Search Results

Search found 6686 results on 268 pages for 'catch all'.

Page 142/268 | < Previous Page | 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149  | Next Page >

• Asp.net error object not set to a reference

  - by Frank

  Hi all, Because I rush in development (a lot of whip cracking here) and declare my objects at the top of the function and instantiate inside my try-catch block, I get a lot of the good old "object not set to an instance of an object" errors while doing TDD, and later if I do miss a branch that object was used in (doing VB now, would prefer C#) or just in every day coding, object not set to an instance of an object is a bit vague. Sure the stack trace sends me to the line the error occured at, but it would be nice if I could modify my logging to either name the object or its type because sometimes I have multiple objects on the same line. It's not the end of the world, but in the end it would save me a few minutes each day. Any ideas on how I can pass the info on which object wasn't set? Thanks

  Read the article

• Saving part of audio file (java)

  - by m159701m

  Hi evryone, While playing an audio file (.wav) I want , if I resort to ctrl+c , to stop the playback and save part of the audio file in a file called "file2.wav". Here's the thread I'd like to add to my code. Unfortunately it doesn't work at all. Thanks in advance class myThread extends Thread{ public void run(){ try { PipedOutputStream poStream = new PipedOutputStream(); PipedInputStream piStream = new PipedInputStream(); poStream.connect(piStream); File cutaudioFile = new File ("file2.wav"); AudioInputStream ais = new AudioInputStream(piStream, AudioFileFormat.Type.WAVE , cutaudioFile); poStream.write(ais,AudioFileFormat.Type.WAVE,cutaudioFile); }catch (Exception e){ e.printStackTrace(); } } // end run } // end myThread

  Read the article

• Visual Studio 2008 Macro for Building does not block thread

  - by Climber104

  Hello, I am trying to write a macro for Building my application, kicking off an external tool, and ataching the debugger to that external tool. Everything is working except for the building. It builds, but it is not blocking the thread so the external tool gets kicked off before it can finish. Is there a way I can run ExecuteCommand and wait for the thread to finish? Code is below: DTE.ExecuteCommand("ClassViewContextMenus.ClassViewProject.Build") DTE.ExecuteCommand("Tools.ExternalCommand11") Try Dim dbg2 As EnvDTE80.Debugger2 = DTE.Debugger Dim trans As EnvDTE80.Transport = dbg2.Transports.Item("Default") Dim dbgeng(1) As EnvDTE80.Engine dbgeng(0) = trans.Engines.Item("Managed") Dim proc2 As EnvDTE80.Process2 = dbg2.GetProcesses(trans, "MINIPC").Item("_nStep.exe") proc2.Attach2(dbgeng) Catch ex As System.Exception MsgBox(ex.Message) End Try

  Read the article

• SQLite Transaction fills a table BEFORE the transaction is commited

  - by user1500403

  Halo I have a code that creates a datatable (in memory) from a select SQL statement. However I realised that this datatable is filling during the procedure rather as a result of the transaction comit statment, it does the job but its slow. WHat amI doing wrong ? Inalready.Clear() 'clears a dictionary Using connection As New SQLite.SQLiteConnection(conectionString) connection.Open() Dim sqliteTran As SQLite.SQLiteTransaction = connection.BeginTransaction() Try oMainQueryR = "SELECT * FROM detailstable Where name= :name AND Breed= :Breed" Dim cmdSQLite As SQLite.SQLiteCommand = connection.CreateCommand() Dim oAdapter As New SQLite.SQLiteDataAdapter(cmdSQLite) With cmdSQLite .CommandType = CommandType.Text .CommandText = oMainQueryR .Parameters.Add(":name", SqlDbType.VarChar) .Parameters.Add(":Breed", SqlDbType.VarChar) End With Dim c As Long = 0 For Each row As DataRow In list.Rows 'this is the list with 500 names If Inalready.ContainsKey(row.Item("name")) Then Else c = c + 1 Form1.TextBox1.Text = " Fill .... " & c Application.DoEvents() Inalready.Add(row.Item("name"), row.Item("Breed")) cmdSQLite.Parameters(":name").Value = row.Item("name") cmdSQLite.Parameters(":Breed").Value = row.Item("Breed") oAdapter.Fill(newdetailstable) End If Next oAdapter.FillSchema(newdetailstable, SchemaType.Source) Dim z = newdetailstable.Rows.Count 'At this point the newdetailstable is already filled up and I havent even comited the transaction ' sqliteTran.Commit() Catch ex As Exception End Try End Using

