Search Results

Search found 49404 results on 1977 pages for 'string search'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 12/1977 | < Previous Page | 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19  | Next Page >

  • Finding out why Dell Controler is Degraded

    - by Kyle Brandt
    I installed open manage on a couple of my PE 2950s for snmp monitoring of the RAID. All the checks seem to come back okay except for controllerState: [root@aMachine ~]# snmpwalk -v 2c -c bestNotToPostPasswords myMachine -m +StorageManagement-MIB controllerstate StorageManagement-MIB::controllerState.1 = INTEGER: degraded(6) Other checks seems to indicate the battery, LD, and physicals disks are all good unless I missing something. Can anyone tell if I am missing something or neglecting something import in my RAID monitoring/understanding? I get degraded for both these servers I have set up. A walk of the entire storage management tree for on of them: StorageManagement-MIB::softwareVersion.0 = STRING: "3.2.0" StorageManagement-MIB::globalStatus.0 = INTEGER: warning(2) StorageManagement-MIB::softwareManufacturer.0 = STRING: "Dell Inc." StorageManagement-MIB::softwareProduct.0 = STRING: "Server Administrator (Storage Management)" StorageManagement-MIB::softwareDescription.0 = STRING: "Configuration and monitoring of disk storage devices." StorageManagement-MIB::displayName.0 = STRING: "Server Administrator (Storage Management)" StorageManagement-MIB::description.0 = STRING: "Configuration and monitoring of disk storage devices." StorageManagement-MIB::agentVendor.0 = STRING: "Dell Inc." StorageManagement-MIB::agentTimeStamp.0 = INTEGER: 1273842310 StorageManagement-MIB::agentGetTimeout.0 = INTEGER: 5 StorageManagement-MIB::agentModifiers.0 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::agentRefreshRate.0 = INTEGER: 300 StorageManagement-MIB::agentMibVersion.0 = STRING: "3.2" StorageManagement-MIB::agentManagementSoftwareURLName.0 = "" StorageManagement-MIB::agentGlobalSystemStatus.0 = INTEGER: nonCritical(4) StorageManagement-MIB::agentLastGlobalSystemStatus.0 = INTEGER: ok(3) StorageManagement-MIB::agentSmartThermalShutdown.0 = INTEGER: notApplicable(3) StorageManagement-MIB::controllerNumber.1 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::controllerName.1 = STRING: "PERC 5/i Integrated" StorageManagement-MIB::controllerVendor.1 = STRING: "DELL" StorageManagement-MIB::controllerType.1 = INTEGER: sas(6) StorageManagement-MIB::controllerState.1 = INTEGER: degraded(6) StorageManagement-MIB::controllerRebuildRateInPercent.1 = INTEGER: 30 StorageManagement-MIB::controllerFWVersion.1 = STRING: "5.0.2-0003" StorageManagement-MIB::controllerCacheSizeInMB.1 = INTEGER: 256 StorageManagement-MIB::controllerCacheSizeInBytes.1 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::controllerPhysicalDeviceCount.1 = INTEGER: 5 StorageManagement-MIB::controllerLogicalDeviceCount.1 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::controllerRollUpStatus.1 = INTEGER: nonCritical(4) StorageManagement-MIB::controllerComponentStatus.1 = INTEGER: nonCritical(4) StorageManagement-MIB::controllerNexusID.1 = STRING: "\\0" StorageManagement-MIB::controllerAlarmState.1 = INTEGER: disabled(2) StorageManagement-MIB::controllerDriverVersion.1 = STRING: "00.00.03.05 " StorageManagement-MIB::controllerPCISlot.1 = STRING: "embedded" StorageManagement-MIB::controllerClusterMode.1 = INTEGER: notApplicable(99) StorageManagement-MIB::controllerMinFWVersion.1 = STRING: "5.2.1-0067" StorageManagement-MIB::controllerMinDriverVersion.1 = STRING: "00.00.03.21" StorageManagement-MIB::controllerChannelCount.1 = INTEGER: 2 StorageManagement-MIB::controllerReconstructRate.1 = INTEGER: 30 StorageManagement-MIB::controllerPatrolReadRate.1 = INTEGER: 30 StorageManagement-MIB::controllerBGIRate.1 = INTEGER: 30 StorageManagement-MIB::controllerCheckConsistencyRate.1 = INTEGER: 30 StorageManagement-MIB::controllerPatrolReadMode.1 = INTEGER: automatic(1) StorageManagement-MIB::controllerPatrolReadState.1 = INTEGER: stopped(1) StorageManagement-MIB::controllerPatrolReadIterations.1 = INTEGER: 162 StorageManagement-MIB::controllerEntry.57.1 = INTEGER: 99 StorageManagement-MIB::controllerEntry.58.1 = INTEGER: 99 StorageManagement-MIB::channelNumber.1 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::channelNumber.2 = INTEGER: 2 StorageManagement-MIB::channelName.1 = STRING: "Connector 0" StorageManagement-MIB::channelName.2 = STRING: "Connector 1" StorageManagement-MIB::channelState.1 = INTEGER: ready(1) StorageManagement-MIB::channelState.2 = INTEGER: ready(1) StorageManagement-MIB::channelRollUpStatus.1 = INTEGER: ok(3) StorageManagement-MIB::channelRollUpStatus.2 = INTEGER: ok(3) StorageManagement-MIB::channelComponentStatus.1 = INTEGER: ok(3) StorageManagement-MIB::channelComponentStatus.2 = INTEGER: ok(3) StorageManagement-MIB::channelNexusID.1 = STRING: "\\0\\0" StorageManagement-MIB::channelNexusID.2 = STRING: "\\0\\1" StorageManagement-MIB::channelBusType.1 = INTEGER: sas(8) StorageManagement-MIB::channelBusType.2 = INTEGER: sas(8) StorageManagement-MIB::enclosureNumber.1 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::enclosureName.1 = STRING: "Backplane" StorageManagement-MIB::enclosureVendor.1 = STRING: "DELL" StorageManagement-MIB::enclosureState.1 = INTEGER: ready(1) StorageManagement-MIB::enclosureProductID.1 = STRING: "BACKPLANE " StorageManagement-MIB::enclosureType.1 = INTEGER: internal(1) StorageManagement-MIB::enclosureChannelNumber.1 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::enclosureRollUpStatus.1 = INTEGER: ok(3) StorageManagement-MIB::enclosureComponentStatus.1 = INTEGER: ok(3) StorageManagement-MIB::enclosureNexusID.1 = STRING: "\\0\\0\\0" StorageManagement-MIB::enclosureFirmwareVersion.1 = STRING: "1.00" StorageManagement-MIB::enclosureSASAddress.1 = STRING: "50019090B4C67200" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskNumber.1 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskNumber.2 = INTEGER: 2 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskNumber.3 = INTEGER: 3 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskNumber.4 = INTEGER: 4 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskName.1 = STRING: "Physical Disk 0:0:0" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskName.2 = STRING: "Physical Disk 0:0:1" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskName.3 = STRING: "Physical Disk 0:0:2" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskName.4 = STRING: "Physical Disk 0:0:3" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskVendor.1 = STRING: "DELL " StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskVendor.2 = STRING: "DELL " StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskVendor.3 = STRING: "DELL " StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskVendor.4 = STRING: "DELL " StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskState.1 = INTEGER: online(3) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskState.2 = INTEGER: online(3) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskState.3 = INTEGER: online(3) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskState.4 = INTEGER: online(3) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskProductID.1 = STRING: "ST3146755SS " StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskProductID.2 = STRING: "ST3146755SS " StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskProductID.3 = STRING: "ST3146755SS " StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskProductID.4 = STRING: "ST3146755SS " StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskSerialNo.1 = STRING: "3LN0LRL0 " StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskSerialNo.2 = STRING: "3LN0JYJS " StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskSerialNo.3 = STRING: "3LN0LR0V " StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskSerialNo.4 = STRING: "3LN0JH97 " StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskRevision.1 = STRING: "T106" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskRevision.2 = STRING: "T106" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskRevision.3 = STRING: "T106" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskRevision.4 = STRING: "T106" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureID.1 = STRING: "0" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureID.2 = STRING: "0" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureID.3 = STRING: "0" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureID.4 = STRING: "0" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskChannel.1 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskChannel.2 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskChannel.3 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskChannel.4 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLengthInMB.1 = INTEGER: 139392 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLengthInMB.2 = INTEGER: 139392 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLengthInMB.3 = INTEGER: 139392 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLengthInMB.4 = INTEGER: 139392 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLengthInBytes.1 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLengthInBytes.2 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLengthInBytes.3 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLengthInBytes.4 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLargestContiguousFreeSpaceInMB.1 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLargestContiguousFreeSpaceInMB.2 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLargestContiguousFreeSpaceInMB.3 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLargestContiguousFreeSpaceInMB.4 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLargestContiguousFreeSpaceInBytes.1 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLargestContiguousFreeSpaceInBytes.2 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLargestContiguousFreeSpaceInBytes.3 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLargestContiguousFreeSpaceInBytes.4 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskTargetID.1 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskTargetID.2 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskTargetID.3 = INTEGER: 2 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskTargetID.4 = INTEGER: 3 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLunID.1 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLunID.2 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLunID.3 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLunID.4 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskUsedSpaceInMB.1 = INTEGER: 139392 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskUsedSpaceInMB.2 = INTEGER: 139392 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskUsedSpaceInMB.3 = INTEGER: 139392 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskUsedSpaceInMB.4 = INTEGER: 139392 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskUsedSpaceInBytes.1 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskUsedSpaceInBytes.2 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskUsedSpaceInBytes.3 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskUsedSpaceInBytes.4 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskFreeSpaceInMB.1 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskFreeSpaceInMB.2 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskFreeSpaceInMB.3 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskFreeSpaceInMB.4 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskFreeSpaceInBytes.1 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskFreeSpaceInBytes.2 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskFreeSpaceInBytes.3 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskFreeSpaceInBytes.4 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskBusType.1 = INTEGER: sas(8) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskBusType.2 = INTEGER: sas(8) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskBusType.3 = INTEGER: sas(8) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskBusType.4 = INTEGER: sas(8) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskSpareState.1 = INTEGER: notASpare(5) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskSpareState.2 = INTEGER: notASpare(5) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskSpareState.3 = INTEGER: notASpare(5) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskSpareState.4 = INTEGER: notASpare(5) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskRollUpStatus.1 = INTEGER: ok(3) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskRollUpStatus.2 = INTEGER: ok(3) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskRollUpStatus.3 = INTEGER: ok(3) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskRollUpStatus.4 = INTEGER: ok(3) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskComponentStatus.1 = INTEGER: ok(3) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskComponentStatus.2 = INTEGER: ok(3) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskComponentStatus.3 = INTEGER: ok(3) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskComponentStatus.4 = INTEGER: ok(3) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskNexusID.1 = STRING: "\\0\\0\\0\\0" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskNexusID.2 = STRING: "\\0\\0\\0\\1" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskNexusID.3 = STRING: "\\0\\0\\0\\2" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskNexusID.4 = STRING: "\\0\\0\\0\\3" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskPartNumber.1 = STRING: "SG0DR2381253172FLRL0A00 " StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskPartNumber.2 = STRING: "SG0DR2381253172FJYJSA00 " StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskPartNumber.3 = STRING: "SG0DR2381253172FLR0VA00 " StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskPartNumber.4 = STRING: "SG0DR2381253172FJH97A00 " StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskSASAddress.1 = STRING: "5000C50002380201" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskSASAddress.2 = STRING: "5000C50002385B89" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskSASAddress.3 = STRING: "5000C50002385AA9" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskSASAddress.4 = STRING: "5000C500023841E1" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskSmartAlertIndication.1 = INTEGER: no(1) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskSmartAlertIndication.2 = INTEGER: no(1) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskSmartAlertIndication.3 = INTEGER: no(1) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskSmartAlertIndication.4 = INTEGER: no(1) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskManufactureDay.1 = STRING: "07" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskManufactureDay.2 = STRING: "07" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskManufactureDay.3 = STRING: "07" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskManufactureDay.4 = STRING: "07" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskManufactureWeek.1 = STRING: "07" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskManufactureWeek.2 = STRING: "07" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskManufactureWeek.3 = STRING: "07" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskManufactureWeek.4 = STRING: "07" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskManufactureYear.1 = STRING: "2005" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskManufactureYear.2 = STRING: "2005" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskManufactureYear.3 = STRING: "2005" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskManufactureYear.4 = STRING: "2005" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskMediaType.1 = INTEGER: hdd(2) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskMediaType.2 = INTEGER: hdd(2) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskMediaType.3 = INTEGER: hdd(2) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskMediaType.4 = INTEGER: hdd(2) StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEntry.36.1 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEntry.36.2 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEntry.36.3 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEntry.36.4 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEntry.40.1 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEntry.40.2 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEntry.40.3 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEntry.40.4 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEntry.41.1 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEntry.41.2 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEntry.41.3 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEntry.41.4 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionNumber.1 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionNumber.2 = INTEGER: 2 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionNumber.3 = INTEGER: 3 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionNumber.4 = INTEGER: 4 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionArrayDiskName.1 = STRING: "Physical Disk 0:0:0" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionArrayDiskName.2 = STRING: "Physical Disk 0:0:1" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionArrayDiskName.3 = STRING: "Physical Disk 0:0:2" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionArrayDiskName.4 = STRING: "Physical Disk 0:0:3" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionArrayDiskNumber.1 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionArrayDiskNumber.2 = INTEGER: 2 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionArrayDiskNumber.3 = INTEGER: 3 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionArrayDiskNumber.4 = INTEGER: 4 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionEnclosureName.1 = STRING: "Backplane" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionEnclosureName.2 = STRING: "Backplane" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionEnclosureName.3 = STRING: "Backplane" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionEnclosureName.4 = STRING: "Backplane" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionEnclosureNumber.1 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionEnclosureNumber.2 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionEnclosureNumber.3 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionEnclosureNumber.4 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionControllerName.1 = STRING: "PERC 5/i Integrated" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionControllerName.2 = STRING: "PERC 5/i Integrated" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionControllerName.3 = STRING: "PERC 5/i Integrated" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionControllerName.4 = STRING: "PERC 5/i Integrated" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionControllerNumber.1 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionControllerNumber.2 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionControllerNumber.3 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskEnclosureConnectionControllerNumber.4 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::batteryNumber.1 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::batteryName.1 = STRING: "Battery 0" StorageManagement-MIB::batteryVendor.1 = STRING: "DELL" StorageManagement-MIB::batteryState.1 = INTEGER: ready(1) StorageManagement-MIB::batteryRollUpStatus.1 = INTEGER: ok(3) StorageManagement-MIB::batteryComponentStatus.1 = INTEGER: ok(3) StorageManagement-MIB::batteryNexusID.1 = STRING: "\\0\\0" StorageManagement-MIB::batteryPredictedCapacity.1 = INTEGER: ready(2) StorageManagement-MIB::batteryNextLearnTime.1 = INTEGER: 21 StorageManagement-MIB::batteryLearnState.1 = INTEGER: idle(16) StorageManagement-MIB::batteryEntry.13.1 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::batteryMaxLearnDelay.1 = INTEGER: 168 StorageManagement-MIB::batteryConnectionNumber.1 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::batteryConnectionBatteryName.1 = STRING: "Battery 0" StorageManagement-MIB::batteryConnectionBatteryNumber.1 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::batteryConnectionControllerName.1 = STRING: "PERC 5/i Integrated" StorageManagement-MIB::batteryConnectionControllerNumber.1 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::virtualDiskNumber.1 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::virtualDiskName.1 = STRING: "Virtual Disk 0" StorageManagement-MIB::virtualDiskDeviceName.1 = STRING: "/dev/sda" StorageManagement-MIB::virtualDiskState.1 = INTEGER: ready(1) StorageManagement-MIB::virtualDiskLengthInMB.1 = INTEGER: 278784 StorageManagement-MIB::virtualDiskLengthInBytes.1 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::virtualDiskWritePolicy.1 = INTEGER: writeBack(3) StorageManagement-MIB::virtualDiskReadPolicy.1 = INTEGER: noReadAhead(5) StorageManagement-MIB::virtualDiskCachePolicy.1 = INTEGER: not-applicable(99) StorageManagement-MIB::virtualDiskLayout.1 = INTEGER: raid-10(10) StorageManagement-MIB::virtualDiskCurStripeSizeInMB.1 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::virtualDiskCurStripeSizeInBytes.1 = INTEGER: 65536 StorageManagement-MIB::virtualDiskTargetID.1 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::virtualDiskRollUpStatus.1 = INTEGER: ok(3) StorageManagement-MIB::virtualDiskComponentStatus.1 = INTEGER: ok(3) StorageManagement-MIB::virtualDiskNexusID.1 = STRING: "\\0\\0" StorageManagement-MIB::virtualDiskArrayDiskType.1 = INTEGER: sas(1) StorageManagement-MIB::virtualDiskEntry.23.1 = INTEGER: 2 StorageManagement-MIB::virtualDiskEntry.24.1 = INTEGER: 0 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLogicalConnectionNumber.1 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLogicalConnectionNumber.2 = INTEGER: 2 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLogicalConnectionNumber.3 = INTEGER: 3 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLogicalConnectionNumber.4 = INTEGER: 4 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLogicalConnectionArrayDiskName.1 = STRING: "Physical Disk 0:0:0" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLogicalConnectionArrayDiskName.2 = STRING: "Physical Disk 0:0:1" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLogicalConnectionArrayDiskName.3 = STRING: "Physical Disk 0:0:2" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLogicalConnectionArrayDiskName.4 = STRING: "Physical Disk 0:0:3" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLogicalConnectionArrayDiskNumber.1 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLogicalConnectionArrayDiskNumber.2 = INTEGER: 2 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLogicalConnectionArrayDiskNumber.3 = INTEGER: 3 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLogicalConnectionArrayDiskNumber.4 = INTEGER: 4 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLogicalConnectionVirtualDiskName.1 = STRING: "Virtual Disk 0" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLogicalConnectionVirtualDiskName.2 = STRING: "Virtual Disk 0" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLogicalConnectionVirtualDiskName.3 = STRING: "Virtual Disk 0" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLogicalConnectionVirtualDiskName.4 = STRING: "Virtual Disk 0" StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLogicalConnectionVirtualDiskNumber.1 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLogicalConnectionVirtualDiskNumber.2 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLogicalConnectionVirtualDiskNumber.3 = INTEGER: 1 StorageManagement-MIB::arrayDiskLogicalConnectionVirtualDiskNumber.4 = INTEGER: 1

    Read the article

  • Apache Solr: What is a good strategy for creating a tag/attribute based search for an image.

    - by Development 4.0
    I recently read an article about YayMicro that descries how they used solr to search their photos. I would like doing something similar (but on a smaller scale). I have figured out how to have solr to search text files, but I would like to learn what the best way to associate images with semi structured/unstructured text. Do I create an xml file with an image link in it? I basically want to input a search string and have it return a grid of images. Yay Micro Article Link

    Read the article

  • How to easily use Windows 7 search advanced options?

    - by Scott Evernden
    Is there an alternative to trying to remember all the advanced search options? Like an actual GUI as we had for windows XP? As powerful as Windows Search apparently is, I cannot possibly remember all the options available. How is a mere mortal like my Dad supposed to understand and retain all this? I get the shakes every time i need to find something on Win 7. Anyone have some relief? Part 2: Why does it RE-run a search if i add a column and try to sort on that?

    Read the article

  • Adding search for a private website

    - by Vitor Py
    I have a login-protected website. It's an internal application and it's not avaiable to the general public hence it's not indexed by any search engine. My application is developed on the Google App Engine. I would like to add a search engine but obviously without the need to public index it. There's any solution avaiable from Google/Bing/Others for a situation like this? Have you done this before? What solution did you chose and what are yours results?

    Read the article

  • Storing search result for paging and sorting

    - by Mattias
    I've been implementing MS Search Server 2010 and so far its really good. Im doing the search queries via their web service, but due to the inconsistent results, im thinking about caching the result instead. The site is a small intranet (500 employees), so it shouldnt be any problems, but im curious what approach you would take if it was a bigger site. I've googled abit, but havent really come over anything specific. So, a few questions: What other approaches are there? And why are they better? How much does it cost to store a dataview of 400-500 rows? What sizes are feasible? Other points you should take into consideration. Any input is welcome :)

    Read the article

  • Mysterious subdomains to my site indexed by Google

    - by shouren
    Stackers, We have an issue with strange subdomains pointing to (pages on) our site such as: www2.example.com 2.example.com anothersite.com.example.com A few things are perplexing: who created them? why they do that? why Google index them and made them appear in the search results when clicking them gets a 5xx error. how can we get rid of them? It seems some type of scams that hurt our site's free search and experience. Anyone had similar experience and knows the answers? Really appreciate it!

    Read the article

  • String length differs from Javascript to Java code

    - by François P.
    I've got a JSP page with a piece of Javascript validation code which limits to a certain amount of characters on submit. I'm using a <textarea> so I can't simply use a length attribute like in a <input type="text">. I use document.getElementById("text").value.length to get the string length. I'm running Firefox 3.0 on Windows (but I've tested this behavior with IE 6 also). The form gets submitted to a J2EE servlet. In my Java servlet the string length of the parameter is larger than 2000! I've noticed that this can easily be reproduced by adding carriage returns in the <textarea>. I've used Firebug to assert the length of the <textare> and it really is 2000 characters long. On the Java side though, the carriage returns get converted to UNIX style (\r\n, instead of \n), thus the string length differs! Am I missing something obvious here or what ? If not, how would you reliably (cross-platform / browser) make sure that the <textarea> is limited.

    Read the article

  • Algorithm to see if keywords exist inside a string

    - by rksprst
    Let's say I have a set of keywords in an array {"olympics", "sports tennis best", "tennis", "tennis rules"} I then have a large list (up to 50 at a time) of strings (or actually tweets), so they are a max of 140 characters. I want to look at each string and see what keywords are present there. In the case where a keyword is composed of multiple words like "sports tennis best", the words don't have to be together in the string, but all of them have to show up. I've having trouble figuring out an algorithm that does this efficiently. Do you guys have suggestions on a way to do this? Thanks! Edit: To explain a bit better each keyword has an id associated with it, so {1:"olympics", 2:"sports tennis best", 3:"tennis", 4:"tennis rules"} I want to go through the list of strings/tweets and see which group of keywords match. The output should be, this tweet belongs with keyword #4. (multiple matches may be made, so anything that matches keyword 2, would also match 3 -since they both contain tennis). When there are multiple words in the keyword, e.g. "sports tennis best" they don't have to appear together but have to all appear. e.g. this will correctly match: "i just played tennis, i love sports, its the best"... since this string contains "sports tennis best" it will match and be associated with the keywordID (which is 2 for this example).

    Read the article

  • fgets in c doesn't return a portion of an string

    - by Marc
    Hi! I'm totally new in C, and I'm trying to do a little application that searches a string into a file, my problem is that I need to open a big file (more than 1GB) with just one line inside and fgets return me the entire file (I'm doing test with a 10KB file). actually this is my code: #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { char *search = argv[argc-1]; int retro = strlen(search); int pun = 0; int sortida; int limit = 10; char ara[20]; FILE *fp; if ((fp = fopen ("SEARCHFILE", "r")) == NULL){ sortida = -1; exit (1); } while(!feof(fp)){ if (fgets(ara, 20, fp) == NULL){ break; } //this must be a 20 bytes line, but it gets the entyre 10Kb file printf("%s",ara); } sortida = 1; if(fclose(fp) != 0){ sortida = -2; exit (1); } return 0; } What can I do to find an string into a file? I'v tried with GREP but it don't helps, because it returns the position:ENTIRE_STRING. I'm open to ideas. Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • fgets in c don't return a portion of an string

    - by Marc
    Hi! I'm totally new in C, and I'm trying to do a little application that searches a string into a file, my problem is that I need to open a big file (more than 1GB) with just one line inside and fgets return me the entire file (I'm doing test with a 10KB file). actually this is my code: #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { char *search = argv[argc-1]; int retro = strlen(search); int pun = 0; int sortida; int limit = 10; char ara[20]; FILE *fp; if ((fp = fopen ("SEARCHFILE", "r")) == NULL){ sortida = -1; exit (1); } while(!feof(fp)){ if (fgets(ara, 20, fp) == NULL){ break; } //this must be a 20 bytes line, but it gets the entyre 10Kb file printf("%s",ara); } sortida = 1; if(fclose(fp) != 0){ sortida = -2; exit (1); } return 0; } What can I do to find an string into a file? I'v tried with GREP but it don't helps, because it returns the position:ENTIRE_STRING. I'm open to ideas. Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Finding character in String in Vector.

    - by SoulBeaver
    Judging from the title, I kinda did my program in a fairly complicated way. BUT! I might as well ask anyway xD This is a simple program I did in response to question 3-3 of Accelerated C++, which is an awesome book in my opinion. I created a vector: vector<string> countEm; That accepts all valid strings. Therefore, I have a vector that contains elements of strings. Next, I created a function int toLowerWords( vector<string> &vec ) { for( int loop = 0; loop < vec.size(); loop++ ) transform( vec[loop].begin(), vec[loop].end(), vec[loop].begin(), ::tolower ); that splits the input into all lowercase characters for easier counting. So far, so good. I created a third and final function to actually count the words, and that's where I'm stuck. int counter( vector<string> &vec ) { for( int loop = 0; loop < vec.size(); loop++ ) for( int secLoop = 0; secLoop < vec[loop].size(); secLoop++ ) { if( vec[loop][secLoop] == ' ' ) That just looks ridiculous. Using a two-dimensional array to call on the characters of the vector until I find a space. Ridiculous. I don't believe that this is an elegant or even viable solution. If it was a viable solution, I would then backtrack from the space and copy all characters I've found in a separate vector and count those. My question then is. How can I dissect a vector of strings into separate words so that I can actually count them? I thought about using strchr, but it didn't give me any epiphanies.

    Read the article

  • binary_search not working for a vector<string>

    - by VaioIsBorn
    #include <iostream> #include <string> #include <vector> #include <algorithm> using namespace std; int main(void) { string temp; vector<string> encrypt, decrypt; int i,n, co=0; cin >> n; for(i=0;i<n;i++) { cin >> temp; encrypt.push_back(temp); } for(i=0;i<n;i++) { cin >> temp; decrypt.push_back(temp); } for(i=0;i<n;i++) { temp = encrypt[i]; if((binary_search(decrypt.begin(), decrypt.end(), temp)) == true) ++co; } cout << co << endl; return 0; } It reads two equal lists of strings and should print out how many of the words in the first list are also found in the second list, simple. Not giving me the expexted results and i think the problem is in binary_search. Can you tell me why ?

    Read the article

  • finding long repeated substrings in a massive string

    - by Will
    I naively imagined that I could build a suffix trie where I keep a visit-count for each node, and then the deepest nodes with counts greater than one are the result set I'm looking for. I have a really really long string (hundreds of megabytes). I have about 1 GB of RAM. This is why building a suffix trie with counting data is too inefficient space-wise to work for me. To quote Wikipedia's Suffix tree: storing a string's suffix tree typically requires significantly more space than storing the string itself. The large amount of information in each edge and node makes the suffix tree very expensive, consuming about ten to twenty times the memory size of the source text in good implementations. The suffix array reduces this requirement to a factor of four, and researchers have continued to find smaller indexing structures. And that was wikipedia's comments on the tree, not trie. How can I find long repeated sequences in such a large amount of data, and in a reasonable amount of time (e.g. less than an hour on a modern desktop machine)? (Some wikipedia links to avoid people posting them as the 'answer': Algorithms on strings and especially Longest repeated substring problem ;-) )

    Read the article

  • Good C string libary

    - by chamakits
    Hello all. I recently got inspired to start up a project I've been wanting to code for a while. I want to do it in C, because memory handling is key this application. I was searching around for a good implementation of strings in C, since I know me doing it myself could lead to some messy buffer overflows, and I expect to be dealing with a fairly big amount of strings. I found this article which gives details on each, but they each seem like they have a good amount of cons going for them (don't get me wrong, this article is EXTREMELY helpful, but it still worries me that even if I were to choose one of those, I wouldn't be using the best I can get). I also don't know how up to date the article is, hence my current plea. What I'm looking for is something that may hold a large amount of characters, and simplifies the process of searching through the string. If it allows me to tokenize the string in any way, even better. Also, it should have some pretty good I/O performance. Printing, and formatted printing isn't quite a top priority. I know I shouldn't expect a library to do all the work for me, but was just wandering if there was a well documented string function out there that could save me some time and some work. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance! EDIT: I was asked about the license I prefer. Any sort of open source license will do, but preferably GPL (v2 or v3). EDIt2: I found betterString (bstring) library and it looks pretty good. Good documentation, small yet versatile amount of functions, and easy to mix with c strings. Anyone have any good or bad stories about it? The only downside I've read about it is that it lacks Unicode (again, read about this, haven't seen it face to face just yet), but everything else seems pretty good. EDIT3: Also, preferable that its pure C.

