Search Results

Search found 19055 results on 763 pages for 'high performance'.

Page 14/763 | < Previous Page | 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21  | Next Page >

• General video performance affected on Mac OSX 10.5 (PowerBook G4)

  - by r0ca

  Hi all, I'm quite new to Mac and I just got a PowerBook G4 for free. I installed OSX 10.5 on it and for the first two weeks, everything was going kinda smooth even if this is similar to a P3. I'm not expecting awsome video performance but at least be able to watch some videos from Youtube. Yesterday night, I installed Office 2008 for mac and this morning, even after a reboot, my computer is way much slower that I used to know. I watched a youtube video and the framerate was 1:1. I also noticed it on flash adds, it's way slower! Is there anything that I can do to increase video performance, see what's the process list running and taking more GPU or CPU, what's taking more ram and stuff like that?! What do you guys, Mac pros, would do on an old laptop with OSX 10.5 Thanks!

  Read the article

• Analyzing Linux NFS server performance

  - by Kamil Kisiel

  I'd like to do some analysis of our NFS server to help track down potential bottlenecks in our applications. The server is running SUSE Enterprise Linux 10. The kind of things I'm looking to know are: Which files are being accessed by which clients Read/write throughput on a per-client basis Overhead imposed by other RPC calls Time spent waiting on other NFS requests, or disk I/O, to service a client I already know about the statistics available in /proc/net/rpc/nfsd and in fact I wrote a blog post describing them in depth. What I'm looking for is a way to dig deeper and help understand what factors are contributing to the performance seen by a particular client. I want to analyze the role the NFS server plays in the performance of an application on our cluster so that I can think of ways to best optimize it.

  Read the article

• RAID10 without write-back cache = horrible write performance?

  - by Harry Mexican

  I have just provisioned a dedicated server on singlehop. I'm running it through some tests to know what to expect performance-wise. On the I/O side (with 4 1TB disks in RAID 10) I get: write-cache disabled 200 MB/s read throughput 30 MB/s write throughput I thought that was really low compared to my desktop HD which gets 150-150 or so. So I had a chat with them and they suggested enabling the write cache. New results: write-cache enabled 280 MB/s read 260 MB/s write which is great and all but means I'd have to add a BBU for an additional monthly cost. Is it normal for the write throughput to be 1/4 of a regular drive on RAID10, if you don't have write cache? It almost feels like its intentionally bad to force you to pony up for the BBU. I'd be happy with normal non-raid performance of 150/150.

  Read the article

• monitoring TCP/IP performance on Solaris

  - by Andy Faibishenko

  I am trying to tune a high message traffic system running on Solaris. The architecture is a large number (600) of clients which connect via TCP to a big Solaris server and then send/receive relatively small messages (.5 to 1K payload) at high rates. The goal is to minimize the latency of each message processed. I suspect that the TCP stack of the server is getting overwhelmed by all the traffic. What are some commands/metrics that I can use to confirm this, and in case this is true, what is the best way to alleviate this bottleneck?

  Read the article

• performance block countries using iptables /netfilter

  - by markus

  It's easy to block IPs from country using iptables (e.g. like http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/block-entier-country-using-iptables/). However I read that the performance can go down if the deny list get too large. An alternative is installing the iptables geoip patch or using ipset ( http://www.jsimmons.co.uk/2010/06/08/using-ipset-with-iptables-in-ubuntu-lts-1004-to-block-large-ip-ranges/) instead of iptables. Does anyone have experience with the various approaches and can say something about the performance differences ? Are there are other ways to block country IPs in linux which I did't mentioned above?

  Read the article

• Determining Performance Limits

  - by JeffV

  I have a number of windows processes that pass messages between them hat a high rate using tcp to local host. Aside from testing on actual hardware how can I assess what my hardware limit will be. These applications are not doing CPU intensive work, mostly decomposing and combining messages, scanning over them for special flag in the data etc.. The message size is typically 3k and the rate is typically ~10k messages per second. ~30MB per second between processing stages. There may be 10 or more stages depending. For this type of application, what should I look to for assessing performance? What do I look for in a server performance wise? I am currently running an XEON L5408 with 32 GB ram. But I am assuming cache is more important than actual ram size as I am barely touching the ram.

  Read the article

• Does shutdown idle VMs improve the performance?

  - by Samselvaprabu

  Often our team members are coming to me with a compliant that their VMs are slow. Our team members suggested to shutdown some of the VMs temporarily and try to access the VM. But most cases that would not help. Assume that i have assigned 4 GB for and 2 CPUs for my VM. So ideally it should not face performance issue. As our ESXi 4.1 server has multiple VM in the same server (we have overcommited memory and CPU). Does shut down other VM really helps to improve performance or not? [Note : We are using ESXi 4.1 and our hardware is R710 server. We have more number of VMs in single server so we have overcommited memory.]

