Search Results

Search found 6559 results on 263 pages for 'parallel foreach'.

Page 163/263 | < Previous Page | 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170  | Next Page >

  • output files from a second directory in same php function

    - by Turbodurso
    I have the following code to output images from directory im/, how can I tweak this to also output images from another diectory called out/ (for example)? As to echo another img tag under the current one? <?php $imgDir = "im/"; $images = scandir($imgDir); $ignore = array( ".", ".." ); natsort($images); foreach($images as $file) { if(!in_array($file, $ignore)) { echo "<div id=\"slideWrapper\">\n"; echo "<img src=\"im/$file\" width=\"1000\" height=\"683\" alt=\"$files\" />\n"; echo "</div>\n"; }; } ?>

    Read the article

  • C# GroupJoin effectiveness

    - by bsnote
    without using GroupJoin: var playersDictionary = players.ToDictionary(player => player.Id, element => new PlayerDto { Rounds = new List<RoundDto>() }); foreach (var round in rounds) { PlayerDto playerDto; playersDictionary.TryGetValue(round.PlayerId, out playerDto); if (playerDto != null) { playerDto.Rounds.Add(new RoundDto { }); } } var playerDtoItems = playersDictionary.Values; using GroupJoin: var playerDtoItems = from player in players join round in rounds on player.Id equals round.PlayerId into playerRounds select new PlayerDto { Rounds = playerRounds.Select(playerRound => new RoundDto {}) }; Which of these two pieces is more efficient?

    Read the article

  • LINQ Multiple LIKE based on List

    - by Bathan
    I have a list of keywords in an ArrayList and I wanted to be able to build a query to find records in a table based on this keywords. Since the list of keywords is dynamic I cannot build a fixed query here. if I do something like this: foreach (string kw in keywords) { query = query.Where(p => p.Name.StartsWith(kw)); } The "StartsWith" is required here because I need to search those records that actually start with the provided keyword. In T-SQL it Would be something like this Select * from Table where Name like 'keyword1%' or Name like 'keyword2%' or Name like 'keyword3%' or ... But I need to be able to do this in LINQ...Is this possible?

    Read the article

  • how to add values in array

    - by nhoyti
    hi guys, i just want to ask help again. I've created a method to read values in gridview, i was able to get and read values from the gridview. The problem now, is how can i store the values inside an array and i want it to pass on the other page. here's the code i've created private void getrowvalues() { string combinedvalues; foreach (GridViewRow row in gvOrderProducts.Rows) { string prodname = ((Label)row.FindControl("lblProductName")).Text; string txtvalues = ((TextBox)row.FindControl("txtQuantity")).Text; combinedvalues = prodname + "|" + txtvalues; } } i want the result string combinedvalues to be put in an array or collection of strings which i can be access in other page. Is there a way to do it? Any inputs will be greatly appreciated. thanks!!

    Read the article

  • How to optimize indexing of large number of DB records using Zend_Lucene and Zend_Paginator

    - by jdichev
    So I have this cron script that is deployed and ran using Cron on a host and indexes all the records in a database table - the index is later used both for the front end of the site and the backed operations as well. After the operation, the index is about 3-4 MB. The problem is it takes a lot of resources (CPU: 30+ and a good chunk of memory) and slows the machine down. My question is about how to optimize the operation described below: First there is a select query built using the Zend Framework API, this query is then passed to a Paginator factory that returns a paginator which I am using to balance the current number of items being indexed and not iterate over too much items. The script is iterating over the current items in the paginator object using a foreach loop until reaching the end and then it starts from the beginning after getting items for the next page. I am suspecting this overhead is caused by the Zend_Lucene but no idea how this could be improved.

    Read the article

  • efficiently compare two BitArrays of the same length

    - by BobTurbo
    How would I do this? I am trying to count when both arrays have the same value of TRUE/1 at the same index. As you can see, my code has multiple bitarrays and is looping through each one and comparing them with a comparisonArray with another loop. It doesn't seem to be very efficient and I need it to be. foreach (bitArrayTuple in bitarryList) { for (int i = 0; i < arrayLength; i++) if (bArrayTuple.Item2[i] && comparisonArray[i]) bitArrayTuple.Item1++; } where Item1 is the count and Item2 is a bitarray.

