nested class - Page 127

Abstract attributes in Python

- by deamon

What is the shortest / most elegant way to implement the following Scala code with an abstract attribute in Python? abstract class Controller { val path: String } A subclass of Controller is enforced to define "path" by the Scala compiler. A subclass would look like this: class MyController extends Controller { override val path = "/home" }

Read the article

Python and classes

- by Artyom

Hello, i have 2 classes. How i call first.TQ in Second ? Without creating object First in Second. class First: def __init__(self): self.str = "" def TQ(self): pass def main(self): T = Second(self.str) # Called here class Second(): def __init__(self): list = {u"RANDINT":first.TQ} # List of funcs maybe called in first ..... ..... return data

Read the article

Need help with copy constructor for very basic implementation of singly linked lists

- by Jesus

Last week, we created a program that manages sets of strings, using classes and vectors. I was able to complete this 100%. This week, we have to replace the vector we used to store strings in our class with simple singly linked lists. The function basically allows users to declare sets of strings that are empty, and sets with only one element. In the main file, there is a vector whose elements are a struct that contain setName and strSet (class). HERE IS MY PROBLEM: It deals with the copy constructor of the class. When I remove/comment out the copy constructor, I can declare as many empty or single sets as I want, and output their values without a problem. But I know I will obviously need the copy constructor for when I implement the rest of the program. When I leave the copy constructor in, I can declare one set, either single or empty, and output its value. But if I declare a 2nd set, and i try to output either of the first two sets, i get a Segmentation Fault. Moreover, if i try to declare more then 2 sets, I get a Segmentation Fault. Any help would be appreciated!! Here is my code for a very basic implementation of everything: Here is the setcalc.cpp: (main file) #include <iostream> #include <cctype> #include <cstring> #include <string> #include "help.h" #include "strset2.h" using namespace std; // Declares of structure to hold all the sets defined struct setsOfStr { string nameOfSet; strSet stringSet; }; // Checks if the set name inputted is unique bool isSetNameUnique( vector<setsOfStr> strSetArr, string setName) { for(unsigned int i = 0; i < strSetArr.size(); i++) { if( strSetArr[i].nameOfSet == setName ) { return false; } } return true; } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { char commandChoice; // Declares a vector with our declared structure as the type vector<setsOfStr> strSetVec; string setName; string singleEle; // Sets a loop that will constantly ask for a command until 'q' is typed while (1) { // declaring a set to be empty if(commandChoice == 'd') { cin >> setName; // Check that the set name inputted is unique if (isSetNameUnique(strSetVec, setName) == true) { strSet emptyStrSet; setsOfStr set1; set1.nameOfSet = setName; set1.stringSet = emptyStrSet; strSetVec.push_back(set1); } else { cerr << "ERROR: Re-declaration of set '" << setName << "'\n"; } } // declaring a set to be a singleton else if(commandChoice == 's') { cin >> setName; cin >> singleEle; // Check that the set name inputted is unique if (isSetNameUnique(strSetVec, setName) == true) { strSet singleStrSet(singleEle); setsOfStr set2; set2.nameOfSet = setName; set2.stringSet = singleStrSet; strSetVec.push_back(set2); } else { cerr << "ERROR: Re-declaration of set '" << setName << "'\n"; } } // using the output function else if(commandChoice == 'o') { cin >> setName; if(isSetNameUnique(strSetVec, setName) == false) { // loop through until the set name is matched and call output on its strSet for(unsigned int k = 0; k < strSetVec.size(); k++) { if( strSetVec[k].nameOfSet == setName ) { (strSetVec[k].stringSet).output(); } } } else { cerr << "ERROR: No such set '" << setName << "'\n"; } } // quitting else if(commandChoice == 'q') { break; } else { cerr << "ERROR: Ignoring bad command: '" << commandChoice << "'\n"; } } return 0; } Here is the strSet2.h: #ifndef _STRSET_ #define _STRSET_ #include <iostream> #include <vector> #include <string> struct node { std::string s1; node * next; }; class strSet { private: node * first; public: strSet (); // Create empty set strSet (std::string s); // Create singleton set strSet (const strSet &copy); // Copy constructor // will implement destructor later void output() const; strSet& operator = (const strSet& rtSide); // Assignment }; // End of strSet class #endif // _STRSET_ And here is the strSet2.cpp (implementation of class) #include <iostream> #include <vector> #include <string> #include "strset2.h" using namespace std; strSet::strSet() { first = NULL; } strSet::strSet(string s) { node *temp; temp = new node; temp->s1 = s; temp->next = NULL; first = temp; } strSet::strSet(const strSet& copy) { cout << "copy-cst\n"; node *n = copy.first; node *prev = NULL; while (n) { node *newNode = new node; newNode->s1 = n->s1; newNode->next = NULL; if (prev) { prev->next = newNode; } else { first = newNode; } prev = newNode; n = n->next; } } void strSet::output() const { if(first == NULL) { cout << "Empty set\n"; } else { node *temp; temp = first; while(1) { cout << temp->s1 << endl; if(temp->next == NULL) break; temp = temp->next; } } } strSet& strSet::operator = (const strSet& rtSide) { first = rtSide.first; return *this; }

