Search Results

Search found 37688 results on 1508 pages for 'site search'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 133/1508 | < Previous Page | 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140  | Next Page >

  • Lucene Search Returning Extra, Undesired Records

    - by Brandon
    I have a Lucene index that contains a field called 'Name'. I escape all special characters before inserting a value into my index using QueryParser.Escape(value). In my example I have 2 documents with the following names respectively: Test Test (Test) They get inserted into my index as such (I can confirm this using Luke): [test] [test] [\(test\)] I insert these values as TOKENIZED and using the StandardAnalyzer. When I perform a search, I use the QueryParser.Escape(searchString) against my search string input to escape special characters and then use the QueryParser with my 'Name' field and the StandardAnalyzer to perform my search. When I perform a search for 'Test', I get back both documents in my index (as expected). However, when I perform a search for 'Test (Test)', I am getting back both documents still. I realize that in both examples it matches on the 'test' term in the index, but I am confused in my 2nd example why it would not just pull back the document with the value of 'Test (Test)' because my search should create two terms: [test] and [\(test\)] I would imagine it would perform some sort of boolean operator where BOTH terms must match in that situation so I would get back just one record. Is there something I am missing or a trick to make the search behave as desired?

    Read the article

  • SharePoint replicating document between site according to external database on a regular basis

    - by kevin
    I want to copy a file from Site A to Site B according to external DB status on a timer job. e.g I have documents in Site A. I want to move those documents to Site B when the document' status in external MSSQL DB is "approved". I want to do it in a timer job. Which way will be great to do so ? I don't know how to use timer job and BDC job together. Please advice me. Thanks in advance. BTW, I don't know much about SharePoint.

    Read the article

  • Help getting PHP sessions to persist after being taken off-site

    - by Rob
    Hi, we're working on a payment gateway system with PHP. We use sessions to store the shopping cart data. The system takes you off-site to the payment processor's site, and then return you to your site. On most hosts, we have no issues when we arrive back at our site and having the session data still be there. On those with an issue, turning off the PHP session referer_check has worked in the past. We don't really want to have to include the PHPSESSID as a GET variable, and hope to avoid that. What I'm looking for is what other server configurations would cause the session to be killed, and any other workarounds there might be. Thanks for your help.

    Read the article

  • What CSS attribute stops my site squidging up?

    - by SLC
    I am looking at a website on the internet with the standard centered box design (the entire site is centered in a box and has a border each side). As you shrink it, the border gets smaller but the content stays the same size. This is fine. However on their site, once you get smaller still, you simply get scrollbars. The content remains untouched. On my site if you do this, things like text and links start to scroll onto multiple lines and the whole site gets broken. How can I keep it the same even when the viewport is small?

    Read the article

  • Share variable across site ASP.NET

    - by Anders
    I have a class isSearching with a single boolean property in a 'functions' file in my webapp. On my search page, I have a variable oSearchHandler declared as a Public Shared variable. How can I access the contents of oSearchHandler on other pages in my webapp? Code with Session.... 'search.aspx Public Function oSearchString(ByVal oTextBoxName As String) As String For Each oKey As String In Request.Form.AllKeys If oKey.Contains(oTextBoxName) Then Session.Add("searching", True) Session.Add("search-term", Request.Form(oKey)) Return Request.Form(oKey) End If Next Return "" End Function 'theMaster.master <% If Session("searching") Then %><ul style="float: right;"> <li> <div class="gsSearch"> <asp:TextBox ID="searchbox" runat="server"></asp:TextBox> </div> </li> <li> <div class="gsSearch"> <asp:Button ID="searchbutton" runat="server" Text="search" UseSubmitBehavior="true" PostBackUrl="search.aspx" CssClass="searchBtn" /> </div> </li> </ul> <% End If %> I think that the session will work just fine.

    Read the article

  • My search what the Cloud will mean for my Work, part 2

    - by Kay Sellenrode
    My experience with the cloud and why work will change and not disappear. Until now I have multiple experiences with the cloud, for the most good. i have worked on multiple cloud solutions in the past but let me describe them as 0.x versions. For me the 1st real serious cloud experience was a bit more than 1 year ago, when our company switched from an in house server to Microsoft BPOS as a complete replacement. Since we are a small consultancy firm and don’t have that much else to do than consulting, our IT requirements are quite simple. We need Mail and Storage space for our documents. With the in house server we had multiple outages during a year, mostly by lack of administering. Being consultants in the field and hardly having time to maintain a server, BPOS was and still is for us the right solution. Since the migration we have less outages and a much more robust solution. Have we run into issues with BPOS for our own environment? No not that I’m aware of. Based on this experience I made a stance about deploy ability of BPOS and cloud solutions, they are suitable for MKB (Dutch for Medium and Small Businesses). Most Small businesses don’t have the amount of work to hire a full time it admin. Hiring a service provider to maintain their own server might be even more costly than hiring an admin. So seeing the capabilities of BPOS and the needs of most businesses I see it as a great solution that gives the business a complete Server replacement solution for a fixed price per user. resulting in a clear budget for IT spending, something most small businesses were looking for, for a long time. So right now I’m deploying BPOS with a customer, and I run into some of the Cloud 1.0 issues. In my opinion BPOS is a good working Cloud version 1.0 solution. What do I mean with 1.0? Well 1.0 is mostly a tested solution (unlike 0.x versions) but still have quite some limitations caused by too few market experience. in my opnion this is also the reason why we don’t see that much BPOS customers yet and why I think Office 365 will make a huge difference. What I have seen of 365 shows me it is a Cloud 2.0 version, meaning it has all needed features and is much more flexible to the customer. This is also why I see changes happen in my work field, changes and not unemployment due to Cloud solutions. Cloud 1.0 solutions gave me the idea that if every customer would adopt them I would be out of work. But in reality Cloud 1.0 solutions are here just to set the market needs. The Cloud 2.0 and higher versions will give the customer much more flexibility, but also require the need for a consultant. Where the 1.0 versions are simple to setup and maintain, the 2.0 solution needs more thought upfront and afterwards. ie. BPOS in its 1.0 version brings you a very simplified Exchange 2007 solution, Suitable for some customers. Looking at Office 365 you receive almost a full blown Exchange 2010 solution. I expect this to be even more customizable in the next version. In my search for the changes to my work I try to regulary write a post with my thought around the Cloud and the impact on my work as a consultant. I'm also planning to present around this topic, so if anyone is interested to see me present around this topic, you're more than welcome to contact me.

    Read the article

  • Improving the running time of Breadth First Search and Adjacency List creation

    - by user45957
    We are given an array of integers where all elements are between 0-9. have to start from the 1st position and reach end in minimum no of moves such that we can from an index i move 1 position back and forward i.e i-1 and i+1 and jump to any index having the same value as index i. Time Limit : 1 second Max input size : 100000 I have tried to solve this problem use a single source shortest path approach using Breadth First Search and though BFS itself is O(V+E) and runs in time the adjacency list creation takes O(n2) time and therefore overall complexity becomes O(n2). is there any way i can decrease the time complexity of adjacency list creation? or is there a better and more efficient way of solving the problem? int main(){ vector<int> v; string str; vector<int> sets[10]; cin>>str; int in; for(int i=0;i<str.length();i++){ in=str[i]-'0'; v.push_back(in); sets[in].push_back(i); } int n=v.size(); if(n==1){ cout<<"0\n"; return 0; } if(v[0]==v[n-1]){ cout<<"1\n"; return 0; } vector<int> adj[100001]; for(int i=0;i<10;i++){ for(int j=0;j<sets[i].size();j++){ if(sets[i][j]>0) adj[sets[i][j]].push_back(sets[i][j]-1); if(sets[i][j]<n-1) adj[sets[i][j]].push_back(sets[i][j]+1); for(int k=j+1;k<sets[i].size();k++){ if(abs(sets[i][j]-sets[i][k])!=1){ adj[sets[i][j]].push_back(sets[i][k]); adj[sets[i][k]].push_back(sets[i][j]); } } } } queue<int> q; q.push(0); int dist[100001]; bool visited[100001]={false}; dist[0]=0; visited[0]=true; int c=0; while(!q.empty()){ int dq=q.front(); q.pop(); c++; for(int i=0;i<adj[dq].size();i++){ if(visited[adj[dq][i]]==false){ dist[adj[dq][i]]=dist[dq]+1; visited[adj[dq][i]]=true; q.push(adj[dq][i]); } } } cout<<dist[n-1]<<"\n"; return 0; }

    Read the article

  • Large Queries in Google

    - by marienbad
    I have a large query I want to do in google. It's just a string of OR's for the purpose of determining which search terms are ranked the highest compared to the others. It's not ABSURDLY large -- it's only 5,500 characters. But Google says: Request-URI Too Large The requested URL /search... is too large to process. Is there a way around?

    Read the article

  • How to mount a USB thumb drive as "Fixed" instead of "Removable"

    - by AMissico
    I have over 8 GB in my "Code Library" that I maintain on a 64 GB ScanDisk Ultra Backup USB Device. Windows Search 4.0 (installed on Windows XP) can index removable drives, but Windows 7 (which uses Windows Search 4.0) cannot, because the USB device identifies itself as a Removable drive and Windows 7 refuses to index removable drives. How can I mount the USB Thumb Drive as Fixed instead of Removable?

    Read the article

  • Enhanced Explorer for Windows XP? [closed]

    - by iceman
    Possible Duplicate: Replacement for Windows Explorer? Is there a better explorer for Windows XP with Konqueror-like features (like dual panes), etc. Specially an enhanced integrated search option like in Vista? There are different products which cumulatively present something similar like xplorer2, Google Desktop Search or Windows Grep. But what about one integrated product?

    Read the article

  • Searching within Gmail's nested labels [closed]

    - by Penang
    Consider this setup in my gmail inbox I have 3 lists mailing-lists/first-list mailing-lists/second-list mailing-lists/third-list if I want to search for all unread messages in any sublabel of mailing-lists, is there a better way to search than "is:unread label:mailing-list/first-list OR label:mailing-list/second-list OR label:mailing-list/third-list" something like "is:unread label:mailing-list/*" is what I'm looking for

    Read the article

  • Debugging iFilter plug-in (PDF indexing)

    - by Trevor Sullivan
    I have the official Adobe x64 iFilter PDF plug-in and the FoxIt Software iFilter PDF plug-in installed, and neither one seems to be allowing me to index the contents of PDF files. So far, I've: Added my data folder into the Indexing service configuration Ensured that PDF files are configured to index "file properties and contents" Rebuilt the index from scratch But, when I search, I can only search for PDF file names, not the contents of them. Any ideas on how to debug this issue?

    Read the article

  • How to Mount a USB "Thumb" Drive as "Fixed" in Windows (For Indexing)

    - by AMissico
    I have over 8GB in my "Code Library" that I maintain on a 64GB ScanDisk Ultra Backup USB Device. Windows Search 4.0 (installed on Windows XP) can index removable drives, but Windows 7 (which uses Windows Search 4.0) cannot because the USB device identifies itself as a Removable drive and Windows 7 refuses to index removable drives. How can I mount the USB Thumb Drive as Fixed instead of Removable? All suggestions welcome and greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • windows 7 start menu showing incorrect data

    - by madmik3
    Hi, I've tried to rebuild my search index but it does not seem to help. When i search for anything even command I either get an empty list or a list of short cuts with the names Programs Documents Files ... They all have the default white paper icon. If I click on them I get an error message that says Internet security settings prevented one or more files from being opened. Any ideas? thanks

    Read the article

  • Solr vs 'this' word

    - by s.arlashin
    There is a smal problem with solr. When I try to search text containing the word 'this' by issuing 'this' in the search console, solr doesn't find anything. However there are no problems with other words. Is it sort of reserved word or something like that?

    Read the article

  • Mark Shuttleworth s'excuse pour la mise en demeure contre le site FixUbuntu.com et les remarques concernant les détracteurs de MIR

    Mark Shuttleworth s'excuse pour la mise en demeure contre le site FixUbuntu.com et les remarques concernant les détracteurs de MIRSuite à la mise en demeure contre le site FixUbuntu.com pour violation de sa marque, Canonical, par la voix de son fondateur, Mark Shuttleworth, a ténu à présenter des excuses à Micah Lee, responsable du site.Pour rappel, Canonical reprochait à Micah Lee d'utiliser le nom « Ubuntu » et son logo, ce qui pouvait « conduire à une confusion ou une association de son site...

    Read the article

  • warning: dict_ldap_lookup: Search error 1: Operations error

    - by drecute
    Please I need help with ldap search filter to use to retrieve the user email information from ldap. I'm running postfix_ldap of Ubuntu server 12.04. Everything seems to work fine, except getting the values returned from the search. Version 1 server_host = ldap://samba.example.com search_base = dc=company, dc=example, dc=com query_filter = mail=%s bind = no domain = example.com Version 2 server_host = ldap://samba.example.com search_base = dc=company, dc=example, dc=com query_filter = mail=%s bind_dn = cn=Users,dc=company,dc=example,dc=com domain = example.com mail logs Nov 26 11:13:26 mail postfix/smtpd[19662]: match_string: example.com ~? example.com Nov 26 11:13:26 mail postfix/smtpd[19662]: dict_ldap_lookup: No existing connection for LDAP source /etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf, reopening Nov 26 11:13:26 mail postfix/smtpd[19662]: dict_ldap_connect: Connecting to server ldap://samba.example.com Nov 26 11:13:26 mail postfix/smtpd[19662]: dict_ldap_connect: Actual Protocol version used is 3. Nov 26 11:13:26 mail postfix/smtpd[19662]: dict_ldap_connect: Binding to server ldap://samba.example.com with dn cn=Users,dc=company,dc=example,dc=com Nov 26 11:13:26 mail postfix/smtpd[19662]: warning: dict_ldap_connect: Unable to bind to server ldap://samba.example.com with dn cn=Users,dc=company,dc=example,dc=com: 49 (Invalid credentials) Nov 26 11:13:26 mail postfix/smtpd[19662]: warning: ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf lookup error for "[email protected]" Nov 26 11:13:26 mail postfix/smtpd[19662]: maps_find: virtual_alias_maps: [email protected]: search aborted Nov 26 11:13:26 mail postfix/smtpd[19662]: mail_addr_find: [email protected] -> (try again) Nov 26 11:13:26 mail postfix/smtpd[19662]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from col0-omc3-s2.col0.hotmail.com[65.55.34.140]: 451 4.3.0 <[email protected]>: Temporary lookup failure; from=<[email protected]> to=<[email protected]> proto=ESMTP helo=<col0-omc3-s2.col0.hotmail.com> Nov 26 11:13:26 mail postfix/smtpd[19662]: > col0-omc3-s2.col0.hotmail.com[65.55.34.140]: 451 4.3.0 <[email protected]>: Temporary lookup failure here's another log with successful search result but fialed to get the values of the result Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: dict_ldap_lookup: Using existing connection for LDAP source /etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: dict_ldap_lookup: /etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf: Searching with filter [email protected] Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: dict_ldap_get_values[1]: Search found 1 match(es) Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: dict_ldap_get_values[1]: Leaving dict_ldap_get_values Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: dict_ldap_lookup: Search returned nothing Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: maps_find: virtual_alias_maps: [email protected]: not found Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: dict_ldap_lookup: In dict_ldap_lookup Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: dict_ldap_lookup: /etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf: Skipping lookup of key 'tola.akintola': domain mismatch Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: maps_find: virtual_alias_maps: tola.akintola: not found Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: dict_ldap_lookup: In dict_ldap_lookup Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: dict_ldap_lookup: /etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf: Skipping lookup of key '@example.com': domain mismatch Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: maps_find: virtual_alias_maps: @example.com: not found Nov 26 12:04:56 mail postfix/smtpd[20463]: mail_addr_find: [email protected] -> (not found) My refined ldap-aliases.cf looks like this: server_host = ldap://samba.example.com server_port = 3268 search_base = dc=company, dc=example, dc=com query_filter = mail=%s result_attribute = uid bind_dn = cn=Administrator,cn=Users,dc=company,dc=example,dc=com bind_pw = pass domain = example.com So I'll like to know what ldap filter is appropriate to get this to work. Thanks for helping out.

    Read the article

  • How to setup Lucene/Solr for a B2B web app?

    - by Bill Paetzke
    Given: 1 database per client (business customer) 5000 clients Clients have between 2 to 2000 users (avg is ~100 users/client) 100k to 10 million records per database Users need to search those records often (it's the best way to navigate their data) Possibly relevant info: Several new clients each week (any time during business hours) Multiple web servers and database servers (users can login via any web server) Let's stay agnostic of language or sql brand, since Lucene (and Solr) have a breadth of support For Example: Joel Spolsky said in Podcast #11 that his hosted web app product, FogBugz On-Demand, uses Lucene. He has thousands of on-demand clients. And each client gets their own database. They use an index per client and store it in the client's database. I'm not sure on the details. And I'm not sure if this is a serious mod to Lucene. The Question: How would you setup Lucene search so that each client can only search within its database? How would you setup the index(es)? Where do you store the index(es)? Would you need to add a filter to all search queries? If a client cancelled, how would you delete their (part of the) index? (this may be trivial--not sure yet) Possible Solutions: Make an index for each client (database) Pro: Search is faster (than one-index-for-all method). Indices are relative to the size of the client's data. Con: I'm not sure what this entails, nor do I know if this is beyond Lucene's scope. Have a single, gigantic index with a database_name field. Always include database_name as a filter. Pro: Not sure. Maybe good for tech support or billing dept to search all databases for info. Con: Search is slower (than index-per-client method). Flawed security if query filter removed. One last thing: I would also accept an answer that uses Solr (the extension of Lucene). Perhaps it's better suited for this problem. Not sure.

    Read the article

  • nginx php-fpm empty site

    - by Katafalkas
    I am writing this as I was stuck trying to fix it whole night. We have recently migrated to a new server. Before migration we have been running our site on nginx + cgi (script). After migration we decided to try apache + mod_php. It was rather terrible, and I would like to migrate back to nginx, but this time I want it with php-fpm (as people say its a cool) So I did follow a number of guides and I think i done everything correctly. As well as that I have our old config files for "server" section, which i reviewed and places into new config. So I ended up having an empty site when I enter our URL. (By empty I mean blank page, no letter, errors or anything at all.) In the access log there are some weird errors like: 123.242.148.54 - - [22/Mar/2012:06:08:11 +0200] "-" 400 0 "-" "-" My guess is that php-fpm is not working, but not sure how to confirm it. Maybe some1 could give some help ? Would much appreciate. my nginx config: user nginx; worker_processes 12; error_log /var/log/nginx/error.log; #error_log /var/log/nginx/error.log notice; #error_log /var/log/nginx/error.log info; pid /var/run/nginx.pid; events { worker_connections 4096; } http { include /etc/nginx/mime.types; #default_type application/octet-stream; log_format main '$remote_addr - $remote_user [$time_local] "$request" ' '$status $body_bytes_sent "$http_referer" ' '"$http_user_agent" "$http_x_forwarded_for"'; access_log /var/log/nginx/access.log main; sendfile on; #tcp_nopush on; #keepalive_timeout 0; keepalive_timeout 65; tcp_nodelay on; gzip on; gzip_disable "MSIE [1-6]\.(?!.*SV1)"; fastcgi_buffer_size 256k; fastcgi_buffers 4 256k; server { listen 80; server_name www.example.com; access_log /var/log/nginx/example.access.log; error_log /var/log/nginx/error.log; root /home/www/example; index index.php; client_max_body_size 50M; #error_page 404 /404.html; # phpMyAdmin location /phpmyadmin { root /usr/share/; error_log /var/log/nginx/phpmyadmin.log; try_files $uri $uri/ /index.php; } location ~ ^/phpmyadmin/.*\.php$ { root /usr/share/; error_log /var/log/nginx/phpmyadmin.log; include /etc/nginx/fastcgi_params; fastcgi_pass 127.0.0.1:9000; } # Munin location /monitoring { root /var/www/; auth_basic "Restricted"; auth_basic_user_file /etc/nginx/conf.d/monitoring_users; error_log /var/log/nginx/monitoring.log; index index.html; } # The site location / { try_files $uri $uri/ /index.php/?$uri&$args; } # PHP interpreter location ~ \.php { include /etc/nginx/fastcgi_params; fastcgi_pass 127.0.0.1:9000; } }

    Read the article

  • problem in publishing

    - by girish
    when i am publishing my .net website on my domain it is showing the directory of files when i open my site .. anyone please tell me how to avoid this and make my website open mu home page .

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140  | Next Page >