Search Results

Search found 24862 results on 995 pages for 'site verification'.

Page 14/995 | < Previous Page | 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21  | Next Page >

  • Which is the best Question and Answers site ?

    - by Geek
    Hi, Which site do you think is the best site for Question/Answers for a developer incase of technical questions. Good old stackoverflow seems to be losing it's charm, if you go through it you will find loads and loads of questions with very few answers. Infact most questions dont even have enough reads on them. Has any new site come up which has gained recent popularity for technical questions ? thanks.

    Read the article

  • Working out costs to implement WCAG 2.0 (AA) site

    - by Sixfoot Studio
    Hi, I've run our client's site through a WCAG 2.0 validator which has returned 415 tasks that need to be worked through in order to get it WCAG 2.0 compliant. For the most part, I can get a rough estimation of how long a task will take but there are tasks I have never had to do before which I am not sure how to cost. I would like to know if someone has a rough guide on what to cost a client to convert their site to a compliant WCAG 2.0 (AA) site. Many thanks

    Read the article

  • Redisigning an old site, structure change etc

    - by RhymeGuy
    I have an old site built in 2006, it has around 200 pages and 500 pictures. Every single page is of course indexed as well as images. It is very well ranked for targeted keywords and I receive good amount of SEO traffic (I guess that's due the various campaigns, branding, ppc, etc..) Problem: Site has outdated design, pages and images have not so proper names, there are no heading and alt tags, it was built in tables, inline CSS etc.. Goal: Complete redisign site, use divs, change file names, add proper meta data, alt tags etc.. Question: How this can affect current SEO positions? I will redirect (301) every single page to the new one, build site map, but what to do with images? Do I need to redirect them also? Any other suggestion?

    Read the article

  • edited and reversed changes on .htaccess - site starts redirecting to .comindex.php/

    - by Aurigae
    Site is a Joomla 2.5 site. I wanted to add a non www to www redirect to the htaccess file, did so, then the redirection went mad, reversed but still the site redirects. When i click view site in admin panel, i get linked to http://domain.comindex.php/ The website is http://www.domain.com Visiting the website URL works without www, but once you click on projects it acts mad too. Projects is managed with joomshopping extension. EDIT: the redirect also happens when rewrite is deactivated in admin panel. ## # @package Joomla # @copyright Copyright (C) 2005 - 2012 Open Source Matters. All rights reserved. # @license GNU General Public License version 2 or later; see LICENSE.txt ## ## # READ THIS COMPLETELY IF YOU CHOOSE TO USE THIS FILE! # # The line just below this section: 'Options +FollowSymLinks' may cause problems # with some server configurations. It is required for use of mod_rewrite, but may already # be set by your server administrator in a way that dissallows changing it in # your .htaccess file. If using it causes your server to error out, comment it out (add # to # beginning of line), reload your site in your browser and test your sef url's. If they work, # it has been set by your server administrator and you do not need it set here. ## ## Can be commented out if causes errors, see notes above. Options +FollowSymLinks ## Mod_rewrite in use. RewriteEngine On ## Begin - Rewrite rules to block out some common exploits. # If you experience problems on your site block out the operations listed below # This attempts to block the most common type of exploit `attempts` to Joomla! # # Block out any script trying to base64_encode data within the URL. RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} base64_encode[^(]*\([^)]*\) [OR] # Block out any script that includes a <script> tag in URL. RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} (<|%3C)([^s]*s)+cript.*(>|%3E) [NC,OR] # Block out any script trying to set a PHP GLOBALS variable via URL. RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} GLOBALS(=|\[|\%[0-9A-Z]{0,2}) [OR] # Block out any script trying to modify a _REQUEST variable via URL. RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} _REQUEST(=|\[|\%[0-9A-Z]{0,2}) # Return 403 Forbidden header and show the content of the root homepage RewriteRule .* index.php [F] # ## End - Rewrite rules to block out some common exploits. ## Begin - Custom redirects # # If you need to redirect some pages, or set a canonical non-www to # www redirect (or vice versa), place that code here. Ensure those # redirects use the correct RewriteRule syntax and the [R=301,L] flags. # ## End - Custom redirects ## # Uncomment following line if your webserver's URL # is not directly related to physical file paths. # Update Your Joomla! Directory (just / for root). ## # RewriteBase / ## Begin - Joomla! core SEF Section. # RewriteRule .* - [E=HTTP_AUTHORIZATION:%{HTTP:Authorization}] # # If the requested path and file is not /index.php and the request # has not already been internally rewritten to the index.php script RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !^/index\.php # and the request is for something within the component folder, # or for the site root, or for an extensionless URL, or the # requested URL ends with one of the listed extensions RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} /component/|(/[^.]*|\.(php|html?|feed|pdf|vcf|raw))$ [NC] # and the requested path and file doesn't directly match a physical file RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f # and the requested path and file doesn't directly match a physical folder RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d # internally rewrite the request to the index.php script RewriteRule .* index.php [L] # ## End - Joomla! core SEF Section. Redirect 301 /index.html /index.php Redirect 301 /services /project Redirect 301 /projects/projects.html /project Redirect 301 /projects/project1.html /project Redirect 301 /projects/project2.html /project Redirect 301 /projects /project Redirect 301 /keypersonnel.html /about-agrin/keystaff Redirect 301 /cooperation.htm /about-agrin/intcoop Redirect 301 /member.html /about-agrin/memberships Redirect 301 /contact.html /contacts Redirect 301 /hr.htm /jobs Redirect 301 /index.php/404 /index.php

