Search Results

Search found 57023 results on 2281 pages for 'object to string'.

Page 130/2281 | < Previous Page | 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137  | Next Page >

  • Java splitting string by custom regex match

    - by slikz
    I am completely new to regular expressions so I'm looking for a bit of help here. I am compiling under JDK 1.5 Take this line as an example that I read from standard input: ab:Some string po:bubblegum What I would like to do is split by the two characters and colon. That is, once the line is split and put into a string array, these should be the terms: ab:Some string po:bubblegum I have this regex right now: String[] split = input.split("[..:]"); This splits at the semicolon; what I would like is for it to match two characters and a semicolon, but split at the space before that starts. Is this even possible? Here is the output from the string array: ab Some String po bubblegum I've read about Pattern.compile() as well. Is this something I should be considering?

    Read the article

  • Serialized object in intent returning as String

    - by B_
    In my application, I am trying to pass a serializable object through an intent to another activity. The intent is not entirely created by me, it is created and passed through a search suggestion. In the content provider for the search suggestion, the object is created and placed in the SUGGEST_COLUMN_INTENT_EXTRA_DATA column of the MatrixCursor. However, when in the receiving activity I call getIntent().getSerializableExtra(SearchManager.EXTRA_DATA_KEY), the returned object is of type String and I cannot cast it into the original object class. I tried making a parcelable wrapper for my object that calls out.writeSerializable(...) and use that instead but the same thing happened. The string that is returned is like a generic Object toString(), i.e. com.foo.yak.MyAwesomeClass@4350058, so I'm assuming that toString() is being called somewhere where I have no control. Hopefully I'm just missing something simple. Thanks for the help!

    Read the article

  • Wordpress - how to replace <!--more--> with string on the_content() in single.php [migrated]

    - by Bob Cavezza
    I want to add text on a single wordpress blog post page where the "read more" text would usually be inserted. However, I can't configure a plugin to replace that text. I tried a few different sources, but I'm having trouble finding the solution. After looking through WordPress plugin: finding the <!--more--> in the_content and the page it links to, I still haven't been able to find a solution to this.

    Read the article

  • PHP object help -> unexpected T_OBJECT_OPERATOR

    - by php-b-grader
    Please help me understand: print gettype(new CustomerObject()) prints: "object" (so it is an object) BUT print gettype((new CustomerObject())->get_customer()); prints: unexpected T_OBJECT_OPERATOR If I do it over two lines it works fine $object = new Customer($order->customer_id); print gettype($object); prints: object $customer = $object->get_customer(); print gettype($customer); prints: array It appears that the lines cannot be joined into a single call. Is this correct? and what is the logic behind that?

    Read the article

  • PHP inheriting/extending a particular instance of an Object

    - by delta9
    Is there any way to force PHP to extend an existing/particular (and for that matter, already instantiated) instance of an object? This imaginary code should explain what I am wondering: class Base { public $var; function __construct($var){ $this->var = $name; } } class Extender extends Base { function __construct($parent) { parent = $parent; } } $base = new Base('yay!'); $extender = new Extender($base); echo 'Extended base var value: '.$extender->var.'<br/>'; Output (would be): Extended base var value: yay! To be clear, I am wanting to instantiate an object that extends a PARTICULAR INSTANCE of another object, one that has already been instantiated. I am aware that I can pass a reference to an object to another object (via it's constructor function) and then add it as a property of the receiving object, I'm wondering if there is a real way to do this?

    Read the article

  • About a Class Object

    - by Chicko Bueno
    I have a very basic question about a class object. After the class has been created, we need to create a class object. At this point, I'm a bit confused to make either *object or object. Example: CClass object CClass *object What is the difference both of them? And to access class function i need to use dot '.' and arrow '->'. I know dot and arrow used to access class function, but what is the significant meaning for both dot and arrow?

    Read the article

  • Method to concatenate 2 Strings in Java

    - by GooF
    I have a method in Java that concatenates 2 Strings. It currently works correctly, but I think it can be written better. public static String concat(String str1, String str2) { String rVal = null; if (str1 != null || str2 != null) { rVal = ""; if (str1 != null) { rVal += str1; } if (str2 != null) { rVal += str2; } } return rVal; } Here are some of the requirements: If both str1 and str2 are null, the method returns null If either str1 or str2 is null, it will just return the not null String If str1 and str2 are not null, it will concatenate them It never adds "null" to the result Can anyone do this with less code?

