Search Results

Search found 26133 results on 1046 pages for 'asp mvc'.

Page 13/1046 | < Previous Page | 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20  | Next Page >

  • ASP.NET MVC 3 Hosting :: Rolling with Razor in MVC v3 Preview

    - by mbridge
    Razor is an alternate view engine for asp.net MVC.  It was introduced in the “WebMatrix” tool and has now been released as part of the asp.net MVC 3 preview 1.  Basically, Razor allows us to replace the clunky <% %> syntax with a much cleaner coding model, which integrates very nicely with HTML.  Additionally, it provides some really nice features for master page type scenarios and you don’t lose access to any of the features you are currently familiar with, such as HTML helper methods. First, download and install the ASP.NET MVC Preview 1.  You can find this at http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=cb42f741-8fb1-4f43-a5fa-812096f8d1e8&displaylang=en. Now, follow these steps to create your first asp.net mvc project using Razor: 1. Open Visual Studio 2010 2. Create a new project.  Select File->New->Project (Shift Control N) 3. You will see the list of project types which should look similar to what’s shown:   4. Select “ASP.NET MVC 3 Web Application (Razor).”  Set the application name to RazorTest and the path to c:projectsRazorTest for this tutorial. If you select accidently select ASPX, you will end up with the standard asp.net view engine and template, which isn’t what you want. 5. For this tutorial, and ONLY for this tutorial, select “No, do not create a unit test project.”  In general, you should create and use a unit test project.  Code without unit tests is kind of like diet ice cream.  It just isn’t very good. Now, once we have this done, our brand new project will be created.    In all likelihood, Visual Studio will leave you looking at the “HomeController.cs” class, as shown below: Immediately, you should notice one difference.  The Index action used to look like: public ActionResult Index () { ViewData[“Message”] = “Welcome to ASP.Net MVC!”; Return View(); } While this will still compile and run just fine, ASP.Net MVC 3 has a much nicer way of doing this: public ActionResult Index() { ViewModel.Message = “Welcome to ASP.Net MVC!”; Return View(); } Instead of using ViewData we are using the new ViewModel object, which uses the new dynamic data typing of .Net 4.0 to allow us to express ourselves much more cleanly.  This isn’t a tutorial on ALL of MVC 3, but the ViewModel concept is one we will need as we dig into Razor. What comes in the box? When we create a project using the ASP.Net MVC 3 Template with Razor, we get a standard project setup, just like we did in ASP.NET MVC 2.0 but with some differences.  Instead of seeing “.aspx” view files and “.ascx” files, we see files with the “.cshtml” which is the default razor extension.  Before we discuss the details of a razor file, one thing to keep in mind is that since this is an extremely early preview, intellisense is not currently enabled with the razor view engine.  This is promised as an updated before the final release.  Just like with the aspx view engine, the convention of the folder name for a set of views matching the controller name without the word “Controller” still stands.  Similarly, each action in the controller will usually have a corresponding view file in the appropriate view directory.  Remember, in asp.net MVC, convention over configuration is key to successful development! The initial template organizes views in the following folders, located in the project under Views: - Account – The default account management views used by the Account controller.  Each file represents a distinct view. - Home – Views corresponding to the appropriate actions within the home controller. - Shared – This contains common view objects used by multiple views.  Within here, master pages are stored, as well as partial page views (user controls).  By convention, these partial views are named “_XXXPartial.cshtml” where XXX is the appropriate name, such as _LogonPartial.cshtml.  Additionally, display templates are stored under here. With this in mind, let us take a look at the index.cshtml file under the home view directory.  When you open up index.cshtml you should see 1:   @inherits System.Web.Mvc.WebViewPage 2:  @{ 3:          View.Title = "Home Page"; 4:       LayoutPage = "~/Views/Shared/_Layout.cshtml"; 5:   } 6:  <h2>@View.Message</h2> 7:  <p> 8:     To learn more about ASP.NET MVC visit <a href="http://asp.net/mvc" title="ASP.NET MVC     9:    Website">http://asp.net/mvc</a>. 10:  </p> So looking through this, we observe the following facts: Line 1 imports the base page that all views (using Razor) are based on, which is System.Web.Mvc.WebViewPage.  Note that this is different than System.Web.MVC.ViewPage which is used by asp.net MVC 2.0 Also note that instead of the <% %> syntax, we use the very simple ‘@’ sign.  The View Engine contains enough context sensitive logic that it can even distinguish between @ in code and @ in an email.  It’s a very clean markup.  Line 2 introduces the idea of a code block in razor.  A code block is a scoping mechanism just like it is in a normal C# class.  It is designated by @{… }  and any C# code can be placed in between.  Note that this is all server side code just like it is when using the aspx engine and <% %>.  Line 3 allows us to set the page title in the client page’s file.  This is a new feature which I’ll talk more about when we get to master pages, but it is another of the nice things razor brings to asp.net mvc development. Line 4 is where we specify our “master” page, but as you can see, you can place it almost anywhere you want, because you tell it where it is located.  A Layout Page is similar to a master page, but it gains a bit when it comes to flexibility.  Again, we’ll come back to this in a later installment.  Line 6 and beyond is where we display the contents of our view.  No more using <%: %> intermixed with code.  Instead, we get to use very clean syntax such as @View.Message.  This is a lot easier to read than <%:@View.Message%> especially when intermixed with html.  For example: <p> My name is @View.Name and I live at @View.Address </p> Compare this to the equivalent using the aspx view engine <p> My name is <%:View.Name %> and I live at <%: View.Address %> </p> While not an earth shaking simplification, it is easier on the eyes.  As  we explore other features, this clean markup will become more and more valuable.

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET Membership Provider Setup

    - by Ben Griswold
    In this screencast, Noah and I show you how to quickly get started with the ASP.NET Membership Provider.  We’ll take you through basic features and setup and walk you through membership table creation with the ASP.NET SQL Server Wizard. I’ve written about the ASP.NET Membership Provider and setup before.  If you missed the post, this introductory video may be for you.     This is one of our first screencasts.  If you have feedback, I’d love to hear it.

    Read the article

  • JavaScript JSON Error While Tabbing in ASP.NET MVC

    - by MightyZot
    Originally posted on: http://geekswithblogs.net/MightyZot/archive/2013/11/11/javascript-json-error-while-tabbing-in-asp.net-mvc.aspxI sometimes don’t care about validation for a specific control. The RememberMe control in the login form, for example, really doesn’t need validation, so I forget to include the Html.ValidationMessageFor helper line for that control in particular. As a result, when I’m debugging using IE, I get a silly JSON parsing exception when changing focus from one field to another. The exception doesn’t hurt anything, as far as I know, but it’s just plain annoying. If you’re getting this error, and you don’t want validation messages showing up for controls on a form, you can put them in div tags and set the display style on the divs to none. When I have a handful of controls that I don’t want the validation messages for, I just throw them all in the same div and hide it.

    Read the article

  • Business Logic Layer in MVC Application

    - by Subin Jacob
    In my ASP MVC application I decided to add another Business Layer and made the model only to have properties. All other functionality like save to db, get from db is done on this new Business layer. So now the controller will be calling this business layer and model for various operations. Is it a good approach to design like this? I decided not to use model for this purpose because I would need a number of models for different actions. (for eg, one for edit and other for create)

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET in Moscow!