  Read the article

• Google App Engine PersistenceManager can process multiple objects ?

  - by Frank

  I have some code like this : PersistenceManager pm=PMF.get().getPersistenceManager(); String query="select from "+PayPal_Message.class.getName()+" where processed == false order by time desc"; List<PayPal_Message> messages=(List<PayPal_Message>)pm.newQuery(query).execute(); if (messages.isEmpty()) { } else { for (PayPal_Message g : messages) { Contact_Info_Entry A_Contact_Entry=Process_PayPal_Message_To_Get_A_License(g.getContent().getValue()); pm=PMF.get().getPersistenceManager(); try { pm.makePersistent(A_Contact_Entry); g.setProcessed(true); pm.makePersistent(g); } catch (Exception e) { Send_Email(Email_From,"[email protected]","Servlet Error Message [ "+time+" ]",new Text(e.toString())); } // finally { pm.close(); } } } pm.close(); I wonder if it's ok to use the pm above to process multiple objects before closing it. Or do I have to get and close pm for processing each object ?

  Read the article

• How can a client try to reconnect to a server after a first failed try with WCF?

  - by djerry

  Hey guys, I'm using a client - server app. When a client starts, he gets a login-screen. When the server is not up yet, the call to the server will throw an exception which i catch (EndpointNotFoundException). I show a messagebox telling the user the server is offline. When he tries to reconnect again, it will throw another exception (CommunicationObjectFaultedException), even though the server is online. When a new client starts then, he can connect to the server. But the client who attempted before, still gets the error. My question now is how can the first client login after a failed first try without having to start his program again. So i want to clear the communicationchannel of its faulted state or something like that. Thanks in advance.

  Read the article

• How can I create a simple message box in Python?

  - by Carson Myers

  I'm looking for the same effect as alert() in JavaScript. I wrote a simple web-based interpreter this afternoon using Twisted.web. You basically submit a block of Python code through a form, and the client comes and grabs it and executes it. I want to be able to make a simple popup message, without having to re-write a whole bunch of boilerplate wxPython or TkInter code every time (since the code gets submitted through a form and then disappears). I've tried tkMessageBox: import tkMessageBox tkMessageBox.showinfo(title="Greetings", message="Hello World!") but this opens another window in the background with a tk icon. I don't want this. I was looking for some simple wxPython code but it always required setting up a class and entering an app loop etc. Is there no simple, catch-free way of making a message box in Python?

  Read the article

• connecting to exchange server

  - by MyHeadHurts

  I am using this code to connect to my exchange server. I am trying to retrieve an inbox of basically emails that have not been read however, i am just getting a bunch of gibberish and its reading an email. can you help me modify my code to just read the most recent messages. Try tcpClient.Connect(hostName, 110) Dim networkStream As NetworkStream = tcpClient.GetStream() Dim bytes(tcpClient.ReceiveBufferSize) As Byte Dim sendBytes As Byte() networkStream.Read(bytes, 0, CInt(tcpClient.ReceiveBufferSize)) sendBytes = Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes("User " + userName + vbCrLf) networkStream.Write(sendBytes, 0, sendBytes.Length) sTemp = networkStream.Read(bytes, 0, CInt(tcpClient.ReceiveBufferSize)) sendBytes = Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes("Pass " + userPassword + vbCrLf) networkStream.Write(sendBytes, 0, sendBytes.Length) sTemp = networkStream.Read(bytes, 0, CInt(tcpClient.ReceiveBufferSize)) sendBytes = Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes("STAT" + vbCrLf) networkStream.Write(sendBytes, 0, sendBytes.Length) sTemp = networkStream.Read(bytes, 0, CInt(tcpClient.ReceiveBufferSize)) sendBytes = Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes("RETR " + messageNumber + vbCrLf) networkStream.Write(sendBytes, 0, sendBytes.Length) networkStream.Read(bytes, 0, CInt(tcpClient.ReceiveBufferSize)) returnMessage = Encoding.ASCII.GetString(bytes) EmailContent.Text = returnMessage sendBytes = Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes("QUIT" + vbCrLf) networkStream.Write(sendBytes, 0, sendBytes.Length) tcpClient.Close() Catch ex As Exception EmailContent.Text = "Could not retrieve email or your inbox is empty" End Try

  Read the article

• Android Paypal One time Payment

  - by Ameya

  Hi All, Does any one know, or is it possible to do one time payment, with paypal in android ? Consider the senario. Buyer purchases installs free application. Clicks on paypal module and makes in-app payment, purchases feature successfully. Buyer deletes application. All information including the feature purchase enty in database is deleted. Buyer reinstalls the application. Here is the catch, if he wants to use the feature he will have to do a re-purchase. Which I wann to avoid in my application. This is taken care in iPhoen in-app purchase. That is if a buyer has already purchased an feture or in-app item, and if he trys to repurchase it (item has been set to one time payment) , the in-app purchase transaction will succeed without the user actually having to repay for the item. Is there an solution for this can anyone help.

  Read the article

• Problem at JUnit test with generics

  - by Tom Brito

  In my utility method: public static <T> T getField(Object obj, Class c, String fieldName) { try { Field field = c.getDeclaredField(fieldName); field.setAccessible(true); return (T) field.get(obj); } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); fail(); return null; } } The line return (T) field.get(obj); gives the warning "Type safety: Unchecked cast from Object to T"; but I cannot perform instanceof check against type parameter T, so what am I suppose to do here?

  Read the article

• Using thread in aspx-page making a webrequest

  - by Mike Ribeiro

  Hi, I kind of new to the hole threading stuff so bare with me here.. I have a aspx-page that takes some input and makes a reqest: HttpWebRequest request = (HttpWebRequest)WebRequest.Create(string.Format("{0}?{1}", strPostPath, strPostData)); request.Method = "GET"; request.Timeout = 5000; // set 5 sec. timeout request.ProtocolVersion = HttpVersion.Version11; try { HttpWebResponse response = (HttpWebResponse)request.GetResponse(); /do some with response } catch (WebException exce) { //Log some stuff } The thing is that this function is used ALOT. Is there any advantage to make every request in a separate thread and exactly how would that look like? Thx!

  Read the article

• C++ Constructor Initializer List - using member functions of initialized members

  - by Andy

  I've run into the following a few times with initializer lists and I've never been able to explain it well. Can anyone explain why exactly the following fails (I don't have a compiler to catch typos, so bear with me): class Foo { public: Foo( int i ) : m_i( i ) {} //works with no problem int getInt() {return m_i;} ~Foo {} private: int m_i; }; class Bar { public: Bar() : m_foo( 5 ), //this is ok m_myInt( m_foo.getInt() ) //runtime error, seg 11 {} ~Bar() {} private: Foo m_foo; int m_myInt; }; When trying to call member functions of members initialized higher up the initializer list, I get seg faults. I seem to recall this is a known problem (or perhaps somehow by design) but I've never seen it well described. The attached example is contrived with plain old data types, but substitute the Bar::m_myInt with another object lacking a default (empty) constructor and the issue is more real. Can anyone enlighten me? Thanks!

  Read the article

• Find selected WPF Listbox entries

  - by wonea

  I've been trying iterate through the selected items of a listbox in WPF, with the following code; try { for (int i = 0; i < mylistbox.SelectedItems.Count; i++) { ListItem li = (ListItem)mylistbox.SelectedItems[i]; string listitemcontents_str = li.ToString(); } } catch(Exception e) { // Error appears here string error = e.ToString(); } However I receive an invalid cast exception; System.InvalidCastException: Unable to cast object of type 'mylist' to type 'System.Windows.Documents.ListItem'. Is there a way around this?

  Read the article

• Problem with access to control properties in Multibox

  - by greatromul

  I used multibox-component to create lightbox-similar div. But I faced problem. I placed textbox with id ‘tbx_position’ in that div. I entered some symbols in textbox and then tried to read value via javascript-function (it had to alert document.getElementById(‘tbx_position’).value). Every time that value was empty. There is example of it. Furthermore, if I place in the div asp:Button, server OnClick-eventhandler doesn’t catch fire. Is any idea, what’s reason? Thanks.

  Read the article

• android html download and parse error

  - by Brahadeesh

  I am trying to download the html file using the ul of the page. I am using Jsoup. This is my code: TextView ptext = (TextView) findViewById(R.id.pagetext); Document doc = null; try { doc = (Document) Jsoup.connect(mNewLinkUrl).get(); } catch (IOException e) { Log.d(TAG, e.toString()); e.printStackTrace(); } NodeList nl = doc.getElementsByTagName("meta"); Element meta = (Element) nl.item(0); String title = meta.attr("title"); ptext.append("\n" + mNewLinkUrl); When running it, I am getting an error saying attr is not defined for the type element. What have I done wrong? Pardon me if this seems trivial.

  Read the article

• How to Stop Current Playing Song When using one thread with JLayer?

  - by mcnemesis

  I recently used a solution to the one-thread-at-a-time problem whe using Jlayer to play mp3 songs in Java. But this solution by Kaleb Brasee didn't hint at how you could stop the player, i.e how could one then call player.close()? Kaleb's code was: Executor executor = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor(); executor.execute(new Runnable() { public void run() { /* do something */ } }); and this is the code I put in run() if(player != null) player.close(); try{ player = new Player(new FileInputStream(musicD.getPath())); player.play(); }catch(Exception e){} The problem is that much as this solves the problem of keeping the gui active while the music plays (in only one other thread -- what i'd wanted), I can't start playing another song :-( What could I do?

  Read the article

• "Ambiguous template specialization" problem

  - by Setien

  I'm currently porting a heap of code that has previously only been compiled with Visual Studio 2008. In this code, there's an arrangement like this: template <typename T> T convert( const char * s ) { // slow catch-all std::istringstream is( s ); T ret; is >> ret; return ret; } template <> inline int convert<int>( const char * s ) { return (int)atoi( s ); } Generally, there are a lot of specializations of the templated function with different return types that are invoked like this: int i = convert<int>( szInt ); The problem is, that these template specializations result in "Ambiguous template specialization". If it was something besides the return type that differentiated these function specializations, I could obviously just use overloads, but that's not an option. How do I solve this without having to change all the places the convert functions are called?

  Read the article

• How to handle failure to release a resource which is contained in a smart pointer?

  - by cj

  How should an error during resource deallocation be handled, when the object representing the resource is contained in a shared pointer? Smart pointers are a useful tool to manage resources safely. Examples of such resources are memory, disk files, database connections, or network connections. // open a connection to the local HTTP port boost::shared_ptr<Socket> socket = Socket::connect("localhost:80"); In a typical scenario, the class encapsulating the resource should be noncopyable and polymorphic. A good way to support this is to provide a factory method returning a shared pointer, and declare all constructors non-public. The shared pointers can now be copied from and assigned to freely. The object is automatically destroyed when no reference to it remains, and the destructor then releases the resource. /** A TCP/IP connection. */ class Socket { public: static boost::shared_ptr<Socket> connect(const std::string& address); virtual ~Socket(); protected: Socket(const std::string& address); private: // not implemented Socket(const Socket&); Socket& operator=(const Socket&); }; But there is a problem with this approach. The destructor must not throw, so a failure to release the resource will remain undetected. A common way out of this problem is to add a public method to release the resource. class Socket { public: virtual void close(); // may throw // ... }; Unfortunately, this approach introduces another problem: Our objects may now contain resources which have already been released. This complicates the implementation of the resource class. Even worse, it makes it possible for clients of the class to use it incorrectly. The following example may seem far-fetched, but it is a common pitfall in multi-threaded code. socket->close(); // ... size_t nread = socket->read(&buffer[0], buffer.size()); // wrong use! Either we ensure that the resource is not released before the object is destroyed, thereby losing any way to deal with a failed resource deallocation. Or we provide a way to release the resource explicitly during the object's lifetime, thereby making it possible to use the resource class incorrectly. There is a way out of this dilemma. But the solution involves using a modified shared pointer class. These modifications are likely to be controversial. Typical shared pointer implementations, such as boost::shared_ptr, require that no exception be thrown when their object's destructor is called. Generally, no destructor should ever throw, so this is a reasonable requirement. These implementations also allow a custom deleter function to be specified, which is called in lieu of the destructor when no reference to the object remains. The no-throw requirement is extended to this custom deleter function. The rationale for this requirement is clear: The shared pointer's destructor must not throw. If the deleter function does not throw, nor will the shared pointer's destructor. However, the same holds for other member functions of the shared pointer which lead to resource deallocation, e.g. reset(): If resource deallocation fails, no exception can be thrown. The solution proposed here is to allow custom deleter functions to throw. This means that the modified shared pointer's destructor must catch exceptions thrown by the deleter function. On the other hand, member functions other than the destructor, e.g. reset(), shall not catch exceptions of the deleter function (and their implementation becomes somewhat more complicated). Here is the original example, using a throwing deleter function: /** A TCP/IP connection. */ class Socket { public: static SharedPtr<Socket> connect(const std::string& address); protected: Socket(const std::string& address); virtual Socket() { } private: struct Deleter; // not implemented Socket(const Socket&); Socket& operator=(const Socket&); }; struct Socket::Deleter { void operator()(Socket* socket) { // Close the connection. If an error occurs, delete the socket // and throw an exception. delete socket; } }; SharedPtr<Socket> Socket::connect(const std::string& address) { return SharedPtr<Socket>(new Socket(address), Deleter()); } We can now use reset() to free the resource explicitly. If there is still a reference to the resource in another thread or another part of the program, calling reset() will only decrement the reference count. If this is the last reference to the resource, the resource is released. If resource deallocation fails, an exception is thrown. SharedPtr<Socket> socket = Socket::connect("localhost:80"); // ... socket.reset();

  Read the article

• Timeout LinqToSql inserting millions of records

  - by Bas

  I'm inserting approximently 3 million records in a database using this solution. Eventually when the application has been inserting records for a while (my last run lasted around 4 hours), it gives a timeout with the following SqlException: "SqlExcepetion: Timeout expired. The timeoutperiod elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding." What's the best way to handle this exception? Is there a way to prevent this from happening or should I catch the exception? Thanks in advance!

  Read the article

• Sending an Email Using Java

  - by user217029

  try{ Properties props = new Properties(); props.put("mail.smtp.host", "ipc-smtp.bits-pilani.ac.in"); Session sess = Session.getInstance(props, null); sess.setDebug(true); Message msg = new MimeMessage(sess); InternetAddress addressFrom = new InternetAddress("[email protected]"); msg.setFrom(addressFrom); msg.setRecipient(Message.RecipientType.TO, new InternetAddress("[email protected]")); msg.addHeader("MyHeaderName", "myHeaderValue"); msg.setSubject("Test"); msg.setContent("Yippe", "text/plain"); Transport.send(msg); }catch(Exception exp){ exp.printStackTrace(); } The error is javax.mail.MessagingException: 554 The mail was blocked due to zen-spamhaus RBL action This is my college's smtp server.

  Read the article

• Client-side session timeout redirect in ASP.Net

  - by Mercury821

  I want to build a way to automatically redirect users to Timeout.aspx when their session expires due to inactivity. My application uses forms authentication and relies heavily on update panels within the same aspx page for user interaction, so I don't want to simply redirect after a page-level timer expires. For the same reason, I can't use '<meta http-equiv="refresh"/>' What I want to do is create a simple ajax web service with a method called IsSessionTimedOut(), that simply returns a boolean. I will use a javascript timer to periodically call the method, and if it returns true, then redirect to Timeout.aspx. However, I don't want calling this method to reset the session timeout timer, or the session would never time out because of the service call. Is there a clean way to avoid this catch-22? Hopefully there is an easy solution that has so far eluded me.

  Read the article

• Zend Framework: how to remove rendered views in the controller?

  - by takpar

  i want to render one of these sets of views: head body-$id1 foot OR head body-$id2 foot which set exsists. i do it like this: try { $this->render("head"); $this->render("body-$id1"); $this->render("foot"); } catch (Exception $e) { $this->render("head"); $this->render("body-$id2"); $this->render("foot"); } but it causes the head view be rendered twice if body-$id1 does not exists. do you have a better solution? in another saying, may i check the existance of body-$id1 before rendering it?

  Read the article

• How to populate gridview on button_click after searching from access database?

  - by Usman

  I am creating a form in c#.net . I want to populate the gridview only on button click with entries meeting search criteria. I have tried but on searching ID it works but on searching FirstName it gives error plz check SQL also. My Code behind private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { try { string strConn = "Provider=Microsoft.ACE.OLEDB.12.0;Data Source=L:/New project/Project/Project/Data.accdb"; string sql = "SELECT * FROM AddressBook WHERE FirstName='" + textBox1.Text.ToString(); OleDbConnection connection = new OleDbConnection(strConn); OleDbDataAdapter dataadapter = new OleDbDataAdapter(sql, connection); DataSet ds = new DataSet(); connection.Open(); dataadapter.Fill(ds, "AddressBook"); connection.Close(); dataGridView1.DataSource = ds; dataGridView1.DataMember = "AddressBook"; } catch (System.Exception err) { this.label27.Visible = true; this.label27.Text = err.Message.ToString(); } }

  Read the article

• Weblogic Apache plugin and session stickiness

  - by h4tech

  If two webserver are configured in between a load balancer and weblogic cluster, will the two Apache server maintain session stickiness.?? Say for e.g. the load balancer forwards the first request to the 1st apache and inturn 1st apache forwards to 1st WL managed instance.Even if the second req from the same user is forwarded by the load balancer to the second apache, will the sec apache be able to forward it to the 1st WLManaged instance which served the first request rather than the sec WLManaged instance which is not aware of the session information at all.What should ideally be the behaviour of weblogic apache plugin??.Catch is i dont want ot enable the session replication @ the wl server cluster..Pls help.

  Read the article

• Regexp look-behind to match internet speeds

  - by Sandman

  So the user may search for "10 mbit" after which I want to capture the "10" so I can use it in a speed-search rather than a string-search. This isn't a problem, the below regexp does this fine: if (preg_match("/(\d+)\smbit/", $string)){ ... } But, the user may search for something like "10/10 mbit" or "10-100 mbit". I don't want to match those with the above regexp - they should be handled in another fashion. So I would like a regexp that matches "10 mbit" if the number is all-numeric as a whole word (i.e. contained by whitespace, newline or lineend/linestart) Using lookbehind, I did this: if (preg_match("#(?<!/)(\d+)\s+mbit#i", $string)){ Just to catch those that doesn't have "/" before them, but this matched true for this string: "10/10 mbit" so I'm obviously doing something wrong here, but what?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149  | Next Page >