Search Results

Search found 7500 results on 300 pages for 'const char'.

Page 15/300 | < Previous Page | 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22  | Next Page >

  • Assign bitset member to char

    - by RedX
    I have some code here that uses bitsets to store many 1 bit values into a char. Basically struct BITS_8 { char _1:1; (...) char _8:1; } Now i was trying to pass one of these bits as a parameter into a function void func(char bit){ if(bit){ // do something }else{ // do something else } // and the call was struct BITS_8 bits; // all bits were set to 0 before bits._7 = 1; bits._8 = 1; func(bits._8); The solution was to single the bit out when calling the function: func(bits._8 & 0x128); But i kept going into //do something because other bits were set. I was wondering if this is the correct behaviour or if my compiler is broken. The compiler is an embedded compiler that produces code for freescale ASICs.

    Read the article

  • char array split ip with strtok

    - by user1480139
    I'm trying to split a IP address like 127.0.0.1 from a file: using following C code: pch2 = strtok (ip,"."); printf("\npart 1 ip: %s",pch2); pch2 = strtok (NULL,"."); printf("\npart 2 ip: %s",pch2); And IP is a char ip[500], that containt an ip. When printing it prints 127 as part 1 but as part 2 it prints NULL? Can someone help me? EDIT: Whole function: FILE *file = fopen ("host.txt", "r"); char * pch; char * pch2; char ip[BUFFSIZE]; IPPart result; if (file != NULL) { char line [BUFFSIZE]; while(fgets(line,sizeof line,file) != NULL) { if(line[0] != '#') { //fputs(line,stdout); pch = strtok (line," "); printf ("%s\n",pch); strncpy(ip, pch, sizeof(pch)-1); ip[sizeof(pch)-1] = '\0'; //pch = strtok (line, " "); pch = strtok (NULL," "); printf("%s",pch); pch2 = strtok (ip,"."); printf("\nDeel 1 ip: %s",pch2); pch2 = strtok (NULL,"."); printf("\nDeel 2 ip: %s",pch2); //if(strcmp(pch,url) == 0) //{ // result.part1 = //} } } fclose(file); }

    Read the article

  • how to access char*** from dll import in C#

    - by mavrick
    I have a function in win32 dll with signature as: void func1(int a, char*** outData) int a -- input parameter char*** outData -- output parameter - pointer to array of char strings Any idea how to access this in C# using dll import & what should be the signature.

    Read the article

  • c++: at what point should I start using "new char[N]" vs a static buffer "char[Nmax]"

    - by dan
    My question is with regard to C++ Suppose I write a function to return a list of items to the caller. Each item has 2 logical fields: 1) an int ID, and 2) some data whose size may vary, let's say from 4 bytes up to 16Kbytes. So my question is whether to use a data structure like: struct item { int field1; char field2[MAX_LEN]; OR, rather, to allocate field2 from the heap, and require the caller to destroy when he's done: struct item{ int field1; char *field2; // new char[N] -- destroy[] when done! Since the max size of field #2 is large, is makes sense that this would be allocated from the heap, right? So once I know the size N, I call field2 = new char[N], and populate it. Now, is this horribly inefficient? Is it worse in cases where N is always small, i.e. suppose I have 10000 items that have N=4?

    Read the article

  • .inputrc settings: delete-char and [] keybindings not working

    - by tanascius
    Hello, I am using mingw under windows. When I am using ruby (irb) my 'special' characters like []{} and \ are not working. This is because of my german keyboard, where these keys are used together with AltGr (Alt + Ctrl). I found a solution for this here or here. Now, when I add the line "\M-[": "[" to my .inputrc file the delete-key no longer works. It is defined as usual: "\e[3~": delete-char Pressing delete just returns [3, while Ctrl + v, delete returns ^[[3~ as expected. Somehow these two definitions in .inputrc do not work together. Any ideas? EDIT: It is only the delete key that is not working, my other bindings all work, like: "\e[1~": beginning-of-line # home (ok) "\e[2~": paste-from-clipboard # insert (ok) "\e[3~": delete-char # delete (PROBLEM) "\e[4~": end-of-line # end (ok) "\e[5~": history-search-backward # pageup (ok) "\e[6~": history-search-forward # pagedown (ok)

    Read the article

  • Lifetime of a const string literal returned by a function

    - by Neeraj
    Consider this code: const char* someFun() { // ... some stuff return "Some text!!" } int main() { { // Block: A const char* retStr = someFun(); // use retStr } } My question is in the function sumFun() where is "some Text!!", stored (i think may be in some static area in ROM) and what will be its scope? Will the memory pointed by retStr be occupied throughout the program or be released once the block A exits? -- Thanks

    Read the article

  • Difference of function argument as (const int &) and (int & a) in C++

    - by Narek
    I know that if you write void function_name(int& a), then function will not do local copy of your variable passed as argument. Also have met in literature that you should write void function_name(const int & a) in order to say compiler, that I dont want the variable passed as argument to be copied. So my question: what is the difference with this two cases (except that "const" enshures that the variable passes will not be changed by function!!!)???

    Read the article

  • Get Const / Static Name from Function / Method Call.

    - by Mark Tomlin
    I want to find the token's name passed by augment into a function. class Norm { const STR_NORM = 0; const INT_NORM = 0; } function foo($Arg1, $Arg2 = NULL) { getConstName($Arg1); # Should Return STR_NORM; return $Arg1, $Arg2; } echo foo(Norm::STR_NORM); Is there any way to impalement getConstName via the PHP Reflection API?

    Read the article

  • initialize a const array in a class initializer in C++

    - by Nathan Fellman
    I have the following class in C++: class a { const int b[2]; // other stuff follows // and here's the constructor a(void); } The question is, how do I initialize b in the initialization list, given that I can't initialize it inside the body of the function of the constructor, because b is const? This doesn't work: a::a(void) : b([2,3]) { // other initialization stuff } Edit: The case in point is when I can have different values for b for different instances, but the values are known to be constant for the lifetime of the instance.

    Read the article

  • Use of const in a method

    - by kouPhax
    In the following method, public void InspectList(IList<int> values) { if(values != null) { const string format = "Element At {0}"; foreach(int i in values) { Log(string.Format(format, i)); } } } Does the use of const provide any benefit over just declaring the string as a string? Woudl it not be interned anyway?

    Read the article

  • Are 'const' variables precomputed by default in C++?

    - by Gunnar
    Suppose I have variables for positions like const float latitude = 51.+11./60.+33.0461/3600.; const float longitude = 12.+50./60.+31.9369/3600.; and use them frequently in the program. Does the compiler precompute that? (This example should not produce much overhead, but you get the point.) Bonus point for pointing out location. ;) TIA

    Read the article

  • Scope of const char*

    - by Neeraj
    Consider this code: const char* someFun() { // ... some stuff return "Some text!!" } int main() { { // Block: A const char* retStr = someFun(); // use retStr } } My question is in the function sumFun() where is "some Text!!", stored (i think may be in some static area in ROM) and what will be its scope? Will the memory pointed by retStr be occupied throughout the program or be released once the block A exits? -- Thanks

    Read the article

  • Find out number of fraction digits in currency in iOS

    - by thejaz
    I use NSNumberFormatter to format currencies in a localized way, and it works fine. But I want to override this and give the user the option to override the number of digits after the decimal separator. How can I find out the number of digits the NSNumberFormatter will use for a certain currency? I have looked in the NSLocale object, but none of the keys tell me this. NSString * const NSLocaleIdentifier; NSString * const NSLocaleLanguageCode; NSString * const NSLocaleCountryCode; NSString * const NSLocaleScriptCode; NSString * const NSLocaleVariantCode; NSString * const NSLocaleExemplarCharacterSet; NSString * const NSLocaleCalendar; NSString * const NSLocaleCollationIdentifier; NSString * const NSLocaleUsesMetricSystem; NSString * const NSLocaleMeasurementSystem; NSString * const NSLocaleDecimalSeparator; NSString * const NSLocaleGroupingSeparator; NSString * const NSLocaleCurrencySymbol; NSString * const NSLocaleCurrencyCode; NSString * const NSLocaleCollatorIdentifier; NSString * const NSLocaleQuotationBeginDelimiterKey; NSString * const NSLocaleQuotationEndDelimiterKey; NSString * const NSLocaleAlternateQuotationBeginDelimiterKey; NSString * const NSLocaleAlternateQuotationEndDelimiterKey; How can I find out the correct number of decimals for a currency like the NSNumberFormatter seems to know?

    Read the article

  • OpenAL causing leaks in my iPhone game. Help appreciated

    - by AptoTech
    Hi, I am integrating OpenAL in my iPhone game from code I found in this post, but the compiler gave me an error on this line of code: unsigned char *outData = malloc(fileSize);, so I changed it to this: unsigned char *outData = (unsigned char*) malloc(fileSize);. This got rid of the compiler errors, but seems to have thrown up two leaks: Malloc 32 Bytes 0x505cb40 AudioToolbox SimAggregateDevice::CreateAggregateDevice(__CFString const*, __CFString const*, unsigned long&) and NSCFDictionary 0x505be30 64 AudioToolbox SimAggregateDevice::CreateAggregateDevice(__CFString const*, __CFString const*, unsigned long&) Is this due to me changing the unsigned char line? I would be very grateful if someone could help me to remove these leaks.

    Read the article

  • c++ new & delete and string & functions

    - by Newbie
    Okay the previous question was answered clearly, but i found out another problem. What if i do: char *test(int ran){ char *ret = new char[ran]; // process... return ret; } And then run it: for(int i = 0; i < 100000000; i++){ string str = test(rand()%10000000+10000000); // process... // no need to delete str anymore? string destructor does it for me here? } So after converting the char* to string, i dont have to worry about the deleting anymore?

    Read the article

  • I just can't figure out strcat.

    - by Anonymous
    I know I shouldn't be using that function, and I don't care. Last time I checked the spec for strcat, it said something along the lines of updating the first value as well as returning the same. Now, this is a really stupid question, and I want you to explain it like you're talking to a really stupid person. Why won't this work? char* foo="foo"; printf(strcat(foo,"bar")); EDIT: I don't know the difference between char[] and char*. How would I allocate a string of 255 characters? EDIT 2: OK, OK, so char[number] allocates a string of that many bytes? Makes sense. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Converting a string into a double

    - by Koning Baard
    I am trying to convert a string (const char* argv[]) to a double precision floating point number: int main(const int argc, const char *argv[]) { int i; double numbers[argc - 1]; for(i = 1; i < argc; i += 1) { /* -- Convert each argv into a double and put it in `number` */ } /* ... */ return 0; } Can anyone help me? Thanks

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22  | Next Page >