Search Results

Search found 44090 results on 1764 pages for 'working conditions'.

Page 15/1764 | < Previous Page | 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22  | Next Page >

  • R - removing rows and replacing values using conditions from multiple columns

    - by lecodesportif
    I want to filter out all values of var3 < 5 while keeping at least one occurrence of each value of var1. > foo <- data.frame(var1= c(1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5), var2=c(9, 5, 13, 9, 12, 11, 13, 9), var3=c(6, 8, 3, 6, 4, 7, 2, 9)) > foo var1 var2 var3 1 1 9 6 2 1 5 8 3 2 13 3 4 3 9 6 5 3 12 4 6 4 11 7 7 4 13 2 8 5 9 9 subset(foo, (foo$var3>=5)) would remove row 3, 5 and 7 and I would have lost var1==2. I want to remove the row if there is another value of var1 that fulfills the condition foo$var3 = 5. See row 5. I want to keep the row, assiging NA to var2 and var3 if all occurrences of a value var1 do not fulfill the condition foo$var3 = 5. This is the result I expect: var1 var2 var3 1 1 9 6 2 1 5 8 3 2 NA NA 4 3 9 6 6 4 11 7 8 5 9 9 This is the closest I got: > foo$var3[ foo$var3 < 5 ] = NA > foo$var2[ is.na(foo$var3) ] = NA > foo var1 var2 var3 1 1 9 6 2 1 5 8 3 2 NA NA 4 3 9 6 5 3 NA NA 6 4 11 7 7 4 NA NA 8 5 9 9 So I guess I just need to know how to conditionally remove the row.

    Read the article

  • Get data on the basis of conditions in entity framework 3.5 with include

    - by Ashwani K
    Hello All: I am using entity framework 3.5 for my application. I want load data based on some condition e.g. var data = from e in context.Employee.Include("Employee.Projects") where e.IsActive select e; Using this, I will get all the Employees which are active with their project details. But I want to load only those projects which are active. So, how to load only active projects using the query? Thanks Ashwani

    Read the article

  • C++ infix to postfix conversion for logical conditions

    - by Gopalakrishnan Subramani
    I want to evaluate one expression in C++. To evaluate it, I want the expression to be converted to prefix format. Here is an example wstring expression = "Feature1 And Feature2"; Here are possible ways. expression = "Feature1 And (Feature2 Or Feature3)"; expression = "Not Feature1 Or Feature3"; Here And, Or, Not are reserved words and parentheses ("(", )) are used for scope Not has higher precedence And is set next precedence to Not Or is set to next precedence to And WHITE SPACE used for delimiter. Expression has no other elements like TAB, NEWLINE I don't need arithmetic expressions. I can do the evaluation but can somebody help me to convert the strings to prefix notation?

    Read the article

  • Core Data: Multiple conditions inside relational aggregate operations

    - by Uzaak
    I have an SQLite table used by Core Data with the following elements: Name: John LastName: Foobar Age: 23 Name: Bob LastName: Baz Age: 37 Name: Peter LastName: Fooqux Age: 32 Name: John LastName: Bar Age: 29 Those are all in a to-many relationship from another object "Company". I need to query the database and retrieve all Company objects with employees called "John" but whose last name does NOT contain "Foo". I did go as far as to make the following predicate: [NSPredicate predicateWithFormat:@"ANY employee.name = 'John'"]; How do I get to filter only by companies whose Johns don't have "Foo" in their last names?

    Read the article

  • Multiple inequality conditions (range queries) in NoSQL

    - by pableu
    Hi, I have an application where I'd like to use a NoSQL database, but I still want to do range queries over two different properties, for example select all entries between times T1 and T2 where the noiselevel is smaller than X. On the other hand, I would like to use a NoSQL/Key-Value store because my data is very sparse and diverse, and I do not want to create new tables for every new datatype that I might come across. I know that you cannot use multiple inequality filters for the Google Datastore (source). I also know that this feature is coming (according to this). I know that this is also not possible in CouchDB (source). I think I also more or less understand why this is the case. Now, this makes me wonder.. Is that the case with all NoSQL databases? Can other NoSQL systems make range queries over two different properties? How about, for example, Mongo DB? I've looked in the Documentation, but the only thing I've found was the following snippet in their docu: Note that any of the operators on this page can be combined in the same query document. For example, to find all document where j is not equal to 3 and k is greater than 10, you'd query like so: db.things.find({j: {$ne: 3}, k: {$gt: 10} }); So they use greater-than and not-equal on two different properties. They don't say anything about two inequalities ;-) Any input and enlightenment is welcome :-)

    Read the article

  • two where conditions in a mysql query

    - by Kaartz
    I have a table like below |date|dom|guid|pid|errors|QA|comm| |2010-03-22|xxxx.com|jsd3j234j|ab|Yes|xxxxxx|bad| |2010-03-22|xxxx.com|jsd3j234j|ab|No|xxxxxx|| |2010-03-22|xxxx.com|jsd3j234j|if|Yes|xxxxxx|bad| |2010-03-22|xxxx.com|jsd3j234j|if|No|xxxxxx|| |2010-03-22|xxxx.com|jsd3j234j|he|Yes|xxxxxx|bad| |2010-03-22|xxxx.com|jsd3j234j|he|No|xxxxxx|| I want to retrieve the total count of "dom" referred to each "QA" and also I need the count of "errors" detected by the "QA" SELECT date, count(dom), QA FROM reports WHERE date="2010-03-22" GROUP BY QA |2010-03-22|2|ab| |2010-03-22|2|if| |2010-03-22|2|he| SELECT date, count(dom), count(errors), QA FROM reports WHERE errors="Yes" GROUP BY QA |2010-03-22|1|ab| |2010-03-22|1|if| |2010-03-22|1|he| I want to combine the above two queries, is it possible. If I use the below query, I am not getting the desired result. SELECT date, count(dom), QA, count(errors) FROM reports WHERE date="2010-03-22" AND errors="Yes" GROUP BY QA I want the below output |2010-03-22|2|ab|1| |2010-03-22|2|if|1| |2010-03-22|2|he|1| Please help me.

    Read the article

  • Performance with timestamp conditions

    - by Tim Whitlock
    Which of the following is faster, or are they equivalent? (grabbing recent most records from a TIMESTAMP COLUMN) SELECT UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`modified`) stamp FROM `some_table` HAVING stamp > 127068799 ORDER BY stamp DESC or SELECT UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`modified`) stamp FROM `some_table` WHERE UNIX_TIMESTAMP(`modified`) > 127068799 ORDER BY `modified` DESC or even another combination?

    Read the article

  • Aspect Oriented Programming vs List<IAction> To execute methods based on conditions

    - by David Robbins
    I'm new to AOP so bear with me. Consider the following scenario: A state machine is used in a workflow engine, and after the state of the application is changed, a series of commands are executed. Depending on the state, different types of commands should be executed. As I see it, one implementation is to create List<IAction> and have each individual action determine whether it should execute. Would a Aspect Oriented process work as well? That is, could you create an aspect that notifies a class when a property changes, and execute the appropriate processes from that class? Would this help centralize the state specific rules?

    Read the article

  • Preventing Race Conditions

    - by Qua
    I'm using the built-in ajax functionality of MVC2. Basically the user types a search query, and on every key press a set of results for the query is shown. This works fine in almost all cases, but sometimes the server is a bit slow with a single response, and thus the result for the next key stroke is returned before the previous. When the previous key stroke result set is finally returned to the client it will overwrite the results for the newer search query that should actually have been shown. My code follows more or less along these lines: <% using (Ajax.BeginForm("SearchUser", null, new AjaxOptions() { UpdateTargetId = "findUserResults" }, new { id = "findUserAjaxForm" })) {%> Every keystroke submits this form and thus outputs the results in the 'findUserResults' element. How can I prevent older results from being displayed while still making use of the built-in functions provided in MVC2?

    Read the article

  • C#: How to gracefully pass multiple conditions to Equals()

    - by Roy
    I'm new to C#, and I'm trying to write a program that selects file types from a FileInfo list. So far I have something along the lines of: List<FileInfo> files = new List<FileInfo>(); IEnumerable<FileInfo> result = files.Where(f=>f.Extension.Equals(".jpg", StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase)|| f.Extension.Equals(".gif", StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase) ); etc Obviously I'm not happy with this solution, but I don't know how to do this otherwise in a single call. What's the better way to go about it?

    Read the article

  • Multiple conditions on select query

    - by stats101
    I have a select statement and I wish to calculate the cubic volume based on other values within the table. However I want to check that neither pr.Length_mm or pr.Width_mm or pr.Height_mm are NULL prior. I've looked at CASE statements, however it only seems to evaluate one column at a time. SELECT sa.OrderName, sa.OrderType, pr.Volume_UOM ,pr.Length_mm*pr.Width_mm*pr.Height_mm AS Volume_Cubic ,pr.Length_mm*pr.Width_mm AS Volume_Floor ,pr.Length_mm ,pr.Height_mm ,pr.Width_mm FROM CostToServe_MCB.staging.Sale sa LEFT JOIN staging.Product pr ON sa.ID = pr.ID

    Read the article

  • Questions on using enums as parameters and if/else conditions

    - by dotnetdev
    Hi, Is it possible to do the following with an enum in C#?: Pass in to a method a selected value of the enum (eg if an enum has members such as Red, Green, Orange, I can pass in Colors.Red). In the method body of the above method which accepts an enum, I can say if (Enum == Colors.Red). What would be the syntax for this? I've always seemed to have stalled on this.

    Read the article

  • htaccess redirect conditions

    - by user271619
    I figured out how to redirect someone, if they happen across one particular filename: Redirect /index.php http://www.website.com/#myaccount As you can see, I'm pretty much redirecting that visitor to the same page, which doesn't work. It's an endless look, regardless of the slight/minuscule change. I want to force someone to see a part of the page, by adding the hash. (it's a little weird, I know) I'm guessing this may be a time to use regex in the htaccess file. But I thought I'd ask if there's a simpler way to do this from the htaccess file.

    Read the article

  • generate an array from an array with conditions

    - by Aman
    Suppose i have an array $x = (31,12,13,25,18,10); I want to reduce this array in such a way that the value of each array element is 32. so after work my array will become $newx = (32,32,32,13); I have to generate this array in such a way the sum of array values is never greater than 32. so to create first value, i will reduce 1 from second index value i.e. 12, so the second value will become 11 and first index value will become 31+1 =32. This process should continue so that each array value becomes equal to 32.

    Read the article

  • In PHP + MySQL, How do I join many tables with conditions

    - by Moe
    Hi, I'm trying to get the users full activity throughout the website. I need to Join many tables throughout the database, with that condition that it is one user. What I currently have written is: SELECT * FROM comments AS c JOIN rphotos AS r ON c.userID = r.userID AND c.userID = '$defineUserID'; But What it is returning is everything about the user, but it repeats rows. For instance, for one user he has 6 photos and 5 comments So I expect the join to return 11 rows. Instead it returns 30 results like so: PhotoID = 1; CommentID = 1; PhotoID = 1; CommentID = 2; PhotoID = 1; CommentID = 3; and so on... What am i doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • How to enforce lazy loading of entities on certain conditions

    - by Samuel
    We have an JPA @Entity class (say User) which has a @ManyToOne reference (say Address) loaded using the EAGER option which in turn loads it's own @ManyToOne fields (say Country) in a EAGER fashion. We use the EntityQuery interface to count the list of User's based on a search criteria, during such a load all the @ManyToOne fields which have been marked as EAGER get loaded. But in order to perform a EntityQuery.resultCount(), I actually don't need to load the @ManyToOne fields. Is there a way to prevent loading of the EAGER fields in such cases so that we can avoid the unnecessary joins?

    Read the article

  • How to select rows from data.frame with 2 conditions

    - by Peter Smit
    I have an aggregated table: > aggdata[1:4,] Group.1 Group.2 x 1 4 0.05 0.9214660 2 6 0.05 0.9315789 3 8 0.05 0.9526316 4 10 0.05 0.9684211 How can I select the x value when I have values for Group.1 and Group.2? I tried: aggdata[aggdata[,"Group.1"]==l && aggdata[,"Group.2"]==lamda,"x"] but that replies all x's. More info: I want to use this like this: table = data.frame(); for(l in unique(aggdata[,"Group.1"])) { for(lambda in unique(aggdata[,"Group.2"])) { table[l,lambda] = aggdata[aggdata[,"Group.1"]==l & aggdata[,"Group.2"]==lambda,"x"] } } Any suggestions that are even easier and giving this result I appreciate!

    Read the article

  • Combining 2 Mysql update statments(same col, different values, different conditions)

    - by Paul Atkins
    Hi guys, I have been doing some searching but have not been able to find an answer for this so thought I would ask here as the people here know everything :) I am trying to combine these 2 update queries into one query. UPDATE addresses SET is_default='0' WHERE id!='1' UPDATE addresses SET is_default='1' WHERE id='1' I assume this should be too hard to accomplish but i cant seem to work it out :( Thanks Paul

    Read the article

  • has_many conditions or proc on foreign key

    - by ere
    I have a has_many association between two models using a date as both the foreign and primary key for each model. It works perfectly one way but not the other. Works has_one :quiz_log, :primary_key => :start_at, :foreign_key => :start_at Doesn't work has_many :event_logs, :primary_key => :start_at, :foreign_key => :start_at The reason being (i think) because the start_at on QuizLog is a date and the start_at on EventLog is a datetime. So it returns nil trying to match the exact datetime on a simple date. How can I cast the foreign_key start_at on the second statement to convert it first from datetime to simply date so it will match the second model?

    Read the article

  • Codeigniter setting multiple where conditions, how to unset one

    - by Dustin
    I've got a script that is a notify_url from paypal that is supposed to update multiple tables in my database using the following code: //update first table $this-db-where('someid', $somid); $this-db-update('table', $data); ///update second table $this-db-where('somesecondid', $somesecondid) $this-db-update('anothertable', $data2); Then I get the following error: Unknown column 'somesecondid' in 'where clause' UPDATE anothertable SET avail = 0 WHERE someid = '13' AND somesecondid = '199' So codeigniter is combining those where clauses into a single query. Is there a way to unset the first one so it only has "UPDATE anothertable SET avail=0 WHERE somesecondid = 199" ? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • iOS UITableViewCell UIImageView setting on different conditions

    - by chis54
    I have an app that has a UITableView and in my Cells I have UIImageViews and UILabels that change images/textColors for a day theme and a night theme (trying to be automatically set). My issue is that I set the images and colors when the table is populated with cellForRowAtIndexPath and its during the day "theme", then if I reopen the app hours later in the night "theme" and the app is still in the "background" and not needing to be reloaded (ie viewDidLoad doesn't fire), the day "theme" shows until I scroll the UITableView and then the night "theme" shows when new cells are brought into view by scrolling. How should I set the objects in my cells when changing around time of the day? I was thinking to use an NSTimer, but I'm not sure how to update the objects in my cells. I was also thinking about using the appropriate methods in the AppDelagate to set things in motion, but is there a way to force reloading the TableView? Any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • SQL Standard Regarding Left Outer Join and Where Conditions

    - by Ryan
    I am getting different results based on a filter condition in a query based on where I place the filter condition. My questions are: Is there a technical difference between these queries? Is there anything in the SQL standard that explains the different resultsets in the queries? Given the simplified scenario: --Table: Parent Columns: ID, Name, Description --Table: Child Columns: ID, ParentID, Name, Description --Query 1 SELECT p.ID, p.Name, p.Description, c.ID, c.Name, c.Description FROM Parent p LEFT OUTER JOIN Child c ON (p.ID = c.ParentID) WHERE c.ID IS NULL OR c.Description = 'FilterCondition' --Query 2 SELECT p.ID, p.Name, p.Description, c.ID, c.Name, c.Description FROM Parent p LEFT OUTER JOIN Child c ON (p.ID = c.ParentID AND c.Description = 'FilterCondition') I assumed the queries would return the same resultsets and I was surprised when they didn't. I am using MS SQL2005 and in the actual queries, query 1 returned ~700 rows and query 2 returned ~1100 rows and I couldn't detect a pattern on which rows were returned and which rows were excluded. There were still many rows in query 1 with child rows with data and NULL data. I prefer the style of query 2 (and I think it is more optimal), but I thought the queries would return the same results.

    Read the article

  • How to SUM columns on multiple conditions in a GROUP BY

    - by David Liddle
    I am trying to return a list of Accounts with their Balances, Outcome and Income Account Transaction ------- ----------- AccountID TransactionID BankName AccountID Locale Amount Status Here is what I currently have. Could someone explain where I am going wrong? select a.ACCOUNT_ID, a.BANK_NAME, a.LOCALE, a.STATUS, sum(t1.AMOUNT) as BALANCE, sum(t2.AMOUNT) as OUTCOME, sum(t3.AMOUNT) as INCOME from ACCOUNT a left join TRANSACTION t1 on t1.ACCOUNT_ID = a.ACCOUNT_ID left join TRANSACTION t2 on t1.ACCOUNT_ID = a.ACCOUNT_ID and t2.AMOUNT < 0 left join TRANSACTION t3 on t3.ACCOUNT_ID = a.ACCOUNT_ID and t3.AMOUNT > 0 group by a.ACCOUNT_ID, a.BANK_NAME, a.LOCALE, a.[STATUS]

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22  | Next Page >