Search Results

Search found 56661 results on 2267 pages for 'class library'.

Page 140/2267 | < Previous Page | 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147  | Next Page >

  • C++ allocate objects on heap of base class with protected constructors via inheritance

    - by KRao
    I have a class with protected constructor: class B { protected: B(){}; }; Now I derive from it and define two static functions and I manage to actually create objects of the class B, but not on the heap: class A : public B { public: static B createOnStack() {return B();} //static B* createOnHeap() {return new B;} //Compile time Error on VS2010 }; B b = A::createOnStack(); //This works on VS2010! The question is: 1) Is VS2010 wrong in allowing the first case? 2) Is it possible to create objects of B without modifying B in any way (no friendship and no extra functions). I am asking, because it is possible to make something similar when dealing with instances of B and its member functions, see: http://accu.org/index.php/journals/296 Thank you in advance for any suggestion! Kind regards

    Read the article

  • Code casing question for private class fields

    - by user200295
    Take the following example public class Class1{ public string Prop1{ get {return m_Prop1;} set {m_Prop1 = value; } } private string m_Prop1; // this is standard private property variable name // how do we cap this variable name? While the compiler can figure out same casing // it makes it hard to read private Class2 Class2; // we camel case the parameter public Class1(Class2 class2){ this.Class2 = class2; } } Here are my stock rules The class name is capitalized (Class1) The public properties are capitalized (Prop1) The private field tied to a public property has m_ to indicate this. My coworker prefers _ There is some debate if using m_ or _ should be used at all, as it is like Hungarian notation. Private class fields are capitalized. The part I am trying to figure out is what do I do if when the Class name of a private field matches the private field name. For example, private Class2 Class2; This is confusing. If the private field name is not the same class, for example private string Name; , there isn't much issue. Or am I thinking about the issue wrong. Should my classes and private fields be named in such a way that they don't collide?

    Read the article

  • calling java class file through windows service in .net

    - by Kaumadee Wijewantha
    i have creared windows service from C# for calling java class file. i have used bat file to call this java file in C#. the task of the java class is create output file. but the when stated the service output file wasnt created. java class is worked perfeclty with out servise when it invoke from bat file. (but may task manger shows instantiates of command prompt.) is it possible to call java class through bat file in windws servise?

    Read the article

  • ANDROID: inside Service class, executing a method for Toast (or Status Bar notification) from schedu

    - by Peter SHINe ???
    I am trying to execute a {public void} method in Service, from scheduled TimerTask which is periodically executing. This TimerTask periodically checks a condition. If it's true, it calls method via {className}.{methodName}; However, as Java requires, the method needs to be {pubic static} method, if I want to use {className} with {.dot} The problem is this method is for notification using Toast(Android pop-up notification) and Status Bar To use these notifications, one must use Context context = getApplicationContext(); But for this to work, the method must not have {static} modifier and resides in Service class. So, basically, I want background Service to evaluate condition from scheduled TimerTask, and execute a method in Service class. Can anyone help me what's the right way to use Service, invoking a method when certain condition is satisfied while looping evaluation? Here are the actually lines of codes: The TimerTask class (WatchClipboard.java) : public class WatchClipboard extends TimerTask { //DECLARATION private static GetDefinition getDefinition = new GetDefinition(); @Override public void run() { if (WordUp.clipboard.hasText()) { WordUp.newCopied = WordUp.clipboard.getText().toString().trim().toLowerCase(); if (!(WordUp.currentCopied.equals(WordUp.newCopied))) { WordUp.currentCopied = WordUp.newCopied; Log.v(WordUp.TAG, WordUp.currentCopied); getDefinition.apiCall_Wordnik(); FetchService.instantNotification(); //it requires this method to have {static} modifier, if I want call in this way. } } } } And the Service class (FetchService.java) : If I change the modifier to static, {Context} related problems occur public class FetchService extends Service { public static final String TAG = "WordUp"; //for Logcat filtering //DECLARATION private static Timer runningTimer; private static final boolean THIS_IS_DAEMON = true; private static WatchClipboard watchClipboard; private static final long DELAY = 0; private static final long PERIOD = 100; @Override public IBinder onBind(Intent arg0) { // TODO Auto-generated method stub return null; } @Override public void onCreate() { Log.v(WordUp.TAG, "FetchService.onCreate()"); super.onCreate(); //TESTING SERVICE RUNNING watchClipboard = new WatchClipboard(); runningTimer = new Timer("runningTimer", THIS_IS_DAEMON); runningTimer.schedule(watchClipboard, DELAY, PERIOD); } @Override public void onDestroy() { super.onDestroy(); runningTimer.cancel(); stopSelf(); Log.v(WordUp.TAG, "FetchService.onCreate().stopSelf()"); } public void instantNotification() { //If I change the modifier to static, {Context} related problems occur Context context = getApplicationContext(); // application Context //use Toast notification: Need to accept user interaction, and change the duration of show Toast toast = Toast.makeText(context, WordUp.newCopied+": "+WordUp.newDefinition, Toast.LENGTH_LONG); toast.show(); //use Status notification: need to automatically expand to show lines of definitions NotificationManager mNotificationManager = (NotificationManager) getSystemService(Context.NOTIFICATION_SERVICE); int icon = R.drawable.icon; // icon from resources CharSequence tickerText = WordUp.newCopied; // ticker-text long when = System.currentTimeMillis(); // notification time CharSequence contentTitle = WordUp.newCopied; //expanded message title CharSequence contentText = WordUp.newDefinition; //expanded message text Intent notificationIntent = new Intent(this, WordUp.class); PendingIntent contentIntent = PendingIntent.getActivity(this, 0, notificationIntent, 0); // the next two lines initialize the Notification, using the configurations above Notification notification = new Notification(icon, tickerText, when); notification.setLatestEventInfo(context, contentTitle, contentText, contentIntent); mNotificationManager.notify(WordUp.WORDUP_STATUS, notification); } }

