError while rendering: 'str' object has no attribute '_meta'

    - by D_D
    def broadcast_display_and_form(request): if request.method == 'POST' : form = PostForm(request.POST) if form.is_valid(): post = form.cleaned_data['post'] obj = form.save(commit=False) obj.person = request.user obj.post = post obj.save() readers = User.objects.all() for x in readers: read_obj = BroadcastReader(person = x) read_obj.post = obj read_obj.save() return HttpResponseRedirect('/broadcast') else : form = PostForm() posts = BroadcastReader.objects.filter(person = request.user) return render_to_response('broadcast/index.html', { 'form' : form , 'posts' : posts ,} ) My template: {% extends "base.html" %} {% load comments %} {% block content %} <form action='.' method='POST'> {{ form.as_p }} <p> <input type="submit" value ="send it" /></input> </p> </form> {% get_comment_count for posts.post as comment_count %} {% render_comment_list for posts.post %} {% for x in posts %} <p> {{ x.post.person }} - {{ x.post.post }} </p> {% endfor %} {% endblock %}

    Read the article

  • Invisible class from WebService in application

    - by phenevo
    I've got webservice which has multiple classess My winforms application see theirs, but not everyone. This application has webreference to this webservice. I think that this application see every class which is used in WebMethod, but I using parent class in WebMethod and I wanna casting it to another class,which is not used at webmethod.

    Read the article

  • Why can i not rewrite parent class?

    - by latvian
    I want to rewrite core/adminthtml/block/widget/tabs.php class which is a super class for core/adminhtml/block/sales/order/view/tabs.php class. Here is config code for both scenarios: <blocks> <adminhtml> <rewrite> <sales_order_view_tabs>Jimmy_SalesAffil_Block_Widget_Tabs</sales_order_view_tabs> <widget_tabs>Jimmy_SalesAffil_Block_Widget_Tabs</widget_tabs> ..... </rewrite> </adminhtml> </blocks> While I am able to rewrite ...view/tabs.php, I am not able to rewrite the super class. Why? Is it possible? How?

    Read the article

  • Passing a Smarty variable into Javascript link "src" attribute

    - by mikemick
    I've assigned a Smarty variable: {assign var="siteurl" value="http://website.com"} I can successfully use it in my header.html file to call a CSS link: <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="{$siteurl}/style.css" /> displays <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="http://website.com/style.css" /> However, when I do the same for a Javascript source, it literally prints out "{$siteurl}": <script type="text/javascript" src="{$siteurl}/scripts.js"></script> displays <script type="text/javascript" src="{$siteurl}/scripts.js"></script> Why isn't this Smarty variable displaying as expected?

    Read the article

  • R get rid of rows with duplicate attribute

    - by CatholicEvangelist
    hi there I have a big dataframe with columns such as: ID, time, OS, IP Each row of that dataframe corresponds to one entry. Within that dataframe for some IDs serveral entries (rows) exist. I would like to get rid of those multiple rows (obviously the other attributes will differ for the same ID). Or put different: I only want one single entry (row) for each ID. Could anyone be so kind and help me out on this one? When I use unique, on the ID column, I only recieve the levels (or each unique ID), but I want to keep the other attributes as well... I have tried to use apply(x,2,unique(data$ID)), but this does not work either... Any help is highly appreciated!

    Read the article

  • Using HTML::Template within a value attribute

    - by Zerobu
    Hello, my question is how would I use an HTML::Template tag inside a value of form to change that form. For example <table border="0" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="1"> <tr> <td align="right">File:</td> <td> <input type="file" name="upload" value= style="width:400px"> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right">File Name:</td> <td> <input type="text" name="filename" style="width:400px" value="" > </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right">Title:</td> <td> <input type="text" name="title" style="width:400px" value="" /> </td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right">Date:</td> <td> <input type="text" name="date" style="width:400px" value="" /> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" align="right"> <input type="button" value="Cancel"> <input type="submit" name="action" value="Upload" /> </td> </tr> </table> I want the value to have a variable in it.

