Search Results

Search found 6276 results on 252 pages for 'join in'.

Page 178/252 | < Previous Page | 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185  | Next Page >

• How to always return a set number of records when using find_related_tags with acts-as-taggable-on

  - by hadees

  I'm using the acts-as-taggable-on gem and I need to use find_related_tags on my survey model to get back 3 surveys every time. In the event there aren't always 3 related I need to pick how ever many are related plus some random ones to get to 3. Additionally I have a method I wrote called completed_survey_ids which return an array of survey_ids that shouldn't be used because the user has already completed them. Also there is a rare case that there won't be enough surveys because the user has completed them all so in that event it is okay to return less surveys then requested. I did write a named_scope to handle getting rid of the completed_survey_ids that I think works named_scope :not, lambda { |survey_ids| {:conditions => "id NOT IN (#{survey_ids.join(',')})" } }

  Read the article

• What are your favorite extension methods for C#? (codeplex.com/extensionoverflow)

  - by bovium

  Let's make a list of answers where you post your excellent and favorite extension methods. The requirement is that the full code must be posted and a example and an explanation on how to use it. Based on the high interest in this topic I have setup an Open Source Project called extensionoverflow on Codeplex. Please mark your answers with an acceptance to put the code in the Codeplex project. Please post the full sourcecode and not a link. Codeplex News: 11.11.2008 XmlSerialize / XmlDeserialize is now Implemented and Unit Tested. 11.11.2008 There is still room for more developers. ;-) Join NOW! 11.11.2008 Third contributer joined ExtensionOverflow, welcome to BKristensen 11.11.2008 FormatWith is now Implemented and Unit Tested. 09.11.2008 Second contributer joined ExtensionOverflow. welcome to chakrit. 09.11.2008 We need more developers. ;-) 09.11.2008 ThrowIfArgumentIsNull in now Implemented and Unit Tested on Codeplex.

  Read the article

• How to make query on a property from a joined table in Hibernate using Criteria

  - by Palo

  Hello, I have the following mapping: <hibernate-mapping package="server.modules.stats.data"> <class name="User" table="user"> <id name="id"> <generator class="native"></generator> </id> <many-to-one name="address" column="addressId" unique="true" lazy="false" /> </class> <class name="Address" table="address"> <id name="id"> <generator class="native"></generator> </id> <property name="street" /> </class> </hibernate-mapping> How can I do a Criteria query to select all users living on some street? That is create Criteria query for this SQL: Select * from user join address on user.addressId = address.id where address.street='someStreet'

  Read the article

• How to dynamically modify NHibernate load queries at runtime? EventListeners? Interceptors?

  - by snicker

  I need to modify the query used to load many-to-one references in my model. Specifically, I need to be able to further filter this data. Unfortunately, NH will not allow me to filter many-to-one relationships using the built in filtering system (?). I could just be doing something incorrect. Is there a hook where I can manually and dynamically modify the query used to load the data? Or an alternative to filters that will allow me to specify parameters? Background: I am working with a database that is using a form of revision control, with each entity having a natural ID PK, an EntityId, a RevisionValidTo and RevisionValidFrom field. There may be many rows using the same EntityId, which is the reference for other tables to join on, but the Revision ranges are mutually exclusive. Thus, the relationship is only many-to-one IIF the filter is applied. However, NH offers no way to specify a filter on many-to-one references (they do for collections...)