  Read the article

• Strange performance from RAID5 using WD RE4 disks

  - by Howard

  I've noticed a bit of a performance issue with some WD RE4 drives I'm using under AMD's hardware RAID solution. First a bit of background: Environment: Windows 7 home premium x64 HDD's: 3x 1TB WD Raid Edition 4 in a RAID 5 setup with 128 kbyte stripe (2TB usable space) Testing Tool: HD Tune, process set to "High Priority" Processor: AMD Phenom II x6 1100T Ram: 16GB DDR3/1600mhz Motherboard: MSI 970A-G45 The image below pretty much depicts the issue I'm having. Every test has the same thing, a period of similar length where the performance drops to a few megabytes a second. This can't be a TLER issue as the purpose of RE4's is to work around that. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Read the article

• Solaris TCP/IP performance tuning

  - by Andy Faibishenko

  I am trying to tune a high message traffic system running on Solaris. The architecture is a large number (600) of clients which connect via TCP to a big Solaris server and then send/receive relatively small messages (.5 to 1K payload) at high rates. The goal is to minimize the latency of each message processed. I suspect that the TCP stack of the server is getting overwhelmed by all the traffic. What are some commands/metrics that I can use to confirm this, and in case this is true, what is the best way to alleviate this bottleneck? PS I posted this on StackOverflow originally. One person suggested snoop and dtrace. dtrace seems pretty general - are there any additional pointers on how to use it to diagnose TCP issues?

  Read the article

• monitoring TCP/IP performance on Solaris

  - by Andy Faibishenko

  I am trying to tune a high message traffic system running on Solaris. The architecture is a large number (600) of clients which connect via TCP to a big Solaris server and then send/receive relatively small messages (.5 to 1K payload) at high rates. The goal is to minimize the latency of each message processed. I suspect that the TCP stack of the server is getting overwhelmed by all the traffic. What are some commands/metrics that I can use to confirm this, and in case this is true, what is the best way to alleviate this bottleneck?

  Read the article

• Difference between all servers in one cluster and more than one cluster with servers?

  - by silla

  Not sure I understand what´s the difference or how it works when servers a running in one cluster or if there are more than one clusters with servers in it - regard High availability & Load Balancing. For me they are somehow the same, there is not really a big difference. Let´s make a simple example: 2 Servers in 1 Cluster 2 Clusters with each 1 Server - 1. If one Server failure, the other one is able to continue the work. The same for Load Balancing, these two Servers are able to balance the work together. - 2. The same thing! If one Server failure... The only thing that could be a problem with point 1. is if the Cluster fails (then both of the Server are dead). But is this even possible? I was reading stuff about clustering and high availability but I think I do not get this really. Probably I did not really understand how a cluster is working. Are these 2 points with 1 Cluster and 2 Clusters somehow the same or are there really some big differences? What should I know about it? Thank you

  Read the article

• High apache load but little traffic logged

  - by nrambeck

  I recently installed Varnish to sit in front of Apache on a dedicated server running a single site. It appears to be working well, but the load on Apache is still very high. What doesn't make sense is that the Apache access log shows almost no traffic getting past Varnish. When I tail the apache log I see about 1-3 hits per second come through. Here is what the load on Apache looks like : USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND apache 13834 8.1 1.0 107716 34164 ? S 08:24 0:02 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 13835 8.1 1.0 107716 33856 ? S 08:24 0:02 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 11483 7.9 0.9 105916 30788 ? S 08:23 0:06 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 12255 7.5 1.0 107476 33312 ? S 08:24 0:04 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 9340 7.2 1.1 107732 34916 ? R 08:23 0:09 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 12029 6.8 0.9 106908 30416 ? S 08:24 0:04 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 11577 6.7 1.0 107192 34180 ? S 08:24 0:05 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 11486 6.6 1.0 106176 33112 ? S 08:23 0:05 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 11796 6.4 1.0 106936 31916 ? S 08:24 0:04 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 13815 6.3 1.0 107988 34464 ? S 08:24 0:02 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 18089 6.3 1.3 107444 43212 ? S 08:11 0:52 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 11797 5.9 1.0 107716 34580 ? S 08:24 0:04 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7655 5.9 0.0 0 0 ? Z 08:22 0:09 [httpd] <defunct> mysql 8033 5.9 6.2 318240 199512 ? Sl May14 352:34 /usr/libexec/mysqld --basedir=/usr --datadir=/var/lib/mysql --user=mysql --pid-file=/va apache 11488 5.8 0.9 106924 31632 ? S 08:23 0:04 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 9375 5.7 1.1 106956 35552 ? S 08:23 0:07 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 3551 5.6 1.1 106956 36140 ? S 08:20 0:14 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7657 5.6 1.0 106968 32472 ? S 08:22 0:09 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 11433 5.6 1.0 107716 34396 ? S 08:23 0:04 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 5505 5.5 1.1 106944 34924 ? S 08:21 0:12 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7172 5.3 1.1 106972 35368 ? S 08:22 0:09 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 10088 5.2 0.9 106160 31240 ? S 08:23 0:04 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 7656 5.1 1.0 106436 34388 ? S 08:22 0:08 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 3468 5.0 1.1 107716 35968 ? S 08:20 0:13 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 14242 4.8 1.0 107728 33032 ? S 08:25 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 3578 4.8 1.1 107988 35964 ? S 08:20 0:12 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 28192 4.8 1.2 106944 38060 ? S 08:17 0:23 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 3277 4.6 1.1 106956 35688 ? S 08:20 0:13 /usr/sbin/httpd apache 15434 3.7 0.7 106908 24684 ? S 08:25 0:00 /usr/sbin/httpd There is a default apache log and then one other VirtualHost log setup. I'm concerned that Apache is handling some kind of traffic that is not being logged. Is that possible? And is there anything I can do to capture that traffic?