Read the article

How to prevent inheritance for some methods?!

- by Dr TJ

Hi How can I prevent inheritance of some methods or properties in derived classes?! public class BaseClass : Collection { //Some operations... //Should not let derived classes inherit 'Add' method. } public class DerivedClass : BaseClass { public void DoSomething(int Item) { this.Add(Item); // Error: No such method should exist... } }

Read the article

How can I create a list of classes in C# to iterate over in a loop

- by Jean-Bernard Pellerin

Suppose I have class animal and classes cat and dog extending it. I want to do something along the lines of: foreach (animal a in {cat, dog}) if (a.isValid(parameters)) doStuff(); My only alternative is a switch statement for each class, something I'd like to avoid. Thanks, J-B

Read the article

Java loading user-specified classes at runtime

- by user349043

I'm working on robot simulation in Java (a Swing application). I have an abstract class "Robot" from which different types of Robots are derived, e.g. public class StupidRobot extends Robot { int m_stupidness; int m_insanityLevel; ... } public class AngryRobot extends Robot { float m_aggression; ... } As you can see, each Robot subclass has a different set of parameters. What I would like to do is control the simulation setup in the initial UI. Choose the number and type of Robots, give it a name, fill in the parameters etc. This is one of those times where being such a dinosaur programmer, and new to Java, I wonder if there is some higher level stuff/thinking that could help me here. So here is what I've got: (1) User Interface Scrolling list of Robot types on the left. "Add " and "<< Remove" buttons in the middle. Default-named scrolling list of Robots on the right. "Set Parameters" button underneath. (So if you wanted an AngryRobot, you'd select AngryRobot on the left list, click "Add" and "AngryRobot1" would show up on the right.) When selecting a Robot on the right, click "Set Parameters..." button which would call yet another model dialog where you'd fill in the parameters. Different dialog called for each Robot type. (2) Data structures an implementation As an end-product I think a HashMap would be most convenient. The keys would be Robot types and the accompanying object would be all of the parameters. The initializer could just retrieve each item one and a time and instantiate. Here's what the data structures would look like: enum ROBOT_TYPE {STUPID, ANGRY, etc} public class RobotInitializer { public ROBOT_TYPE m_type; public string m_name; public int[] m_int_params; public float[] m_float_params; etc. The initializer's constructor would create the appropriate length parameter arrays based on the type: public RobotInitializer(ROBOT_TYPE type, int[] int_array, float[] float_array, etc){ switch (type){ case STUPID: m_int_params = new int[STUPID_INT_PARAM_LENGTH]; System.arraycopy(int_array,0,m_int_params,0,STUPID_INT_PARAM_LENGTH); etc. Once all the RobotInitializers are instantiated, they are added to the HashMap. Iterating through the HashMap, the simulation initializer takes items from the Hashmap and instantiates the appropriate Robots. Is this reasonable? If not, how can it be improved? Thanks

Read the article

Python, invoke super constructor

- by Mike

class A: def __init__(self): print "world" class B(A): def __init__(self): print "hello" B() hello In all other languages I've worked with the super constructor is invoked implicitly. How does one invoke it in Python? I would expect super(self) but this doesn't work

Read the article

error with passing my object with serializable?