    Read the article

  • Le SEO en 10 minutes, Google donne ses recettes pour optimiser le référencement d'un site Web

    Le SEO en 10 minutes Google donne ses recettes pour optimiser le référencement d'un site Web Google vient de publier une vidéo de 10 minutes qui explique les bases du SEO (search engine optimization) pour les startups. L'optimisation d'un site Web pour les moteurs de recherche tout en respectant les recommandations de Google peut être un véritable défi pour les entreprises. Maile Ohye, Google Developer Advocate, donne en 10 minutes, les recettes pour optimiser un petit site de moins de 100 pages dans la vidéo « SEO for startups in under 10 minutes ». Les concepts clés de l'optimisation du référencement de son site y sont évoqués comme la redirection, la str...

    Read the article

  • Script + template to generate static web site?

    - by user702
    After giving it more thought, I don't actually need a PHP-based CMS for a small, static web site. Does someone know of a good solution that can run on Windows that would take basic HTML pages and JPG pictures, combine those with a template, and generate a static site ready to be FTPed to an web server? Thank you. Edit: For those looking for the same information, here's some well-known tools to create a static site: http://get-simple.info/ http://gpeasy.com/How_Easy http://textpattern.com/features http://nanoc.stoneship.org/ http://www.movabletype.com/

    Read the article

  • 5 Reasons to Use An Instant Site Creator to Build Your Websites

    An Instant Site Creator is a piece of software that will allow you to create an unlimited number of websites with just a few mouse clicks. You can put up a new, professional looking site in minutes instead of hours or days, saving you both time and money. Here are five reasons you might want to use an instant site creator, or website builder software, instead of outsourcing the project or spending long hours doing it yourself

    Read the article

  • Links in my site have been hacked

    - by Funky
    In my site I prefix the images and links with the domain of the site for better SEO using the code below: public static string GetHTTPHost() { string host = ""; if (HttpContext.Current.Request["HTTP_HOST"] != null) host = HttpContext.Current.Request["HTTP_HOST"]; if (host == "site.co.uk" || host == "site.com") { return "http://www." + host; } return "http://"+ host; } This works great, but for some reason, lots of links have now changed to http://www.baidu.com/... There is no sign of this in any of the code or project, the files on the server also have a change date when i last did the publish at 11 yesterday, so all the files on there look fine. I am using ASP.net and Umbraco 4.7.2 Does anyone have any ideas? thanks

    Read the article

  • 5 Easy Ways to Get High PR Links to Boost Your Site in Google

    High PR links are some of the most valuable aspects in any link-building & SEO campaign. Not only do these links make Google respect your site more, but they can also boost your site's ranking overnight. Here are 5 places to get high quality links that will do a lot of good to your site's ranking in Google.