    Read the article

  • check existense between two IEnumerable

    - by sunglim
    IEnumerable<String> existedThings = from mdinfo in mdInfoTotal select mdinfo.ItemNo; IEnumerable<String> thingsToSave = from item in lbXReadSuccess.Items.Cast<ListItem>() select item.Value; Here are two IEnumerable. I want to check whether a value in existedThings exist in thingsToSave. O.K. I can do that with 3 line code. bool hasItemNo; foreach(string itemNo in existedThings) hasItemNo= thingsToSave.Contains(itemNo); But, It looks dirty. I just want to know if there better solution.

    Read the article

  • Assembly 6800 Looping? Testing specific bits in a word.

    - by Jeremy
    Hi all, Trying to help a friend out with a friend out with some assembly code, but I've run into a small problem. I'm trying to work out how I would loop through a 8 bit binary word and check the value of specific bits. I need to check bits 1, 3, 5 & 7 to see if they are 1. i.e. int count = 1; int bitAdd = 0; foreach (var bit in word) { if (count = 1 || count = 3 || count = 5 || count = 7) { bitAdd += 1; } count += 1; } Help is much appreciated.

    Read the article

  • result set using two different views (from an if statement)

    - by mailman1979
    Hi All, I have a bit of code that works with a result set called "result" (original I know) but depending on the incoming variable I'd like to fire the specific query depending. I have the below in an if statement but that just makes the "result" recordset gets those nasty red lines and it doesn't work. I'm sure this is easy to work out. if (area == "dashboard") { IQueryable<ViewGetNavigationMainItem> result = (from m in _entities.ViewGetNavigationMainItems where m.area.Trim() == area.Trim() where m.state == "Online" where m.parentID == parentID orderby m.sequence ascending select m); } else { //Get the Content Items IQueryable<ViewGetNavigationContentItem> result = (from m in _entities.ViewGetNavigationContentItems where m.navID == navID where m.parentID == parentID orderby m.contentOrder ascending select m); } maxRecords = result.Count(); foreach (var item in result) { etc etc etc

    Read the article

  • LINQ How to force query to materialize?

    - by Bobb
    Say I have simple LINQ extenstion: var filtered = data.Where(i => i.Count > 0); I know that this will not evaluated unless I start to use filtered i.e. foreach(DataItem i in filtered) ... However I need to create cloned version of data and release data as soon as possible. data can be changed in other thread so I want to get immediate snapshot of it. How can I force filtered to be evaluated immediately?

    Read the article

  • Dollar sign and/or Dash breaking Razor's parser

    - by justSteve
    the end-result i'm trying to render: <input type="radio" name="options" id="options_1" />$1 - A Not Very Expensive Chocolate <input type="radio" name="options" id="options_2" />$10 - A Kinda Expensive Chocolate <input type="radio" name="options" id="options_3" />$100 - A Really Expensive Chocolate From this code: @foreach (var o in Model.Options){ <input type="radio" name="options" id=@("options_" + @o.ID) />[email protected] - @o.Label } If i drop both the '$' and the '-' from what should be plain old text - stuff works. Adding either resulted in compiler warnings and runtime errors. I've tried the explicit syntax as described here but haven't found the right combination yet.

    Read the article

  • Minimum 4 Characters or Show Nothing - PHP

    - by ali
    Hi, I want to show up only words with minimum 4 Characters, actually I can limit the hits and show only words with min. 100 hits - but how can I set a min. character length? thank you! function sm_list_recent_searches($before = '', $after = '', $count = 20) { // List the most recent successful searches. global $wpdb, $table_prefix; $count = intval($count); $results = $wpdb->get_results( "SELECT `terms`, `datetime` FROM `{$table_prefix}searchmeter_recent` WHERE 100 < `hits` ORDER BY `datetime` DESC LIMIT $count"); if (count($results)) { foreach ($results as $result) { echo '<a href="'. get_settings('home') . '/search/' . urlencode($result->terms) . '">'. htmlspecialchars($result->terms) .'</a>'.", "; } } }

    Read the article

  • 42000 Syntax error in query when executing prepared statement

    - by Griff McGriff
    I have been pulling my hair out trying to swap my current script over to PDO. I have simplified the MySQL query for this example, but the error remains even with this version. $sql = 'SELECT * FROM :table WHERE lastUpdate > :appDate'; try{ $db = connect(); $stmt = $db->prepare($sql); $stmt->bindParam(':table', $table); $stmt->bindParam(':appDate', $appDate); foreach($tablesToCheck as $table){ $stmt->execute(); $resultset[] = $stmt->fetchAll(); } } catch(PDOException $e){ print 'Error!: '.$e->getMessage().'<br/>'; }//End try catch $stmt-errorInfo() returns: ( [0] => 42000 [1] => 1064 [2] => You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near ''GroupName' WHERE lastUpdate > NULL' at line 1 )

    Read the article

  • Need help setting up json array

    - by torr
    A database query returns several rows which I loop through as follows: foreach ($query->result() as $row) { $data[$row->post_id]['post_id'] = $row->post_id; $data[$row->post_id]['post_type'] = $row->post_type; $data[$row->post_id]['post_text'] = $row->post_text; } If I json_encode the resulting array ($a['stream']) I get { "stream": { "1029": { "post_id": "1029", "post_type": "1", "post_text": "bla1", }, "1029": { "post_id": "1030", "post_type": "3", "post_text": "bla2", }, "1029": { "post_id": "1031", "post_type": "2", "post_text": "bla3", } } } But the json should actually look like this: { "stream": { "posts": [{ "post_id": "1029", "post_type": "1", "post_text": "bla1", }, { "post_id": "1030", "post_type": "3", "post_text": "bla2", }, { "post_id": "1031", "post_type": "2", "post_text": "bla3", }] } } How should I build my array to get this json right?

    Read the article

  • How to create array items by specify a key that includes hierachy ?

    - by Relax
    Given original codes as: foreach($option as $name=>$value) $array[$name] = $value; and $name as button[0][text], button[0][value], button[1][text], spider[0][name], ... The result array would be array('button[0][text]' => 'its text', 'button[0][value]' => 'its value', 'button[1][text]' => 'its text', 'spider[0][name]' => 'its name', ) However, what i want is array('button' => array( array('text'=>'its text', 'value'=>'its value'), // this is $array[button][0] array('text'=>'its text') // this is $array[button][1] ), 'spider' => array( array('name'=>'its name') // this is $array[spider][0] ) ) How could i do this? ...

    Read the article

  • Entity Framework 4 - Delete Object

    - by GibboK
    I have 3 Tables in my DataBase CmsMasterPages CmsMasterPagesAdvSlots (Pure Juction Table) CmsAdvSlots Here a Picture of my EDM: I need find out all objects CmsAdvSlot connected with a CmsMasterPage (it is working in my code posted belove), and DELETE the result (CmsAdvSlot) from the DataBase. My Problem is I am not able to DELETE this Objects when I found theme. Error: The object cannot be deleted because it was not found in the ObjectStateManager. int findMasterPageId = Convert.ToInt32(uxMasterPagesListSelector.SelectedValue); CmsMasterPage myMasterPage = context.CmsMasterPages.FirstOrDefault(x => x.MasterPageId == findMasterPageId); var resultAdvSlots = myMasterPage.CmsAdvSlots; // It is working until here foreach (var toDeleteAdv in resultAdvSlots) { context.DeleteObject(myMasterPage.CmsAdvSlots.Any()); // ERORR HERE!! context.SaveChanges(); } Any idea how to solve it? Thanks for your time! :-)

    Read the article

  • Write Unit test for sorting

    - by user175084
    I need to write a unit test for a method where I arrange data according to another default list. This is the method. internal AData[] GetDataArrayInInitialSortOrder(ABData aBData) { Dictionary<string,AData > aMap = aBData.ADataArray.ToDictionary(v => v.GroupName, v => v); List<AData> newDataList = new List<AData>(); foreach (AData aData in _viewModel.ADList) newDataList.Add(aMap[aData.GroupName]); return newDataList.ToArray(); } Please help I am new in unit testing and this is not easy for me. Any sample or links are appreciated Thanks

    Read the article

  • C# How to place a comma after each word but the last in the list

    - by user576712
    I totally new to C# and learning as I go. I am stuck on issue which I'm hoping an experienced programmer can help. I have added a CheckedListBox to my form and added a collection of 6 items to it. I need all but the last item selected to have a comma placed beside it, so my question is: how can I tell C# NOT to place a comma beside the last item selected? foreach (object itemChecked in RolesCheckedListBox.CheckedItems) { sw.Write(itemChecked.ToString() + ","); } Thanks for any help received! Dan

    Read the article

  • Using locks inside a loop

    - by Xaqron
    // Member Variable private readonly object _syncLock = new object(); // Now inside a static method foreach (var lazyObject in plugins) { if ((string)lazyObject.Metadata["key"] = "something") { lock (_syncLock) { if (!lazyObject.IsValueCreated) lazyObject.value.DoSomething(); } return lazyObject.value; } } Here I need synchronized access per loop. There are many threads iterating this loop and based on the key they are looking for, a lazy instance is created and returned. lazyObject should not be created more that one time. Although Lazy class is for doing so and despite of the used lock, under high threading I have more than one instance created (I track this with a Interlocked.Increment on a volatile shared int and log it somewhere). The problem is I don't have access to definition of Lazy and MEF defines how the Lazy class create objects. My questions: 1) Why the lock doesn't work ? 2) Should I use an array of locks instead of one lock for performance improvement ?

    Read the article

  • How can I make a read-only ObservableCollection property?

    - by thrag
    I'd like to expose a property on a view model that contains a list of objects (from database). I need this collection to be read-only. That is, I want to prevent Add/Remove, etc. But allow the foreach and indexers to work. My intent is to declare a private field holding the editable collection and reference it with a read-only Public Property. As follows public ObservableCollection<foo> CollectionOfFoo { get { return _CollectionOfFoo; } } However, that syntax just prevents changing the reference to the collection. It doesn't prevent add/remove, etc. What is the right way to accomplish this?

    Read the article

  • c# 4.0 - best way to refactor a block of "If (something is Type) {}" statements?

    - by Andrew Johns
    I've got some code that looks like this, public void ResetControls(Control controlOnPage) { if (controlOnPage is TextBox) { ResetTextBoxControl(controlOnPage); } if (controlOnPage is MediaPicker) { ((MediaPicker)controlOnPage).Media = null; } if (controlOnPage is RelatedContentPicker) { ((RelatedContentPicker)controlOnPage).RelatedContentCollection = null; } ... ... foreach (Control child in controlOnPage.Controls) { ResetControls(child); } } The idea behind it is that I can pass a page to the method and it'll recursively reset all the controls on it to their default states - in the case of MediaPicker and RelatedContentPicker, these are user controls that I've created. FXCop warns me "Do Not Cast Unnecessarily" for this code - but I'm unsure how to rewrite it to make it better. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Selecting a value from multiple dictionaries inside an enumeration

    - by johaanfaust
    If I have an enumeration of dictionaries IEnumerable<IDictionary<string, float>> enumeration can I perform a Linq query on it so that I can select by a value from each dictionary in the enumeration using the same key? I can do this in a loop: float f; foreach (var dictionary in enumeration) { if (dictionary.TryGetValue("some key", out f)) { Console.WriteLine(f); } } (The eventual plan is to compare the performance of the query verses the equivalent nested looping statements (the enumeration itself is formed from either another query or an equivalent set of loops).)

    Read the article

  • Velocity sort XML file with dynamic-elements

    - by shr_deadman
    Let's say I have a XML file wich looks like this: <root> <dynamic-element name='name' type='text' repeatable='true'> <dynamic-element name='prename' type='text' repeatable='false'> </dynamic element> </dynamic-element> </root> In Liferay the XML file will be filled with input. At the and I will have multiple $name-elements. The question is how I can sort the elements before I print them out with #foreach ($name in $name.getSiblings()) $name.prename.getData() $name.getData() #end thanks, Matthew

    Read the article

  • Best way to attach row from datagrid to EF.

    - by AKoran
    Using MVVM and EF...I have a datagrid binding to a View Model (using ObservableCollection). The view model has a save command which simply calls the SaveChanges command of the Data Context. However, when a user adds a new row to the datagrid, the new entity is detached. Is there any easy way to automatically attach it when it gets created. Currently, I'm having to do this in the Save command of my View Model and it seems a bit clunky: foreach (var dataItem in _DataList) // where _DataList is the ObservableCollection { if (dataItem.EntityState == EntityState.Detached) { _DataContext.AddToTestTables(dataItem); } } _DataContext.SaveChanges();

    Read the article

  • php array into mysql

    - by mckenzie
    Hello, $sql_where = ''; $exclude = '30,35,36,122,123,124,125'; if($exclude != '') { $exclude_forums = explode(',', $exclude); foreach ($exclude_forums as $id) { if ($id > 0) { $sql_where = ' AND forum_id <> ' . trim($id); } } } $sql = 'SELECT topic_title, forum_id, topic_id, topic_type, topic_last_poster_id, topic_last_poster_name, topic_last_poster_colour, topic_last_post_time FROM ' . TOPICS_TABLE . ' WHERE topic_status <> 2 AND topic_approved = 1 ' . $sql_where . ' ORDER BY topic_time DESC'; The above code i use to exclude the id of forum to be displayed on sql queries. Why doesn't it work and still display it? Any solution

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170  | Next Page >