    - by Latest Microsoft Blogs
    I’m traveling to Russia and speaking in Moscow next week at the DevConf. This will be the first time that I have visited Russia, and I know that there is a strong ASP.NET community in Russia, so I am very excited about the trip. I’m speaking at the DevConf Read More......(read more)

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC 2 client-side validation rules not being created

    - by Brant Bobby
    MVC isn't generating the client-side validation rules for my viewmodel. The HTML just contains this: <script type="text/javascript"> //<![CDATA[ if (!window.mvcClientValidationMetadata) { window.mvcClientValidationMetadata = []; } window.mvcClientValidationMetadata.push({"Fields":[],"FormId":"form0","ReplaceValidationSummary":false}); //]]> </script> Note that Fields[] is empty! My view is strongly-typed and uses the new strongly-typed HTML helpers (TextBoxFor(), etc). View Model / Domain Model public class ItemFormViewModel { public Item Item { get; set; } [Required] [StringLength(100)] public string Whatever { get; set; } // for demo } [MetadataType(typeof(ItemMetadata))] public class Item { public string Name { get; set; } public string SKU { get; set; } public int QuantityRequired { get; set; } // etc. } public class ItemMetadata { [Required] [StringLength(100)] public string Name { get; set; } [Required] [StringLength(50)] public string SKU { get; set; } [Range(0, Int32.MaxValue)] public int QuantityRequired { get; set; } // etc. } (I know I'm using a domain model as my / as part of my view model, which isn't a good practice, but disregard that for now.) View <%@ Page Language="C#" MasterPageFile="~/Views/Shared/Site.Master" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewPage<ItemFormViewModel>" %> <asp:Content ID="Content2" ContentPlaceHolderID="MainContent" runat="server"> <h2>Editing item: <%= Html.Encode(Model.Item.Name) %></h2> <% Html.EnableClientValidation(); %> <%= Html.ValidationSummary("Could not save the item.") %> <% using (Html.BeginForm()) { %> <%= Html.TextBoxFor(model => model.Item.Name) %> <%= Html.TextBoxFor(model => model.Item.SKU) %> <%= Html.TextBoxFor(model => model.Item.QuantityRequired) %> <%= Html.HiddenFor(model => model.Item.ItemID) %> <%= Html.TextBox("Whatever", Model.Whatever) %> <input type="submit" value="Save" /> <% } %> </asp:Content> I included the Whatever property on the view model because I suspected that MVC wasn't recursively inspecting the sub-properties of ItemFormViewModel.Item, but even that isn't being validated? I've even tried delving into the MVC framework source code but have come up empty. What could be going on?

    Read the article

  • Fix: Orchard Error ‘The controller for path '/OrchardLocal/' was not found or does not implement IController.

    - by Ken Cox [MVP]
    Suddenly, in a local Orchard 1.6 project, I started getting this error in ShellRoute.cs: The controller for path '/OrchardLocal/' was not found or does not implement IController. Obviously I had changed something, but the error wasn’t helping much.  After losing far too much time, I copied over the original Orchard source code and was back in business. Shortly thereafter, I further flattened my forehead by applying a sudden, solid blow with the lower portion of my palm! You see, in testing the importing of comments via blogML, I had set the added blog as the Orchard site’s Start page. Then, I deleted the blog so I could test another import batch. The upshot was that by deleting the blog, Orchard no longer had a default (home) page at the root of the site. The site’s default content was missing. The fix was to go to the Admin subdirectory (http://localhost:30320/OrchardLocal/admin) . add a new page, and check Set as homepage. Once again, the problem was between the keyboard and the chair. I hope this helps someone else. Ken

    Read the article

  • DropDownList and SelectListItem Array Item Updates in MVC

    - by Rick Strahl
    So I ran into an interesting behavior today as I deployed my first MVC 4 app tonight. I have a list form that has a filter drop down that allows selection of categories. This list is static and rarely changes so rather than loading these items from the database each time I load the items once and then cache the actual SelectListItem[] array in a static property. However, when we put the site online tonight we immediately noticed that the drop down list was coming up with pre-set values that randomly changed. Didn't take me long to trace this back to the cached list of SelectListItem[]. Clearly the list was getting updated - apparently through the model binding process in the selection postback. To clarify the scenario here's the drop down list definition in the Razor View:@Html.DropDownListFor(mod => mod.QueryParameters.Category, Model.CategoryList, "All Categories") where Model.CategoryList gets set with:[HttpPost] [CompressContent] public ActionResult List(MessageListViewModel model) { InitializeViewModel(model); busEntry entryBus = new busEntry(); var entries = entryBus.GetEntryList(model.QueryParameters); model.Entries = entries; model.DisplayMode = ApplicationDisplayModes.Standard; model.CategoryList = AppUtils.GetCachedCategoryList(); return View(model); } The AppUtils.GetCachedCategoryList() method gets the cached list or loads the list on the first access. The code to load up the list is housed in a Web utility class. The method looks like this:/// <summary> /// Returns a static category list that is cached /// </summary> /// <returns></returns> public static SelectListItem[] GetCachedCategoryList() { if (_CategoryList != null) return _CategoryList; lock (_SyncLock) { if (_CategoryList != null) return _CategoryList; var catBus = new busCategory(); var categories = catBus.GetCategories().ToList(); // Turn list into a SelectItem list var catList= categories .Select(cat => new SelectListItem() { Text = cat.Name, Value = cat.Id.ToString() }) .ToList(); catList.Insert(0, new SelectListItem() { Value = ((int)SpecialCategories.AllCategoriesButRealEstate).ToString(), Text = "All Categories except Real Estate" }); catList.Insert(1, new SelectListItem() { Value = "-1", Text = "--------------------------------" }); _CategoryList = catList.ToArray(); } return _CategoryList; } private static SelectListItem[] _CategoryList ; This seemed normal enough to me - I've been doing stuff like this forever caching smallish lists in memory to avoid an extra trip to the database. This list is used in various places throughout the application - for the list display and also when adding new items and setting up for notifications etc.. Watch that ModelBinder! However, it turns out that this code is clearly causing a problem. It appears that the model binder on the [HttpPost] method is actually updating the list that's bound to and changing the actual entry item in the list and setting its selected value. If you look at the code above I'm not setting the SelectListItem.Selected value anywhere - the only place this value can get set is through ModelBinding. Sure enough when stepping through the code I see that when an item is selected the actual model - model.CategoryList[x].Selected - reflects that. This is bad on several levels: First it's obviously affecting the application behavior - nobody wants to see their drop down list values jump all over the place randomly. But it's also a problem because the array is getting updated by multiple ASP.NET threads which likely would lead to odd crashes from time to time. Not good! In retrospect the modelbinding behavior makes perfect sense. The actual items and the Selected property is the ModelBinder's way of keeping track of one or more selected values. So while I assumed the list to be read-only, the ModelBinder is actually updating it on a post back producing the rather surprising results. Totally missed this during testing and is another one of those little - "Did you know?" moments. So, is there a way around this? Yes but it's maybe not quite obvious. I can't change the behavior of the ModelBinder, but I can certainly change the way that the list is generated. Rather than returning the cached list, I can return a brand new cloned list from the cached items like this:/// <summary> /// Returns a static category list that is cached /// </summary> /// <returns></returns> public static SelectListItem[] GetCachedCategoryList() { if (_CategoryList != null) { // Have to create new instances via projection // to avoid ModelBinding updates to affect this // globally return _CategoryList .Select(cat => new SelectListItem() { Value = cat.Value, Text = cat.Text }) .ToArray(); } …}  The key is that newly created instances of SelectListItems are returned not just filtered instances of the original list. The key here is 'new instances' so that the ModelBinding updates do not update the actual static instance. The code above uses LINQ and a projection into new SelectListItem instances to create this array of fresh instances. And this code works correctly - no more cross-talk between users. Unfortunately this code is also less efficient - it has to reselect the items and uses extra memory for the new array. Knowing what I know now I probably would have not cached the list and just take the hit to read from the database. If there is even a possibility of thread clashes I'm very wary of creating code like this. But since the method already exists and handles this load in one place this fix was easy enough to put in. Live and learn. It's little things like this that can cause some interesting head scratchers sometimes…© Rick Strahl, West Wind Technologies, 2005-2012Posted in MVC  ASP.NET  .NET   Tweet !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs"); (function() { var po = document.createElement('script'); po.type = 'text/javascript'; po.async = true; po.src = 'https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(po, s); })();

    Read the article

  • ASP.Net MVC per area membership

    - by AdmSteck
    I am building an ASP.Net MVC app that will run on a shared hosting account to host multiple domains. I started with the default template that includes membership and created an mvc area for each domain. Routing is set up to point to the correct area depending on the domain the request is for. Now I would like to set up membership specific to each mvc area. I tried the obvious first and attempted to override the section of the web.config for each area to change the applicationName attribute of the provider. That doesn't work since the area is not set up as an application root. Is there an easy way to separate the users for each area?