    Read the article

  • Combining search button on google map and search API

    - by cheesebunz
    Basically, i have the google api search engine which will send back addresses based on the search by the user; And a map api which will go over to the selected place typed in the textbox. However, both of them are in different textboxes / buttons. i can't seem to be able to change the ids of the button to make ONE of the buttons function as two ways, which your able to get the address, and the map will move to the selected location.

    Read the article

  • rails solr search limit total search results / get fixed number of results

    - by kLeos
    I'm trying to perform a search, order the results randomly, and only return a number of results, not all matches. Something like limit(2) I've tried using the Solr param 'rows' but that doesn't seem to do anything: @featured_articles = Article.search do with(:is_featured, true) order_by :random adjust_solr_params do |params| params[:rows] = 2 end end @featured_articles.total should be 2, but it returns more than 2 How can I get a randomized fixed number of results?

    Read the article

  • Interpolating environment variables into a string in Ruby using String#scan

    - by robc
    I'm trying to interpolate environment variables into a string in Ruby and not having much luck. One of my requirements is to do something (log an error, prompt for input, whatever) if a placeholder is found in the initial string that has no matching environment variable. It looks like the block form of String#scan is what I need. Below is an irb session of my failed attempt. irb(main):014:0> raw_string = "need to replace %%FOO%% and %%BAR%% in here" => "need to replace %%FOO%% and %%BAR%% in here" irb(main):015:0> cooked_string << raw_string => "need to replace %%FOO%% and %%BAR%% in here" irb(main):016:0> raw_string.scan(/%%(.*?)%%/) do |var| irb(main):017:1* cooked_string.sub!("%%#{var}%%", ENV[var]) irb(main):018:1> done irb(main):019:1> end TypeError: cannot convert Array into String from (irb):17:in `[]' from (irb):17 from (irb):16:in `scan' from (irb):16 from :0 If I use ENV["FOO"] to manually interpolate one of those, it works fine. I'm banging my head against the desk. What am I doing wrong? Ruby is 1.8.1 on RHEL or 1.8.7 on Cygwin.

    Read the article

  • Is Google Analytics Part Of Google's Search Engine Algorithm

    - by ub3rst4r
    I was wondering if anyone knows if Google uses the data it receives from Google Analytics to help determine a websites SERP (Search Engine Rank Position). For example, if my website is getting 1000 users visiting my website from Canada and only 100 users visiting my website from the USA, does that mean my website will be ranked higher on Google.ca and lower on Google.com? And, if a website is using Google Analytics will it be ranked higher for the organic search engine keywords?

    Read the article

  • No search data in Google Analytics or Webmasters

    - by cjk
    I have a domain that has been registered in Google Webmasters and using Google Analytics for over 4 months. I get lots of analytics data, but am getting no information on Google searches in Webmasters, or Queries in Search Engine Optimisation in Analytics, even though I am getting keywords for traffic coming to my site from search engines. I have a test sub-domain with the same setup (except not HTTPS) that is getting some of this information through, even with much less data and visits. What could be wrong to stop me getting this information?

    Read the article

  • No search data in Goolge Analytics or Webmasters

    - by cjk
    I have a domain that has been registered in Google Webmasters and using Google Analytics for over 4 months. I get lots of analytics data, but am getting no information on Google searches in Webmasters, or Queries in Search Engine Optimisation in Analytics, even though I am getting keywords for traffic coming to my site from search engines. I have a test sub-domain with the same setup (except not HTTPS) that is getting some of this information through, even with much less data and visits. What could be wrong to stop me getting this information?

    Read the article

  • How do search engines segment against locale?

    - by Hope I Helped
    Assume I run a website with multiple language modes. If I had a Spanish section, it should be included in Spanish-segmented search engines such as Google Spain, Google Peru, Google El Salvador, etc. and excluded in the others. Likewise, even though the website would have content in Chinese, multilingual countries such as Singapore should feature content in their main language (English in this case). What is the best approach to ensure the appropriate language is associated with the various geographically segmented search engines?

    Read the article

  • Kickoff and Krunner to search with less than 3 chars in search field?

    - by Benjamin
    Both Krunner and Kickoff in Kubuntu return a list of found items after the user has entered at least three characters in the search field. Usage on Synapse shows that returning a list after one character onwards is faster and efficient. I would like Kickoff and Krunner to behave similarly, by making the return a list of items after entering the first character in their search field. How can I achieve that?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19  | Next Page >