    Read the article

  • Creating ASP.NET 3.5 Admin Pages using a Query String in a Master Page

    This is the continuation of part one which ran on Tuesday of last week. After deleting the styles lt style type= text css gt in the head section of MasterPage.master you will need to create an external CSS to solve the relative URL problems in the website. This will ensure that the background images and links work according to the master page design. This article will explain how to do this and more.... Comcast? Business Class - Official Site Learn About Comcast Small Business Services. Best in Phone, TV & Internet.

    Read the article

  • Parsing through Arabic / RTL text from left to right

    - by Dan W
    Let's say I have a string in an RTL language such as Arabic with some English chucked in: string s = "Test:?????;?????;?????;a;b" Notice there are semicolons in the string. When I use the Split command like string[] spl = s.Split(';');, then some of the strings are saved in reverse order. This is what happens: ??Test:????? ????? ????? a b The above is out of order compared to the original. Instead, I expect to get this: ?Test: ????? ????? ????? a b I'm prepared to write my own split function. However, the chars in the string also parse in reverse order, so I'm back to square one. I just want to go through each character as it's shown on the screen.

    Read the article

  • Falsey values vs null, undefned, or empty string

    - by user687554
    I've worked with jQuery over the years. However, recently, I've found myself getting deeper into the JavaScript language. Recently, I've heard about "truthy" and falsey values. However, I don't fully understand them. Currently, I have some code that looks like this: var fields = options.fields || ['id', 'query']; I need to identify if fields is null, undefined, or has a length of 0. I know the long way is to do: if ((fields === null) || (fields === undefined) || (fields.length === 0)) { ... } My question is, is the following the same: if (!fields) { ... } Thank you!

    Read the article

  • Game Object Design

    - by oisin
    I'm having a problem with the way I designed my first simple game in C++. I have GameObject (abstract class) and ObjectA which inherits the update() and draw() methods from GameObject. My main loop contains a linked list of GameObject*, and while that list is not empty it cycles through it, calling update on each one. Up until this point, I thought the design was standard(?) and would work. However, when I call update on ObjectA() I run into two problems: ObjectA can die which messes up the list, which in turn throws off the loop in main. ObjectA can spawn more ObjectA's but these are local scope and the update() goes out of scope, creating problems in main's list of GameObjects. I think my design if alright, but I'm having such problems with segmentation faults that there must be something seriously wrong with at least one part of my implementation. If anyone could point out any serious mistakes or simple examples of this being done (or even alternative designs) then I would greatly appreciate it!

    Read the article

  • hibernate criteria list problem [migrated]

    - by user1022676
    I have a user dao @Entity @Table(name="EBIGUSERTIM") public class EbigUser { private String id; private Integer source; private String entryscheme; private String fullName; private String email; private Long flags; private String status; private String createdBy; private Date createdStamp; private String modifiedBy; private Date modifiedStamp; @Id @Column(name="ID") public String getId() { return id; } public void setId(String id) { this.id = id; } @Id @Column(name="SOURCE") public Integer getSource() { return source; } public void setSource(Integer source) { this.source = source; } @Column(name="ENTRYSCHEME") public String getEntryscheme() { return entryscheme; } public void setEntryscheme(String entryscheme) { this.entryscheme = entryscheme; } @Column(name="FULLNAME") public String getFullName() { return fullName; } public void setFullName(String fullName) { this.fullName = fullName; } @Column(name="EMAIL") public String getEmail() { return email; } public void setEmail(String email) { this.email = email; } @Column(name="FLAGS") public Long getFlags() { return flags; } public void setFlags(Long flags) { this.flags = flags; } @Column(name="STATUS") public String getStatus() { return status; } public void setStatus(String status) { this.status = status; } @Column(name="CREATEDBY") public String getCreatedBy() { return createdBy; } public void setCreatedBy(String createdBy) { this.createdBy = createdBy; } @Column(name="CREATEDSTAMP") public Date getCreatedStamp() { return createdStamp; } public void setCreatedStamp(Date createdStamp) { this.createdStamp = createdStamp; } @Column(name="MODIFIEDBY") public String getModifiedBy() { return modifiedBy; } public void setModifiedBy(String modifiedBy) { this.modifiedBy = modifiedBy; } @Column(name="MODIFIEDSTAMP") public Date getModifiedStamp() { return modifiedStamp; } public void setModifiedStamp(Date modifiedStamp) { this.modifiedStamp = modifiedStamp; } i am selecting 2 rows out of the db. The sql works select * from ebigusertim where id='blah'. It returns 2 distinct rows. When i query the data using hibernate, it appears that the object memory is not being allocated for each entry in the list. Thus, i get 2 entries in the list with the same object. Criteria userCriteria = session.createCriteria(EbigUser.class); userCriteria.add(Restrictions.eq("id", id)); userlist = userCriteria.list();

    Read the article

  • String[] initialized by null???

    - by Esmond
    Hi i encountered this problem whereby when i initialized my String[], there seems to be a null in the String[] before i do anything. How do i initialized the String[] to be completely empty,i.e. without the null at the start? The output for the following code is: nullABC nullABC nullABC nullABC nullABC public static void main(String[] args){ String[] inputArr = new String[5]; for (int i = 0; i< inputArr.length; i++){ inputArr[i] += "ABC"; } for (int i = 0; i< inputArr.length; i++){ System.out.println(inputArr[i]); } } }

    Read the article

  • error: switch quantity not an integer

    - by nikeunltd
    I have researched my issue all over StackOverflow and multi-google links, and I am still confused. I figured the best thing for me is ask... Im creating a simple command line calculator. Here is my code so far: const std::string Calculator::SIN("sin"); const std::string Calculator::COS("cos"); const std::string Calculator::TAN("tan"); const std::string Calculator::LOG( "log" ); const std::string Calculator::LOG10( "log10" ); void Calculator::set_command( std::string cmd ) { for(unsigned i = 0; i < cmd.length(); i++) { cmd[i] = tolower(cmd[i]); } command = cmd; } bool Calculator::is_legal_command() const { switch(command) { case TAN: case SIN: case COS: case LOG: case LOG10: return true; break; default: return false; break; } } the error i get is: Calculator.cpp: In member function 'bool Calculator::is_trig_command() const': Calculator.cpp: error: switch quantity not an integer Calculator.cpp: error: 'Calculator::TAN' cannot appear in a constant-expression Calculator.cpp: error: 'Calculator::SIN' cannot appear in a constant-expression Calculator.cpp: error: 'Calculator::COS' cannot appear in a constant-expression The mighty internet, it says strings are allowed to be used in switch statements. Thanks everyone, I appreciate your help.

    Read the article

  • Problem with File IO and splitting strings with Environment.NewLine in VB.Net

    - by Senthil
    Hi, I was experimenting with basic VB.Net file read/write and encountered this problem. I don't know whether it has something to do with the File IO or the String splitting. I am writing text to a file like so Dim sWriter As New StreamWriter("Data.txt") sWriter.WriteLine("FirstItem") sWriter.WriteLine("SecondItem") sWriter.WriteLine("ThirdItem") sWriter.Close() Then, I am reading the text from the file Dim sReader As New StreamReader("Data.txt") Dim fileContents As String = sReader.ReadToEnd() sReader.Close() Now, I am splitting the fileContents variable using Environment.NewLine and saving the returned String array. Dim tempStr() As String = fileContents.Split(Environment.NewLine) When I print the array, I get some weird results For Each str As String In tempStr Console.WriteLine("*" + str + "*") Next I added the *'s to the beginning and end to find out what is going on. Since NewLine is used as the delimiter, I expect the strings in the array to NOT have any NewLine's. But the output was this - *FirstItem* * SecondItem* * ThirdItem* * * Shouldn't it be this - *FirstItem* *SecondItem* *ThirdItem* ?? Since I am using WriteLine, my guess is a new line is added after the last string and hence the last empty item in the array after splitting. But why is there a new line in the beginning of the second and third strings?

    Read the article

  • Example with Visitor Pattern

    - by devoured elysium
    public class Song { public string Genre { get; protected set; } public string Name { get; protected set; } public string Band { get; protected set; } public Song(string name, string band, string genre) { Name = name; Genre = genre; Band = band; } } public interface IMusicVisistor { void Visit(List<Song> items); } public class MusicLibrary { List<Song> _songs = new List<Song> { ...songs ... }; public void Accept(IMusicVisitor visitor) { visitor.Visit(_songs); } } and now here's one Visitor I made: public class RockMusicVisitor : IMusicVisitor { public List<Song> Songs { get; protected set; } public void Visit(List<Song> items) { Songs = items.Where(x => x.Genre == "Rock").ToList(); } } Why is this any better than just putting a public property Songs and then letting any kind of class do with it anything that it wants to? This example comes from this post.