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC 2 actionlink breaking after migration from MVC version 1

    - by thermal7
    Hi, I am migrating my application from asp.net mvc to mvc version 2 and am having the following issue. I have paging links << < that I include in each page. Like so: <% Html.RenderPartial("PagingControl", Model); %> They exist in an ascx file as follows. <%@ Control Language="C#" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewUserControl<BankingDB.Controllers.Utility.IPagedSortedObject>" %> <div class="paging"> <div class="previous-paging"> <!- error!! -><%= Model.HasPreviousPage ? Html.ActionLink("<<", "Index", Model.buildParams(1)) : "<<"%> <%= Model.HasPreviousPage ? Html.ActionLink("<", "Index", Model.buildParams(Model.PreviousPageIndex)) : "<"%> </div> <div class="paging-details"> Showing records <%= Model.BaseRecordIndex %> to <%= Model.MaxRecordIndex %> of <%= Model.TotalRecordCount %> </div> <div class="next-paging"> <%= Model.HasNextPage ? Html.ActionLink(">", "Index", Model.buildParams(Model.NextPageIndex)) : ">"%> <%= Model.HasNextPage ? Html.ActionLink(">>", "Index", Model.buildParams(Model.PageCount)) : ">>"%> </div> </div> When I try to access the page I get the error: CS0173: Type of conditional expression cannot be determined because there is no implicit conversion between 'System.Web.Mvc.MvcHtmlString' and 'string' The error is marked above and appears to be with the action link. Including the controller name doesn't help. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • VS 2010 SP1 and SQL CE

