Search Results

Search found 88643 results on 3546 pages for 'code translation'.

Page 2/3546 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

• Upgrading from 12.10 to 13.04 -> dpkg: error processing sudo (--configure)

  - by Korrigan Nagirrok

  Here's the deal and reason I'm asking for your help. Last night I went on upgrading my Xubuntu 12.10 installation to 13.04, so at tty1 I run the command sudo do-release-upgrade and everything seemed to went well except that after rebooting and when I run sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade I get this error: sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring Release.gpg Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-updates Release.gpg Hit http://dl.google.com stable Release.gpg Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-backports Release.gpg Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring Release Hit http://archive.canonical.com raring Release.gpg Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net raring Release.gpg Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-updates Release Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com raring Release.gpg Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-backports Release Hit http://dl.google.com stable Release Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring/main Sources Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring/restricted Sources Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com raring Release Hit http://archive.canonical.com raring Release Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net raring Release.gpg Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring/universe Sources Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring/multiverse Sources Hit http://dl.google.com stable/main i386 Packages Get:1 http://security.ubuntu.com raring-security Release.gpg [933 B] Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring/main i386 Packages Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com raring/main Sources Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net raring Release Hit http://archive.canonical.com raring/partner i386 Packages Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring/restricted i386 Packages Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring/universe i386 Packages Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com raring/main i386 Packages Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring/multiverse i386 Packages Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net raring Release Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring/main Translation-en Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net raring/main Sources Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net raring/main i386 Packages Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring/multiverse Translation-en Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring/restricted Translation-en Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring/universe Translation-en Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-updates/main Sources Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-updates/restricted Sources Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net raring/main Sources Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-updates/universe Sources Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-updates/multiverse Sources Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-updates/main i386 Packages Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net raring/main i386 Packages Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-updates/restricted i386 Packages Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-updates/universe i386 Packages Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-updates/multiverse i386 Packages Ign http://dl.google.com stable/main Translation-en_US Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-updates/main Translation-en Ign http://archive.canonical.com raring/partner Translation-en_US Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com raring/main Translation-en_US Ign http://dl.google.com stable/main Translation-en Ign http://archive.canonical.com raring/partner Translation-en Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-updates/multiverse Translation-en Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com raring/main Translation-en Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-updates/restricted Translation-en Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-updates/universe Translation-en Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-backports/main Sources Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-backports/restricted Sources Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-backports/universe Sources Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-backports/multiverse Sources Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-backports/main i386 Packages Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-backports/restricted i386 Packages Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-backports/universe i386 Packages Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-backports/multiverse i386 Packages Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-backports/main Translation-en Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-backports/multiverse Translation-en Get:2 http://security.ubuntu.com raring-security Release [40.8 kB] Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-backports/restricted Translation-en Hit http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-backports/universe Translation-en Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net raring/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net raring/main Translation-en Get:3 http://security.ubuntu.com raring-security/main Sources [2,109 B] Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net raring/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net raring/main Translation-en Get:4 http://security.ubuntu.com raring-security/restricted Sources [14 B] Get:5 http://security.ubuntu.com raring-security/universe Sources [14 B] Get:6 http://security.ubuntu.com raring-security/multiverse Sources [14 B] Get:7 http://security.ubuntu.com raring-security/main i386 Packages [3,670 B] Get:8 http://security.ubuntu.com raring-security/restricted i386 Packages [14 B] Get:9 http://security.ubuntu.com raring-security/universe i386 Packages [2,824 B] Get:10 http://security.ubuntu.com raring-security/multiverse i386 Packages [14 B] Ign http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring/main Translation-en_US Ign http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-updates/main Translation-en_US Ign http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-updates/multiverse Translation-en_US Hit http://security.ubuntu.com raring-security/main Translation-en Ign http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-updates/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-updates/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-backports/main Translation-en_US Ign http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-backports/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-backports/restricted Translation-en_US Hit http://security.ubuntu.com raring-security/multiverse Translation-en Ign http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com raring-backports/universe Translation-en_US Hit http://security.ubuntu.com raring-security/restricted Translation-en Hit http://security.ubuntu.com raring-security/universe Translation-en Ign http://security.ubuntu.com raring-security/main Translation-en_US Ign http://security.ubuntu.com raring-security/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://security.ubuntu.com raring-security/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://security.ubuntu.com raring-security/universe Translation-en_US Fetched 50.4 kB in 6s (7,454 B/s) Reading package lists... Done Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 2 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0 B/373 kB of archives. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? Y dpkg: error processing sudo (--configure): Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting configuration. No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of ubuntu-minimal: ubuntu-minimal depends on sudo; however: Package sudo is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing ubuntu-minimal (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already Errors were encountered while processing: sudo ubuntu-minimal E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I've tried everything I thought logical, like sudo dpkg --configure -a dpkg: error processing sudo (--configure): Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting configuration. dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of ubuntu-minimal: ubuntu-minimal depends on sudo; however: Package sudo is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing ubuntu-minimal (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: sudo ubuntu-minimal sudo apt-get install -f Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 2 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0 B/373 kB of archives. After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. dpkg: error processing sudo (--configure): Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should reinstall it before attempting configuration. dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of ubuntu-minimal: ubuntu-minimal depends on sudo; however: Package sudo is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing ubuntu-minimal (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already Errors were encountered while processing: sudo ubuntu-minimal E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Can someone help me, please. Edit: Here's some more info that could be of help for anyone. The output of apt-cache policy linux-image-generic-pae linux-generic-pae is linux-image-generic-pae: Installed: (none) Candidate: 3.8.0.19.35 Version table: 3.8.0.19.35 0 500 http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ raring/main i386 Packages linux-generic-pae: Installed: (none) Candidate: 3.8.0.19.35 Version table: 3.8.0.19.35 0 500 http://pt.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ raring/main i386 Packages

