Search Results

Search found 37001 results on 1481 pages for 'facebook access token'.

Page 167/1481 | < Previous Page | 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174  | Next Page >

• Not able to access to CVS repositories from remote computer

  - by thetna

  Hi, I could not access the CVS repositories which has the link as : ~project/directory/to/of/cvs/project I would like to access it from remote computer.What can be the suitable command to access it?

  Read the article

• Offer access to a private page without login

  - by dccarmo

  So I've been struggling with a nice and easy way to allow users to access a private page without asking them to fill out a login/password form. What I'm thinking about using right now is for each private page I generate a uniqueid (using php uniqid function) and then send the URI to the user. He would access his private page as "www.mywebsite.com/private_page/13ffa2c4a". I think it's relatively safe and user friendly, without asking too much of information. I thought maybe when the user access this page it would ask for it's e-mail just to be sure, but the best would be nothing at all. Is this really safe? I mean not internet banking safe, but enough for a simple access? Do you think there's a better solution? Thanks. :)

  Read the article

• ActionScript 3 - access variables in main application class from instantiated class

  - by Herter

  I have a initApp.as which instantiates a class which needs to access the "currentState" property and the States array as well. However we cannot get this to work as we cannot see how we can access this information. Within initApp.as currentState is accessed via "this.currentState". This does not work in the class which is instatiated within initApp.as. The following error is thrown: "Access of undefined property currentState." Anyone know how this can be solved?

  Read the article

• Unauthorized Access Exception using Web Deploy to Site when the site root is a UNC path

  - by Peter LaComb Jr.