    Read the article

  • Fun things you can do by mutating Java strings

    - by polygenelubricants
    So I've come around since I asked how to limit setAccessible to only “legitimate” uses and have come to embrace its power for fun. Enabled by its power, of course, is string mutation. import java.lang.reflect.Field; public class Mutator { static void mutate(Object obj, String field, Object newValue) { try { Field f = obj.getClass().getDeclaredField(field); f.setAccessible(true); f.set(obj, newValue); } catch (Exception e) { } } public static void mutate(String from, String to) { mutate(from, "value", to.toCharArray()); mutate(from, "count", to.length()); } public static void main(String args[]) { Mutator.mutate(System.getProperty("line.separator"), "<br/>\n"); System.out.println("Hello world!"); Mutator.mutate(Integer.toString(Integer.MIN_VALUE), "OMG!"); System.out.println(-2147483648); Mutator.mutate(String.valueOf((Object) null), "LOL!"); System.out.println(Arrays.toString(new int[3][])); Mutator.mutate(Arrays.toString(new int[0]), ":("); System.out.println(Arrays.toString(new byte[0])); } } Output (if no exception is thrown): Hello world!<br/> OMG!<br/> [LOL!, LOL!, LOL!]<br/> :(<br/> Let's see what other fun things we can come up with.

    Read the article

  • How can I handle dynamic calculated attributes in a model in Django?

    - by bullfish
    In Django I calculate the breadcrumb (a list of fathers) for an geographical object. Since it is not going to change very often, I am thinking of pre calculating it once the object is saved or initialized. 1.) What would be better? Which solution would have a better performance? To calculate it at _init_ or to calculate it when the object is saved (the object takes about 500-2000 characters in the DB)? 2.) I tried to overwrite the _init_ or save() methods but I don't know how to use attributes of the just saved object. Accessing *args, **kwargs did not work. How can I access them? Do I have to save, access the father and then save again? 3.) If I decide to save the breadcrumb. Whats the best way to do it? I used http://www.djangosnippets.org/snippets/1694/ and have crumb = PickledObjectField(). Thats the method to calculate the attribute crumb() def _breadcrumb(self): breadcrumb = [ ] x = self while True: x = x.father try: if hasattr(x, 'country'): breadcrumb.append(x.country) elif hasattr(x, 'region'): breadcrumb.append(x.region) elif hasattr(x, 'city'): breadcrumb.append(x.city) else: break except: break breadcrumb.reverse() return breadcrumb Thats my save-Method: def save(self,*args, **kwargs): # how can I access the father ob the object? father = self.father # does obviously not work father = kwargs['father'] # does not work either # the breadcrumb gets calculated here self.crumb = self._breadcrumb(father) super(GeoObject, self).save(*args,**kwargs) Please help me out. I am working on this for days now. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Setting objct literal property value via asynchronous callback.

    - by typeof
    I'm creating a self-contained javascript utility object that detects advanced browser features. Ideally, my object would look something like this: Support = { borderRadius : false, // values returned by functions gradient : false, // i am defining dataURI : true }; My current problem deals with some code I'm adapting from Weston Ruter's site which detects dataURI support. It attempts to use javascript to create an image with a dataURI source, and uses onload/onerror callbacks to check the width/height. Since onload is asynchronous, I lose my scope and returning true/false does not assign true/false to my object. Here is my attempt: Support = { ... dataURI : function(prop) { prop = prop; // keeps in closure for callback var data = new Image(); data.onload = data.onerror = function(){ if(this.width != 1 || this.height != 1) { that = false; } that = true; } data.src = ""; return -1; }(this) }; I'm executing the anonymous function immediately, passing this (which I hoped was a reference to Support.dataURI), but unfortunately references the window object -- so the value is always -1. I can get it to work by using an externally defined function to assign the value after the Support object is created... but I don't think it's very clean that way. Is there a way for it to be self-contained? Can the object literal's function reference the property it's assigned to?

    Read the article

  • Initial capacity of collection types, i.e. Dictionary, List

    - by Neil N
    Certain collection types in .Net have an optional "Initial Capacity" constructor param. i.e. Dictionary<string, string> something = new Dictionary<string,string>(20); List<string> anything = new List<string>(50); I can't seem to find what the default initial capacity is for these objects on MSDN. If I know I will only be storing 12 or so items in a dictionary, doesn't it make sense to set the initial capacity to something like 20? My reasoning is, assuming the capacity grows like it does for a StringBuiler, which doubles each time the capacity is hit, and each re-allocation is costly, why not pre-set the size to something you know will hold your data, with some extra room just in case? If the initial capacity is 100, and I know I will only need a dozen or so, it seems as though the rest of that allocated RAM is allocated for nothing. Please spare me the "premature optimization" speil for the O(n^n)th time. I know it won't make my apps any faster or save any meaningful amount of memory, this is mostly out of curiosity.