    Read the article

  • Passing a enum value as a tag attribute in JSP

    - by Jakub
    I have a custom JSP tag which is using a parameter which is an enum. This approach is a consequence of using other classes which need this enumeration. The point is I have no clue how to assign an enum value in the EL: <mytaglib:mytag enumParam="${now what do I type here?}" /> The only workaround which I found so far was to make the enumParam an Integer and convert it to desired values: <mytaglib:mytag enumParam="3" /> I believe there must be a better way to do it. Please help.

    Read the article

  • Constructor/Destructor involving a class and a struct

    - by Bogdan Maier
    I am working on a program and need to make an array of objects, specifically I have a 31x1 array where each position is an object, (each object is basically built out of 6 ints). Here is what I have but something is wrong and i could use some help thank you. 31x1 struct header" const int days=31; struct Arr{ int days; int *M; }; typedef Arr* Array; 31x1 matrix constructor: void constr(){ int *M; M = new Expe[31]; // Expe is the class class header: class Expe { private: //0-HouseKeeping, 1-Food, 2-Transport, 3-Clothing, 4-TelNet, 5-others int *obj; } Class object constructor: Expe::Expe() { this->obj=new int[6]; } help please... because i`m pretty lost.

    Read the article

  • Batch Create Java Class Stubs

    - by user344639
    Given a list of potential class names: 1. Alaska . . . 50. Wyoming Is there a tool that will create empty java class files for each with supplied parameters? I'm thinking of something like the "New...Class" dialog in Eclipse, only on steriods. :-) Thanks in advance, Kyle

    Read the article

  • Scala: getting the name of the class the trait is mixed in

    - by Alexey Romanov
    Given an instance of a class, we can obviously return its name: trait MixedInClassDiscovery { val className = this.getClass.getName } class AClass extends MixedInClassDiscovery { ... this.className // returns "AClass" ... } But this way uses reflection, once for every instance of AClass. Can the same be done once for every class, instead? One solution which comes to mind is to mix it into companion objects instead of classes themselves.

    Read the article

  • default model field attribute in Django

    - by Rosarch
    I have a Django model: @staticmethod def getdefault(): print "getdefault called" return cPickle.dumps(set()) _applies_to = models.TextField(db_index=True, default=getdefault) For some reason, getdefault() is never called, even as I construct instances of this model and save them to the database. This seems to contradict the Django documentation: Field.default The default value for the field. This can be a value or a callable object. If callable it will be called every time a new object is created. Am I doing something wrong? Update: Originally, I had this, but then I switched to the above version to debug: _applies_to = models.TextField(db_index=True, default=cPickle.dumps(set())) I'm not sure why that wouldn't work.

    Read the article

  • Create attribute in existing XML

    - by user560411
    Hello. I have the following php code that inserts data into XML and works correctly. However, I want to add an ID number like below <CD id="xxxx"> My question is how can i add an ID into CD for this to work ? I use form to parse the id. ** the main code ** <?php $CD = array( 'TITLE' => $_POST['title'], 'BAND' => $_POST['band'], 'YEAR' => $_POST['year'], ); $doc = new DOMDocument(); $doc->load( 'insert.xml' ); $doc->formatOutput = true; $r = $doc->getElementsByTagName("CATEGORIES")->item(0); $b = $doc->createElement("CD"); $TITLE = $doc->createElement("TITLE"); $TITLE->appendChild( $doc->createTextNode( $CD["TITLE"] ) ); $b->appendChild( $TITLE ); $BAND = $doc->createElement("BAND"); $BAND->appendChild( $doc->createTextNode( $CD["BAND"] ) ); $b->appendChild( $BAND ); $YEAR = $doc->createElement("YEAR"); $YEAR->appendChild( $doc->createTextNode( $CD["YEAR"] ) ); $b->appendChild( $YEAR ); $r->appendChild( $b ); $doc->save("insert.xml"); ?> the XML file <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <MY_CD> <CATEGORIES> <CD> <TITLE>NEVER MIND THE BOLLOCKS</TITLE> <BAND>SEX PISTOLS</BAND> <YEAR>1977</YEAR> </CD> <CD> <TITLE>NEVERMIND</TITLE> <BAND>NIRVANA</BAND> <YEAR>1991</YEAR> </CD> </CATEGORIES> </MY_CD>

