Search Results

Search found 27606 results on 1105 pages for 'javascript disabled'.

Page 169/1105 | < Previous Page | 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176  | Next Page >

  • find and replace tokens in javascript

    - by Sourabh
    Hello, I have to do something like this string = " this is a good example to show" search = array {this,good,show} find and replace them with a token like string = " {1} is a {2} example to {3}" (order is intact) the string will undergo some processing and then string = " {1} is a {2} numbers to {3}" (order is intact) tokens are again replaced back to the string likem so that the string becomes string = " this is a good number to show" How should it be implemented so that the process is done at high performance ? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • using javascript replace() to match the last occurance of a string

    - by Dave
    I'm building an 'add new row' function for product variations, and I'm struggling with the regex required to match the form attribute keys. So, I'm basically cloning rows, then incrementing the keys, like this (coffeescript): newrow = oldrow.find('select, input, textarea').each -> this.name = this.name.replace(/\[(\d+)\]/, (str, p1) -> "[" + (parseInt(p1, 10) + 1) + "]" ) this.id = this.id.replace(/\_(\d+)\_/, (str, p1) -> "_" + (parseInt(p1, 10) + 1) + "_" ) .end() This correctly increments a field with a name of product[variations][1][name], turning it into product[variations][2][name] BUT Each variation can have multiple options (eg, color can be red, blue, green), so I need to be able turn this product[variations][1][options][2][name] into product[variations][1][options][3][name], leaving the variation key alone. What regex do I need to match only the last occurrence of a key (the options key)?

    Read the article

  • detecting object-reference duplication across JavaScript files

    - by AnC
    I have a number of files with contents like this: function hello() { ... element1.text = foo.locale.lorem; element2.text = foo.locale.ipsum; ... elementn.text = foo.locale.whatever; ... } function world() { ... var label = bar.options.baz.blah; var toggle = bar.options.baz.use_toggle; ... } This could be written more efficiently, and also be more readable, by creating a shortcut to the locale object: function hello() { var loc = foo.locale; ... element1.text = loc.lorem; element2.text = loc.ipsum; ... elementn.text = loc.whatever; ... } function world() { var options = bar.options.baz; ... var label = options.blah; var toggle = options.use_toggle; ... } Is there a simple way to detect occurrences of such duplication for any arbitrary object (it's not always as simple as "locale", or foo.something)? Basically, I wanna know where lengthy object references appear two or more times within a function. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • javascript problem in IE8

    - by Pankaj
    This code is not working on IE8 window.open(url, "find_users", "resizable=yes,scrollbars=yes,menubar=no,toolbar=no,location=no,status=yes,height=300,width=500"); I am getting Object Expected error in only IE8, its working fine in all other brouser.

    Read the article

  • Malicious javascript code in my website

    - by Depami
    I found this code in my website sourcecode: var _0xd28d=["\x5F\x30\x78\x33\x32\x6C\x73\x6A\x39","\x5F\x78\x6C\x74","\x5F\x78\x38\x66\x6B\x63\x33","\x66\x6C\x6F\x6F\x72","\x72\x61\x6E\x64\x6F\x6D","\x6C\x65\x6E\x67\x74\x68"];var _0x9ae4=[_0xd28d[0],12,_0xd28d[1],_0xd28d[2],2,31,Math,_0xd28d[3]];var _0xcd6e=[_0x9ae4[5],_0x9ae4[0],_0x9ae4[_0x9ae4[4]],_0x9ae4[3],4,_0xd28d[4]];var _0xr6g0={};_0xr6g0[_0xcd6e[2]]=0;_0xr6g0[_0x9ae4[4]]=function (){var _0x4c68x4={};_0x4c68x4[_0xd28d[0]]=_0x9ae4[0];do{_0x4c68x4[_0x9ae4[0]]+=_0x4c68x4[_0xd28d[0]][_0x9ae4[6][_0x9ae4[7]](_0x9ae4[6][_0xcd6e[5]]()*_0x4c68x4[_0xd28d[0]][_0xd28d[5]])];} while(_0x4c68x4[_0xd28d[0]][_0xd28d[5]]<_0xcd6e[0]);;_0x4c68x4[_0x4c68x4[_0x9ae4[0]]]=function (){_0xr6g0[_0xcd6e[2]]++;_0xr6g0[_0xcd6e[2]]%=_0x9ae4[1];return _0x4c68x4[_0x4c68x4[_0x9ae4[0]]];} ;return _0x4c68x4[_0x4c68x4[_0xcd6e[1]]];} ;_0xr6g0[_0x9ae4[_0xcd6e[4]]]()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()(); I was wondering, what is it?

    Read the article

  • Javascript "inlet" or "offset" function for drop-list options

    - by Camran
    I have seen on several sites that drop list values can have offsets... For example this drop-list: Fruits Apple Banana Orange Colors Red White Black The above are all options, but some have "inlets" or "offsets" or whatever you want to call it. How is this done with js? (regular js, not jquery at the moment) Thanks If you need more input let me know.

    Read the article

  • help, stuck with logic variable comparison loop, javascript

    - by Jamex
    I have an input text box for search of input, the id of the text box is: id="search". if a user enters 'cat' at first and hit search. In the function, I get the value 'cat' by using the syntax: var input = document.getElementById("search").value; After that, the user enter 'dog' in the search box and hit search using the same function. The function would assign 'dog' to the input variable. How would I compare the current value (dog) to the previously entered value (cat)? I have tried to assign the original input with a statement, something like var orig = input; but that would only overwrite the original input with the new input. What is the logical approach to this problem.

    Read the article

  • Javascript Replace text in string

    - by Tegan Snyder
    I'm having some troubles getting regex to replace all occurances of a string within a string. **What to replace:** href="/newsroom **Replace with this:** href="http://intranet/newsroom This isn't working: str.replace(/href="/newsroom/g, 'href="http://intranet/newsroom"'); Any ideas? Thanks, Tegan

    Read the article

  • Javascript - event listener toggle button

    - by user2546157
    I'm trying to create a button which can toggle "double click" to "single click" and in the opposite. For some reason, once it toggles to single click and it cannot toggle back. Can anyone please help! function init() { normal_listeners(); } function addListener(){ var image1 = document.getElementById('image_1'); var image2 = document.getElementById('image_2'); var image3 = document.getElementById('image_3'); if(document.getElementById('listener_1').value == "Listener"){ document.getElementById('listener_1').style.backgroundColor = "red"; alert("Normal"); image1.addEventListener("dblclick", function(){userChoice(1);}, false); image2.addEventListener("dblclick", function(){userChoice(2);}, false); image3.addEventListener("dblclick", function(){userChoice(3);}, false); document.getElementById('listener_1').value = "Normal"; } else if(document.getElementById('listener_1').value == "Normal") { document.getElementById('listener_1').style.backgroundColor = "green"; alert("Listener"); image1.addEventListener("click", function(){userChoice(1);}, false); image2.addEventListener("click", function(){userChoice(2);}, false); image3.addEventListener("click", function(){userChoice(3);}, false); document.getElementById('listener_1').value = "Listener"; } } function normal_listeners(){ var image1 = document.getElementById('image_1'); var image2 = document.getElementById('image_2'); var image3 = document.getElementById('image_3'); var listener1 = document.getElementById('listener_1'); listener1.addEventListener("click", addListener, false); image1.addEventListener("dblclick", function(){userChoice(1);}, false); image2.addEventListener("dblclick", function(){userChoice(2);}, false); image3.addEventListener("dblclick", function(){userChoice(3);}, false); } window.onload = init; <img id="image_1" src="rock.jpg" alt="ROCK" width="100" height="100"> <img id="image_2" src="paper.jpg" alt="PAPER" width="100" height="100"> <img id="image_3" src="scissors.jpg" alt="SCISSORS" width="100" height="100"> <input type="button" id="listener_1" value="Normal" style="background-color:red">

    Read the article

  • Javascript: variable scope & the evils of globals

    - by Nick
    I'm trying to be good, I really am, but I can't see how to do it :) Any advice on how to not use a global here would be greatly appreciated. Let's call the global G. Function A Builds G by AJAX Function B Uses G Function C Calls B Called by numerous event handlers attached to DOM elements (type 1) Function D Calls B Called by numerous event handlers attached to DOM elements (type 2) I can't see how I can get around using a global here. The DOM elements (types 1 & 2) are created in other functions (E&F) which are unconnected with A. I don't want to add G to each event handler (because it's large and there's lots of these event handlers), and doing so would require the same kind of solution as I'm seeking here (i.e., getting G to E&F). The global G, BTW, is an array that is necessary to build other elements as they, in turn, are built by AJAX. I'm not convinced that a singleton is real solution, either. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Filter records based on Date Range + ASP.NET + Regex + Javascript

    - by ASIF
    Hi I need to filter data based on a date range. My table has a field Process date. I need to filter the records and display those in the range FromDate to ToDate. How do I write a function in VB.NET which can help me filter the data. Protected Shared Function ObjectInRange(ByRef obj As Object, ByVal str1 As String, ByVal str2 As String) As Boolean Dim inRange = False For Each prop As PropertyInfo In obj.GetType().GetProperties() Dim propVal = prop.GetValue(obj, Nothing) If propVal Is Nothing Then Continue For End If Dim propValString = Convert.ToString(propVal) If Regex....WHAT GOES HERE? Then inRange = True Exit For End If Next Return inRange End Function Am I on the right track??

    Read the article

  • javascript window.location gives me a wrong url path when checking firebug

    - by Elson Solano
    I have a sample url website: http://mysite.com/ var host = window.location.protocol+"://"+window.location.hostname; $.ajax({ type:"POST", data: params, url : host+'/forms/get_data.php', success:function(data){ ...othercodeblahblah } }); Why is it that when I try to check my firebug it makes the URL weird. This is the sample output of firebug: http://mysite.com/mysite.com/forms/get_data.php With this url it now gives me: "NetworkError: 404 Not Found - http://mysite.com/mysite.com/forms/get_data.php" Shouldn't it output like http://mysite.com/forms/get_data.php ? Why is it giving me a wrong url path? Your help would be greatly appreciated and rewarded! Thank!

    Read the article

  • how to stop the setinterval() in javascript

    - by vakas
    i want to stop the setinterval at a specific condtion i am using this function Blink(targetId) { if($(targetId)) { if($(targetId).style.color=='red') $(targetId).style.color='black'; else $(targetId).style.color='red'; } else //STOP THE FUNCTION } setInterval(Blink,1000,'timer_'+sourceId);

    Read the article

  • Getting 'sections.each is not a function' with javascript / scriptaculous

    - by tonyyeb
    Hi all Trying an example piece of code for scriptaculous for doing some drag and drop. It works fine in IE8 but Firefox and Chrome generate an error of 'sections.each is not a function' Here is the code: function getGroupOrder() { var sections = document.getElementsByClassName('section'); var alerttext = ''; sections.each(function(section) { var sectionID = section.id; var order = Sortable.serialize(sectionID); var mySectionID = Right(section.id); var myLen = String(Sortable.sequence(section)).length; var StuCode = ""; if (myLen ==8) {var StuCode = String(Sortable.sequence(section)).substring(myLen, 2);} else if (myLen ==9) {var StuCode = String(Sortable.sequence(section)).substring(myLen, 3);} alerttext += mySectionID + ': ' + StuCode + '\n'; alerttextb = sectionID + ': ' + StuCode + '\n'; } } One solution suggested on a forum "I was able to resolve this issue by wrapping the call to document.getElementsByClassName('section'); with $A()" but I don't have a clue what that means! I asked what it meant but the post was made in 2008 and no reply as yet. Thanks for any help provided. Regards

    Read the article

  • small scale web site - global javascript file style/format/pattern - improving maintainability

    - by yaya3
    I frequently create (and inherit) small to medium websites where I have the following sort of code in a single file (normally named global.js or application.js or projectname.js). If functions get big, I normally put them in a seperate file, and call them at the bottom of the file below in the $(document).ready() section. If I have a few functions that are unique to certain pages, I normally have another switch statement for the body class inside the $(document).ready() section. How could I restructure this code to make it more maintainable? Note: I am less interested in the functions innards, more so the structure, and how different types of functions should be dealt with. I've also posted the code here - http://pastie.org/999932 in case it makes it any easier var ProjectNameEnvironment = {}; function someFunctionUniqueToTheHomepageNotWorthMakingConfigurable () { $('.foo').hide(); $('.bar').click(function(){ $('.foo').show(); }); } function functionThatIsWorthMakingConfigurable(config) { var foo = config.foo || 700; var bar = 200; return foo * bar; } function globallyRequiredJqueryPluginTrigger (tooltip_string) { var tooltipTrigger = $(tooltip_string); tooltipTrigger.tooltip({ showURL: false ... }); } function minorUtilityOneLiner (selector) { $(selector).find('li:even').not('li ul li').addClass('even'); } var Lightbox = {}; Lightbox.setup = function(){ $('li#foo a').attr('href','#alpha'); $('li#bar a').attr('href','#beta'); } Lightbox.init = function (config){ if (typeof $.fn.fancybox =='function') { Lightbox.setup(); var fade_in_speed = config.fade_in_speed || 1000; var frame_height = config.frame_height || 1700; $(config.selector).fancybox({ frameHeight : frame_height, callbackOnShow: function() { var content_to_load = config.content_to_load; ... }, callbackOnClose : function(){ $('body').height($('body').height()); } }); } else { if (ProjectNameEnvironment.debug) { alert('the fancybox plugin has not been loaded'); } } } // ---------- order of execution ----------- $(document).ready(function () { urls = urlConfig(); (function globalFunctions() { $('.tooltip-trigger').each(function(){ globallyRequiredJqueryPluginTrigger(this); }); minorUtilityOneLiner('ul.foo') Lightbox.init({ selector : 'a#a-lightbox-trigger-js', ... }); Lightbox.init({ selector : 'a#another-lightbox-trigger-js', ... }); })(); if ( $('body').attr('id') == 'home-page' ) { (function homeFunctions() { someFunctionUniqueToTheHomepageNotWorthMakingConfigurable (); })(); } });

    Read the article

  • Using JQuery replaceWith with a JavaScript Variable

    - by JJ56
    Here's my html: <div class="timer">Not Started</div> And JS/JQ: var seconds = 10; var minutes = 0; setTimeout("updateTimer()", 1000); function updateTimer() { if (seconds == 0 && minutes != 0) { minutes -= minutes; seconds = 59; alert (seconds); } else if (seconds == 1 && minutes == 0) { alert ('done'); } else { seconds = seconds - 1; //alert (seconds); $(".timer").replaceWith(seconds); } setTimeout("updateTimer()", 1000); } Instead of replacing Not Started with 10, 9, 8..., Not Started disappears.

    Read the article

  • Iterating over two arrays at a time in Javascript

    - by Ankur
    I want to iterate over two arrays at the same time, as the values for any given index i in array A corresponds to the value in array B. I am currently using this code, and getting 'undefined' when I call queryPredicates[i] or queryObjects[i], I know my array is populated as I print out the array prior to calling this, I haven't put all the other code in as it might be confusing, but if you think the problem is not evident from this I will edit the question: function getObjectCount(){ variables = queryPredicates.length; //the number of variables is found by the length of the arrays - they should both be of the same length queryString="count="+variables; for(var i=1; i<=variables;i++){ alert(queryPredicates[i]); alert(queryObjects[i]); } Thanks

    Read the article

  • Example from: "Javascript - The Good Parts"

    - by Matrym
    What "ugliness" does the following solve? There's something I'm not getting, and I'd appreciate help understanding what it is. For example, by augmenting Function.prototype, we can make a method available to all functions: Function.prototype.method = function (name, func) { this.prototype[name] = func; return this; }; By augmenting Function.prototype with a method method, we no longer have to type the name of the prototype property. That bit of ugliness can now be hidden.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176  | Next Page >