    Read the article

  • How to put Listview items into String Array?

    - by user2851687
    Im developing an app and as the title says how to put items of listview into String array, not string array to listview but listview to string array. I've been searching for this but what I only found is putting String array items into listview. Please help me thank you in advance. To clarify this thread, the question is how to put listview items into String array. Thanks. :D Codes public class DailyPlanTab extends Activity implements OnItemClickListener { ListView dailyPlanList; ArrayList<DailyManager> taskList = new ArrayList<DailyManager>(); DatabaseDailyPlan db; @Override protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.dailyplan_layout); dailyPlanList = (ListView) findViewById(R.id.lvDailyPlanList); dailyPlanList.setOnItemClickListener(this); ImageView add = (ImageView) findViewById(R.id.ivDailyPlanAdd); add.setOnClickListener(new OnClickListener() { @Override public void onClick(View v) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub Intent newDailyIntent = new Intent(getApplicationContext(), NewDailyPlan.class); startActivity(newDailyIntent); } }); } @Override protected void onResume() { // TODO Auto-generated method stub super.onResume(); taskList.clear(); db = new DatabaseDailyPlan(getApplicationContext()); db.getWritableDatabase(); ArrayList<DailyManager> tempList = db.getTask(); for (int i = 0; i < tempList.size(); i++) { String getTask = tempList.get(i).getDaily_name(); String getDate = tempList.get(i).getDaily_date(); int getId = tempList.get(i).getDaily_id(); DailyManager dm = new DailyManager(); dm.setDaily_name(getTask); dm.setDaily_date(getDate); dm.setDaily_id(getId); taskList.add(dm); } dailyPlanList.setAdapter(new ListAdapter(this)); // db.close(); } public class ListAdapter extends BaseAdapter { LayoutInflater inflater; ViewHolder viewHolder; public ListAdapter(Context c) { // TODO Auto-generated constructor stub inflater = LayoutInflater.from(c); } @Override public int getCount() { // TODO Auto-generated method stub return taskList.size(); } @Override public Object getItem(int position) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub return position; } @Override public long getItemId(int position) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub return position; } @Override public View getView(int position, View convertView, ViewGroup parent) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub if (convertView == null) { convertView = inflater.inflate(R.layout.row_checklist_item, null); viewHolder = new ViewHolder(); viewHolder.taskTitle = (TextView) convertView .findViewById(R.id.tvCheckListItem); convertView.setTag(viewHolder); } else { viewHolder = (ViewHolder) convertView.getTag(); } viewHolder.taskTitle.setText("" + taskList.get(position).getDaily_name()); return convertView; } } public class ViewHolder { TextView taskTitle, taskDate; } @Override public void onItemClick(AdapterView<?> arg0, View arg1, int position, long arg3) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub int taskId = taskList.get(position).getDaily_id(); String taskName = taskList.get(position).getDaily_name(); String taskDate = taskList.get(position).getDaily_date(); Intent newPlan = new Intent(getApplicationContext(), DailyPlan.class); newPlan.putExtra("task_id", taskId); newPlan.putExtra("task_name", taskName); startActivity(newPlan); } next is the information of the item inside the listview public class DailyPlan extends Activity implements OnItemClickListener { final ArrayList<DailyManager> savedItems = new ArrayList<DailyManager>(); ListView checkList; Boolean nextItem = false; TempManager tm; DatabaseTemp dbTemp; Intent i; int taskId = -1; String taskName = " ", taskDate = null; DatabaseDailyPlan db; DailyManager dm; @Override protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub super.onCreate(savedInstanceState); setContentView(R.layout.saved_dailyplan); checkList = (ListView) findViewById(R.id.lvCheckList); // checkList.setOnItemClickListener(this); try { i = getIntent(); taskId = i.getExtras().getInt("task_id"); taskName = i.getExtras().getString("task_name"); Toast.makeText(getApplicationContext(), "From new id is" + taskId, 5000).show(); } catch (Exception e) { } Button addList = (Button) findViewById(R.id.bAddList); addList.setOnClickListener(new OnClickListener() { @Override public void onClick(View v) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub // openDialog("", false, -1); } }); if (nextItem) { // openDialog("", false, -1); } } public void refresh() { DailyPlan.this.onResume(); } @Override protected void onResume() { // TODO Auto-generated method stub super.onResume(); savedItems.clear(); dbTemp = new DatabaseTemp(getApplicationContext()); dbTemp.getWritableDatabase(); db = new DatabaseDailyPlan(getApplicationContext()); db.getWritableDatabase(); if (taskId != -1) { // / For Load ArrayList<DailyManager> savedList = db.getList(taskId); for (int i = 0; i < savedList.size(); i++) { String savedListItems = savedList.get(i).getDaily_list(); String savedListTitle = savedList.get(i).getDaily_name(); String savedListDate = savedList.get(i).getDaily_date(); int savedListId = savedList.get(i).getDaily_id(); DailyManager dm = new DailyManager(); dm.setDaily_list(savedListItems); dm.setDaily_name(savedListTitle); dm.setDaily_date(savedListDate); dm.setDaily_id(savedListId); savedItems.add(dm); } } else { // / For New } checkList.setAdapter(new ListAdapter(this)); } public class ListAdapter extends BaseAdapter { LayoutInflater inflater; ViewHolder viewHolder; public ListAdapter(Context c) { // TODO Auto-generated constructor stub inflater = LayoutInflater.from(c); } @Override public int getCount() { // TODO Auto-generated method stub return savedItems.size(); } @Override public Object getItem(int position) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub return position; } @Override public long getItemId(int position) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub return position; } @Override public View getView(int position, View convertView, ViewGroup parent) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub if (convertView == null) { convertView = inflater.inflate(R.layout.row_checklist_item, null); viewHolder = new ViewHolder(); viewHolder.checkListItem = (TextView) convertView .findViewById(R.id.tvCheckListItem); convertView.setTag(viewHolder); } else { viewHolder = (ViewHolder) convertView.getTag(); } viewHolder.checkListItem.setText(savedItems.get(position) .getDaily_list() + position); final int temp = position; return convertView; } } private class ViewHolder { TextView checkListItem; } @Override public void onItemClick(AdapterView<?> arg0, View arg1, int item, long arg3) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub // openDialog(savedItems.get(item).getDaily_name(), true, // savedItems.get(item).getDaily_id()); } }