    Read the article

  • Nice Web Site, Now What?

    So you got someone or several people to your web site maybe through organic search or from a referring site, you might have just met someone and they went to your site to check out your company. Great job. Now what?

    Read the article

  • Website migration from WordPress to a static site and doing 301 redirects without access to existing site?

    - by user3114468
    Currently working on a project that is a hosted on WordPress that is being migrated to a static site. However I presently do not have access to the existing site as it's managed by another developer. The concern is not the lack of having access to content as the site owner has generated very little content (reason for migration) and we were able to do this manually. Rather the concern is to do 301 redirects. The site will not change domains but URLs such as from example.com/?page_id=3 to example.com/services. To add, the site is migrating to new server using same domain name. I thought maybe this could be done via editing permalinks prior to migration and WordPress would update automatically if configured to write on server. But if not configured (as this is not always the case) I do not have htaccess to fix it in case there are suddenly a bunch of 404 errors for every page. Really could use some help on the best procedure to follow in this case. This is the first migration project I've worked on.

    Read the article

  • Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in OpenStack Horizon

    - by Ritwik Ghoshal
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2014-3473 cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability 4.3 OpenStack Horizon Solaris 11.2 11.2.1.5.0 CVE-2014-3474 cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability 4.3 CVE-2014-3475 cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability 4.3 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Oracle's product distributions.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • Learn How to Start a Membership Site

    Each and every individual is curious to find out how to start a membership site. A membership site is a site where a visitor has to pay to view the contents, and unauthorized viewers are prohibited from surfing such sites.

    Read the article

  • Is asking for control totals on a file an outdated means of verifying a file?

    - by CTKeane
    I'm in a new position where I need to process a flat files on a regular basis. The last time I did this was 5 or 6 years ago but as part of the file layout I received control totals. It gave me simplistic information on the file like the total number of records as well as sums of the important fields. This helped me during testing then also during production to verify the file arrived and has correct information. I have asked for similar data for this new project and have hit a wall of no. Is this no longer a standard practice? Is there a better way?

    Read the article

  • Create a new site programmatically and select parent site? (SharePoint)

    - by peter
    Hi, I am using the following code to create a new site: newWeb = SPContext.GetContext(HttpContext.Current).Web.Webs.Add(newSiteUrl, newSiteName, null, (uint)1033, siteTemplate, true, false); try { newWeb.Update(); } NewSiteUrl and newSiteName are values from two textboxes and on whichever site I use this code (in a web part) the new site will be a subsite to this site. I would now like to be able to select a parent site so that the new site can sit anywhere in the site collection, not just as a subsite to the site where I use the web part. I created the following function to get all the sites in the site collection and populate a drop down with the name and url for every site private void getSites() { SPSite oSiteCollection = SPContext.Current.Site; SPWebCollection collWebsite = oSiteCollection.AllWebs; for (int i = 0; i < collWebsite.Count; i++) { ddlParentSite.Items.Add(new ListItem(collWebsite[i].Title, collWebsite[i].Url)); } oSiteCollection.Dispose(); } If the user selects a site in the dropdown, is it possible to use that URL in newSiteUrl so decide where the new site should be? I don't get it to work really and the new site still becomes a subsite to the current one. I guess it has to do with HttpContext.Current? Any ideas on how I should do it instead? It's the first time I write custom web parts and the sharepoint object model is a bit overwhelming at the moment. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • apache Client Certificate Authentication errors: Certificate Verification: Error (18): self signed certificate