    - by ScottGu
    Last month we released the Beta of VS 2010 Service Pack 1 (SP1).  You can learn more about the VS 2010 SP1 Beta from Jason Zander’s two blog posts about it, and from Scott Hanselman’s blog post that covers some of the new capabilities enabled with it.   You can download and install the VS 2010 SP1 Beta here. Last week I blogged about the new Visual Studio support for IIS Express that we are adding with VS 2010 SP1. In today’s post I’m going to talk about the new VS 2010 SP1 tooling support for SQL CE, and walkthrough some of the cool scenarios it enables.  SQL CE – What is it and why should you care? SQL CE is a free, embedded, database engine that enables easy database storage. No Database Installation Required SQL CE does not require you to run a setup or install a database server in order to use it.  You can simply copy the SQL CE binaries into the \bin directory of your ASP.NET application, and then your web application can use it as a database engine.  No setup or extra security permissions are required for it to run. You do not need to have an administrator account on the machine. Just copy your web application onto any server and it will work. This is true even of medium-trust applications running in a web hosting environment. SQL CE runs in-memory within your ASP.NET application and will start-up when you first access a SQL CE database, and will automatically shutdown when your application is unloaded.  SQL CE databases are stored as files that live within the \App_Data folder of your ASP.NET Applications. Works with Existing Data APIs SQL CE 4 works with existing .NET-based data APIs, and supports a SQL Server compatible query syntax.  This means you can use existing data APIs like ADO.NET, as well as use higher-level ORMs like Entity Framework and NHibernate with SQL CE.  This enables you to use the same data programming skills and data APIs you know today. Supports Development, Testing and Production Scenarios SQL CE can be used for development scenarios, testing scenarios, and light production usage scenarios.  With the SQL CE 4 release we’ve done the engineering work to ensure that SQL CE won’t crash or deadlock when used in a multi-threaded server scenario (like ASP.NET).  This is a big change from previous releases of SQL CE – which were designed for client-only scenarios and which explicitly blocked running in web-server environments.  Starting with SQL CE 4 you can use it in a web-server as well. There are no license restrictions with SQL CE.  It is also totally free. Easy Migration to SQL Server SQL CE is an embedded database – which makes it ideal for development, testing, and light-usage scenarios.  For high-volume sites and applications you’ll probably want to migrate your database to use SQL Server Express (which is free), SQL Server or SQL Azure.  These servers enable much better scalability, more development features (including features like Stored Procedures – which aren’t supported with SQL CE), as well as more advanced data management capabilities. We’ll ship migration tools that enable you to optionally take SQL CE databases and easily upgrade them to use SQL Server Express, SQL Server, or SQL Azure.  You will not need to change your code when upgrading a SQL CE database to SQL Server or SQL Azure.  Our goal is to enable you to be able to simply change the database connection string in your web.config file and have your application just work. New Tooling Support for SQL CE in VS 2010 SP1 VS 2010 SP1 includes much improved tooling support for SQL CE, and adds support for using SQL CE within ASP.NET projects for the first time.  With VS 2010 SP1 you can now: Create new SQL CE Databases Edit and Modify SQL CE Database Schema and Indexes Populate SQL CE Databases within Data Use the Entity Framework (EF) designer to create model layers against SQL CE databases Use EF Code First to define model layers in code, then create a SQL CE database from them, and optionally edit the DB with VS Deploy SQL CE databases to remote servers using Web Deploy and optionally convert them to full SQL Server databases You can take advantage of all of the above features from within both ASP.NET Web Forms and ASP.NET MVC based projects. Download You can enable SQL CE tooling support within VS 2010 by first installing VS 2010 SP1 (beta). Once SP1 is installed, you’ll also then need to install the SQL CE Tools for Visual Studio download.  This is a separate download that enables the SQL CE tooling support for VS 2010 SP1. Walkthrough of Two Scenarios In this blog post I’m going to walkthrough how you can take advantage of SQL CE and VS 2010 SP1 using both an ASP.NET Web Forms and an ASP.NET MVC based application. Specifically, we’ll walkthrough: How to create a SQL CE database using VS 2010 SP1, then use the EF4 visual designers in Visual Studio to construct a model layer from it, and then display and edit the data using an ASP.NET GridView control. How to use an EF Code First approach to define a model layer using POCO classes and then have EF Code-First “auto-create” a SQL CE database for us based on our model classes.  We’ll then look at how we can use the new VS 2010 SP1 support for SQL CE to inspect the database that was created, populate it with data, and later make schema changes to it.  We’ll do all this within the context of an ASP.NET MVC based application. You can follow the two walkthroughs below on your own machine by installing VS 2010 SP1 (beta) and then installing the SQL CE Tools for Visual Studio download (which is a separate download that enables SQL CE tooling support for VS 2010 SP1). Walkthrough 1: Create a SQL CE Database, Create EF Model Classes, Edit the Data with a GridView This first walkthrough will demonstrate how to create and define a SQL CE database within an ASP.NET Web Form application.  We’ll then build an EF model layer for it and use that model layer to enable data editing scenarios with an <asp:GridView> control. Step 1: Create a new ASP.NET Web Forms Project We’ll begin by using the File->New Project menu command within Visual Studio to create a new ASP.NET Web Forms project.  We’ll use the “ASP.NET Web Application” project template option so that it has a default UI skin implemented: Step 2: Create a SQL CE Database Right click on the “App_Data” folder within the created project and choose the “Add->New Item” menu command: This will bring up the “Add Item” dialog box.  Select the “SQL Server Compact 4.0 Local Database” item (new in VS 2010 SP1) and name the database file to create “Store.sdf”: Note that SQL CE database files have a .sdf filename extension. Place them within the /App_Data folder of your ASP.NET application to enable easy deployment. When we clicked the “Add” button above a Store.sdf file was added to our project: Step 3: Adding a “Products” Table Double-clicking the “Store.sdf” database file will open it up within the Server Explorer tab.  Since it is a new database there are no tables within it: Right click on the “Tables” icon and choose the “Create Table” menu command to create a new database table.  We’ll name the new table “Products” and add 4 columns to it.  We’ll mark the first column as a primary key (and make it an identify column so that its value will automatically increment with each new row): When we click “ok” our new Products table will be created in the SQL CE database. Step 4: Populate with Data Once our Products table is created it will show up within the Server Explorer.  We can right-click it and choose the “Show Table Data” menu command to edit its data: Let’s add a few sample rows of data to it: Step 5: Create an EF Model Layer We have a SQL CE database with some data in it – let’s now create an EF Model Layer that will provide a way for us to easily query and update data within it. Let’s right-click on our project and choose the “Add->New Item” menu command.  This will bring up the “Add New Item” dialog – select the “ADO.NET Entity Data Model” item within it and name it “Store.edmx” This will add a new Store.edmx item to our solution explorer and launch a wizard that allows us to quickly create an EF model: Select the “Generate From Database” option above and click next.  Choose to use the Store.sdf SQL CE database we just created and then click next again.  The wizard will then ask you what database objects you want to import into your model.  Let’s choose to import the “Products” table we created earlier: When we click the “Finish” button Visual Studio will open up the EF designer.  It will have a Product entity already on it that maps to the “Products” table within our SQL CE database: The VS 2010 SP1 EF designer works exactly the same with SQL CE as it does already with SQL Server and SQL Express.  The Product entity above will be persisted as a class (called “Product”) that we can programmatically work against within our ASP.NET application. Step 6: Compile the Project Before using your model layer you’ll need to build your project.  Do a Ctrl+Shift+B to compile the project, or use the Build->Build Solution menu command. Step 7: Create a Page that Uses our EF Model Layer Let’s now create a simple ASP.NET Web Form that contains a GridView control that we can use to display and edit the our Products data (via the EF Model Layer we just created). Right-click on the project and choose the Add->New Item command.  Select the “Web Form from Master Page” item template, and name the page you create “Products.aspx”.  Base the master page on the “Site.Master” template that is in the root of the project. Add an <h2>Products</h2> heading the new Page, and add an <asp:gridview> control within it: Then click the “Design” tab to switch into design-view. Select the GridView control, and then click the top-right corner to display the GridView’s “Smart Tasks” UI: Choose the “New data source…” drop down option above.  This will bring up the below dialog which allows you to pick your Data Source type: Select the “Entity” data source option – which will allow us to easily connect our GridView to the EF model layer we created earlier.  This will bring up another dialog that allows us to pick our model layer: Select the “StoreEntities” option in the dropdown – which is the EF model layer we created earlier.  Then click next – which will allow us to pick which entity within it we want to bind to: Select the “Products” entity in the above dialog – which indicates that we want to bind against the “Product” entity class we defined earlier.  Then click the “Enable automatic updates” checkbox to ensure that we can both query and update Products.  When you click “Finish” VS will wire-up an <asp:EntityDataSource> to your <asp:GridView> control: The last two steps we’ll do will be to click the “Enable Editing” checkbox on the Grid (which will cause the Grid to display an “Edit” link on each row) and (optionally) use the Auto Format dialog to pick a UI template for the Grid. Step 8: Run the Application Let’s now run our application and browse to the /Products.aspx page that contains our GridView.  When we do so we’ll see a Grid UI of the Products within our SQL CE database. Clicking the “Edit” link for any of the rows will allow us to edit their values: When we click “Update” the GridView will post back the values, persist them through our EF Model Layer, and ultimately save them within our SQL CE database. Learn More about using EF with ASP.NET Web Forms Read this tutorial series on the http://asp.net site to learn more about how to use EF with ASP.NET Web Forms.  The tutorial series uses SQL Express as the database – but the nice thing is that all of the same steps/concepts can also now also be done with SQL CE.   Walkthrough 2: Using EF Code-First with SQL CE and ASP.NET MVC 3 We used a database-first approach with the sample above – where we first created the database, and then used the EF designer to create model classes from the database.  In addition to supporting a designer-based development workflow, EF also enables a more code-centric option which we call “code first development”.  Code-First Development enables a pretty sweet development workflow.  It enables you to: Define your model objects by simply writing “plain old classes” with no base classes or visual designer required Use a “convention over configuration” approach that enables database persistence without explicitly configuring anything Optionally override the convention-based persistence and use a fluent code API to fully customize the persistence mapping Optionally auto-create a database based on the model classes you define – allowing you to start from code first I’ve done several blog posts about EF Code First in the past – I really think it is great.  The good news is that it also works very well with SQL CE. The combination of SQL CE, EF Code First, and the new VS tooling support for SQL CE, enables a pretty nice workflow.  Below is a simple example of how you can use them to build a simple ASP.NET MVC 3 application. Step 1: Create a new ASP.NET MVC 3 Project We’ll begin by using the File->New Project menu command within Visual Studio to create a new ASP.NET MVC 3 project.  We’ll use the “Internet Project” template so that it has a default UI skin implemented: Step 2: Use NuGet to Install EFCodeFirst Next we’ll use the NuGet package manager (automatically installed by ASP.NET MVC 3) to add the EFCodeFirst library to our project.  We’ll use the Package Manager command shell to do this.  Bring up the package manager console within Visual Studio by selecting the View->Other Windows->Package Manager Console menu command.  Then type: install-package EFCodeFirst within the package manager console to download the EFCodeFirst library and have it be added to our project: When we enter the above command, the EFCodeFirst library will be downloaded and added to our application: Step 3: Build Some Model Classes Using a “code first” based development workflow, we will create our model classes first (even before we have a database).  We create these model classes by writing code. For this sample, we will right click on the “Models” folder of our project and add the below three classes to our project: The “Dinner” and “RSVP” model classes above are “plain old CLR objects” (aka POCO).  They do not need to derive from any base classes or implement any interfaces, and the properties they expose are standard .NET data-types.  No data persistence attributes or data code has been added to them.   The “NerdDinners” class derives from the DbContext class (which is supplied by EFCodeFirst) and handles the retrieval/persistence of our Dinner and RSVP instances from a database. Step 4: Listing Dinners We’ve written all of the code necessary to implement our model layer for this simple project.  Let’s now expose and implement the URL: /Dinners/Upcoming within our project.  We’ll use it to list upcoming dinners that happen in the future. We’ll do this by right-clicking on our “Controllers” folder and select the “Add->Controller” menu command.  We’ll name the Controller we want to create “DinnersController”.  We’ll then implement an “Upcoming” action method within it that lists upcoming dinners using our model layer above.  We will use a LINQ query to retrieve the data and pass it to a View to render with the code below: We’ll then right-click within our Upcoming method and choose the “Add-View” menu command to create an “Upcoming” view template that displays our dinners.  We’ll use the “empty” template option within the “Add View” dialog and write the below view template using Razor: Step 4: Configure our Project to use a SQL CE Database We have finished writing all of our code – our last step will be to configure a database connection-string to use. We will point our NerdDinners model class to a SQL CE database by adding the below <connectionString> to the web.config file at the top of our project: EF Code First uses a default convention where context classes will look for a connection-string that matches the DbContext class name.  Because we created a “NerdDinners” class earlier, we’ve also named our connectionstring “NerdDinners”.  Above we are configuring our connection-string to use SQL CE as the database, and telling it that our SQL CE database file will live within the \App_Data directory of our ASP.NET project. Step 5: Running our Application Now that we’ve built our application, let’s run it! We’ll browse to the /Dinners/Upcoming URL – doing so will display an empty list of upcoming dinners: You might ask – but where did it query to get the dinners from? We didn’t explicitly create a database?!? One of the cool features that EF Code-First supports is the ability to automatically create a database (based on the schema of our model classes) when the database we point it at doesn’t exist.  Above we configured  EF Code-First to point at a SQL CE database in the \App_Data\ directory of our project.  When we ran our application, EF Code-First saw that the SQL CE database didn’t exist and automatically created it for us. Step 6: Using VS 2010 SP1 to Explore our newly created SQL CE Database Click the “Show all Files” icon within the Solution Explorer and you’ll see the “NerdDinners.sdf” SQL CE database file that was automatically created for us by EF code-first within the \App_Data\ folder: We can optionally right-click on the file and “Include in Project" to add it to our solution: We can also double-click the file (regardless of whether it is added to the project) and VS 2010 SP1 will open it as a database we can edit within the “Server Explorer” tab of the IDE. Below is the view we get when we double-click our NerdDinners.sdf SQL CE file.  We can drill in to see the schema of the Dinners and RSVPs tables in the tree explorer.  Notice how two tables - Dinners and RSVPs – were automatically created for us within our SQL CE database.  This was done by EF Code First when we accessed the NerdDinners class by running our application above: We can right-click on a Table and use the “Show Table Data” command to enter some upcoming dinners in our database: We’ll use the built-in editor that VS 2010 SP1 supports to populate our table data below: And now when we hit “refresh” on the /Dinners/Upcoming URL within our browser we’ll see some upcoming dinners show up: Step 7: Changing our Model and Database Schema Let’s now modify the schema of our model layer and database, and walkthrough one way that the new VS 2010 SP1 Tooling support for SQL CE can make this easier.  With EF Code-First you typically start making database changes by modifying the model classes.  For example, let’s add an additional string property called “UrlLink” to our “Dinner” class.  We’ll use this to point to a link for more information about the event: Now when we re-run our project, and visit the /Dinners/Upcoming URL we’ll see an error thrown: We are seeing this error because EF Code-First automatically created our database, and by default when it does this it adds a table that helps tracks whether the schema of our database is in sync with our model classes.  EF Code-First helpfully throws an error when they become out of sync – making it easier to track down issues at development time that you might otherwise only find (via obscure errors) at runtime.  Note that if you do not want this feature you can turn it off by changing the default conventions of your DbContext class (in this case our NerdDinners class) to not track the schema version. Our model classes and database schema are out of sync in the above example – so how do we fix this?  There are two approaches you can use today: Delete the database and have EF Code First automatically re-create the database based on the new model class schema (losing the data within the existing DB) Modify the schema of the existing database to make it in sync with the model classes (keeping/migrating the data within the existing DB) There are a couple of ways you can do the second approach above.  Below I’m going to show how you can take advantage of the new VS 2010 SP1 Tooling support for SQL CE to use a database schema tool to modify our database structure.  We are also going to be supporting a “migrations” feature with EF in the future that will allow you to automate/script database schema migrations programmatically. Step 8: Modify our SQL CE Database Schema using VS 2010 SP1 The new SQL CE Tooling support within VS 2010 SP1 makes it easy to modify the schema of our existing SQL CE database.  To do this we’ll right-click on our “Dinners” table and choose the “Edit Table Schema” command: This will bring up the below “Edit Table” dialog.  We can rename, change or delete any of the existing columns in our table, or click at the bottom of the column listing and type to add a new column.  Below I’ve added a new “UrlLink” column of type “nvarchar” (since our property is a string): When we click ok our database will be updated to have the new column and our schema will now match our model classes. Because we are manually modifying our database schema, there is one additional step we need to take to let EF Code-First know that the database schema is in sync with our model classes.  As i mentioned earlier, when a database is automatically created by EF Code-First it adds a “EdmMetadata” table to the database to track schema versions (and hash our model classes against them to detect mismatches between our model classes and the database schema): Since we are manually updating and maintaining our database schema, we don’t need this table – and can just delete it: This will leave us with just the two tables that correspond to our model classes: And now when we re-run our /Dinners/Upcoming URL it will display the dinners correctly: One last touch we could do would be to update our view to check for the new UrlLink property and render a <a> link to it if an event has one: And now when we refresh our /Dinners/Upcoming we will see hyperlinks for the events that have a UrlLink stored in the database: Summary SQL CE provides a free, embedded, database engine that you can use to easily enable database storage.  With SQL CE 4 you can now take advantage of it within ASP.NET projects and applications (both Web Forms and MVC). VS 2010 SP1 provides tooling support that enables you to easily create, edit and modify SQL CE databases – as well as use the standard EF designer against them.  This allows you to re-use your existing skills and data knowledge while taking advantage of an embedded database option.  This is useful both for small applications (where you don’t need the scalability of a full SQL Server), as well as for development and testing scenarios – where you want to be able to rapidly develop/test your application without having a full database instance.  SQL CE makes it easy to later migrate your data to a full SQL Server or SQL Azure instance if you want to – without having to change any code in your application.  All we would need to change in the above two scenarios is the <connectionString> value within the web.config file in order to have our code run against a full SQL Server.  This provides the flexibility to scale up your application starting from a small embedded database solution as needed. Hope this helps, Scott P.S. In addition to blogging, I am also now using Twitter for quick updates and to share links. Follow me at: twitter.com/scottgu

    Read the article

  • Create Resume problem

    - by ar31an
    hello mates, i am working on a project of online resume management system and i am encountering an exception while creating resume. [b] Exception: Data type mismatch in criteria expression. [/b] here is my code for Create Resume-1.aspx.cs using System; using System.Data; using System.Configuration; using System.Collections; using System.Web; using System.Web.Security; using System.Web.UI; using System.Web.UI.WebControls; using System.Web.UI.WebControls.WebParts; using System.Web.UI.HtmlControls; using System.Data.OleDb; public partial class _Default : System.Web.UI.Page { string sql, sql2, sql3, sql4, sql5, sql6, sql7, sql8, sql9, sql10, sql11, sql12; string conString = "Provider=Microsoft.ACE.OLEDB.12.0; Data Source=D:\\Deliverable4.accdb"; protected OleDbConnection rMSConnection; protected OleDbCommand rMSCommand; protected OleDbDataAdapter rMSDataAdapter; protected DataSet dataSet; protected DataTable dataTable; protected DataRow dataRow; protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { } protected void Button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { string contact1 = TextBox1.Text; string contact2 = TextBox2.Text; string cellphone = TextBox3.Text; string address = TextBox4.Text; string city = TextBox5.Text; string addqualification = TextBox18.Text; //string SecondLastDegreeGrade = TextBox17.Text; //string SecondLastDegreeInstitute = TextBox16.Text; //string SecondLastDegreeNameOther = TextBox15.Text; string LastDegreeNameOther = TextBox11.Text; string LastDegreeInstitute = TextBox12.Text; string LastDegreeGrade = TextBox13.Text; string tentativeFromDate = (DropDownList4.SelectedValue + " " + DropDownList7.SelectedValue + " " + DropDownList8.SelectedValue); try { sql6 = "select CountryID from COUNTRY"; rMSConnection = new OleDbConnection(conString); rMSDataAdapter = new OleDbDataAdapter(sql6, rMSConnection); dataSet = new DataSet("cID"); rMSDataAdapter.Fill(dataSet, "COUNTRY"); dataTable = dataSet.Tables["COUNTRY"]; int cId = (int)dataTable.Rows[0][0]; rMSConnection.Close(); sql4 = "select PersonalDetailID from PERSONALDETAIL"; rMSConnection = new OleDbConnection(conString); rMSDataAdapter = new OleDbDataAdapter(sql4, rMSConnection); dataSet = new DataSet("PDID"); rMSDataAdapter.Fill(dataSet, "PERSONALDETAIL"); dataTable = dataSet.Tables["PERSONALDETAIL"]; int PDId = (int)dataTable.Rows[0][0]; rMSConnection.Close(); sql5 = "update PERSONALDETAIL set Phone1 ='" + contact1 + "' , Phone2 = '" + contact2 + "', CellPhone = '" + cellphone + "', Address = '" + address + "', City = '" + city + "', CountryID = '" + cId + "' where PersonalDetailID = '" + PDId + "'"; rMSConnection = new OleDbConnection(conString); rMSConnection.Open(); rMSCommand = new OleDbCommand(sql5, rMSConnection); rMSCommand.ExecuteNonQuery(); rMSConnection.Close(); sql3 = "select DesignationID from DESIGNATION"; rMSConnection = new OleDbConnection(conString); rMSDataAdapter = new OleDbDataAdapter(sql3, rMSConnection); dataSet = new DataSet("DesID"); rMSDataAdapter.Fill(dataSet, "DESIGNATION"); dataTable = dataSet.Tables["DESIGNATION"]; int desId = (int)dataTable.Rows[0][0]; rMSConnection.Close(); sql2 = "select DepartmentID from DEPARTMENT"; rMSConnection = new OleDbConnection(conString); rMSDataAdapter = new OleDbDataAdapter(sql2, rMSConnection); dataSet = new DataSet("DID"); rMSDataAdapter.Fill(dataSet, "DEPARTMENT"); dataTable = dataSet.Tables["DEPARTMENT"]; int dId = (int)dataTable.Rows[0][0]; rMSConnection.Close(); sql7 = "select ResumeID from RESUME"; rMSConnection = new OleDbConnection(conString); rMSDataAdapter = new OleDbDataAdapter(sql7, rMSConnection); dataSet = new DataSet("rID"); rMSDataAdapter.Fill(dataSet, "RESUME"); dataTable = dataSet.Tables["RESUME"]; int rId = (int)dataTable.Rows[0][0]; rMSConnection.Close(); sql = "update RESUME set PersonalDetailID ='" + PDId + "' , DesignationID = '" + desId + "', DepartmentID = '" + dId + "', TentativeFromDate = '" + tentativeFromDate + "', AdditionalQualification = '" + addqualification + "' where ResumeID = '" + rId + "'"; rMSConnection = new OleDbConnection(conString); rMSConnection.Open(); rMSCommand = new OleDbCommand(sql, rMSConnection); rMSCommand.ExecuteNonQuery(); rMSConnection.Close(); sql8 = "insert into INSTITUTE (InstituteName) values ('" + LastDegreeInstitute + "')"; rMSConnection = new OleDbConnection(conString); rMSConnection.Open(); rMSCommand = new OleDbCommand(sql8, rMSConnection); rMSCommand.ExecuteNonQuery(); rMSConnection.Close(); sql9 = "insert into DEGREE (DegreeName) values ('" + LastDegreeNameOther + "')"; rMSConnection = new OleDbConnection(conString); rMSConnection.Open(); rMSCommand = new OleDbCommand(sql9, rMSConnection); rMSCommand.ExecuteNonQuery(); rMSConnection.Close(); sql11 = "select InstituteID from INSTITUTE"; rMSConnection = new OleDbConnection(conString); rMSDataAdapter = new OleDbDataAdapter(sql11, rMSConnection); dataSet = new DataSet("insID"); rMSDataAdapter.Fill(dataSet, "INSTITUTE"); dataTable = dataSet.Tables["INSTITUTE"]; int insId = (int)dataTable.Rows[0][0]; rMSConnection.Close(); sql12 = "select DegreeID from DEGREE"; rMSConnection = new OleDbConnection(conString); rMSDataAdapter = new OleDbDataAdapter(sql12, rMSConnection); dataSet = new DataSet("degID"); rMSDataAdapter.Fill(dataSet, "DEGREE"); dataTable = dataSet.Tables["DEGREE"]; int degId = (int)dataTable.Rows[0][0]; rMSConnection.Close(); sql10 = "insert into QUALIFICATION (Grade, ResumeID, InstituteID, DegreeID) values ('" + LastDegreeGrade + "', '" + rId + "', '" + insId + "', '" + degId + "')"; rMSConnection = new OleDbConnection(conString); rMSConnection.Open(); rMSCommand = new OleDbCommand(sql10, rMSConnection); rMSCommand.ExecuteNonQuery(); rMSConnection.Close(); Response.Redirect("Applicant.aspx"); } catch (Exception exp) { rMSConnection.Close(); Label1.Text = "Exception: " + exp.Message; } } protected void Button2_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { } } And for Create Resume-1.aspx <%@ Page Language="C#" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeFile="Create Resume-1.aspx.cs" Inherits="_Default" %> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" > <head runat="server"> <title>Untitled Page</title> </head> <body> <form id="form1" runat="server"> <div><center> <strong><span style="font-size: 16pt"></span></strong>&nbsp;</center> <center> &nbsp;</center> <center style="background-color: silver"> &nbsp;</center> <center> <strong><span style="font-size: 16pt">Step 1</span></strong></center> <center style="background-color: silver"> &nbsp;</center> <center> &nbsp;</center> <center> &nbsp;</center> <center> <asp:Label ID="PhoneNo1" runat="server" Text="Contact No 1*"></asp:Label> <asp:TextBox ID="TextBox1" runat="server"></asp:TextBox> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="RequiredFieldValidator1" runat="server" ErrorMessage="Items marked with '*' cannot be left blank." ControlToValidate="TextBox1"></asp:RequiredFieldValidator><br /> <asp:Label ID="PhoneNo2" runat="server" Text="Contact No 2"></asp:Label> <asp:TextBox ID="TextBox2" runat="server"></asp:TextBox><br /> <asp:Label ID="CellNo" runat="server" Text="Cell Phone No"></asp:Label> <asp:TextBox ID="TextBox3" runat="server"></asp:TextBox><br /> <asp:Label ID="Address" runat="server" Text="Street Address*"></asp:Label> <asp:TextBox ID="TextBox4" runat="server"></asp:TextBox> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="RequiredFieldValidator2" runat="server" ErrorMessage="Items marked with '*' cannot be left blank." ControlToValidate="TextBox4"></asp:RequiredFieldValidator><br /> <asp:Label ID="City" runat="server" Text="City*"></asp:Label> <asp:TextBox ID="TextBox5" runat="server"></asp:TextBox> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="RequiredFieldValidator3" runat="server" ErrorMessage="Items marked with '*' cannot be left blank." ControlToValidate="TextBox5"></asp:RequiredFieldValidator><br /> <asp:Label ID="Country" runat="server" Text="Country of Origin*"></asp:Label> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList1" runat="server" DataSourceID="SqlDataSource1" DataTextField="CountryName" DataValueField="CountryID"> </asp:DropDownList><asp:SqlDataSource ID="SqlDataSource1" runat="server" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:ConnectionString7 %>" DeleteCommand="DELETE FROM [COUNTRY] WHERE (([CountryID] = ?) OR ([CountryID] IS NULL AND ? IS NULL))" InsertCommand="INSERT INTO [COUNTRY] ([CountryID], [CountryName]) VALUES (?, ?)" ProviderName="<%$ ConnectionStrings:ConnectionString7.ProviderName %>" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [COUNTRY]" UpdateCommand="UPDATE [COUNTRY] SET [CountryName] = ? WHERE (([CountryID] = ?) OR ([CountryID] IS NULL AND ? IS NULL))"> <DeleteParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="CountryID" Type="Int32" /> </DeleteParameters> <UpdateParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="CountryName" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="CountryID" Type="Int32" /> </UpdateParameters> <InsertParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="CountryID" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="CountryName" Type="String" /> </InsertParameters> </asp:SqlDataSource> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="RequiredFieldValidator4" runat="server" ErrorMessage="Items marked with '*' cannot be left blank." ControlToValidate="DropDownList1"></asp:RequiredFieldValidator><br /> <asp:Label ID="DepartmentOfInterest" runat="server" Text="Department of Interest*"></asp:Label> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList2" runat="server" DataSourceID="SqlDataSource2" DataTextField="DepartmentName" DataValueField="DepartmentID"> </asp:DropDownList><asp:SqlDataSource ID="SqlDataSource2" runat="server" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:ConnectionString7 %>" DeleteCommand="DELETE FROM [DEPARTMENT] WHERE [DepartmentID] = ?" InsertCommand="INSERT INTO [DEPARTMENT] ([DepartmentID], [DepartmentName]) VALUES (?, ?)" ProviderName="<%$ ConnectionStrings:ConnectionString7.ProviderName %>" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [DEPARTMENT]" UpdateCommand="UPDATE [DEPARTMENT] SET [DepartmentName] = ? WHERE [DepartmentID] = ?"> <DeleteParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="DepartmentID" Type="Int32" /> </DeleteParameters> <UpdateParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="DepartmentName" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="DepartmentID" Type="Int32" /> </UpdateParameters> <InsertParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="DepartmentID" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="DepartmentName" Type="String" /> </InsertParameters> </asp:SqlDataSource> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="RequiredFieldValidator5" runat="server" ErrorMessage="Items marked with '*' cannot be left blank." ControlToValidate="DropDownList2"></asp:RequiredFieldValidator><br /> <asp:Label ID="DesignationAppliedFor" runat="server" Text="Position Applied For*"></asp:Label> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList3" runat="server" DataSourceID="SqlDataSource3" DataTextField="DesignationName" DataValueField="DesignationID"> </asp:DropDownList><asp:SqlDataSource ID="SqlDataSource3" runat="server" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:ConnectionString7 %>" DeleteCommand="DELETE FROM [DESIGNATION] WHERE [DesignationID] = ?" InsertCommand="INSERT INTO [DESIGNATION] ([DesignationID], [DesignationName], [DesignationStatus]) VALUES (?, ?, ?)" ProviderName="<%$ ConnectionStrings:ConnectionString7.ProviderName %>" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [DESIGNATION]" UpdateCommand="UPDATE [DESIGNATION] SET [DesignationName] = ?, [DesignationStatus] = ? WHERE [DesignationID] = ?"> <DeleteParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="DesignationID" Type="Int32" /> </DeleteParameters> <UpdateParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="DesignationName" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="DesignationStatus" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="DesignationID" Type="Int32" /> </UpdateParameters> <InsertParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="DesignationID" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="DesignationName" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="DesignationStatus" Type="String" /> </InsertParameters> </asp:SqlDataSource> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="RequiredFieldValidator6" runat="server" ErrorMessage="Items marked with '*' cannot be left blank." ControlToValidate="DropDownList3"></asp:RequiredFieldValidator><br /> <asp:Label ID="TentativeFromDate" runat="server" Text="Can Join From*"></asp:Label> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList4" runat="server"> <asp:ListItem>1</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>2</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>3</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>4</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>5</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>6</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>7</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>8</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>9</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>10</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>11</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>12</asp:ListItem> </asp:DropDownList>&nbsp;<asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList7" runat="server"> <asp:ListItem>1</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>2</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>3</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>4</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>5</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>6</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>7</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>8</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>9</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>10</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>11</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>12</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>13</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>14</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>15</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>16</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>17</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>18</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>19</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>20</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>21</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>22</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>23</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>24</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>25</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>26</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>27</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>28</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>29</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>30</asp:ListItem> <asp:ListItem>31</asp:ListItem> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList8" runat="server"> <asp:ListItem>2010</asp:ListItem> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="RequiredFieldValidator7" runat="server" ErrorMessage="Items marked with '*' cannot be left blank." ControlToValidate="DropDownList4"></asp:RequiredFieldValidator></center> <center> <br /> <asp:Label ID="LastDegreeName" runat="server" Text="Last Degree*"></asp:Label> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList5" runat="server" DataSourceID="SqlDataSource5" DataTextField="DegreeName" DataValueField="DegreeID"> </asp:DropDownList><asp:SqlDataSource ID="SqlDataSource5" runat="server" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:ConnectionString7 %>" DeleteCommand="DELETE FROM [DEGREE] WHERE [DegreeID] = ?" InsertCommand="INSERT INTO [DEGREE] ([DegreeID], [DegreeName]) VALUES (?, ?)" ProviderName="<%$ ConnectionStrings:ConnectionString7.ProviderName %>" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [DEGREE]" UpdateCommand="UPDATE [DEGREE] SET [DegreeName] = ? WHERE [DegreeID] = ?"> <DeleteParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="DegreeID" Type="Int32" /> </DeleteParameters> <UpdateParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="DegreeName" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="DegreeID" Type="Int32" /> </UpdateParameters> <InsertParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="DegreeID" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="DegreeName" Type="String" /> </InsertParameters> </asp:SqlDataSource> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="RequiredFieldValidator8" runat="server" ErrorMessage="Items marked with '*' cannot be left blank." ControlToValidate="DropDownList5"></asp:RequiredFieldValidator><br /> <asp:Label ID="LastDegreeNameOther" runat="server" Text="Other"></asp:Label> <asp:TextBox ID="TextBox11" runat="server"></asp:TextBox><br /> <asp:Label ID="LastDegreeInstitute" runat="server" Text="Institute Name*"></asp:Label> <asp:TextBox ID="TextBox12" runat="server"></asp:TextBox> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="RequiredFieldValidator9" runat="server" ErrorMessage="Items marked with '*' cannot be left blank." ControlToValidate="TextBox12"></asp:RequiredFieldValidator><br /> <asp:Label ID="LastDegreeGrade" runat="server" Text="Marks / Grade*"></asp:Label> <asp:TextBox ID="TextBox13" runat="server"></asp:TextBox> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="RequiredFieldValidator10" runat="server" ErrorMessage="Items marked with '*' cannot be left blank." ControlToValidate="TextBox13"></asp:RequiredFieldValidator></center> <center> &nbsp;</center> <center> <br /> <asp:Label ID="SecondLastDegreeName" runat="server" Text="Second Last Degree*"></asp:Label> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList6" runat="server" DataSourceID="SqlDataSource4" DataTextField="DegreeName" DataValueField="DegreeID"> </asp:DropDownList><asp:SqlDataSource ID="SqlDataSource4" runat="server" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:ConnectionString7 %>" DeleteCommand="DELETE FROM [DEGREE] WHERE [DegreeID] = ?" InsertCommand="INSERT INTO [DEGREE] ([DegreeID], [DegreeName]) VALUES (?, ?)" ProviderName="<%$ ConnectionStrings:ConnectionString7.ProviderName %>" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [DEGREE]" UpdateCommand="UPDATE [DEGREE] SET [DegreeName] = ? WHERE [DegreeID] = ?"> <DeleteParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="DegreeID" Type="Int32" /> </DeleteParameters> <UpdateParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="DegreeName" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="DegreeID" Type="Int32" /> </UpdateParameters> <InsertParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="DegreeID" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="DegreeName" Type="String" /> </InsertParameters> </asp:SqlDataSource> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="RequiredFieldValidator11" runat="server" ErrorMessage="Items marked with '*' cannot be left blank." ControlToValidate="DropDownList6"></asp:RequiredFieldValidator><br /> <asp:Label ID="SecondLastDegreeNameOther" runat="server" Text="Other"></asp:Label> <asp:TextBox ID="TextBox15" runat="server"></asp:TextBox><br /> <asp:Label ID="SecondLastDegreeInstitute" runat="server" Text="Institute Name*"></asp:Label> <asp:TextBox ID="TextBox16" runat="server"></asp:TextBox> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="RequiredFieldValidator12" runat="server" ErrorMessage="Items marked with '*' cannot be left blank." ControlToValidate="TextBox16"></asp:RequiredFieldValidator><br /> <asp:Label ID="SecondLastDegreeGrade" runat="server" Text="Marks / Grade*"></asp:Label> <asp:TextBox ID="TextBox17" runat="server"></asp:TextBox> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="RequiredFieldValidator13" runat="server" ErrorMessage="Items marked with '*' cannot be left blank." ControlToValidate="TextBox17"></asp:RequiredFieldValidator></center> <center> <br /> <asp:Label ID="AdditionalQualification" runat="server" Text="Additional Qualification"></asp:Label> <asp:TextBox ID="TextBox18" runat="server" TextMode="MultiLine"></asp:TextBox></center> <center> &nbsp;</center> <center> <asp:Button ID="Button1" runat="server" Text="Save and Exit" OnClick="Button1_Click" /> &nbsp;&nbsp; <asp:Button ID="Button2" runat="server" Text="Next" OnClick="Button2_Click" /></center> <center> &nbsp;</center> <center> <asp:Label ID="Label1" runat="server"></asp:Label>&nbsp;</center> <center> &nbsp;</center> <center style="background-color: silver"> &nbsp;</center> </div> </form> </body> </html>

    Read the article

  • What is the equivalent of ASP:Timer control in ASP.NET MVC?

    - by Rupa
    Hi Recently i am working on migrating the ASP.NET Web application to MVC. I am wondering if there is any equivalent of ASP:Timer control in ASP.NET MVC Framework. So that this Timer control can automatically check for a particular value from the Database once in every couple of Seconds(that we specify). If there is no equivalent of Timer control in MVC, Are there any other ways to implement this. Appreciate your responses. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Weird .ASP pages from my non-ASP site generating 404s

    - by Amanda
    In Google Webmaster Tools, I have a huge list of "Not Found" crawl errors (404) with URLs that look like this: http://www.exclusivevillas.co.za/villa_view.asp?vSeq=82&activitySeq=3&page=3, seemingly originating from URLs very similar to that (eg http://www.exclusivevillas.co.za/villa_view.asp?vSeq=82&activitySeq=3&page=4. Thing is, the site is WordPress. Has been for almost a year now. Was plain html before that. I don't know where these ASP requests are coming from. And furthermore, the dates these supposed ASP pages requested these other ASP pages, resulting in 404s, are very recent. What's going on?

    Read the article

  • MVC Site - Ensuring the default entry view is always correct

    - by Klaptrap
    I have a MVC site with AD authorization. This is all working fine. I publish the site to the webserver and call the site directly (http://intranet). If I have not logged in for a while (I have an authorised cookie with a 30 minute TTL), I am prompted to log-in and if successful I am redirected to the homeController's index view. This is great and as expected. If I keep the session open (browser open) and browse away from the site, if I then browse back to http://intranet, I am not challenged as I have recently authenticated but the default page is from a different controller and not the home page view. How can I stop this from happening? It cannot be a session setting as this is not a new session and the routes appear correct - they are not beng called at this point anyhow. Please MVC guru's advise....!

    Read the article

  • MVC Client Validation from Service Layer

    - by GibboK
    I'm following this article http://www.asp.net/mvc/tutorials/older-versions/models-(data)/validating-with-a-service-layer-cs to include a Service Layer with Business Logic in my MVC Web Application. I'm able to pass messages from the Service Layer to the View Model in a Html.ValidationSummary using ModelState Class. I perform basic validation logic on the View Model (using DataAnnotation attributes) and I have ClientValidation enabled by default which displaying the error message on every single field of my form. The Business logic error message which come from the Service Layer are being displayed on Html.ValidationSummary only after Posting the form to the Server. After Validation from the Service Layer I would like highlight one or more fields and have the message from the Service Layer showing on these fields instead that the Html.ValidationSummary. Any idea how to do it? Thanks

    Read the article

  • What's missing in ASP.NET MVC?

    - by LukaszW.pl
    Hello stackoverflow, I think there are not many people who don't think that ASP.NET MVC is one of the greatest technologies Microsoft gave us. It gives full control over the rendered HTML, provides separation of concerns and suits to stateless nature of web. Next versions of framework gaves us new features and tools and it's great, but... what solutions should Microsoft include in new versions of framework? What are biggest gaps in comparison with another web frameworks like PHP or Ruby? What could improve developers productivity? What's missing in ASP.NET MVC?

    Read the article

  • Integrating ASP.NET MVC 2 with classic ASP

    - by David Lively
    I'm in the process of moving a large classic ASP application to ASP.NET MVC 2. Questions: My question is about project organization. I would prefer to not mix the MVC code with the ASP code in the same VS project. I'd like to have an MVC WAP with areas that match the parts of the website that I'm migrating. For instance, the old site has a folder /products/default.asp..... /products/productName/default.asp etc. In the MVC WAP, I'd like to have an area called "products", which I could then, either through a rewrite, routing, or preferably through some IIS configuration, point the "products" folder on the ASP site to. In this way, I could gradually move root folders from the ASP site to the MVC application. However, if I create the MVC WAP in a virtual folder, then my routes wind up looking like http://localhost/virtualFolder/products instead of http://localhost/products Any suggestions on how to conquer this? I know that, during deployment, I could deploy the MVC WAP into the root of the ASP site, but this doesn't help with debugging.

    Read the article

  • ASP.Net MVC vs ASP.Net for Complex workflows

    - by Grant Sutcliffe
    I have just become involved in migrating a series of complex workflows with InfoPath UIs to Web-based UIs. I am new to ASP.Net MVC but have started to evaluate it as the technology versus classic ASP.Net for the job. As is typical of most workflows, in each state there are a number of business rules that determine (a) who can view what content; (2) who can edit what content; (3) what the user action options might be (Edit; Reject; Approve), etc. In essence, there is a lot of logic that needs to be applied to each request before presenting the appropriate view. Being more experienced in ASP.Net, I know that presenting the form(s) as required can be easily achieved through code behind pages (enable / disable / hide fields). I have not seen how this can be achieved with ASP.Net MVC (but am realising that new thinking is required of me when working with MVC - ‘Give only the content on a particular View + limited user action options’). Therefore, if using ASP.Net MVC, it looks like I would need to create a lot of views. Much of the content in each view would be the same. Only field enabled status or buttons would differ in most instances for these views in each state. For example: Step01Initiate (‘Has Save’ button); Step01OriginatorView (has ‘Edit’ Button) ; Step01OriginatorEdit (has ‘Save’ button); Step01Review (has ‘Accept’ / ‘Reject’ buttons); Step01ReviewReject (for reviewer notes; has ‘Save’ / ‘Cancel’ buttons). With workflows of up to six states, this would result in a lot of views. I can see the advantages of choosing ASP.MVC (1) ‘thin’ Views in terms of content; and (2) with logic consolidation in Controllers and different Models. Am I thinking along the right lines in terms of applying the MVC – ‘plenty of views’; or is there a better way to achieve my goal (using ASP.Net MVC or classic ASP.Net)?

    Read the article

  • PDC and Tech-Ed Europe Slides and Code

    - by Stephen Walther
    I spent close to three weeks on the road giving talks at Tech-Ed Europe (Berlin), PDC (Los Angeles), and the Los Angeles Code Camp (Los Angeles). I got to talk about two topics that I am very passionate about: ASP.NET MVC and Ajax. Thanks everyone for coming to all my talks! At PDC, I announced all of the new features of our ASP.NET Ajax Library. In particular, I made five big announcements: ASP.NET Ajax Library Beta Released – You can download the beta from Ajax.CodePlex.com ASP.NET Ajax Library includes the AJAX Control Toolkit – You can use the Ajax Control Toolkit with ASP.NET MVC. ASP.NET Ajax Library being contributed to the CodePlex Foundation – ASP.NET Ajax is the founding project for the CodePlex Foundation (see CodePlex.org) ASP.NET Ajax Library is receiving full product support – Complain to Microsoft Customer Service at midnight on Christmas ASP.NET Ajax Library supports jQuery integration – Use (almost) all of the Ajax Control Toolkit controls in jQuery For more details on the Ajax announcements, see James Senior’s blog entry on the Ajax announcements at: http://jamessenior.com/post/News-on-the-ASPNET-Ajax-Library.aspx In my MVC talks, I discussed the new features being introduced with ASP.NET MVC 2. Here are three of my favorite new features: Client Validation – Client validation done the right way. Do your validation in your model and let the validation bubble up to JavaScript code automatically. Areas – Divide your ASP.NET MVC application into sub-applications. Great for managing both medium and large projects. RenderAction() – Finally, a way to add content to master pages and multiple pages without doing anything strange or twisted. There are demos of all of these features in the MVC downloads below. Here are the power point and code from all of the talks: PDC – Introducing the New ASP.NET Ajax Library PDC – ASP.NET MVC: The New Stuff Tech-Ed Europe - What's New in Microsoft ASP.NET Model-View-Controller Tech-Ed Europe - Microsoft ASP.NET AJAX: Taking AJAX to the Next Level

    Read the article

  • Razor – Hiding a Section in a Layout

    - by João Angelo
    Layouts in Razor allow you to define placeholders named sections where content pages may insert custom content much like the ContentPlaceHolder available in ASPX master pages. When you define a section in a Razor layout it’s possible to specify if the section must be defined in every content page using the layout or if its definition is optional allowing a page not to provide any content for that section. For the latter case, it’s also possible using the IsSectionDefined method to render default content when a page does not define the section. However if you ever require to hide a given section from all pages based on some runtime condition you might be tempted to conditionally define it in the layout much like in the following code snippet. if(condition) { @RenderSection("ConditionalSection", false) } With this code you’ll hit an error as soon as any content page provides content for the section which makes sense since if a page inherits a layout then it should only define sections that are also defined in it. To workaround this scenario you have a couple of options. Make the given section optional with and move the condition that enables or disables it to every content page. This leads to code duplication and future pages may forget to only define the section based on that same condition. The other option is to conditionally define the section in the layout page using the following hack: @{ if(condition) { @RenderSection("ConditionalSection", false) } else { RenderSection("ConditionalSection", false).WriteTo(TextWriter.Null); } } Hack inspired by a recent stackoverflow question.

    Read the article

  • Compress session state in ASP.Net 4.0

    - by nikolaosk
    Hello folks, In this post I would like to talk about a new feature of ASP.NET 4.0 - easy state compression . When we create web-asp.net applications the user must feel that whenever he interacts with the website, he actually interacts with something that can be safely described as an application. What I mean by this is that is that during a postback the whole page is re-created and is sent back to the client in a fraction of a second. The server has no idea what the user does with the page. If we...(read more)

    Read the article

  • Data binding in an ASP.Net application with Entity Framework

    - by nikolaosk
    This is going to be the eighth post of a series of posts regarding ASP.Net and the Entity Framework and how we can use Entity Framework to access our datastore. You can find the first one here , the second one here , the third one here , the fourth one here , the fifth one here ,the sixth one here and the seventh one here . I have a post regarding ASP.Net and EntityDataSource . You can read it here .I have 3 more posts on Profiling Entity Framework applications. You can have a look at them here ...(read more)

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20  | Next Page >