Search Results

Search found 25124 results on 1005 pages for 'install upgrade'.

Page 12/1005 | < Previous Page | 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19  | Next Page >

  • Quarterly E-Business Suite Upgrade Recommendations: October 2012 Edition

    - by Steven Chan (Oracle Development)
    I've previously published advice on the general priorities for applying EBS updates.  But what are your top priorities for major upgrades to EBS and its technology stack components? Here is a summary of our latest upgrade recommendations for E-Business Suite updates and technology stack components.  These quarterly recommendations are based upon the latest updates to Oracle's product strategies, support deadlines, and newly-certified releases.  Upgrade Recommendations for October 2012 EBS 11i users should upgrade to 12.1.3, or -- if staying on 11i -- should be on the minimum 11i patching baseline, EBS 12.0 users should upgrade to 12.1.3, or -- if staying on 12.0 -- should be on the minimum 12.0 patching baseline, EBS 12.1 users should upgrade to 12.1.3. Oracle Database 10gR2 and 11gR1 users should upgrade to 11gR2 11.2.0.3. EBS 12 users of Oracle Single Sign-On 10g users should migrate to Oracle Access Manager 11g 11.1.1.5. EBS 11i users of  Oracle Single Sign-On 10g users should migrate to Oracle Access Manager 10g 10.1.4.3. Oracle Internet Directory 10g users should upgrade to Oracle Internet Directory 11g 11.1.1.6. Oracle Discoverer users should migrate to Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition (OBIEE), Oracle Business Intelligence Applications (OBIA), or Discoverer 11g 11.1.1.6. Oracle Portal 10g users should migrate to Oracle WebCenter 11g 11.1.1.6 or upgrade to Portal 11g 11.1.1.6. All Windows desktop users should migrate from JInitiator and older Java releases to JRE 1.6.0_35 or later 1.6 updates. All Firefox users should upgrade to Firefox Extended Support Release 10. Related Articles Extended Support Fees Waived for E-Business Suite 11i and 12.0 On Database Patching and Support: A Primer for E-Business Suite Users On Apps Tier Patching and Support: A Primer for E-Business Suite Users EBS Support Information Center + Patching & Maintenance Advisor Available on My Oracle Support What's the Best Way to Patch an E-Business Suite Environment?

    Read the article

  • some files just wont install- linux-image-3.5.0-42-generic

    - by jatin
    It gives the following details of the package operation failing after using the sofware updater on 12.10: installArchives() failed: perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LANG = "en_IN.ISO8859-1" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory Preconfiguring packages ... perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LANG = "en_IN.ISO8859-1" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory Preconfiguring packages ... perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LANG = "en_IN.ISO8859-1" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory Preconfiguring packages ... perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LANG = "en_IN.ISO8859-1" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory Preconfiguring packages ... (Reading database ... (Reading database ... 217566 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace linux-image-3.5.0-36-generic 3.5.0-36.57~precise1 (using .../linux-image-3.5.0-36-generic_3.5.0-36.57_amd64.deb) ... locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory Done. Unpacking replacement linux-image-3.5.0-36-generic ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.5.0-36-generic_3.5.0-36.57_amd64.deb (--unpack): unable to make backup link of `./boot/System.map-3.5.0-36-generic' before installing new version: Operation not permitted No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d . run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools 3.5.0-36-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-36-generic run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub 3.5.0-36-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-36-generic Preparing to replace linux-image-3.5.0-42-generic 3.5.0-42.65~precise1 (using .../linux-image-3.5.0-42-generic_3.5.0-42.65_amd64.deb) ... locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory Done. Unpacking replacement linux-image-3.5.0-42-generic ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.5.0-42-generic_3.5.0-42.65_amd64.deb (--unpack): unable to make backup link of `./boot/System.map-3.5.0-42-generic' before installing new version: Operation not permitted No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d . run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools 3.5.0-42-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-42-generic dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub 3.5.0-42-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-42-generic Preparing to replace memtest86+ 4.20-1.1ubuntu1 (using .../memtest86+_4.20-1.1ubuntu2.1_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement memtest86+ ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/memtest86+_4.20-1.1ubuntu2.1_amd64.deb (--unpack): unable to make backup link of `./boot/memtest86+.bin' before installing new version: Operation not permitted No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.5.0-36-generic_3.5.0-36.57_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-3.5.0-42-generic_3.5.0-42.65_amd64.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/memtest86+_4.20-1.1ubuntu2.1_amd64.deb Error in function: Output of df -h: Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda6 38G 6.5G 30G 19% / udev 3.5G 4.0K 3.5G 1% /dev tmpfs 1.5G 924K 1.5G 1% /run none 5.0M 4.0K 5.0M 1% /run/lock none 3.6G 296K 3.6G 1% /run/shm none 100M 64K 100M 1% /run/user /dev/sda1 197M 87M 111M 44% /boot /dev/sda5 243G 971M 230G 1% /home