    Read the article

  • Class in TR without one TD

    - by Roy Grendester
    <table> <tr class="here"><td><input type="text" readonly=readonly></td></tr> <tr class="here"><td><input type="text" readonly=readonly></td></tr> <tr class="here"><td><input type="text" ></td></tr> </table> td { padding: 15px; margin: 10px; } .here { background-color: red; } http://jsfiddle.net/dZYEM/ How can i modify class .here that this working where child input has attribute readonly? I dont want modify html. EDIT: now i have: jsfiddle.net/dZYEM/2/ i would like receive: http://jsfiddle.net/dZYEM/3/ but without use style. I want receive this only with css.

    Read the article

  • How to I reference a pointer from a different class

    - by Justagruvn
    Hey team of awesomeness!, (Iphone Objective-C question) First off, I despise singletons with a passion. Though I should probably be trying to use one, I just dont want to. I want to create a data class (that is instantiated only once by a view controller on loading), and then using a different class, message the crap out of that data instance until it is brimming with so much data, it smiles. So, how do i do that? I made a pointer to the instance of the data class when I instantiated it. I'm now over in a separate view controller, action occurs, and I want to update the initial data object. I think I need to reference that object by way of pointer, but I have no idea how to do that. yes I've set properties and getters and setters, which seem to work, but only in the initial view controller class. Peace Love applesauce.

    Read the article

  • Why is 'virtual' optional for overridden methods in derived classes?

    - by squelart
    When a method is declared as virtual in a class, its overrides in derived classes are automatically considered virtual as well, and the C++ language makes this keyword virtual optional in this case: class Base { virtual void f(); }; class Derived : public Base { void f(); // 'virtual' is optional but implied. }; My question is: What is the rationale for making virtual optional? I know that it is not absolutely necessary for the compiler to be told that, but I would think that developers would benefit if such a constraint was enforced by the compiler. E.g., sometimes when I read others' code I wonder if a method is virtual and I have to track down its superclasses to determine that. And some coding standards (Google) make it a 'must' to put the virtual keyword in all subclasses.

    Read the article

  • how to save class object in registry?

    - by younevertell
    Basically I have some class objects, each with three properties. Once one class object is selected in the ComboBox, the corresponding properties shows on three textboxs. I am trying to add one save button. I can change the value of the properties. Once the save button is clicked, all the class ojects with three corresponding properties are saved in the registry. Save setting for later use It seems Registing tryKey.SetValue Method can not save an object directly?

    Read the article

  • class method as hash value

    - by demas
    I have this working code: class Server def handle(&block) @block = block end def do @block.call end end class Client def initialize @server = Server.new @server.handle { action } end def action puts "some" end def call_server @server.do end end client = Client.new client.call_server My Server will handle more then one action so I want to change code such way: class Server def handle(options) @block = options[:on_filter] end def do @block.call end end class Client def initialize @server = Server.new my_hash = { :on_filter => action } @server.handle(my_hash) end def action puts "some" end def call_server @server.do end end client = Client.new client.call_server It is incorrect code because action() method calls on create my_hash, but if I try to modify code to: my_hash = { :on_filter => { action } } i get error message. Is it possible to create hash with methods as hash values ?

    Read the article

  • Can C# make my class look like another class?

    - by Vaccano
    I have a class that look like this: public class BasePadWI { public WorkItem WorkItemReference { get; set; } .... Other stuff ...... } I then have a dictionary that is defined like this: public Dictionary<BasePadWI, Canvas> Pad { get; set; } I would then like to make a call like this: List<WorkItem> workItems = Pad.Keys.ToList(); (Note: WorkItem is a sealed class, so I cannot inherit.) Is there some trickery that I could do in the class to make it look like a WorkItem? I have done this in the mean time: List<WorkItem> workItems = Pad.Keys.ToList().ConvertAll(x=>x.WorkItem);

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126  | Next Page >