Search Results

Search found 113649 results on 4546 pages for 'how to get web site thumbnail image in asp net'.

Page 182/4546 | < Previous Page | 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189  | Next Page >

  • How to get the Time Difference in C# .net

    - by Aamir Hasan
    A DateTime instance stores both date and time information. The DateTime class can be found in the System namespace.In order to retrieve the current system time, we can use the static property Now of the DateTime class.In this Example i have shown, how to calculate the difference between two DateTime objects using C# syntax. DateTime startTime; DateTime endTime;            startTime = Convert.ToDateTime("12:12 AM");            endTime = Convert.ToDateTime("1:12 AM");            var timeDifference = new TimeSpan(endTime.Ticks - startTime.Ticks);Response.Write("Time difference in hours is " + timeDifference.Hours);Link:http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/8kb3ddd4.aspx

    Read the article

  • How do I create a background image on web page?

    - by kasha
    I am a new designer so hopefully this question isn't too basic! How do I create a background image on a webpage for a programmer? I designed the page in photoshop and I would like to know how to send the background image (the 25% opacity buildings overlay). I would be happy to send the main image (but it is too large and I imagine would slow the site and loading time drastically). here is the link to the design... http://problemio.com/home_page_1_1.pdf

    Read the article

  • Google analytics shows wrong number of page views, asp.net website

    - by f_karlsson
    Sometimes it can be for example 4500 requests, after a few hours it shows a few thousand less. What is wrong? It looks like analytics corrects itself. I changed from classic to Universal a few months ago, do not know if it has anything to do with this. In masterpage: <script> (function (i, s, o, g, r, a, m) { i['GoogleAnalyticsObject'] = r; i[r] = i[r] || function () { (i[r].q = i[r].q || []).push(arguments) }, i[r].l = 1 * new Date(); a = s.createElement(o), m = s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0]; a.async = 1; a.src = g; m.parentNode.insertBefore(a, m) })(window, document, 'script', '//www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js', 'ga'); ga('create', 'UA-xxxxxxxx-1', 'xxxxx.se'); ga('send', 'pageview'); </script>

    Read the article

  • Ruby gem installation error after OSX Yosemite and Xcode 6 installation

    - by Andres Trevino
    I tried installing a gem like I did before installing Yosemite, but now I'm getting an error: /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/ext/builder.rb:159:in `synchronize': ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension. (Gem::Ext::BuildError) ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension. deadlock; recursive locking This is the command I wrote: sudo gem install mysql2 This is the message it appears in the terminal: Gem files will remain installed in /Library/Ruby/Gems/2.0.0/gems/autotest-fsevent-0.2.9 for inspection. Results logged to /Library/Ruby/Gems/2.0.0/extensions/universal-darwin-14/2.0.0/autotest-fsevent-0.2.9/gem_make.out Gem files will remain installed in /Library/Ruby/Gems/2.0.0/gems/autotest-fsevent-0.2.9 for inspection. Results logged to /Library/Ruby/Gems/2.0.0/extensions/universal-darwin-14/2.0.0/autotest-fsevent-0.2.9/gem_make.out from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/ext/builder.rb:159:in build_extension' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/ext/builder.rb:198:inblock in build_extensions' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/ext/builder.rb:195:in each' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/ext/builder.rb:195:inbuild_extensions' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1436:in block in build_extensions' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/user_interaction.rb:45:inuse_ui' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1434:in build_extensions' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/stub_specification.rb:60:inbuild_extensions' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/basic_specification.rb:56:in contains_requirable_file?' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/specification.rb:925:inblock in find_inactive_by_path' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/specification.rb:924:in each' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/specification.rb:924:infind' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/specification.rb:924:in find_inactive_by_path' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems.rb:185:intry_activate' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:132:in rescue in require' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:144:inrequire' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems.rb:601:in load_yaml' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/config_file.rb:328:inload_file' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/config_file.rb:197:in initialize' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems.rb:289:innew' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems.rb:289:in configuration' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/ext/builder.rb:63:inrun' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/ext/ext_conf_builder.rb:38:in block in build' from /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/2.0/usr/lib/ruby/2.0.0/tempfile.rb:324:inopen' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/ext/ext_conf_builder.rb:17:in build' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/ext/builder.rb:161:inblock (2 levels) in build_extension' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/ext/builder.rb:160:in chdir' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/ext/builder.rb:160:inblock in build_extension' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/ext/builder.rb:159:in synchronize' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/ext/builder.rb:159:inbuild_extension' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/ext/builder.rb:198:in block in build_extensions' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/ext/builder.rb:195:ineach' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/ext/builder.rb:195:in build_extensions' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1436:inblock in build_extensions' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/user_interaction.rb:45:in use_ui' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1434:inbuild_extensions' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/stub_specification.rb:60:in build_extensions' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/basic_specification.rb:56:incontains_requirable_file?' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/specification.rb:925:in block in find_inactive_by_path' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/specification.rb:924:ineach' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/specification.rb:924:in find' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/specification.rb:924:infind_inactive_by_path' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems.rb:185:in try_activate' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:132:inrescue in require' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:144:in require' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems.rb:601:inload_yaml' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/config_file.rb:328:in load_file' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/config_file.rb:197:ininitialize' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/gem_runner.rb:74:in new' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/gem_runner.rb:74:indo_configuration' from /Library/Ruby/Site/2.0.0/rubygems/gem_runner.rb:39:in run' from /usr/bin/gem:21:in' I am using OSX 10.10 and Xcode 6 Beta. Do any of you guys have any idea as to what to do about this? Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Does ASP.NET need to be configured for Full Trust to implement 'PageHandlerFactory' ?

    - by Kev
    Our hosting platform (running IIS6/ASP.NET 2.0) is configured to run under partial trust. In the machine wide web.config file we set the ASP.NET trust level to Medium (and lock to prevent overrides) and use a modified policy file. When trying to add a custom HttpHandler to handle .aspx requests for a website running in this configuration I get the following security exception: Security Exception Description: The application attempted to perform an operation not allowed by the security policy. To grant this application the required permission please contact your system administrator or change the application's trust level in the configuration file. Exception Details: System.Security.SecurityException: Request failed. Source Error: An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below. Stack Trace: [SecurityException: Request failed.] System.Reflection.Assembly._GetType(String name, Boolean throwOnError, Boolean ignoreCase) +0 System.Reflection.Assembly.GetType(String name, Boolean throwOnError, Boolean ignoreCase) +42 System.Web.Compilation.CompilationUtil.GetTypeFromAssemblies(AssemblyCollection assembliesCollection, String typeName, Boolean ignoreCase) +172 System.Web.Compilation.BuildManager.GetType(String typeName, Boolean throwOnError, Boolean ignoreCase) +291 System.Web.Configuration.ConfigUtil.GetType(String typeName, String propertyName, ConfigurationElement configElement, XmlNode node, Boolean checkAptcaBit, Boolean ignoreCase) +52 I'm using a class derived from PageHandlerFactory, for example: public class MyPageHandlerFactory : PageHandlerFactory { public override System.Web.IHttpHandler GetHandler(System.Web.HttpContext context, string requestType, string virtualPath, string path) { // CustomPageHandler derives from System.Web.UI.Page return new CustomPageHandler(); } } My web.config httpHandler configuration is as follow: <httpHandlers> <add verb="*" path="*.aspx" type="MyPageHandler.MyPageHandlerFactory" /> </httpHandlers> The documentation for PageHandlerFactory shows that PageHandlerFactory is decorated with the following attributes: [PermissionSetAttribute(SecurityAction.LinkDemand, Unrestricted = true)] [PermissionSetAttribute(SecurityAction.InheritanceDemand, Unrestricted = true)] public class PageHandlerFactory : IHttpHandlerFactory Does this mean that I need to set ASP.NET to run at Full Trust to be able to create my own PageHandlerFactory classes?

    Read the article

  • What happened to the .NET version definition with v4.0?

    - by Tom Tresansky
    I'm building a C# class library, and using the beta 2 of Visual Web Developer/Visual C# 2010. I'm trying to save information about what version of .NET the library was built under. In the past, I was able to use this: // What version of .net was it built under? #if NET_1_0 public const string NETFrameworkVersion = ".NET 1.0"; #elif NET_1_1 public const string NETFrameworkVersion = ".NET 1.1"; #elif NET_2_0 public const string NETFrameworkVersion = ".NET 2.0"; #elif NET_3_5 public const string NETFrameworkVersion = ".NET 3.5"; #else public const string NETFrameworkVersion = ".NET version unknown"; #endif So I figured I could just add: #elif NET_4_0 public const string NETFrameworkVersion = ".NET 4.0"; Now, in Project-Properties, my target Framework is ".NET Framework 4". If I check: Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly().ImageRuntimeVersion I can see my runtime version is v4.0.21006 (so I know I have .NET 4.0 installed on my CPU). I naturally expect to see that my NETFrameworkVersion variable holds ".NET 4.0". It does not. It holds ".NET version unknown". So my question is, why is NET_4_0 not defined? Did the naming convention change? Is there some simple other way to determine .NET framework build version in versions 3.5?

    Read the article

  • Where to find documentation/tutorials on ASP.NET MVC2?

    - by Richard77
    Hello, It looks like the final release for ASP.NET MVC 2 has been already around for 2 weeks. Unfortunately, I can't find documentation that's intended for MVC 2 exclusively. I've checked Amazon.com (no book yet on MVC2), ScottGu's Blog (only 2 short posts), ASP.NET/MVC website (they've only posted what are alreadi in the ScottGu's blog). Any idea where to find matter on MVC2? Thanks for helping.

    Read the article

  • How to retrieve video thumbnail from an absolute path?

    - by steff
    Hi everyone, I know this has to be trivial but I just don't find the right resource, I guess. So all I want to do is retrieving a thumbnail for a video. All I have is the absolute path to the file on the sdcard as a String. So please point me into the right direction. And believe me, this is embarrassing enough to ask... Regards, Steff

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC2: Can you get ModelMetadata.ContainerType from within a collection?

    - by CodeSponge
    I'm trying to call DisplayFor and DisplayForModel to iterate an IEnumerable< with various element types from within a view. I have Templates defined for each element/Model type. What I would like to do is check the ViewData.ModelMetadata.ContainerType from within the Template so that Template can determine if it was called as part of a collection. A simple example: Index1.aspx: To render a collection of Foos. <%@ Page Language="C#" MasterPageFile="~/Views/Shared/Site.Master" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewPage<IEnumerable<Foo>>" %> <asp:Content ContentPlaceHolderID="MainPlaceHolder" runat="server"> <ul><%:Html.DisplayForModel()%></ul> </asp:Content> Index2.aspx: To render a Foo. <%@ Page Language="C#" MasterPageFile="~/Views/Shared/Site.Master" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewPage<Foo>" %> <asp:Content ContentPlaceHolderID="MainPlaceHolder" runat="server"> <%:Html.DisplayForModel()%> </asp:Content> Shared\DisplayTemplates\Foo.ascx: A context aware Template for Foo. <%@ Control Language="C#" Inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewUserControl<Foo>" %> <% var tag = typeof(IEnumerable).IsAssignableFrom(ViewData.ModelMetaData.ContainerType) ? "li" : "div"; %> <<%:tag%>><%:Model.Name%></<%:tag%>> The problem with this example is that ViewData.ModelMetaData.ContainerType is null in the Template when resolved though Index1.aspx. From what I've read on Brad Wilson post and others it has to do with the use of IEnumerable and its being an interface. Is there a way to insure that the ContainerType is set? Perhaps by creating a ModelMetadataProviders? I looked into that breifly but it appears the ContainerType value is determined before and then passed to the Provider. Any suggestions would be appreciated.

    Read the article

  • What is the best way to work on a MVC project online?

    - by Alon
    In a regular Web Forms application, I could upload the files to a web server and just open the web server in Visual Web Developer and it worked great, but because MVC is a project and not a web application, I can't just upload the files regulary and still open it in Visual Web Developre normally... So here comes the SVN, but the problem is that I can't show the web site before publish to my boss... Any solutions?

    Read the article

  • Can ASP.NET MVC html helpers render an element without an ID attribute?

    - by thekaido
    Assume I want to generate an element similar to this in ASP.NET MVC 2: <%= Html.TextBoxFor(p => p.FooBar)%> Is there an overload or way I can get ASP.NET MVC 2 to only generate a name attribute and not an ID attribute? I can have it generate a blank id with <%= Html.TextBoxFor(p => p.FooBar)%>, new { id = "" }, but I would like to generate the element with no ID at all.

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC users - do you miss anything from WebForms?

    - by Richard Ev
    There are lots of articles and discussions about the differences between ASP.NET WebForms and ASP.NET MVC that compare the relative merits of the two frameworks. I have a different question for anyone who has experience using WebForms that has since moved to MVC: What is the number one thing that WebForms had, that MVC doesn't, that you really miss? Edit No-one has mentioned the WebForms validation controls. I am now working on some code that has a few dependant validation rules and implementing client-side validation for these is proving slow.

    Read the article

  • how to apply the center of image view for another image view center

    - by maddy
    hi, I am developing image redraw app. i know the center of one image view which is having scaling property. i.e it can change it frame and center . that to be applied to another view center. when i apply center to newly formed Image view it giving wrong center because of the previous image view is having scaling property. so how can i get exact center to my new image view from previous imageview

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET AJAX Doesnt Work

    - by Petras
    I have a very simple AJAX example that doesn't work. It is from the Microsoft tutorials on AJAX. When I click on button "Button1" AJAX should execute but the whole page submits. Here is the code: <%@ Page Language="C#" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeFile="1111.aspx.cs" Inherits="_1111" %> <%@ Register Assembly="System.Web.Extensions, Version=3.5.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35" Namespace="System.Web.UI" TagPrefix="asp" %> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head runat="server"> <title></title> </head> <body> <form id="form1" runat="server"> <p> DropDownList AutoPostBack SelectedIndexChanged EventArgs Sort ... Since you will be using AJAX to process your SelectedIndexChanged event, set the AutoPostBack property of the DropDownList to false. ...</p> <div> <asp:ScriptManager ID="ScriptManager1" runat="server" EnablePartialRendering="true"> </asp:ScriptManager> <asp:Label ID="label2" runat="server"></asp:Label><br /> <asp:Label ID="label3" runat="server"></asp:Label><br /> <center> <asp:UpdatePanel ID="UpdatePanel1" runat="server"> <ContentTemplate> <asp:Label ID="label1" runat="server"></asp:Label> <asp:Button ID="Button1" runat="server" OnClick="Button1_Click" Text="Button 1" /> </ContentTemplate> <Triggers> <asp:AsyncPostBackTrigger ControlID="Button1" EventName="Click" /> </Triggers> </asp:UpdatePanel></center> </div> </form> </body> </html> using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Web; using System.Web.UI; using System.Web.UI.WebControls; public partial class _1111 : System.Web.UI.Page { protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { label1.Text = System.DateTime.Now.ToString(); label2.Text = System.DateTime.Now.ToString(); label3.Text = System.DateTime.Now.ToString(); } protected void Button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { label1.Text = System.DateTime.Now.ToString(); } }

    Read the article

  • What's the best method in ASP.NET to obtain the current domain?

    - by Graphain
    Hi, I am wondering what the best way to obtain the current domain is in ASP.NET? For instance: http://www.domainname.com/subdir/ should yield http://www.domainname.com http://www.sub.domainname.com/subdir/ should yield http://sub.domainname.com As a guide, I should be able to add a url like "/Folder/Content/filename.html" (say as generated by Url.RouteUrl() in ASP.NET MVC) straight onto the URL and it should work.

    Read the article

  • Beginner to asp.net.. What should i choose webforms or mvc?

    - by MuraliVijay CSK
    I am new to web development and asp.net... I was going through asp.net website and 'n' number of question here in stackoverflow regarding Webforms or MVC.... But still as a beginner can't get an idea what to choose? What should i choose webforms or mvc? If MVC,What should i know before getting started with it? If webforms,What should i know before getting started with it?

    Read the article

  • How to bind grid in ASP.NET?

    - by Abid Ali
    I cant bind my Grid. I dont know what I am doing wrong, the grid appears empty when I run the program. here is my code :: protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { if (!IsPostBack) this.BindGrid(this.GridView1); } private void BindGrid(GridView grid) { SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand("Select * from Person", cn); SqlDataAdapter da = new SqlDataAdapter(cmd); DataTable dt = new DataTable(); da.Fill(dt); grid.DataSource = dt; grid.DataBind(); } <body> <form id="form1" runat="server"> <div style="margin-left: 240px"> <asp:GridView ID="GridView1" runat="server" CellPadding="4" ForeColor="#333333" GridLines="None" Width="856px" AutoGenerateColumns = "false" ShowFooter = "true" ShowHeader="true" BorderStyle="Groove" CaptionAlign="Top" HorizontalAlign="Center" onrowdatabound="GridView1_RowDataBound" > <RowStyle BackColor="#F7F6F3" ForeColor="#333333" /> <Columns> <asp:BoundField HeaderText="ID" /> <asp:BoundField HeaderText="First Name" /> <asp:BoundField HeaderText="Last Name" /> <asp:BoundField HeaderText="Home Phone #" /> <asp:BoundField HeaderText="Cell #" /> <asp:BoundField HeaderText="Email Address" /> <asp:BoundField HeaderText="NIC #" /> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="Action"> <ItemTemplate> <asp:Button ID="Button1" runat="server" Text="Button" /> <asp:Button ID="Button2" runat="server" Text="Button" /> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> </Columns> <FooterStyle BackColor="#5D7B9D" Font-Bold="True" ForeColor="White" /> <PagerStyle BackColor="#284775" ForeColor="White" HorizontalAlign="Center" /> <SelectedRowStyle BackColor="#E2DED6" Font-Bold="True" ForeColor="#333333" /> <HeaderStyle BackColor="#5D7B9D" Font-Bold="True" ForeColor="White" /> <EditRowStyle BackColor="#999999" /> <AlternatingRowStyle BackColor="White" ForeColor="#284775" /> </asp:GridView> </div> </form> </body>

    Read the article

  • How can I implement ASP.NET MVC without using Visual Studio?

    - by Cheeso
    I have seen ASP.NET MVC Without Visual Studio, which asks, Is it possible to produce a website based on ASP.NET MVC, without using Visual Studio? And the accepted answer is, yes. Ok, next question: how? Here's an analogy. If I want to create an ASP.NET Webforms page, I load up my favorite text editor, create a file named Something.aspx. Then I insert into that file, some boilerplate: <%@ Page Language="C#" Debug="true" Trace="false" Src="Sourcefile.cs" Inherits="My.Namespace.ContentsPage" %> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> <head> <title>Title goes here </title> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="css/style.css"></link> <style type="text/css"> #elementid { font-size: 9pt; color: Navy; ... more css ... } </style> <script type="text/javascript" language='javascript'> // insert javascript here. </script> </head> <body> <asp:Literal Id='Holder' runat='server'/> <br/> <div id='msgs'></div> </body> </html> Then I also create the Sourcefile.cs file: namespace My.Namespace { using System; using System.Web; using System.Xml; // etc... public class ContentsPage : System.Web.UI.Page { protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.Literal Holder; void Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) { // page load logic here } } } And that is a working ASPNET page, created in a text editor. Drop it into an IIS virtual directory, and it's working. What do I have to do, to make a basic, hello, World ASPNET MVC app, in a text editor? (without Visual Studio)

    Read the article

  • How late it is to not migrate to .Net 3.5 from .Net 2.0 ?

    - by this. __curious_geek
    We have some applications that are being worked upon in .Net 2.0 since long back. I'm recommending my team to move the base from .net 2.0 to .net 3.5sp1 and focus and leverage from C# 3.0 but I'm facing difficulties in doing so. What are the implications of not migrating to .net 3.5 and C# 3.0 ? What are your experiences on this front and what tactics did you use to successfully migrate your team and projects to .net3.5.

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC 4/Web API Single Page App for Mobile Devices ... Needs Authentication

    - by lmttag
    We have developed an ASP.NET MVC 4/Web API single page, mobile website (also using jQuery Mobile) that is intended to be accessed only from mobile devices (e.g., iPads, iPhones, Android tables and phones, etc.), not desktop browsers. This mobile website will be hosted internally, like an intranet site. However, since we’re accessing it from mobile devices, we can’t use Windows authentication. We still need to know which user (and their role) is logging in to the mobile website app. We tried simply using ASP.NET’s forms authentication and membership provider, but couldn’t get it working exactly the way we wanted. What we need is for the user to be prompted for a user name and password only on the first time they access the site on their mobile device. After they enter a correct user name and password and have been authenticated once, each subsequent time they access the site they should just go right in. They shouldn’t have to re-enter their credentials (i.e., something needs to be saved locally to each device to identify the user after the first time). This is where we had troubles. Everything worked as expected the first time. That is, the user was prompted to enter a user name and password, and, after doing that, was authenticated and allowed into the site. The problem is every time after the browser was closed on the mobile device, the device and user were not know and the user had to re-enter user name and password. We tried lots of things too. We tried setting persistent cookies in JavaScript. No good. The cookies weren’t there to be read the second time. We tried manually setting persistent cookies from ASP.NET. No good. We, of course, used FormsAuthentication.SetAuthCookie(model.UserName, true); as part of the form authentication framework. No good. We tried using HTML5 local storage. No good. No matter what we tried, if the user was on a mobile device, they would have to log in every single time. (Note: we’ve tried on an iPad and iPhone running both iOS 5.1 and 6.0, with Safari configure to allow cookies, and we’ve tried on Android 2.3.4.) Is there some trick to getting a scenario like this working? Or, do we have to write some sort of custom authentication mechanism? If so, how? And, what? Or, should we use something like claims-based authentication and WIF? Or??? Any help is appreciated. Thanks!

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189  | Next Page >