Search Results

Search found 45806 results on 1833 pages for 'add apt repository'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 18/1833 | < Previous Page | 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25  | Next Page >

  • Selective Checkout or a View, on a project in repository

    - by Yossi Zach
    I have a bunch of interconnected projects which share the same project tree. I'm looking for a version control system which provides a possibility to checkout a subset of the project tree. If my the full project tree looks like this: Project Root |-Feature1 | |-SubFeature11 | \-SubFeature12 |-Feature2 | |-SubFeature21 | \-SubFeature22 |-file1 \-file2 I want be able to checkout only subset like this: Project Root |-Feature1 | \-SubFeature12 |-Feature2 | \-SubFeature22 |-file1 \-file2 So do you know any version control system that allows to do selective checkout or a view on a repository?

    Read the article

  • How should I structure my repository classes?

    - by Innogetics
    I am new to DDD. In my mini-project, I have a structure that looks like this (different from the actual names): EntryClassificationGroup EntryClassification Entry EntryType Should I have just one repository class for all these 4 entities, since they are all related? Or should I have individual repositories for each one?

    Read the article

  • How does one mirror a maven repository?

    - by Randy
    Our company would like to mirror our Maven 2 Repository inside of the Amazon network. What software should one use to do this? We have looked into a Wagon-S3 but that sort of functionality is not desirable... we want the artifacts to already be present when we are ready for a build.

    Read the article

  • Repository Pattern : Add Item

    - by No Body
    Just need to clarify this one, If I have the below interface public interface IRepository<T> { T Add(T entity); } when implementing it, does checking for duplication if entity is already existing before persist it is still a job of the Repository, or it should handle some where else?

    Read the article

  • Persistent "held broken packages" error

    - by stoplan
    sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install netflix-desktop gives the error The following packages have unmet dependencies: netflix-desktop : Depends: wine-browser-installer but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. but dpkg --get-selections | grep hold shows nothing. I'm running 12.04 64-bit. I've followed the directions in How do I resolve unmet dependencies?: Confirmed that main, universe, restricted and multiverse software sources are enabled sudo apt-get clean sudo apt-get -f install (returning '0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.') sudo dpkg --configure -a sudo apt-get -f install (again '0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.) sudo apt-get -u dist-upgrade (0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.) used Y PPA Manager to check for duplicate ppas (none found) [Edit] I have had the same error with other packages. Here's the output requested by Alaa: sudo apt-get install wine-browser-installer Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: wine-browser-installer : Depends: wine-compholio (= 1.5.19~precise1) E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.

    Read the article

  • create a .deb Package from scripts or binaries

    - by tdeutsch
    I searched for a simple way to create .deb Packages for things which have no source code to compile (configs, shellscripts, proprietary software). This was quite a problem because most of the package tutorials are assuming you have a source tarball you want to compile. Then I've found this short tutorial (german). Afterwards, I created a small script to create a simple repository. Like this: rm /export/my-repository/repository/* cd /home/tdeutsch/deb-pkg for i in $(ls | grep my); do dpkg -b ./$i /export/my-repository/repository/$i.deb; done cd /export/avanon-repository/repository gpg --armor --export "My Package Signing Key" > PublicKey apt-ftparchive packages ./ | gzip > Packages.gz apt-ftparchive packages ./ > Packages apt-ftparchive release ./ > /tmp/Release.tmp; mv /tmp/Release.tmp Release gpg --output Release.gpg -ba Release I added the key to the apt keyring and included the source like this: deb http://my.default.com/my-repository/ ./ It looks like the repo itself is working well (I ran into some problems, to fix them I needed to add the Packages twice and make the temp-file workaround for the Release file). I also put some downloaded .deb into the repo, it looks like they are also working without problems. But my self created packages didn't... Wenn i do sudo apt-get update, they are causing errors like this: E: Problem parsing dependency Depends E: Error occurred while processing my-printerconf (NewVersion2) E: Problem with MergeList /var/lib/apt/lists/my.default.com_my-repository_._Packages E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened. Has anyone an idea what I did wrong?

    Read the article

  • What do I do for dependencies installing wine1.7 on 14.04

    - by user285207
    user@chrubuntu:~$ sudo apt-get install wine1.7 [sudo] password for user: user Sorry, try again. [sudo] password for user: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: wine1.7 : Depends: wine1.7-i386 (= 1:1.7.19-0ubuntu2~trusty2) but it is not installable Recommends: gnome-exe-thumbnailer but it is not going to be installed or kde-runtime but it is not going to be installed Recommends: ttf-mscorefonts-installer but it is not going to be installed Recommends: fonts-horai-umefont but it is not going to be installed Recommends: fonts-unfonts-core but it is not going to be installed Recommends: ttf-wqy-microhei Recommends: winetricks but it is not going to be installed E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. user@chrubuntu:~$ Trying to install wine1.7 on Ubuntu 14.04 64 bit, and i'm not sure what this means, help is greatly appreciated. I already ran sudo apt-get update and get this: Reading package lists... Done W: Duplicate sources.list entry http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/ stable/main amd64 Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/dl.google.com_linux_chrome_deb_dists_stable_main_binary-amd64_Packages) W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems So I run apt-get update and: E: Could not open lock file /var/lib/apt/lists/lock - open (13: Permission denied) E: Unable to lock directory /var/lib/apt/lists/ E: Could not open lock file /var/lib/dpkg/lock - open (13: Permission denied) E: Unable to lock the administration directory (/var/lib/dpkg/), are you root? This is all very stressing because I have been trying to get Wine for the past week and had to reinstall and IT STILL WON'T WORK.

    Read the article

  • Unable to install ZFS (Ubuntu 13.10)

    - by user209707
    I'm fairly new to Ubuntu and wanted to setup a server running ZFS/XBMC - The XBMC install went fine, however I ran into trouble getting ZFS working. Configuration : Ubuntu 13.10 (GNU/Linux 3.12.0-rc7+ x86_64) I attempted to install ZFS native using : sudo add-apt-repository ppa:zfs-native/stable sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install ubuntu-zfs This failed to install due to "Module build for the currently running kernel was skipped since the kernel source for this kernel does not seem to be installed." Trying sudo modprobe zfs shows FATAL error : module not found. Here, they mentioned it was to do with lacking build dependences- I followed the answer which was to run sudo apt-get remove --purge ubuntu-zfs zfs-dkms zfsutils spl spl-dkms libzfs1 dkms Then, REBOOT. Then, do: sudo apt-get install linux-headers-generic build-essentia sudo apt-get install ubuntu-zfs " This leaves me in the same situation with "Building only for 3.12.0-rc7+ Module build for the currently running kernel was skipped since the kernel source for this kernel does not seem to be installed." when trying to install ubuntu-zfs. Trying sudo apt-get install --reinstall zfs-dkms also does not work.

    Read the article

  • N-tier Repository POCOs - Aggregates?

    - by Sam
    Assume the following simple POCOs, Country and State: public partial class Country { public Country() { States = new List<State>(); } public virtual int CountryId { get; set; } public virtual string Name { get; set; } public virtual string CountryCode { get; set; } public virtual ICollection<State> States { get; set; } } public partial class State { public virtual int StateId { get; set; } public virtual int CountryId { get; set; } public virtual Country Country { get; set; } public virtual string Name { get; set; } public virtual string Abbreviation { get; set; } } Now assume I have a simple respository that looks something like this: public partial class CountryRepository : IDisposable { protected internal IDatabase _db; public CountryRepository() { _db = new Database(System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["DbConnName"]); } public IEnumerable<Country> GetAll() { return _db.Query<Country>("SELECT * FROM Countries ORDER BY Name", null); } public Country Get(object id) { return _db.SingleById(id); } public void Add(Country c) { _db.Insert(c); } /* ...And So On... */ } Typically in my UI I do not display all of the children (states), but I do display an aggregate count. So my country list view model might look like this: public partial class CountryListVM { [Key] public int CountryId { get; set; } public string Name { get; set; } public string CountryCode { get; set; } public int StateCount { get; set; } } When I'm using the underlying data provider (Entity Framework, NHibernate, PetaPoco, etc) directly in my UI layer, I can easily do something like this: IList<CountryListVM> list = db.Countries .OrderBy(c => c.Name) .Select(c => new CountryListVM() { CountryId = c.CountryId, Name = c.Name, CountryCode = c.CountryCode, StateCount = c.States.Count }) .ToList(); But when I'm using a repository or service pattern, I abstract away direct access to the data layer. It seems as though my options are to: Return the Country with a populated States collection, then map over in the UI layer. The downside to this approach is that I'm returning a lot more data than is actually needed. -or- Put all my view models into my Common dll library (as opposed to having them in the Models directory in my MVC app) and expand my repository to return specific view models instead of just the domain pocos. The downside to this approach is that I'm leaking UI specific stuff (MVC data validation annotations) into my previously clean POCOs. -or- Are there other options? How are you handling these types of things?

    Read the article

  • sudo apt-get update problem

    - by Jeon
    I have a problem with sudo apt-get update that I can't seem to fix and It's causing problems with alot of installations I want to do. I run Ubuntu 12.04. Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise InRelease Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates InRelease Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports InRelease Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security InRelease Get:1 http://repository.spotify.com stable InRelease [2,979 B] Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise InRelease Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com precise InRelease Ign http://archive.canonical.com precise InRelease Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise InRelease Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise InRelease Ign http://repository.spotify.com stable InRelease Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise Release.gpg Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates Release.gpg Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports Release.gpg Ign http://repository.spotify.com stable/non-free amd64 Packages/DiffIndex Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release.gpg Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release.gpg Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise Release.gpg Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise Release.gpg Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security Release.gpg Ign http://repository.spotify.com stable/non-free i386 Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://repository.spotify.com stable/non-free TranslationIndex Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release.gpg Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise Release Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise Release Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise Release Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates Release Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise/partner amd64 Packages Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main Sources Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports Release Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security Release Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise/partner i386 Packages Ign http://archive.canonical.com precise/partner TranslationIndex Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main amd64 Packages Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main i386 Packages Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/main TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/restricted TranslationIndex Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Sources Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main amd64 Packages Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main i386 Packages Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main TranslationIndex Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/universe TranslationIndex Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Sources Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main amd64 Packages Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main i386 Packages Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main TranslationIndex Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Sources Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main amd64 Packages Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main i386 Packages Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/main TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/universe TranslationIndex Hit http://repository.spotify.com stable/non-free amd64 Packages Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/main TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/universe TranslationIndex Hit http://repository.spotify.com stable/non-free i386 Packages Ign http://archive.canonical.com precise/partner Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/main TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/universe TranslationIndex Ign http://repository.spotify.com stable/non-free Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.canonical.com precise/partner Translation-en Ign http://repository.spotify.com stable/non-free Translation-en Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en_US Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/main Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/restricted Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/universe Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/multiverse Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/main amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/restricted amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/universe amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/multiverse amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/main i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/restricted i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/universe i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/multiverse i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/main Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/restricted Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/universe Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/multiverse Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/main amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/restricted amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/universe amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/multiverse amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/main i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/restricted i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/universe i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/multiverse i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/main Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/restricted Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/universe Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/multiverse Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/main amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/restricted amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/universe amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/multiverse amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/main i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/restricted i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/universe i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/multiverse i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/main Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/restricted Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/universe Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/multiverse Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/main amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/restricted amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/universe amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/multiverse amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/main i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/restricted i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/universe i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/multiverse i386 Packages 404 Not Found Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/main Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/multiverse Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/restricted Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/universe Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/main Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/multiverse Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/restricted Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/universe Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/main Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/multiverse Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/restricted Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/universe Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/main Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/multiverse Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/restricted Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/universe Translation-en Fetched 2,979 B in 9s (328 B/s) W: GPG error: http://repository.spotify.com stable InRelease: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 082CCEDF94558F59 W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/restricted/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/universe/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/multiverse/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/restricted/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/universe/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/multiverse/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/restricted/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/universe/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/restricted/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/universe/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/multiverse/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/restricted/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/universe/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/multiverse/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/restricted/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/universe/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/restricted/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/universe/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/multiverse/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/restricted/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/universe/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/multiverse/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/restricted/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/universe/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/restricted/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/universe/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/multiverse/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/restricted/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/universe/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/multiverse/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/restricted/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/universe/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead. I would appreciate a fix to this. Thank you for the help.

    Read the article

  • Best way to cache apt downloads on a LAN?

    - by Ken Simon
    I have multiple Ubuntu machines at home and a pretty slow internet connection, and sometimes multiple machines need to be updated at once (especially during new Ubuntu releases.) Is there a way where only one of my machines needs to download the packages, and the other machines can use the first machine to get the debs? Does it involve setting up my own local mirror? Or a proxy server? Or can it be made simpler?

    Read the article

  • apt-get install does not work. Gives the same error every time E: Unable to locate package

    - by SAMEER
    There is an issue, for every package that I try to install. I am using VMWare Player 3.16 & I have installed Ubuntu 12.04. The error is: E:Unable to locate package (PACKAGE NAME) Also, another problem is that there are some configuration errors. So I have to use the CLI rather than the GUI. Now if this is a network error, I'm not sure as to how to open the setting from the command prompt. Even if I get to the GUI, it might not work, as the shortcuts are not available.

    Read the article

  • How do remove the CD / DVD install as a source for apt-get packages when installing new features?

    - by Andrew
    I'm running a Ubuntu server (9.0.4 'Jaunty') as a VMware image. It's a real pain on the odd occasion I need to install a new package to have to fish out the install CD-ROM, and make it available to the VMware image so I can continue the package install. Is there any way to take the original installation media out of the list of source packages - I'm assuming all packages will be available on the internet. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Best way to cache apt downloads on a LAN?

    - by Ken Simon
    I have multiple Ubuntu machines at home and a pretty slow internet connection, and sometimes multiple machines need to be updated at once (especially during new Ubuntu releases.) Is there a way where only one of my machines needs to download the packages, and the other machines can use the first machine to get the debs? Does it involve setting up my own local mirror? Or a proxy server? Or can it be made simpler?

    Read the article

  • How can I restore a country specific apt-get update mirror?

    - by ferrarimarco
    While configuring my new 13.10 installation, I chose to change the default update server using the "Software & Updates" GUI tool available in the System settings panel. Before this change the selected update server was "Server for Italy" (I live there). Now it's one of the mirrors available in the list of mirrors (one of italian ones). How is "Server for COUNTRY" chosen in the list of mirrors for a country? How can I restore the "Server for Italy" option? Is it advisable to do so? I want to revert that setting because I found that the selected mirror is not up to date (checked from Here).

    Read the article

  • In a DDD approach, is this example modelled correctly?

    - by Tag
    Just created an acc on SO to ask this :) Assuming this simplified example: building a web application to manage projects... The application has the following requirements/rules. 1) Users should be able to create projects inserting the project name. 2) Project names cannot be empty. 3) Two projects can't have the same name. I'm using a 4-layered architecture (User Interface, Application, Domain, Infrastructure). On my Application Layer i have the following ProjectService.cs class: public class ProjectService { private IProjectRepository ProjectRepo { get; set; } public ProjectService(IProjectRepository projectRepo) { ProjectRepo = projectRepo; } public void CreateNewProject(string name) { IList<Project> projects = ProjectRepo.GetProjectsByName(name); if (projects.Count > 0) throw new Exception("Project name already exists."); Project project = new Project(name); ProjectRepo.InsertProject(project); } } On my Domain Layer, i have the Project.cs class and the IProjectRepository.cs interface: public class Project { public int ProjectID { get; private set; } public string Name { get; private set; } public Project(string name) { ValidateName(name); Name = name; } private void ValidateName(string name) { if (name == null || name.Equals(string.Empty)) { throw new Exception("Project name cannot be empty or null."); } } } public interface IProjectRepository { void InsertProject(Project project); IList<Project> GetProjectsByName(string projectName); } On my Infrastructure layer, i have the implementation of IProjectRepository which does the actual querying (the code is irrelevant). I don't like two things about this design: 1) I've read that the repository interfaces should be a part of the domain but the implementations should not. That makes no sense to me since i think the domain shouldn't call the repository methods (persistence ignorance), that should be a responsability of the services in the application layer. (Something tells me i'm terribly wrong.) 2) The process of creating a new project involves two validations (not null and not duplicate). In my design above, those two validations are scattered in two different places making it harder (imho) to see whats going on. So, my question is, from a DDD perspective, is this modelled correctly or would you do it in a different way?

    Read the article

  • Repository Pattern with Entity Framework 3.5 and MVVM

    - by Ravi
    I am developing a Database File System. I am using - .Net framework 3.5 Entity Framework 3.5 WPF with MVVM pattern The project spans across multiple assemblies each using same model. One assembly,let's call it a "server", only adds data to the database using EF i.e. same model.Other assemblies (including the UI) both reads and writes the data.The changes made by server should immediately reflect in other assemblies. The database contains self referencing tables where each entity can have single OR no parent and (may be) some children. I want to use repository pattern which can also provide some mechanism to handle this hierarchical nature. I have already done reading on this on Code Project. It shares the same context(entities) everywhere. My question is - Should I share the same context everywhere? What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing that?

    Read the article

  • EF4, self tracking, repository pattern, SQL Server 2008 AND SQL Server Compact

    - by Darren
    Hi, I am creating a project using Entity Frameworks 4 and self tracking entities. I want to be able to either get the data from a sql server 2008 database or from sql server compact database (with the switch being in the config file). I am using the repository pattern and I will have the self tracking entities sitting in a separate assembly. Do I need two edmx files? If so, how do I generate only one set of STE's in the separate assembly? Also do I need to generate two context classes as well? I am unsure of the plumbing for all this. Can anyone help? Darren I forgot to add that the two databases will be identical and that the compact version is for offline usage.

    Read the article

  • Repository Pattern with Entity Framework 3.5

    - by Ravi
    I am developing a Database File System. I am using - .Net framework 3.5 Entity Framework 3.5 WPF with MVVM pattern The project spans across multiple assemblies each using same model. One assembly,let's call it a "server", only adds data to the database using EF i.e. same model.Other assemblies (including the UI) both reads and writes the data.The changes made by server should immediately reflect in other assemblies. The database contains self referencing tables where each entity can have single OR no parent and (may be) some children. I want to use repository pattern which can also provide some mechanism to handle this hierarchical nature. I have already done reading on this on Code Project. It shares the same context(entities) everywhere. My question is - Should I share the same context everywhere? What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing that?

    Read the article

  • Repository Pattern with Entity Framework 3.5

    - by Ravi
    I am developing a Database File System. I am using - .Net framework 3.5 Entity Framework 3.5 WPF with MVVM pattern The project spans across multiple assemblies each using same model. One assembly,let's call it a "server", only adds data to the database using EF i.e. same model.Other assemblies (including the UI) both reads and writes the data.The changes made by server should immediately reflect in other assemblies. The database contains self referencing tables where each entity can have single OR no parent and (may be) some children. I want to use repository pattern which can also provide some mechanism to handle this hierarchical nature. I have already done reading on this on Code Project. It shares the same context(entities) everywhere. My question is - Should I share the same context everywhere? What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing that?

    Read the article

  • NHibernate with or without Repository

    - by Groo
    There are several similar questions on this matter, by I still haven't found enough reasons to decide which way to go. The real question is, is it reasonable to abstract the NHibernate using a Repository pattern, or not? It seems that the only reason behind abstracting it is to leave yourself an option to replace NHibernate with a different ORM if needed. But creating repositories and abstracting queries seems like adding yet another layer, and doing much of the plumbing by hand. One option is to use expose IQueryable<T> to the business layer and use LINQ, but from my experience LINQ support is still not fully implemented in NHibernate (queries simply don't always work as expected, and I hate spending time on debugging a framework). Although referencing NHibernate in my business layer hurts my eyes, it is supposed to be an abstraction of data access by itself, right? What are you opinions on this?

    Read the article

  • Proper way to build a data Repository in ASP.NET MVC

    - by rockinthesixstring
    I'm working on using the Repository methodology in my App and I have a very fundamental question. When I build my Model, I have a Data.dbml file and then I'm putting my Repositories in the same folder with it.... IE: Data.dbml IUserRepository.cs UserRepository.cs My question is simple. Is it better to build the folder structure like that above, or is it ok to simply put my Interface in with the UserRepository.cs? Data.dbml UserRepository.cs              which contains both the interface and the class Just looking for "best practices" here. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25  | Next Page >