Search Results

Search found 13537 results on 542 pages for 'installation failure'.

Page 174/542 | < Previous Page | 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181  | Next Page >

  • ubuntu mount iso but some files are unreadable

    - by Chao
    I'm new to Linux and just installed ubuntu 12.04 amd64 this month. I had failed installing Texlive with texlive2012 iso image. I used the recommended command to mount: "mount -t iso9660 -o ro,loop,noauto /your/texlive2012.iso /mnt " But the installer failed to read some file. The iso is fine, I checked the md5. I extracted everything from iso with archive manager, and it installed successfully. So, why mount is not working? Thanks. UPDATE with furius iso mount tool, mount with Fuse, and it installed, with warning: Summary of warning messages during installation: Downloaded ./archive/calligra-type1.tar.xz, size equal, but md5sum differs; downloading again. While mount with Loop, it failed to install. Updated Error message from terminal, mounted with furius iso mount, loop. texlive2012-20120701_iso$ ./install-tl -gui Loading ./tlpkg/texlive.tlpdb Installing TeX Live 2012 from: . Platform: x86_64-linux = 'x86_64 with GNU/Linux' Distribution: inst (compressed) Directory for temporary files: /tmp Installing [0001/2481, time/total: ??:??/??:??]: 12many [3k] Installing [0002/2481, time/total: 00:00/00:00]: 2up [4k] Installing [0003/2481, time/total: 00:00/00:00]: Asana-Math [457k] Installing [0004/2481, time/total: 00:00/00:00]: ESIEEcv [2k] ... Installing [0265/2481, time/total: 00:10/01:09]: calctab [5k] Installing [0266/2481, time/total: 00:10/01:09]: calligra [42k] Installing [0267/2481, time/total: 00:10/01:09]: calligra-type1 [59k] Downloaded ./archive/calligra-type1.tar.xz, size equal, but md5sum differs; downloading again. ./tlpkg/installer/xz/xzdec.x86_64-linux: (stdin): File is corrupt tar: Unexpected EOF in archive tar: rmtlseek not stopped at a record boundary tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now untar: untarring /home/lichao/ttt/temp/calligra-type1.tar failed (in /home/lichao/ttt/texmf-dist) untarring /home/lichao/ttt/temp/calligra-type1.tar failed, stopping install. Installation failed. Rerunning the installer will try to restart the installation. Or you can restart by running the installer with: install-tl --profile installation.profile [EXTRA-ARGS] ./install-tl: Could not write to install-tl.log, so flushing messages to stderr. Loading ./tlpkg/texlive.tlpdb Installing TeX Live 2012 from: . Platform: x86_64-linux = 'x86_64 with GNU/Linux' Distribution: inst (compressed) Directory for temporary files: /tmp Installer revision: 26794 Database revision: 26935 Installing [0001/2481, time/total: ??:??/??:??]: 12many [3k] Installing [0002/2481, time/total: 00:00/00:00]: 2up [4k] Installing [0003/2481, time/total: 00:00/00:00]: Asana-Math [457k] Installing [0004/2481, time/total: 00:00/00:00]: ESIEEcv [2k] Installing [0005/2481, time/total: 00:00/00:00]: FAQ-en [1k] ... Installing [0262/2481, time/total: 00:10/01:09]: c90 [2k] Installing [0263/2481, time/total: 00:10/01:09]: cachepic [5k] Installing [0264/2481, time/total: 00:10/01:09]: cachepic.x86_64-linux [1k] Installing [0265/2481, time/total: 00:10/01:09]: calctab [5k] Installing [0266/2481, time/total: 00:10/01:09]: calligra [42k] Installing [0267/2481, time/total: 00:10/01:09]: calligra-type1 [59k] Downloaded ./archive/calligra-type1.tar.xz, size equal, but md5sum differs; downloading again. untar: untarring /home/lichao/ttt/temp/calligra-type1.tar failed (in /home/lichao/ttt/texmf-dist) untarring /home/lichao/ttt/temp/calligra-type1.tar failed, stopping install. Installation failed. Rerunning the installer will try to restart the installation. Or you can restart by running the installer with: install-tl --profile installation.profile [EXTRA-ARGS] Segmentation fault (core dumped) I am sure that the iso is fine. I can open it with archive manager and all files are good. But after mounting it, even archive manager failed to open some files (which can be opened when the iso is opened in archive manager).

