Search Results

Search found 27606 results on 1105 pages for 'javascript disabled'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 169/1105 | < Previous Page | 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176  | Next Page >

  • How to turn this into valid javascript?

    - by Todd Horrtyz
    If the backslashes don't do it, then what? [...] foo: ('lorem ipsum dolor sit amet'), bar: ('lorem ipsum \(dolor\) sit amet'), [...] Here's the full code: google.load('orkut.share', '1'); google.setOnLoadCallback(function() { new google.orkut.share.Button({ title: 'foo', summary: ('foo \(bar\) foo'), thumbnail: ('...'), destination: '...'}).draw('orkut'); });

    Read the article

  • How to get the root path in JavaScript?

    - by Axel
    I am using mod_rewrite to remap the URLs in my website in the following format: http://www.mydomain.com/health/54856 http://www.mydomain.com/economy/strategy/911025/ http://www.mydomain.com/tags/obama/new The problem is that I am making AJAX calls to a file: http://www.mydomain.com/login.php And I don't want to write the FULL url or even use the ../ trick because there isn't a fixed level of folders. So, what i want is something to access the login.php from the root, whatever the domain name is: $.ajax({ type: "POST", url: "http://www.mydomain.com/login.php" });

    Read the article

  • How to redirect a user to a new webpage after a Javascript Alert/confrim box

    - by David Maldonado
    I have a client who wishes to have an alert/confirm box pop up when a user leaves the site, then based on what they choose, they will either stay on the page or go to a new page (would love if it would work in all browsers). I have been twiddling all day and have got this piece of code, but doesn't work too well. <script> window.onbeforeonload = function exitLeave(){var answer = confirm("You have not filled out your questionnaire yet") if (answer){ window.location = "http://www.google.com/"; } else{ alert("Cancel it !") } } </script> Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Javascript: variable scope & the evils of globals

    - by Nick
    I'm trying to be good, I really am, but I can't see how to do it :) Any advice on how to not use a global here would be greatly appreciated. Let's call the global G. Function A Builds G by AJAX Function B Uses G Function C Calls B Called by numerous event handlers attached to DOM elements (type 1) Function D Calls B Called by numerous event handlers attached to DOM elements (type 2) I can't see how I can get around using a global here. The DOM elements (types 1 & 2) are created in other functions (E&F) which are unconnected with A. I don't want to add G to each event handler (because it's large and there's lots of these event handlers), and doing so would require the same kind of solution as I'm seeking here (i.e., getting G to E&F). The global G, BTW, is an array that is necessary to build other elements as they, in turn, are built by AJAX. I'm not convinced that a singleton is real solution, either. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Javascript onresize event

    - by blogofsongs
    If I have this window.onresize = function() { alert('resized!!'); }; My function gets fired multiple times throughout the resize, but I want to capture the completion of the resize. This is in IE. Any ideas? There are various ideas out there, but not has worked for me so far (example IE's supposed window.onresizeend event.)

    Read the article

  • Help improve this Javascript code?

    - by Galilyou
    Hello SO, In short, I'm dealing with Telerik's RadTreeView, and I want enable checking all the child nodes if the user checked the parent node. Simple enough! OK here's my code that handles OnClientNodeChecked event of the TreeView: function UpdateAllChildren(nodes, checked) { var i; for (i = 0; i < nodes.get_count(); i++) { var currentNode = nodes.getNode(i); currentNode.set_checked(checked); alert("now processing: " + currentNode.get_text()); if (currentNode.get_nodes().get_count() > 0) { UpdateAllChildren(currentNode.get_nodes(), checked); } } } function ClientNodeChecked(sender, eventArgs) { var node = eventArgs.get_node(); UpdateAllChildren(node.get_nodes(), node.get_checked()); } And here's the TreeView's markup: <telerik:RadTreeView ID="RadTreeView1" runat="server" CheckBoxes="True" OnClientNodeChecked="ClientNodeChecked"></telerik:RadTreeView> The tree contains quite a lot of nodes, and this is causing my targeted browser (ehm, that's IE7) to really slow down while running it. Furthermore IE7 displays an error message asking me to stop the page from running scripts as it's might make my computer not responsive (yeah, scary enough). So what do you guys propose to optimize this code? Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Architecture of a single-page JavaScript web application?

    - by fig-gnuton
    How should a complex single-page JS web application be structured on the client-side? Specifically I'm curious about how to cleanly structure the application in terms of its model objects, UI components, any controllers, and objects handling server persistence. MVC seemed like a fit at first. But with UI components nested at various depths (each with their own way of acting on/reacting to model data, and each generating events which they themselves may or may not handle directly), it doesn't seem like MVC can be cleanly applied. (But please correct me if that's not the case.) -- (This question resulted in two suggestions of using ajax, which is obviously needed for anything other than the most trivial one-page app.)