  I am trying to use Web Deploy to deploy a site where the Site is rooted on a UNC path instead of a local drive. This is because I want to have a shared configuration, and have all servers point to the same UNC for content. That would allow me to deploy to one server and have all servers updated at the same time. I've created a share with everyone and users read/write. The NTFS permissions have the ID of the appDomain account as full control, and that is the same account that is configured as the specific user in Management Service Delegation. I can log on to the destination server as that ID, access the share and create/delete files. However, I'm getting the following exception in my Microsoft Web Deploy log on the destination server: User: Client IP: 192.168.62.174 Content-Type: application/msdeploy Version: 9.0.0.0 MSDeploy.VersionMin: 7.1.600.0 MSDeploy.VersionMax: 9.0.1631.0 MSDeploy.Method: Sync MSDeploy.RequestId: c060c823-cdb4-4abe-8294-5ffbdc327d2e MSDeploy.RequestCulture: en-US MSDeploy.RequestUICulture: en-US ServerVersion: 9.0.1631.0 Skip: objectName="^configProtectedData$" Provider: auto, Path: A tracing deployment agent exception occurred that was propagated to the client. Request ID 'c060c823-cdb4-4abe-8294-5ffbdc327d2e'. Request Timestamp: '8/23/2012 11:01:56 AM'. Error Details: ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_TO_SITE_FOLDER Microsoft.Web.Deployment.DeploymentDetailedUnauthorizedAccessException: Unable to perform the operation ("Create Directory") for the specified directory ("\someserver.mydomain.local\sharename\sitename\applicationName"). This can occur if the server administrator has not authorized this operation for the user credentials you are using. Learn more at: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=221672#ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_TO_SITE_FOLDER. --- Microsoft.Web.Deployment.DeploymentException: The error code was 0x80070005. --- System.UnauthorizedAccessException: Access to the path '\someserver.mydomain.local\sharename\sitename\applicationName' is denied. at Microsoft.Web.Deployment.NativeMethods.RaiseIOExceptionFromErrorCode(Win32ErrorCode errorCode, String maybeFullPath) at Microsoft.Web.Deployment.DirectoryEx.CreateDirectory(String path) at Microsoft.Web.Deployment.DirPathProviderBase.CreateDirectory(String fullPath, DeploymentObject source) at Microsoft.Web.Deployment.DirPathProviderBase.Add(DeploymentObject source, Boolean whatIf) --- End of inner exception stack trace --- --- End of inner exception stack trace --- at Microsoft.Web.Deployment.FilePathProviderBase.HandleKnownRetryableExceptions(DeploymentBaseContext baseContext, Int32[] errorsToIgnore, Exception e, String path, String operation) at Microsoft.Web.Deployment.DirPathProviderBase.Add(DeploymentObject source, Boolean whatIf) at Microsoft.Web.Deployment.DeploymentObject.Add(DeploymentObject source, DeploymentSyncContext syncContext) at Microsoft.Web.Deployment.DeploymentSyncContext.HandleAdd(DeploymentObject destObject, DeploymentObject sourceObject) at Microsoft.Web.Deployment.DeploymentSyncContext.HandleUpdate(DeploymentObject destObject, DeploymentObject sourceObject) at Microsoft.Web.Deployment.DeploymentSyncContext.SyncChildrenNoOrder(DeploymentObject dest, DeploymentObject source) at Microsoft.Web.Deployment.DeploymentSyncContext.SyncChildrenNoOrder(DeploymentObject dest, DeploymentObject source) at Microsoft.Web.Deployment.DeploymentSyncContext.SyncChildrenOrder(DeploymentObject dest, DeploymentObject source) at Microsoft.Web.Deployment.DeploymentSyncContext.ProcessSync(DeploymentObject destinationObject, DeploymentObject sourceObject) at Microsoft.Web.Deployment.DeploymentObject.SyncToInternal(DeploymentObject destObject, DeploymentSyncOptions syncOptions, PayloadTable payloadTable, ContentRootTable contentRootTable, Nullable1 syncPassId) at Microsoft.Web.Deployment.DeploymentAgent.HandleSync(DeploymentAgentAsyncData asyncData, Nullable1 passId) at Microsoft.Web.Deployment.DeploymentAgent.HandleRequestWorker(DeploymentAgentAsyncData asyncData) at Microsoft.Web.Deployment.DeploymentAgent.HandleRequest(DeploymentAgentAsyncData asyncData) This is shown as the following on the console of the machine where I run the deployment: C:\Users\PLaComb"C:\Program Files (x86)\IIS\Microsoft Web Deploy V3\msdeploy.exe" -source:package='C:\Packages\Deployments\applicationName.zip' -dest:auto,computerName='https://SERVERNAME:8172/msdeploy.axd',includeAcls='True' -verb:sync -disableLink:AppPoolExtension -disableLink:ContentExtension -disableLink:CertificateExtension -setParamFile:"C:\Packages\Deployments\applicationName.SetParameters.xml" -allowUntrusted Info: Using ID 'c060c823-cdb4-4abe-8294-5ffbdc327d2e' for connections to the remote server. Info: Adding sitemanifest (sitemanifest). Info: Adding virtual path (JMS/admin) Info: Adding directory (JMS/admin). Error Code: ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_TO_SITE_FOLDER More Information: Unable to perform the operation ("Create Directory") for the specified directory ("\someserver.mydomain.local\sharename\sitename\applicationName"). This can occur if the server administrator has not authorized this operation for the user credentials you are using. Learn more at: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=221672#ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_TO_SITE_FOLDER. Error: The error code was 0x80070005. Error: Access to the path '\someserver.mydomain.local\sharename\sitename\applicationName' is denied. Error count: 1.

