Search Results

Search found 16731 results on 670 pages for 'memory limit'.

Page 157/670 | < Previous Page | 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164  | Next Page >

  • how to allocate memory for struct itself, and its members

    - by Jack
    I have this struct: struct foo { char *a; char *b; char *c; char *d; }; it's possible allocate space for struct itself and its members instead of e.g, struct foo f; f.a = malloc(); f.b = malloc(); f.c = malloc(); f.d = malloc(); strcpy(f.a, "a"); strcpy(f.b, "b"); //.. something like this(of couse that it doesn't works): struct foo f = malloc(sizeof(struct f)); strpcy(f.a, "a"); //etc

    Read the article

  • Memory error, access violation.

    - by Ordo
    Hello! I'm learning C on my own and as a exercise i have written a program but it does not work. The program is splitted into 3 parts. A header file, a main file for executing the program a file to define the functions. I'm not using all the functions yet but that shouldn't be the problem. Here is my header file, nothing special in it. #ifndef EMPLOYEE_H #define EMPLOYEE_H struct Employee { char first[21]; char last[21]; char title[21]; int salary; }; struct Employee* createEmployee(char*, char*, char*, int); // Creates a struct Employee object on the heap. char* getfirstname (struct Employee*); char* getlastname (struct Employee*); char* gettitle (struct Employee*); int getsalary (struct Employee*); void setfirstname (struct Employee*, char*); void setlastname (struct Employee*, char*); void settitle (struct Employee*, char*); void setsalary (struct Employee*, int); void printEmployee(struct Employee*); #endif In this file i define the functions and how they work: #include "7.1.h" #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> struct Employee* createEmployee(char* first, char* last, char* title, int salary) // Creates a struct Employee object on the heap. { struct Employee* p = (struct Employee*) malloc(sizeof(struct Employee)); if (p != NULL) { strcpy(p->first, first); strcpy(p->last, last); strcpy(p->title, title); p->salary, salary; } return p; } char* getfirstname (struct Employee* p) { if (p != NULL) return p ? p->first : ""; } char* getlastname (struct Employee* p) { if (p != NULL) return p ? p->last : ""; } char* gettitle (struct Employee* p) { if (p != NULL) return p ? p->title : ""; } int getsalary (struct Employee* p) { if (p != NULL) return p ? p->salary : 0; } void setfirstname (struct Employee* p, char* first) { if (p != NULL) strcpy(p->first, first); } void setlastname (struct Employee* p, char* last) { if (p != NULL) strcpy(p->last, last); } void settitle (struct Employee* p, char* title) { if (p != NULL) strcpy(p->title, title); } void setsalary (struct Employee* p, char* salary) { if (p != NULL) p->salary, salary; } void printEmployee(struct Employee* p) { if (p != NULL) { printf("%s, %s, %s, %d", p->first, p->last, p->salary, p->salary ); } } And the last file is used to executed the program/functions: #include "7.1.h" #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> int main () { char decision; struct Employee emp; struct Employee* emps[3]; for ( int i = 0; i < 1; i ++) { printf("Please type in the emplooyes data.\nFirstname:"); scanf("%s", emp.first); printf("Lastname:"); scanf("%s", emp.last); printf("Title:"); scanf("%s", emp.title); printf("Salary:"); scanf("%d", &emp.salary); emps[i] = createEmployee(emp.first, emp.last, emp.title, emp.salary); } printf("Do you want to print out your information? (Y/N):"); scanf("%c", &decision); if (decision == 'y' || decision == 'Y') { printEmployee(emps[1]); } } I don't know what the problem is. I 'm always getting the following error message after typing in first, last, title and salary for the first time. The error is written in german. It means: Unhandled exception at 0x102de42e (msvcr100d.dll) in 7.1.exe: 0xC0000005: Access violation when writing to 0xCCCCCCCC position. I could fix the first problem with the hints given below. Now when i want to print out the employee data using the function:printEmployee(emps[1]);, I get the same kind of error with access violation.

    Read the article

  • Freeing memory with Pointer Arithmetic

    - by Breedly
    C++ newb here. I'm trying to write my own implementation of an array using only pointers, and I've hit a wall I don't know how to get over. My constructor throws this error array.cpp:40:35: error: invalid conversion from ‘int*’ to ‘int’ [-fpermissive] When my array initializes I want it to free up all the spaces in the array for ints. Array::Array(int theSize){ size = theSize; int *arrayPointer = new int; int index = 0; while(theSize > index){ *(arrayPointer + index) = new int; //This is the trouble line. ++index; } } What am I doing wrong stackoverflow?

    Read the article

  • Why does MS-DOS tells me I need extended memory and thinks a file is read-only? [closed]

    - by Jake Inc.
    I am running a .COM file on a MS-DOS 6.22 boot USB drive When I run it on my laptop the program works fine but when I run it on my desktop I get error 40 not enough extended memory. When I go to the memory tab in GUI I try to switch none to auto, but I get the error "This file might be read-only". It's not read-only, when I put it on my desktop I change the settings and the new settings are in a .pif I can't run .pif in MS-DOs so I need to Change the .exe not create a .pif. Change the amount of extended memory all files have on my MS-DOS. On my laptop there is no memory tab, the only real difference is my laptop is x64. Thanks for helping but I think teh x64 bit has nothing to do with it I dont eve nthink iits in 64 bit mode because Im using a boot USB. What i need to is listed above, thanks for helping.

    Read the article

  • Same memory space being allocated again & again while using malloc()

    - by shadyabhi
    In each loop iteration, variable j is declared again and again. Then why is its address remaining same? Shouldn't it be given some random address each time? Is this compiler dependent? #include<stdio.h> #include<malloc.h> int main() { int i=3; while (i--) { int j; printf("%p\n", &j); } return 0; } Testrun:- shadyabhi@shadyabhi-desktop:~/c$ gcc test.c shadyabhi@shadyabhi-desktop:~/c$ ./a.out 0x7fffc0b8e138 0x7fffc0b8e138 0x7fffc0b8e138 shadyabhi@shadyabhi-desktop:~/c$

    Read the article

  • WPF databind in memory image to Image control

    - by Ready Cent
    I am using a DataGrid and trying to do the following Databinding <DataTemplate> <Grid> <Image> <Image.Source> <BitmapImage UriSource="{Binding Data.CustomImage}" CacheOption="OnLoad" /> </Image.Source> </Image> </Grid> </DataTemplate> CustomImage is of type BitmapImage. When I run I get the error: Initialization of 'System.Windows.Media.Imaging.BitmapImage' threw an exception. The thing is that these images are stored as resources in a different assembly so I can't just point to a location on disk

    Read the article

  • cuda 5.0 namespaces for contant memory variable usage

    - by Psypher
    In my program I want to use a structure containing constant variables and keep it on device all long as the program executes to completion. I have several header files containing the declaration of 'global' functions and their respective '.cu' files for their definitions. I kept this scheme because it helps me contain similar code in one place. e.g. all the 'device' functions required to complete 'KERNEL_1' are separated from those 'device' functions required to complete 'KERNEL_2' along with kernels definitions. I had no problems with this scheme during compilation and linking. Until I encountered constant variables. I want to use the same constant variable through all kernels and device functions but it doesn't seem to work. ########################################################################## CODE EXAMPLE ########################################################################### filename: 'common.h' -------------------------------------------------------------------------- typedef struct { double height; double weight; int age; } __CONSTANTS; __constant__ __CONSTANTS d_const; --------------------------------------------------------------------------- filename: main.cu --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #include "common.h" #include "gpukernels.h" int main(int argc, char **argv) { __CONSTANTS T; T.height = 1.79; T.weight = 73.2; T.age = 26; cudaMemcpyToSymbol(d_consts, &T, sizeof(__CONSTANTS)); test_kernel <<< 1, 16 >>>(); cudaDeviceSynchronize(); } --------------------------------------------------------------------------- filename: gpukernels.h --------------------------------------------------------------------------- __global__ void test_kernel(); --------------------------------------------------------------------------- filename: gpukernels.cu --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #include <stdio.h> #include "gpukernels.h" #include "common.h" __global__ void test_kernel() { printf("Id: %d, height: %f, weight: %f\n", threadIdx.x, d_const.height, d_const.weight); } When I execute this code, the kernel executes, displays the thread ids, but the constant values are displayed as zeros. How can I fix this?