    Read the article

  • Javascript "inlet" or "offset" function for drop-list options

    - by Camran
    I have seen on several sites that drop list values can have offsets... For example this drop-list: Fruits Apple Banana Orange Colors Red White Black The above are all options, but some have "inlets" or "offsets" or whatever you want to call it. How is this done with js? (regular js, not jquery at the moment) Thanks If you need more input let me know.

    Read the article

  • Iterating over two arrays at a time in Javascript

    - by Ankur
    I want to iterate over two arrays at the same time, as the values for any given index i in array A corresponds to the value in array B. I am currently using this code, and getting 'undefined' when I call queryPredicates[i] or queryObjects[i], I know my array is populated as I print out the array prior to calling this, I haven't put all the other code in as it might be confusing, but if you think the problem is not evident from this I will edit the question: function getObjectCount(){ variables = queryPredicates.length; //the number of variables is found by the length of the arrays - they should both be of the same length queryString="count="+variables; for(var i=1; i<=variables;i++){ alert(queryPredicates[i]); alert(queryObjects[i]); } Thanks

    Read the article

  • Javascript Replace text in string

    - by Tegan Snyder
    I'm having some troubles getting regex to replace all occurances of a string within a string. **What to replace:** href="/newsroom **Replace with this:** href="http://intranet/newsroom This isn't working: str.replace(/href="/newsroom/g, 'href="http://intranet/newsroom"'); Any ideas? Thanks, Tegan

    Read the article

  • find and replace tokens in javascript

    - by Sourabh
    Hello, I have to do something like this string = " this is a good example to show" search = array {this,good,show} find and replace them with a token like string = " {1} is a {2} example to {3}" (order is intact) the string will undergo some processing and then string = " {1} is a {2} numbers to {3}" (order is intact) tokens are again replaced back to the string likem so that the string becomes string = " this is a good number to show" How should it be implemented so that the process is done at high performance ? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Malicious javascript code in my website

    - by Depami
    I found this code in my website sourcecode: var _0xd28d=["\x5F\x30\x78\x33\x32\x6C\x73\x6A\x39","\x5F\x78\x6C\x74","\x5F\x78\x38\x66\x6B\x63\x33","\x66\x6C\x6F\x6F\x72","\x72\x61\x6E\x64\x6F\x6D","\x6C\x65\x6E\x67\x74\x68"];var _0x9ae4=[_0xd28d[0],12,_0xd28d[1],_0xd28d[2],2,31,Math,_0xd28d[3]];var _0xcd6e=[_0x9ae4[5],_0x9ae4[0],_0x9ae4[_0x9ae4[4]],_0x9ae4[3],4,_0xd28d[4]];var _0xr6g0={};_0xr6g0[_0xcd6e[2]]=0;_0xr6g0[_0x9ae4[4]]=function (){var _0x4c68x4={};_0x4c68x4[_0xd28d[0]]=_0x9ae4[0];do{_0x4c68x4[_0x9ae4[0]]+=_0x4c68x4[_0xd28d[0]][_0x9ae4[6][_0x9ae4[7]](_0x9ae4[6][_0xcd6e[5]]()*_0x4c68x4[_0xd28d[0]][_0xd28d[5]])];} while(_0x4c68x4[_0xd28d[0]][_0xd28d[5]]<_0xcd6e[0]);;_0x4c68x4[_0x4c68x4[_0x9ae4[0]]]=function (){_0xr6g0[_0xcd6e[2]]++;_0xr6g0[_0xcd6e[2]]%=_0x9ae4[1];return _0x4c68x4[_0x4c68x4[_0x9ae4[0]]];} ;return _0x4c68x4[_0x4c68x4[_0xcd6e[1]]];} ;_0xr6g0[_0x9ae4[_0xcd6e[4]]]()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()(); I was wondering, what is it?

    Read the article

  • JavaScript loop stops on "localStorage.removeItem"

    - by user1755603
    Why is the "localStorage.removeItem" stopping the loop? If I remove "localStorage.removeItem" and only leave the "alert", it loops though whole thing, but with "localStorage.removeItem" it stops on the first match. function removeTask() { for (i=0; i < localStorage.length; i++){ checkbox = document.getElementById('utford'+i); if (checkbox.checked == true) { alert(i); localStorage.removeItem(localStorage.key(i)); } } printList(); }

    Read the article

  • Sending information between JavaScript and Web Services using AJAX

    - by COB-CSU-AM
    Alright so I'm using Microsoft's Web Services and AJAX to get information from a SQL database for use with java script on the client side. And I'm wondering what the best method is. Before I started working on the project, the web services were setup to return a C# List filled with some objects. Those objects variables (ints, strings, etc.) contain the data I want to use. Of course, java script can't do much with this, to the best of my knowledge. I then modified the web service to return a 2D Array, but java script got confused, and to the best of my knowledge can't handle 2D array's returned from C#. I then tried to use a regular array, but then a found the length property of an array in JS doesn't carry over, so I couldn't preform a for loop through all the items, because there wasn't anyway of knowing how many elements there were. The only other thing I can thing of is returning a string with special char's to separate the data, but this seems way too convoluted. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Using JQuery replaceWith with a JavaScript Variable

    - by JJ56
    Here's my html: <div class="timer">Not Started</div> And JS/JQ: var seconds = 10; var minutes = 0; setTimeout("updateTimer()", 1000); function updateTimer() { if (seconds == 0 && minutes != 0) { minutes -= minutes; seconds = 59; alert (seconds); } else if (seconds == 1 && minutes == 0) { alert ('done'); } else { seconds = seconds - 1; //alert (seconds); $(".timer").replaceWith(seconds); } setTimeout("updateTimer()", 1000); } Instead of replacing Not Started with 10, 9, 8..., Not Started disappears.

    Read the article

  • Can't find the error in my javascript code

    - by Olivier
    This js program should display the first 100 prime numbers, but instead it crashes each and every time and I can't find the error! Could someone point me towards the best way to debug js code?! Thank you! // initialisation of the array p holding the first 100 prime numbers var p = []; // set the first prime number to 2 p.push(2); // find the first 100 prime numbers and place them in the array p var i = 3; while (p.length < 100) { var prime = true; loop: for (var item in p){ if (i%item === 0){ prime = false; break loop; } } if (prime) p.push(i); i = i + 2; } // display the first 100 prime numbers found var i=1; for (var item in p){ document.writeln(i,item); i++; }

    Read the article

  • small scale web site - global javascript file style/format/pattern - improving maintainability

    - by yaya3
    I frequently create (and inherit) small to medium websites where I have the following sort of code in a single file (normally named global.js or application.js or projectname.js). If functions get big, I normally put them in a seperate file, and call them at the bottom of the file below in the $(document).ready() section. If I have a few functions that are unique to certain pages, I normally have another switch statement for the body class inside the $(document).ready() section. How could I restructure this code to make it more maintainable? Note: I am less interested in the functions innards, more so the structure, and how different types of functions should be dealt with. I've also posted the code here - http://pastie.org/999932 in case it makes it any easier var ProjectNameEnvironment = {}; function someFunctionUniqueToTheHomepageNotWorthMakingConfigurable () { $('.foo').hide(); $('.bar').click(function(){ $('.foo').show(); }); } function functionThatIsWorthMakingConfigurable(config) { var foo = config.foo || 700; var bar = 200; return foo * bar; } function globallyRequiredJqueryPluginTrigger (tooltip_string) { var tooltipTrigger = $(tooltip_string); tooltipTrigger.tooltip({ showURL: false ... }); } function minorUtilityOneLiner (selector) { $(selector).find('li:even').not('li ul li').addClass('even'); } var Lightbox = {}; Lightbox.setup = function(){ $('li#foo a').attr('href','#alpha'); $('li#bar a').attr('href','#beta'); } Lightbox.init = function (config){ if (typeof $.fn.fancybox =='function') { Lightbox.setup(); var fade_in_speed = config.fade_in_speed || 1000; var frame_height = config.frame_height || 1700; $(config.selector).fancybox({ frameHeight : frame_height, callbackOnShow: function() { var content_to_load = config.content_to_load; ... }, callbackOnClose : function(){ $('body').height($('body').height()); } }); } else { if (ProjectNameEnvironment.debug) { alert('the fancybox plugin has not been loaded'); } } } // ---------- order of execution ----------- $(document).ready(function () { urls = urlConfig(); (function globalFunctions() { $('.tooltip-trigger').each(function(){ globallyRequiredJqueryPluginTrigger(this); }); minorUtilityOneLiner('ul.foo') Lightbox.init({ selector : 'a#a-lightbox-trigger-js', ... }); Lightbox.init({ selector : 'a#another-lightbox-trigger-js', ... }); })(); if ( $('body').attr('id') == 'home-page' ) { (function homeFunctions() { someFunctionUniqueToTheHomepageNotWorthMakingConfigurable (); })(); } });

    Read the article

  • Example from: "Javascript - The Good Parts"

    - by Matrym
    What "ugliness" does the following solve? There's something I'm not getting, and I'd appreciate help understanding what it is. For example, by augmenting Function.prototype, we can make a method available to all functions: Function.prototype.method = function (name, func) { this.prototype[name] = func; return this; }; By augmenting Function.prototype with a method method, we no longer have to type the name of the prototype property. That bit of ugliness can now be hidden.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176  | Next Page >