    - by decoy
    So I have been following instructions on setting up Client Certificate Authentication in Apache2 w/ mod_ssl. This is solely for the purpose of testing an application against CAA, not for any sort of production use. So far I've followed http://www.impetus.us/~rjmooney/projects/misc/clientcertauth.html for advice on generating my CA, server, and client encryption information. I've put all three of them into /etc/ssl/ca/private. I've setup the following additional directives in my default_ssl site file: <IfModule mod_ssl.c> <VirtualHost _default_:443> ... SSLEngine on SSLCertificateFile /etc/ssl/ca/private/server.crt SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/ssl/ca/private/server.key SSLVerifyClient require SSLVerifyDepth 2 SSLCACertificatePath /etc/ssl/ca/private SSLCACertificateFile /etc/ssl/ca/private/ca.crt <Location /> SSLRequireSSL SSLVerifyClient require SSLVerifyDepth 2 </Location> <FilesMatch "\.(cgi|shtml|phtml|php)$"> SSLOptions +StdEnvVars </FilesMatch> <Directory /usr/lib/cgi-bin> SSLOptions +StdEnvVars </Directory> ... </VirtualHost> </IfModule> I've install the p12 file into Chrome, but when I go to visit https://localhost, I get the following errors Chrome: Error 107 (net::ERR_SSL_PROTOCOL_ERROR): SSL protocol error. Apache: Certificate Verification: Error (18): self signed certificate If I had to guess, one of my directives is not setup right to load and verify the p12 w/ my self created CA. But I can't for the life of me figure out what it is. Would anyone have more experience here who could point me in the right direction?

    Read the article

  • Exchange backup verification shows no files

    - by Olaf
    [SBS2003SP2] If i read the exhange log it shows the backup contains no files just folders and the total size seems to be Ok. I i try to restore the folders are empty... But the 14 files that where backupped dissapeared in the verification log?! Other backups on the same medium turned out to be fine. Any idea what's wrong here? This is my log: Backup Status Operation: Backup Active backup destination: File Media name: "testbackup.bkf created 2-6-2010 at 11:25" Volume shadow copy creation: Attempt 1. Backup of "SERVER1\Microsoft Information Store\First Storage Group" Backup set #1 on media #1 Backup description: "Set created 2-6-2010 at 11:25" Media name: "testbackup.bkf created 2-6-2010 at 11:25" Backup Type: Normal Backup started on 2-6-2010 at 11:26. Backup completed on 2-6-2010 at 12:21. Directories: 4 Files: 14 Bytes: 26.842.932.104 Time: 55 minutes and 38 seconds Verify Status Operation: Verify After Backup Active backup destination: File Active backup destination: \backup\Server1\Backup Files\testbackup.bkf Verify of "SERVER1\Microsoft Information Store\First Storage Group" Backup set #1 on media #1 Backup description: "Set created 2-6-2010 at 11:25" Verify started on 2-6-2010 at 12:21. Verify completed on 2-6-2010 at 12:47. Directories: 4 Files: 0 Different: 0 Bytes: 26.842.932.104 Time: 25 minutes and 46 seconds

    Read the article

  • Verification of downloaded package with rpm

    - by moooeeeep
    I wanted to install a package on CentOS 6 via rpm (e.g., the current epel-release). EDIT: Of course I would always prefer the installation via yum but somehow I failed to get that specific package installed using this normal approach. As such, the EPEL/FAQ recommends Version 2. As I'm downloading the package through an insecure channel (http) I wanted to make sure that the integrity of the file is verified using information that is not provided with the downloaded file itself. Is this especially true for all of these approaches? I've seen various approaches to this on the internet: Version 1 rpm -ivh http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/epel-release-6-7.noarch.rpm Version 2 rpm -Uvh http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/epel-release-6-7.noarch.rpm Version 3 wget http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/x86_64/epel-release-6-7.noarch.rpm rpm --import https://fedoraproject.org/static/0608B895.txt rpm -K epel-release-6-7.noarch.rpm rpm -i epel-release-6-7.noarch.rpm I do not know rpm very well, so I wondered how they might differ? My guess (after reading the manpage) is that the first should only be used when the package is previously not installed, the second would additionally remove previous versions of the package after installation, the first two omit some verification steps before the actual installation that are done by rpm -K. So my main questions at this point are Are my guesses correct or am I missing something? Is the rpm --import ... implicitly done for the first two approaches as well, and if not, isn't it necessary to do so after all? Are these additional checks performed by rpm -K ... any relevant? What is the best (most secure, most reliable, most maintainable, ...) way of installing packages via rpm in general?

    Read the article

  • PHP XPath - how to get value from result

    - by LeeTee
    I have the followng XML file from Ebay <GeteBayDetailsResponse xmlns="urn:ebay:apis:eBLBaseComponents"><Timestamp>2012-07-04T12:02:14.541Z</Timestamp><Ack>Success</Ack><Version>779</Version><Build>E779_INTL_BUNDLED_14986004_R1</Build><SiteDetails><Site>US</Site><SiteID>0</SiteID><DetailVersion>1</DetailVersion><UpdateTime>2009-07-09T10:48:17.000Z</UpdateTime></SiteDetails><SiteDetails><Site>Canada</Site><SiteID>2</SiteID><DetailVersion>1</DetailVersion><UpdateTime>2009-07-09T10:48:17.000Z</UpdateTime></SiteDetails><SiteDetails><Site>UK</Site><SiteID>3</SiteID><DetailVersion>1</DetailVersion><UpdateTime>2009-07-09T10:48:17.000Z</UpdateTime></SiteDetails><SiteDetails><Site>Germany</Site><SiteID>77</SiteID><DetailVersion>1</DetailVersion><UpdateTime>2009-07-09T10:48:17.000Z</UpdateTime></SiteDetails><SiteDetails><Site>Australia</Site><SiteID>15</SiteID><DetailVersion>1</DetailVersion><UpdateTime>2009-07-09T10:48:17.000Z</UpdateTime></SiteDetails><SiteDetails><Site>France</Site><SiteID>71</SiteID><DetailVersion>1</DetailVersion><UpdateTime>2009-07-09T10:48:17.000Z</UpdateTime></SiteDetails><SiteDetails><Site>eBayMotors</Site><SiteID>100</SiteID><DetailVersion>1</DetailVersion><UpdateTime>2009-07-09T10:48:17.000Z</UpdateTime></SiteDetails><SiteDetails><Site>Italy</Site><SiteID>101</SiteID><DetailVersion>1</DetailVersion><UpdateTime>2009-07-09T10:48:17.000Z</UpdateTime></SiteDetails><SiteDetails><Site>Netherlands</Site><SiteID>146</SiteID><DetailVersion>1</DetailVersion><UpdateTime>2009-07-09T10:48:17.000Z</UpdateTime></SiteDetails><SiteDetails><Site>Spain</Site><SiteID>186</SiteID><DetailVersion>1</DetailVersion><UpdateTime>2009-07-09T10:48:17.000Z</UpdateTime></SiteDetails><SiteDetails><Site>India</Site><SiteID>203</SiteID><DetailVersion>1</DetailVersion><UpdateTime>2009-07-09T10:48:17.000Z</UpdateTime></SiteDetails><SiteDetails><Site>HongKong</Site><SiteID>201</SiteID><DetailVersion>1</DetailVersion><UpdateTime>2009-07-09T10:48:17.000Z</UpdateTime></SiteDetails><SiteDetails><Site>Singapore</Site><SiteID>216</SiteID><DetailVersion>1</DetailVersion><UpdateTime>2009-07-09T10:48:17.000Z</UpdateTime></SiteDetails><SiteDetails><Site>Malaysia</Site><SiteID>207</SiteID><DetailVersion>1</DetailVersion><UpdateTime>2009-07-09T10:48:17.000Z</UpdateTime></SiteDetails><SiteDetails><Site>Philippines</Site><SiteID>211</SiteID><DetailVersion>1</DetailVersion><UpdateTime>2009-07-09T10:48:17.000Z</UpdateTime></SiteDetails><SiteDetails><Site>CanadaFrench</Site><SiteID>210</SiteID><DetailVersion>1</DetailVersion><UpdateTime>2009-07-09T10:48:17.000Z</UpdateTime></SiteDetails><SiteDetails><Site>Poland</Site><SiteID>212</SiteID><DetailVersion>1</DetailVersion><UpdateTime>2009-07-09T10:48:17.000Z</UpdateTime></SiteDetails><SiteDetails><Site>Belgium_Dutch</Site><SiteID>123</SiteID><DetailVersion>1</DetailVersion><UpdateTime>2009-07-09T10:48:17.000Z</UpdateTime></SiteDetails><SiteDetails><Site>Belgium_French</Site><SiteID>23</SiteID><DetailVersion>1</DetailVersion><UpdateTime>2009-07-09T10:48:17.000Z</UpdateTime></SiteDetails><SiteDetails><Site>Austria</Site><SiteID>16</SiteID><DetailVersion>1</DetailVersion><UpdateTime>2009-07-09T10:48:17.000Z</UpdateTime></SiteDetails><SiteDetails><Site>Switzerland</Site><SiteID>193</SiteID><DetailVersion>1</DetailVersion><UpdateTime>2009-07-09T10:48:17.000Z</UpdateTime></SiteDetails><SiteDetails><Site>Ireland</Site><SiteID>205</SiteID><DetailVersion>1</DetailVersion><UpdateTime>2009-07-09T10:48:17.000Z</UpdateTime></SiteDetails><UpdateTime>2009-07-09T10:48:17.000Z</UpdateTime></GeteBayDetailsResponse> I need to get the value of node SiteID where the node Site matches whatever variable I pass. The code I have is: $xml_file ='SiteDetails.xml'; $xmlDoc = new DomDocument(); $xmlDoc->load($xml_file); $xpath = new DOMXpath($xmlDoc); $siteIDList = $xpath->query("/GeteBayDetailsResponse/SiteDetails[Site=$site]/SiteID"); var_dump($siteIDList); echo $siteIDList->SiteID; I get the following result: object(DOMNodeList)#11 (0) { } Can anyone help? I want to get a value of 3.