- by Jony Scherman

i was trying to send my object class GastronomyElement to another activity but i have got this error java.lang.RuntimeException: Parcelable encountered IOException writing serializable object (name = com.example.despegarteproject.classes.GastronomyElement) i have seen another posts like this but i couldn not solve it. this is my class code public class GastronomyElement implements Serializable { String id, name, formattedAddress, formattedPhoneNumber, reference, photo; List<String> photos; Boolean openNow; Horarios horarios; List<Review> reviews; String priceLevel; double latitude, longitude; Double rating; public String getName () { return name; } public void setName (String name) { this.name = name; } public String getId () { return id; } public void setId (String id) { this.id = id; } public String getFormattedAddress () { return formattedAddress; } public void setFormattedAddress (String formattedAddress) { this.formattedAddress = formattedAddress; } public String getReference () { return reference; } public void setReference (String reference) { this.reference = reference; } public String getPhoto () { return photo; } public void setPhoto (String photo) { this.photo = photo; } public List<String> getPhotos () { return photos; } public void setPhotos (List<String> photos) { this.photos = photos; } public double getLatitude() { return latitude; } public void setLatitude (double latitude) { this.latitude = latitude; } public double getLongitude() { return longitude; } public void setLongitude (double longitude) { this.longitude = longitude; } public Double getRating () { return rating; } public void setRating (Double rating) { this.rating = rating; } public Boolean getOpenNow () { return openNow; } public void setOpenNow (Boolean openNow) { this.openNow = openNow; } public Horarios getHorarios () { return horarios; } public void setHorarios (Horarios horarios) { this.horarios = horarios; } public String getPriceLevel () { return priceLevel; } public void setPriceLevel (String priceLevel) { this.priceLevel = priceLevel; } public String getFormattedPhoneNumber () { return formattedPhoneNumber; } public void setFormattedPhoneNumber (String formattedPhoneNumber) { this.formattedPhoneNumber = formattedPhoneNumber; } public List<Review> getReviews () { return reviews; } public void setReviews (List<Review> reviews) { this.reviews = reviews; } } and this is how i am sending it Intent act = new Intent (context, ActivityLugarDetalles.class); act.putExtra("elementDetails", elementDetails); startActivity(act); i would appreciate your help! thank you!

Read the article

How to implement this feature in javascript ? Make uncertain , divorce, the wife say!

- by Kuiyou Li

In the Javascript, could I define a class, the class itself can also when a function call, similar to the index, such as: function A() { } var a=new A(); var v=a(); //Use ordinary/like Javascript function use

Read the article

Checking method visibility in PHP

- by phobia

Is there any way of checking if a class method has been declared as private or public? I'm working on a controller where the url is mapped to methods in the class, and I only want to trigger the methods if they are defined as public.

Read the article

loading method based on URL

- by steeped

I am trying to build a small mvc-based application. How do I call a method in a class based on a query string? For example, the $_GET query string is being set as load_master_form http://www.domain.com/settings/load_master_form And to call the method within the settings class, I am doing: function __construct(){ $this->{$_GET['method']}(); } But obviously that doesn't work - it just isn't possible to load a method like that. So how would it be done?

Read the article

How to use length indicator in a C++ program

- by cj

I want to make a program in C++ that reads a file where each field will have a number before it that indicates how long it is. The problem is I read every record in object of a class; how do I make the attributes of the class dynamic? For example if the field is "john" it will read it in a 4 char array. I don't want to make an array of 1000 elements as minimum memory usage is very important.

