Search Results

Search found 2601 results on 105 pages for 'commit'.

Page 15/105 | < Previous Page | 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22  | Next Page >

  • Git: Create a branch from unstagged/uncommited changes on master

    - by knoopx
    Context: I'm working on master adding a simple feature. After a few minutes I realize it was not so simple and it should have been better to work into a new branch. This always happens to me and I have no idea how to switch to another branch and take all these uncommited changes with me leaving the master branch clean. I supposed git stash && git stash branch new_branch would simply accomplish that but this is what I get: ~/test $ git status # On branch master nothing to commit (working directory clean) ~/test $ echo "hello!" > testing ~/test $ git status # On branch master # Changed but not updated: # (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed) # (use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory) # # modified: testing # no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a") ~/test $ git stash Saved working directory and index state WIP on master: 4402b8c testing HEAD is now at 4402b8c testing ~/test $ git status # On branch master nothing to commit (working directory clean) ~/test $ git stash branch new_branch Switched to a new branch 'new_branch' # On branch new_branch # Changed but not updated: # (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed) # (use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory) # # modified: testing # no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a") Dropped refs/stash@{0} (db1b9a3391a82d86c9fdd26dab095ba9b820e35b) ~/test $ git s # On branch new_branch # Changed but not updated: # (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed) # (use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory) # # modified: testing # no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a") ~/test $ git checkout master M testing Switched to branch 'master' ~/test $ git status # On branch master # Changed but not updated: # (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed) # (use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory) # # modified: testing # no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a") Do you know if there is any way of accomplishing this?

    Read the article

  • What Happens to Commit Logs on a Branch After Merging?

    - by Levi Hackwith
    Scenario: Programmer creates a branch for project 'foo' called 'my_foo' at revision 5 Programmer makes multiple changes to multiple files as he works on the 'my_foo' feature. At the end of each major step, say adding several new functions to class, the programmer does an svn commit on the appropriate files therefore committing them to the branch After several weeks and many commits later (each commit having a commit log describing what he did), the programmer merges the branch back into the trunk: #Assume the following is being done from inside a working copy of the trunk: svn merge -r 5:15 file:///path/to/repo/branches/my_foo Hazzah! he's merged all his changes back into trunk! There's much rejoicing and drinking of Mountain Dew. Now let's say another programmer comes along a week later and updates their working copy from revision 5 to revision 15. "Wow", they say. "I wonder what's changed since revision 5". The programmer then does an svn status on their working copy and they get something like this: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r15 | programmer1 | 2010-03-20 21:27:04 -0400 (Sat, 20 Mar 2010) | 1 line Merging Version 2.0 Changes into trunk ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r5 | programmer2 | 2010-02-15 10:59:55 -0500 (Mon, 15 Feb 2010) | 1 line Added assets/images/tumblr_icon.png to trunk What the heck happened to all the notes that the other programmer put in with all of his commits in his branch? Do those not get pulled over during a merge? Am I crazy or just forgetting something?

    Read the article

  • With NHibernate and Transaction do I rollback on commit failure or does it auto rollback on single c

    - by mattcodes
    I've built the following Dispose method for my Unit Of Work which essentially wraps the active NH session & transaction (transaction set as variable after opening session as to not be replaced if NH session gets new transaction after error) public void Dispose() { Func<ITransaction,bool> transactionStateOkayFunc = trans => trans != null && trans.IsActive && !trans.WasRolledBack; try { if(transactionStateOkayFunc(this.transaction)) { if (HasErrored) { transaction.Rollback(); } else { try { transaction.Commit(); } catch (Exception) { if(transactionStateOkayFunc(transaction)) transaction.Rollback(); throw; } } } } finally { if(transaction != null) transaction.Dispose(); if(session.IsOpen) session.Close(); } I can't help feeling that code is a little bloated, will a transaction automatically rollback is a discrete Commit fails in the case of non-nested transactions? Will Commit or Rollback automatically Dipose the transaction? If not will Session.Close() automatically dispose the associated transaction?

    Read the article

  • How do I commit changes to a text file on button press?

    - by boywithaxe
    I've written a small app that creates a GUI for setting up uShare. Currently it depends heavily on the 'w' (write) and 'a' (append) functions to generate/edit ushare.conf file. But I've been trying to find a way for the app to store all the changes until a save button is pressed, and only then committing them to the actual file. I think that would be the best way of getting around having the user press enter every time they change any field (and indeed allow for GtkCheckButton).

    Read the article

  • How can I refactor a code base while others rapidly commit to it?

    - by Incognito
    I'm on a private project that eventually will become open source. We have a few team members, talented enough with the technologies to build apps, but not dedicated developers who can write clean/beautiful and most importantly long-term maintainable code. I've set out to refactor the code base, but it's a bit unwieldy as someone in the team out in another country I'm not in regular contact with could be updating this totally separate thing. I know one solution is to communicate rapidly or adopt better PM practices, but we're just not that big yet. I just want to clean up the code and merge nicely into what he has updated. Would a branch be a suitable plan? A best-effort-merge? Something else?