  Read the article

• Postfix : relay access denied

  - by kfa

  Since I can't find a solution that works with my config, I lean on you guys to help me out with this. I've installed postfix and dovecot on a CentOS server. Everything's running well. But when I try to send an e-mail from Outlook to tld that is not .com, server returns : Relay access denied. Here's the result from the postconf -n command alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases command_directory = /usr/sbin config_directory = /etc/postfix daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix data_directory = /var/lib/postfix debug_peer_level = 2 home_mailbox = Maildir/ html_directory = no inet_protocols = all mailbox_size_limit = 104857600 mailq_path = /usr/bin/mailq.postfix manpage_directory = /usr/share/man message_size_limit = 20971520 mydestination = $myhostname, $mydomain, localhost, localhost.$mydomain newaliases_path = /usr/bin/newaliases.postfix readme_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.6.6/README_FILES sample_directory = /usr/share/doc/postfix-2.6.6/samples sendmail_path = /usr/sbin/sendmail.postfix setgid_group = postdrop smtp_tls_loglevel = 3 smtpd_tls_auth_only = yes smtpd_tls_cert_file = /etc/postfix/mailserver.pem smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/postfix/mailserver.pem smtpd_tls_received_header = yes smtpd_tls_security_level = encrypt smtpd_tls_session_cache_timeout = 3600s tls_random_source = dev:/dev/urandom unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550 Here's the maillog error : Nov 23 13:26:24 website_name postfix/smtpd[16391]: extract_addr: input: <mrm@website_name.com> Nov 23 13:26:24 website_name postfix/smtpd[16391]: smtpd_check_addr: addr=mrm@website_name.com Nov 23 13:26:24 website_name postfix/smtpd[16391]: ctable_locate: move existing entry key mrm@website_name.com Nov 23 13:26:24 website_name postfix/smtpd[16391]: extract_addr: in: <mrm@website_name.com>, result: mrm@website_name.com Nov 23 13:26:24 website_name postfix/smtpd[16391]: fsspace: .: block size 4096, blocks free 23679665 Nov 23 13:26:24 website_name postfix/smtpd[16391]: smtpd_check_queue: blocks 4096 avail 23679665 min_free 0 msg_size_limit 20971520 Nov 23 13:26:24 website_name postfix/smtpd[16391]: > unknown[178.193.xxx.xxx]: 250 2.1.0 Ok Nov 23 13:26:24 website_name postfix/smtpd[16391]: < unknown[178.193.xxx.xxx]: RCPT TO:<[email protected]> Nov 23 13:26:24 website_name postfix/smtpd[16391]: extract_addr: input: <[email protected]> Nov 23 13:26:24 website_name postfix/smtpd[16391]: smtpd_check_addr: [email protected] Nov 23 13:26:24 website_name postfix/smtpd[16391]: ctable_locate: move existing entry key [email protected] Nov 23 13:26:24 website_name postfix/smtpd[16391]: extract_addr: in: <[email protected]>, result: [email protected] Nov 23 13:26:24 website_name postfix/smtpd[16391]: >>> START Recipient address RESTRICTIONS <<< Nov 23 13:26:24 website_name postfix/smtpd[16391]: generic_checks: name=permit_sasl_authenticated Nov 23 13:26:24 website_name postfix/smtpd[16391]: generic_checks: name=permit_sasl_authenticated status=0 Nov 23 13:26:24 website_name postfix/smtpd[16391]: generic_checks: name=reject_unauth_destination Nov 23 13:26:24 website_name postfix/smtpd[16391]: reject_unauth_destination: [email protected] Nov 23 13:26:24 website_name postfix/smtpd[16391]: permit_auth_destination: [email protected] Nov 23 13:26:24 website_name postfix/smtpd[16391]: ctable_locate: leave existing entry key [email protected] Nov 23 13:26:24 website_name postfix/smtpd[16391]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[178.193.xxx.xxx]: 554 5.7.1 <[email protected]>: Relay access denied; from=<mrm@website_name.com> to=<[email protected]> proto=ESMTP helo=<[192.168.1.38]> Nov 23 13:26:24 website_name postfix/smtpd[16391]: generic_checks: name=reject_unauth_destination status=2 Nov 23 13:26:24 website_name postfix/smtpd[16391]: > unknown[178.193.xxx.xxx]: 554 5.7.1 <[email protected]>: Relay access denied Nov 23 13:26:24 website_name postfix/smtpd[16391]: smtp_get: EOF What's wrong with this? UPDATE : added to main.cf broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks permit_sasl_authenticated smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes smtpd_sasl_path = private/auth smtpd_sasl_security_options = noanonymous noplaintext smtpd_sasl_tls_security_options = $smtpd_sasl_security_options smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot UPDATE : EHLO EHLO mail.perflux.com 250-perflux.com 250-PIPELINING 250-SIZE 20971520 250-VRFY 250-ETRN 250-STARTTLS 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-8BITMIME 250 DSN

  Read the article

• Diaspora se pose comme solution libre face à Facebook, le réseau social aGPL et décentralisé a-t-il

  Diaspora se pose comme solution libre face à Facebook, le réseau social aGPL et décentralisé a-t-il une chance de succès ? Google n'est pas le seul à se faire des ennemis parmi les organisations européennes. Facebook est également dans leur ligne de mire avec sa politique "inacceptable" concernant la protection de la vie privée de ses utilisateurs. Le 12 mai, le groupe de travail 29 (du numéro de l'article concerné) de l'Union européenne -chargé de la protection des données personnelles- a publié une lettre ouverte qui attaque violemment le leader des réseaux sociaux (plus de 450 millions de membres dont 15 millions en France) en lui reprochant de monétiser les données qu'on lui confie (en laissant les moteurs de recherch...

