Search Results

Search found 6532 results on 262 pages for 'computed columns'.

Page 166/262 | < Previous Page | 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173  | Next Page >

  • how to dinamically add controls in asp.net Dynamic Data

    - by loviji
    Hello, i'm trying to work with asp.NET Dynamic Data. So, I see Dynamic Data not well learned by people as other technologies. now, to my question. Lets us work with Details.aspx page that located on ~\DynamicData\PageTemplates I need to add <asp:DynamicControl runat="server" to page into Form1.detailsTable. i've tried like this: protected DynamicControl myC=new DynamicControl(); protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { foreach(var c in table.Columns) { myC.DataField=c.DisplayName; FormView1.Controls.Add(myC); } } but I can not see the desired result. where is the problem. thanks

    Read the article

  • Simple way to return anonymous types (to make MVC using LINQ possible)

    - by BlueRaja The Green Unicorn
    I'd like to implement MVC while using LINQ (specifically, LINQ-to-entities). The way I would do this is have the Controller generate (or call something which generates) the result-set using LINQ, then return that to the View to display the data. The problem is, if I do: return (from o in myTable select o); All the columns are read from the database, even the ones (potentially dozens) I don't want. And - more importantly - I can't do something like this: return (from o in myTable select new { o.column }); because there is no way to make anonymous types type-safe! I know for sure there is no nice, clean way of doing this in 3.5 (this is not clean...), but what about 4.0? Is there anything planned, or even proposed? Without something like duck-typing-for-LINQ, or type-safe anonymous return values (it seems to me the compiler should certainly be capable of that), it appears to be nearly impossible to cleanly separate the Controller from the View.

    Read the article

  • Hibernate MappingException

    - by Marcus
    I'm getting this Hibernate error: org.hibernate.MappingException: Could not determine type for: a.b.c.Results$BusinessDate, for columns: [org.hibernate.mapping.Column(businessDate)] The class is below. Does anyone know why I'm getting this error?? @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD) @XmlType(name = "", propOrder = { "businessDate" }) @XmlRootElement(name = "Results") @Entity(name = "Results") @Table(name = "RESULT") @Inheritance(strategy = InheritanceType.JOINED) @Cache(usage = CacheConcurrencyStrategy.READ_ONLY) public class Results implements Equals, HashCode { @XmlElement(name = "BusinessDate", required = true) protected Results.BusinessDate businessDate; public Results.BusinessDate getBusinessDate() { return businessDate; } public void setBusinessDate(Results.BusinessDate value) { this.businessDate = value; } @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.FIELD) @XmlType(name = "", propOrder = { "raw", "display" }) @Entity(name = "Results$BusinessDate") @Table(name = "BUSINESSDATE") @Inheritance(strategy = InheritanceType.JOINED) public static class BusinessDate implements Equals, HashCode { ....

    Read the article

  • Two Key HashSet?

    - by athena
    I need a HashSet implementation where the elements are a pair of Integers eg. Set s = { {1,2} , {3,4} , {1,4}}. Here the set s has 3 elements. This kind of two key HashSet is needed in many situations like, I have a relation in my database where the candidate key is a combination of two columns. Is there some library which already provides this? If no such implementation is available, then rather then implementing the entire data structure from scratch, will it be easier (and efficient?) to extend the HashSet implementation in Java?

    Read the article

  • MVC using LINQ? - Can't return anonymous types

    - by BlueRaja
    I'd like to implement MVC while using LINQ (specifically, LINQ-to-entities). The way I would do this is have the Controller generate (or call something which generates) the result-set using LINQ, then return that to the View to display the data. The problem is, if I do: return (from o in myTable select o); All the columns are read from the database, even the ones (potentially dozens) I don't want. And - more importantly - I can't do something like this: return (from o in myTable select new { o.column }); because there is no way to make anonymous types type-safe! I know for sure there is no nice, clean way of doing this in 3.5 (this is not clean...), but what about 4.0? Is there anything planned, or even proposed? Without something like duck-typing-for-LINQ, or type-safe anonymous return values (it seems to me the compiler should certainly be capable of that), it appears to be nearly impossible to cleanly separate the Controller from the View.

