Search Results

Search found 9318 results on 373 pages for 'django authentication'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 168/373 | < Previous Page | 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175  | Next Page >

  • Pros & Cons of separating the controllers using subfolders on an ruby on rails app based?

    - by user293179
    Hi, Need some help gathering thoughts on this issue. Our team is moving ahead with the idea that separating the authenticated and public sections of our app in two separate folders will allow us to be more organized and secured. I have seen this approach for Admin apps within the site but never for authentication. We are currently using Authlogic. What would be the disadvantage of this? Thanks for your help.

    Read the article

  • Credentials - Can I do this?

    - by zburns
    I've got an ASP.NET website that I use forms authentication using the default provider you can setup. This works just fine for the site. The question is can I pass the credentials from the web site to a web app on the same server?

    Read the article

  • Non blocking IO call from Django controller from a Windows service

    - by Anders
    Hi all, I have a CherryPy server with a Django application running as a Windows service, inside a controller I need to make a call to wmic, the problem is, so far I have only been able to implement a blocking operation. Does anyone have any recommendation for a non blocking operation so, at least more then one person at a time can access this controller and extract information from wmic? Thanks in advance, Anders

    Read the article

  • Python directory list returned to Django template

    - by Shu
    Total Python newb here. I have a images directory and I need to return the names and urls of those files to a django template that I can loop through for links. I know it will be the server path, but I can modify it via JS. I've tried os.walk, but I keep getting empty results.

    Read the article

  • App Engine Django Form Uniqueness Validation?

    - by GeekTantra
    Is there a simpler way to use uniqueness validation with Django Forms in AppEngine? I understand that performance would be problem if we keep an uniqueness constraint but since the amount of data being added is very small performance is not a big concern, rather development time is a concern here. Any help is appreciated.

    Read the article

  • How to take advantage of subprocess within Django? - Django

    - by RadiantHex
    Hi folks, I'm currently using os.popen() but have been recommended to use subprocess.popen() instead. Any ideas on how I can integrate this? It would be cool and fun to have a Python shell accessible on a Django app. But I reckon that it might be a bit complex to implement. I guess I would have to retrieve the subprocess, as a new request comes in. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • How can I generate a client proxy for a WCF service with an HTTPS endpoint?

    - by ng5000
    Might be the same issue as this previuos question: WCF Proxy but not sure... I have an HTTPS service connfigured to use transport security and, I hope, Windows credentials. The service is only accessed internally (i.e. within the intranet). The configuration is as follows: <configuration> <system.serviceModel> <services> <service name="WCFTest.CalculatorService" behaviorConfiguration="WCFTest.CalculatorBehavior"> <host> <baseAddresses> <add baseAddress = "https://localhost:8000/WCFTest/CalculatorService/" /> </baseAddresses> </host> <endpoint address ="basicHttpEP" binding="basicHttpBinding" contract="WCFTest.ICalculatorService" bindingConfiguration="basicHttpBindingConfig"/> <endpoint address="mex" binding="mexHttpsBinding" contract="IMetadataExchange"/> </service> </services> <bindings> <basicHttpBinding> <binding name="basicHttpBindingConfig"> <security mode="Transport"> <transport clientCredentialType = "Windows"/> </security> </binding> </basicHttpBinding> </bindings> <behaviors> <serviceBehaviors> <behavior name="WCFTest.CalculatorBehavior"> <serviceAuthorization impersonateCallerForAllOperations="false" principalPermissionMode="UseWindowsGroups" /> <serviceCredentials > <windowsAuthentication allowAnonymousLogons="false" includeWindowsGroups="true" /> </serviceCredentials> <serviceMetadata httpsGetEnabled="True"/> <serviceDebug includeExceptionDetailInFaults="False" /> </behavior> </serviceBehaviors> </behaviors> </system.serviceModel> </configuration> When I run the service I can't see the service in IE. I get a "this page can not be displayed" error. If I try and create a client in VS2008 via the "add service reference" wizard I get this error: There was an error downloading 'https://localhost:8000/WCFTest/CalculatorService/'. There was an error downloading 'https://localhost:8000/WCFTest/CalculatorService/'. The underlying connection was closed: An unexpected error occurred on a send. Authentication failed because the remote party has closed the transport stream. Metadata contains a reference that cannot be resolved: 'https://localhost:8000/WCFTest/CalculatorService/'. An error occurred while making the HTTP request to https://localhost:8000/WCFTest/CalculatorService/. This could be due to the fact that the server certificate is not configured properly with HTTP.SYS in the HTTPS case. This could also be caused by a mismatch of the security binding between the client and the server. The underlying connection was closed: An unexpected error occurred on a send. Authentication failed because the remote party has closed the transport stream. If the service is defined in the current solution, try building the solution and adding the service reference again. I think I'm missing some fundamental basics here. Do I need to set up some certificates? Or should it all just work as it seems to do when I use NetTcpBinding? Thanks

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET Login Page Redirection Problem

    - by Daniel
    Hello everyone! I'm building a silverlight application hosted on ASP.NET Web App. / IIS7 / SSL-enabled website. For security, I put my silverlight page inside a Members folder in the ASP.NET Web Application, and restricted access from anonymous users.(see web.config below) when users try to access pages under Members folder, they get redirected to https://www.ssldemo.com/authenticationtest/login.aspx. (see web.config below) (I've mapped www.ssldemo.com to 127.0.0.1). for security, I'm switching to HTTPS in login.aspx, and back to HTTP after validation. below is the code for login.aspx.cs. protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { LoginControl.LoggedIn += new EventHandler(LoginControl_LoggedIn); } void LoginControl_LoggedIn(object sender, EventArgs e) { //for going to ReturnURL & switching back to HTTP string serverName = HttpUtility.UrlEncode(Request.ServerVariables["SERVER_NAME"]); string returnURL = Request["ReturnURL"]; Response.Redirect(ResolveClientUrl("http://" + serverName + returnURL)); } The problem is, when I deploy another application to http://www.ssldemo.com/authenticationtest/members/AnotherApplication/ and open http://www.ssldemo.com/authenticationtest/members/AnotherApplication/default.aspx, Users get redirected to https://www.ssldemo.com/authenticationtest/login.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fauthenticationtest%2fmembers%2fanotherapplication%2fdefault.aspx. but even when I enter the correct credentials at login page, I get redirected to the same login page again, not to the ReturnUrl. when I looked into fiddler, it said '302 object moved to here.' Thank you for reading! Any input will be much appreciated. <configuration> <connectionStrings> <add name="CompanyDatabase" connectionString="Data Source=192.168.0.2;Initial Catalog=SomeTable;User ID=Username;Password=P@ssword" /> </connectionStrings> <system.web> <compilation debug="true" targetFramework="4.0" /> <authentication mode="Forms"> <forms slidingExpiration="true" timeout="15" loginUrl="https://www.ssldemo.com/authenticationtest/login.aspx" defaultUrl="~/Members/Default.aspx" > </forms> </authentication> <!--Custom Membership Provider--> <membership defaultProvider="MyMembershipProvider" userIsOnlineTimeWindow="15"> <providers> <clear /> <add name="MyMembershipProvider" type="AuthenticationTest.Web.MyMembershipProvider" connectionStringName="CompanyDatabase" applicationName="AuthenticationTest.Web"/> </providers> </membership> </system.web> <!--securing folders--> <location path="Members"> <system.web> <authorization> <deny users="?"/> </authorization> </system.web> </location> </configuration>

    Read the article

  • mobile browsers' can't login to my site

    - by imin
    i've tested my site on 2 phone models using the 'generic' browser that came with the phone, but sadly, everytime I tried to login, it will return me back to my index page. here's my login code <form name='login' method='POST' action='authentication.php'> <table border=0 cellpadding=2> <tr><td>Login:</td><td></td></tr> <tr><td>E-mail: </td><td><input type=text name='email' id='email' size=20 maxlength="200"></td></tr> <tr><td>Password: </td><td><input type=password name='password' id='password' size=20 maxlength="100"></td></tr> <tr><td></td><td><input type=submit value='Login'></td></tr> </table></form> and here's the authentication.php (snippet) $currentUserEmail = $_POST["email"]; $currentUserPwd = md5($_POST["password"]); $stmt = $dbi->prepare("select status from users where email=? and pwd=?"); $stmt->bind_param('ss', $currentUserEmail,$currentUserPwd); mysqli_stmt_execute($stmt); mysqli_stmt_store_result($stmt); $isUserAvailable = mysqli_stmt_num_rows($stmt); $stmt->bind_result($getUserStatus); $stmt->execute() or die (mysqli_error()); $stmt->store_result(); $stmt->fetch(); $stmt->close(); if($isUserAvailable > 0){ if ($getUserStatus == "PENDING") { $userIsLoggedIn = "NO"; $registeredUser = "NO"; unset($userIsLoggedIn); setcookie("currentMobileUserName", "", time()-3600); setcookie("currentMobileUserEmail", "", time()-3600); setcookie("currentMobileSessionID", "", time()-3600); setcookie("currentMobileUID", "", time()-3600); header('Location: '.$config['MOBILE_URL'].'/index.php?error=2&email='.$currentUserEmail); }elseif (($getUserStatus == "ACTIVE") || ($getUserStatus == "active")){ //means successfully logged in //set the cookie setcookie("currentMobileUserName", $currentUserName, $expire); setcookie("currentMobileUserEmail", $currentUserEmail, $expire); setcookie("currentMobileSessionID", $getGeneratedMobileUSID, $expire); setcookie("currentMobileUID", $currentUID, $expire); $userIsLoggedIn = "YES"; $registeredUser = "YES"; $result = $stmt->execute() or die (mysqli_error($dbi)); if ($caller == "indexLoginForm"){ header('Location: '.$config['MOBILE_URL'].'/home.php'); }else{ header('Location: '.$config['MOBILE_URL'].'/home.php'); } } }else{ $userIsLoggedIn = "NO"; $registeredUser = "NO"; unset($userIsLoggedIn); setcookie("currentMobileUserName", "", time()-3600); setcookie("currentMobileUserEmail", "", time()-3600); setcookie("currentMobileSessionID", "", time()-3600); setcookie("currentMobileUID", "", time()-3600); header('Location: '.$config['MOBILE_URL'].'/index.php?error=1'); } The only way I can access my mobile site is by using opera mini. Just FYI, both the 'generic browsers' i tested my site with supports cookie (at least this is what the browser settings said). thanks

    Read the article

  • Amazon EC2 Ami recommendations for free tier?

    - by Console
    Amazon web services recently introduced a free tier, where you basically get free stuff to try out AWS and run tiny sites and projects. Basically it's free as long as you remain below a certain limit of bandwidth, disk storage etc. Since going over the limits can quickly become quite expensive (for a hobbyist) I would like some recommendations or suggestions about which AMI's I can run on the free tier, for the purpose of trying out Ruby on Rails and/or Django.

    Read the article

  • We are moving to two servers from one server due to performance issues. How do we monitor the value of this change?

    - by MikeN
    We are moving to two servers from one server due to performance issues. We are moving our MySQL DB to its own dedicated server and will keep the original machine as the front end machine running nginx/apache (Django backend.) How do we monitor the value of this change? It is possible our whole site could actually get slower since the MySQL queries will be going out over a secure remote connection instead of locally?

    Read the article

  • Why RSA SSH authentication only works after console log-in?

    - by smorhaim
    I setup RSA authentication on one of my Ubuntu servers, however after every restart, I can't log-in via ssh RSA. In order to log-in with ssh I need to first log-in via console, then the RSA starts working. Why??? Below are my sshd config file as well as an output from the ssh -vv command before console log-in and after. . Before console log-in: debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received debug2: key: /Users/smorhaim/.ssh/smorhaim (0x7ff8d8c242c0) debug2: key: /Users/smorhaim/.ssh/id_rsaadmin (0x7ff8d8c24cf0) debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey debug1: Next authentication method: publickey debug1: Offering RSA public key: /Users/smorhaim/.ssh/smorhaim debug2: we sent a publickey packet, wait for reply debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey debug1: Offering RSA public key: /Users/smorhaim/.ssh/id_rsaadmin debug2: we sent a publickey packet, wait for reply debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey debug2: we did not send a packet, disable method debug1: No more authentication methods to try. Permission denied (publickey). After console log-in: debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received debug2: key: /Users/smorhaim/.ssh/smorhaim (0x7f91c14242c0) debug2: key: /Users/smorhaim/.ssh/id_rsaadmin (0x7f91c1424ae0) debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey debug1: Next authentication method: publickey debug1: Offering RSA public key: /Users/smorhaim/.ssh/smorhaim debug2: we sent a publickey packet, wait for reply debug1: Server accepts key: pkalg ssh-rsa blen 279 debug2: input_userauth_pk_ok: fp b1:d5:90:43:be:43:52:a9:7f:05:c7:04:86:57:b3:ff debug1: Authentication succeeded (publickey). Authenticated to 10.10.30.151 ([10.10.30.151]:22). sshd config: Port 22 Protocol 2 ListenAddress 10.10.30.151 UsePrivilegeSeparation yes SyslogFacility AUTHPRIV PermitRootLogin no PasswordAuthentication no ChallengeResponseAuthentication no UsePAM yes X11Forwarding yes

    Read the article

  • Configuring varnish and django (apache/modwsgi)

    - by Hedde
    I am trying to work out why my application keeps hitting the database while I have setup varnish infront of apache. I think I am missing some vital configuration, any tips are welcome This is my curl result: HTTP/1.1 200 OK Server: Apache/2.2.16 (Debian) Content-Language: en-us Vary: Accept,Accept-Encoding,Accept-Language,Cookie Cache-Control: s-maxage=60, no-transform, max-age=60 Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8 Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 08:19:17 GMT Connection: keep-alive My varnishlog: 13 BackendClose - apache 13 BackendOpen b apache 127.0.0.1 47665 127.0.0.1 8000 13 TxRequest b GET 13 TxURL b /api/v1/events/?format=json 13 TxProtocol b HTTP/1.1 13 TxHeader b User-Agent: curl/7.19.7 (universal-apple-darwin10.0) libcurl/7.19.7 OpenSSL/0.9.8r zlib/1.2.3 13 TxHeader b Host: foobar.com 13 TxHeader b Accept: */* 13 TxHeader b X-Forwarded-For: 92.64.200.145 13 TxHeader b X-Varnish: 979305817 13 TxHeader b Accept-Encoding: gzip 13 RxProtocol b HTTP/1.1 13 RxStatus b 200 13 RxResponse b OK 13 RxHeader b Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 08:21:28 GMT 13 RxHeader b Server: Apache/2.2.16 (Debian) 13 RxHeader b Content-Language: en-us 13 RxHeader b Content-Encoding: gzip 13 RxHeader b Vary: Accept,Accept-Encoding,Accept-Language,Cookie 13 RxHeader b Cache-Control: s-maxage=60, no-transform, max-age=60 13 RxHeader b Content-Length: 6399 13 RxHeader b Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8 13 Fetch_Body b 4(length) cls 0 mklen 1 13 Length b 6399 13 BackendReuse b apache 11 SessionOpen c 92.64.200.145 53236 :80 11 ReqStart c 92.64.200.145 53236 979305817 11 RxRequest c HEAD 11 RxURL c /api/v1/events/?format=json 11 RxProtocol c HTTP/1.1 11 RxHeader c User-Agent: curl/7.19.7 (universal-apple-darwin10.0) libcurl/7.19.7 OpenSSL/0.9.8r zlib/1.2.3 11 RxHeader c Host: foobar.com 11 RxHeader c Accept: */* 11 VCL_call c recv lookup 11 VCL_call c hash 11 Hash c /api/v1/events/?format=json 11 Hash c foobar.com 11 VCL_return c hash 11 VCL_call c miss fetch 11 Backend c 13 apache apache 11 TTL c 979305817 RFC 60 -1 -1 1347697289 0 1347697288 0 60 11 VCL_call c fetch deliver 11 ObjProtocol c HTTP/1.1 11 ObjResponse c OK 11 ObjHeader c Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 08:21:28 GMT 11 ObjHeader c Server: Apache/2.2.16 (Debian) 11 ObjHeader c Content-Language: en-us 11 ObjHeader c Content-Encoding: gzip 11 ObjHeader c Vary: Accept,Accept-Encoding,Accept-Language,Cookie 11 ObjHeader c Cache-Control: s-maxage=60, no-transform, max-age=60 11 ObjHeader c Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8 11 Gzip c u F - 6399 69865 80 80 51128 11 VCL_call c deliver deliver 11 TxProtocol c HTTP/1.1 11 TxStatus c 200 11 TxResponse c OK 11 TxHeader c Server: Apache/2.2.16 (Debian) 11 TxHeader c Content-Language: en-us 11 TxHeader c Vary: Accept,Accept-Encoding,Accept-Language,Cookie 11 TxHeader c Cache-Control: s-maxage=60, no-transform, max-age=60 11 TxHeader c Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8 11 TxHeader c Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 08:21:29 GMT 11 TxHeader c Connection: keep-alive 11 Length c 0 11 ReqEnd c 979305817 1347697288.292612076 1347697289.456128597 0.000086784 1.163468122 0.000048399

    Read the article

  • Mac OS X printing to CUPS - More intuitive authentication failure?

    - by Moduspwnens
    We have a network-wide CUPS server that offers authenticated printer access to all our campus users. We've been pretty disappointed with the way Mac clients handle bad printing authentication, though. In any other authentication dialog, when a user types in a bad username or password, the window shakes briefly, allowing the user to re-enter. With printers, this isn't the case. It'll happily accept (and even save to the keychain, if specified) bad credentials. The authentication dialog is dismissed, and the user then has to deal with the print jobs showing up as "On hold (authentication required)". To get their job printed, they need to select it in the printer's queue, click "Resume", then re-enter appropriate credentials. Is there a way to get failed printing authentication to work more intuitively for Mac OS X clients? We're trying to support a BYOD environment, but our end users have been really confused by this. It's made even worse by the way it pre-populates the user's full login name (e.g. "Smith, John"), which tends to make them think to use their local machine passwords.

    Read the article

  • How to create public html (apache2) with LDAP authentication?

    - by borjamf
    Im running Apache2 on Ubuntu 12.04 Server because I want to create a home directory for each ldap user. I'm using LDAP for authentication and it's working ok. Also I've done some tests with LDAP module for Apache2 and it's working ok. The problem with this LDAP authentication is that any success login can access to ~user/public_html, even if the user is not the owner of that home. I dont know how to control that, for example, userldap2 access to userldap1/public_html. I want that only the userldap1 access to userldap1. Could anybody tell me how to control that with LDAP authentication? I hope that you'll understand me. My config (auth_ldap.conf) <Directory /home/disco2/*/public_html> AuthName "Authentication" AuthType basic AuthBasicProvider ldap AuthzLDAPAuthoritative off AuthLDAPURL ldap://prueba.borja/dc=prueba,dc=borja?uid? Require ldap-filter objectClass=posixAccount </Directory>

    Read the article

  • How to create a WHM/cPanel account, without creating a new sub-domain?

    - by Cyclops
    I have a basic VPS (full root access), with WHM/cPanel, and am learning the ropes. I'm trying to create a new account for an existing domain (mysite.com), and so far WHM won't let me - it either wants a sub-domain or fake domain, but won't allow two accounts for one domain. In the beginning, there was only the root account, and it wouldn't let me login to cPanel - a quick chat with tech support, and I am informed that I need to create a second account, which I did. So now I have an account, call it ns1me, for domain mysite.com. Now I want to create a django account. I go through the same process, but WHM won't allow me to use mysite.com as the domain for django. The docs recommend a sub-domain, so I fill the box in with django.mysite.com. I then realize that has actually created a sub-domain - going to django.mysite.com shows me its home directory, along with helpful information about what version of Apache, Python, and other mods its running (thanks, Apache). I really don't want a sub-domain, so that's out. Another chat with tech support, and they recommend a fake domain name, as it won't create anything. Sure enough, using a domain of djangomysite.com works, and WHM allows me to create a django account. But of course, I can't send email to [email protected] (where I could to [email protected]). What I want, is to be able to create a second account, associated with mysite.com (so I can run cPanel logged in as django, send email to [email protected], etc) - without creating a whole new sub-domain, or fake domain.

    Read the article

  • How to use SharpSVN in ASP.NET?

    - by Bryan
    Trying to use use SharpSVN in an ASP.NET app. So far, it's been nothing but trouble. First, I kept getting permission errors on "lock" files (that don't exist), even though NETWORK SERVICE has full permissions on the directories. Finally in frustration I just granted Everyone full control. Now I get a new error: OPTIONS of 'https://server/svn/repo': authorization failed: Could not authenticate to server: rejected Basic challenge (https://server) This happens whether I have the DefaultCredentials set below or not: using (SvnClient client = new SvnClient()) { //client.Authentication.DefaultCredentials = new System.Net.NetworkCredential("user", "password"); client.LoadConfiguration(@"C:\users\myuser\AppData\Roaming\Subversion"); SvnUpdateResult result; client.Update(workingdir, out result); } Any clues? I wish there was SOME documentation with this library, as it seems so useful.

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC: AuthorizeAttribute on default page

    - by AlexB
    The default controller in my ASP.NET MVC project is decorated with the [Authorize] attribute. When I deploy the website on my development machine and access the website, I am redirected to the login page (defined in forms loginUrl section of the Web.Config). Result: everything works as expected. When I publish the website on our production server (Windows Server 2008, IIS 7, DefaultAppPool) and access the website, the expected address shows in the address bar (/Account/LogOn?ReturnUrl=*my_expected_return_url*), but the page displays "You do not have permission to view this directory or page." instead of the login page. If I remove the [Authorize] attribute on the default controller/action, the page displays correctly. My Web.Config file: sessionState mode="InProc" timeout="30" authentication mode="Forms" forms loginUrl="~/Account/LogOn" timeout="2880"

    Read the article

  • RedirectFromLogin in Silverlight Login Page

    - by Oliver
    I am busy writing a login page in Silverlight. I am using an Authentication Service that processes the logins and I am also creating a custom Membership and Roles providers. Everything is working but I need some assistance. I would like some advice on how to redirect the user to page they came from before they were pushed to the Login page. Basically I want the same behavior as the standard ASP.Net login. I am fully aware of the differences between ASP and Silverlight regarding Client and Server side models. I can do the navigation but I always lose the session and cookie when I perform HtmlPage.Window.Navigate() to the ReturnUrl...

    Read the article

  • WCF via Windows Service - Authenticating Clients

    - by Sean
    I am a WCF / Security Newb. I have created a WCF service which is hosted via a windows service. The WCF service grabs data from a 3rd party data source that is secured via windows authentication. I need to either: Pass the client's privileges through the windows service, through the WCF service and into the 3rd party data source, or... Limit who can call the windows service / WCF service to members of a particular AD group. Any suggestions on how I can do either of these tasks?

    Read the article

  • Storing user info in Session using an Object vs. normal variables

    - by justinl
    I'm in the process of implementing a user authentication system for my website. I'm using an open source library that maintains user information by creating a User object and storing that object inside my php SESSION variable. Is this the best way to store and access that information? I find it a bit of a hassle to access the user variables because I have to create an object to access them first: $userObj = $_SESSION['userObject']; $userObj->userId; instead of just accessing the user id like this how I would usually store the user ID: $_SESSION['userId']; Is there an advantage to storing a bunch of user data as an object instead of just storing them as individual SESSION variables? ps - The library also seems to store a handful of variables inside the user object (id, username, date joined, email, last user db query) but I really don't care to have all that information stored in my session. I only really want to keep the user id and username.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175  | Next Page >