    Read the article

  • What does transaction.commit() do when the flushmode is set manual in Hibernate?

    - by wei
    Here is a block of code in the Java Persistence with Hibernate book by Christian and Gavin, Session session = getSessionFactory().openSession(); session.setFlushMode(FlushMode.MANUAL); // First step in the conversation session.beginTransaction(); Item item = (Item) session.get(Item.class, new Long(123) ); session.getTransaction().commit(); // Second step in the conversation session.beginTransaction(); Item newItem = new Item(); Long newId = (Long) session.save(newItem); // Triggers INSERT! session.getTransaction().commit(); // Roll back the conversation! session.close();//enter code here I am confused that why the first step and second step need to be wrapped into two separate transactions? Since the flushmode is set manual here, no operations (suppose we ignore the insert here) will hit the database anyway. So why bother with transactions here? thanks

    Read the article

  • Django - model.save(commit=False - Is there a way to replicate this?

    - by orokusaki
    I'm wanting to do this: from django.contrib.auth.models import User class PetFrog(models.Model): user = models.OnetoOneField(User) color = models.CharField(max_length=20) def clean(self): if self.color == 'Green': user = User(username='prince') user.save(commit=False) # No commit argument in models.Model.save() like there is in ModelForm.save() user.set_password(self.password) user.save() self.user = user Is there a way to do this creation of a model instance without filling in all the required fields, and then setting them manually before trying to save() for real (which would obviously raise a "Must choose a Password" error)? I need to do this in my model, vs using a ModelForm. If there is another way to do it (while still in clean()), I'm completely open to any suggestions.

    Read the article

  • Does it make sense to commit after every save with a DVCS?

    - by blockhead
    I know the question has been asked before how often to commit with a DVCS. All answers have one thing in common--as often as possible. But they're usually something like, after finishing a thought, a user story, getting code that compiles, or passing tests. I was thinking, given that a DVCS gives you you're own repository, with very cheap commits, doesn't it make sense, to commit after every change to a file? After all, this is what happens in NetBeans, and you get a nice free "time machine" without even asking for it. If not every change, then at least every save, or compile. Does this make sense, or do I have the wrong idea about DVCS. My feeling is that this not the workflow most people have with DVCS.

    Read the article

  • jqGrid: Is it possible to commit a cell change when tabbing off instead of pressing Enter?

    - by The Matt
    I have a simple in-line edit in my grid, and I want to commit the change when the user tabs off the textbox. The default behavior of jqGrid forces the user to press 'Enter' to commit the change, but this is non-intuitive for our users. onSelectRow: function(id) { $(gridCoreGroups).editRow(id, true, undefined, function(response) { alert("hello world"); } } I've worked my way through the events provided, but they all happen as a result of the user pressing 'Enter', which I want to avoid. Is there something I can wire up that would trigger an action when the user tabs off this cell?

    Read the article

  • Things I've noticed with DVCS

    - by Wes McClure
    Things I encourage: Frequent local commits This way you don't have to be bothered by changes others are making to the central repository while working on a handful of related tasks.  It's a good idea to try to work on one task at a time and commit all changes at partitioned stopping points.  A local commit doesn't have to build, just FYI, so a stopping point doesn't mean a build point nor a point that you can push centrally.  There should be several of these in any given day.  2 hours is a good indicator that you might not be leveraging the power of frequent local commits.  Once you have verified a set of changes works, save them away, otherwise run the risk of introducing bugs into it when working on the next task.  The notion of a task By task I mean a related set of changes that can be completed in a few hours or less.  In the same token don’t make your tasks so small that critically related changes aren’t grouped together.  Use your intuition and the rest of these principles and I think you will find what is comfortable for you. Partial commits Sometimes one task explodes or unknowingly encompasses other tasks, at this point, try to get to a stopping point on part of the work you are doing and commit it so you can get that out of the way to focus on the remainder.  This will often entail committing part of the work and continuing on the rest. Outstanding changes as a guide If you don't commit often it might mean you are not leveraging your version control history to help guide your work.  It's a great way to see what has changed and might be causing problems.  The longer you wait, the more that has changed and the harder it is to test/debug what your changes are doing! This is a reason why I am so picky about my VCS tools on the client side and why I talk a lot about the quality of a diff tool and the ability to integrate that with a simple view of everything that has changed.  This is why I love using TortoiseHg and SmartGit: they show changed files, a diff (or two way diff with SmartGit) of the current selected file and a commit message all in one window that I keep maximized on one monitor at all times. Throw away / stash commits There is extreme value in being able to throw away a commit (or stash it) that is getting out of hand.  If you do not commit often you will have to isolate the work you want to commit from the work you want to throw away, which is wasted productivity and highly prone to errors.  I find myself doing this about once a week, especially when doing exploratory re-factoring.  It's much easier if I can just revert all outstanding changes. Sync with the central repository daily The rest of us depend on your changes.  Don't let them sit on your computer longer than they have to.  Waiting increases the chances of merge conflict which just decreases productivity.  It also prohibits us from doing deploys when people say they are done but have not merged centrally.  This should be done daily!  Find a way to partition the work you are doing so that you can sync at least once daily. Things I discourage: Lots of partial commits right at the end of a series of changes If you notice lots of partial commits at the end of a set of changes, it's likely because you weren't frequently committing, nor were you watching for the size of the task expanding beyond a single commit.  Chances are this cost you productivity if you use your outstanding changes as a guide, since you would have an ever growing list of changes. Committing single files Committing single files means you waited too long and no longer understand all the changes involved.  It may mean there were overlapping changes in single files that cannot be isolated.  In either case, go back to the suggestions above to avoid this.  Committing frequently does not mean committing frequently right at the end of a day's work. It should be spaced out over the course of several tasks, not all at the end in a 5 minute window.