    Read the article

  • Updating records with their subordinates via CTE or subquery

    - by Mike Jolley
    Let's say I have a table with the following columns: Employees Table employeeID int employeeName varchar(50) managerID int totalOrganization int managerID is referential to employeeID. totalOrganization is currently 0 for all records. I'd like to update totalOrganization on each row to the total number of employees under them. So with the following records: employeeID employeeName managerID totalOrganization 1 John Cruz NULL 0 2 Mark Russell 1 0 3 Alice Johnson 1 0 4 Juan Valdez 3 0 The query should update the totalOrganizations to: employeeID employeeName managerID totalOrganization 1 John Cruz NULL 3 2 Mark Russell 1 0 3 Alice Johnson 1 1 4 Juan Valdez 3 0 I know I can get somewhat of an org. chart using the following CTE: WITH OrgChart (employeeID, employeeName,managerID,level) AS ( SELECT employeeID,employeeName,0 as managerID,0 AS Level FROM Employees WHERE managerID IS NULL UNION ALL SELECT Employees.employeeID,Employees.employeeName,Employees.managerID,Level + 1 FROM Employees INNER JOIN OrgChart ON Employees.managerID = OrgChart.employeeID ) SELECT employeeID,employeeName,managerID, level FROM OrgChart; Is there any way to update the Employees table using a stored procedure rather than building some routine outside of SQL to parse through the data?

    Read the article

  • WPF DataGrid default column types

    - by Trindaz
    Hi, I'm using a DataGrid to display 2 possible types of DataRow in a DataTable. One type has the column Parent = NULL and the other has Parent set to another DataRow in the same DataTable. The list of column in the DataTable is always different, so explicitly describing each column is not possible. I want to display a UserControl in every cell of the Parent = DataRow rows, and default Text / Check boxes for the Parent = NULL rows. My first strategy is to try and set the default Column type for all automatically generated columns to be a DataGridTemplateColumn, regardless of datatype, so that I can use styles to then use either my UserControl or CheckBox or TextBox where required. How can I do this? More importantly, though, is there a better strategy than this? Cheers, Dave

    Read the article

  • JQuery Autocomplete - format listing and only return a part to the text box

    - by Jason
    I'm using the JQuery Autocomplete and it's working just fine. I'm using it to allow someone to search for users out of a database by searching on last name or id number. Right now the drop down list that is created is the resultes of a SQL query and looks something like: $row_rst['lName'] . ', ' . $row_rst['fName'] . " - " . $row_rst['user'] . "|" . $row_rst['id'] which outputs something like: Jones, Henry - hjones Gibbons, Peter - pgibbons When I pick Henry the text box gets Jones, Henry - hjones and the hidden field gets his id. I'd like to format the drop down in columns if possible and only return Jones, Henry to the text box if possible. Are either of those options possible? I'm thinking it has to do with either formatItem(row) or formatResult(row) but I'm not sure and I can't seem to find how to go about this.

    Read the article

  • Hash of unique value = unique hash?

    - by Nebs
    Theoretically does hashing a unique value yield a unique value? Let's say I have a DB table with 2 columns: id and code. id is an auto-incrementing int and code is a varchar. If I do ... $code = sha1($id); ... and then store $code into the same row as $id. Will my code column be unique as well? What about if I append the current time? eg: $code = sha1($id . time()); Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Tutorials for .NET database app using SQLite

    - by ChrisC
    I have some MS Access experience, and had a class on console c++ apps, now I am trying to develop my first program. It's a little C# db app. I have the db tables and columns planned and keyed into VS, but that's where I'm stuck. I'm needing C#/VS tutorials that will guide me on configuring relationships, datatyping, etc, on the db so I can get it ready for testing of the schema. The only tutorials I've been able to find either talk about general db basics (ie, not helping me with VS/C#), or about C# communications with an existing SQL db. Thank you. (In case it matters, I'm using the open source System.Data.SQLite (sqlite.phxsoftware.com) for the db. I chose it over SQL Server CE after seeing a comparison between the two. Also I wanted a server-less version of SQL because this little app will be on other people's computers and I want to to do as little support as possible.)