  Read the article

• sql server swap data between rows problem

  - by AmRoSH

  I was asking b4 about swaping query to swap data between rows in same table and i got that qurey ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[VehicleReservationsSwap] -- Add the parameters for the stored procedure here (@FirstVehicleID int, @secondVehicleID int, @WhereClause nvarchar(2000)) AS BEGIN Create Table #Temp ( VehicleID int ,VehicleType nvarchar(100) ,JoinId int ) DECLARE @SQL varchar(8000) SET @SQL ='Insert into #Temp (VehicleID,VehicleType,JoinId) SELECT VehicleID,VehicleType,CASE WHEN VehicleID = ' + Cast(@FirstVehicleID as varchar(10)) + ' then ' + Cast(@secondVehicleID as varchar(10)) + ' ELSE ' + Cast(@FirstVehicleID as varchar(10)) + ' END AS JoinId FROM Reservations WHERE VehicleID in ( ' + Cast(@FirstVehicleID as varchar(10)) + ' , ' + Cast(@secondVehicleID as varchar(10)) + ' )' + @WhereClause EXEC(@SQL) --swap values UPDATE y SET y.VehicleID = #Temp.VehicleID ,y.VehicleType = #Temp.VehicleType FROM Reservations y INNER JOIN #Temp ON y.VehicleID = #Temp.JoinId WHERE y.VehicleID in (@FirstVehicleID,@secondVehicleID) Drop Table #Temp END this query take 2 parameters and swaping all rows returned for each parameter. the problem is the query swaps just if each parameter (forign key) has values I need to make swaping in case if one of them has no vlue. I hope if some one can help me in that . Thanks,

  Read the article

• Removing duplicate SQL records to permit a unique key

  - by j pimmel

  I have a table ('sales') in a MYSQL DB which should have rightfully have had a unique constraint enforced to prevent duplicates. To first remove the dupes and set the constraint is proving a bit tricky. Table structure (simplified): 'id (unique, autoinc)' product_id The goal is to enforce uniqueness for product_id. The de-duping policy I want to apply is to remove all duplicate records except the most recently created, eg: the highest id Or to put another way, I would like to delete duplicate records, excluding the ids matched by the following query: select id from sales s inner join (select product_id, max(id) as maxId from sales group by product_id having count(product_id) > 1) groupedByProdId on s.product_id and s.id = groupedByProdId.maxId I've struggled with this on two fronts - writing the query to select the correct records to delete and then also the constraint in MYSQL where a subselect FROM clause of a DELETE cannot reference the same table from which data is being removed.

  Read the article

• Where can I find a jQuery color animation plugin?

  - by George Edison

  I need an up-to-date jQuery color animation plugin that works in IE 8. I tried using the one at http://plugins.jquery.com/project/color but it causes errors like "Invalid property value." in the following line of code from color.js: fx.elem.style[attr] = "rgb(" + [ Math.max(Math.min( parseInt((fx.pos * (fx.end[0] - fx.start[0])) + fx.start[0]), 255), 0), Math.max(Math.min( parseInt((fx.pos * (fx.end[1] - fx.start[1])) + fx.start[1]), 255), 0), Math.max(Math.min( parseInt((fx.pos * (fx.end[2] - fx.start[2])) + fx.start[2]), 255), 0) ].join(",") + ")"; Where can I get something that works? By the way, I really hate IE, if that helps.

  Read the article

• How to order results based on number of search term matches?

  - by Travis

  I am using the following tables in mysql to describe records that can have multiple searchtags associated with them: TABLE records ID title desc TABLE searchTags ID name TABLE recordSearchTags recordID searchTagID To SELECT records based on arbitrary search input, I have a statement that looks sort of like this: SELECT recordID FROM recordSearchTags LEFT JOIN searchTags ON recordSearchTags.searchTagID = searchTags.ID WHERE searchTags.name LIKE CONCAT('%','$search1','%') OR searchTags.name LIKE CONCAT('%','$search2','%') OR searchTags.name LIKE CONCAT('%','$search3','%') OR searchTags.name LIKE CONCAT('%','$search4','%'); I'd like to ORDER this resultset, so that rows that match with more search terms are displayed in front of rows that match with fewer search terms. For example, if a row matches all 4 search terms, it will be top of the list. A row that matches only 2 search terms will be somewhere in the middle. And a row that matches just one search term will be at the end. Any suggestions on what is the best way to do this? Thanks!

