Search Results

Search found 1523 results on 61 pages for 'assignment'.

Page 2/61 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

• Shortcut "or-assignment" (|=) operator in Java

  - by Dr. Monkey

  I have a long set of comparisons to do in Java, and I'd like to know if one or more of them come out as true. The string of comparisons was long and difficult to read, so I broke it up for readability, and automatically went to use a shortcut operator |= rather than negativeValue = negativeValue || boolean. boolean negativeValue = false; negativeValue |= (defaultStock < 0); negativeValue |= (defaultWholesale < 0); negativeValue |= (defaultRetail < 0); negativeValue |= (defaultDelivery < 0); I expect negativeValue to be true if any of the default<something> values are negative. Is this valid? Will it do what I expect? I couldn't see it mentioned on Sun's site or stackoverflow, but Eclipse doesn't seem to have a problem with it and the code compiles and runs.

  Read the article

• memcpy vs assignment in C

  - by SetJmp

  Under what circumstances should I expect memcpys to outperform assignments on modern INTEL/AMD hardware? I am using GCC 4.2.x on a 32 bit Intel platform (but am interested in 64 bit as well).

  Read the article

• Variable Assignment and loops (Java)

  - by Raven Dreamer

  Greetings Stack Overflowers, A while back, I was working on a program that hashed values into a hashtable (I don't remember the specifics, and the specifics themselves are irrelevant to the question at hand). Anyway, I had the following code as part of a "recordInput" method. tempElement = new hashElement(someInt); while(in.hasNext() == true) { int firstVal = in.nextInt(); if (firstVal == -911) { break; } tempElement.setKeyValue(firstVal, 0); for(int i = 1; i<numKeyValues;i++) { tempElement.setKeyValue(in.nextInt(), i); } elementArray[placeValue] = tempElement; placeValue++; } // close while loop } // close method This part of the code was giving me a very nasty bug -- no matter how I finagled it, no matter what input I gave the program, it would always produce an array full of only a single value -- the last one. The problem, as I later determined it, was that because I had not created the tempElement variable within the loop, and because values were not being assigned to elementArray[] until after the loop had ended -- every term was defined rather as "tempElement" -- when the loop terminated, every slot in the array was filled with the last value tempElement had taken. I was able to fix this bug by moving the declaration of tempElement within the while loop. My question to you, Stackoverflow, is whether there is another (read: better) way to avoid this bug while keeping the variable declaration of tempElement outside the while loop. (suggestions for better title and tags also appreciated)

  Read the article

• Auto-(un)boxing fail for compound assignment

  - by polygenelubricants

  Thanks to the implicit casting in compound assignments and increment/decrement operators, the following compiles: byte b = 0; ++b; b++; --b; b--; b += b -= b *= b /= b %= b; b <<= b >>= b >>>= b; b |= b &= b ^= b; And thanks to auto-boxing and auto-unboxing, the following also compiles: Integer ii = 0; ++ii; ii++; --ii; ii--; ii += ii -= ii *= ii /= ii %= ii; ii <<= ii >>= ii >>>= ii; ii |= ii &= ii ^= ii; And yet, the last line in the following snippet gives compile-time error: Byte bb = 0; ++bb; bb++; --bb; bb--; // ... okay so far! bb += bb; // DOESN'T COMPILE!!! // "The operator += is undefined for the argument type(s) Byte, byte" Can anyone help me figure out what's going on here? The byte b version compiles just fine, so shouldn't Byte bb just follow suit and do the appropriate boxing and unboxing as necessary to accommodate?

  Read the article

• Java assignment issues - Is this atomic?