    Read the article

  • [Cocoa] NSTableView bound to NSArrayController

    - by ndg
    Within Interface Builder I've got an NSTableView with two columns bound to a vanilla NSArrayController. The NSArrayController has its Content Array bound to an NSMutableArray in my application delegate. I've used further bindings to setup the addition and removal of rows via bindings (magic!). The issue I'm running into now is that I'd like to grab the currently selected NSTableView row and use its index to look-up the object stored in my NSArrayControllers associated array. The problem I'm running into is trying to access the NSTableView. Within my application delegate, using the following code will cause my application to crash: NSLog(@"%@", [timersTableView selectedRow]); Similarly, this also causes my application to crash: NSLog(@"%@", [timersController selectionIndex]); Given the simplicity of the code above, I must be doing something fundamentally wrong?

    Read the article

  • Select query 2-3 times faster than view

    - by Richard Knop
    This query run alone: SELECT -- lots of columns FROM (((((((((((`table1` `t1` LEFT JOIN `table2` `t2` ON(( `t2`.`userid` = `t1`.`userid` ))) LEFT JOIN `table3` `t3` ON(( `t1`.`orderid` = `t3`.`orderid` ))) LEFT JOIN `table4` `t4` ON(( `t4`.`orderitemlicenseid` = `t3`.`orderitemlicenseid` ))) LEFT JOIN `table5` `t5` ON(( `t1`.`orderid` = `t5`.`orderid` ))) LEFT JOIN `table6` `t6` ON(( `t5`.`transactionid` = `t6`.`transactionid` ))) LEFT JOIN `table7` `t7` ON(( `t7`.`transactionid` = `t5`.`transactionid` ))) LEFT JOIN `table8` `t8` ON(( `t8`.`voucherid` = `t7`.`voucherid` ))) LEFT JOIN `table9` `t9` ON(( `t8`.`voucherid` = `t9`.`voucherid` ))) LEFT JOIN `table10` `t10` ON(( ( `t10`.`vouchergroupid` = `t9`.`vouchergroupid` ) AND ( `t2`.`territoryid` = `t10`.`territoryid` ) ))) LEFT JOIN `table11` `t11` ON(( `t11`.`voucherid` = `t8`.`voucherid` ))) LEFT JOIN `table12` `t12` ON(( `t12`.`orderid` = `t1`.`orderid` ))) GROUP BY `t5`.`transactionid` Takes about 2.5 seconds to finish. When I save it to a view and run it as: SELECT * FROM viewName; It takes 7 seconds to finish. What is the reason and how can I make the view faster?

    Read the article

  • how to do this in shell

    - by user150674
    I have a very large file, named 'ColCheckMe', tab-delimited, that you are asked to process. You are told that each line in 'ColCheckMe' has 7 columns, and that the values in the 5th column are integers. Using shell functions indicate how you would verify that these conditions are satisfied in 'ColCheckMe' if In the same file, each value in column 1 is unique. How would I verify that? Also how to write a shell function that counts the number of occurrences of the word “SpecStr” in the file 'ColCheckMe' I tried the first part which checks for the valid number of field and checks the 5th field being integer field. nawk ' NF != 7 { printf("[%d] has invalid [%d] number of fields\n", FNR, NF) } $5 !~ /^[0-9]+$/ { printf("[%d] 5th field is invalid [%s]\n", FNR, $5) }' ColCheckMe now i wanna verify in the same file if the value in column 1 is unique. Also is there a way to write a shell function to count the occurrences of the world "SpecStr" in the file 'ColCheckMe' Thanks a lot

    Read the article

  • grouping data from two dataset

    - by Garcia Julien
    hi, i've got a problem with dataset: I've got two dataset from two different server but they have the same columns. so it's like that: First DataSet : asset description make jobtype jan feb ... dec 0001 mine ik Acc 0 0 10 0002 yours ic Over 0 0 10 Second dataset : asset description make jobtype jan feb ... dec 0001 mine ik Acc 10 0 10 0002 yours ic Gen 0 0 0 But i would like to merge the 2 dataset into one like that: asset description make jobtype lhjan imjan lhfeb lhfeb ... lhdec imdec 0001 mine ik Acc 0 10 0 0 10 10 0002 yours ic Over 0 0 0 0 10 0 so all the data from one is combine with the second with the same asset and the same jobtype. I try linq but i can't arrive to make it like i want. I'm working on vb.net framework 3.5. could you help me? Julien

    Read the article

  • Foreign key onto weak entity set in MS SQL Server 2008?