    Read the article

  • Virtualization in Ubuntu 9.10

    - by Jeff Dege
    I have an existing Centos 5 installation. I would like to upgrade to Ubuntu. Thing is, I don't want to be down for as long as it will take to get my entire environment moved over - software installed, connectivity configured, etc. I'd like to take it one step at a time. But I don't really want to keep rebooting back and forth from the new OS to the old OS. That's what I did last time I upgraded to a new OS, and it got old real fast. So, since my new MB is virtualization-ready (AMD Phenom II 945 quad-core), I figured I could create a virtual machine, under the new OS installation, that ran the old OS installation. The problem is that the documentation I've been able to find has been pretty sparse. I've found a lot of possibilities, and little info on which would be capable of doing what I want. I have a new Ubuntu 9.10 installation, and a second disk containing the Centos 5 installation. And I don't know where to go next. Any help would be appreciated.

    Read the article

  • SQL Server Express 2005 SP3 Update Keeps Coming Back (KB995706)

    - by Xavier
    Hi Guys, I have installed the above update through Windows Update. The update went through, reported a successful installation, and then straight after that it came back as an available update. I have done it a few times and my update log now contains multiple successful installations of KB995706. I have tried to uncheck it in the list of updates but it keeps coming back as well. The machine is a Server 2008 RC2 Standard. It's got SQL Server 2005 Express as well as SQL Server 2008 Standard. In the Event Log: Installation Successful: Windows successfully installed the following update: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Express Edition Service Pack 3 (KB955706) followed by Installation Ready: The following updates are downloaded and ready for installation. To install the updates, an administrator should log on to this computer and Windows will prompt with further instructions: - Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Express Edition Service Pack 3 (KB955706)

    Read the article

  • ldirectord ipvsadm not show reals ip and not work wtih pacemaker and corosync

    - by miguer27
    first thanks for your time. I'm having a problem with ldirectord that I can not solve, I comment my situation: I have two nodes with pace maker and corosync and configure somes resources: root@ldap1:/home/mamartin# crm status Last updated: Tue Jun 3 12:58:30 2014 Last change: Tue Jun 3 12:23:47 2014 via cibadmin on ldap1 Stack: openais Current DC: ldap2 - partition with quorum Version: 1.1.7-ee0730e13d124c3d58f00016c3376a1de5323cff 2 Nodes configured, 2 expected votes 7 Resources configured. Online: [ ldap1 ldap2 ] Resource Group: IPV_LVS IPV_4 (ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2): Started ldap1 IPV_6 (ocf::heartbeat:IPv6addr): Started ldap1 lvs (ocf::heartbeat:ldirectord): Started ldap1 Clone Set: clon_IPV_lo [IPV_lo] Started: [ ldap2 ] Stopped: [ IPV_lo:1 ] root@ldap1:/home/mamartin# crm configure show node ldap2 \ attributes standby="off" node ldap1 \ attributes standby="off" primitive IPV-lo_4 ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr \ params ip="192.168.1.10" cidr_netmask="32" nic="lo" \ op monitor interval="5s" primitive IPV-lo_6 ocf:heartbeat:IPv6addrLO \ params ipv6addr="[fc00:1::3]" cidr_netmask="64" \ op monitor interval="5s" primitive IPV_4 ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 \ params ip="192.168.1.10" nic="eth0" cidr_netmask="25" lvs_support="true" \ op monitor interval="5s" primitive IPV_6 ocf:heartbeat:IPv6addr \ params ipv6addr="[fc00:1::3]" nic="eth0" cidr_netmask="64" \ op monitor interval="5s" primitive lvs ocf:heartbeat:ldirectord \ params configfile="/etc/ldirectord.cf" \ op monitor interval="20" timeout="10" \ meta target-role="Started" group IPV_LVS IPV_4 IPV_6 lvs group IPV_lo IPV-lo_6 IPV-lo_4 clone clon_IPV_lo IPV_lo \ meta interleave="true" target-role="Started" location cli-prefer-IPV_LVS IPV_LVS \ rule $id="cli-prefer-rule-IPV_LVS" inf: #uname eq ldap1 colocation LVS_no_IPV_lo -inf: clon_IPV_lo IPV_LVS property $id="cib-bootstrap-options" \ dc-version="1.1.7-ee0730e13d124c3d58f00016c3376a1de5323cff" \ cluster-infrastructure="openais" \ expected-quorum-votes="2" \ no-quorum-policy="ignore" \ stonith-enabled="false" \ last-lrm-refresh="1401264327" rsc_defaults $id="rsc-options" \ resource-stickiness="1000" The problem is in the ipvsadm only show a one real IP, when i configured two now, show the ldirector.cf: root@ldap1:/home/mamartin# ipvsadm IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096) Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags - RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn TCP ldap-maqueta.cica.es:ldap wrr - ldap2.cica.es:ldap Route 4 0 0 TCP [[fc00:1::3]]:ldap wrr - [[fc00:1::2]]:ldap Route 4 0 0 root@ldap1:/home/mamartin# cat /etc/ldirectord.cf checktimeout=10 checkinterval=2 autoreload=yes logfile="/var/log/ldirectord.log" quiescent=yes #ipv4 virtual=192.168.1.10:389 real=192.168.1.11:389 gate 4 real=192.168.1.12:389 gate 4 scheduler=wrr protocol=tcp checktype=on #ipv6 virtual6=[[fc00:1::3]]:389 real6=[[fc00:1::1]]:389 gate 4 real6=[[fc00:1::2]]:389 gate 4 scheduler=wrr protocol=tcp checkport=389 checktype=on and in the logs I see nothing clear: root@ldap1:/home/mamartin# ldirectord -d /etc/ldirectord.cf start DEBUG2: Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.1.10:389 -r 192.168.1.11:389 -g -w 0) Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.1.10:389 -r 192.168.1.11:389 -g -w 0) DEBUG2: Quiescent real server: 192.168.1.11:389 (192.168.1.10:389) (Weight set to 0) Quiescent real server: 192.168.1.11:389 (192.168.1.10:389) (Weight set to 0) DEBUG2: Disabled real server=on:tcp:192.168.1.11:389:::4:gate:\/: (virtual=tcp:192.168.1.10:389) DEBUG2: Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.1.10:389 -r 192.168.1.12:389 -g -w 0) Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.1.10:389 -r 192.168.1.12:389 -g -w 0) DEBUG2: Quiescent real server: 192.168.1.12:389 (192.168.1.10:389) (Weight set to 0) Quiescent real server: 192.168.1.12:389 (192.168.1.10:389) (Weight set to 0) DEBUG2: Disabled real server=on:tcp:192.168.1.12:389:::4:gate:\/: (virtual=tcp:192.168.1.10:389) DEBUG2: Checking on: Real servers are added without any checks DEBUG2: Resetting soft failure count: 192.168.1.12:389 (tcp:192.168.1.10:389) Resetting soft failure count: 192.168.1.12:389 (tcp:192.168.1.10:389) DEBUG2: Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.1.10:389 -r 192.168.1.12:389 -g -w 4) Running system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.1.10:389 -r 192.168.1.12:389 -g -w 4) Destination already exists root@ldap1:/home/mamartin# cat /var/log/ldirectord.log [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Quiescent real server: 192.168.1.11:389 (192.168.1.10:389) (Weight set to 0) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Quiescent real server: 192.168.1.12:389 (192.168.1.10:389) (Weight set to 0) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Resetting soft failure count: 192.168.1.12:389 (tcp:192.168.1.10:389) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.1.10:389 -r 192.168.1.12:389 -g -w 4) failed: [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Added real server: 192.168.1.12:389 (192.168.1.10:389) (Weight set to 4) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Resetting soft failure count: 192.168.1.11:389 (tcp:192.168.1.10:389) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Restored real server: 192.168.1.11:389 (192.168.1.10:389) (Weight set to 4) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Resetting soft failure count: [[fc00:1::2]]:389 (tcp:[[fc00:1::3]]:389) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] system(/sbin/ipvsadm -a -t [[fc00:1::3]]:389 -r [[fc00:1::2]]:389 -g -w 4) failed: [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Added real server: [[fc00:1::2]]:389 ([[fc00:1::3]]:389) (Weight set to 4) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Resetting soft failure count: [[fc00:1::1]]:389 (tcp:[[fc00:1::3]]:389) [Tue Jun 3 09:39:29 2014|ldirectord.cf|19266] Restored real server: [[fc00:1::1]]:389 ([[fc00:1::3]]:389) (Weight set to 4) do not know if this is a bug or a configuration error, can anyone help? Regards.

    Read the article

  • Others users deleting my folders

    - by Abhiram
    Hi, I'm working in solaris server machine. More than 10 people are logged in to the same server machine.It take one hour for finishing the installation. But after the installation is over , some other user is deleting some of the directories and files in my installation folder. Is there any way to know who removed the files? Or atleast I want to know can I see the command history of other users.

    Read the article

  • Why are my Windows 7 updates continuously failing?

    - by Chris C.
    I'm an advanced level user here with an odd issue. I have two Windows Updates that are failing to install, every single time. I'm getting a mysterious "Code 1" error on both updates, an error for which I'm having difficulty finding a solution. The updates in question are: Security Update for Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Service Pack 1 Redistributable Package (KB2538243) System Update Readiness Tool for Windows 7 for x64-based Systems (KB947821) [May 2011] Because these updates are failing, the Shut Down button in my start menu always has the shield icon next to it, indicating that "new" updates will be installed on shut down. But, of course, they'll fail and when the PC is restarted, the shield icon is still there. When checking the update history and viewing the details of the failed updates, I get the following: Security Update for Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Service Pack 1 Redistributable Package (KB2538243) Installation date: ?6/?29/?2011 3:00 AM Installation status: Failed Error details: Code 1 Update type: Important A security issue has been identified leading to MFC application vulnerability in DLL planting due to MFC not specifying the full path to system/localization DLLs. You can protect your computer by installing this update from Microsoft. After you install this item, you may have to restart your computer. More information: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=216803 and: System Update Readiness Tool for Windows 7 for x64-based Systems (KB947821) [May 2011] Installation date: ?6/?28/?2011 3:00 AM Installation status: Failed Error details: Code 1 Update type: Important This tool is being offered because an inconsistency was found in the Windows servicing store which may prevent the successful installation of future updates, service packs, and software. This tool checks your computer for such inconsistencies and tries to resolve issues if found. More information: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/947821 About My System I'm running Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit. This is a custom PC build and the OS was installed fresh, not an upgrade from a previous version. I've been running this system for about four months. Windows Updates aside, the system is usually quite stable.

    Read the article

  • Windows XP - non-user input data filter message after installing wireless keyboard & mouse

    - by James
    After I installed MS wireless keyboard and mouse and associated software, I started getting this annoying message titled "Hardware installation" telling me the software I am trying to install did not pass the XP logo tests. The software is for "HID non-user input data filter" and I have two options Continue anyway or stop installation. Now, if I try to continue the installation fails, if stop installing another message pops up with a little mouse logo and the whole process repeats itself. after I am done with that message a third dialog appears. This is happening every time I boot up my PC (a desktop), I tried following an advice I found in some forum and download windows update for ID non-user input data filter, but that installation failed as well. The thing is, that both keyboard and mouse are working fine Is there anyway to get past these dialogs ?

    Read the article

  • Recommendation for a simple no-frills Windows PDF printer driver?

    - by Scott Bussinger
    I'm looking for an extremely simple Windows PDF printer driver that I can recommend to clients. Ideally it would have these characteristics: When you print something, it should just create it as a temporary file and then display it in their default PDF viewer with no prompting. If they want to save it, they can save it manually from inside the viewer. This workflow should be with no special post-install configuration. Installation should be very simple. A double click the installation program and click "Finish" sort of thing. No complicated multi-step installation, no asking questions your grandmother wouldn't know the answer to (preferably no questions at all), no extra crap being installed. An option for a completely silent installation would be nice, but not necessary. Ideally it would be free to simplify their installing on a small network, but low cost is an option. I've tried a quite a few but none really fit the bill. Some can achieve the first goal but only after careful configuration, some try to install extra toolbars, some have other installation complexities that would make it hard for extremely novice users to succeed. Any suggestions? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • I tried installing Ubuntu 10.04 and I got this message - any ideas on what to do?

    - by vette982
    No root file system defined. Please correct this from the partition menu. This message shows up when I first boot into Ubuntu after the installation. I installed it by mounting the ISO with Daemon Tools, and I just did the default Wubi installation. I keep reading everywhere that I need to choose my installation directory, but I don't get any option to do that. These are all the options I get for installation directory. I have a C and D partition on my drive, and I tried installing it on both and no luck either way. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • I tried installing Ubuntu 10.04 and I got this message - any ideas on what to do?

    - by user41926
    No root file system defined. Please correct this from the partition menu. This message shows up when I first boot into Ubuntu after the installation. I installed it by mounting the ISO with Daemon Tools, and I just did the default Wubi installation. I keep reading everywhere that I need to choose my installation directory, but I don't get any option to do that. These are all the options I get for installation directory. I have a C and D partition on my drive, and I tried installing it on both and no luck either way. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Black screen with cursor after BIOS screen

    - by Radio
    Here is a weird one, Got computer with Windows XP. It's getting stuck on a black screen with cursor blinking. What did I do: - Boot from installation CD (recovery option - command line): chkdsk C: /R copy D:\i386\ntdetect.com c:\ copy D:\i386\ntldr c:\ fixmbr fixboot Chkdsk showed 0 bad sectors and no problems during scan. dir on C:\ shows all directories and files in place (Windows, Program Files, Documents and Settings). BIOS shows correct boot drive. Still does not boot. Not sure what to think of. Please help. UPDATE: Just performed these steps: Backed up current disk C: (without MBR) using True Image to external hard drive Ran Windows XP clean installation with deleting all partitions and creating new one. Hard drive booted fine into Windows GUI installation!!! Then: I interrupted installation. Booted from True Image recovery CD and restored archive of disk C to an new partition. Same issue with black screen.

    Read the article

  • Installed Windows 7 without formatting disk? Possible?

    - by ile
    I've just installed Win7 but I'm little confused. When booting from XP cd, there is an option to format hard drive. After choosing which partition to format, format process takes usually not less than hour (depends on size of partition), but when I clicked on Format when in Windows 7 installation interface, I received some message (I cant remember what was it, but it was not any error message or something like that) and that was it. After that I choose to install Windows 7 and installation began. "Expanding Windows Files" was the longest process of installation. Was that the part when the hard drive was formatted? I don't understand what happened? Is it possible that my hard drive was not formatted but still installation was successful?

    Read the article

  • Where Is SilverLight Toolkit Installed On My PC?

    - by Gopinath
    This is first question that ran though my mind once I finished installation of SilverLight Toolkit today. When we install the toolkit, the installation wizard does not ask us for any installation folder options and after completion of installation there will not be any entries in to the All Programs section of start menu. After going through the documents, I found that installer silently places all the binaries, themes, samples documents under program files folder depending on the version of the toolkit. If you installed version 4.0 of the toolkit then it will be placed in the folder C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Silverlight\v4.0 Here is the list of other useful folder of SilverLight toolkit that we refer to often Bin  C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Silverlight\v4.0\Toolkit\Apr10\Bin   Samples  C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Silverlight\v4.0\Toolkit\Apr10\Samples   Themes  C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Silverlight\v4.0\Toolkit\Apr10\Themes   Source  C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Silverlight\v4.0\Toolkit\Apr10\Source Please note this above listed folder names will not be exactly same on your computer as they vary from one version to another. First open the base folder  C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Silverlight and then navigate through the available folders for locating the required ones. Hope this helps you. Join us on Facebook to read all our stories right inside your Facebook news feed.

    Read the article

  • libc-bin errors when trying to install php

    - by jonney
    i am trying to update and install php into my ubuntu server 12.04 using the command below: apt-get upgrade php apt-get install php5-curl php5-gd php5-mysql php5-pgsql However i receive this error all the time: gzip: stdout: No space left on device E: mkinitramfs failure cpio 141 gzip 1 update-initramfs: failed for /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-34-generic with 1. run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1 Failed to process /etc/kernel/postinst.d at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-3.2.0-34-generic.postinst line 1010. dpkg: error processing linux-image-3.2.0-34-generic (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-image-server: linux-image-server depends on linux-image-3.2.0-33-generic; however: Package linux-image-3.2.0-33-generic is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing linux-image-server (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-server: linux-server depends on linux-image-server (= 3.2.0.33.36); however: Package linux-image-server is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing linux-server (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Setting up libpq5 (9.1.10-0ubuntu12.04) ... No apport report written because the error message indicates it's a follow-up error from a previous failure. No apport report written because MaxReports has already been reached Setting up php5-curl (5.3.10-1ubuntu3.8) ... Setting up php5-pgsql (5.3.10-1ubuntu3.8) ... Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ... update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-32-generic gzip: stdout: No space left on device E: mkinitramfs failure cpio 141 gzip 1 update-initramfs: failed for /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-32-generic with 1. dpkg: error processing initramfs-tools (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 No apport report written because MaxReports has already been reached Processing triggers for libc-bin ... ldconfig deferred processing now taking place Errors were encountered while processing: linux-image-3.2.0-33-generic linux-image-3.2.0-34-generic linux-image-server linux-server initramfs-tools E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Not sure whats wrong and why it cant process the linux-image files?

    Read the article

  • Why does python easy install give me "permission denied" errors?

    - by Golden Sinha
    When i try to install program in ubuntu 12.04 it shows the error. program 1 : home@home-Compaq-610:~/Desktop$ python setup.py install running install running build running build_py creating build creating build/lib.linux-i686-2.7 copying Calculator.py - build/lib.linux-i686-2.7 running install_lib copying build/lib.linux-i686-2.7/Calculator.py - /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages error: /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Calculator.py: Permission denied . program 2 : home@home-Compaq-610:~/Desktop$ sudo chmod +x Moto.bin [sudo] password for home: home@home-Compaq-610:~/Desktop$ it shows like this but it do not install the program. program 3 : home@home-Compaq-610:~/Desktop$ python setup.py install [ERROR] wxPython2.8 is required. how to install wxPython2.8 please tell. if i try to install this program using easy_install it shows like this. home@home-Compaq-610:~/Desktop$ easy_install editra error: can't create or remove files in install directory The following error occurred while trying to add or remove files in the installation directory: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/test-easy-install-6778.pth' The installation directory you specified (via --install-dir, --prefix, or the distutils default setting) was: /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/ Perhaps your account does not have write access to this directory? If the installation directory is a system-owned directory, you may need to sign in as the administrator or "root" account. If you do not have administrative access to this machine, you may wish to choose a different installation directory, preferably one that is listed in your PYTHONPATH environment variable. For information on other options, you may wish to consult the documentation at: http://packages.python.org/distribute/easy_install.html Please make the appropriate changes for your system and try again. home@home-Compaq-610:~/Desktop$ please help me . please tell how to install programs..

    Read the article

  • MySQL - Configuration

    - by Stuart Brierley
    Having previously detailed how to install MySQL Server, the next step is configuring MySQL. The MySQL configuration wizard can either be run immediately following installation from the MySQL installation wizard or manually from the Start Menu. Following the splash screen you can then choose whether to run a detailed or standard configuration. The detailed configuration allows you to create the optimal configuration for your specific machine, whereas the standard configuration creates a general configuration that can then be manually tuned. I chose detailed.   You are then asked to choose the type of server instance that is being configured. In this case it is a developer machine. Following this you are asked to choose the type of database usage that you expect on the server. I opted for multifunctional. You must then specify the location of the InnoDB tablespace.   Next specify the number of concurent connections to the server.   Now you must configure the networking options. I left the Strict mode enabled as this is the recommended option, but I disabled TCP/IP networking as I wanted to restrict this MySQL installation to the local machine only.   Set the character set that is best suited to your use - for me this was the default standard character set. Next up is the option to run MySQL as a service and whether or not to include the mysql dircetories in the windows PATH. I kept the install as a windows service option enabled, but unchecked the Launch MySQL server automatically option. This is because I only wanted MySQL running when I specifically want to use it. I also enabled the include in windows PATH option.   You can then change the security settings for the mysql installation. I opted to change the root password, disable root from local machines and disable annoymous access.   You are now ready to execute the configuration.   Once completed you should hopefully see the completed screen with lots of nice ticks against the various configuration tasks.

    Read the article

  • All files on automounted NTFS partition are marked as executable

    - by MHC
    I have set up an NTFS partition to automount via fstab: # /etc/fstab: static file system information. # # Use 'blkid' to print the universally unique identifier for a # device; this may be used with UUID= as a more robust way to name devices # that works even if disks are added and removed. See fstab(5). # # <file system> <mount point> <type> <options> <dump> <pass> proc /proc proc nodev,noexec,nosuid 0 0 # / was on /dev/sda7 during installation UUID=e63fa8a2-432f-4749-b9db-dab328807d04 / ext4 errors=remount-ro 0 1 # /boot was on /dev/sda4 during installation UUID=e9ad1bb4-7c1f-4ea9-a6a5-799dfad71c0a /boot ext4 defaults 0 2 # /home was on /dev/sda8 during installation UUID=eda8c755-5448-4de8-b58c-9cb75823c22d /home ext4 defaults 0 2 # swap was on /dev/sda9 during installation UUID=804ff3a7-e5dd-406a-b63c-e8f3c635fbc5 none swap sw 0 0 #Windows-Partition UUID=368CEBC57807FDCD /media/Share ntfs defaults,uid=1000,gid=1000,noexec 0 0 As you can see I have added the noexec bit to the configuration. Why? Because any file I create on or move to the partition is automatically marked as executable. The problem is that there is no way of changing that through nautilus. I cannot uncheck the "Allow executing file as program" option. The noexec option doesn't help, unfortunately. It only prevents nautilus from displaying the "run" or "read" dialog but doesn't change the executable flag. Is there any way I can fix this?

    Read the article

  • exception occurred for backend host '127.0.0.1/7001/7001': 'CONNECTION_REFUSED [os error=0, line 1715 of URL.cpp]: Error connecting to host 127.0.0.1:7001'

    - by Vijaya Moderator -Oracle
    When you hit the WLS Server via Proxy server, we may get the issue like below... [09/Jun/2014:06:05:50] failure ( 3284): for host 127.0.0.1 trying to GET /.../soundlink_wireless_​speaker/index.jsp, wl-proxy reports: exception occurred for backend host '127.0.0.1/7001/0': 'PROTOCOL_ERROR [line 835 of URL.cpp]: Backend Server not responding' [09/Jun/2014:06:05:50] failure ( 3284): for host 127.0.0.1 trying to GET /.../soundlink_wireless_​speaker/index.jsp, wl-proxy reports: exception occurred for backend host '127.0.0.1/7001/0': 'PROTOCOL_ERROR [line 835 of URL.cpp]: Backend Server not responding' [09/Jun/2014:06:05:51] failure ( 3284): for host 127.0.0.1 trying to GET /.../soundlink_wireless_​speaker/index.jsp, wl-proxy reports: exception occurred for backend host '127.0.0.1/7001/7001': 'CONNECTION_REFUSED [os error=0, line 1715 of URL.cpp]: Error connecting to host 127.0.0.1:7001' To solve the issue 1.  Check if there is any issue at the firewall by executing the below command     telnet 127.0.0.1 7001 2.  Also access  using the hostname instead of IP Address  If it errors out like below   Microsoft Telnet> o 127.0.0.1 7001 connecting to 127.0.0.1  Warning thrown at weblogic console: <BEA-000449> <Closing socket as no data read from it on 127.0.0.1:54,356 during the configured idle timeout of 5 secs>  Test the same again by disabling the firewall. Below are the steps... 1)Go to Start ----> Run  2)Type services.msc  3)In services.msc search for "Windows Firewall" and Right Click on "Windows Firewall"---->Select Stop. 4)Access the Weblogic URL  If the issue is resolved after disabling firewall, Request your  OS System Admin to open the port 7001 at the firewall end to access the application

    Read the article

  • Reaping the Benefits of the Image Packaging System

    - by rickramsey
    source One of the promises made about Oracle Solaris 11 was easier installation. Remember? Do you also remember how involved installing Oracle Solaris Cluster used to be? It was so involved, in fact, that we (when we were Sun Microsystems) wouldn't even let you do it yourself. How times have changed. New - How to Automate The Installation of Oracle Solaris Cluster 4.0 Thanks to the new image packaging architecture in Oracle Solaris 11, you can now automate the installation of Oracle Solaris Cluster 4.0. Why is that such a big deal? As Lucia Lai explains it: "Without the AI, you would have to manually install the cluster components on the cluster nodes, and then run the scinstall tool to add the nodes to the cluster. If, instead, you use the AI, both the Oracle Solaris 11 and the Oracle Solaris Cluster 4.0 packages are installed onto the cluster nodes directly from Image Packaging System (IPS) repositories, and the nodes are booted into a new cluster with minimum user intervention." Lucia goes on to explain how to set up and configure the AI server, how to plan your cluster configuration for the automated installation, how to use the scinstall utility, how to set up the DHCP server, and more. A thorough, well-written article. - Rick Website Newsletter Facebook Twitter

    Read the article

  • Getting "Unable to find a medium containing a live file system" when installing 10.10

    - by Krastin Konstantinov
    I got this error while trying to install ubuntu 10.10 from a bootable USB stick on to Sony Vaio P series laptop. The disk boots into the language and installation type screen. After that it goes through the splash and pulls up this error: BusyBox v1.13.3 (Ubuntu 1:1.13.3-ubuntu11) built in shell (ash) Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands. (initramfs) Unable to find a medium containing a live file system After getting this error the installation fails to start. I have used the same USB stick on some other laptops and the installation started as usual. Any help will be appreciated. My installation is i386 and my machine is Vaio P VGN-P610. I've tried every possible thing: Bios: [enable boot external] Boot order: [external] [hard drive] [network boot] Tried 2 different USB drives Tried 2 different external CD drives Tried 6 different downloads of both the desktop and netbook remix. All downloads were checked with MD5SUM. Ubuntu Desktop 9.10 installs properly in every version and from every source. Getting reaaaally frustrated.

    Read the article

  • The tale of how the PowerShell CmdLets got installed with Azure SDK 1.4

    - by Enrique Lima
    I installed the Azure SDK 1.4 while rebuilding my laptop and ran the installation for the Windows Azure Service Management PowerShell CmdLets. Kicked off the installation script for the WASM PowerShell CmdLets by locating the path to which WASM PowerShell CmdLets was deployed to. Double clicked the startHere command. It will then open the WASM installation dialog. Click Next. Click Next. Notice the red x next to the Azure SDK 1.3, the problem is I have SDK 1.4 Here is the workaround, I go back to the location of the deployed WASM sources. Go into the setup path, then scripts>dependencies>check. Now, locate the CheckAzureSDK.ps1 file, and right-click, then edit. This is the content in the ps1 file, it check for the specific version of the Azure SDK, in this case, it is looking for version 1.3.11133.0038. We need for it to check for version 1.4.20227.1419 Now, save your ps1 file, go back to the open WASM install dialog, and click rescan. This time it should pass, then click next. A Command prompt window will appear, click any key. This completes the installation, click Close.

    Read the article

  • "Programming error" exceptions - Is my approach sound?

    - by Medo42
    I am currently trying to improve my use of exceptions, and found the important distinction between exceptions that signify programming errors (e.g. someone passed null as argument, or called a method on an object after it was disposed) and those that signify a failure in the operation that is not the caller's fault (e.g. an I/O exception). As far as I understand, it makes little sense for an immediate caller to actually handle programming error exceptions, he should instead assure that the preconditions are met. Only "outer" exception handlers at task boundaries should catch them, so they can keep the system running if a task fails. In order to ensure that client code can cleanly catch "failure" exceptions without catching error exceptions by mistake, I create my own exception classes for all failure exceptions now, and document them in the methods that throw them. I would make them checked exceptions in Java. Now I have a few questions: Before, I tried to document all exceptions that a method could throw, but that sometimes creates an unwiedly list that needs to be documented in every method up the call chain until you can show that the error won't happen. Instead, I document the preconditions in the summary / parameter descriptions and don't even mention what happens if they are not met. The idea is that people should not try to catch these exceptions explicitly anyway, so there is no need to document their types. Would you agree that this is enough? Going further, do you think all preconditions even need to be documented for every method? For example, calling methods in IDisposable objects after calling Dispose is an error, but since IDisposable is such a widely used interface, can I just assume a programmer will know this? A similar case is with reference type parameters where passing null makes no conceivable sense: Should I document "non-null" anyway? IMO, documentation should only cover things that are not obvious, but I am not sure where "obvious" ends.

    Read the article

  • Why does my root filesystem keep becoming read-only?

    - by Scott Severance
    I've lately been having an issue with my root filesystem becoming readonly. It happens some amount of time after boot. I don't know exactly when it happens, as I don't usually notice it until something such as suspending the computer or printing fails. It seems to be fairly random. Since most of my system is on that partition, I can't re-mount it without rebooting. After this happens, the system runs a fsck. Sometimes it prompts to fix problems; other times it apparently finds none. To troubleshoot, I've searched through the logs but found nothing relevant. This might be due in part to not knowing when the actual errors took place. The filesystem is apparently good to begin with, as when fsck runs its fixes it doesn't report any errors. I've scanned the disk with SpinRite. A while ago, SpinRite found and recovered from some bad sectors on the hard drive. I ran a level 4 scan (a thorough scan) after this probem appeared, but SpinRite found nothing. The SMART data reports that the disk is OK with 63 bad sectors. The number of bad sectors hasn't changed recently. I realize that the disk isn't in the best of conditions, and I have complete backups in case of catastrophic failure. Yet the lack of errors in the logs, combined with SpinRite's test results and the unchanged SMART data makes me think that this problem has some cause other than disk failure. Other than disk failure, what could cause my symptoms?

    Read the article

  • Create option to load Ubuntu or Windows 7 at start-up

    - by AXK
    We have a new Dell Optiplex 790 desktop with Windows 7 and just installed Ubuntu 12.04 on it using a USB stick that was configured as a boot drive. We created a new partition for Ubuntu during installation using the partition editor that comes up during installation. Everything seems to have gone fine with the installation except that, unexpectedly, there is no option to boot up Ubuntu when the computer is started. We just start the computer and Windows starts up with no option to ever start Ubuntu. The only way we have gotten Ubuntu to start is by putting the USB stick used for installation back into the computer and having the computer boot from it. Then GRUB shows up and the Ubuntu OS that we installed starts up (rather than the live-CD version on the USB stick). Previous times we have installed Ubuntu, GRUB shows up when we start the computer and we can choose among the various OSes installed. Can anyone suggest what to do? We want to have the option to launch either Windows 7 or Ubuntu 12.04 when we start the computer, with the default being Windows 7. Right now there is no option and Windows 7 just starts the way it did before we installed Ubuntu. Note that if we hit F1 soon after starting the computer, we get some sort of Windows bootloader (not sure of exact name) but there is no option for Ubuntu; just Windows 7. Also note that if we hit the shift key soon after starting the computer, as some help pages have suggested, nothing happens (Windows 7 is loaded as usual). Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Booting Ubuntu 12.04 from external eSATA disk

    - by Lord of Scripts
    This is my system topology: Disk #1 (SATA Internal) C: D: (Windows 7 Ultimate) Disk #2 (SATA Internal) E: (Windows Backup) Disk #3 (eSATA External) H: I: (Other windows data) /dev/sdc3 Linux Swap /dev/sdc4 Extended partition /dev/sdc5 Linux / So, I originally had there Ubuntu 8.1 from years ago but never got to use it. Now I used the Ubuntu 12.04 Live CD to install on that same location (That live CD takes a century to boot on a 6GB Intel i7 system...). The installation went fine, I selected it to install on /dev/sdc5 but it never asked me for any boot stuff, where I wanted to install Grub or whatever it is that it uses nowaways (I come from the LILO days when it always worked :-) So, yet again I can't access my new Linux installation. I have to wait a century to boot the "Live" CD and it allows me to see my new installation but I can't do anything with it. I tried the approach of this blog post. Copied the linux.bin of /dev/sdc5 into C: and used the BCDEdit steps to declare the new OS. So when I boot I see the Windows Boot menu and select Linux and after than I only get a black screen with a blinking cursor on the upper left. I can boot into Windows though. So, perhaps it didn't install the boot code on /dev/sdc5? I used this setup years ago booting from Windows with a BIN file: dd if=/dev/sdc5 of=/mnt/share/C/linux.bin bs=512 count=1 I am very reluctant to run GRUB because years ago I did and it wiped out my Windows boot sector and took quite some effort to recover it and be able to boot Windows again. I have been trying to install GRUB on a blank USB stick but I can't find anything clear enough. My system does NOT have a floppy. So can someone give me some ideas about how to get control of my Ubuntu 12.04 installation?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181  | Next Page >