  Read the article

• Determining cause of high NFS/IO utilization without iotop

  - by Matt

  I have a server that is doing an NFSv4 export for user's home directories. There are roughly 25 users (mostly developers/analysts) and about 40 servers mounting the home directory export. Performance is miserable, with users often seeing multi-second lags for simple commands (like ls, or writing a small text file). Sometimes the home directory mount completely hangs for minutes, with users getting "permission denied" errors. The hardware is a Dell R510 with dual E5620 CPUs and 8 GB RAM. There are eight 15k 2.5” 600 GB drives (Seagate ST3600057SS) configured in hardware RAID-6 with a single hot spare. RAID controller is a Dell PERC H700 w/512MB cache (Linux sees this as a LSI MegaSAS 9260). OS is CentOS 5.6, home directory partition is ext3, with options “rw,data=journal,usrquota”. I have the HW RAID configured to present two virtual disks to the OS: /dev/sda for the OS (boot, root and swap partitions), and /dev/sdb for the home directories. What I find curious, and suspicious, is that the sda device often has very high utilization, even though it only contains the OS. I would expect this virtual drive to be idle almost all the time. The system is not swapping, according to "free" and "vmstat". Why would there be major load on this device? Here is a 30-second snapshot from iostat: Time: 09:37:28 AM Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util sda 0.00 44.09 0.03 107.76 0.13 607.40 11.27 0.89 8.27 7.27 78.35 sda1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 sda2 0.00 44.09 0.03 107.76 0.13 607.40 11.27 0.89 8.27 7.27 78.35 sdb 0.00 2616.53 0.67 157.88 2.80 11098.83 140.04 8.57 54.08 4.21 66.68 sdb1 0.00 2616.53 0.67 157.88 2.80 11098.83 140.04 8.57 54.08 4.21 66.68 dm-0 0.00 0.00 0.03 151.82 0.13 607.26 8.00 1.25 8.23 5.16 78.35 dm-1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dm-2 0.00 0.00 0.67 2774.84 2.80 11099.37 8.00 474.30 170.89 0.24 66.84 dm-3 0.00 0.00 0.67 2774.84 2.80 11099.37 8.00 474.30 170.89 0.24 66.84 Looks like iotop is the ideal tool to use to sniff out these kinds of issues. But I'm on CentOS 5.6, which doesn't have a new enough kernel to support that program. I looked at Determining which process is causing heavy disk I/O?, and besides iotop, one of the suggestions said to do a "echo 1 /proc/sys/vm/block_dump". I did that (after directing kernel messages to tempfs). In about 13 minutes I had about 700k reads or writes, roughly half from kjournald and the other half from nfsd: # egrep " kernel: .*(READ|WRITE)" messages | wc -l 768439 # egrep " kernel: kjournald.*(READ|WRITE)" messages | wc -l 403615 # egrep " kernel: nfsd.*(READ|WRITE)" messages | wc -l 314028 For what it's worth, for the last hour, utilization has constantly been over 90% for the home directory drive. My 30-second iostat keeps showing output like this: Time: 09:36:30 PM Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rkB/s wkB/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util sda 0.00 6.46 0.20 11.33 0.80 71.71 12.58 0.24 20.53 14.37 16.56 sda1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 sda2 0.00 6.46 0.20 11.33 0.80 71.71 12.58 0.24 20.53 14.37 16.56 sdb 137.29 7.00 549.92 3.80 22817.19 43.19 82.57 3.02 5.45 1.74 96.32 sdb1 137.29 7.00 549.92 3.80 22817.19 43.19 82.57 3.02 5.45 1.74 96.32 dm-0 0.00 0.00 0.20 17.76 0.80 71.04 8.00 0.38 21.21 9.22 16.57 dm-1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 dm-2 0.00 0.00 687.47 10.80 22817.19 43.19 65.48 4.62 6.61 1.43 99.81 dm-3 0.00 0.00 687.47 10.80 22817.19 43.19 65.48 4.62 6.61 1.43 99.82

  Read the article

• OBIEE 11.1.1 - (Updated) Best Practices Guide for Tuning Oracle® Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition (Whitepaper)