    - by Nic Waller
    I'm using Microsoft SQL Server 2008 Management Studio to create a relational schema by following an Entity-Relationship diagram. (included below; unrelated details removed) Until now, primary and foreign keys have been working as expected. But when I try to create a foreign key from the entity relationship takes onto the weak entity set section, I get an error. Section is identified by a composite primary key in the context of course, which has course_id as a primary key. Therefore, the primary key of section is a 4-way composite key. The entity relationship takes needs to refer to section, so it includes all 4 primary attributes from section in it's own primary key. When trying to establish a foreign key relationship from takes to section, Studio gives the following error: The columns in table 'section' do not match an existing primary key or UNIQUE constraint. Am I doing something wrong, or is this an unsupported configuration? I can provide more details or the SQL schema if necessary.

    Read the article

  • What is so bad about using SQL INNER JOIN

    - by Stephen B. Burris Jr.
    Everytime a database diagram gets looked out, one area people are critical of is inner joins. They look at them hard and has questions to see if an inner join really needs to be there. Simple Library Example: A many-to-many relationship is normally defined in SQL with three tables: Book, Category, BookCategory. In this situation, Category is a table that contains two columns: ID, CategoryName. In this situation, I have gotten questions about the Category table, is it need? Can it be used as a lookup table, and in the BookCategory table store the CategoryName instead of the CategoryID to stop from having to do an additional INNER JOIN. (For this question, we are going to ignore the changing, deleting of any CategoryNames) The question is, what is so bad about inner joins? At what point is doing them a negative thing (general guidelines like # of transactions, # of records, # of joins in a statement, etc)?

    Read the article

  • How to Pass parameter to SQlDataSource from gridview?

    - by user144842
    Gridview has many columns and a Delete button as well. Delete button is a control as TemplateField <asp:TemplateField> <ItemTemplate> <asp:LinkButton ID="btnDelete" CommandName="Delete" Text='<%# Eval("disabled").ToString()=="False" ? "Disabled" : "Enabled" %>' OnClientClick="return confirm('Are you sure you want to take this action?');" runat="server"></asp:LinkButton> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> Now associated SQLDataSource's Delete command's stored procedure is expecting two parameters. One is going from DataKeyNames (RowID), other one i wanna pass is the Text of btnDelete (True or False). How can i achieve it?

    Read the article

  • Database structure - To join or not to join

    - by Industrial
    Hi! We're drawing up the database structure with the help of mySQL Workbench for a new app and the number of joins required to make a listing of the data is increasing drastically as the many-to-many relationships increases. The application will be quite read-heavy and have a couple of hundred thousand rows per table. The questions: Is it really that bad to merge tables where needed and thereby reducing joins? Should we start looking at horizontal partitioning? (in conjunction with merging tables) Is there a better way then pivot tables to take care of many-to-many relationships? We discussed about instead storing all data in serialized text columns and having the application make the sorting instead of the database, but this seems like a very bad idea, even though that the database will be heavily cached. What do you think? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • SPGridView current item in Sharepoint

    - by pistacchio
    Hi, I'm making a custom webpart. I takes some items from a list and display them with a SPGridView. I bound the fields like this: // Grab data from a SP List into dvwTickets SPGridView grdMyTickets = new SPGridView(); grdMyTickets.DataSource = dvwTickets; [..] BoundField colTicketTypology = new BoundField(); colTicketTypology.DataField = "ID"; colTicketTypology.HeaderText = ticketList.Fields.GetFieldByInternalName("ID").Title; grdMyTickets.Columns.Add(colTicketTypology); [..] This works. Now, what a grid does behind the scene when binding data to it is cycling through the binded data. How can I access the "Current Item" to make operations on each item while binding? Thanks

    Read the article

  • DataBinding to ListView

    - by Neir0
    Hi, I have a class public class Foo { public List<string> list1 { get; set;} public List<string> list2 { get; set; } public string url; } and a ListView with two columns <ListView Name="listview" ItemsSource="{Binding}"> <ListView.View> <GridView> <GridViewColumn Header="list1" DisplayMemberBinding="{Binding Path=list1}" /> <GridViewColumn Header="list2" DisplayMemberBinding="{Binding Path=list2}" /> </GridView> </ListView.View> </ListView> How i can to bind instance of Foo class to ListView? Here i set DataContext listview.DataContext = new Foo() { list1 = new[] { "dsfasd", "asdfasdf", "asdf", "asdfasd" }.ToList(), list2 = new[] { "dsfasd", "asdfasdf", "asdf", "asdfasd" }.ToList() }; But it's not work.

    Read the article

  • SP Gridview link button column not working

    - by Dilse Naaz
    Hi I have one sharepoint custom page application which is rendering from a user control. In the user control page, i had used SPGridview for displaying data. My first column is Title Column (link button column), when the user click on the link, then one popup window will open with corresponding data. But the problem is the link button is not working properly. But this application is working as fine in asp.net application. My code is shown below.. <asp:UpdatePanel runat="server" ID="UpdatePanel2"> <ContentTemplate> <SharePoint:SPGridView ID="dgApplicationBox" CellPadding="0" Height="100%" runat="server" ForeColor="Black" Font-Size="10px" Font-Names="Verdana" AutoGenerateColumns="False" AllowPaging="True" Width="100%" BorderStyle="None" BorderWidth="0px" PageSize="10" BorderColor="White" BackColor="White" OnRowDataBound="dgApplicationBox_RowDataBound" DataKeyNames="ApplicationID" OnSelectedIndexChanged="dgApplicationBox_SelectedIndexChanged" OnPageIndexChanging="dgApplicationBox_PageIndexChanging" CssClass="ms-listviewtable" AlternatingRowStyle-CssClass="ms-alternating"> <SelectedRowStyle Font-Bold="True" ForeColor="Black" BackColor="#CE5D5A"></SelectedRowStyle> <EditRowStyle Font-Size="10px" Font-Names="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"></EditRowStyle> <HeaderStyle Font-Size="11px" Height="20px" Font-Bold="True" ForeColor="Black" BackColor="#E7E8EC"> </HeaderStyle> <PagerStyle HorizontalAlign="Center" ForeColor="#414E61" Font-Size="5px" Font-Names="arial" Height="10px" BackColor="#EBF3FF"></PagerStyle> <RowStyle /> <Columns> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="Title" HeaderStyle-CssClass="ms-vb"> <ItemTemplate> <asp:LinkButton ID="lbtnSubject" Text='<%# Bind("UDF5") %>' runat="server" OnClick="lbtnSubject_Click"></asp:LinkButton> </ItemTemplate> <HeaderStyle HorizontalAlign="Left" CssClass="ms-vh2" Font-Bold="true" /> <ItemStyle HorizontalAlign="Left" CssClass="ms-vb2" /> </asp:TemplateField> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="Request No."> <ItemTemplate> <asp:Label ID="lblReqNo" Text='<%# Bind("UDF1") %>' runat="server" /> </ItemTemplate> <HeaderStyle HorizontalAlign="Left" CssClass="ms-vh2" Font-Bold="true" /> <ItemStyle HorizontalAlign="Left" CssClass="ms-vb2" /> </asp:TemplateField> <asp:BoundField DataField="CreatedOn" HeaderText="Created On" DataFormatString="{0:MM/dd/yyyy}" HeaderStyle-HorizontalAlign="Left" ItemStyle-HorizontalAlign="Left"> <HeaderStyle CssClass="ms-vh2" Font-Bold="true"></HeaderStyle> <ItemStyle CssClass="ms-vb2"></ItemStyle> </asp:BoundField> <asp:BoundField DataField="Name" HeaderText="Form Type" HeaderStyle-HorizontalAlign="Left" ItemStyle-HorizontalAlign="Left"> <HeaderStyle CssClass="ms-vh2" Font-Bold="true"></HeaderStyle> <ItemStyle CssClass="ms-vb2"></ItemStyle> </asp:BoundField> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="History"> <HeaderStyle CssClass="ms-vh2" Font-Bold="true"></HeaderStyle> <ItemStyle HorizontalAlign="Center" VerticalAlign="Middle" Width="21px" CssClass="ms-vb2"> </ItemStyle> <ItemTemplate> <asp:LinkButton ID="lbtnView" runat="server" OnClick="lbtnView_Click" >View</asp:LinkButton> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="Application Id" Visible="False"> <ItemTemplate> <asp:Label ID="lblApplicationId" runat="server" Text='<%# Bind("ApplicationId") %>'></asp:Label> </ItemTemplate> <HeaderStyle HorizontalAlign="Left" CssClass="ms-vh2" Font-Bold="true" /> <ItemStyle HorizontalAlign="Left" CssClass="ms-vb2" /> </asp:TemplateField> </Columns> </SharePoint:SPGridView> </ContentTemplate> </asp:UpdatePanel> when the user click on the link button, this code will works.. try { clearSession(); Session["DigitalSignature"] = null; Button btnDetails = sender as Button; DataTable dt = (DataTable)dgApplicationBox.DataSource; GridViewRow gvRow = (GridViewRow)(sender as LinkButton).Parent.Parent; Session["AppId"] = ((Label)gvRow.FindControl("lblApplicationId")).Text; string subject = ((LinkButton)gvRow.FindControl("lbtnSubject")).Text; WFInfo objWFInfo = new WFInfo(); objWFInfo.InitWorkflowProperty(Convert.ToInt32(Session["AppId"].ToString()), Session["CurrentUser"].ToString()); Session["FormId"] = objWFInfo.FormID.ToString(); string strFilname = objWFInfo.GetFormName(objWFInfo.ApplicationCategoryID.ToString()); string WindowName = strFilname; strFilname += ".aspx"; Session["CategoryId"] = objWFInfo.ApplicationCategoryID.ToString(); //pnlSubmitModal_ModalPopupExtender.Show(); ScriptManager.RegisterStartupScript(this, this.GetType(), "starScript", "popUpWindow('" + strFilname + "?tittle=" + subject + "', 800, 690,'" + WindowName + "');", true); this.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl("<script>alert('hi');</script>")); if (Session["CurrentUser"] != null) { ApplicationForm objApplication = new ApplicationForm(); objApplication.markRead(Convert.ToInt32(Session["AppId"].ToString()), Session["CurrentUser"].ToString()); } bindFolderData(); } If i click on the link button, there will be only post back occuring. but not the popup window open.. Please help me for resolving this problem. thanks in advance..

    Read the article

  • best way to store 1:1 user relationships in relational database

    - by aharon
    What is the best way to store user relationships, e.g. friendships, that must be bidirectional (you're my friend, thus I'm your friend) in a rel. database, e.g. MYSql? I can think of two ways: Everytime a user friends another user, I'd add two rows to a database, row A consisting of the user id of the innitiating user followed by the UID of the accepting user in the next column. Row B would be the reverse. You'd only add one row, UID(initiating user) followed by UID(accepting user); and then just search through both columns when trying to figure out whether user 1 is a friend of user 2. Surely there is something better?

    Read the article

  • Convert a Mysql database from latin to UTF-8

    - by Matthieu
    I am converting a website from ISO to UTF-8, so I need to convert the Mysql database too. On internet, I read various solutions, I don't know wich one to choose. Do I really need to convert my varchar columns to binary, then to utf8 like that : ALTER TABLE t MODIFY col BINARY(150); ALTER TABLE t MODIFY col CHAR(150) CHARACTER SET utf8; This is long to do that for each column, of each table, of each database. I have 10 database, wich 20 tables each, wich around 2 - 3 varchar colums (2 queries each column), this gives me around 1000 queries to write ! How come ? How to do ?

    Read the article

  • Ordered many-to-many relationship in NHibernate

    - by Kristoffer
    Let's say I have two classes: Item and ItemCollection, where ItemCollection contains an ordered list of Item objects with an index, i.e. the list is ordered in a way specified by the user. Let's also say that they have a many-to-many relationship, an ItemCollection can contain many items and an Item can belong to several ItemCollections. That would, in my head, require three tables in the database. One for Item, one for ItemCollection and one for the ordered mapping. The mapping table would contain three columns: int ItemID int ItemCollectionID int ListIndex QUESTION: How would you design the ItemCollection class? Should the list of Item objects be a list, dictionary or other? What would the NHibernate mapping look like to get the ListIndex into the picture?

    Read the article

  • Changing database structure at runtime with Entity Framework?

    - by Teddy
    Hi. I have to write a solution that uses different databases with different structure from the same code. So, when a user logs to the application I determine to which database he/she is connected to at runtime. The user can create tables and columns at any time and they have to see the change on the fly. The reason that I use one and the same code the information is manipulates the same way for the different databases. How can I accomplish this at runtime? Actually is the Entity Framework a good solution for my problem? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173  | Next Page >