Read the article

Send a variable on the heap to another thread

- by user1201889

I have a strange problem in C++. An address of a Boolean gets "destroyed" but it doesn't get touched. I know that there are beater way's to accomplish what I try to do, but I want to know what I do wrong. I have a main class; this main class contains a vector of another class. There is a strange problem when a new instance gets created of this object. This is how my code works: There will start a thread when the constructor gets called of the “2nd”object. This thread gets as Parameter a struct. This is the struct: struct KeyPressData { vector<bool> *AutoPressStatus; vector<int> *AutoPressTime; bool * Destroy; bool * Ready; }; The struct gets filled in the constructor: MultiBoxClient::MultiBoxClient() { //init data DestroyThread = new bool; ReadyThread = new bool; AutoThreadData = new KeyPressData; //Reseting data *DestroyThread = false; *ReadyThread = false; //KeyPressData configurating AutoThreadData->AutoPressStatus = &AutoPressStatus; AutoThreadData->AutoPressTime = &AutoPressTime; AutoThreadData->Destroy = DestroyThread; AutoThreadData->Ready = ReadyThread; //Start the keypress thread CreateThread(NULL,NULL,(LPTHREAD_START_ROUTINE)AutoKeyThread,AutoThreadData,NULL,NULL); } As long as the constructor is running will the program run fine. But when the constructor closes the address of the “AutoThreadData-Destroy” will get corrupted. The program will crash when I call the value of the pointer. void WINAPI AutoKeyThread(void * ThreadData) { KeyPressData * AutoThreadData = (KeyPressData*)ThreadData; while(true) { if(*AutoThreadData->Destroy == true) //CRASH { *AutoThreadData->Ready = true; return; } Sleep(100); } } What did I test: I logged the address of the AutoThreadData and the AutoThreadData-Destroy when the constrcutor is running and clossed; the AutoThreadData address is equal to AutoThreadData when the constructor is closed. So there is no problem here. The address of AutoThreadData-Destroy gets destroyed when the constructor is closed. But how can this happen? The Boolean is on the heap and the KeyPressData struct (AutoThreadData) is on the heap. Destroy before: 00A85328 Destroy after: FEEEFEEE Can someone maby explain why this crash? I know that I can send a pointer to my class to the thread. But I want to know what goes wrong here. That way I can learn from my mistakes. Could someone help me with this problem? Thanks!

Read the article

jQuery's attr - return multiple classes not just the 1st.

- by nobosh

Given a div such as: <div class="widget block dock clock">yada yada</div> I'd like to be abe to use JQUERY's $(div).attr('class'); to find all the classes, but the JQUERY.attr only return widget. Is there a way with JQUERY to return all the classes defined for the element? Thanks

Read the article

Catch requests to non-existent classes (not autoload)

- by Spot

Is there a manner in which to catch requests to a class which does not exist. I'm looking for something exactly like __call() and __static(), but for classes as opposed to methods in a class. I am not talking about autoloading. I need to be able to interrupt the request and reroute it. Ideas?

Read the article

purpose of php consutructor

- by Bharanikumar

Hi , Am working in the classes and object class structure , but not extream level , Just class and function , then in one place instantiation . that's it , not much big functions like __construct etc , Please tell me very simply , 1.what is th purpose of constructor ad destructor , But i know theoretical explanation school level , But i am expecting something like in real time , which situation we have to use, and is there any example for that please tell me, Regards

Read the article

Best practice for referring to classes in CSS

- by Mark Szymanski

If you have an HTML page with a class in an element, for instance <div class="myClass"> would it be best to refer to it in the CSS as .myClass or div.myClass? Thanks in advance!

Read the article

Accessing variables in other classes (Java)

- by George

Why doesn't the following program return 0, since I am accessing p from a new A(), which has not had main called on it? public class A { public int p = 0; public static void main(String[] args) { p = Integer.parseInt(args[0]); new B().go(); } } class B { public void go() { System.out.println(new A().p); } }

Read the article

Problem with C++ classes

- by Mike

I have a class defined called extBlock. I then make an instance of that class with this extBlock mainBlock = new extBlock(1, 1024); I get this error: error C2440: 'initializing' : cannot convert from 'extBlock *' to 'extBlock' Can anyone help me with why I am getting this error. I have seen examples online of declaring it like this with a pointer extBlock *mainBlock = new extBlock(1, 1024); But if I do it this way it does not let me call the functions of mainBlock

Read the article

What does @@variable mean in Ruby?

- by Andrew

What are Ruby variables preceded with double at signs (@@)? My understanding of a variable preceded with an at sign is that it is an instance variable, like this in PHP: PHP version class Person { public $name; public function setName($name) { $this->name = $name; } public function getName() { return $this->name; } } Ruby equivalent class Person def set_name(name) @name = name end def get_name() @name end end What does the double at sign @@ mean, and how does it differ from a single at sign?

Read the article

Live Wallpaper Engine Abstraction

- by user1459142

I am trying to obtain an instance of my live wallpaper engine in another class, here is my code... In the other class: WallpaperEngine wpe = (WallpaperEngine) LiveWallpaperService.onCreateEngine(); In LiveWallpaperService: @Override public Engine onCreateEngine() { // TODO Auto-generated method stub return new WallpaperEngine(); } But when I refer to an object in my engine (i.e, "wpe.variable"), I get a NullPointerException and the wallpaper force closes.