  Read the article

• Qu'est-ce qu'une entreprise IT où il fait "bon vivre" ? Facebook arrive en tête du classement Glassdoor

  Qu'est-ce qu'une entreprise IT où il fait "bon vivre" ? Facebook arrive en tête du classement Glassdoor pour sa bonne ambiance de travail Le classement annuel Glassdoor sanctionne les compagnies informatiques où il fait bon travailler aux Etats-Unis (grâce à un questionnaire rempli par les travailleurs qui le souhaitent). Depuis plusieurs éditions, la première place revenait invariablement à Google, dont les salariés semblaient particulièrement épanouis (possibilité de venir au travail avec son chien, salle de détente et de sport sur le campus, aménagement d'équipements de confort, etc.). Mais, en 2010, Facebook est passé en tête. Les retours positifs de ses employés lui ont permis de prendre le pas sur son plus grand riv...

  Read the article

• Les entreprises informatiques devront-elles toutes faire dans le social pour survivre ? Microsoft a proposé 15 $ milliards à Facebook

  Les grandes entreprises informatiques devront-elles toutes faire dans le social pour survivre ? Microsoft a tenté de racheter Facebook pour 15 milliards de dollars Facebook, leader incontesté des réseaux sociaux avec plus de 520 millions de membres, est maintenant l'un des sites web les plus importants au monde, si ce n'est "le" plus important d'après certains. Google va s'y mettre aussi, puisque la firme est en plein développement de son interface communautaire Google Me. Partout sur le Net, les ajouts participatifs fleurissent. Et, on vient de l'apprendre, Microsoft à tenté de racheter l'entreprise de Mark Zuckerberg. En effet, Steve Ballmer a approché le plus jeune milliarda...

  Read the article

• Forte croissance des utilisateurs de l'application Facebook Windows Phone, près de 600 000 terminaux sous l'OS vendus en deux semaines

  Forte croissance des utilisateurs de l'application Facebook Windows Phone près de 600 000 nouveaux terminaux sous l'OS vendus en deux semaines Les ventes des terminaux sous le système d'exploitation mobile de Microsoft Windows Phone semblent être sur la bonne voie. En effet, selon le site WMPowerUser, le nombre d'utilisateurs par mois de l'application Microsoft Windows Phone Facebook aurait augmenté de près de 100 000 en seulement deux semaines. Le nombre d'utilisateurs actifs par mois serait passé de 1 000 000 le 11 novembre à 1 100 000 le 25 novembre. [IMG]http://wmpoweruser.speedymirror.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/wp7fbusers.jpg?9d7bd4[/IMG] Ces chiffres bas...

  Read the article

• Les entreprises informatiques vont-elles toutes investir dans les réseaux sociaux ? Microsoft a proposé 15 $ milliards à Facebook

  Les grandes entreprises informatiques vont-elles toutes investir dans les réseaux sociaux ? Microsoft a tenté de racheter Facebook pour 15 milliards de dollars Facebook, leader incontesté des réseaux sociaux avec plus de 520 millions de membres, est maintenant l'un des sites web les plus importants au monde, si ce n'est "le" plus important d'après certains. Google va s'y mettre aussi, puisque la firme est en plein développement de son interface communautaire Google Me. Partout sur le Net, les ajouts participatifs fleurissent. Et, on vient de l'apprendre, Microsoft à tenté de racheter l'entreprise de Mark Zuckerberg. En effet, Steve Ballmer a approché le plus jeune milliardaire ...

  Read the article

• 1,5 million de comptes Facebook en vente, un pirate russe fait le bonheur des réseaux de phishing

  1,5 million de comptes Facebook en vente, un pirate russe fait le bonheur des réseaux de phishing «Kirllos», un hacker russe, vient de mettre en vente 1.5 million de comptes Facebook sur un forum est-européen. Et, période de soldes oblige, il propose des prix de gros avec des tarifs attractifs : 25 dollars les 1.000 comptes avec moins de 10 amis, 45 dollars les 1.000 avec plus de 10 contacts. Il est vraisemblable que les "utilisateurs" avec très peu ou pas de contacts aient été crées par ses soins, et les autres compromis avec un vol de mot de passe. Le pirate semble agir seul, mais les spécialistes se penchant sur le cas n'excluent pas qu'il puisse n'être qu'un intermédiaire. Quant aux clients se ruant sur...

  Read the article

• Facebook rend open source Ringmark, sa suite de tests pour applications Web mobiles, plus de 400 tests disponibles

  Facebook rend open source Ringmark sa suite de tests pour applications Web mobiles, plus de 400 tests disponibles Facebook a publié sous une licence open source le code de Ringmark, une suite de tests pour les navigateurs mobiles pour la création d'applications mobiles Web. Ringmark avait été présenté pour la première fois il y a quelques semaines lors de l'événement Mobile World Congres de Barcelone. L'outil est conçu pour fournir aux développeurs des fonctionnalités de tests de base qu'ils ont besoin pour construire des applications Web mobiles conformes aux standards. La suite de tests va aider ceux-ci à mieux comprendre comment les navigateurs mobiles prennent en charge...

  Read the article

• MemSQL : un SGBD résidant en mémoire, 30 fois plus rapide que les systèmes existants, développé par des anciens de Facebook

  MemSQL : un SGBD résidant en mémoire 30 fois plus rapide que les systèmes existants, développé par des anciens de Facebook Deux anciens développeurs de Facebook ont créé un nouveau gestionnaire de bases de données qui serait, selon ceux-ci, le plus rapide du monde. Baptisé MemSQL, le système s'appuie essentiellement sur le stockage des données en mémoire afin de réduire le temps de latence en évitant les lectures et écritures sur les disques durs. Cette caractéristique permet au SGBD d'après ses créateurs, d'être 30 fois plus rapide que les SGBD standards. Une vidéo de présentation a été publiée par ses auteurs, fournissant une démonstration des performances de MemSQL par rapport ...

  Read the article

• Site Suspended -message at my site and Facebook fan page? [on hold]

  - by Jere_Sumell

  I'm writing blog at Wordpress, and bought Domain park for it for a shorter web address for my readers who I redirect to my blog. Yesterday there was a first time message titled "Account Suspended due to registration information verification failure". I've never changed my contact information at my Web Host, and my contact Information has not been changed. I have Fan page on Facebook too, that my readers' could follow my blog easier, and there was same kind of message on my Facebook site too. Can you tell me, what's going on? I've not been broking any terms of use at my host, and writing good language on my blog. I think it's a some kind of hacker -thing? Is there nothing else to do than contact my web host that they can fix the problem? Can they? I Contacted last night my host, but got no answer yet.

  Read the article

• MS NPS denying access, can't validate server certificate

  - by Fred Weston

  At my office we use a Cisco WLC2504 wireless controller and starting about a week ago we started having problems with users connecting to one of our secure wireless network. We are running AD on Windows Server 2008 R2 and use network policy server to control access to our wireless network. When I look at the logs in event viewer after a failed connection attempt I see an access reject message: Reason Code: 262 Reason: The supplied message is incomplete. The signature was not verified. Looking this up on Google I found this article: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/838502 I tried disabling server certificate validation on my computer and as soon as I did that I was able to connect to the network, so it seems that there is some sort of certificate validation issue. I'm not sure which certificate is unable to be validated or how to fix it. This used to work and stopped suddenly by itself so I am thinking a certificate may have expired. When I go to NPS Policies Network Policies My policy Constraints Auth methods Microsoft PEAP and view the properties, the certificae specified here expires in 2016, so doesn't seem as though this could be the problem. Any suggestions on how to troubleshoot this issue?