  Read the article

• Doubt in Stored Procedure MySql - how to return multiple values for a variable ?

  - by Eternal Learner

  Hi, I have a stored procedure below. I intend this procedure to return the names of all the movies acted by an actor. Create Procedure ActorMovies( In ScreenName varchar(50), OUT Title varchar(50) ) BEGIN Select MovieTitle INTO Title From Movies Natural Join Acts where Acts.ScreenName = 'ScreenName '; End; I make a call like Call ActorMovies(' Jhonny Depp',@movie); Select @move; The result I get is a Null set , which is not correct.I am expecting a set of movies acted by Jhonny Depp to be returned. I am not sure as to why this is happening?

  Read the article

• Oracle/c#: How do i use bind variables with select statements to return multiple records?

  - by twiga

  I have a question regarding Oracle bind variables and select statements. What I would like to achieve is do a select on a number different values for the primary key. I would like to pass these values via an array using bind values. select * from tb_customers where cust_id = :1 int[] cust_id = { 11, 23, 31, 44 , 51 }; I then bind a DataReader to get the values into a table. The problem is that the resulting table only contains a single record (for cust_id=51). Thus it seems that each statement is executed independently (as it should), but I would like the results to be available as a collective (single table). A workaround is to create a temporary table, insert all the values of cust_id and then do a join against tb_customers. The problem with this approach is that I would require temporary tables for every different type of primary key, as I would like to use this against a number of tables (some even have combined primary keys). Is there anything I am missing?

  Read the article

• Allowing New Users to Invite Their Gmail Contacts

  - by John

  Hello, For my site, I would like to give new users the option to invite all of their Gmail contacts to join. What is the basic step-by-step process to set this up? (Also, is it necessary to buy an SSL for this?) Thanks in advance, John EDIT: My site has a basic login where users set up a username and password. I would like to give users the option to invite their Gmail contacts right after they create their new profile. I would also like to give them the option to invite their Gmail contacts anytime they want.

  Read the article

• Nested sql queries in rails when :has_and_belongst_to_many

  - by Godisemo

  Hello, In my application I the next task that has not already been done by a user. I have Three models, A Book that has many Tasks and then I have a User that has has and belongs to many tasks. The table tasks_users table contains all completed tasks so I need to write a complex query to find the next task to perform. I have came up with two solutions in pure SQL that works, but I cant translate them to rails, thats what I need help with SELECT * FROM `tasks` WHERE `tasks`.`book_id` = @book_id AND `tasks`.`id` NOT IN ( SELECT `tasks_users`.`task_id` FROM `tasks_users` WHERE `tasks_users`.`user_id` = @user_id) ORDER BY `task`.`date` ASC LIMIT 1; and equally without nested select SELECT * FROM tasks LEFT JOIN tasks_users ON tasks_users.tasks_id = task.id AND tasks_users.user_id = @user_id WHERE tasks_users.task_id IS NULL AND tasks.book_id = @book_id LIMIT 1; This is what I Have done in rails with the MetaWhere plugin book.tasks.joins(:users.outer).where(:users => {:id => nil}) but I cant figure out how to get the current user there too, Thanks for any help!

  Read the article

• How do I list all non-system stored procedures?

  - by bubbassauro

  I want to create a query to list of all user defined stored procedures, excluding the ones that are system stored procedures, considering that: Checking the name like "sp_" doesn't work because there are user stored procedures that start with "sp_". Checking the property is_ms_shipped doesn't work because there are system stored procedures that have that flag = 0, for example: sp_alterdiagram (it is not MSShipped but appears under System Stored Procedures in SQL Server Management Studio). There must be a property, or a flag somewhere since you can see the "System Stored Procedures" in a separate folder in SQL 2005. Does anyone know? Edit: A combination of the suggestions below worked for me: select * from sys.objects O LEFT OUTER JOIN sys.extended_properties E ON O.object_id = E.major_id WHERE O.name IS NOT NULL AND ISNULL(O.is_ms_shipped, 0) = 0 AND ISNULL(E.name, '') <> 'microsoft_database_tools_support' AND O.type_desc = 'SQL_STORED_PROCEDURE' ORDER BY O.name

  Read the article

• Nested Select in Rails

  - by James

  I am working on a Rails application which uses categories for items. My category model is self-joined so that categories can be nested: class Category < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :items # Self Join (categories can have subcategories) has_many :subcategories, :class_name => "Category", :foreign_key => "parent_id" belongs_to :parent, :class_name => "Category" ... end I have a form which allows a user to create an item which currently lists all categories in a select, but they are all listed together: <%= f.label :category_id %> <%= select :item, :category_id, Category.all.collect {|c| [ c.title, c.id ]} %> So the select looks something like this: Category1 Category2 Category3BelongsTo2 Category4BelongsTo1 But what I want is: Category1 - Category4BelongsTo1 Category2 - Category3BelongsTo2 Is there a helper for this (which would be awesome!)? If not, how could I accomplish this? Thanks!

  Read the article

• Converting MySQL Resultset from Rows to Columns

  - by gms8994

  I have output from a select like this: 04:47:37> select * from attributes left outer join trailer_attributes on attributes.id = trailer_attributes.attribute_id; +----+--------------+----------+-----------+------------+--------------+-----------------+ | id | name | datatype | list_page | trailer_id | attribute_id | attribute_value | +----+--------------+----------+-----------+------------+--------------+-----------------+ | 1 | Make | text | 1 | 1 | 1 | Apple | | 1 | Make | text | 1 | 2 | 1 | sdfg | | 2 | Year | number | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2009 | | 2 | Year | number | 1 | 2 | 2 | sdfg | | 3 | Type | text | 0 | 1 | 3 | iPhone | | 3 | Type | text | 0 | 2 | 3 | sdfg | | 4 | Axles | text | 0 | 1 | 4 | asdf | | 4 | Axles | text | 0 | 2 | 4 | sdfg | | 7 | Size | text | 0 | 1 | 7 | asd1 | | 7 | Size | text | 0 | 2 | 7 | sdfg | | 8 | Frame | text | 0 | 1 | 8 | | | 8 | Frame | text | 0 | 2 | 8 | sdfg | | 9 | Height | text | 0 | 1 | 9 | | | 9 | Height | text | 0 | 2 | 9 | sdfg | | 10 | Dollies | text | 0 | 1 | 10 | | | 10 | Dollies | text | 0 | 2 | 10 | sdfg | | 11 | Tires/Wheels | text | 0 | 1 | 11 | | | 11 | Tires/Wheels | text | 0 | 2 | 11 | sdfg | | 12 | Condition | text | 1 | 1 | 12 | New | | 12 | Condition | text | 1 | 2 | 12 | sdfg | | 13 | Title | text | 0 | 1 | 13 | | | 13 | Title | text | 0 | 2 | 13 | sdfg | +----+--------------+----------+-----------+------------+--------------+-----------------+ I want to convert it to something more along the lines of: id, Make, Year, Type, Axles, Size, Frame (etc) 1, Apple, 2009, iPhone, ..... 2, sdfg, sdfg, sdfg, ..... Any suggestions?

  Read the article

• Insert query results into table in ms access 2010

  - by CodeMed

  I need to transform data from one schema into another in an MS Access database. This involves writing queries to select data from the old schema and then inserting the results of the queries into tables in the new schema. The below is an example of what I am trying to do. The SELECT component of the below works fine, but the INSERT component does not work. Can someone show me how to fix the below so that it effectively inserts the results of the SELECT statement into the destination table? INSERT INTO CompaniesTable (CompanyName) VALUES ( SELECT DISTINCT IIF(a.FIRM_NAME IS NULL, b.SUBACCOUNT_COMPANY_NAME, a.FIRM_NAME) AS CompanyName FROM (SELECT ContactID, FIRM_NAME, SUBACCOUNT_COMPANY_NAME FROM qrySummaryData) AS a LEFT JOIN (SELECT ContactID, FIRM_NAME, SUBACCOUNT_COMPANY_NAME FROM qrySummaryData) AS b ON a.ContactID = b.ContactID ); The definition of the target table (CompaniesTable) is: CompanyID Autonumber CompanyName Text Description Text WebSite Text Email Text TypeNumber Number

  Read the article

• how to get the checked id's and unchekced ids using jquery

  - by kumar

  Hello friends using this code I am to get only checked id $('#PbtnSubmit').click(function(event) { $('#PricingEditExceptions input[name=PMchk]').each(function() { if ($("#PricingEditExceptions input:checkbox:checked").length > 0) { var checked = $('#PricingEditExceptions input[type=checkbox]:checked'); var PMstrIDs = checked.map(function() { return $(this).val(); }).get().join(','); $('#1_exceptiontypes').attr('value', exceptiontypes) $('#1_PMstrIDs').attr('value', PMstrIDs); } else { alert("Please select atleast one exception"); event.preventDefault(); } }); }); the beginForm <% using (Html.BeginForm("MassUpdate", "Pricing", FormMethod.Post, new { @id = "exc-"})) I am perfectly getting all my chekced id's to the controler but I need to get both checked as well as uncheked ids' using above code? thanks

  Read the article

• Normalise this Table?

  - by Abs

  Hello all, I am creating a social bookmarking app. I am having a re-thought of the DB design in the middle of development. Should I normalise the bookmarks table and remove the tag columns that I have into a separate table. I have 10 tags per bookmark and therefore 10 columns per record (per bookmark). It seems to me that breaking the table into two would just mean I would have to do a join but the way I currently have it, its a straight select - but the table doesn't feel right...? Thanks all

  Read the article

• how to get external variable value in dtsx package.

  - by Rishabh

  Hi, I am executing .dtsx package from c#, it was executing fine, if i am passing one variable value from c# code then how can i get it on .dtsx package for my ole db source query. Here is my c# code. string file = @"D:\CYNCZFuzzy\CYNCZFuzzy\Contact.dtsx"; package = app.LoadPackage(file, null); Variables vars = package.Variables; vars["User::parentContactID"].Value = 1028203; pkgResults = package.Execute(); string result = pkgResults.ToString(); I need this 1028203 value on my ole db source query, here my query. select cr.MasterContactID as ParentContactID, c.ID,C.FirstName, C.MiddleName, c.LastName, c.ID as FieldID from Contact c inner join ContactRelation cr on cr.SlaveContactID = c.ID where RelationshipID = 1 AND cr.MasterContactID = ? what I should write on ? for getting 1028203 value from c# page. Thanks in advance...

  Read the article

• Exception handling in Linq to SQL for customers without orders

  - by stackoverflowuser

  I have the following code to retrieve customer name, total (orders ), sum (order details) for reach customer in Northwind database. The problem with below code is that it raises an exception since a few customers dont have any entry in orders table. I know using the query syntax (join) the exception can be avoided. I want to know if the same can be handled with the extension method syntax. var customerOrders = db.Customers .Select(c => new { CompanyName = c.CompanyName, TotalOrders = c.Orders.Count(), TotalQuantity = c.Orders .SelectMany(o => o.Order_Details).Sum(o=>o.Quantity) });

  Read the article

• How to sum up an array of integers in C#

  - by Filburt

  Is there a better shorter way than iterating over the array? int[] arr = new int[] { 1, 2, 3 }; int sum = 0; for (int i = 0; i < arr.Length; i++) { sum += arr[i]; } clarification: Better primary means cleaner code but hints on performance improvement are also welcome. (Like already mentioned: splitting large arrays). It's not like I was looking for killer performance improvement - I just wondered if this very kind of syntactic sugar wasn't already available: "There's String.Join - what the heck about int[]?".

  Read the article

• The use of GROUP BY in MySQL

  - by Gustav Bertram

  I'm fishing for a comprehensive and canonical answer for the typical "mysql group by?" question. Here is some sample data: TABLE A +------+------+----------+-----+ | id | foo | bar | baz | +------+------+----------+-----+ | 1 | 1 | hello | 42 | | 2 | 0 | apple | 96 | | 3 | 20 | boot | 11 | | 4 | 31 | unicorn | 99 | | 5 | 19 | pumpkin | 11 | | 6 | 88 | orange | 13 | +------+------+----------+-----+ TABLE B +------+------+ | id | moo | +------+------+ | 1 | 1 | | 2 | 99 | | 3 | 11 | +------+------+ Demonstrate and explain the correct use of the GROUP BY clause in MySQL. Touch upon the following points: The use of MIN, MAX, SUM, AVG The use of HAVING Grouping by date, and ranges of dates Grouping with an ORDER BY Grouping with a JOIN Grouping on multiple columns Bonus points for references to other great answers, the MySQL online manual, and online tutorials on GROUP BY.

  Read the article

• Type or namespace name could not be found

  - by Pandiya Chendur

  I use this: public IQueryable<MaterialsView> FindAllMaterials() { var materials = from m in db.Materials join Mt in db.MeasurementTypes on m.MeasurementTypeId equals Mt.Id select new MaterialsView { MatId = m.Mat_Name, MesName = Mt.Name, MesType = m.Mat_Type }; return materials; } It gives me the following errors: The type or namespace name MaterialsView could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) Cannot implicitly convert type System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<MaterialsView> to System.Linq.IQueryable<MaterialsView>. An explicit conversion exists (are you missing a cast?) The type arguments for method System.Linq.Enumerable.ToList<TSource>(System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<TSource>) cannot be inferred from the usage. Try specifying the type arguments explicitly. I have googled it and found this SO question but it doesn't help. What's wrong?

  Read the article

• VendInvoiceJour.InvoiceAccount <- VendTable.AccountNum relation

  - by vukis

  Hi. I have following situation: I need to join VendInvoiceJour.InvoiceAccount <- VendTable.AccountNum and take VendTable.Vendgroup. In all cases (queries,or even views) Dynamics ax joins tables VendInvoiceJour.OrderAccount<- VendTable.AccountNum not VendInvoiceJour.InvoiceAccount <- VendTable.AccountNum. I`m trying to use this kind of query: qBdSVendJour = element.query().dataSourceTable(tablenum(VendInvoiceJour)); qBdSVendTbl = qBdSVendJour.addDataSource(tablenum(VendTable)); qBdSVendTbl.relations(true); qBdSVendTbl.joinMode(JoinMOde::InnerJoin); qBdSVendTbl.fetchMode(QueryFetchMode::One2One); qBdSVendTbl.addLink(FieldNum(VendInvoiceJour,InvoiceAccount),FieldNum(VendTable,AccountNum));//(Dynamics ax automaticaly corrects InvoiceAccount to orderaccount in reports if trying this link in morphx)

  Read the article

• Using Routing helpers in a Rake task

  - by trobrock

  I have a rake task that sends out the next 'x' invitations to join a beta it uses this code: desc "This will send out the next batch of invites for the beta" task :send_invites => :environment do limit = ENV['limit'] c = 0 invitation = Invitation.all(:conditions => { :sent_at => nil, :sender_id => nil }, :limit => limit).each do |i| Mailer.deliver_invitation(i, register_url(i.token)) c.increment! end puts "Sent #{c} invitations." end I need to pass in the 'register_url' to the Mailer in order for the link to show up in the email, but since this is running from a rake task and not from a request it does not have a access to the helper methods. What is the best way of achieving this?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185  | Next Page >