  Read the article

• Good translation (manually) software

  - by S.Hoekstra

  I'm looking for a good translation software. i do not mean something that does all the translation automatically for me. But rather something that aids me in translating large pieces of text, since it has to be a perfect translation i can't leave it to computers alone. Something like http://translate.google.com/toolkit but with more options/functions would be great. Preferably freeware ofcourse (But paid is not a problem). At the moment i use the Google toolkit since it's adequate for now, but i really need something more advanced. But looking for such software on google etc. is really hard because of the confusion with translation services and things like babelfish. Do you know any software like this? and maybe want to share your thoughts/experiences.

  Read the article

• Translatability Guidelines for Usability Professionals

  - by ultan o'broin

  There is a clearly a demand for translatability guidelines aimed at usability professionals working in the enterprise applications space, judging by Google Analytics and the interest generated in the Twitterverse by my previous post on the subject. So let's continue the conversation. I'll flesh out each of the original points a bit more in posts over the coming weeks. Bear in mind that large-scale enterprise translation is a process. It needs to be scalable, repeatable, maintainable, and above meet the requirements of automation. That doesn't mean the user experience needs to suffer, however. So, stay tuned for some translatability best practices for usability professionals....

  Read the article

• Text Expansion Awareness for UX Designers: Points to Consider

  - by ultan o'broin

  Awareness of translated text expansion dynamics is important for enterprise applications UX designers (I am assuming all source text for translation is in English, though apps development can takes place in other natural languages too). This consideration goes beyond the standard 'character multiplication' rule and must take into account the avoidance of other layout tricks that a designer might be tempted to try. Follow these guidelines. For general text expansion, remember the simple rule that the shorter the word is in the English, the longer it will need to be in English. See the examples provided by Richard Ishida of the W3C and you'll get the idea. So, forget the 30 percent or one inch minimum expansion rule of the old Forms days. Unfortunately remembering convoluted text expansion rules, based as a percentage of the US English character count can be tough going. Try these: Up to 10 characters: 100 to 200% 11 to 20 characters: 80 to 100% 21 to 30 characters: 60 to 80% 31 to 50 characters: 40 to 60% 51 to 70 characters: 31 to 40% Over 70 characters: 30% (Source: IBM) So it might be easier to remember a rule that if your English text is less than 20 characters then allow it to double in length (200 percent), and then after that assume an increase by half the length of the text (50%). (Bear in mind that ADF can apply truncation rules on some components in English too). (If your text is stored in a database, developers must make sure the table column widths can accommodate the expansion of your text when translated based on byte size for the translated character and not numbers of characters. Use Unicode. One character does not equal one byte in the multilingual enterprise apps world.) Rely on a graceful transformation of translated text. Let all pages to resize dynamically so the text wraps and flow naturally. ADF pages supports this already. Think websites. Don't hard-code alignments. Use Start and End properties on components and not Left or Right. Don't force alignments of components on the page by using texts of a certain length as spacers. Use proper label positioning and anchoring in ADF components or other technologies. Remember that an increase in text length means an increase in vertical space too when pages are resized. So don't hard-code vertical heights for any text areas. Don't be tempted to manually create text or printed reports this way either. They cannot be translated successfully, and are very difficult to maintain in English. Use XML, HTML, RTF and so on. Check out what Oracle BI Publisher offers. Don't force wrapping by using tricks such as /n or /t characters or HTML BR tags or forced page breaks. Once the text is translated the alignment will be destroyed. The position of the breaking character or tag would need to be moved anyway, or even removed. When creating tables, then use table components. Don't use manually created tables that reply on word length to maintain column and row alignment. For example, don't use codeblock elements in HTML; use the proper table elements instead. Once translated, the alignment of manually formatted tabular data is destroyed. Finally, if there is a space restriction, then don't use made-up acronyms, abbreviations or some form of daft text speak to save space. Besides being incomprehensible in English, they may need full translations of the shortened words, even if they can be figured out. Use approved or industry standard acronyms according to the UX style rules, not as a space-saving device. Restricted Real Estate on Mobile Devices On mobile devices real estate is limited. Using shortened text is fine once it is comprehensible. Users in the mobile space prefer brevity too, as they are on the go, performing three-minute tasks, with no time to read lengthy texts. Using fragments and lightning up on unnecessary articles and getting straight to the point with imperative forms of verbs makes sense both on real estate and user experience grounds.