    Read the article

  • Inlining an array of non-default constructible objects in a C++ class

    - by porgarmingduod
    C++ doesn't allow a class containing an array of items that are not default constructible: class Gordian { public: int member; Gordian(int must_have_variable) : member(must_have_variable) {} }; class Knot { Gordian* pointer_array[8]; // Sure, this works. Gordian inlined_array[8]; // Won't compile. Can't be initialized. }; As even beginner C++ users know, the language guarantees that all members are initialized when constructing a class. And it doesn't trust the user to initialize everything in the constructor - one has to provide valid arguments to the constructors of all members before the body of the constructor even starts. Generally, that's a great idea as far as I'm concerned, but I've come across a situation where it would be a lot easier if I could actually have an array of non-default constructible objects. The obvious solution: Have an array of pointers to the objects. This is not optimal in my case, as I am using shared memory. It would force me to do extra allocation from an already contended resource (that is, the shared memory). The entire reason I want to have the array inlined in the object is to reduce the number of allocations. This is a situation where I would be willing to use a hack, even an ugly one, provided it works. One possible hack I am thinking about would be: class Knot { public: struct dummy { char padding[sizeof(Gordian)]; }; dummy inlined_array[8]; Gordian* get(int index) { return reinterpret_cast<Gordian*>(&inlined_array[index]); } Knot() { for (int x = 0; x != 8; x++) { new (get(x)) Gordian(x*x); } } }; Sure, it compiles, but I'm not exactly an experienced C++ programmer. That is, I couldn't possibly trust my hacks less. So, the questions: 1) Does the hack I came up with seem workable? What are the issues? (I'm mainly concerned with C++0x on newer versions of GCC). 2) Is there a better way to inline an array of non-default constructible objects in a class?

    Read the article

  • Setting new class variables inside a module

    - by Sean McCleary
    I have a plugin I have been working on that adds publishing to ActiveRecord classes. I extend my classes with my publisher like so: class Note < ActiveRecord::Base # ... publishable :related_attributes => [:taggings] end My publisher is structured like: module Publisher def self.included(base) base.send(:extend, ClassMethods) @@publishing_options = [] # does not seem to be available end module ClassMethods def publishable options={} include InstanceMethods @@publishing_options = options # does not work as class_variable_set is a private method # self.class_variable_set(:@@publishing_options, options) # results in: uninitialized class variable @@publishing_options in Publisher::ClassMethods puts "@@publishing_options: #{@@publishing_options.inspect}" # ... end # ... end module InstanceMethods # results in: uninitialized class variable @@publishing_options in Publisher::InstanceMethods def related_attributes @@publishing_options[:related_attributes] end # ... end end Any ideas on how to pass options to publishable and have them available as a class variable?

    Read the article

  • C#: Basic Reflection Class

    - by Mike
    I'm trying to find a basic reflection abstract class that will generate basic information about a class. I have a template of how I would like it to work: class ThreeList<string,Type,T> { string Name {get; set;} Type Type {get; set;} T Value {get; set;} } abstract class Reflect<T> { List<ThreeList<string, Type, T> list; ReturnType MethodName() { foreach (System.Reflection.PropertyInfo prop in this.GetType().GetProperties()) { object value = prop.GetValue(this, new object[] { }); list.Add(prop.Name, prop.DeclaringType, value); } } } I'd like it to be infinitely deep, recursively calling Reflect. Something like this has to exist. I'm not really opposed to coding it myself, I just don't want to go through the hassle if its already been done.

    Read the article

  • Mocking a namespace in a partial class.

    - by Nix
    I am messing around with Entity Framework 3.5 SP1 and I am trying to find a cleaner way to do the below. Basically I have an EF model and I am adding some Eager Loaded entities and i want to put them in the partial class context Eager namespace. Currently I am using composition but I feel like there is an easier way to do what I want. namespace Entities{ public partial class TestObjectContext { EagerExtensions Eager { get;set;} public TestObjectContext(){ Eager = new EagerExtensions (this); } } public partial class EagerExtensions { TestObjectContext context; public EagerExtensions(TestObjectContext _context){ context = _context; } public IQueryable<TestEntity> TestEntity { get { return context.TestEntity .Include("TestEntityType") .Include("Test.Attached.AttachedType") .AsQueryable(); } } } } public class Tester{ public void ShowHowIWantIt(){ TestObjectContext context= new TestObjectContext(); var query = from a in context.Eager.TestEntity select a; } }

    Read the article

  • Member variable in C++ class that is always constant for all objects of that class?

    - by user1799323
    I'm constructing a class where I have three member variables that I want to always be the same value NO MATTER WHAT. I have class foo{ public: double var_1, var_2, var_3; double x=1, y=2, z=3; [functions go here] }; that gave me an error since I can't initialize a variable like that. But I want x, y and z to always be 1, 2 and 3 respectively. I tried defining them outside the class but that doesn't work since I want them to be member variables of the class. How do I do this?

    Read the article

  • PHP: How do I access child properties from a method in a base object?

    - by Nick
    I'd like for all of my objects to be able to return a JSON string of themselves. So I created a base class for all of my objects to extend, with an AsJSON() method: class BaseObject { public function AsJSON() { $JSON=array(); foreach ($this as $key = $value) { if(is_null($value)) continue; $JSON[$key] = $value; } return json_encode($JSON); } } And then extend my child classes from that: class Package extends BaseObject { ... } So in my code, I expect to do this: $Box = new Package; $Box-SetID('123'); $Box-SetName('12x8x6'); $Box-SetBoxX('12'); $Box-SetBoxY('8'); $Box-SetBoxZ('6'); echo $Box-AsJSON(); But the JSON string it returns only contains the BaseClass's properties, not the child properties. How do I modify my AsJSON() function so that $this refers to the child's properties, not the parent's?

    Read the article

  • Reference variable to an object instantiated/initialized in another class in Java

    - by Alex
    The reason I'm asking is because I'm getting NullPointerException. I now this is very easy but I'm pretty new programming and find this a bit confusing. So say I have initialized an object in a class and want to access that same object from another class. Like now for instance I'm working on a small Chess game, in my model Game class I have an instance of Board, an object. Board, in turn, has an array of Squares. Square[][]. Game has board, board has Square[][]. Now if I want to access the Square[][] through the object board (in Game) of type Board. Do I just declare a variable with the same name and type or do I have to initialize it again? Board board OR Board board = new Board(); Note, I have already initialized board in the class Game so if I do it again, won't they be two totally different Board objects?

    Read the article

  • How to access the next element and check if it has a particular class

    - by NaN
    I need to call a function based on whether the second following td element has a certain class. Here is the HTML <tr id="939"> <td data-id="939">Test2</td> <td class="hold" data-id="939"></td> </tr> <tr id="938"> <td data-id="938">Test1</td> <td class="someotherclass" data-id="938"></td> </tr> Here is the JQuery function $('body').on('click', '#article td:first-child', function(e){ // I need to check the next td for the hold class if($(this).next().hasClass(".hold")){ // Call my function } }); How do I do this? I've tried using next and closest but that yields nothing.

    Read the article

  • Python - Access a class from a list using a key

    - by Fake Name
    Is there any way to make a list of classes behave like a set in python? Basically, I'm working on a piece of software that does some involved string comparison, and I have a custom class for handling the strings. Therefore, there is an instance of the class for each string. As a result, I have a large list containing all these classes. I would like to be able to access them like list[key], where in this case, the key is a string the class is based off of. It seems to me that I sould be able to do this somewhat easily, by adding something like __cmp__ to the class, but either I'm being obtuse (likely), or Im missing someting in the docs. Basically, I want to be able to do something like this (Python prompt example): >>class a: ... def __init__(self, x): ... self.var = x ... >>> from test import a >>> cl = set([a("Hello"), a("World"), a("Pie")]) >>> print cl set([<test.a instance at 0x00C866C0>, <test.a instance at 0x00C866E8>, <test.a instance at 0x00C86710>]) >>> cl["World"] <test.a instance at 0x00C866E8> Thanks!

    Read the article

  • How does the below program work in c++?

    - by Srinivasa Varadan
    I have just created 2 pointers which has undefined behavior and try to invoke a class member function which has no object created ? I don't understand this? #include<iostream> using namespace std; class Animal { public: void talk() { cout<<"I am an animal"<<endl; } }; class Dog : public Animal { public: void talk() { cout<<"bark"<<endl; } }; int main() { Animal * a; Dog * d; d->talk(); a->talk(); }

    Read the article

  • CSS selector for first element with class

    - by Rajat
    I have a bunch of elements with a classname <p class="red"></p> <div class="red"></div> I cant seem to select the first element with the class="red" using the following CSS rule: .red:first-child{ border:5px solid red; } What is wrong in this selector and how to correct it ??

    Read the article

  • Java : Singleton class instances in a Web based Application

    - by Preethi Jain
    I have this Singleton class inside a Web Application . public class MyDAO { private static MyDAO instance; private MyDAO() { } public static MyDAO getInstance() { if (instance == null) { instance = new MyDAO(); } return instance; } I will access it this way public void get_Data() { MyDAO dao = MyDAO.getInstance(); } How many Objects of MyDAO class will be created if there are 3 Users accessing the Application ?? Will there be one instance of MyDAO per User ??

    Read the article

  • Apply CSS class to invalid controls on web form

    - by user137639
    I need to apply a css class to invalid controls on a web form. I'd like to make it a resusable class. This is what I have so far: public class Validation { public static void ApplyInvalidClass(Page page, string className) { foreach (System.Web.UI.WebControls.BaseValidator bv in page.Validators) { if (!bv.IsValid) { Control ctrl = page.FindControl(bv.ControlToValidate); if (ctrl != null) { if (ctrl is TextBox) { TextBox txt = ctrl as TextBox; txt.CssClass = "invalid"; } if (ctrl is DropDownList) { DropDownList ddl = ctrl as DropDownList; ddl.CssClass = "invalid"; } if (ctrl is CheckBox) { CheckBox cb = ctrl as CheckBox; cb.CssClass = "invalid"; } if (ctrl is HtmlGenericControl) { HtmlGenericControl html = ctrl as HtmlGenericControl; html.Attributes.Add("class", className); } } } } } } The problem is what I call this on a .Net user control, I guess because I'm passing in Page, page.FindControl(bv.ControlToValidate) is always null. Is there a better way to do this?

    Read the article

  • how to pass one variable value frm one class to the oder

    - by Arunabha
    i hav two packages one is com.firstBooks.series.db.parser which hav a java file XMLParser.java,i hav another package com.firstBooks.series79 which hav a class called AppMain.NW i want to send the value of a variable called _xmlFileName frm AppMain class to the xmlFile variable in XMLParser class,i am posting the codes for both the class,kindly help me. package com.firstBooks.series.db.parser; import java.io.IOException; import java.io.InputStream; import java.util.Vector; import net.rim.device.api.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilder; import net.rim.device.api.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory; import net.rim.device.api.xml.parsers.ParserConfigurationException; import org.w3c.dom.Document; import org.w3c.dom.Element; import org.w3c.dom.NodeList; import org.xml.sax.SAXException; import com.firstBooks.series.db.Question; public class XMLParser { private Document document; public static Vector questionList; public static String xmlFile; public XMLParser() { questionList = new Vector(); } public void parseXMl() throws SAXException, IOException, ParserConfigurationException { // Build a document based on the XML file. DocumentBuilderFactory factory = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance(); DocumentBuilder builder = factory.newDocumentBuilder(); InputStream inputStream = getClass().getResourceAsStream(xmlFile); document = builder.parse(inputStream); } public void parseDocument() { Element element = document.getDocumentElement(); NodeList nl = element.getElementsByTagName("question"); if (nl != null && nl.getLength() > 0) { for (int i = 0; i < nl.getLength(); i++) { Element ele = (Element) nl.item(i); Question question = getQuestions(ele); questionList.addElement(question); } } } private Question getQuestions(Element element) { String title = getTextValue(element, "title"); String choice1 = getTextValue(element, "choice1"); String choice2 = getTextValue(element, "choice2"); String choice3 = getTextValue(element, "choice3"); String choice4 = getTextValue(element, "choice4"); String answer = getTextValue(element, "answer"); String rationale = getTextValue(element, "rationale"); Question Questions = new Question(title, choice1, choice2, choice3, choice4, answer, rationale); return Questions; } private String getTextValue(Element ele, String tagName) { String textVal = null; NodeList nl = ele.getElementsByTagName(tagName); if (nl != null && nl.getLength() > 0) { Element el = (Element) nl.item(0); textVal = el.getFirstChild().getNodeValue(); } return textVal; } } Nw the code for AppMain class //#preprocess package com.firstBooks.series79; import net.rim.device.api.ui.UiApplication; import com.firstBooks.series.ui.screens.HomeScreen; public class AppMain extends UiApplication { public static String _xmlFileName; public static boolean _Lite; public static int _totalNumofQuestions; public static void initialize(){ //#ifndef FULL /* //#endif _xmlFileName = "/res/Series79_FULL.xml"; _totalNumofQuestions = 50; _Lite = false; //#ifndef FULL */ //#endif //#ifndef LITE /* //#endif _xmlFileName = "/res/Series79_LITE.xml"; _totalNumofQuestions = 10; _Lite = true; //#ifndef LITE */ //#endif } private AppMain() { initialize(); pushScreen(new HomeScreen()); } public static void main(String args[]) { new AppMain().enterEventDispatcher(); } }

    Read the article

  • Transparently storing class state without exposing implementation

    - by RoToRa
    I have a model (MVC) class whose internal state (which basically contains of private int fields) I want to store. The program is running on Android (for now) so I need to store the in a Bundle, but I'll be using the same class later in a desktop application where I'll have to store the state some other way, so I can't reference Bundle directly in my class. So my question is: What is the best way to store (and retrieve) the state of a class without exposing it's implementation? The best I could think of removing the private access modifier so that the fields become package accessible and create read/write helper classes in the same package, but that somehow seems wrong.

    Read the article

  • I want jQuery validator to add a class to the form element's parent

    - by Eystein
    How do I use jQuery validator to add/remove a classname (e.g. validate) on the form element's parent <li> so I can style everything related to that element by only setting the one classname? The markup is <li class="validate"> <label for="product">Product of interest <abbr title="Required field">*</abbr></label> <input id="product" type="text" name="product" value="" placeholder="e.g. school bench" class="required" minlength="2"> <!-- Hidden by CSS unless parent has 'validate' class --> <label for="product" class="description">Please name a product.</label> </li> and the default jQuery is $("#commentForm").validate();

    Read the article

  • How do I create static instances of a class inside that class?

    - by wehas
    I have a class Color that holds values for the red, green, and blue channels of a color. The class constructor lets you create a new color by specifying values for the three channels. However, for convenience, I would also like to have some "premade" colors available for the programmer. For example instead of having something like DrawRectangle(new Color(1, 0, 0)); you would be able to say DrawRectangle(Color.Red); Where Color.Red is an instance of Color that lives inside the Color class. How can I declare these instances of Color inside the Color class? If there is a name for this type of technique I'd like to know it as I had no idea what search terms to use when I was looking for help online.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147  | Next Page >