Read the article

How to name a static factory method in the utility class?

- by leventov

I have an interface MyLongNameInterface with a counterpart utility class MyLongNameInterfaces. What is the best name for a static factory method in the utility class, which creates an instance of MyLongNameInterface? MyLongNameInterfaces.newInstance() -- a new instance of the utility class? MyLongNameInterfaces.newMyLongNameInterface() -- too verbose MyLongNameInterfaces.create() -- create an instance of the utility class? Also, create is not a widely used conventional verb in Java better option?

Read the article

Should I create inner class here or leave as is?

- by AndroidNoob

Folks, I have two separate classes. One of them makes http requests/receives response to/from a server and the second one converts received JSON objects into my models (separate classes). I'm thinking it would be an idea to include this class for data converting as an inner class of my first class. Wouldn't my first class be extra big because of it and I need to leave everything as is or this is a good common practice to behave like that?

Read the article

Is it possible to run an ng-switch directly on a select > option

- by Asok

Has anyone been able to run an ng-switch on a <select> -> <option> tag, like so?: <select ng-model="form.permitLocality" ng-switch on="localityTypeRadio"> <option ng-switch-when="County" ng-repeat="county in countyList"> {{ county.name }} </option> <option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList"> {{ city.name }} </option> <option ng-switch-when="Town" ng-repeat="town in townList"> {{ town.name }} </option> </select> I am not getting any errors or any options (all values verified), I just thought it would save me a couple lines and thought I'd try it. Here is my selector, in case you're curious (value verified): <label class="radio inline"> <input type="radio" name="localityTypeRadio" ng-model="localityTypeRadio" value="County"> County </label> <label class="radio inline"> <input type="radio" name="localityTypeRadio" ng-model="localityTypeRadio" value="City"> City </label> <label class="radio inline"> <input type="radio" name="localityTypeRadio" ng-model="localityTypeRadio" value="Town"> Town </label> This is not a big deal, just didn't know if this was a limitation / not recommended with an ng-switch EDIT I was mistaken when I initially said that nothing was happening (browser caching), there appears to be the correct number of options but the source code shows nothing but white space: <select ng-model="form.permitLocality" class="input-block-level ng-pristine ng-valid" ng-switch="" on="localityTypeRadio" ng-hide="form.permitLocality.length"><option value="? string: ?"></option>  <option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option><option ng-switch-when="City" ng-repeat="city in cityList" class="ng-scope ng-binding" value=" "> </option>  </select>

Read the article

Javascript toggle using custom attributes

- by Jacob

Can't seem to get this to work for me, can anyone offer me some help? http://codepen.io/anon/pen/kABjC This should open and close a section of text based on click, it takes the ID # which is just a digit (1,2,3,4,etc) and using that id targets an id to open and close the section. Javascript $(document).ready(function(){ $('.classclick').click(function(){ $('#class'+$(this).Attr('data-id')+"show").show(400); }); }); HTML <div class="classes"> <?php foreach ($classes as $class): ?> <div class="class"> <div class="classclick" data-id="<?=$class['cid']?>"> <div class="class-title"> <?=$class['className']?> </div> <div class="class-intensity"> Intensity: <?=$class['classIntensity']?> </div> </div> <div class="class-show hidden" id="class<?=$class['cid']?>show"> <div class="class-inner-content"> <div class="two-thirds"> <?=$class['classDesc']?> </div> <div class="one-third"> Things To Know: asdfasd asdf afsdadfs fsda dfsa dfsadfsa </div> </div> </div> </div> <?php endforeach; ?> </div>

Search Results

Search found 46897 results on 1876 pages for 'nested class'.

Page 127/1876 | < Previous Page | 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 | Next Page >

- by deamon

- by Artyom

- by Jesus

- by Dr TJ

- by Jean-Bernard Pellerin

- by user349043

- by Mike

- by Jony Scherman

- by Kuiyou Li

- by phobia

- by steeped

- by cj

- by user1201889

- by nobosh

- by Spot

- by Bharanikumar

- by Mark Szymanski

- by George

- by Mike

- by Andrew

- by user1459142

- by leventov

- by AndroidNoob

- by Asok

- by Jacob

< Previous Page | 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 | Next Page >