  Read the article

• Do abstractions have to reduce code readability?

  - by Martin Blore

  A good developer I work with told me recently about some difficulty he had in implementing a feature in some code we had inherited; he said the problem was that the code was difficult to follow. From that, I looked deeper into the product and realised how difficult it was to see the code path. It used so many interfaces and abstract layers, that trying to understand where things began and ended was quite difficult. It got me thinking about the times I had looked at past projects (before I was so aware of clean code principles) and found it extremely difficult to get around in the project, mainly because my code navigation tools would always land me at an interface. It would take a lot of extra effort to find the concrete implementation or where something was wired up in some plugin type architecture. I know some developers strictly turn down dependency injection containers for this very reason. It confuses the path of the software so much that the difficulty of code navigation is exponentially increased. My question is: when a framework or pattern introduces so much overhead like this, is it worth it? Is it a symptom of a poorly implemented pattern? I guess a developer should look to the bigger picture of what that abstractions brings to the project to help them get through the frustration. Usually though, it's difficult to make them see that big picture. I know I've failed to sell the needs of IOC and DI with TDD. For those developers, use of those tools just cramps code readability far too much.

  Read the article

• Please recommend citations for source code documentation standards

  - by Aerik

  I'm trying to convince another group in my company that they need to provide more documentation in their source code (they want to hand off the code to my group) but they're treating it as a "nice to have". In my view, it's a necessity. I've run a source code analysis tool and it's showing about 10% comment lines - but looking at the source code, most of that is coming from entire functions that the author has commented out. Can anyone provide some authoritative citations / references for documentation / comment standards for source code? (In case it matters, we're a C# house, with a little Matlab thrown in).

  Read the article

• Does code-generation increase the code quality?

  - by platzhirsch

  Arguing for code-generation I am looking for some reasons, if howsoever, code generation increases the code quality, respectively is in favor for quality insurance. To clarify what I mean with code-generation I can talk only about a project of mine: We use XML files to describe different relationships, in fact our database schema. These XML files are used to generate our ORM framework and HTML forms which can be used to add, delete and modify entities. To my mind, it increases the quality, as the human error is reduced. If someone was implemented wrong, it is broken in the model. This is good, because the error might appear a lot faster, as more generated code is broken, too.

  Read the article

• How to measure code quality? [closed]

  - by Lo Wai Lun

  Is there a methodology or any objective standard to determine whether the code of the project is well-written? How to measure in a structural and scientific manner to access the quality of the code? Many people say code review is important and always do encapsulation and data abstraction to ensure the quality. How can we determine the quality? Can a structural, organised software design diagrams drawn implies good quality of code ? If we type the code with good cautions of encapsulation and data abstraction, why review anyway?

  Read the article

• Quantal: Broken apt-index, cant fix dependencies

  - by arcyqwerty

  I can't seem to add/remove/update packages Ubuntu software update has a notice about partial upgrades but fails Seems to be similar to this problem $ sudo apt-get update Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com quantal InRelease Ign http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security InRelease Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise InRelease Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com precise InRelease Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates InRelease Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports InRelease Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise InRelease Ign http://archive.canonical.com precise InRelease Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise InRelease Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise InRelease Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com quantal Release.gpg Get:1 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security Release.gpg [198 B] Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise Release.gpg Get:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise Release.gpg [198 B] Get:3 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates Release.gpg [198 B] Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise Release.gpg Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release.gpg Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release.gpg Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com quantal Release Get:4 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security Release [49.6 kB] Get:5 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports Release.gpg [198 B] Get:6 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise Release [49.6 kB] Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise Release Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise Release Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release.gpg Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com quantal/main amd64 Packages Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main Sources Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise/partner Sources Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release Get:7 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates Release [49.6 kB] Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main amd64 Packages Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main i386 Packages Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com quantal/main i386 Packages Hit http://archive.ubuntu.com quantal/main Translation-en Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise/partner amd64 Packages Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise/partner i386 Packages Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Sources Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main amd64 Packages Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main i386 Packages Get:8 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports Release [49.6 kB] Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Sources Get:9 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/main Sources [22.5 kB] Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main amd64 Packages Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main i386 Packages Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Sources Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main amd64 Packages Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main i386 Packages Get:10 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Sources [934 kB] Get:11 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted Sources [14 B] Get:12 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe Sources [7,832 B] Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com quantal/main Translation-en_US Get:13 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse Sources [713 B] Get:14 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/main amd64 Packages [67.8 kB] Ign http://archive.canonical.com precise/partner Translation-en_US Get:15 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted amd64 Packages [14 B] Get:16 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe amd64 Packages [18.8 kB] Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.canonical.com precise/partner Translation-en Get:17 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse amd64 Packages [1,155 B] Get:18 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/main i386 Packages [70.2 kB] Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en_US Get:19 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted i386 Packages [14 B] Get:20 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe i386 Packages [19.0 kB] Get:21 http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse i386 Packages [1,394 B] Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/main Translation-en Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse Translation-en Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted Translation-en Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en Hit http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe Translation-en Ign http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/main Translation-en_US Ign http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://security.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe Translation-en_US Get:22 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted Sources [5,470 B] Get:23 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe Sources [5,019 kB] Get:24 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse Sources [155 kB] Get:25 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/main amd64 Packages [1,273 kB] Get:26 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted amd64 Packages [8,452 B] Get:27 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe amd64 Packages [4,786 kB] Get:28 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse amd64 Packages [119 kB] Get:29 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/main i386 Packages [1,274 kB] Get:30 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted i386 Packages [8,431 B] Get:31 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe i386 Packages [4,796 kB] Get:32 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse i386 Packages [121 kB] Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse Translation-en Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted Translation-en Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe Translation-en Get:33 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main Sources [124 kB] Get:34 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted Sources [1,379 B] Get:35 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe Sources [30.9 kB] Get:36 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse Sources [1,058 B] Get:37 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main amd64 Packages [311 kB] Get:38 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted amd64 Packages [2,417 B] Get:39 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe amd64 Packages [85.4 kB] Get:40 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse amd64 Packages [1,829 B] Get:41 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main i386 Packages [314 kB] Get:42 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted i386 Packages [2,439 B] Get:43 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe i386 Packages [85.9 kB] Get:44 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse i386 Packages [2,047 B] Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main Translation-en Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse Translation-en Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted Translation-en Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe Translation-en Get:45 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/main Sources [1,845 B] Get:46 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/restricted Sources [14 B] Get:47 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/universe Sources [11.1 kB] Get:48 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/multiverse Sources [1,383 B] Get:49 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/main amd64 Packages [1,271 B] Get:50 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/restricted amd64 Packages [14 B] Get:51 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/universe amd64 Packages [9,701 B] Get:52 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/multiverse amd64 Packages [996 B] Get:53 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/main i386 Packages [1,271 B] Get:54 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/restricted i386 Packages [14 B] Get:55 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/universe i386 Packages [9,703 B] Get:56 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/multiverse i386 Packages [999 B] Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/main Translation-en Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/multiverse Translation-en Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/restricted Translation-en Hit http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/universe Translation-en Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en_US Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main Translation-en_US Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/main Translation-en_US Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/universe Translation-en_US Fetched 19.9 MB in 34s (571 kB/s) Reading package lists... Done $ sudo apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these. The following packages have unmet dependencies: netbase : Breaks: ifupdown (< 0.7) Breaks: ifupdown:i386 (< 0.7) E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f. $ sudo apt-get -f install Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: dh-apparmor html2text libmail-sendmail-perl libsys-hostname-long-perl Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. The following extra packages will be installed: ifupdown Suggested packages: rdnssd The following packages will be upgraded: ifupdown 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1179 not upgraded. 85 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0 B/54.1 kB of archives. After this operation, 19.5 kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? (Reading database ... 222498 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace ifupdown 0.7~beta2ubuntu8 (using .../ifupdown_0.7.1ubuntu1_amd64.deb) ... Unpacking replacement ifupdown ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/ifupdown_0.7.1ubuntu1_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite '/etc/init.d/networking', which is also in package netbase 5.0ubuntu1 Processing triggers for man-db ... Processing triggers for ureadahead ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/ifupdown_0.7.1ubuntu1_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) cat /etc/apt/sources.list # deb cdrom:[Ubuntu 12.04 LTS _Precise Pangolin_ - Release amd64 (20120425)]/ dists/precise/main/binary-i386/ # deb cdrom:[Ubuntu 12.04 LTS _Precise Pangolin_ - Release amd64 (20120425)]/ dists/precise/restricted/binary-i386/ # deb cdrom:[Ubuntu 12.04 LTS _Precise Pangolin_ - Release amd64 (20120425)]/ precise main restricted # See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to # newer versions of the distribution. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise main restricted ## Major bug fix updates produced after the final release of the ## distribution. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates main restricted ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team. Also, please note that software in universe WILL NOT receive any ## review or updates from the Ubuntu security team. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise universe deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise universe deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates universe deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates universe ## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu ## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to ## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in ## multiverse WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu ## security team. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise multiverse deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise multiverse deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates multiverse deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates multiverse ## N.B. software from this repository may not have been tested as ## extensively as that contained in the main release, although it includes ## newer versions of some applications which may provide useful features. ## Also, please note that software in backports WILL NOT receive any review ## or updates from the Ubuntu security team. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-backports main restricted universe multiverse deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security universe deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security universe deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security multiverse deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise-security multiverse ## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from Canonical's ## 'partner' repository. ## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by Canonical and the ## respective vendors as a service to Ubuntu users. deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu precise partner deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu precise partner ## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by third-party ## developers who want to ship their latest software. deb http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise main deb-src http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu precise main deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal main

  Read the article

• sudo apt-get update problem

  - by Jeon

  I have a problem with sudo apt-get update that I can't seem to fix and It's causing problems with alot of installations I want to do. I run Ubuntu 12.04. Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise InRelease Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates InRelease Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports InRelease Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security InRelease Get:1 http://repository.spotify.com stable InRelease [2,979 B] Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise InRelease Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com precise InRelease Ign http://archive.canonical.com precise InRelease Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise InRelease Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise InRelease Ign http://repository.spotify.com stable InRelease Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise Release.gpg Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates Release.gpg Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports Release.gpg Ign http://repository.spotify.com stable/non-free amd64 Packages/DiffIndex Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release.gpg Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release.gpg Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise Release.gpg Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise Release.gpg Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security Release.gpg Ign http://repository.spotify.com stable/non-free i386 Packages/DiffIndex Ign http://repository.spotify.com stable/non-free TranslationIndex Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release.gpg Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise Release Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise Release Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise Release Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates Release Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise/partner amd64 Packages Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main Sources Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports Release Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security Release Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release Hit http://archive.canonical.com precise/partner i386 Packages Ign http://archive.canonical.com precise/partner TranslationIndex Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise Release Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main amd64 Packages Hit http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main i386 Packages Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/main TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/restricted TranslationIndex Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Sources Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main amd64 Packages Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main i386 Packages Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main TranslationIndex Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/universe TranslationIndex Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Sources Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main amd64 Packages Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main i386 Packages Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main TranslationIndex Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Sources Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main amd64 Packages Hit http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main i386 Packages Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/main TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/universe TranslationIndex Hit http://repository.spotify.com stable/non-free amd64 Packages Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/main TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/universe TranslationIndex Hit http://repository.spotify.com stable/non-free i386 Packages Ign http://archive.canonical.com precise/partner Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/main TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/universe TranslationIndex Ign http://repository.spotify.com stable/non-free Translation-en_US Ign http://archive.canonical.com precise/partner Translation-en Ign http://repository.spotify.com stable/non-free Translation-en Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en_US Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net precise/main Translation-en Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/main Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/restricted Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/universe Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/multiverse Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/main amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/restricted amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/universe amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/multiverse amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/main i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/restricted i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/universe i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise/multiverse i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/main Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/restricted Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/universe Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/multiverse Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/main amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/restricted amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/universe amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/multiverse amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/main i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/restricted i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/universe i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/multiverse i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/main Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/restricted Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/universe Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/multiverse Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/main amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/restricted amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/universe amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/multiverse amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/main i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/restricted i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/universe i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/multiverse i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/main Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/restricted Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/universe Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/multiverse Sources 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/main amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/restricted amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/universe amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/multiverse amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/main i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/restricted i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/universe i386 Packages 404 Not Found Err http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/multiverse i386 Packages 404 Not Found Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/main Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/multiverse Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/restricted Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise/universe Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/main Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/multiverse Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/restricted Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-updates/universe Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/main Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/multiverse Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/restricted Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-backports/universe Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/main Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/multiverse Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/multiverse Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/restricted Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/restricted Translation-en Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/universe Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.availo.se precise-security/universe Translation-en Fetched 2,979 B in 9s (328 B/s) W: GPG error: http://repository.spotify.com stable InRelease: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 082CCEDF94558F59 W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/restricted/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/universe/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/multiverse/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/restricted/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/universe/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/multiverse/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/restricted/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/universe/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/restricted/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/universe/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/multiverse/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/restricted/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/universe/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/multiverse/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/restricted/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/universe/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/restricted/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/universe/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/multiverse/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/restricted/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/universe/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/multiverse/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/restricted/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/universe/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/main/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/restricted/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/universe/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/multiverse/source/Sources 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/restricted/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/universe/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/multiverse/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/main/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/restricted/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/universe/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.availo.se/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages 404 Not Found E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead. I would appreciate a fix to this. Thank you for the help.

  Read the article

• Review quality of code

  - by magol

  I have been asked to quality review two code bases. I've never done anything like that, and need advice on how to perform it and report it. Background There are two providers of code, one in VB and one in C (ISO 9899:1999 (C99)). These two programs do not work so well together, and of course, the two suppliers blames each other. I will therefore as a independent person review both codes, on a comprehensive level review the quality of the codes to find out where it is most likely that the problem lies. I will not try to find problems, but simply review the quality and how simple it is to manage and understand the code. Edit: I have yet not received much information about what the problem consists of. I've just been told that I will examine the code in terms of quality. Not so much more. I do not know the background to why they took this decision.

  Read the article

• Is Code Complete still Code Complete? [closed]

  - by Peter Turner

  It's been quite a few years since Code Complete was published. I really love the book, I keep it in the bathroom at the office and read a little out of it once or twice a day. But I don't think it's possible to call Code Complete, "Code Complete" when it doesn't have language features that even Delphi has, like anonymous methods and generics. What key sections are missing from this book, and what should be deprecated?

  Read the article

• How to Code Faster (Without Sacrificing Quality)

  - by ashes999

  I've been a professional coder for a several years. The comments about my code have generally been the same: writes great code, well-tested, but could be faster. So how do I become a faster coder, without sacrificing quality? For the sake of this question, I'm going to limit the scope to C#, since that's primarily what I code (for fun) -- or Java, which is similar enough in many ways that matter. Things that I'm already doing: Write the minimal solution that will get the job done Write a slew of automated tests (prevents regressions) Write (and use) reusable libraries for all kinds of things Use well-known technologies where they work well (eg. Hibernate) Use design patterns where they fit into place (eg. Singleton) These are all great, but I don't feel like my speed is increasing over time. I do care, because if I can do something to increase my productivity (even by 10%), that's 10% faster than my competitors. (Not that I have any.) Besides which, I've consistently gotten this feeback from my managers -- whether it was small-scale Flash development or enterprise Java/C++ development. Edit: There seem to be a lot of questions about what I mean by fast, and how I know I'm slow. Let me clarify with some more details. I worked in small and medium-sized teams (5-50 people) in various companies over various projects and various technologies (Flash, ASP.NET, Java, C++). The observation of my managers (which they told me directly) is that I'm "slow." Part of this is because a significant number of my peers sacrificed quality for speed; they wrote code that was buggy, hard to read, hard to maintain, and difficult to write automated tests for. My code generally is well-documented, readable, and testable. At Oracle, I would consistently solve bugs slower than other team-members. I know this, because I would get comments to that effect; this means that other (yes, more senior and experienced) developers could do my work in less time than it took me, at nearly the same quality (readability, maintainability, and testability). Why? What am I missing? How can I get better at this? My end goal is simple: if I can make product X in 40 hours today, and I can improve myself somehow so that I can create the same product at 20, 30, or even 38 hours tomorrow, that's what I want to know -- how do I get there? What process can I use to continually improve? I had thought it was about reusing code, but that's not enough, it seems.

  Read the article

• Picking a code review tool

  - by marcog

  We are a startup looking to migrate from Fogbugz/Kiln to a new issue tracker/code review system. We are very happy with Jira, especially the configurability, but we are undecided on a code review tool. We have been trialing Bitbucket, but it doesn't fit our workflow well. Here are the problems we have identified with BB: Comments can be hard to find: when commenting on code not visible in the diff when code that is commented on is later changed viewing the full file doesn't include comments (also doesn't show changes) Viewing comments on individual commits can be a pain We have the implementer merge the diff and close the issue, whereas pull requests are more suited to the open source model where someone with commit rights merges We would like to automate creation of the code review (either from Jira or a command line tool) No syntax highlighting Once the pull request exceeds a certain size, BB won't show the whole thing and you have to view individual commits Linking BB pull requests to Jira issues is a bit janky: we have a pull request URL field on Jira, but this doesn't work when there are changes in multiple repositories Does anyone have any good suggestion given the above? We are tight on budget, and Jira integration is a big plus. We also have multiple commits per issue, and would like to have the option of viewing individual commits in the review. It might also be worth noting that we have a separate reviewer and tester for each issue.

  Read the article

• Code Golf: Code 39 Bar Code

  - by gwell

  The challenge The shortest code by character count to draw an ASCII representation of a Code 39 bar code. Wikipedia article about Code 39: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_39 Input The input will be a string of legal characters for Code 39 bar codes. This means 43 characters are valid: 0-9 A-Z (space) and -.$/+%. The * character will not appear in the input as it is used as the start and stop characters. Output Each character encoded in Code 39 bar codes have nine elements, five bars and four spaces. Bars will be represented with # characters, and spaces will be represented with the space character. Three of the nine elements will be wide. The narrow elements will be one character wide, and the wide elements will be three characters wide. A inter-character space of a single space should be added between each character pattern. The pattern should be repeated so that the height of the bar code is eight characters high. The start/stop character * (bWbwBwBwb) would be represented like this: # # ### ### # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^^^ | | || | | | ||| narrow bar -+ | || | | | ||| wide space ---+ || | | | ||| narrow bar -----+| | | | ||| narrow space ------+ | | | ||| wide bar --------+ | | ||| narrow space ----------+ | ||| wide bar ------------+ ||| narrow space --------------+|| narrow bar ---------------+| inter-character space ----------------+ The start and stop character * will need to be output at the start and end of the bar code. No quiet space will need to be included before or after the bar code. No check digit will need to be calculated. Full ASCII Code39 encoding is not required, just the standard 43 characters. No text needs to be printed below the ASCII bar code representation to identify the output contents. The character # can be replaced with another character of higher density if wanted. Using the full block character U+2588, would allow the bar code to actually scan when printed. Test cases Input: ABC Output: # # ### ### # ### # # # ### # ### # # ### ### ### # # # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # ### # # # ### # ### # # ### ### ### # # # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # ### # # # ### # ### # # ### ### ### # # # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # ### # # # ### # ### # # ### ### ### # # # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # ### # # # ### # ### # # ### ### ### # # # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # ### # # # ### # ### # # ### ### ### # # # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # ### # # # ### # ### # # ### ### ### # # # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # ### # # # ### # ### # # ### ### ### # # # # # ### ### # Input: 1/3 Output: # # ### ### # ### # # # ### # # # # # ### ### # # # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # ### # # # ### # # # # # ### ### # # # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # ### # # # ### # # # # # ### ### # # # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # ### # # # ### # # # # # ### ### # # # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # ### # # # ### # # # # # ### ### # # # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # ### # # # ### # # # # # ### ### # # # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # ### # # # ### # # # # # ### ### # # # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # ### # # # ### # # # # # ### ### # # # # # ### ### # Input: - $ (minus space dollar) Output: # # ### ### # # # # ### ### # ### # ### # # # # # # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # # # # ### ### # ### # ### # # # # # # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # # # # ### ### # ### # ### # # # # # # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # # # # ### ### # ### # ### # # # # # # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # # # # ### ### # ### # ### # # # # # # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # # # # ### ### # ### # ### # # # # # # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # # # # ### ### # ### # ### # # # # # # # # ### ### # # # ### ### # # # # ### ### # ### # ### # # # # # # # # ### ### # Code count includes input/output (full program).

  Read the article

• Good fix vs Quick fix [duplicate]

  - by Andrea Girardi

  This question already has an answer here: Does craftsmanship pay off? [duplicate] 16 answers Good design: How much hackyness is acceptable? [duplicate] 9 answers How do you balance between “do it right” and “do it ASAP” in your daily work? 14 answers Let's start from this principle: quality is a feature that you can't add to a project in the middle of the development process. This is the scenario: two weeks to go live with my project and, one of the developers added a specific method used only for one web application to our framework (Our framework is a bounce of java classes used to extract content from MongoDB, Alfresco, mySql and it's used by web applications). I'm the team leader and I told him to generalize the method to keep the framework to keep reusable but he said "no, I prefer don't do that because there are a lot of bugs that need to be fixed". The manager is agree with him and of course I'm not. Is it better to made extra effort to keep a framework free from any specific implementation (probably used only by one web application) or just add the methods because it works? So, my question is: is it correct to write code that only works or is better to write code that works but it doesn't sucks (i.e. adding embedded value, specific methods, extra classes, add column to database, etc)? How is it possible to justify the extra time (to be honest, this kind of fix requires 10 minutes extra to write a good generic code) to the management? How is possible to argue it's the right way to write code to young developers and PM? in general, good fix or quick fix? Ah, 10 minutes after I get the email from PM, he asked me why on a url of application 2 there was the name of application 1 during the login? I like to quote Jeff Atwood: "Don't leave "broken windows" (bad designs, wrong decisions, or poor code) unrepaired. Fix each one as soon as it is discovered. " Excerpt From: Hyperink. "How-To-Stop-Sucking-And-Be-Awesome-Instead." iBooks.

  Read the article

• Free french to english pdf translation tool

  - by pineapple

  Please suggest a free/open-source french to english translation tool for pdf files other than Google Translate

  Read the article

• How to evaluate the quality of Rails code?

  - by Fortuity

  In a code review, what do you look for to assess a developer's expertise? Given an opportunity to look at a developer's work on a real-world project, what tell-tale signs are a tip-off to carelessness or lack of experience? Conversely, where do you look in the code to find evidence of a developer's skill or knowledge of best practices? For example, if I'm looking at a typical Rails app, I would be happy to see the developer is using RSpec (showing a commitment to using test-driven development and knowledge that RSpec is currently more popular than the default TestUnit). But in examining the specs for a Rails model, I see that the developer is testing associations, which might indicate a lack of real understanding of Rails testing requirements (since such tests are redundant given that they only test what's already implemented and tested in ActiveRecord). More generally, I might look to see if developers are writing their own implementations versus using widely available gems or if they are cleaning up code versus leaving lots of commented-out "leftovers." What helps you determine the skill of a Rails developer? What's your code quality checklist?

  Read the article

• What tools do you use to let you know that methods in your codebase are getting too long?

  - by blueberryfields

  Most people seem to agree that long methods are a code smell - a sign something may not be quite right with the code contained in them. Which tools do you use to detect this smell? clarified title based on responses. also, remember: Your code will live over time, and be edited by multiple programmers Emergency fixes and changes will come in, late at night, when the writer is too tired to pay attention to smells Different programmers use different tools. A contractor with 4 screens set at maximum resolution will have a different idea of acceptable method size In this context, I'm looking for tools and methods which go beyond looking at the size of a method when it's written, or when it's being edited.

  Read the article

• Code Review tools - to use or not?

  - by liortal

  On my dev team, we're doing code reviews, however not in a proper way i believe. The issues our process suffers from: Not enough time is allocated for proper code review. Doing reviews is not mandatory - many times it is simply not done. Devs sit together for reviews, due to lack of another easy mechanism for doing it "offline" without spending both developers' time. My question is: can integration of a tool for code reviews improve the points mentioned above? Is it not needed? I would love to hear from positive/negative experiences.