    Read the article

  • Comparing my version with the clean install

    - by Shomz
    I've been using and upgrading Ubuntu since the version 9. Of course, I have 13.04 now and after installing a clean 13.04 to another computer, I've noticed quite a few differences (plymouth, lightdm, some software behaves differently, etc.). I've done quite a few customizations during the period so it's probably due to that. So I wonder if there is a way to see what's different between my and the clean version. Not the complete file list diff, but perhaps software package differences (synaptic?) or something that will be easier to read and compare. Is there a way?

    Read the article

  • Upgrade Intel Xeon Prestonia to a 64-bit processor

    - by IDisposable
    In theory, could I upgrade a mPGA604-socket motherboard with a Prestonia processor to some Intel Xeon processor with 64-bit? I've got a Dell PowerEdge 1750 with dual 2.8GHz Xeon processors running my Windows Home Server machine. I want to upgrade to the upcoming Vail release, but it is 64-bit only. The processors are Prestonia-core, which is pre-64bit, but I was wondering if it was possible to swap in some pin-compatible later generation processor. According to wikipedia, the mPGA604-socket continues to be used for several later generations that do have same pinout. So, IN THEORY, could I swap in a 64-bit, like a Nocona-core?

    Read the article

  • Upgrade OpenSSL 0.9.8k to OpenSSL 1.0.1c on Ubuntu 10.04

    - by Nina
    We're currently using Ubuntu 10.04 and based on the PCI Compliance results, we're told to upgrade our OpenSSL. I attempted to do this using this reference: http://sandilands.info/sgordon/upgrade-latest-version-openssl-on-ubuntu and http://www.lunarforums.com/dedicated_web_hosting_at_lunarpages/upgrading_openssl-t35015.0.html Unfortunately, they didn't work for me. And when I attempted to remove the old version prior to installation, it looks like it broke a few thins in the system. The article from Steve Gordon seemed like it would work for me, but when I ran the openssl version command, it still read that it was the old version. I was wondering if anyone has any suggestions on what I should do. Fix: After following the steps from Steven Gordon, make sure you restart apache and / or restart your computer (I did both, but I'm sure a simple restart will fix it right up).

    Read the article

  • Register for windows Upgrade Offer from Windows 7 to Windows 8

    - by BumbleBee
    I have to register for windows Upgrade Offer from here. I purchased Dell Inspiron 5520 laptop before 2 weeks and I got windows 7 Home Basic in it. But now I want to register for windows upgrade offer, When I filled up registration form and submit then it displayed that I am not eligible for this kind of offer. I don't know why this message is displaying although I bought laptop in between eligible time period. I think, I was filling wrong details in form. Because I am not sure about what to fill in Retailer's Name, Purchase Date and PC Model. And one thing is how to find right purchase Date from my product's Service Tag ? Which date I have to fill in form, Shipping Date OR Manufacture Date? Please Provide me a right direction to register and correct information regarding Retailer'Name and Purchase Date and PC Model.

    Read the article

  • Queries related to Windows 8 Upgrade installation media

    - by Karan
    I don't expect all these questions to be answered right away. Gradually over time is fine. Also, I guess the answers would differ depending on the language, so I'm looking for information related to the English/en-US versions only (I believe there is an en-GB version as well?) The Windows 8 Upgrade Assistant allows one to create USB/DVD (ISO) media: Is the media customised per-PC in any way, or are copies created on different PCs with different base OSes (XP/Vista/7) exactly the same? If the ISOs are not customised, are they exactly the same content-wise as the Upgrade DVDs available for purchase?

    Read the article

  • F5 BigIP upgrade from 9.x to 10.x

    - by mbuk2k
    Having a few difficulties upgrading a Big IP 3400 from 9.4.8 to any version 10.x image. The following are the versions I've tried: 10.1.0.3341.0 10.2.2.763.3 10.2.3.112.0 10.2.4.577.0 To upgrade I'm running the following command: image2disk --format=volumes BIGIP-10.1.0.3341.0.iso Obviously replacing the version number with the relevant image I'm trying to upgrade to each time. The F5 reboots, and starts copying packages however after 30 seconds or so just stops copying. The cursor in the console is still flashing but no matter how long it's left, the package doesn't copy. It seems to be a different package with each version/image (but always the same package per version) at point of freezing, which I'm guessing is suggesting a space issue? I've checked free space on the device and it has over 2GB free at root which should surely be enough? If anyone has any advice or pointers, it would be kindly appreciated. Thank you

    Read the article

  • Input devices stopped working during system upgrade

    - by amorfis
    Hi, I was upgrading Ubuntu on my server (but Ubuntu is in desktop version) when mouse and keyboard stopped working :( So the screen went black (screensaver), and now I can't do anything. I don't know what stage of upgrade it stopped working, probably now it waits for me to answer some question. Keyboard and mouse were connected by KVM, connecting them directly doesn't help. Both are on USB. What I can do, is connecting to the machine by ssh. Can I somehow see and answer questions of update system and somehow finalize process of upgrade?

    Read the article

  • Is Family Tree Maker 2011 the right upgrade?

    - by bill weaver
    My father has used Family Tree Maker for years, but hasn't upgraded since version 11. It is difficult to tell from reviews at Amazon and other places whether upgrading to FTM 2011 is a good choice. File incompatibilities and upgrade woes sound like customer service is lacking, and i've read reports of it uploading your data to their database but then trying to sell you a download of data. Looking at the ancestry.com site makes me think it's solely about selling add-ons and upgrades. On the other hand, the feature set seems fairly rich and the software has a pretty strong following. I was able to get Gramps working on my system, but that's not going to work for my dad. Any advice on a good upgrade path? Doesn't necessarily have to be FTM. The only requirement is a way to import his existing data.

    Read the article

  • Apache Upgrade Version

    - by mcondiff
    I have a live server that I need to upgrade Apache from 2.2.10 to 2.2.15 on Windows Server 2003. I have just inherited this server and need the fastest way to upgrade to the latest stable version without much downtime and without messing up my configuration. My first thought is to copy the httpd.conf, uninstall the current Apache, install the latest stable Apache version and then replace the httpd.conf with the previous live version. Anyone see a problem or pitfall with that? How does a Server Pro do something like this. (I'm a programmer and am new to server systems administration).

    Read the article

  • Automate Windows 8.1 Enterprise upgrade [migrated]

    - by Ben M.
    I have been trying to find the necessary command line switches for automating the upgrade for my Windows 8 clients to Windows 8.1. I have the ISO extracted and I've run setup.exe /? but that doesn't tell me enough. I can't find any relevant information from search engines. Can anyone point me to some documentation or information on how to automate the upgrade so that it keeps user data, programs, etc? I know how to do it when running the installer manually, but I obviously do not wish to do that with 100+ machines.

    Read the article

  • Intel T5600 to upgrade T5250

    - by galets
    I want to upgrade my laptop which has T5250 CPU with a T5600 CPU to support virtualization. I ordered T5600 on ebay, but it didn't fit. It says T5250 supports PPGA478 socket, so I assume that is what I have. T5600 says supports "PBGA479, PPGA478". Since T5600 didn't fit as a replacement, I assume it means there are 2 models of T5600, one supports PBGA479, another one supports PPGA478, and not like I thought - one CPU supports both. Is that a correct statement? Does anybody know if it's even possible to do such an upgrade, or I'm wasting time?

    Read the article

  • Upgrade PHP v5.3.3 to v5.3.4

    - by Ty01
    I currently have PHP v5.3.3 installed and configured. Everything is working perfectly, but I would like to keep PHP up to date and upgrade to v5.3.4. Can someone please describe the usual upgrade process for PHP when compiling manually? For example: is it just as easy as downloading the newest source, uncompressing it, compiling it using the same (or comparable) options that were used on the last version? Is there anything that has to be removed or changed from the previous version installed? I'm clueless. Please help!

    Read the article

  • How to fix the "Unable to calculate upgrade" issue when upgrading from 12.04 to 12.10?

    - by Vagrant232
    I've been trying to upgrade to 12.10 ever since it was released today but I keep meeting this error: "An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade: E:Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. This can be caused by: * Upgrading to a pre-release version of Ubuntu * Running the current pre-release version of Ubuntu * Unofficial software packages not provided by Ubuntu" I've tried updating all the currently installed software, removing all the extra PPAs, downgrading the files installed from xorg edgers' ppa but I haven't been able to solve the problem.

    Read the article

  • apt-get install fails due to dependency issues but apt-get -f install won't fix it

    - by user71941
    I've just installed Ubuntu 12.04 and was about to manually install Rawstudio with the packages from SourceForge repo, but I've been stuck with dependency issues and I am short on apt command lines to sort this out. Here's the report I'v got : installArchives() failed: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgphoto2-2: libgphoto2-2 depends on libjpeg62; however: Package libjpeg62 is not installed. libgphoto2-l10n (2.4.13-1ubuntu1) breaks libgphoto2-2 (<= 2.4.10.1-4) and is installed. Version of libgphoto2-2 to be configured is 2.4.10.1-0ubuntu3~maverick. dpkg: error processing libgphoto2-2 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgphoto2-2-dev: libgphoto2-2-dev depends on libgphoto2-2 (= 2.4.10.1-0ubuntu3~maverick); however: Package libgphoto2-2 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libgphoto2-2-dev (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already Errors were encountered while processing: libgphoto2-2 libgphoto2-2-dev Error in function: SystemError: E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgphoto2-2: libgphoto2-2 depends on libjpeg62; however: Package libjpeg62 is not installed. libgphoto2-l10n (2.4.13-1ubuntu1) breaks libgphoto2-2 (<= 2.4.10.1-4) and is installed. Version of libgphoto2-2 to be configured is 2.4.10.1-0ubuntu3~maverick. dpkg: error processing libgphoto2-2 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgphoto2-2-dev: libgphoto2-2-dev depends on libgphoto2-2 (= 2.4.10.1-0ubuntu3~maverick); however: Package libgphoto2-2 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libgphoto2-2-dev (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured I've tried "apt-get -f install" but without success. What is the mahick command line that will unblock the situation ? Thanks Seb

    Read the article

  • yum update failed

    - by Nemanja Djuric
    I have problem doint yum update on my OpenVZ VPS i get this error message : (56/69): glibc-devel-2.5-81.el5_8.7.x86_64.rpm | 2.4 MB 00:00 (57/69): libstdc++-devel-4.1.2-52.el5_8.1.x86_64.rpm | 2.8 MB 00:00 (58/69): binutils-2.17.50.0.6-20.el5_8.3.x86_64.rpm | 2.9 MB 00:00 (59/69): cpp-4.1.2-52.el5_8.1.x86_64.rpm | 2.9 MB 00:00 (60/69): device-mapper-multipath-0.4.7-48.el5_8.1.x86_64 | 3.0 MB 00:00 (61/69): mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64.rpm | 3.5 MB 00:03 (62/69): coreutils-5.97-34.el5_8.1.x86_64.rpm | 3.6 MB 00:00 (63/69): gcc-c++-4.1.2-52.el5_8.1.x86_64.rpm | 3.8 MB 00:00 (64/69): glibc-2.5-81.el5_8.7.x86_64.rpm | 4.8 MB 00:01 (65/69): gcc-4.1.2-52.el5_8.1.x86_64.rpm | 5.3 MB 00:01 (66/69): glibc-2.5-81.el5_8.7.i686.rpm | 5.4 MB 00:01 (67/69): python-libs-2.4.3-46.el5_8.2.x86_64.rpm | 5.9 MB 00:01 (68/69): mysql-server-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64.rpm | 13 MB 00:07 (69/69): glibc-common-2.5-81.el5_8.7.x86_64.rpm | 16 MB 00:03 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 2.4 MB/s | 106 MB 00:44 Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Check Error: file /etc/my.cnf from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/bin/mysqlaccess from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/my_print_defaults.1.gz from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/mysql.1.gz from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/mysql_config.1.gz from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/mysql_find_rows.1.gz from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/mysql_waitpid.1.gz from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/mysqlaccess.1.gz from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/mysqladmin.1.gz from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/mysqldump.1.gz from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/mysqlshow.1.gz from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/charsets/Index.xml from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/charsets/cp1250.xml from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/charsets/cp1251.xml from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/czech/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/danish/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/dutch/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/english/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/estonian/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/french/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/german/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/greek/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/hungarian/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/italian/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/japanese/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/korean/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/norwegian-ny/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/norwegian/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/polish/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/portuguese/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/romanian/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/russian/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/serbian/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/slovak/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/spanish/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/swedish/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/ukrainian/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.77-4.el5_6.6.i386 file /etc/my.cnf from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/bin/mysql_find_rows from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/bin/mysqlaccess from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/my_print_defaults.1.gz from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/mysql.1.gz from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/mysql_config.1.gz from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/mysql_find_rows.1.gz from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/mysql_waitpid.1.gz from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/mysqlaccess.1.gz from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/mysqladmin.1.gz from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/mysqldump.1.gz from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/man/man1/mysqlshow.1.gz from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/charsets/Index.xml from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/charsets/cp1250.xml from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/charsets/cp1251.xml from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/czech/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/danish/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/dutch/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/english/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/estonian/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/french/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/german/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/greek/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/hungarian/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/italian/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/japanese/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/korean/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/norwegian-ny/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/norwegian/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/polish/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/portuguese/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/romanian/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/russian/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/serbian/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/slovak/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/spanish/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/swedish/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58-jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 file /usr/share/mysql/ukrainian/errmsg.sys from install of mysql-5.1.58- jason.1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-5.0.95-1.el5_7.1.i386 Error Summary Thank you for help, Best regards, Nemanja

    Read the article

  • .NET 2.0 "not installed" after upgrade to Windows 7

    - by Greg B
    I Recently upgraded to Windows 7 (Business) RTM from Vista Business and everything is going great, it fixed the BSOD I was getting and the performance of my laptop is improved. However; during the upgrade, something seems to have gone awry with my .NET 2.0 installation. When attempting to install FlashDevelop, I get the following error from the installer package You need to install Maicrtosoft.NET 2.0 runtime before installing FlasgDevelop. You Have . I have a previous release of FD installed from before the upgrade and this still works fine. So I gave up on the new version of FD and got on with my day. Then I tried to install the Microsoft SQL Server Database Publishing Wizard 1.1 and that says I am missing a couple of prerequisites, one of which is .NET 2.0. When I download the .NET 2.0 runtime the installer fails, telling me that This product is already installed as part of the operating system. Does anyone have any idea how to make my computer recognise that .NET 2 is in fact installed. UPDATE I've checked Windows Features and everything relating to .NET is already installed. I've also been through my list of installed programs looking for .NET to in an attempt to uninstall it but it isn't there. In fact, the only thing that looks like a .NET distro that I am able to uninstall is the 3.5 Compact Framework.

    Read the article

  • Silent install FirePro v4900 Driver on Windows Embedded 7 Standard

    - by Birgit_B
    I'm trying to install the Drivers for a FirePro v4900 on a Windows Embedded 7 Standard 64bit OS. I want the system to be as small as possible, so i would rather not install the whole catalyst control center, but only the necessary drivers. Because the installation should be accomplished absolutely unattended, the installation process of the FirePro-Driver should also be done without any user interaction. I see two possible solutions for the Problem: Install only the Drivers: Is it possible to solely install the necessary drivers? How would i achieve that? This solution would be the preferred one, because of the smaller footprint. Silent custom install the provided "FirePro_8.911.3.3_VistaWin7_X32X64_135673.exe" (found at ATI FirePro™ Driver). Is there a way, to do that? Thank you in advance for your support! Update: I managed to accomplish a silent installation. I extracted the contents of the above mention installer-file and ran \$_OUTDIR\Bin64\Setup.exe -Install. (There are some other Parameters, just run Setup.exe /?). But i couldn't achieve to just install the drivers without the Cataclyst Control Center, and it seams the Control Center has some unfulfilled dependencies and so it crashes...

    Read the article

  • Common Live Upgrade problems

    - by user12611829
    As I have worked with customers deploying Live Upgrade in their environments, several problems seem to surface over and over. With this blog article, I will try to collect these troubles, as well as suggest some workarounds. If this sounds like the beginnings of a Wiki, you would be right. At present, there is not enough material for one, so we will use this blog for the time being. I do expect new material to be posted on occasion, so if you wish to bookmark it for future reference, a permanent link can be found here. Live Upgrade copies over ZFS root clone This was introduced in Solaris 10 10/09 (u8) and the root of the problem is a duplicate entry in the source boot environments ICF configuration file. Prior to u8, a ZFS root file system was not included in /etc/vfstab, since the mount is implicit at boot time. Starting with u8, the root file system is included in /etc/vfstab, and when the boot environment is scanned to create the ICF file, a duplicate entry is recorded. Here's what the error looks like. # lucreate -n s10u9-baseline Checking GRUB menu... System has findroot enabled GRUB Analyzing system configuration. Comparing source boot environment file systems with the file system(s) you specified for the new boot environment. Determining which file systems should be in the new boot environment. Updating boot environment description database on all BEs. Updating system configuration files. Creating configuration for boot environment . Source boot environment is . Creating boot environment . Creating file systems on boot environment . Creating file system for in zone on . The error indicator ----- /usr/lib/lu/lumkfs: test: unknown operator zfs Populating file systems on boot environment . Checking selection integrity. Integrity check OK. Populating contents of mount point . This should not happen ------ Copying. Ctrl-C and cleanup If you weren't paying close attention, you might not even know this is an error. The symptoms are lucreate times that are way too long due to the extraneous copy, or the one that alerted me to the problem, the root file system is filling up - again thanks to a redundant copy. This problem has already been identified and corrected, and a patch (121431-58 or later for x86, 121430-57 for SPARC) is available. Unfortunately, this patch has not yet made it into the Solaris 10 Recommended Patch Cluster. Applying the prerequisite patches from the latest cluster is a recommendation from the Live Upgrade Survival Guide blog, so an additional step will be required until the patch is included. Let's see how this works. # patchadd -p | grep 121431 Patch: 121429-13 Obsoletes: Requires: 120236-01 121431-16 Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWluzone Patch: 121431-54 Obsoletes: 121436-05 121438-02 Requires: Incompatibles: Packages: SUNWlucfg SUNWluu SUNWlur # unzip 121431-58 # patchadd 121431-58 Validating patches... Loading patches installed on the system... Done! Loading patches requested to install. Done! Checking patches that you specified for installation. Done! Approved patches will be installed in this order: 121431-58 Checking installed patches... Executing prepatch script... Installing patch packages... Patch 121431-58 has been successfully installed. See /var/sadm/patch/121431-58/log for details Executing postpatch script... Patch packages installed: SUNWlucfg SUNWlur SUNWluu # lucreate -n s10u9-baseline Checking GRUB menu... System has findroot enabled GRUB Analyzing system configuration. INFORMATION: Unable to determine size or capacity of slice . Comparing source boot environment file systems with the file system(s) you specified for the new boot environment. Determining which file systems should be in the new boot environment. INFORMATION: Unable to determine size or capacity of slice . Updating boot environment description database on all BEs. Updating system configuration files. Creating configuration for boot environment . Source boot environment is . Creating boot environment . Cloning file systems from boot environment to create boot environment . Creating snapshot for on . Creating clone for on . Setting canmount=noauto for in zone on . Saving existing file in top level dataset for BE as //boot/grub/menu.lst.prev. Saving existing file in top level dataset for BE as //boot/grub/menu.lst.prev. Saving existing file in top level dataset for BE as //boot/grub/menu.lst.prev. File propagation successful Copied GRUB menu from PBE to ABE No entry for BE in GRUB menu Population of boot environment successful. Creation of boot environment successful. This time it took just a few seconds. A cursory examination of the offending ICF file (/etc/lu/ICF.3 in this case) shows that the duplicate root file system entry is now gone. # cat /etc/lu/ICF.3 s10u8-baseline:-:/dev/zvol/dsk/panroot/swap:swap:8388608 s10u8-baseline:/:panroot/ROOT/s10u8-baseline:zfs:0 s10u8-baseline:/vbox:pandora/vbox:zfs:0 s10u8-baseline:/setup:pandora/setup:zfs:0 s10u8-baseline:/export:pandora/export:zfs:0 s10u8-baseline:/pandora:pandora:zfs:0 s10u8-baseline:/panroot:panroot:zfs:0 s10u8-baseline:/workshop:pandora/workshop:zfs:0 s10u8-baseline:/export/iso:pandora/iso:zfs:0 s10u8-baseline:/export/home:pandora/home:zfs:0 s10u8-baseline:/vbox/HardDisks:pandora/vbox/HardDisks:zfs:0 s10u8-baseline:/vbox/HardDisks/WinXP:pandora/vbox/HardDisks/WinXP:zfs:0 Solaris 10 9/10 introduces new autoregistration file This one is actually mentioned in the Oracle Solaris 9/10 release notes. I know, I hate it when that happens too. Here's what the "error" looks like. # luupgrade -u -s /mnt -n s10u9-baseline System has findroot enabled GRUB No entry for BE in GRUB menu Copying failsafe kernel from media. 61364 blocks miniroot filesystem is Mounting miniroot at ERROR: The auto registration file does not exist or incomplete. The auto registration file is mandatory for this upgrade. Use -k argument along with luupgrade command. autoreg_file is path to auto registration information file. See sysidcfg(4) for a list of valid keywords for use in this file. The format of the file is as follows. oracle_user=xxxx oracle_pw=xxxx http_proxy_host=xxxx http_proxy_port=xxxx http_proxy_user=xxxx http_proxy_pw=xxxx For more details refer "Oracle Solaris 10 9/10 Installation Guide: Planning for Installation and Upgrade". As with the previous problem, this is also easy to work around. Assuming that you don't want to use the auto-registration feature at upgrade time, create a file that contains just autoreg=disable and pass the filename on to luupgrade. Here is an example. # echo "autoreg=disable" /var/tmp/no-autoreg # luupgrade -u -s /mnt -k /var/tmp/no-autoreg -n s10u9-baseline System has findroot enabled GRUB No entry for BE in GRUB menu Copying failsafe kernel from media. 61364 blocks miniroot filesystem is Mounting miniroot at ####################################################################### NOTE: To improve products and services, Oracle Solaris communicates configuration data to Oracle after rebooting. You can register your version of Oracle Solaris to capture this data for your use, or the data is sent anonymously. For information about what configuration data is communicated and how to control this facility, see the Release Notes or www.oracle.com/goto/solarisautoreg. INFORMATION: After activated and booted into new BE , Auto Registration happens automatically with the following Information autoreg=disable ####################################################################### Validating the contents of the media . The media is a standard Solaris media. The media contains an operating system upgrade image. The media contains version . Constructing upgrade profile to use. Locating the operating system upgrade program. Checking for existence of previously scheduled Live Upgrade requests. Creating upgrade profile for BE . Checking for GRUB menu on ABE . Saving GRUB menu on ABE . Checking for x86 boot partition on ABE. Determining packages to install or upgrade for BE . Performing the operating system upgrade of the BE . CAUTION: Interrupting this process may leave the boot environment unstable or unbootable. The Live Upgrade operation now proceeds as expected. Once the system upgrade is complete, we can manually register the system. If you want to do a hands off registration during the upgrade, see the Oracle Solaris Auto Registration section of the Oracle Solaris Release Notes for instructions on how to do that. Technocrati Tags: Oracle Solaris Patching Live Upgrade var sc_project=1193495; var sc_invisible=1; var sc_security="a46f6831";

    Read the article

  • Package upgrade on Ubuntu raid server and grub setup issue

    - by RecNes
    I have remote Ubuntu 10.10 server running on raid system. I did package upgrade yesterday night for security reasons. During the upgrade, grub installation screen appeared and asked me which partition I wanted to install grub. Options are sda,sdb,md1 and md2. I decide to install them on both sda and sdb partitions. I wondering, was I make true decision? If machine get reboot is it can be boot up safely? You can find fdisk output and fstab mount points below: Fstab: proc /proc proc defaults 0 0 none /dev/pts devpts gid=5,mode=620 0 0 /dev/md0 none swap sw 0 0 /dev/md1 /boot ext3 defaults 0 0 /dev/md2 / ext3 defaults 0 0 Fdisk: Disk /dev/sda: 750.2 GB, 750156374016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 91201 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00029bb5 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 1 262 2102562 fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sda2 263 295 265072+ fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sda3 296 91201 730202445 fd Linux raid autodetect Disk /dev/md0: 2152 MB, 2152923136 bytes 2 heads, 4 sectors/track, 525616 cylinders Units = cylinders of 8 * 512 = 4096 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00000000 Disk /dev/md0 doesn't contain a valid partition table Disk /dev/md1: 271 MB, 271319040 bytes 2 heads, 4 sectors/track, 66240 cylinders Units = cylinders of 8 * 512 = 4096 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00000000 Disk /dev/md1 doesn't contain a valid partition table Disk /dev/md2: 747.7 GB, 747727224832 bytes 2 heads, 4 sectors/track, 182550592 cylinders Units = cylinders of 8 * 512 = 4096 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00000000 Disk /dev/md2 doesn't contain a valid partition table Disk /dev/sdb: 750.2 GB, 750156374016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 91201 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00088969 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sdb1 1 262 2102562 fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sdb2 263 295 265072+ fd Linux raid autodetect /dev/sdb3 296 91201 730202445 fd Linux raid autodetect