    Read the article

  • Same memory space being allocated again & again

    - by shadyabhi
    In each loop iteration, variable j is declared again and again. Then why is its address remaining same? Shouldn't it be given some random address each time? Is this compiler dependent? #include<stdio.h> #include<malloc.h> int main() { int i=3; while (i--) { int j; printf("%p\n", &j); } return 0; } Testrun:- shadyabhi@shadyabhi-desktop:~/c$ gcc test.c shadyabhi@shadyabhi-desktop:~/c$ ./a.out 0x7fffc0b8e138 0x7fffc0b8e138 0x7fffc0b8e138 shadyabhi@shadyabhi-desktop:~/c$

    Read the article

  • c++ macros with memory?

    - by anon
    Is it possible to define macros write_foo(A); and read_foo(); so that: WRITE_FOO(hello); code_block_1; READ_FOO(); code_block_2; READ_FOO(); WRITE_FOO(world); code_block_3; READ_FOO(); code_block_4; READ_FOO(); expands into: code_block_1; hello; code_block_2; hello; code_boock_3; world; code_block_4; world; ? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • A nuts and bolts reference to C# performance and memory use

    - by phil
    I wonder if anyone could point me in the direction where I can read about the nuts and bolts of C#. What I'm interested in learning are method call costs, what it costs to create objects and such. My aim of learning this is to get a better understanding of how increase the performance of an application and get a better understanding of how the C# language works. The reference should preferable be a book, a book that I can read cover to cover.

    Read the article

  • Set argument pointer to point to new memory inside a function (without returning it) IN C

    - by user321605
    Hello, Hopefully my title was descriptive enough to attract the right help. I want to write a function that will return 1 thing, and modify a provided pointer in another. My current function declaration is . . . char * afterURL replaceURLS(char * body) What I want to do is copy all of body's data into a new string, and set body to point to this new data. I then want afterURL to point to a location within the new string. My issue is getting the actual pointer that is passed in to this function to point to the new data. Thanks in advance! Rob

    Read the article

  • memory management: am i doing something wrong here?

    - by z s
    Hi, In a very small number of cases in my iphone app, I get a crash after the for loop in the code below: ABAddressBookRef addressBookInit = ABAddressBookCreate(); CFMutableArrayRef abContacts = (CFMutableArrayRef)ABAddressBookCopyArrayOfAllPeople(addressBookInit); // get array of all contacts CFArraySortValues (abContacts, CFRangeMake(0, CFArrayGetCount(abContacts)), (CFComparatorFunction)ABPersonComparePeopleByName, (void *)ABPersonGetSortOrdering()); NSArray *copypeople = (NSArray *) abContacts; NSMutableArray *tempTheadlist = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init]; for (int i=0; i < copypeople.count; i++) { NSAutoreleasePool *pool = [[NSAutoreleasePool alloc] init]; ABRecordRef record = [copypeople objectAtIndex:i]; if (blah blah) [tempThreadList addObject: someObject]; [pool release]; } // POINT OF CRASH AFTER LOOP ENDS if (tempTheadlist.count > 0) [NSThread detachNewThreadSelector: @selector(loading_pictures:) toTarget:self withObject:tempTheadlist]; [tempTheadlist release]; [copypeople release]; CFRelease(addressBookInit); Any reason why it should crash at any point here?

    Read the article

  • Why can't I reserve 1,000,000,000 in my vector ?

    - by vipersnake005
    When I type in the foll. code, I get the output as 1073741823. #include <iostream> #include <vector> using namespace std; int main() { vector <int> v; cout<<v.max_size(); return 0; } However when I try to resize the vector to 1,000,000,000, by v.resize(1000000000); the program stops executing. How can I enable the program to allocate the required memory, when it seems that it should be able to? I am using MinGW in Windows 7. I have 2 GB RAM. Should it not be possible? In case it is not possible, can't I declare it as an array of integers and get away? BUt even that doesn't work. Another thing is that, suppose I would use a file(which can easily handle so much data ). How can I let it read and write and the same time. Using fstream file("file.txt', ios::out | ios::in ); doesn't create a file, in the first place. But supposing the file exists, I am unable to use to do reading and writing simultaneously. WHat I mean is this : Let the contents of the file be 111111 Then if I run : - #include <fstream> #include <iostream> using namespace std; int main() { fstream file("file.txt",ios:in|ios::out); char x; while( file>>x) { file<<'0'; } return 0; } Shouldn't the file's contents now be 101010 ? Read one character and then overwrite the next one with 0 ? Or incase the entire contents were read at once into some buffer, should there not be atleast one 0 in the file ? 1111110 ? But the contents remain unaltered. Please explain. Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Help with memory leak (malloc)

    - by user146780
    I'v followed a tutorial to use OGL tesselaton. In one of the callbacks there is a malloc and it creates a leak every time I render a new frame. void CALLBACK combineCallback(GLdouble coords[3], GLdouble *vertex_data[4], GLfloat weight[4], GLdouble **dataOut) { GLdouble *vertex; vertex = (GLdouble *) malloc(6 * sizeof(GLdouble)); vertex[0] = coords[0]; vertex[1] = coords[1]; vertex[2] = coords[2]; for (int i = 3; i < 6; i++) { vertex[i] = weight[0] * vertex_data[0][i] + weight[1] * vertex_data[0][i] + weight[2] * vertex_data[0][i] + weight[3] * vertex_data[0][i]; } *dataOut = vertex; } I'v tried to free(vertex) but then the polygons did not render. I also tried allocating on the heap then doing delete(vertex) but then the polygon rendered awkwardly. I'm not sure what to do. Thanks

    Read the article

  • C++ Static Array Initialization - Memory Issue

    - by donalmg
    Hi, I have a header file which contains a member variable declaration of a static char array: class ABC { public: static char newArray[4]; // other variables / functions private: void setArray(int i, char * ptr); } In the CPP file, I have the array initialized to NULL: char ABC::newArray[4] = {0}; In the ABC constructor, I need to overwrite this value with a value constructed at runtime, such as the encoding of an integer: ABC::ABC() { int i; //some int value defined at runtime memset(newArray, 0, 4); // not sure if this is necessary setArray(i,newArray); } ... void setArray(int i, char * value) { // encoding i to set value[0] ... value [3] } When I return from this function, and print the modified newArray value, it prints out many more characters than the 4 specified in the array declaration. Any ideas why this is the case. I just want to set the char array to 4 characters and nothing further. Thanks...

    Read the article

  • Difference between macros and functions in C in relation to instruction memory and speed

    - by DAHANS
    To my understanding the difference between a macro and a function is, that a macro-call will be replaced by the instruction in the definition, and a function does the whole push, branch and pop -thing. Is this right, or have I understand something wrong? Additionally, if this is right, it would mean, that macros would take more space, but would be faster (because of the lack of the push,branch and pop instructions.), wouldn't it?

    Read the article

  • Sending a file from memory (rather than disk) over HTTP using libcurl

    - by cinek1lol
    Hi! I would like to send pictures via a program written in C + +. - OK WinExec("C:\\curl\\curl.exe -H Expect: -F \"fileupload=@C:\\curl\\ok.jpg\" -F \"xml=yes\" -# \"http://www.imageshack.us/index.php\" -o data.txt -A \"Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1\" -e \"http://www.imageshack.us\"", NULL); It works, but I would like to send the pictures from pre-loaded carrier to a variable char (you know what I mean? First off, I load the pictures into a variable and then send the variable), cause now I have to specify the path of the picture on a disk. I wanted to write this program in c++ by using the curl library, not through exe. extension. I have also found such a program (which has been modified by me a bit) #include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> #include <iostream> #include <curl/curl.h> #include <curl/types.h> #include <curl/easy.h> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { CURL *curl; CURLcode res; struct curl_httppost *formpost=NULL; struct curl_httppost *lastptr=NULL; struct curl_slist *headerlist=NULL; static const char buf[] = "Expect:"; curl_global_init(CURL_GLOBAL_ALL); /* Fill in the file upload field */ curl_formadd(&formpost, &lastptr, CURLFORM_COPYNAME, "send", CURLFORM_FILE, "nowy.jpg", CURLFORM_END); curl_formadd(&formpost, &lastptr, CURLFORM_COPYNAME, "nowy.jpg", CURLFORM_COPYCONTENTS, "nowy.jpg", CURLFORM_END); curl_formadd(&formpost, &lastptr, CURLFORM_COPYNAME, "submit", CURLFORM_COPYCONTENTS, "send", CURLFORM_END); curl = curl_easy_init(); headerlist = curl_slist_append(headerlist, buf); if(curl) { curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_URL, "http://www.imageshack.us/index.php"); if ( (argc == 2) && (!strcmp(argv[1], "xml=yes")) ) curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER, headerlist); curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_HTTPPOST, formpost); res = curl_easy_perform(curl); curl_easy_cleanup(curl); curl_formfree(formpost); curl_slist_free_all (headerlist); } system("pause"); return 0; }

    Read the article

  • memory leaks in Instruments

    - by jj
    I'm getting lots of leaks in my code, but none of the leaks point to any of my code (they are all UIKit methods). I'm running 3.0. Could someone tell me how I go about figuring out where these leaks are coming from?

    Read the article

  • Understanding memory leak in Android app.

    - by sat
    After going through few articles about performance, Not able to get this statement exactly. "When a Drawable is attached to a view, the view is set as a callback on the drawable" Soln: "Setting the stored drawables’ callbacks to null when the activity is destroyed." What does that mean, e.g. In my app , I initialize an imageButton in onCreate() like this, imgButton= (ImageButton) findViewById(R.id.imagebtn); At later stage, I get an image from an url, get the stream and convert that to drawable, and set image btn like this, imgButton.setImageDrawable(drawable); According to the above statement, when I am exiting my app, say in onDestroy() I have to set stored drawables’ callbacks to null, not able to understand this part ! In this simple case what I have to set as null ? I am using Android 2.2 Froyo, whether this technique is required, or not necessary.

    Read the article

  • how to copy an array into somewhere else in the memory by using the pointer

    - by user2758510
    I am completely new in c++ programming. I want to copy the array called distances into where pointer is pointing to and then I want to print out the resul to see if it is worked or not. this is what I have done: int distances[4][6]={{1,0,0,0,1,0},{1,1,0,0,1,1},{1,0,0,0,0,0},{1,1,0,1,0,0}}; int *ptr; ptr = new int[sizeof(distances[0])]; for(int i=0; i<sizeof(distances[0]); i++){ ptr=distances[i]; ptr++; } I do not know how to print out the contents of the pointer to see how it works.

    Read the article

  • Objects with inheritance memory storage

    - by nikitas350
    Say that i have some classes like this example. class A { int k, m; public: A(int a, int b) { k = a; m = b; } }; class B { int k, m; public: B() { k = 2; m = 3; } }; class C : private A, private B { int k, m; public: C(int a, int b) : A(a, b) { k = b; m = a; } }; Now, in a class C object, are the variables stored in a specific way? I know what happens in a POD object, but this is not a POD object...

    Read the article

  • Dynamic memory allocation with default values

    - by viswanathan
    class A { private: int m_nValue; public: A() { m_nValue = 0; } A(int nValue) { m_nValue = nValue); ~A() {} } Now in main if i call A a(2);// 2 will be assigned for m_nValue of object A. Now how do we do this if i want to define an array of objects. Also how do we do this if i dynamically create objects using operator new like A *pA; pA = new A[5];// while creating the object i want the parameterised constructor to be //called I hope the question is clear. Do let me know if more explanation is needed

    Read the article

  • Best way to indicate more results available

    - by Alex Stangl
    We have a service to return messages. We want to limit the number returned, either allowing the caller to specify the max number to return, or else to use an internal hard limit. We also have thought it would be nice to include in the response whether more messages are available. The "best" way to go about this is not clear. Here are some ideas so far: Only set the "more messages" indicator if the user did not specify a max limit, and the internal max limit was hit. Same as #1 except that "more messages" indicator set regardless of whether the internal hard limit is hit, or the user-specified limit is hit. Same as #1 (or #2) except that we internally read limit + 1 records, but only return limit records, so we know "for sure" there is at least one additional message rather than "maybe" there are additional messages. Do away with the "more messages" flag, as it is confusing and unnecessary. Instead force the user to keep calling the API until it returns no messages. Change "more messages" indicator to something more akin to an EOF indicator, only set when the last message is known to have been retrieved and returned. What do you think is the best solution? (Doesn't have to be one of the above choices.) I searched and couldn't find a similar question already asked. Hopefully this is not "too subjective".

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164  | Next Page >