Search Results

Search found 18693 results on 748 pages for 'browser extension'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 144/748 | < Previous Page | 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151  | Next Page >

  • What characters are widely supported in CSS class names?

    - by last-child
    As detailed here among other places, the only valid characters in a html/css class name is a-z, A-Z, 0-9, hyphen and underscore, and the first character should be a letter. But in practice, what characters are in fact supported by most browsers? More specifically, I wonder what browsers properly understands a slash (/) in a class name, and what browsers support class names starting with a number. I'm primarily interested in getting an answer for html rather than xhtml, in case there is a difference. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • How does IE8 handle xml header.

    - by markovuksanovic
    I was wondering where I can find some information how IE8 actually handles xml header... for example how is handling <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> different to <?xml version="1.0"?>. One other questions would be how FF handles those header. How is that different to IE8. I am almost 100% sure that they handle them differently but am still doing some research. /Marko

    Read the article

  • Please help! Website isn't displaying correctly in IE7

    - by Castgame
    Hey All, I recently designed a site in Drupal and it is perfect in FireFox and Safari, but wont' display correctly in IE6 or IE7. The site might be NSFW, but it's just a Pickup Artist Website: http://bradp.com. Could someone point me in the right direction of what to fix? I'd be very grateful. Thanks, Nick

    Read the article

  • step attribute not working with HTML5 <input type="range"> on Safari

    - by Claudiu
    Are there known issues with range inputs not working fully on Safari? I have the following input element: <input type=?"range" min=?"0" max=?"360" step=?"0.0001" value=?"0">? On Chrome, the input goes according to the step variable. On Safari, it only goes by integer values. Even setting the step to 10 still makes it go by increments of 1. I'm confused because I thought Chrome and Safari both used WebKit.

    Read the article

  • Numbers localization

    - by Reza
    How can I set the variant of Arabic numeral without changing number characters ? Eastern Arabic ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Persian variant ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Western Arabic 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 here is a sample code: <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <meta charset="utf-8"> <head> <title></title> </head> <body> <div lang="fa">123456789</div> <div lang="ar">123456789</div> <div lang="en">123456789</div> </body> </html> Also note that in Windows text boxes (e.g. Run) numbers are displayed correctly according to surrounding text languages.

    Read the article

  • Future of IE9: Opacity + Performance

    - by chris_l
    I just tried the IE9 "Second Internet Explorer Platform Preview" - which supports CSS opacity now. That's nice, but I tried it with one of my website prototypes, and it's quite slow when scrolling etc. Admittedly, the prototype uses hundreds of images with opacity != 1, but everything is snappy with current versions of Firefox, Safari, Chrome and Opera. Does anybody know, if there are plans for IE9 to become faster in this area? Even rumours about this would be interesting in this case.

    Read the article

  • How do I make my horizontally scrolling page work in IE?

    - by Jessica
    I am using a horizontal scroll for a page on my website ~ works great in FF but not in IE, how can i get it to work in IE? Here is the JS that I have in the head of my html: <script src="js/jquery-1.2.6.min.js" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script> <script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"> $(function(){ $("#page-wrap").wrapInner("<table><tr>"); $(".post").wrap("<td>"); });</script> There is also of course the other script file, but its huge so I'm not going to post it here. Is there a hack or something I can use to get it to scroll correctly in IE? Thx in advance!

    Read the article

  • Are these Mozilla-specific CSS styles doing anything?

    - by DisgruntledGoat
    I'm working with some CSS (from a Joomla template) like this: div#logo { -moz-background-clip: border; -moz-background-inline-policy: continuous; -moz-background-origin: padding; background: transparent url(../images/head.png) no-repeat scroll 0 0; ... } I've looked up some of those -moz- properties and they seem to be assigned their default values, and if I turn them off in Firebug nothing happens visibly. Would there be a reason to add them to a CSS file? Are they for an old version of Firefox perhaps?

    Read the article

  • What's the current (as of April 2010) state of affairs regarding <object> vs <embed> in HTML?

    - by rvdm
    The age old question. <object> vs <embed>. From what I gather, <object> is the XHTML-compliant way of doing things, while <embed> is for legacy support. I'm currently building a Flash application that will contain a pre-made embedding code for users to copy and paste, and I'm wondering if it's feasible to simply dump the <embed> tag altogether. Which browsers would be unable to load my application if I gave my users an <object>-only embed code? Thanks :)

    Read the article

  • c# open webrowser in many tab

    - by tee
    how can i create tab tab1 open samsung.com tab2 open hp.com ... using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.ComponentModel; using System.Data; using System.Drawing; using System.Linq; using System.Text; using System.Windows.Forms; namespace browsergotosamsung { public partial class Form1 : Form { public Form1() { InitializeComponent(); } private void Form1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { webBrowser1.Navigate("http://www.samsung.com"); webBrowser2.Navigate("http://www.hp.com"); webBrowser3.Navigate("http://www.IBM.com"); } private void webBrowser1_DocumentCompleted(object sender, WebBrowserDocumentCompletedEventArgs e) { } private void webBrowser3_DocumentCompleted(object sender, WebBrowserDocumentCompletedEventArgs e) { } private void webBrowser2_DocumentCompleted(object sender, WebBrowserDocumentCompletedEventArgs e) { webBrowser2.Size } } }

    Read the article

  • Why does this Javascript work in FF3.6? new Date("2010-06-09T19:20:30+01:00");

    - by thegaw
    Here's the sample code: var d = new Date("2010-06-09T19:20:30+01:00"); document.write(d); On FF3.6 this will give you: Wed Jun 09 2010 14:20:30 GMT-0400 (EST) Other browers tested; Chrome 5, Safari 4, IE7 give: Invalid Date I know there is limited to no support for ISO8601 dates, but does anyone know what and/or where the difference is in FF3.6 that allows this to work? My thought is that FF is just stripping out what it doesn't understand while the others are not. Has anyone else seen this and/or getting different results from the test script?

    Read the article

  • Accessing ASP.NET Development Server from another pc on the network

    - by Paul Knopf
    I would like to test my web app in other browsers. I have installed Virtual PC to do just that. the ASP.NET development server does not allow remote connections so the virtual pc (another computer on the network) cannot access the website. I found this post that was started but there was no solution. I understand that using localhost will not work. I heard about using the machines ip, but how do I get that correct ip? Look at my lynksys router admin? If I were to get as far as getting my IP, im sure that the asp.net dev server does not allow remote connections. How do I enable it to do so?

    Read the article

  • what is the relation between actual pixels and html(css) pixels in blackberry?

    - by HelpMeToHelpYou
    I am implementing one phonegap application. here everything going fine but when i am talking device specifications like 1)BlackBerry Bold Touch 9900 Screen specifications are as following Body Dimensions 115 x 66 x 10.5 mm (4.53 x 2.60 x 0.41 in) Weight 130 g (4.59 oz) Keyboard QWERTY Display Type TFT capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors Size 640 x 480 pixels, 2.8 inches (~286 ppi pixel density) But when i test following function in java script function findScreenSize() { alert("width:"+window.innerWidth +"Height:"+ window.innerHeight); } it displaying SIZE width : 356 Height : 267 (356 x 267) 2)BlackBerry Bold Touch 9930 Screen specifications are as following Body Dimensions 115 x 66 x 10.5 mm (4.53 x 2.60 x 0.41 in) Weight 130 g (4.59 oz) Keyboard QWERTY - Touch-sensitive controls Display Type TFT capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors Size 640 x 480 pixels, 2.8 inches (~286 ppi pixel density) then i run same javaScript function i got following output it displaying SIZE width : 417 Height : 313 (417 x 313) why it is behaving like this ? Can anybody know relation between core pixel and HTML pixel please give answer

    Read the article

  • Why does a checkbox remain checked in FF3 but not in IE, Chrome or ...

    - by sirrocco
    So - I have a checkbox <asp:CheckBox ID="chkOrder" runat="server" Visible='<%#IsCheckBoxVisible() %>' Checked="false" OnCheckedChanged="chkOrder_CheckedChanged" AutoPostBack="true" EnableViewState="false"></asp:CheckBox> the one above. Now, the checkbox is in a gridview and on databound - for all the rows in the gridview the checkbox is set to false. The problem is that the first checkbox is still true checked. In IE the problem doesn't exist, same for Chrome. I'm running out of options. Also if i use $("checkboxName").attr("checked"); // verified on jquery ready function. In FF it is true; IE false; Chrome false. Any tips? EDIT Now get ready for this : in the generated html - there is NO checked attribute. The diff between FF and IE is exactly the same. Another thing - the grid that contains the checkboxes has an ajax panel on it and when I page the grid, try to go to page 2 - the checkedChanged in codebehind is triggered.

    Read the article

  • Safari 5 vs. Safari 4 : Are there any compatibility differences?

    - by Cole
    I recently obtained a Mac so I could test our sites on Safari and Firefox for Mac OS. Now that Safari 5 is out, I'm not sure what I should do about upgrading. I presume what works on Safari 5 works on Safari 4, but I can't be sure, and vice versa. So, I don't know if I should upgrade and test on Safari 5 or keep on with Safari 4. Are there any major differences between these two version in terms of CSS (2.1) handling or JavaScript? When do you think the majority of people will have Safari 5 instead of 4? All thoughts appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Memory leak in Mozilla when unloading stylesheets

    - by KaptajnKold
    I'm working with Mozilla v1.7.12 on a constrained device (a Motorola set-top box) trying to resolve some memory leaks. When I dynamically load a stylesheet which refers to some large images, I can see that the amount of consumed memory increases in correspondance with the size of the images. This is what I would expect. Then, when I remove the stylesheet from the DOM, I would expect the memory to be freed. However, this does not happen. This is a problem, because the web application I'm working on needs to be able to dynamically load and and unload stylesheets potentially many times in the lifetime of the page. My question therefore is this: Is what I'm seeing expected behavior or is it a known bug? Is there a way to work around this? I should point out that I've set the expires header to -1 on all the images in the stylesheet.

    Read the article

  • What is the best way to prevent a webpage coded completely in HTML (no PHP or any server side langua

    - by racl101
    I thought by placing these two lines that it would prevent the page from being cached but this is not the case between the head tags: <meta http-equiv="pragma" content="no-cache" /> <meta http-equiv="cache-control" content="no-cache" /> As already mentioned this is on server that doesn't support PHP (or any server side language, well, that's not true, it has cgi-bin folder that supports perl scripts but I don't know perl and have no time to engage in it.) What else could I do to prevent the page from caching? It caches on Firefox and IE (and not so much in Chrome or Safari.)

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151  | Next Page >