    Read the article

  • 10 steps to enable &lsquo;Anonymous Access&rsquo; for your SharePoint 2010 site

    - by KunaalKapoor
    What’s Anonymous Access? Anonymous access to your SharePoint site enables all visitors to view your SharePoint site anonymously without having to log in. With this blog I’d like to go through an easy step wise procedure to enable/set up anonymous access. Before you actually enable anonymous access on the site, you’ll have to change some settings at the web app level. So let’s start with that: Prerequisite(s): 1. A hosted SharePoint 2010 farm/server. 2. An existing SharePoint site. I just thought I’d mention the above pre-reqs, since the steps mentioned below would’nt be valid or a different type of a site. Step 1: In Central Administration, under Application Management, click on the Manage web applications. Step 2: Now select the site you want to enable anonymous access and click on the Authentication Providers icon. Step 3: On the modal window click on the Default zone. Step 4: Now under the Edit Authentication section, check Enable anonymous access and click Save. This is basically to make the Anonymous Access authentication mechanism available at the web app level @ IIS. Now, web application will allow anonymous access to be set. 5. Going back to Web Application Management click on the Anonymous Policy icon. Step 6: Also before we proceed any further, under the Anonymous Access Restrictions (@ web app mgmt.) select your Zone and set the Permissions to None – No policy and click Save. Step 7:  Now lets navigate to your top level site collection for the web application. Click the Site Actions > Site Settings. Under Users and Permissions click Site permissions. Step 8: Under Users and Permissions, click on Site Permissions. Step 9: Under the Edit tab, click on Anonymous Access. Step 10: Choose whether you want Anonymous users to have access to the entire Web site or to lists and libraries only, and then click on OK. You should now be able to see the view as below under your permissions Also keep in mind: If you are trying to access the site from a browser within the domain, then you’ll need to change some browser settings to see the after affects. Normally this is because the browsers (Internet Explorer) is set to log in automatically to intranet zone only , not sure if you have explicitly changed the zones and added it to trusted sites. If this is from a box within your domain please try to access the site by temporarily changing the Internet Explorer setting to Anonymous Logon on the zone that the site is added example "Intranet" and try . You will find the same settings by clicking on Tools > Internet Options > Security Tab.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21  | Next Page >