  - by Ahmed Awan

  Applies To: This whitepaper applies to OBIEE release 11.1.1.3, 11.1.1.5 and 11.1.1.6 Introduction: One of the most challenging aspects of performance tuning is knowing where to begin. To maximize Oracle® Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition performance, you need to monitor, analyze, and tune all the Fusion Middleware / BI components. This guide describes the tools that you can use to monitor performance and the techniques for optimizing the performance of Oracle® Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition components. Click to Download the OBIEE Infrastructure Tuning Whitepaper (Right click or option-click the link and choose "Save As..." to download this file) Disclaimer: All tuning information stated in this guide is only for orientation, every modification has to be tested and its impact should be monitored and analyzed. Before implementing any of the tuning settings, it is recommended to carry out end to end performance testing that will also include to obtain baseline performance data for the default configurations, make incremental changes to the tuning settings and then collect performance data. Otherwise it may worse the system performance.

  Read the article

• Why does Chrome video performance substantially degrade after waking from suspend in 10.10?

  - by Grant Heaslip

  Note: For some more details, some of which may not be true given what I've figured out, see this post. When I first boot my computer, video performance (both native H.264 HTML5 in YouTube and Vimeo, and in Flash) in Chrome is perfectly reasonable. CPU usage stays slow, everything works correctly, and the video is silky-smooth. But for whatever reason, if I suspend my computer then wake it up, video performance plummets. Full screen HTML5 video is choppy at best, and full-screen Flash video basically brings my computer to its knees (I'm talking less than a frame a second, and a 5 second lead time to leave full-screen after hitting Esc). Restarting Chrome doesn't fix this — I need to completely restart my machine before performance goes back to normal. Video performance in other applications, such as Movie Player, doesn't seem to be affected at all by the suspend cycle — it's only Chrome. I'm using a Lenovo X201, with an Intel GMA HD graphics chipset, and Intel compnents all around (I don't need any proprietary drivers). This didn't happen in 10.04, and I haven't anything that I think would have caused this to happen. It's possible that a Chrome release could have caused this, but it seems less likely than a regression between 10.04 and 10.10. Any ideas? EDIT: In response Georg's comment, logging in and out doesn't fix it. Restarting Compiz or switching to Metacity (at least by using "compiz/metacity --replace & disown" — am I doing it right?) doesn't help (actually, it seemed to help somewhat with Flash once, but I haven't been able to reproduce this). I'm not sure about GDM — when I use "sudo restart gdm" I get kicked back to the Linux shell (?), which I have no idea how to get out of. Also, I want to make very clear that this isn't just a case of Flash sucking (it does,but that's beside the point). I"m seeing the same general problem with HTML5 videos, and Flash is performing better on my Nexus One than it does on my Core i5 laptop. There's something screwy going on with Chrome and/or 10.10.

  Read the article

• Books or resources for high-loaded sites.

  - by Alex

  Currently I'm developing high-loaded financial portal(we use LAMP to run our project). There are great number of incoming data to be processed and stored. So optimization tasks become very important for us. Could you suggest books, articles or resources, that discover optimization questions (especially bboks). NOTE: At the moment I'm reading great book High Performance MySQL, but besides I want to know other facilities of optimization.

  Read the article

• About High Availabiltity

  - by Invincible

  I know this is not perfect place to ask this question. Can anybody suggest some good resource or book on High-Availability? I want to learn as much as I can on high-availability before start building my system. Thanks in advance!

  Read the article

• httpd high cpu usage slowing down server response

  - by max

  my client has a image sharing website with about 100.000 visitor per day it has been slowed down considerably since this morning when i checked processes i've notice high cpu usage from http .... some has suggested ddos attack ... i'm not a webmaster and i've no idea whts going on top top - 20:13:30 up 5:04, 4 users, load average: 4.56, 4.69, 4.59 Tasks: 284 total, 3 running, 281 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie Cpu(s): 12.1%us, 0.9%sy, 1.7%ni, 69.0%id, 16.4%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Mem: 16037152k total, 15875096k used, 162056k free, 360468k buffers Swap: 4194288k total, 888k used, 4193400k free, 14050008k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 4151 apache 20 0 277m 84m 3784 R 50.2 0.5 0:01.98 httpd 4115 apache 20 0 210m 16m 4480 S 18.3 0.1 0:00.60 httpd 12885 root 39 19 4296 692 308 S 13.0 0.0 11:09.53 gzip 4177 apache 20 0 214m 20m 3700 R 12.3 0.1 0:00.37 httpd 2219 mysql 20 0 4257m 198m 5668 S 11.0 1.3 42:49.70 mysqld 3691 apache 20 0 206m 14m 6416 S 1.7 0.1 0:03.38 httpd 3934 apache 20 0 211m 17m 4836 S 1.0 0.1 0:03.61 httpd 4098 apache 20 0 209m 17m 3912 S 1.0 0.1 0:04.17 httpd 4116 apache 20 0 211m 17m 4476 S 1.0 0.1 0:00.43 httpd 3867 apache 20 0 217m 23m 4672 S 0.7 0.1 1:03.87 httpd 4146 apache 20 0 209m 15m 3628 S 0.7 0.1 0:00.02 httpd 4149 apache 20 0 209m 15m 3616 S 0.7 0.1 0:00.02 httpd 12884 root 39 19 22336 2356 944 D 0.7 0.0 0:19.21 tar 4054 apache 20 0 206m 12m 4576 S 0.3 0.1 0:00.32 httpd another top top - 15:46:45 up 5:08, 4 users, load average: 5.02, 4.81, 4.64 Tasks: 288 total, 6 running, 281 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie Cpu(s): 18.4%us, 0.9%sy, 2.3%ni, 56.5%id, 21.8%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st Mem: 16037152k total, 15792196k used, 244956k free, 360924k buffers Swap: 4194288k total, 888k used, 4193400k free, 13983368k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 4622 apache 20 0 209m 16m 3868 S 54.2 0.1 0:03.99 httpd 4514 apache 20 0 213m 20m 3924 R 50.8 0.1 0:04.93 httpd 4627 apache 20 0 221m 27m 4560 R 18.9 0.2 0:01.20 httpd 12885 root 39 19 4296 692 308 S 18.9 0.0 11:51.79 gzip 2219 mysql 20 0 4257m 199m 5668 S 18.3 1.3 43:19.04 mysqld 4512 apache 20 0 227m 33m 4736 R 5.6 0.2 0:01.93 httpd 4520 apache 20 0 213m 19m 4640 S 1.3 0.1 0:01.48 httpd 4590 apache 20 0 212m 19m 3932 S 1.3 0.1 0:00.06 httpd 4573 apache 20 0 210m 16m 3556 R 1.0 0.1 0:00.03 httpd 4562 root 20 0 15164 1388 952 R 0.7 0.0 0:00.08 top 98 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.3 0.0 0:04.89 kswapd0 100 root 39 19 0 0 0 S 0.3 0.0 0:02.85 khugepaged 4579 apache 20 0 209m 16m 3900 S 0.3 0.1 0:00.83 httpd 4637 apache 20 0 209m 15m 3668 S 0.3 0.1 0:00.03 httpd ps aux [root@server ~]# ps aux | grep httpd root 2236 0.0 0.0 207524 10124 ? Ss 15:09 0:03 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3087 2.7 0.1 226968 28232 ? S 20:04 0:06 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3170 2.6 0.1 221296 22292 ? R 20:05 0:05 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3171 9.0 0.1 225044 26768 ? R 20:05 0:17 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3188 1.5 0.1 223644 24724 ? S 20:05 0:03 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3197 2.3 0.1 215908 17520 ? S 20:05 0:04 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3198 1.1 0.0 211700 13000 ? S 20:05 0:02 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3272 2.4 0.1 219960 21540 ? S 20:06 0:03 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3273 2.0 0.0 211600 12804 ? S 20:06 0:03 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3279 3.7 0.1 229024 29900 ? S 20:06 0:05 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3280 1.2 0.0 0 0 ? Z 20:06 0:01 [httpd] <defun ct> apache 3285 2.9 0.1 218532 21604 ? S 20:06 0:04 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3287 30.5 0.4 265084 65948 ? R 20:06 0:43 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3297 1.9 0.1 216068 17332 ? S 20:06 0:02 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3342 2.7 0.1 216716 17828 ? S 20:06 0:03 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3356 1.6 0.1 217244 18296 ? S 20:07 0:01 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3365 6.4 0.1 226044 27428 ? S 20:07 0:06 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3396 0.0 0.1 213844 16120 ? S 20:07 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3399 5.8 0.1 215664 16772 ? S 20:07 0:05 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3422 0.7 0.1 214860 17380 ? S 20:07 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3435 3.3 0.1 216220 17460 ? S 20:07 0:02 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3463 0.1 0.0 212732 15076 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3492 0.0 0.0 207660 7552 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3493 1.4 0.1 218092 19188 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3500 1.9 0.1 224204 26100 ? R 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3501 1.7 0.1 216916 17916 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3502 0.0 0.0 207796 7732 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3505 0.0 0.0 207660 7548 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3529 0.0 0.0 207660 7524 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3531 4.0 0.1 216180 17280 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3532 0.0 0.0 207656 7464 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3543 1.4 0.1 217088 18648 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3544 0.0 0.0 207656 7548 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3545 0.0 0.0 207656 7560 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3546 0.0 0.0 207660 7540 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3547 0.0 0.0 207660 7544 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3548 2.3 0.1 216904 17888 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3550 0.0 0.0 207660 7540 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3551 0.0 0.0 207660 7536 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3552 0.2 0.0 214104 15972 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3553 6.5 0.1 216740 17712 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3554 6.3 0.1 216156 17260 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3555 0.0 0.0 207796 7716 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3556 1.8 0.0 211588 12580 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3557 0.0 0.0 207660 7544 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3565 0.0 0.0 207660 7520 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3570 0.0 0.0 207660 7516 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL apache 3571 0.0 0.0 207660 7504 ? S 20:08 0:00 /usr/sbin/http d -k start -DSSL root 3577 0.0 0.0 103316 860 pts/2 S+ 20:08 0:00 grep httpd httpd error log [Mon Jul 01 18:53:38 2013] [error] [client 2.178.12.67] request failed: error reading the headers, referer: http://akstube.com/image/show/27023/%D9%86%DB%8C%D9%88%D8%B4%D8%A7-%D8%B6%DB%8C%D8%BA%D9%85%DB%8C-%D9%88-%D8%AE%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%87%D8%B1-%D9%88-%D9%87%D9%85%D8%B3%D8%B1%D8%B4 [Mon Jul 01 18:55:33 2013] [error] [client 91.229.215.240] request failed: error reading the headers, referer: http://akstube.com/image/show/44924 [Mon Jul 01 18:57:02 2013] [error] [client 2.178.12.67] Invalid method in request [Mon Jul 01 18:57:02 2013] [error] [client 2.178.12.67] File does not exist: /var/www/html/501.shtml [Mon Jul 01 19:21:36 2013] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] client denied by server configuration: /var/www/html/server-status [Mon Jul 01 19:21:36 2013] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File does not exist: /var/www/html/403.shtml [Mon Jul 01 19:23:57 2013] [error] [client 151.242.14.31] request failed: error reading the headers [Mon Jul 01 19:37:16 2013] [error] [client 2.190.16.65] request failed: error reading the headers [Mon Jul 01 19:56:00 2013] [error] [client 151.242.14.31] request failed: error reading the headers Not a JPEG file: starts with 0x89 0x50 also there is lots of these in the messages log Jul 1 20:15:47 server named[2426]: client 203.88.6.9#11926: query (cache) 'www.xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 20:15:47 server named[2426]: client 203.88.6.9#26255: query (cache) 'www.xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 20:15:48 server named[2426]: client 203.88.6.9#20093: query (cache) 'www.xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 20:15:48 server named[2426]: client 203.88.6.9#8672: query (cache) 'www.xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:07 server named[2426]: client 203.88.6.9#39352: query (cache) 'www.xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:08 server named[2426]: client 203.88.6.9#25382: query (cache) 'www.xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:08 server named[2426]: client 203.88.6.9#9064: query (cache) 'www.xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:09 server named[2426]: client 203.88.23.9#35375: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:09 server named[2426]: client 203.88.6.9#61932: query (cache) 'www.xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:09 server named[2426]: client 203.88.23.9#4423: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:09 server named[2426]: client 203.88.6.9#40229: query (cache) 'www.xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:14 server named[2426]: client 203.88.23.9#46128: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:14 server named[2426]: client 203.88.6.10#62128: query (cache) 'www.xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:14 server named[2426]: client 203.88.23.9#35240: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:14 server named[2426]: client 203.88.6.10#36774: query (cache) 'www.xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:14 server named[2426]: client 203.88.23.9#28361: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:14 server named[2426]: client 203.88.6.10#14970: query (cache) 'www.xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:14 server named[2426]: client 203.88.23.9#20216: query (cache) 'www.xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:14 server named[2426]: client 203.88.23.10#31794: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:14 server named[2426]: client 203.88.23.9#23042: query (cache) 'www.xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:14 server named[2426]: client 203.88.6.10#11333: query (cache) 'www.xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:14 server named[2426]: client 203.88.23.10#41807: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:14 server named[2426]: client 203.88.23.9#20092: query (cache) 'www.xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:14 server named[2426]: client 203.88.6.10#43526: query (cache) 'www.xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:15 server named[2426]: client 203.88.23.9#17173: query (cache) 'www.xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:15 server named[2426]: client 203.88.23.9#62412: query (cache) 'www.xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:15 server named[2426]: client 203.88.23.10#63961: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:15 server named[2426]: client 203.88.23.10#64345: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:15 server named[2426]: client 203.88.23.10#31030: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:16 server named[2426]: client 203.88.6.9#17098: query (cache) 'www.xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:16 server named[2426]: client 203.88.6.9#17197: query (cache) 'www.xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:16 server named[2426]: client 203.88.6.9#18114: query (cache) 'www.xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:16 server named[2426]: client 203.88.6.9#59138: query (cache) 'www.xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:45:17 server named[2426]: client 203.88.6.9#28715: query (cache) 'www.xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:48:33 server named[2426]: client 203.88.23.9#26355: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:48:34 server named[2426]: client 203.88.23.9#34473: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:48:34 server named[2426]: client 203.88.23.9#62658: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:48:34 server named[2426]: client 203.88.23.9#51631: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:48:35 server named[2426]: client 203.88.23.9#54701: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:48:36 server named[2426]: client 203.88.6.10#63694: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:48:36 server named[2426]: client 203.88.6.10#18203: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:48:37 server named[2426]: client 203.88.6.10#9029: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:48:38 server named[2426]: client 203.88.6.10#58981: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:48:38 server named[2426]: client 203.88.6.10#29321: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:49:47 server named[2426]: client 119.160.127.42#42355: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:49:49 server named[2426]: client 119.160.120.42#46285: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:49:53 server named[2426]: client 119.160.120.42#30696: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:49:54 server named[2426]: client 119.160.127.42#14038: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:49:55 server named[2426]: client 119.160.120.42#33586: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied Jul 1 15:49:56 server named[2426]: client 119.160.127.42#55114: query (cache) 'xxxmaza.com/A/IN' denied

  Read the article

• Getting Optimal Performance from Oracle E-Business Suite

  - by Steven Chan (Oracle Development)

  Performance tuning and optimization in E-Business Suite environments can involve many different components and diagnostic tools.  Samer Barakat, Senior Architect in our Applications Performance group, held an OpenWorld 2013 session that covered: Performance triage, analysis and diagnostic tools Optimizing the E-Business Suite application tier, including Concurrent Manager Optimizing the E-Business Suite database tier Optimizing the E-Business Suite on Real Application Clusters (RAC) E-Business Suite on engineered systems, including Exadata and Exalogic Optimizing E-Business Suite data management, including archiving and purging  The Applications Performance group works with the world's largest E-Business Suite customers to isolate and resolve performance bottlenecks. This team has helped tune the E-Business Suite environments of world's largest companies to handle staggering amounts of transactional volume in multi-terabyte databases.  This group also publishes our official Oracle Apps benchmarks, white papers, and performance metrics. This is an essential set of tips and techniques that all EBS sysadmins and DBAs can use to improve the performance of their environments: Getting Optimal Performance from Oracle E-Business Suite (PDF, 1.7 MB) OpenWorld 2013 presentations are only available for approximately six months -- until ~March 2013.  Download this one while it's still available. Related Articles E-Business Suite Technology Sessions at OpenWorld 2013 OAUG/Collaborate Recap: Best Practices for E-Business Suite Performance Tuning

  Read the article

• Bad disk performance on HP DL360 with Smarty Array P400i RAID controller

  - by sarge

  I have a HP DL360 server with 4x 146GB SAS disks and a Smart Array P400i RAID controller with 256MB cache. The disks are in RAID 5 (3 disks + 1 hot spare). The server is running VMware ESX 3i. The disk write performance is really bad. Here are some numbers: ns1:~# hdparm -tT /dev/sda /dev/sda: Timing cached reads: 3364 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1685.69 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 18 MB in 3.79 seconds = 4.75 MB/sec ns1:~# time sh -c "dd if=/dev/zero of=ddfile bs=8k count=125000 && sync" 125000+0 records in 125000+0 records out 1024000000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 282.307 s, 3.6 MB/s real 4m52.003s user 0m2.160s sys 3m10.796s Compared to another server those number are terrible: Dell R200, 2x 500GB SATA disks, PERC raid controller (disks are mirrored). web4:~# hdparm -tT /dev/sda /dev/sda: Timing cached reads: 6584 MB in 2.00 seconds = 3297.79 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 316 MB in 3.02 seconds = 104.79 MB/sec web4:~# time sh -c "dd if=/dev/zero of=ddfile bs=8k count=125000 && sync" 125000+0 records in 125000+0 records out 1024000000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 35.2919 s, 29.0 MB/s real 0m36.570s user 0m0.476s sys 0m32.298s The server isn't very loaded and the VMware Infrastructure Client performance monitor is showing 550KBps average read and 1208KBps average write for the last 30 minutes (highest write rate: 6.6MBps). This has been a problem from the start. Any ideas?

  Read the article

• Performance variation

  - by Ree

  During my time spent working with multiple machines, I have noticed that performance of the same machine doing the same tasks in the same order differs and sometimes the difference is big enough to be noticeable. This applies to all the machines I've owned and/or maintained (old and modern). Some examples (many of them you may have noticed yourself) that sometimes are completed in different time frames: POST OS installation Hardware tests and operations (usually executed within a customized OS such as one of the many DOS variants), HDD tests and "low level" formats Software installation or other tasks (such as benchmarks) within a general purpose OS (Windows, Linux, etc) I can imagine this is caused by the fact that a machine is built with many components having to communicate as a whole and since the mechanical and electronic parts aren't perfect the overhead occurs. In the last example, I assume the OS complexity and concurrently running multiple processes has some additional effect as well. However, I'm wondering if this hardware imperfection and overhead is indeed that high to be humanly noticeable? Maybe there are other factors that are influencial as much or even more? So, in short - why? To emphasize: the difference is noticeable on the same machine performing the same tasks and this applies to ANY machine in my experience. I'm not comparing machine to machine performance.