  Read the article

• c++ ide & tools with clang integration

  - by lurscher

  recently i read this blog about google integrating clang parser into their code analysis tools This is something in which c++ is at least a decade behind other languages like java, but now that llvm-clang is almost c++ iso-ready, i think its possible for c++ code analysis tools to begin using the c++ parser effectively, since it has been designed from the ground up precisely for this so i'm wondering if there are existing open source or known commercial projects taking this path, integrating with clang to provide higher-level analysis tools?

  Read the article

• Where should I start reading AngularJS's source code?

  - by Abaco

  After reading this article I realized that I really didn't read any "serious" source code during my 3-years as a professional developer. Recently I started a new web-project which makes heavy use of AngularJS, so I decided to start my reading - or, better, decoding [as the blogger wrote] - activity from something that is both challenging and professionally useful. Now I just need to be pointed in the right direction. Should I just start from the start of the source code or is there a better starting point?

  Read the article

• Distinguishing repetitive code with the same implementation

  - by KyelJmD

  Given this sample code import java.util.ArrayList; import blackjack.model.items.Card; public class BlackJackPlayer extends Player { private double bet; private Hand hand01 = new Hand(); private Hand hand02 = new Hand(); public void addCardToHand01(Card c) { hand01.addCard(c); } public void addCardToHand02(Card c) { hand02.addCard(c); } public void bustHand01() { hand01.setBust(true); } public void bustHand02() { hand02.setBust(true); } public void standHand01() { hand01.setStand(true); } public void standHand02() { hand02.setStand(true); } public boolean isHand01Bust() { return hand01.isBust(); } public boolean isHand02Bust() { return hand02.isBust(); } public boolean isHand01Standing() { return hand01.isStanding(); } public boolean isHand02Standing() { return hand02.isStanding(); } public int getHand01Score(){ return hand01.getCardScore(); } public int getHand02Score(){ return hand02.getCardScore(); } } Is this considered as a repetitive code? providing that each method is operating a seperate field but doing the same implementation ? Note that hand01 and hand02 should be distinct. if this is considered as repetitive code, how would I address this? providing that each hand is a seperate entity

  Read the article

• Is it normal needing time to understand code i wrote recently

  - by user1478167

  By recently i mean some weeks ago. I am trying to continue a project i left 2 weeks ago and i need time to understand some functions i wrote(not copied from somewhere) and it takes me time. Normally i don't need to because my functions,methods etc are black boxes but when i need to change something it's really hard. Does this mean i write bad code? I am still in school and i am the only who writes/uses the code so i don't have feedback, but i am afraid that if it is difficult for me to understand it, it would be 10 times more difficult for someone else. What should i do? I write a lot of comments but most of the time are useless when reviewing. Do you have any suggestions?

  Read the article

• Adding complexity to remove duplicate code

  - by Phil

  I have several classes that all inherit from a generic base class. The base class contains a collection of several objects of type T. Each child class needs to be able to calculate interpolated values from the collection of objects, but since the child classes use different types, the calculation varies a tiny bit from class to class. So far I have copy/pasted my code from class to class and made minor modifications to each. But now I am trying to remove the duplicated code and replace it with one generic interpolation method in my base class. However that is proving to be very difficult, and all the solutions I have thought of seem way too complex. I am starting to think the DRY principle does not apply as much in this kind of situation, but that sounds like blasphemy. How much complexity is too much when trying to remove code duplication? EDIT: The best solution I can come up with goes something like this: Base Class: protected T GetInterpolated(int frame) { var index = SortedFrames.BinarySearch(frame); if (index >= 0) return Data[index]; index = ~index; if (index == 0) return Data[index]; if (index >= Data.Count) return Data[Data.Count - 1]; return GetInterpolatedItem(frame, Data[index - 1], Data[index]); } protected abstract T GetInterpolatedItem(int frame, T lower, T upper); Child class A: public IGpsCoordinate GetInterpolatedCoord(int frame) { ReadData(); return GetInterpolated(frame); } protected override IGpsCoordinate GetInterpolatedItem(int frame, IGpsCoordinate lower, IGpsCoordinate upper) { double ratio = GetInterpolationRatio(frame, lower.Frame, upper.Frame); var x = GetInterpolatedValue(lower.X, upper.X, ratio); var y = GetInterpolatedValue(lower.Y, upper.Y, ratio); var z = GetInterpolatedValue(lower.Z, upper.Z, ratio); return new GpsCoordinate(frame, x, y, z); } Child class B: public double GetMph(int frame) { ReadData(); return GetInterpolated(frame).MilesPerHour; } protected override ISpeed GetInterpolatedItem(int frame, ISpeed lower, ISpeed upper) { var ratio = GetInterpolationRatio(frame, lower.Frame, upper.Frame); var mph = GetInterpolatedValue(lower.MilesPerHour, upper.MilesPerHour, ratio); return new Speed(frame, mph); }

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >