Search Results

Search found 26142 results on 1046 pages for 'javascript alert'.

Page 161/1046 | < Previous Page | 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168  | Next Page >

  • Pure HTML + JavaScript client side templating

    - by Dev er dev
    I want to have achieve something similar to Java Tiles framework using only client side technologies (no server side includes). I would like to have one page, eg layout.html which will contain layout definition. Content placeholder in that page would be empty #content div tag. I would like to have different content injected on that page based on url. Something like layout.html?content=main or layout.html?content=edit will display page with content replaced with main.html or edit.html. The goal is to avoid duplicating code, even for layout, and to compose pages without server-side templating. What approach would you suggest? EDIT: I don't need a full templating library, just a way to compose a pages, similar for what tiles do.

    Read the article

  • Is the javaScript not part of the DOM?

    - by DKinzer
    Why is it that scripts can still function even after the code used to create them is removed from the DOM? I ran into a situation where I wanted to prevent a broken script from running (@see my post). In my attempt to come up with a solution I wrote an extension with the following line (just to see what would happen). //doc is passed here because this script is running as a firefox extension outside //of the document context. $('script', doc).remove(); I assumed that this would remove all the scripts from the DOM, which it did, and that therefore no scripts would run on the page, which is not the case. I would love to know more about what's behind this behavior.

    Read the article

  • JavaScript Loop and wait for function

    - by Fluidbyte
    I have a simple single-dimension array, let's say: fruits = ["apples","bananas","oranges","peaches","plums"]; I can loop thru with with $.each() function: $.each(fruits, function(index, fruit) { showFruit(fruit); }); but I'm calling to another function which I need to finish before moving on to the next item. So, if I have a function like this: function showFruit(fruit){ $.getScript('some/script.js',function(){ // Do stuff }) } What's the best way to make sure the previous fruit has been appended before moving on?

    Read the article

  • JavaScript try/catch: errors or exceptions?

    - by Josh
    OK. I may be splitting hairs here, but my code isn't consistent and I'd like to make it so. But before I do, I want to make sure I'm going the right way. In practice this doesn't matter, but this has been bothering me for a while so I figured I'd ask my peers... Every time I use a try... catch statement, in the catch block I always log a message to my internal console. However my log messages are not consistent. They either look like: catch(err) { DFTools.console.log("someMethod caught an error: ",err.message); ... or: catch(ex) { DFTools.console.log("someMethod caught an exception: ",ex.message); ... Obviously the code functions properly either way but it's starting to bother me that I sometimes refer to "errors" and sometimes to "exceptions". Like I said, maybe I'm splitting hairs but which is the proper terminology? "Exception", or "Error"?

    Read the article

  • page transitions using javascript

    - by hasan
    hey, i saw this on a site a couple of days ago and i cant seem to find it again. in any case, this is what was on the site: the page opened regularly when you entered the url. upon clicking one of the links on the page, it "transitioned" to the next page (there was a color change). and the url in the address bar was changed to reflect that. eg: if the background was blue on site.com, when clicking on the about link, the background would change to green and the browser would show site.com/about. and so on. also, if the url entered was site.com/about, the bg would be green and on cliking the home page, the site would transition from green to blue and browser would show site.com im interested in finding out how this was done. searching on google got me the meta-refresh tag, but the ffect was much more complex and worked on all browsers. is there any other method out there?

    Read the article

  • Javascript onclick stops working, multiple dynamically created divs.

    - by Patrick
    I have run into a strange problem, i am creating a lot of dynamically divs. And i recently found out that some of my divs doesn't fire the onclick event? All the divs are created using the same template, so why are some not working? Most of the time, its the 4-5 from the bottom. If you click on one of the others and then try again, you might get one of those to trigger. But only sporadically. Code to create the divs: GameField.prototype.InitField = function(fieldNumber) { var newField = document.createElement("div"); if (fieldNumber == 0 || fieldNumber == 6 || fieldNumber == 8 || fieldNumber == 17) newField.className = 'gameCellSmall borderFull gameText gameTextAlign'; else newField.className = 'gameCellSmall borderWithoutTop gameText gameTextAlign'; var instance = this; if (fieldNumber == 6 || fieldNumber == 7 || fieldNumber == 17) { } else newField.onclick = function() { instance.DivClick(fieldNumber); return false; } this.fields[fieldNumber] = newField; this.score[fieldNumber] = 0; return newField; } I added the return false to the click function, but it still behaves strangely. Why are some not triggering? I create around 18 divs / player. But it happens even if i just create one player. Do i perhaps need to cancel the event once i am done with it? (Like the return false; is trying to do)

    Read the article

  • Loading html dynamically using Javascript and PHP

    - by Vafello
    I have the following code: <?php if ($x == 1){ ?> <b>Some html...</b> <?php } else if ($x==2){ ?> <b> Other html...</b> <?php } ?> Now I would like to have two links below (a href) and somehow pass the variable $x (so Link1 passes x=1 and Link2 passes x=2) in order to load the relevant bit of code from if statement. I know I can pass $x using form and then test its value and load required bit of code, but I would like to do it smoothly, without reloading the page. I think that JQuery could help it, but I have no idea how to do it. Any ideas greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Evaluating Javascript Arrays

    - by FailBoy
    I have an array that contains an array of arrays if that makes any sense. so for example: [[1, 2, 3], [2, 3, 4], [3, 4, 5], [4, 5, 6]] I want to see whether an array exists withing the array, so if [1, 2, 3] is duplicated at all. I have tried to use the .indexOf method but it does find the duplicate. I have also tried Extjs to loop through the array manually and to evaluate each inner array, this is how I did it: var arrayToSearch = [[1, 2, 3], [2, 3, 4], [3, 4, 5], [4, 5, 6]]; var newArray = [1, 2, 3]; Ext.each(arrayToSearch, function(entry, index){ console.log(newArray, entry); if(newArray == entry){ console.log(index); }; }); This also does not detect the duplicate. the console.log will output [1, 2, 3] and [1, 2, 3] but will not recognize them as equal. I have also tried the === evaluator but obviously since == doesn't work the === wont work. I am at wits end, any suggestions.

    Read the article

  • complex web forms and javascript

    - by Casey
    I need to create a few data heavy complicated forms. Currently, the information is being entered into a spread sheet, but the users will need to enter the information into the online form where it will be saved to a database. The problem is that the business users currently using the spread sheet aren't going to want to use the online application if it isn't as easy as entering the information into the spread sheet. This is further complicated in that the information they are entering into the spread sheet is represented by three different DB tables where one "object" is composed of two of the others. I would prefer to not have them have to go through multiple forms. Some of what I have been thinking is: Use of auto complete where possible Hiding/removing form fields dynamically possible wizard style page flow?? I've been googling for other data heavy web forms but can't seem to really find any good examples. I am familiar with jQuery and prototypejs and have also tried googling for frameworks designed for data heavy applications but didn't come up with anything. Any thoughts? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How to find the parent element using javascript

    - by Kalpana
    I want to change the background color of the table cell when radio button inside the cell is clicked. <table> <tr> <c:forEach items="#{books}" var="book"> <td align="center"> <h:selectOneRadio value="#{book.price}" onclick="this.parentElement.style.background-color='red';"> <f:selectItems value="#{books.getDetails()}" /> </h:selectOneRadio> </td> </c:forEach> </tr> </table> How to get the parent element reference.

    Read the article

  • how to set values to combobox dynamically in javascript

    - by Learner
    this is how i set value to a combobox using dwr call, var reportID = '<%=reportid%>'; var reportName = '<%=reportname%>'; loadReportNames(reportUserID); function loadReportNames(reportUserID){ CustomiseReportAction.getReportNames(reportUserID, addReportNamesDropDown); } function addReportNamesDropDown(resultMap){ dwr.util.removeAllOptions("reportnames"); dwr.util.addOptions("reportnames",resultMap); } after loading the combo box i set values to loaded combo like this, document.getElementById("reportnames").value=reportID; but the reportID is not set, what could be the problem please help me to resolve this. UPDATE : function addCombo() { var reportID = '<%=reportid%'; var reportName = '<%=reportname%'; var textb = document.getElementById("reportnames"); var option = document.createElement("option"); option.text = reportName; option.value = reportID; option.selected="selected"; try { textb.add(option, null); //Standard }catch(error) { textb.add(option); // IE only } textb.value = ""; } used above method it gives me no exception but no results. Regards

    Read the article

  • Selecting pictures with Jquery and Javascript

    - by Axschech
    I'm testing out a layout on a website using 3 pictures here: Schechterbusiness.info the left button works, making it go through the pictures. But I can't figure out how to get the right button to work, which is supposed to scroll through the other way. I know there's probably a way to do it with arrays but I can't wrap my brain around it. Halp! Code to scroll through pictures: $('#fryLink').click(function() { $('#hide').hide(); $('#img').hide(); count++; if(count == 1) { $('#img').attr("src","images/fry.png"); } else if(count == 2) { $('#img').attr("src","images/bender.png"); } else if(count == 3) { $('#img').attr("src","images/zoidberg.png"); } $('#img').show("fade"); if(count > 2) { count = 0; }

    Read the article

  • clearTimeout not working in javascript autocomplete script

    - by Travis
    I am using the following code as part of an autocomplete script to avoid hammering the server with every keystroke: var that = this; textInput.bind("keyup", function() { clearTimeout(that.timer); that.timer = setTimeout (that.doStuff(), 2000); }); Unfortunately, this does not clear the old timers. They still all execute. Does anyone know what I'm missing? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Overwriting arguments object for a Javascript function

    - by Ian Storm Taylor
    If I have the following: // Clean input. $.each(arguments, function(index, value) { arguments[index] = value.replace(/[\W\s]+/g, '').toLowerCase(); }); Would that be a bad thing to do? I have no further use for the uncleaned arguments in the function, and it would be nice not to create a useless copy of arguments just to use them, but are there any negative effects to doing this? Ideally I would have done this, but I'm guessing this runs into problems since arguments isn't really an Array: arguments = $.map(arguments, function(value) { return value.replace(/[\W\s]+/g, '').toLowerCase(); }); Thanks for any input. EDIT: I've just realized that both of these are now inside their own functions, so the arguments object has changed. Any way to do this without creating an unnecessary variable?

    Read the article

  • How to control the system volume using javascript

    - by Geetha
    Hi, I am using media player to play audio and video. I am creating own button to increase and decrease the volume of the media player. working fine too. Problem: Even after reaches 0% volume its audible. If the player volume increase the system volume also be increased. Is it possible. How to achieve this task. Control: <object id="mediaPlayer" classid="clsid:22D6F312-B0F6-11D0-94AB-0080C74C7E95" codebase="http://activex.microsoft.com/activex/controls/mplayer/en/nsmp2inf.cab#Version=5,1,52,701" height="1" standby="Loading Microsoft Windows Media Player components..." type="application/x-oleobject" width="1"> <param name="fileName" value="" /> <param name="animationatStart" value="true" /> <param name="transparentatStart" value="true" /> <param name="autoStart" value="true" /> <param name="showControls" value="true" /> <param name="volume" value="70" /> </object> Code: function decAudio() { if (document.mediaPlayer.Volume >= -1000) { var newVolume = document.mediaPlayer.Volume - 100; if (newVolume >= -1000) { document.mediaPlayer.Volume = document.mediaPlayer.Volume - 100; } else { document.mediaPlayer.Volume = -1000; } } }

    Read the article

  • Help with regex in javascript.

    - by Bipul
    Whatever string is given I have to see if there is exactly one space after and before =, If it is more than one space in either side I have to reduce that to one and if there is none, I have to insert one. How should I do that ? String can contain anything. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Strange behavior: Dynamic expressions with RegExp Object in RegExp.match (Javascript)

    - by NeDark
    I have detect a strange behavior in regexps created with the RegExp object: With this code: var exp1 = /./; var exp2 = new RegExp('.'); ? var test1 = exp1.test('large\n\ntext..etc.'); var test2 = exp2.test('large\n\ntext..etc.'); ? var match1 = 'large\n\ntext..etc.'.match(exp1); var match2 = 'large\n\ntext..etc.'.match(exp2); ...the result is: test1 = true test2 = true ? match1 = 'l' (first match) match2 = null With the regexp maked with the regexp object from a string it finds nothing... Why does this happends? Thanks!!

    Read the article

  • Streamlining my javascript with a function

    - by liz
    i have a series of select lists, that i am using to populate text boxes with ids. so you click a select option and another text box is filled with its id. with just one select/id pair this works fine, but i have multiples, and the only thing that changes is the id of the select and input.. in fact just the ending changes, the inputs all start with featredproductid and the select ids all start with recipesproduct and then both end with the category. i know that listing this over and over for each category is not the way to do it. i think i need to make an array of the categories var cats = ['olive oil', "grains", "pasta"] and then use a forEach function? maybe? here is the clunky code window.addEvent('domready', function() { $('recipesproductoliveoil').addEvent('change', function(e){ pidselected = this.options[this.selectedIndex].getProperty('value') ; $("featuredproductidoliveoil").setProperties({ value: pidselected}); ; }); $('recipesproductgrains').addEvent('change', function(e){ pidselected = this.options[this.selectedIndex].getProperty('value') ; $("featuredproductidgrains").setProperties({ value: pidselected}); ; }); $('recipesproductpasta').addEvent('change', function(e){ pidselected = this.options[this.selectedIndex].getProperty('value') ; $("featuredproductidpasta").setProperties({ value: pidselected}); ; }); $('recipesproductpantry').addEvent('change', function(e){ pidselected = this.options[this.selectedIndex].getProperty('value') ; $("featuredproductidpantry").setProperties({ value: pidselected}); ; }); }); keep in mind this is mootools 1.1 (no i cant update it sorry). i am sure this is kind of basic, something i seem to have wrapping my brain around. but i am quite sure doing it as above is not really good...

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168  | Next Page >