    Read the article

  • How do I restart a Windows XP upgrade?

    - by Jason
    Is there a registry tweek to tell Windows Setup to start over? It tries to continue where it left off after I reboot. I can get to the Recovery Console. I tried to go from SP2-SP3. It failed, and I couldn't get to Safe Mode. I put in the SP1 disk (I don't have an SP2 boot disk, just the upgrade package.) It ran a couple minutes then gave me the error "the signature for windows xp professional upgrade is invalid" error code 800b0100. I rebooted to Safe Mode. I get to Safe Mode then say "Window XP Setup can't run under Safe Mode" press ok to restart. I put the SP3 disk back in, trying to get the "repair" option I didn't ever see putting in the SP1 disk, and it tried to continue the SP1 install - on the 4th step, and then gave the same signature error above. I need to get it to start over, so I can get to the repair option, to go back to SP2 (or install SP1 then add SP2 to it). Is there a registry tweek to tell Windows Setup to start over?

    Read the article

  • 5 year old server upgrade

    - by rizzo0917
    I am looking to upgrade a server for a web app. Currently the application is running very sluggish. We've made some adjustments to mysql (that's another issue in itself) and made some adjustments so that heaviest quires get run on a copy of the database on another server was have as a backup, however this will not last that much longer and we are looking to upgrade. Currently the servers CPUs are (4) Intel(R) XEON(TM) CPU 2.00GHz, with 1 gig of ram. The database is 442.5 MiB, with about 1,743,808 records. There are two parts of the program, the one, side a, inserts and updates most of the data. Side b, reads the data and does some minor updates. Currently our biggest day for side a are 800 users (of 40,000 users all year) imputing the system. And our Side b is currently unknown, however we have a total of 1000 clients. The system is most likely going to cap out at 5000 side b clients, with about a year 300,000 side a users. The current database is 5 years old, so we can most likely expect the database to grow pretty rapidly, possibly double each year (which we can most likely archive older records if it comes to that). So with that being said, should we get a server for each side of the app, side a being the master, side b being the slave, any updates made on side b are router to side a. So the question is should i get 2 of these or 1. 2 x Intel Nehalem Xeon E5520 2.26Ghz (8 Cores) 12GB DDRIII Memory 500GB SATAII HDD 100Mbps Port Speed And Naturally I would need to have a redundant backup so it could potentially be 4 of them.

    Read the article

  • Windows 7 Upgrade Fail from Home Premium to Ultimate Professional

    - by Michael S-B
    I had a hard drive crash, which meant I had to install a new HDD in my Dell 64-Bit XPS 1350 (lovely computer). I had previously been running Windows 7 Ultimate Professional which I had upgraded from the OEM Win 7 Home Premium by means of a disk I purchased from my university. Using the Recovery disk from Dell I installed Windows 7 Home Premium successfully on the new hard drive, but when I have tried to upgrade via my disk to Ultimate it installs the whole thing, says its complete, but when I reboot, tells me: "This version of Windows could not be installed. Your previous version of Windows has been restored, and you can continue to use it." I've installed the drivers from Dell's driver disk, but still to no avail. I've also used Driver Robot to update all my drivers. I can't find a .dmp file anywhere under C:\$WINDOWS.~BT\Sources but I did find this file under C:\$WINDOWS.~BT\Sources\Panther. setupact.log https://www.dropbox.com/s/yzy7fhkxlzc235y/setupact.log If anyone could please advise me what I need to do to fix Windows so it will upgrade properly, I would greatly appreciate it.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19  | Next Page >