  Read the article

• Windows Server Backup fails to backup Hyper-V VM with "Access is denied"

  - by Sebastian Krysmanski

  I'm trying to use Windows Server Backup on my Windows Server 2012 box to backup my Hyper-V VMs. I created a backup job but each job ends with some "Access is denied" errors. One of my VMs (Linux Server) is backed up properly. All others (one Windows 8, one Linux) are not (or at least it seems that way from the looks of the log file below). How can I solve this problem? Here's the log I'm getting: Error in backup of D:\ during read: Error [0x80070005] Access is denied. Application backup Writer Id: {66841CD4-6DED-4F4B-8F17-FD23F8DDC3DE} Component: C435964E-C07A-4958-BA73-A04C6583280F Caption : Backup Using Saved State\Alter Server Logical Path: Error : 8078010E Error Message : Copy of the files failed. Detailed Error : 80070005 Detailed Error Message : (null) Writer Id: {66841CD4-6DED-4F4B-8F17-FD23F8DDC3DE} Component: E780F138-9676-42FB-821C-4561B9B263DC Caption : Backup Using Child Partition Snapshot\Windows 8 Logical Path: Error : 8078010E Error Message : Copy of the files failed. Detailed Error : 80070005 Detailed Error Message : (null) Writer Id: {66841CD4-6DED-4F4B-8F17-FD23F8DDC3DE} Component: Host Component Caption : Host Component Logical Path: Error : 8078010E Error Message : Copy of the files failed. Detailed Error : 80070005 Detailed Error Message : (null)

  Read the article

• Can't access SQL Server 2008 from workstations, but can from server

  - by Kev

  We have an app that can use mssql2k or 2k8. We've been using 2k but I decided to try 2k8 to compare. I installed in on our win2k3 server alongside mssql2k. In the ODBC applet on the server, I was able to set up access to 2k8, and it passes the test at the end successfully, whether I tell it to use Windows Authentication or an sql login. The latter is how the app always accessed mssql2k. The app works fine from the server, but when I try it on a workstation (winxpsp3), I get a window titled, "Microsoft SQL Server Login" that says: Connection failed: SQLState: '01000' SQL Server Error: 53 [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][DBNETLIB]ConnectionOpen (Connect()). Connection failed: SQLState: '08001' SQL Server ERror: 17 [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][DBNETLIB]SQL Server does not exist or access denied. Then I get the ODBC login dialog, which I can't get to login correctly (I just keep getting the same error above), even copying and pasting a password after resetting it on the server, and whether "trusted" is checked or not. "Options" is disabled. The server was straight SERVERNAME for mssql2k, but for mssql2k8 it's called SERVERNAME\mssql2008. That works on the server, why not on the workstation? (Which I'm logged in as the same person on, BTW.)

  Read the article

• IIS 7 - 403 Access Denied error on wwwroot

  - by cparker4486

  Hi, I'm trying to setup a redirect from http://mail.mydomain.com to https://mail.mydomain.com/owa. I've been unsuccessful in doing this by using IIS's HTTP Redirect so I looked to other options. The one I settled on is to create a default document in the wwwroot folder to handle the redirect. I created a file called index.aspx (and added index.aspx to the list of default documents) and put the following code in it: <script runat="server"> private void Page_Load(object sender, System.EventArgs e) { Response.Status = "301 Moved Permanently"; Response.AddHeader("Location","https://mail.mydomain.com/owa"); } </script> Instead of getting a redirect I get: 403 - Forbidden: Access is denied. You do not have permission to view this directory or page using the credentials that you supplied. I've been trying to find an answer to this but have been unsuccessful so far. One thing I did try was to add the Everyone group to wwwroot with read access. No change. The AppPool for Default Web Site is DefaultAppPool and the Identity is ApplicationPoolIdentity. (I don't know what these things are but maybe knowing this will help you.) Thanks!

  Read the article

• User cannot access a system DSN on Windows Server 2008

  - by Ra Osolage

  We run our SQL Server services using a low privileged domain account. That account is NOT a local admin on the OS. Only access I give the user account is assigned during install of SQL: full control over its mount points and then everything else is granted by the SQL Server 2005/2008 installer. I need to create a linked server in SQL Server 2008 to an ODBC data source. So I remoted into the computer using my domain account, which is part of a group that DOES have local admin privs to the OS. I created a system DSN and configured it to connect to another SQL Server. The DSN works perfectly when I test it. However, when I try to create the linked server, I get an error. It appears to me that the DSN is invisible to the domain account that SQL Server is running as. It seems that this problem is only happening to me on Windows 2008 servers. Does anybody know whether there's anything that you need to do after creating a DSN to make it visible for other users to access?

  Read the article

• Why can’t two programs access my webcam simultaneously?

  - by qdii

  I first launch cheese and my webcam turns on. I then run vlc to grab the output of /dev/video0 but it fails with: [0x7f3ea40012e8] v4l2 demux error: cannot set input 0: Device or resource busy [0x7f3ea40012e8] v4l2 demux error: cannot set input 0: Device or resource busy [0x7f3ea4002168] v4l2 access error: cannot set input 0: Device or resource busy [0x7f3ea4002168] v4l2 access error: cannot set input 0: Device or resource busy [0x7f3eb4000b78] main input error: open of `v4l2:///dev/video0' failed Whatever pair of video programs I run (skype, cheese, vlc, etc.), the result is always the same: the second program can no longer use the webcam when the first one has already grabbed the output. However I find it curious as video4linux states: In general, V4L2 devices can be opened more than once. When this is supported by the driver, users can for example start a "panel" application to change controls like brightness or audio volume, while another application captures video and audio. My webcam is seen in lspci as 058f:a014 Alcor Micro Corp. Asus Integrated Webcam, but I don’t even know what the underlying driver is, so I can’t check whether my problem is driver-related or not. Any input would be more than welcome!

  Read the article

• Preventing access to files if a user types the full url on the address bar

  - by bogha

  i have a website, some folders on the websites contains images and files like .pdf , .doc and .docx . the user can easly just type the address in the url to get the file or display the photo http://site/folder1/img/pic1.jpg then boom.. he can see the image or just download the file my question is: how to prevent this kind of action, how can i guarantee a secure access of the files. any suggestions UPDATE TO CLARIFY MY IDEA i don't want any user who is browsing the website to get access to these files normally by just writing the URL of the file. those files are a CV files, they are being uploaded by the users to a specific folder on the server which we host outside the company. those files are only being viewed by the HR people through a special system. that's the scenario we want. i don't want a WEB GEEK who just wants to see what files has been uploaded to this folder to download them easly to his/her computer and view them or publish them on the internet. i hope you got my idea

  Read the article

• VMWare Fusion: "No Permission to access this virtual machine"

  - by Craig Walker

  I had a VMWare Fusion VM backed up on my home network file server (Ubuntu). I wanted to run it again, so I copied it back to my Macbook. When I tried to launch it in VMWare, I got an error message: No permission to access this virtual machine. Configuration file: /Users/craig/WinXP Clean + Scanner.vmwarevm/WinXP Pro Test.vmx The permissions look fine to me: The bundle directory is 777 The bundle files (including the listed .vmx) are all 666 User is craig (my current user); group is staff. I changed the group to wheel at the suggestion of this page, but that didn't help. Finder shows read & write for craig, staff, and everyone on the bundle directory The bundle dir is also not locked Finder also shows rw and unlocked for the .vmx file The parent directory is also rw & unlocked Disk Utility permissions check doesn't show any problems with any of the associated files It sure looks like I should have wide open access to run this VM; why is Fusion complaining?

  Read the article

• Unable to access Windows share

  - by mbnoimi

  I've installed Alfresco 4.2.d under Ubuntu 12.04 LTS; Everything done fine except I can't access it from Windows share although I got the link from Alfresco explorer which is: file:///%5C%5CECSA%5CAlfresco%5CSites%5Cswsdp%5CdocumentLibrary%5CAgency%20Files%5CImages%5Ccoins.JPG I tried to access it from: \\ECSA but I failed too so I made a ping (192.168.0.70 is server IP) then I got: C:\Users\user>ping 192.168.0.70 Pinging 192.168.0.70 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 192.168.0.70: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.0.70: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.0.70: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Reply from 192.168.0.70: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64 Ping statistics for 192.168.0.70: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms C:\Users\user>ping ECSA Ping request could not find host ECSA. Please check the name and try C:\Users\user> Some logs of what's going on: C:\Users\user>net view ECSA System error 1707 has occurred. The network address is invalid. C:\Users\user>nbtstat -a 192.168.0.70 Local Area Connection: Node IpAddress: [192.168.0.84] Scope Id: [] NetBIOS Remote Machine Name Table Name Type Status --------------------------------------------- ECSA <20> UNIQUE Registered ECSA <00> UNIQUE Registered WORKGROUP <00> GROUP Registered MAC Address = 00-00-00-00-00-00 C:\Users\user> CIFS Server Configuration in file-servers.properties ### CIFS Server Configuration - file-servers.properties ### cifs.enabled=true cifs.serverName=${localname}A cifs.domain= cifs.broadcast=255.255.255.255 cifs.bindto=192.168.0.70 cifs.ipv6.enabled=false cifs.hostannounce=true cifs.disableNIO=false cifs.disableNativeCode=false cifs.sessionTimeout=900 cifs.maximumVirtualCircuitsPerSession=16 cifs.tcpipSMB.port=445 cifs.netBIOSSMB.sessionPort=139 cifs.netBIOSSMB.namePort=137 cifs.netBIOSSMB.datagramPort=138 cifs.WINS.autoDetectEnabled=true cifs.WINS.primary=192.168.0.70 cifs.WINS.secondary=192.168.0.1 cifs.sessionDebug= cifs.pseudoFiles.enabled=true cifs.pseudoFiles.explorerURL.enabled=true cifs.pseudoFiles.explorerURL.fileName=__Alfresco.url cifs.pseudoFiles.shareURL.enabled=false cifs.pseudoFiles.shareURL.fileName=__Share.url How can I fix this issue?

  Read the article

• Lock down Wiki access to password only but remain open to a subnet via .htaccess

  - by Treffynnon

  Basically we have a Wiki that has some sensitive information stored in it - not the best I know but my predecessor set it up. I want to be able to request password access from any one who is not on the local network subnet. Those on the local subnet should be able to proceed without entering a password. The following .htaccess does not seem to work any more as it is letting non-local access without requiring the password: AuthName "Our Wiki" AuthType Basic AuthUserFile /path/to/passwd/file AuthGroupFile /dev/null Require valid-user Allow from 192.168 Satisfy Any order deny,allow And I cannot work out why. The WikkaWiki it is supposed to be protecting was recently upgraded, which clobbered the .htaccess file so I restored the above from memory/googling. Maybe I am missing an important directive? The full .htaccess is as follows: AuthName "Our Wiki" AuthType Basic AuthUserFile /path/to/passwd/file AuthGroupFile /dev/null Require valid-user Allow from 192.168 Satisfy Any SetEnvIfNoCase Referer ".*($LIST_OF_ADULT_WORDS).*" BadReferrer order deny,allow deny from env=BadReferrer <IfModule mod_rewrite.c> # turn on rewrite engine RewriteEngine on RewriteBase / # if request is a directory, make sure it ends with a slash RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} -d RewriteRule ^(.*/[^/]+)$ $1/ # if not rewritten before, AND requested file is wikka.php # turn request into a query for a default (unspecified) page RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} !wakka= RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} wikka.php RewriteRule ^(.*)$ wikka.php?wakka= [QSA,L] # if not rewritten before, AND requested file is a page name # turn request into a query for that page name for wikka.php RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} !wakka= RewriteRule ^(.*)$ wikka.php?wakka=$1 [QSA,L] </IfModule>

  Read the article

• Error message: do not have authority to access this function

  - by Ross

  Hi. I just reinstalled Windows on my computer after getting a virus. I worked with it for a while and everything worked as it should. I then used a backup of the computer that I had made a week or so earlier and copied the backup over my user folder. (That is, I took the folder named "Joe" from the backup drive and copied-replaced the whole thing over the folder named "Joe" on the new Windows install.) To do this I had to work from an Ubuntu live CD because some of the files were in use. Now the problem: After I did this copying my computer says that I have no authority. Anytime I try to access anything that is part of the operating system (Explorer, Personalize, Control Panel, etc) I get an error message that says I don't have the authority to do this. I am able to access things that aren't part of the OS: Chrome, Firefox, my accounting software, Rockbox, but nothing that is part of the OS. I only copied over the User file, so I didn't mess with the registry or anything, so I have no idea why this should be. Does anyone out in cyberspace have any idea? Thank you.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174  | Next Page >