    Read the article

  • Need help in Hashtable implementation

    - by rafael
    Hi all, i'm quite a beginner in C# , i tried to write a program that extract words from an entered string, the user has to enter a minimum length for the word to filter the words output ... my code doesn't look good or intuitive, i used two arrays countStr to store words , countArr to store word length corresponding to each word .. but the problem is i need to use hashtables instead of those two arrays , because both of their sizes are depending on the string length that the user enter , i think that's not too safe for the memory or something ? here's my humble code , again i'm trying to replace those two arrays with one hashtable , how can this be done ? using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Text; using System.Collections; namespace ConsoleApplication2 { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { int i = 0 ; int j = 0; string myString = ""; int counter = 0; int detCounter = 0; myString = Console.ReadLine(); string[] countStr = new string[myString.Length]; int[] countArr = new int[myString.Length]; Console.Write("Enter minimum word length:"); detCounter = int.Parse(Console.ReadLine()); for (i = 0; i < myString.Length; i++) { if (myString[i] != ' ') { counter++; countStr[j] += myString[i]; } else { countArr[j] = counter; counter = 0; j++; } } if (i == myString.Length) { countArr[j] = counter; } for (i = 0; i < myString.Length ; i++) { if (detCounter <= countArr[i]) { Console.WriteLine(countStr[i]); } } Console.ReadLine(); } } }

    Read the article

  • How to remove words based on a word count

    - by Chris
    Here is what I'm trying to accomplish. I have an object coming back from the database with a string description. This description can be up to 1000 characters long, but we only want to display a short view of this. So I coded up the following, but I'm having trouble in actually removing the number of words after the regular expression finds the total count of words. Does anyone have good way of dispalying the words which are less than the Regex.Matches? Thanks! if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(myObject.Description)) { string original = myObject.Description; MatchCollection wordColl = Regex.Matches(original, @"[\S]+"); if (wordColl.Count < 70) // 70 words? { uxDescriptionDisplay.Text = string.Format("<p>{0}</p>", myObject.Description); } else { string shortendText = original.Remove(200); // 200 characters? uxDescriptionDisplay.Text = string.Format("<p>{0}</p>", shortendText); } }

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137  | Next Page >