Search Results

Search found 5842 results on 234 pages for 'compiler warnings'.

Page 119/234 | < Previous Page | 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126  | Next Page >

  • doxygen with IDL/ODL

    - by John
    If you have a C++ project that has a bunch of .ODL files and the generated .h files from the ODL compiler, should doxygen be told to parse both .odl and .h, or only one or the other? In general I don't like documenting generated code but IDL is sort of a special case. In any case, it seems like the member listing of ODL files is not quite working properly in my tests, are ODL files properly parsed?

    Read the article

  • What is DEFAULT_CC in function declaration?

    - by humoeba
    I'm relatively new to C, and am curious what this syntax means in a function declaration: int DEFAULT_CC foo(void) where DEFAULT_CC is probably defined somewhere else as: #define DEFAULT_CC "cc" Is this a direction to use a certain compiler or something?

    Read the article

  • Declare a Dictionary inside a static class

    - by Ngu Soon Hui
    How to declare a static dictionary object inside a static class? I tried public static class ErrorCode { public const IDictionary<string , string > ErrorCodeDic =new Dictionary<string, string>() { {"1","User name or password problem"} }; } But the compiler complains that "A const field of a reference type other than string can only be initialized with null".

    Read the article

  • Make sure bad patterns don't come back after refactoring

    - by Let_Me_Be
    I'm refactoring an old C code. The code has absolutely no layered architecture (everything is being accessed by everything) and I'm trying to change that. I would like to cut direct access to structure members (at least write for now) and only allow access through access functions. Is there some tool (or perhaps directly the compiler) that could check this rule for me? I need this since I'm maintaining a fork and the upstream isn't very concerned with code quality.

    Read the article

  • Destructors in C++

    - by user265260
    does the Destructor deallocate memory assigned to the object which it belongs to or is it just called so that it can perform some last minute housekeeping before the object os deallocated by the compiler?

    Read the article

  • crt0.o and crt1.o -- What's the difference?

    - by Earlz
    Hello, recently I've been trying to debug some low level work and I could not find the crt0.S for the compiler(avr-gcc) but I did find a crt1.S (and the same with the corresponding .o files) What is the difference between these two files? Is crt1 something completely different or what? They both seem to have to do with something for bootstrapping(setting up stack frame and such), but why the distinction?

    Read the article

  • How do I bit shift a long by more than 32 bits?

    - by mach7
    It seems like I should be able to perform bit shift in C/C++ by more than 32 bits provided the left operand of the shift is a long. But this doesn't seem to work, at least with the g++ compiler. Example: unsigned long A = (1L << 37) gives A = 0 which isn't what I want. Am I missing something or is this just not possible? -J

    Read the article

  • sizeof float (3.0) vs (3.0f)

    - by kumar
    Hi, What is the difference between sizeof(3.0) and sizeof(3.0f) I was expecting both of them to give the same result (sizeof float)..but its different. In 32 bit machine,gcc compiler, sizeof(3.0f) =4 sizeof(3.0) = 8 Why so?

    Read the article

  • [C++] Is it possible to roll a significantly faster version of sqrt

    - by John
    In an app I'm profiling, I found that in some scenarios this functions are able to take over 10% of total execution time. I've seen discussion over the years of faster sqrt implementations using sneaky floating-point trickery, but I don't know if such things are outdated on modern CPUs. MSVC++ 2008 compiler is being used, for reference... though I'd assume sqrt is not going to add much overhead though.

    Read the article

  • [game] How is it possible to legally write ::: in C++ and ??? in C#?

    - by daveny
    These questions are a kind of game, and I did not find the solution for them. It is possible to write ::: in C++ without using quotes or anything like this and the compiler will accept it (macros are prohibited too). And the same is true for C# too, but in C#, you have to write ???. I think C++ will use the :: scope operator and C# will use ? : , but I do not know the answers to them. Any idea?

    Read the article

  • is const (c++) optional?

    - by Dr Deo
    according to some tutorials i read a while back, the "const" declaration makes a variable "constant" ie it cannot change later. But i find this const declaration abit inconveniencing since the compiler sometimes gives errors like "cannot convert const int to int" or something like that. and i find myself cheating by removing it anyway. question: assuming that i am careful about not changing a variable in my source code, can i happily forget about this const stuff? Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • What are the latest tools that I can use to write a DSL (Domain-specific language) in 2009 Sep?

    - by servicesxiaodai
    I looked into Logix and EasyExtend for Python. Logix hasn't been around for a while and it failed to install on Python 2.6. EasyExtend's tutorial is hopeless, the code in the tutorial doesn't even work. I am looking for something so I can write my DSL. My DSL will be used as a research tool. And I don't want to spend time learning all that parsing and compiler theory.

    Read the article

  • Are 'const' variables precomputed by default in C++?

    - by Gunnar
    Suppose I have variables for positions like const float latitude = 51.+11./60.+33.0461/3600.; const float longitude = 12.+50./60.+31.9369/3600.; and use them frequently in the program. Does the compiler precompute that? (This example should not produce much overhead, but you get the point.) Bonus point for pointing out location. ;) TIA

    Read the article

  • Creating an instance within the Class itself

    - by didxga
    What's going on when the assignment statement executed at Line 4, does compiler ignore the new operator and keep the foo variable being null or something else happen to handle this awkward moment? public class Foo { // creating an instance before its constructor has been invoked, suppose the "initializing" // gets printed in constructor as a result of the next line, of course it will not print it private Foo foo = new Foo();//Line 4 public Foo() { System.out.println("initializing"); } }

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126  | Next Page >