    Read the article

  • Looping over commits for a file with jGit

    - by Andy Jarrett
    I've managed to get to grips with the basics of jGit file in terms of connecting to a repos and adding, commiting, and even looping of the commit messages for the files. File gitDir = new File("/Users/myname/Sites/helloworld/.git"); RepositoryBuilder builder = new RepositoryBuilder(); Repository repository; repository = builder.setGitDir(gitDir).readEnvironment() .findGitDir().build(); Git git = new Git(repository); RevWalk walk = new RevWalk(repository); RevCommit commit = null; // Add all files // AddCommand add = git.add(); // add.addFilepattern(".").call(); // Commit them // CommitCommand commit = git.commit(); // commit.setMessage("Commiting from java").call(); Iterable<RevCommit> logs = git.log().call(); Iterator<RevCommit> i = logs.iterator(); while (i.hasNext()) { commit = walk.parseCommit( i.next() ); System.out.println( commit.getFullMessage() ); } What I want to do next is be able to get all the commit message for a single file and then be able revert the single file back to a specific reference/point in time.

    Read the article

  • Global Temporary Table "On commit delete rows" functionality discrepancy.

    - by TomatoSandwich
    I have a global temporary table. I called my GTT, for that was it's initials. My GTT never hurt anyone, and did everything I bade of it. I asked my GTT to delete rows on commit. This is a valid function in the creation script of my GTT in oracle. I wanted to be able to have different users see GTT with their own data, and not the data of other people's sessions. 'Delete rows on commit' worked perfectly in our test environment. GTT and I were happy. But then, I deployed GTT as part of an update to functionality to a client's database. The database doesn't like to play well with GTT. GTT called me up all upset and worried, because it wasn't holding any data any more, and didn't know why. GTT told me that if someone did: insert into my_GTT (description) values ('Happy happy joy joy') he would sing-song back: 1 row inserted. However, if the same person tried select * from my_GTT; GTT didn't know what to do, and he replied 0 rows returned. GTT was upset that he didn't know what his playmate had inserted. Please, Stackoverflow, why would GTT forget what was placed into him? He can remember perfectly well at home, but out in the cold harsh world, he just gets so scared. :(

    Read the article

  • Can a Snapshot transaction fail and only partially commit in a TransactionScope?

    - by Travis Brooks
    Greetings I stumbled onto a problem today that seems sort of impossible to me, but its happening...I'm calling some database code in c# that looks something like this: using(var tran = MyDataLayer.Transaction()) { MyDataLayer.ExecSproc(new SprocTheFirst(arg1, arg2)); MyDataLayer.CallSomethingThatEventuallyDoesLinqToSql(arg1, argEtc); tran.Commit(); } I've simplified this a bit for posting, but whats going on is MyDataLayer.Transaction() makes a TransactionScope with the IsolationLevel set to Snapshot and TransactionScopeOption set to Required. This code gets called hundreds of times a day, and almost always works perfectly. However after reviewing some data I discovered there are a handful of records created by "SprocTheFirst" but no corresponding data from "CallSomethingThatEventuallyDoesLinqToSql". The only way that records should exist in the tables I'm looking at is from SprocTheFirst, and its only ever called in this one function, so if its called and succeeded then I would expect CallSomethingThatEventuallyDoesLinqToSql would get called and succeed because its all in the same TransactionScope. Its theoretically possible that some other dev mucked around in the DB, but I don't think they have. We also log all exceptions, and I can find nothing unusual happening around the time that the records from SprocTheFirst were created. So, is it possible that a transaction, or more properly a declarative TransactionScope, with Snapshot isolation level can fail somehow and only partially commit?

    Read the article

  • How to rebase onto a private branch with conflicts in gerrit/git?

    - by edwardmlyte
    Aim: I want to rebase commit G from "bravo", onto commit F from "alpha". From this: G bravo / D--E--F alpha / A--B--C mainline To this: G bravo / D--E--F alpha / A--B--C mainline "alpha" has been successfully rebased onto the latest mainline work. I cherry-pick "alpha" onto C. And when I cherry-pick "bravo", it comes up with all the merge conflicts. Once I fix those, if I do commit --amend The commit message just has all the information for alpha, whereas I'd expect the information for bravo. So I tried again after hard resetting to C, doing pull (as oppose to cherry-pick) for alpha and then pull bravo. Fixed the conflicts and just ran: commit The commit message just lists it as a merge and has merge information. Though the commit succeeds, I can't push this to gerrit as it says I don't have the rights to push merges. When I've read about rebase, it's always just to mainline, but I want to rebase private branches. Where am I going wrong?

    Read the article

  • git destroyed my changes

    - by mare
    I made a commit of my repository a week ago but never actually pushed it to the remote at github, which I did today. However, in the time from my commit I made many changes to the source. But just the initial commit was pushed to remote and while doing it, it also overwrote my local files. What can I do to get back my current files?? For better understanding, this is what I've done: Created new VS project and created a new git repository in it, Performed an initial scan, stage and commit but without adding a remote and performing a push, Worked on files for a week, (Today) Forgot to perform rescan, new stage and commit and just created new GitHub repository and performed this: git remote add origin [email protected]:myaccount/webshop.git git push origin master Now the files in GitHub repository are the ones from inital commit and those were also copied over my current files, so I'm in the initial commit stage now locally too, which is awful. Help appreciated

    Read the article

  • Subversion hooks no longer running

    - by Chris Lieb
    I don't know when this started happening, but, for some reason, none of my Subversion hooks are running anymore. I am running Subversion 1.6.9 on a Gentoo Linux machine, which has had its hooks work in the past. I am running Subversion through the svn_dav module for Apache2.2. I modified the hook scripts that I make use of to write into a file in the /tmp directory owned by apache:apache whenever they are executed, but after making a commit, there is nothing in the file that should be written to. The scripts are executable and owned by apache:apache, so I don't think that is the issue. Here is one of my test scripts (post-commit.sh) that isn't getting executed: #!/bin/sh /bin/echo post-commit >> /tmp/z_test exit 0 After running a commit, I expect both the pre-commit.sh and post-commit.sh hooks to be run, but neither of them appear to be writing into the desired file (/tmp/z_test). What's going on?

    Read the article

  • git local master branch stopped tracking remotes/origin/master, can't push

    - by Paul Smith
    Just when I thought I'd got the hang of the git checkout -b newbranch - commit/commit/commit - git checkout master - git merge newbranch - git rebase -i master - git push workflow in git, something blew up, and I can't see any reason for it. Here's the general workflow, which has worked for me in the past: # make sure I'm up to date on master: $ git checkout master $ git pull # k, no conflicts # start my new feature $ git checkout -b FEATURE9 # master @ 2f93e34 Switched to a new branch 'FEATURE9' ... work, commit, work, commit, work, commit... $ git commit -a $ git checkout master $ git merge FEATURE9 $ git rebase -i master # squash some of the FEATURE9 ugliness Ok so far; now what I expect to see -- and normally do see -- is this: $ git status # On branch master # Your branch is ahead of 'origin/master' by 1 commit. # nothing to commit (working directory clean) But instead, I only see "nothing to commit (working directory clean)", no "Your branch is ahead of 'origin/master' by 1 commit.", and git pull shows this weirdness: $ git pull From . # unexpected * branch master -> FETCH_HEAD # unexpected Already up-to-date. # expected And git branch -a -v shows this: $ git branch -a -v FEATURE9 3eaf059 started feature 9 * master 3eaf059 started feature 9 remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master remotes/origin/master 2f93e34 some boring previous commit # should=3eaf059 git branch clearly shows that I'm currently on * master, and git log clearly shows that master (local) is at 3eaf059, while remotes/origin/HEAD - remotes/origin/master is stuck back at the fork. Ideally I'd like to know the semantics of how I might have gotten into this, but I would settle for a way to get my working copy tracking the remote master again & get the two back in sync without losing history. Thanks! (Note: I re-cloned the repo in a new directory and manually re-applied the changes, and everything worked fine, but I don't want that to be the standard workaround.) Addendum: The title says "can't push", but there's no error message. I just get the "already up to date" response even though git branch -a -v shows that local master is ahead of /remotes/origin/master. Here's the output from git pull and git remote -v, respectively: $ git pull From . * branch master -> FETCH_HEAD Already up-to-date. $ git remote -v origin [email protected]:proj.git (fetch) origin [email protected]:proj.git (push) Addendum 2: It looks as if my local master is configured to push to the remote, but not to pull from it. After doing for remote in 'git branch -r | grep -v master '; do git checkout --track $remote ; done, here's what I have. It seems I just need to get master pulling from remotes/origin/master again, no? $ git remote show origin * remote origin Fetch URL: [email protected]:proj.git Push URL: [email protected]:proj.git HEAD branch: master Remote branches: experiment_f tracked master tracked Local branches configured for 'git pull': experiment_f merges with remote experiment_f Local refs configured for 'git push': experiment_f pushes to experiment_f (up to date) master pushes to master (local out of date)

    Read the article

  • Getting codebaseHQ SVN ChangeLog data in your application

    - by saifkhan
    I deploy apps via ClickOnce. After each deployment we have to review the changes made and send out an email to the users with the changes. What I decided now to do is to use CodebaseHQ’s API to access a project’s SVN repository and display the commit notes so some users who download new updates can check what was changed or updated in an app. This saves a heck of a lot of time, especially when your apps are in beta and you are making several changes daily based on feedback. You can read up on their API here Here is a sample on how to access the Repositories API from a windows app Public Sub GetLog() If String.IsNullOrEmpty(_url) Then Exit Sub Dim answer As String = String.Empty Dim myReq As HttpWebRequest = WebRequest.Create(_url) With myReq .Headers.Add("Authorization", String.Format("Basic {0}", Convert.ToBase64String(Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes("username:password")))) .ContentType = "application/xml" .Accept = "application/xml" .Method = "POST" End With Try Using response As HttpWebResponse = myReq.GetResponse() Using sr As New System.IO.StreamReader(response.GetResponseStream()) answer = sr.ReadToEnd() Dim doc As XDocument = XDocument.Parse(answer) Dim commits = From commit In doc.Descendants("commit") _ Select Message = commit.Element("message").Value, _ AuthorName = commit.Element("author-name").Value, _ AuthoredDate = DateTime.Parse(commit.Element("authored-at").Value).Date grdLogData.BeginUpdate() grdLogData.DataSource = commits.ToList() grdLogData.EndUpdate() End Using End Using Catch ex As Exception MsgBox(ex.Message) End Try End Sub

    Read the article

  • Finish feature reverted commits from develop

    - by marco-fiset
    I am using git as a version control system, and using git-flow as the branching model. I started a feature branch some weeks ago in order to maintain the system in a clean state while developping that feature. The main development continued on the develop branch, and changes from develop were merged periodically into the feature, to keep it up to date as much as possible. However came the time where the feature was finished, and I used git-flow's finish feature to merge the feature back into develop. The merge was successfully done, but then I found out that some of the commits I made in develop were reverted by the merge commit! Nowhere in develop or in the feature branch were these changes reverted, I can't see any commit that overwrote them. I just can't find anything. The only theory I have for the moment is that git is failing on me, but that would be extremely unlikely. Maybe I did some kind of wrong manipulation that made this situation come true? I can trace back in the history when the commit was made. I can see that the changes from that commit were reverted by the merge commit. Nowhere in the branch I see a commit that reverts those changes. Yet they were reverted. How is this even possible?

    Read the article

  • Tracking contributions from contributors not using git

    - by alex.jordan
    I have a central git repo located on a server. I have many contributors that are not tech savvy, do not have server access, and do not know anything about git. But they are able to contribute via the project's web side. Each of them logs on via a web browser and contributes to the project. I have set things up so that when they log on, each user's contributions are made into a cloned repo on the server that is specifically for that user. Periodically, I log on to the server, visit each of their repos, and do a git diff to make sure they haven't done anything bad. If all is well, I commit their changes and push them to the central repo. Of course I need to manually look at their changes so that I can add an appropriate commit message. But I would also like to track who made the changes. I am making the commit, and I (and the web server) are the only users that are actually writing anything to the server. I could track this in the commit messages. While this strikes me as wrong, if this is my only option, is there a way to make userx's cloned repo always include "userx: " before each commit message that I add, so that I do not have to remind myself which user's repo I am in? Or even better, is there an easy way for me to make the commit, but in such a way as I credit the user whose cloned repo I am in?

    Read the article

  • ??GoldenGate Replicat?HANDLECOLLISIONS??

    - by Liu Maclean(???)
    HANDLECOLLISIONS?????goldengate????????REPLICAT??,???????????????????,???????????????????????????,??????????????????????????reperror????????discard??,????????????????,??????(????error mapping????,???????discard??),??????????????;?????????????????,????????? ??HANDLECOLLISIONS?????: target??delete??(missing delete),??????????discardfile target??update??(missing update) ????????=» update???INSERT ,???????????? ?????????=» ??????????discardfile ????????????target??,???replicat???UPDATE?????????????? ??1 target??delete??(missing delete) : C:\Users\ML>sqlplus / as sysdba SQL*Plus: Release 11.2.0.3.0 Production on Tue Sep 18 13:38:03 2012 Copyright (c) 1982, 2011, Oracle. All rights reserved. Connected to: Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options SQL> conn sender/oracle Connected. SQL> create table handlec(t1 int primary key,t2 int); Table created. SQL> insert into handlec values(1,2); 1 row created. SQL> insert into handlec values(3,2); 1 row created. SQL> insert into handlec values(4,2); 1 row created. SQL> commit; Commit complete. SQL> select * from handlec; T1 T2 ---------- ---------- 1 2 3 2 4 2 target : SQL> conn receiver/oracle Connected. SQL> create table handlec(t1 int primary key,t2 int); Table created. SQL> insert into handlec values(1,2); 1 row created. SQL> commit; SQL> select * from handlec; T1 T2 ---------- ---------- 1 2 SQL> GGSCI (XIANGBLI-CN) 1> alter extract load2 , begin now EXTRACT altered. GGSCI (XIANGBLI-CN) 4> alter replicat rep2, begin now REPLICAT altered. GGSCI (XIANGBLI-CN) 13> add trandata sender.* Logging of supplemental redo data enabled for table SENDER.HANDLEC. Logging of supplemental redo log data is already enabled for table SENDER.TV. GGSCI (XIANGBLI-CN) 14> start mgr MGR is already running. GGSCI (XIANGBLI-CN) 15> start er * Sending START request to MANAGER ... EXTRACT LOAD2 starting Sending START request to MANAGER ... REPLICAT REP2 starting GGSCI (XIANGBLI-CN) 16> info all Program Status Group Lag at Chkpt Time Since Chkpt MANAGER RUNNING EXTRACT RUNNING LOAD2 00:00:00 00:00:01 REPLICAT RUNNING REP2 00:00:00 00:00:08 ***SOURCE?????TARGET????? SQL> delete handlec where t1=3; 1 row deleted. SQL> commit; Commit complete. ??SQL error 1403??,REPLICAT ABORT 2012-09-18 13:45:48 WARNING OGG-01004 Aborted grouped transaction on 'RECEIVER.HANDLEC', Database error 1403 (OCI Error ORA-01403: no data found, SQL ). 2012-09-18 13:45:48 WARNING OGG-01003 Repositioning to rba 1091 in seqno 3. 2012-09-18 13:45:48 WARNING OGG-01154 SQL error 1403 mapping SENDER.HANDLEC to RECEIVER.HANDLEC OCI Error ORA-01403: no data found, SQL . 2012-09-18 13:45:48 WARNING OGG-01003 Repositioning to rba 1091 in seqno 3. Source Context : SourceModule : [er.errors] SourceID : [er/errors.cpp] SourceFunction : [take_rep_err_action] SourceLine : [623] ThreadBacktrace : [8] elements : [D:\ogg\V34342-01\gglog.dll(??1CContextItem@@UEAA@XZ+0x3272) [0x000000018010BDD2]] : [D:\ogg\V34342-01\gglog.dll(?_MSG_ERR_MAP_TO_TANDEM_FAILED@@YAPEAVCMessage@@PEAVCSourceContext@@AEBV?$CQualDBObjName@$00@ggapp@gglib@ggs@@1W4MessageDisposition@CMessageFactory@@@Z+0x138) [0x00000001800AD508]] : [D:\ogg\V34342-01\replicat.exe(ERCALLBACK+0x6e1e) [0x0000000140099D5E]] : [D:\ogg\V34342-01\replicat.exe(shutdownMonitoring+0x4411) [0x00000001400C9BE1]] : [D:\ogg\V34342-01\replicat.exe(shutdownMonitoring+0x289cd) [0x00000001400EE19D]] : [D:\ogg\V34342-01\replicat.exe(CommonLexerNewSSD+0x9440) [0x00000001402AE980]] : [C:\windows\system32\kernel32.dll(BaseThreadInitThunk+0xd) [0x000000007733652D]] : [C:\windows\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll(RtlUserThreadStart+0x21) [0x000000007746C521]] 2012-09-18 13:45:48 ERROR OGG-01296 Error mapping from SENDER.HANDLEC to RECEIVER.HANDLEC. *********************************************************************** * ** Run Time Statistics ** * *********************************************************************** Last record for the last committed transaction is the following: ___________________________________________________________________ Trail name : D:\ogg\V34342-01\ex\ze000003 Hdr-Ind : E (x45) Partition : . (x04) UndoFlag : . (x00) BeforeAfter: B (x42) RecLength : 9 (x0009) IO Time : 2012-09-18 13:45:38.000000 IOType : 3 (x03) OrigNode : 255 (xff) TransInd : . (x03) FormatType : R (x52) SyskeyLen : 0 (x00) Incomplete : . (x00) AuditRBA : 44 AuditPos : 3337232 Continued : N (x00) RecCount : 1 (x01) 2012-09-18 13:45:38.000000 Delete Len 9 RBA 1091 Name: SENDER.HANDLEC ___________________________________________________________________ Reading D:\ogg\V34342-01\ex\ze000003, current RBA 1091, 0 records Report at 2012-09-18 13:45:48 (activity since 2012-09-18 13:45:48) From Table SENDER.HANDLEC to RECEIVER.HANDLEC: # inserts: 0 # updates: 0 # deletes: 0 # discards: 1 Last log location read: FILE: D:\ogg\V34342-01\ex\ze000003 SEQNO: 3 RBA: 1091 TIMESTAMP: 2012-09-18 13:45:38.000000 EOF: NO READERR: 0 2012-09-18 13:45:48 ERROR OGG-01668 PROCESS ABENDING. 2012-09-18 13:45:48 INFO OGG-01237 Trace file D:\ogg\V34342-01\REP_TRACE1.TRC closed. 2012-09-18 13:45:48 INFO OGG-01237 Trace file D:\ogg\V34342-01\REP_TRACE2.TRC closed. CACHE OBJECT MANAGER statistics CACHE MANAGER VM USAGE vm current = 0 vm anon queues = 0 vm anon in use = 0 vm file = 0 vm used max = 0 ==> CACHE BALANCED CACHE CONFIGURATION cache size = 2G cache force paging = 3.41G buffer min = 64K buffer highwater = 8M pageout eligible size = 8M ================================================================================ ??skiptransaction???????? GGSCI (XIANGBLI-CN) 18> start rep2 skiptransaction Sending START request to MANAGER ... REPLICAT REP2 starting ??2 target??update??(missing update),???????? : ???????, ??source????????? SQL> update handlec set t1=5 where t1=4; 1 row updated. SQL> commit; Commit complete. ???target ????(miss update)??????? Database error 1403+OGG-01296 2012-09-18 13:49:30 WARNING OGG-01004 Aborted grouped transaction on 'RECEIVER.HANDLEC', Database error 1403 (OCI Error ORA-01403: no data found, SQL <UPDATE "RECEIVER"."HANDLEC" SET "T1" = :a1 WHERE "T1" = :b0>). 2012-09-18 13:49:30 WARNING OGG-01003 Repositioning to rba 1218 in seqno 3. 2012-09-18 13:49:30 WARNING OGG-01003 Repositioning to rba 1218 in seqno 3. Source Context : SourceModule : [er.errors] SourceID : [er/errors.cpp] SourceFunction : [take_rep_err_action] SourceLine : [623] ThreadBacktrace : [8] elements : [D:\ogg\V34342-01\gglog.dll(??1CContextItem@@UEAA@XZ+0x3272) [0x000000018010BDD2]] : [D:\ogg\V34342-01\gglog.dll(?_MSG_ERR_MAP_TO_TANDEM_FAILED@@YAPEAVCMessage@@PEAVCSourceContext@@AEBV?$CQualDBObjName@$00@ggapp@gglib@ggs@@1W4MessageDisposition@CMessageFactory@@@Z+0x138) [0x00000001800AD508]] : [D:\ogg\V34342-01\replicat.exe(ERCALLBACK+0x6e1e) [0x0000000140099D5E]] : [D:\ogg\V34342-01\replicat.exe(shutdownMonitoring+0x4411) [0x00000001400C9BE1]] : [D:\ogg\V34342-01\replicat.exe(shutdownMonitoring+0x289cd) [0x00000001400EE19D]] : [D:\ogg\V34342-01\replicat.exe(CommonLexerNewSSD+0x9440) [0x00000001402AE980]] : [C:\windows\system32\kernel32.dll(BaseThreadInitThunk+0xd) [0x000000007733652D]] : [C:\windows\SYSTEM32\ntdll.dll(RtlUserThreadStart+0x21) [0x000000007746C521]] 2012-09-18 13:49:30 ERROR OGG-01296 Error mapping from SENDER.HANDLEC to RECEIVER.HANDLEC. ??HANDLECOLLISIONS?,rep??????????discard?? GGSCI (XIANGBLI-CN) 23> view params rep2 replicat rep2 userid receiver , password oracle trace ./rep_trace1.trc trace2 ./rep_trace2.trc ASSUMETARGETDEFS HANDLECOLLISIONS map sender.*, target receiver.*; GGSCI (XIANGBLI-CN) 18> start rep2 SQL> select * from handlec; T1 T2 ---------- ---------- 1 2 5 ????T1=5 T2 NULL?????? ,??update?????????????,??replicat??????????????update????????????????,?????T2 ?NULL ,????????????EXTRACT??PKUPDATE??? ????????FETCHOPTIONS FETCHPKUPDATECOLS ????????EXTRACT?????,???EXTRACT? ????extract???????????? ??????: SQL> conn receiver/oracle Connected. SQL> select * from handlec; T1 T2 ---------- ---------- 1 2 10 100 5 20 200 SQL> delete handlec where t1=5; 1 row deleted. SQL> commit; Commit complete. SQL> select * from handlec; T1 T2 ---------- ---------- 1 2 10 100 20 200 SQL> conn sender/oracle Connected. SQL> update handlec set t1=t1+1000 where t1=5; 1 row updated. SQL> commit; Commit complete. SQL> conn receiver/oracle Connected. SQL> SQL> SQL> select * from handlec; T1 T2 ---------- ---------- 1 2 10 100 20 200 1005 2 ???????FETCHOPTIONS FETCHPKUPDATECOLS??????redo image???trail?,????primary key?????HANDLECOLLISIONS????target??????????? ??3 ????????????target??,???replicat???UPDATE??????????????: *** TARGET SQL> conn receiver/oracle Connected. SQL> select * from handlec; T1 T2 ---------- ---------- 1 2 10 9 5 target????? t1=10 t2=9??? ,????source???(10,100)??? >>SOURCE SQL> insert into handlec values(10,100); 1 row created. SQL> commit; >>TARGET SQL> select * from handlec; T1 T2 ---------- ---------- 1 2 10 100 5 ???????source?insert??,???target???????????????HANDLECOLLISIONS?REPLICAT???UPDATE??????COLUMNS ?? HANDLECOLLISIONS?????goldengate????????REPLICAT??,???????????????????,???????????????????????????,??????????????????????????reperror????????discard??,????????????????,??????,??????????????;?????????????????,????????? ??HANDLECOLLISIONS?????: target??delete??(missing delete),??????????discardfile target??update??(missing update) ????????=» update???INSERT ,???????????? ?????????=» ??????????discardfile ????????????target??,???replicat???UPDATE?????????????? ?:???????????Insert/Delete??,????????????????Replicat?????abend,????? ???????????,??target??HANDLECOLLISIONS??update??,?????INSERT??????,???????????????,FETCHOPTIONS FETCHPKUPDATECOLS??????redo image???trail?,????primary key?????HANDLECOLLISIONS????target??????????? ??????send ??????HANDLECOLLISIONS GGSCI (XIANGBLI-CN) 29> send rep2, NOHANDLECOLLISIONS Sending NOHANDLECOLLISIONS request to REPLICAT REP2 ... REP2 NOHANDLECOLLISIONS set for 1 tables and 0 wildcard entries

    Read the article

  • DataForm commit button is not enabled when data changed.

    - by Grayson Mitchell
    This is a weird problem. I am using a dataform, and when I edit the data the save button is enabled, but the cancel button is not. After looking around a bit I have found that I have to implement the IEditableObject in order to cancel an edit. Great I did that (and it all works), but now the commit button (Save) is grayed out, lol. Anyone have any idea's why the commit button will not activate any more? Xaml <df:DataForm x:Name="_dataForm" AutoEdit="False" AutoCommit="False" CommandButtonsVisibility="All"> <df:DataForm.EditTemplate > <DataTemplate> <StackPanel Name="rootPanel" Orientation="Vertical" df:DataField.IsFieldGroup="True"> <!-- No fields here. They will be added at run-time. --> </StackPanel> </DataTemplate> </df:DataForm.EditTemplate> </df:DataForm> binding DataContext = this; _dataForm.ItemsSource = _rows; ... TextBox textBox = new TextBox(); Binding binding = new Binding(); binding.Path = new PropertyPath("Data"); binding.Mode = BindingMode.TwoWay; binding.Converter = new RowIndexConverter(); binding.ConverterParameter = col.Value.Label; textBox.SetBinding(TextBox.TextProperty, binding); dataField.Content = textBox; // add DataField to layout container rootPanel.Children.Add(dataField); Data Class definition public class Row : INotifyPropertyChanged , IEditableObject { public void BeginEdit() { foreach (var item in _data) { _cache.Add(item.Key, item.Value); } } public void CancelEdit() { _data.Clear(); foreach (var item in _cache) { _data.Add(item.Key, item.Value); } _cache.Clear(); } public void EndEdit() { _cache.Clear(); } private Dictionary<string, object> _cache = new Dictionary<string, object>(); private Dictionary<string, object> _data = new Dictionary<string, object>(); public object this[string index] { get { return _data[index]; } set { _data[index] = value; OnPropertyChanged("Data"); } } public object Data { get { return this; } set { PropertyValueChange setter = value as PropertyValueChange; _data[setter.PropertyName] = setter.Value; } } public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged; protected void OnPropertyChanged(string property) { if (PropertyChanged != null) { PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(property)); } } }

    Read the article

  • If it is possible to auto-format code before and after a source control commit, checkout, diff, etc.

    - by dennisjtaylor
    If it is possible to auto-format code before and after a source control commit, checkout, diff, etc. does a company really need a standard code style? It feels like standard coding style debates that have been raging since programming began like "put the bracket on the following line" or "properly indent your (" are no longer essential. I realize in languages where white space matters the diff will have to consider it but for languages where the style is a personal preference is there really a need to worry about it anymore?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22  | Next Page >