  Read the article

• Improving Performance of RDP Over LAN

  - by Jared Brown

  Architecture: A deployment of 6 new HP thin clients (Windows XP Embedded) with TCP/IP access to several new HP servers (Windows 2003 Server). Each thin client is connected over fiber optic to a Gigabit Cisco switch, which the servers are connected to. There are 10/100 Ethernet to fiber converter boxes on each end of the fiber cables. Problem: Noticeable lag over RDP while using the Unigraphics CAD package. 3D models take .5 to 1 second to respond to mouse actions. Other Details: Network throughput on each thin client's RDP session is 7288 kbps. RDP connection settings - color setting: 15k, all themes, etc. turned off. Local and remote system performance stats are well within norms (CPU, Memory, and Network). Question: Are there newer versions of terminal services or RDP I can use on my existing OSes? Are there compression algorithms, etc. that are well suited for a high-bandwidth LAN? Are there valid alternatives that will yield higher performance (i.e. UltraVNC with drivers installed)? Are there TCP/IP tuning options I can exploit?

  Read the article

• Low CPU performance with low usage and clock - Windows 8.1

  - by Daniele

  I recently deleted everything from my PC and reinstalled Windows 8.1 from scratch. When I first booted into Windows everything was extremely slow though the CPU usage was very low (about 1%). After installing some drivers the problem seemed to be solved, I was able to use my PC normally. Today I installed a game and I noticed a strange behavior: the game was playable but the performance worsened more and more in the time. This is the situation BEFORE opening the game (normal): This is AFTER some minutes inside the game (low CPU usage and clock): Some information about my system: PC: Sony Vaio S13 (SVS13A1C5E) OS: Windows 8.1 CPU: Intel Core i7-3520M 2.90GHz GPU(1): Intel HD Graphics 4000 GPU(2): NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE I tried searching for new drivers and other solutions but noting worked and I don't know what is the cause. I did not checked the temperatures but the fans are not running fast and the PC does not look overheated. Update: Max CPU Temp: 66°C, Max GPU Temp: 61°C The strange thing is that the GPU load is 99% (GPU-Z) and the fan is almost silent. Update 2: I had troubles with Sony Vaio software, I can't get the FN keys and the STAMINA/SPEED switch to work (it is a physical switch to enable/disable the Nvidia card and change the Power Profile). I'm saying this because I remember that before reinstalling Windows there was an option in the Vaio Control Center (now it is not there anymore) that allowed me to choose from something like "priority to performance (ventilation)" or "priority to silence". The current behavior looks like a "priority to silence", but I can't get the stamina-speed switch to work and so I don't see similar oprions in the Vaio Control Center. I don't know if the problem is related to this.

  Read the article

• Linux Kernel Packet Forwarding Performance

  - by Bob Somers

  I've been using a Linux box as a router for some time now. Nothing too fancy, just enabling forwarding in the kernel, turning on masquerading, and setting up iptables to poke a few holes in the firewall. Recently a friend of mine pointed out a performance problem. Single TCP connections seem to experience very poor performance. You have to open multiple parallel TCP connections to get decent speed. For example, I have a 10 Mbit internet connection. When I download a file from a known-fast source using something like the DownThemAll! extension for Firefox (which opens multiple parallel TCP connections) I can get it to max out my downstream bandwidth at around 1 MB/s. However, when I download the same file using the built-in download manager in Firefox (uses only a single TCP connection) it starts fast and the speed tanks until it tops out around 100 KB/s to 350 KB/s. I've checked the internal network and it doesn't seem to have any problems. Everything goes through a 100 Mbit switch. I've also run iperf both internally (from the router to my desktop) and externally (from my desktop to a Linux box I own out on the net) and haven't seen any problems. It tops out around 1 MB/s like it should. Speedtest.net also reports 10 Mbits speeds. The load on the Linux machine is around 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 all the time, and it's got plenty of free RAM. It's an older laptop with a Pentium M 1.6 GHz processor and 1 GB of RAM. The internal network is connected to the built in Intel NIC and the cable modem is connected to a Netgear FA511 32-bit PCMCIA network card. I think the problem is with the packet forwarding in the router, but I honestly am not sure where the problem could be. Is there anything that would substantially slow down a single TCP stream?

  Read the article

• PHP/MySQL Performance Testing with Just PHP

  - by Mike Gifford

  I'm trying to diagnose a server where the website is loading very slowly, but unfortunately my client has only provided me with FTP access. I've got FTP access so I can upload PHP scripts, but can't set up any other server side tools. I have access to phpMyAdmin, but not direct access to the MySQL server. It is also unfortunately a Windows server (and we've been a Linux shop for over a decade now). So, if I wan to evaluate MySQL & disk speed performance through PHP on a generic server, what is the best way to do this? There are already tools like: https://github.com/raphaelm/php-benchmark or https://github.com/InfinitySoft/php-benchmark But I'm surprised there isn't something that someone has already set up & configured to just run through and do some basic testing of a server's responsiveness. Every time we evaluate a new server environment it's handy to be able to compare it to an existing one quickly to see if there are any anomalies. I guess I'd just hoped that someone else had written up a script to do this already. I know I have, but that was before Github when there was a handy place to post scraps of code like this. Originally posted in http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12321498/php-mysql-performance-testing-with-just-php but it was recommended that I re-post it here.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21  | Next Page >