  - by Bob

  Hi, I've got some questions about Java's assigment. Strings I've got a class: public class Test { private String s; public synchronized void setS(String str){ s = s + " - " + str; } public String getS(){ return s; } } I'm using "synchronized" in my setter, and avoiding it in my getter, because in my app, there are a tons of data gettings, and very few settings. Settings must be synchronized to avoid inconsistency. My question is: is getting and setting a variable atomic? I mean, in a multithreaded environment, Thread1 is about to set variable s, while Thread2 is about to get "s". Is there any way the getter method could get something different than the s's old value or the s's new value (suppose we've got only two threads)? In my app it is not a problem to get the new value, and it is not a problem to get the old one. But could I get something else? What about HashMap's getting and putting? considering this: public class Test { private Map<Integer, String> map = Collections.synchronizedMap(new HashMap<Integer, String>()); public synchronized void setMapElement(Integer key, String value){ map.put(key, value); } public String getValue(Integer key){ return map.get(key); } } Is putting and getting atomic? How does HashMap handle putting an element into it? Does it first remove the old value and put the now one? Could I get other than the old value or the new value? Thanks in advance!

  Read the article

• Java array assignment (multiple values)

  - by Danny King

  Hello, I have a Java array defined already e.g. float[] values = new float[3]; I would like to do something like this further on in the code: values = {0.1f, 0.2f, 0.3f}; But that gives me a compile error. Is there a nicer way to define multiple values at once, rather than doing this?: values[0] = 0.1f; values[1] = 0.2f; values[2] = 0.3f; Thanks!

  Read the article

• How do I do multiple assignment in MATLAB?

  - by Benjamin Oakes

  Here's an example of what I'm looking for: >> foo = [88, 12]; >> [x, y] = foo; I'd expect something like this afterwards: >> x x = 88 >> y y = 12 But instead I get errors like: ??? Too many output arguments. I thought deal() might do it, but it seems to only work on cells. >> [x, y] = deal(foo{:}); ??? Cell contents reference from a non-cell array object. How do I solve my problem? Must I constantly index by 1 and 2 if I want to deal with them separately?

  Read the article

• Bizzare Java invalid Assignment Operator Error

  - by Kay

  public class MaxHeap<T extends Comparable<T>> implements Heap<T>{ private T[] heap; private int lastIndex; private static final int defaultInitialCapacity = 25; public void add(T newItem) throws HeapException{ if (lastIndex < Max_Heap){ heap[lastIndex] = newItem; int place = lastIndex; int parent = (place – 1)/2; //ERROR HERE********** while ( (parent >=0) && (heap[place].compareTo(heap[parent])>0)){ T temp = heap[place]; heap[place] = heap[parent]; heap[parent] = temp; place = parent; parent = (place-1)/2; }else { throw new HeapException(“HeapException: Heap full”); } } } Eclipse complains that there is a: "Syntax error on token "Invalid Character", invalid AssignmentOperator" With the red line beneath the '(place-1)' There shouldn't be an error at all since it's just straight-forward arithmetic. Or is it not that simple?

  Read the article

• C++ assignment - stylish or performance?

  - by joejax

  Having been writing Java code for many years, I was amazed when I see this C++ statement: int a,b; int c = (a=1, b=a+2, b*3); My question is: Is this a choice of coding style, or it has real benefit? (looking for a practicle use case) I think the compiler will see it the same as following: int a=1, b=a+2; int c = b*3; (What's the offical name for this? I assume it's a standard C/C++ syntax.)

  Read the article

• C * operator meaning in array assignment

  - by bigben

  What does this line mean? I havn't done C in a few years. Does it perform the operation in parens then make the int result a pointer?? b[0] = *(start + pos++);

  Read the article

• Java: Object Array assignment in for loop

  - by Hackster

  I am trying to use Dijkstra's algorithm to find the shortest path from a specific vertex (v0) to the rest of them. That is solved and works well with this code from this link below: http://en.literateprograms.org/index.php?title=Special:DownloadCode/Dijkstra%27s_algorithm_(Java)&oldid=15444 I am having trouble with assigning the Edge array in a for loop from the user input, as opposed to hard-coding it like it is here. Any help assigning a new edge to Edge[] adjacencies from each vertex? Keeping in mind it could be 1 or multiple edges. class Vertex implements Comparable<Vertex> { public final String name; public Edge[] adjacencies; public double minDistance = Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY; public Vertex previous; public Vertex(String argName) { name = argName; } public String toString() { return name; } public int compareTo(Vertex other){ return Double.compare(minDistance, other.minDistance); } } class Edge{ public final Vertex target; public final double weight; public Edge(Vertex argTarget, double argWeight){ target = argTarget; weight = argWeight; } } public static void main(String[] args) { Vertex v[] = new Vertex[3]; Vertex v[0] = new Vertex("Harrisburg"); Vertex v[1] = new Vertex("Baltimore"); Vertex v[2] = new Vertex("Washington"); v0.adjacencies = new Edge[]{ new Edge(v[1], 1), new Edge(v[2], 3) }; v1.adjacencies = new Edge[]{ new Edge(v[0], 1), new Edge(v[2], 1),}; v2.adjacencies = new Edge[]{ new Edge(v[0], 3), new Edge(v[1], 1) }; Vertex[] vertices = { v0, v1, v2}; /*Three vertices with weight: V0 connects (V1,1),(V2,3) V1 connects (V0,1),(V2,1) V2 connects (V1,1),(V2,3) */ computePaths(v0); for (Vertex v : vertices){ System.out.println("Distance to " + v + ": " + v.minDistance); List<Vertex> path = getShortestPathTo(v); System.out.println("Path: " + path); } } } The above code works well in finding the shortest path from v0 to all the other vertices. The problem occurs when assigning the new edge[] to edge[] adjacencies. For example this does not produce the correct output: for (int i = 0; i < total_vertices; i++){ s = br.readLine(); char[] line = s.toCharArray(); for (int j = 0; j < line.length; j++){ if(j % 4 == 0 ){ //Input: vertex weight vertex weight: 1 1 2 3 int vert = Integer.parseInt(String.valueOf(line[j])); int w = Integer.parseInt(String.valueOf(line[j+2])); v[i].adjacencies = new Edge[] {new Edge(v[vert], w)}; } } } As opposed to this: v0.adjacencies = new Edge[]{ new Edge(v[1], 1), new Edge(v[2], 3) }; How can I take the user input and make an Edge[], to pass it to adjacencies? The problem is it could be 0 edges or many. Any help would be much appreciated Thanks!

  Read the article

• BPM 11g - Dynamic Task Assignment with Multi-level Organization Units

  - by Mark Foster

  I've seen several requirements to have a more granular level of task assignment in BPM 11g based on some value in the data passed to the process. Parametric Roles is normally the first port of call to try to satisfy this requirement, but in this blog we will show how a lot of use-cases can be satisfied by the easier to implement and flexible Organization Unit. The Use-Case Task assignment is to an approval group containing several users. At runtime, a location value in the input data determines which of the particular users the task is ultimately assigned to. In this case we use the Demo Community referenced in the SOA Admin Guide, and specifically the "LoanAnalyticGroup" which contains three users; "szweig", "mmitch" & "fkafka". In our scenario we would like to assign a task to "szweig" if the input data specifies that the location is "JapanCentral", to "fkafka" if the location is "JapanNorth" and to "mmitch" if "JapanSouth", and to all of them if the location is "Japan" i.e....   The Process Simple one human task process.... In the output data association of the "Start" activity we need to set the value of the "Organization Unit" predefined variable based on the input data (note that the  predefined variables can only be set on output data associations)....  ...and in the output data association of the human activity we will reset the "Organization Unit" to empty, always good practice to ensure that the Organization Unit will not be used for any subsequent human activities for which we do not require it.... Set Up the Organization Unit  Log in to the BPM Workspace with an administrator user (weblogic/welcome1 in our case) and choose the "Administration" option. Within "Roles" assign the "ProcessOwner" swim-lane for our process to "LoanAnalyticGroup".... Within "Organization Units" we can model our organization.... "Root Organization Unit" as "Japan" and "Child Organization Unit" as "Central", "South" & "North" as shown. As described previously, add user "szweig" to "Central", "mmitch" to "South" and "fkafka" to "North"....   Test the Process Invalid Data  First let us test with invalid data in the input to see what the consequences are, here we use "X" as input.... ...and looking at the instance we can see it has errored.... Organization Unit Root Level Assignment  Now let us see what happens if we have "Japan" in the input data.... ...looking in the "flow trace" we can see that the task has been assigned....  ... but who has the task been assigned to ? Let us look in the BPM Workspace for user "szweig"....  ...and for "mmitch"....  ... and for "fkafka"....  ...so we can see that with an Organization Unit at "Root" level we have successfully assigned the task to all users. Organization Unit Child Level Assignment  Now let us test with "Japan/North" in the input data.... ...and looking in "fkafka" workspace we see the task has been assigned, remember, he was associated with "JapanNorth"....   ... but what about the workspace of "szweig"....  ...no tasks assigned, neither has "mmitch", just as we expected. Summary  We have seen in this blog how to easily implement multi-level dynamic task routing using Organization Units, a common use-case and a simpler solution than Parametric Roles. 

  Read the article

• Variable declaration versus assignment syntax

  - by rwallace

  Working on a statically typed language with type inference and streamlined syntax, and need to make final decision about syntax for variable declaration versus assignment. Specifically I'm trying to choose between: // Option 1. Create new local variable with :=, assign with = foo := 1 foo = 2 // Option 2. Create new local variable with =, assign with := foo = 1 foo := 2 Creating functions will use = regardless: // Indentation delimits blocks square x = x * x And assignment to compound objects will do likewise: sky.color = blue a[i] = 0 Which of options 1 or 2 would people find most convenient/least surprising/otherwise best?

  Read the article

• What's the difference between explicit and implicit assignment in C++

  - by Jake Petroules

  int value = 5; // this type of assignment is called an explicit assignment int value(5); // this type of assignment is called an implicit assignment What is the difference between those, if any, and in what cases do explicit and implicit assignment differ and how?

  Read the article

• [C++] Can all/any struct assignment operator be Overloaded? (and specifically struct tm = sql::Resu

  - by Luke Mcneice

  Hi all, Generally, i was wondering if there was any exceptions of types that cant have thier assignment operator overloaded. Specifically, I'm wanting to overload the assignment operator of a tm struct, (time.h) so i can assign a sql::ResultSet to it. I have already have the conversion logic: sscanf(sqlresult->getString("StoredAt").c_str(),"%d-%d-%d %d:%d:%d",&TempTimeStruct->tm_year,&TempTimeStruct->tm_mon,&TempTimeStruct->tm_mday,&TempTimeStruct->tm_hour,&TempTimeStruct->tm_min,&TempTimeStruct->tm_sec); //populating the struct I tried the overload with this: tm& tm::operator=(sql::ResultSet & results) { //CODE return *this; } however VS08 reports: error C2511: 'tm &tm::operator =(sql::ResultSet &)' : overloaded member function not found in 'tm'

  Read the article

• C++ union assignment, is there a good way to do this?

  - by Sqeaky

  I am working on a project with a library and I must work with unions. Specifically I am working with SDL and the SDL_Event union. I need to make copies of the SDL_Events, and I could find no good information on overloading assignment operators with unions. Provided that I can overload the assignment operator, should I manually sift through the union members and copy the pertinent members or can I simply come some members (this seems dangerous to me), or maybe just use memcpy() (this seems simple and fast, but slightly dangerous)? If I can't overload operators what would my best options be from there? I guess I could make new copies and pass around a bunch of pointers, but in this situation I would prefer not to do that. Any ideas welcome!

  Read the article

• C++ is there a difference between assignment inside a pass by value and pass by reference function?

  - by Rémy DAVID

  Is there a difference between foo and bar: class A { Object __o; void foo(Object& o) { __o = o; } void bar(Object o) { __o = o; } } As I understand it, foo performs no copy operation on object o when it is called, and one copy operation for assignment. Bar performs one copy operation on object o when it is called and another one for assignment. So I can more or less say that foo uses 2 times less memory than bar (if o is big enough). Is that correct ? Is it possible that the compiler optimises the bar function to perform only one copy operation on o ? i.e. makes __o pointing on the local copy of argument o instead of creating a new copy?

  Read the article

• Iterative and Incremental Principle Series 1: The Dreaded Assignment

  - by llowitz

  A few days ago, while making breakfast for my teenage son… he turned to me and happily exclaimed, “I really like how my high school Government class assigns our reading homework.  In middle school, we had to read a chapter each week.  Everyone dreaded it.  In high school, our teacher assigns us a section or two every day.  We still end up reading a chapter each week, but this way is so much easier and I’m actually remembered what I’ve read!” Wow!  Once I recovered from my initial shock that my high school son actually initiated conversation with me, it struck me that he was describing one of the five basic OUM principles -- Iterative and Incremental.   Not only did he describe how his teacher divided a week long assignment into daily increments, but he went on to communicate some of the major benefits of having shorter, more achievable milestones.  I started to think about other applications of the iterative and incremental approach and I realized that I had incorporated this approach when I recently rededicated myself to physical fitness.  Join me over the next four days as I present an Iterative and Incremental blog series where I relate my personal experience incorporating the iterative and incremental approach and the benefits that I achieved.

  Read the article

• When initializing in C# constructors what's better: initializer lists or assignment?

  - by user260197

  Class A uses an initializer list to set the member to the paramter value, while Class B uses assignment within the constructor's body. Can anyone give any reason to prefer one over the other as long as I'm consistent? class A { String _filename; A(String filename) : _filename(filename) { } } class B { String _filename; B(String filename) { _filename = filename; } }

  Read the article

• Has anyone found the need to declare the return parameter of a copy assignment operator const?

  - by Keith

  The copy assignment operator has the usual signature: my_class & operator = (my_class const & rhs); Does the following signature have any practical use? my_class const & operator = (my_class const & rhs); You can only define one or the other, but not both.

  Read the article

• Oracle HRMS API – Update Employee Assignment

  - by PRajkumar

  To Update Supervisor, Manager Flag, Bargaining Unit, Labour Union Member Flag, Gre, Time Card, Work Schedule, Normal Hours, Frequency, Time Normal Finish, Time Normal Start, Default Code Combination, Set of Books Id API -- hr_assignment_api.update_emp_asg   To Update Grade, Location, Job, Payroll, Organization, Employee Category, People Group API -- hr_assignment_api.update_emp_asg_criteria   Example --   DECLARE    -- Local Variables    -- -----------------------    lc_dt_ud_mode           VARCHAR2(100)    := NULL;    ln_assignment_id       NUMBER                  := 33561;    ln_supervisor_id        NUMBER                  := 2;    ln_object_number       NUMBER                  := 1;    ln_people_group_id  NUMBER                  := 1;      -- Out Variables for Find Date Track Mode API    -- -----------------------------------------------------------------    lb_correction                           BOOLEAN;    lb_update                                 BOOLEAN;    lb_update_override              BOOLEAN;    lb_update_change_insert   BOOLEAN;       -- Out Variables for Update Employee Assignment API    -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------    ln_soft_coding_keyflex_id       HR_SOFT_CODING_KEYFLEX.SOFT_CODING_KEYFLEX_ID%TYPE;    lc_concatenated_segments       VARCHAR2(2000);    ln_comment_id                             PER_ALL_ASSIGNMENTS_F.COMMENT_ID%TYPE;    lb_no_managers_warning        BOOLEAN;  -- Out Variables for Update Employee Assgment Criteria  -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------  ln_special_ceiling_step_id                    PER_ALL_ASSIGNMENTS_F.SPECIAL_CEILING_STEP_ID%TYPE;  lc_group_name                                          VARCHAR2(30);  ld_effective_start_date                             PER_ALL_ASSIGNMENTS_F.EFFECTIVE_START_DATE%TYPE;  ld_effective_end_date                              PER_ALL_ASSIGNMENTS_F.EFFECTIVE_END_DATE%TYPE;  lb_org_now_no_manager_warning   BOOLEAN;  lb_other_manager_warning                  BOOLEAN;  lb_spp_delete_warning                          BOOLEAN;  lc_entries_changed_warning                VARCHAR2(30);  lb_tax_district_changed_warn             BOOLEAN;   BEGIN    -- Find Date Track Mode    -- --------------------------------    dt_api.find_dt_upd_modes    (    p_effective_date                  => TO_DATE('12-JUN-2011'),         p_base_table_name            => 'PER_ALL_ASSIGNMENTS_F',         p_base_key_column           => 'ASSIGNMENT_ID',         p_base_key_value               => ln_assignment_id,          -- Output data elements          -- --------------------------------          p_correction                          => lb_correction,          p_update                                => lb_update,          p_update_override              => lb_update_override,          p_update_change_insert   => lb_update_change_insert      );      IF ( lb_update_override = TRUE OR lb_update_change_insert = TRUE )    THEN        -- UPDATE_OVERRIDE        -- ---------------------------------        lc_dt_ud_mode := 'UPDATE_OVERRIDE';    END IF;     IF ( lb_correction = TRUE )   THEN       -- CORRECTION       -- ----------------------      lc_dt_ud_mode := 'CORRECTION';   END IF;     IF ( lb_update = TRUE )   THEN       -- UPDATE       -- --------------       lc_dt_ud_mode := 'UPDATE';    END IF;     -- Update Employee Assignment   -- ---------------------------------------------  hr_assignment_api.update_emp_asg  ( -- Input data elements   -- ------------------------------   p_effective_date                              => TO_DATE('12-JUN-2011'),   p_datetrack_update_mode         => lc_dt_ud_mode,   p_assignment_id                            => ln_assignment_id,   p_supervisor_id                              => NULL,   p_change_reason                           => NULL,   p_manager_flag                              => 'N',   p_bargaining_unit_code              => NULL,   p_labour_union_member_flag   => NULL,   p_segment1                                       => 204,   p_segment3                                       => 'N',   p_normal_hours                              => 10,   p_frequency                                       => 'W',   -- Output data elements   -- -------------------------------   p_object_version_number             => ln_object_number,   p_soft_coding_keyflex_id              => ln_soft_coding_keyflex_id,   p_concatenated_segments             => lc_concatenated_segments,   p_comment_id                                   => ln_comment_id,   p_effective_start_date                      => ld_effective_start_date,   p_effective_end_date                        => ld_effective_end_date,   p_no_managers_warning               => lb_no_managers_warning,   p_other_manager_warning            => lb_other_manager_warning  );    -- Find Date Track Mode for Second API   -- ------------------------------------------------------   dt_api.find_dt_upd_modes   (  p_effective_date                   => TO_DATE('12-JUN-2011'),      p_base_table_name            => 'PER_ALL_ASSIGNMENTS_F',      p_base_key_column           => 'ASSIGNMENT_ID',      p_base_key_value               => ln_assignment_id,      -- Output data elements      -- -------------------------------      p_correction                           => lb_correction,      p_update                                 => lb_update,      p_update_override               => lb_update_override,      p_update_change_insert    => lb_update_change_insert   );     IF ( lb_update_override = TRUE OR lb_update_change_insert = TRUE )   THEN     -- UPDATE_OVERRIDE     -- --------------------------------     lc_dt_ud_mode := 'UPDATE_OVERRIDE';   END IF;      IF ( lb_correction = TRUE )    THEN      -- CORRECTION      -- ----------------------      lc_dt_ud_mode := 'CORRECTION';   END IF;      IF ( lb_update = TRUE )    THEN      -- UPDATE      -- --------------      lc_dt_ud_mode := 'UPDATE';    END IF;    -- Update Employee Assgment Criteria  -- -----------------------------------------------------  hr_assignment_api.update_emp_asg_criteria  ( -- Input data elements   -- ------------------------------   p_effective_date                                   => TO_DATE('12-JUN-2011'),   p_datetrack_update_mode               => lc_dt_ud_mode,   p_assignment_id                                 => ln_assignment_id,   p_location_id                                        => 204,   p_grade_id                                             => 29,   p_job_id                                                  => 16,   p_payroll_id                                          => 52,   p_organization_id                               => 239,   p_employment_category                    => 'FR',   -- Output data elements   -- -------------------------------   p_people_group_id                              => ln_people_group_id,   p_object_version_number                   => ln_object_number,   p_special_ceiling_step_id                  => ln_special_ceiling_step_id,   p_group_name                                        => lc_group_name,   p_effective_start_date                           => ld_effective_start_date,   p_effective_end_date                             => ld_effective_end_date,   p_org_now_no_manager_warning  => lb_org_now_no_manager_warning,   p_other_manager_warning                 => lb_other_manager_warning,   p_spp_delete_warning                         => lb_spp_delete_warning,   p_entries_changed_warning              => lc_entries_changed_warning,   p_tax_district_changed_warning     => lb_tax_district_changed_warn  );    COMMIT; EXCEPTION          WHEN OTHERS THEN                       ROLLBACK;                       dbms_output.put_line(SQLERRM); END; / SHOW ERR;    

  Read the article

• Move constructor and assignment operator: why no default for derived classes?

  - by doublep

  Why there is default move constructor or assignment operator not created for derived classes? To demonstrate what I mean; having this setup code: #include <utility> struct A { A () { } A (A&&) { throw 0; } A& operator= (A&&) { throw 0; } }; struct B : A { }; either of the following lines throws: A x (std::move (A ()); A x; x = A (); but neither of the following does: B x (std::move (B ()); B x; x = B (); In case it matters, I tested with GCC 4.4.

  Read the article

• Why would the assignment operator ever do something different than its matching constructor?

  - by Neil G

  I was reading some boost code, and came across this: inline sparse_vector &assign_temporary(sparse_vector &v) { swap(v); return *this; } template<class AE> inline sparse_vector &operator=(const sparse_vector<AE> &ae) { self_type temporary(ae); return assign_temporary(temporary); } It seems to be mapping all of the constructors to assignment operators. Great. But why did C++ ever opt to make them do different things? All I can think of is scoped_ptr?

  Read the article

• Implementing a non-public assignment operator with a public named method?

  - by Casey

  It is supposed to copy an AnimatedSprite. I'm having second thoughts that it has the unfortunate side effect of changing the *this object. How would I implement this feature without the side effect? EDIT: Based on new answers, the question should really be: How do I implement a non-public assignment operator with a public named method without side effects? (Changed title as such). public: AnimatedSprite& AnimatedSprite::Clone(const AnimatedSprite& animatedSprite) { return (*this = animatedSprite); } protected: AnimatedSprite& AnimatedSprite::operator=(const AnimatedSprite& rhs) { if(this == &rhs) return *this; destroy_bitmap(this->_frameImage); this->_frameImage = create_bitmap(rhs._frameImage->w, rhs._frameImage->h); clear_bitmap(this->_frameImage); this->_frameDimensions = rhs._frameDimensions; this->CalcCenterFrame(); this->_frameRate = rhs._frameRate; if(rhs._animation != nullptr) { delete this->_animation; this->_animation = new a2de::AnimationHandler(*rhs._animation); } else { delete this->_animation; this->_animation = nullptr; } return *this; }

  Read the article

• Problem with executing dssp (secondary structure assignment)

  - by Mana

  I followed a previous post to install dssp on ubuntu How to install dssp (secondary structure assignments) under 12.04? After the installation I tried to execute dssp which was in /usr/local/bin/dssp But it gave me the following error bash: /usr/local/bin/dssp: cannot execute binary file Also I tried to analyse some trajectory files from a simulation using the code do_dssp -s md.tpr -f traj.xtc But it also failed giving me the error below Reading file md.tpr, VERSION 4.5.5 (single precision) Reading file md.tpr, VERSION 4.5.5 (single precision) Segmentation fault (core dumped) Please post me a solution for this problem. Thank you!

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >