Search Results

Search found 154 results on 7 pages for 'denial'.

Page 2/7 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  | Next Page >

  • Multiple Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerabilities in Apache Tomcat

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2011-4858 Resource Management Errors vulnerability 5.0 Apache Tomcat Solaris 11 11/11 SRU 4 Solaris 10 SPARC: 122911-29 X86: 122912-29 Solaris 9 Contact Support CVE-2012-0022 Numeric Errors vulnerability 5.0 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • CVE-2012-3401 Denial of Service vulnerability in libtiff

    - by Umang_D
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2012-3401 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer vulnerability 6.8 libtiff Solaris 11 11/11 SRU 12.4 Solaris 10 Contact Support This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Oracle's product distributions.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • CVE-2012-3461 Denial of Service vulnerability in libotr

    - by Umang_D
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2012-3461 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer vulnerability 4.3 libotr Solaris 11 11/11 SRU 12.4 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Oracle's product distributions.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • CVE-2010-4008 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability in libxml2

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2010-4008 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer vulnerability 4.3 libxml2 Solaris 10 SPARC: 125731-07 X86: 125732-07 Solaris 11 Contact Support This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • Multiple Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerabilities in libxml2

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2011-3905 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer vulnerability 5.0 libxml2 Solaris 11 Contact Support Solaris 10 SPARC: 125731-07 X86: 125732-07 Solaris 9 Contact Support CVE-2011-3919 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer vulnerability 7.5 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • Multiple Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerabilities in libxml2

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2011-2821 Resource Management Errors vulnerability 7.5 libxml2 Solaris 11 Contact Support Solaris 10 SPARC: 125731-07 X86: 125732-07 Solaris 9 Contact Support CVE-2011-2834 Resource Management Errors vulnerability 6.8 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • CVE-2012-1573 Denial of Service vulnerability in gnutls

    - by Umang_D
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2012-1573 Cryptographic Issues vulnerability 5.0 gnutls Solaris 11 11/11 SRU 12.4 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Oracle's product distributions.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • CVE-2011-1944 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability in libxml2

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2011-1944 Numeric Errors vulnerability 9.3 libxml2 Solaris 10 SPARC: 125731-07 X86: 125732-07 Solaris 9 Contact Support This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • CVE-2011-0216 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability in libxml2

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2011-0216 Numeric Errors vulnerability 9.3 libxml2 Solaris 11 Contact Support Solaris 10 SPARC: 125731-07 X86: 125732-07 Solaris 9 Contact Support This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • Security Updates Available for SQL Server 2008, 2008 R2, 2012, 2014

    - by AaronBertrand
    If you are running 2008 SP3, 2008 R2 SP2, 2012 SP1 (SP2 is not affected, RTM is no longer supported), or 2014, you'll want to check out Security Bulletin MS14-044 for details on a denial of service / privilege escalation issue that has been patched: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/MS14-044 For SQL Server 2012 and SQL Server 2014, I've blogged about recent builds and recommendations here: http://blogs.sqlsentry.com/team-posts/latest-builds-sql-server-2012/ http://blogs.sqlsentry.com/team-posts/latest-builds-sql-server-2014...(read more)

    Read the article

  • Server Recovery from Denial of Service

    - by JMC
    I'm looking at a server that might be misconfigured to handle Denial of Service. The database was knocked offline after the attack, and was unable to restart itself after it failed to restart when the attack subsided. Details of the Attack: The Attacker either intentionally or unintentionally sent 1000's of search queries using the applications search query url within a couple of seconds. It looks like the server was overwhelmed and it caused the database to log this message: Server Specs: 1.5GB of dedicated memory Are there any obvious mis-configurations here that I'm missing? **mysql.log** 121118 20:28:54 mysqld_safe Number of processes running now: 0 121118 20:28:54 mysqld_safe mysqld restarted 121118 20:28:55 [Warning] option 'slow_query_log': boolean value '/var/log/mysqld.slow.log' wasn't recognized. Set to OFF. 121118 20:28:55 [Note] Plugin 'FEDERATED' is disabled. 121118 20:28:55 InnoDB: The InnoDB memory heap is disabled 121118 20:28:55 InnoDB: Mutexes and rw_locks use GCC atomic builtins 121118 20:28:55 InnoDB: Compressed tables use zlib 1.2.3 121118 20:28:55 InnoDB: Using Linux native AIO 121118 20:28:55 InnoDB: Initializing buffer pool, size = 512.0M InnoDB: mmap(549453824 bytes) failed; errno 12 121118 20:28:55 InnoDB: Completed initialization of buffer pool 121118 20:28:55 InnoDB: Fatal error: cannot allocate memory for the buffer pool 121118 20:28:55 [ERROR] Plugin 'InnoDB' init function returned error. 121118 20:28:55 [ERROR] Plugin 'InnoDB' registration as a STORAGE ENGINE failed. 121118 20:28:55 [ERROR] Unknown/unsupported storage engine: InnoDB 121118 20:28:55 [ERROR] Aborting **ulimit -a** core file size (blocks, -c) 0 data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited scheduling priority (-e) 0 file size (blocks, -f) unlimited pending signals (-i) 13089 max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 64 max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited open files (-n) 1024 pipe size (512 bytes, -p) 8 POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200 real-time priority (-r) 0 stack size (kbytes, -s) 8192 cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited max user processes (-u) 1024 virtual memory (kbytes, -v) unlimited file locks (-x) unlimited **httpd.conf** StartServers 10 MinSpareServers 8 MaxSpareServers 12 ServerLimit 256 MaxClients 256 MaxRequestsPerChild 4000 **my.cnf** innodb_buffer_pool_size=512M # Increase Innodb Thread Concurrency = 2 * [numberofCPUs] + 2 innodb_thread_concurrency=4 # Set Table Cache table_cache=512 # Set Query Cache_Size query_cache_size=64M query_cache_limit=2M # A sort buffer is used for optimizing sorting sort_buffer_size=8M # Log slow queries slow_query_log=/var/log/mysqld.slow.log long_query_time=2 #performance_tweak join_buffer_size=2M **php.ini** memory_limit = 128M post_max_size = 8M

    Read the article

  • Multiple vulnerabilities in Mozilla Firefox

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2011-2372 Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls vulnerability 3.5 Firefox web browser Solaris 11 11/11 SRU 3 Solaris 10 Contact Support CVE-2011-2995 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 10.0 CVE-2011-2997 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 10.0 CVE-2011-3000 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability 4.3 CVE-2011-3001 Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls vulnerability 4.3 CVE-2011-3002 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 9.3 CVE-2011-3003 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 10.0 CVE-2011-3004 Improper Input Validation vulnerability 4.3 CVE-2011-3005 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 9.3 CVE-2011-3232 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability 9.3 CVE-2011-3648 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability 4.3 CVE-2011-3650 Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer vulnerability 9.3 CVE-2011-3651 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 10.0 CVE-2011-3652 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 10.0 CVE-2011-3654 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 10.0 CVE-2011-3655 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability 9.3 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Sun's product distribution.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle Sun products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • SecurityException: Permission Denial requires null

    - by Matroska
    Hi all, I would like to launch the market from a preference screen but when I try to do this I obain a java.lang.SecurityException: Permission Denial: starting Intent { cmp=com.action.test/.ui.activities.Test } from ProcessRecord{44db1300 3697:com.pippo.pluto/10067} (pid=3697, uid=10067) requires null. This is my code: startActivity(new Intent(Intent.ACTION_VIEW,Uri.parse("market://search?q=pname:com.action.test"))); what am I doing wrong? Thanks in advance Tobia

    Read the article

  • Permission denial to read from emailprovider in android

    - by Ambika
    Hello Everyone, I've the problem when I want to read "com.android.email.provider" to get email accounts. Here is my code to retrieve the account : Cursor c = null; Uri CONTENT_URI = Uri.parse("content://com.android.email.provider/account"); String RECORD_ID = "_id"; String[] ID_PROJECTION = new String[] {RECORD_ID }; c = getContentResolver().query(CONTENT_URI,ID_PROJECTION,null, null, null); I get a security exception: java.lang.SecurityException: Permission Denial: reading com.android.email.provider.EmailProvider uri content://com.android.email.provider/account from pid=278, uid=10003 requires com.android.email.permission.ACCESS_PROVIDER I want to know the account is created or not in some other app. Is there any other way to resolve this so that I can read from the provider. I have also tried by adding the permission in manifest: That dint not help. Any solution would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • SYN flooding still a threat to servers?

    - by Rob
    Well recently I've been reading about different Denial of Service methods. One method that kind of stuck out was SYN flooding. I'm a member of some not-so-nice forums, and someone was selling a python script that would DoS a server using SYN packets with a spoofed IP address. However, if you sent a SYN packet to a server, with a spoofed IP address, the target server would return the SYN/ACK packet to the host that was spoofed. In which case, wouldn't the spoofed host return an RST packet, thus negating the 75 second long-wait, and ultimately failing in its attempt to DoS the server?

    Read the article

  • Is SYN flooding still a threat?

    - by Rob
    Well recently I've been reading about different Denial of Service methods. One method that kind of stuck out was SYN flooding. I'm a member of some not-so-nice forums, and someone was selling a python script that would DoS a server using SYN packets with a spoofed IP address. However, if you sent a SYN packet to a server, with a spoofed IP address, the target server would return the SYN/ACK packet to the host that was spoofed. In which case, wouldn't the spoofed host return an RST packet, thus negating the 75 second long-wait, and ultimately failing in its attempt to DoS the server?

    Read the article

  • Multiple vulnerabilities in Adobe Flashplayer

    - by chandan
    CVE DescriptionCVSSv2 Base ScoreComponentProduct and Resolution CVE-2012-0724 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 10.0 Adobe Flashplayer Solaris 10 SPARC: 125332-24 X86: 125333-23 CVE-2012-0725 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 10.0 CVE-2012-0768 Denial of Service(DoS) vulnerability 10.0 CVE-2012-0769 Information disclosure vulnerability 5.0 CVE-2012-0772 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 10.0 CVE-2012-0773 Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability 10.0 This notification describes vulnerabilities fixed in third-party components that are included in Oracle's product distributions.Information about vulnerabilities affecting Oracle products can be found on Oracle Critical Patch Updates and Security Alerts page.

    Read the article

  • what should be limit to use for IPTABLE rate limiting for a webserver

    - by Registered User
    I see on my webserver some logs as follows 203.252.157.98 - :25:02 "GET //phpmyadmin/ HTTP/1.1" 404 393 "-" "Made by ZmEu @ WhiteHat Team - www.whitehat.ro" 203.252.157.98 - :25:03 "GET //phpMyAdmin/ HTTP/1.1" 404 394 "-" "Made by ZmEu @ WhiteHat Team - www.whitehat.ro" 203.252.157.98 - :25:03 "GET //pma/ HTTP/1.1" 404 388 "-" "Made by ZmEu @ WhiteHat Team - www.whitehat.ro" 203.252.157.98 - :25:04 "GET //dbadmin/ HTTP/1.1" 404 391 "-" "Made by ZmEu @ WhiteHat Team - www.whitehat.ro" 203.252.157.98 - :25:05 "GET //myadmin/ HTTP/1.1" 404 391 "-" "Made by ZmEu @ WhiteHat Team - www.whitehat.ro" 203.252.157.98 - :25:06 "GET //phppgadmin/ HTTP/1.1" 404 394 "-" "Made by ZmEu @ WhiteHat Team - www.whitehat.ro" 203.252.157.98 - :25:06 "GET //PMA/ HTTP/1.1" 404 389 "-" "Made by ZmEu @ WhiteHat Team - www.whitehat.ro" 203.252.157.98 - :25:07 "GET //admin/ HTTP/1.1" 404 389 "-" "Made by ZmEu @ WhiteHat Team - www.whitehat.ro" 203.252.157.98 - :25:08 "GET //MyAdmin/ HTTP/1.1" 404 392 "-" "Made by ZmEu @ WhiteHat Team - www.whitehat.ro" 203.252.157.98 - :27:36 "GET //phpmyadmin/ HTTP/1.1" 404 393 "-" "Made by ZmEu @ WhiteHat Team - www.whitehat.ro" 203.252.157.98 - :27:42 "GET //phpMyAdmin/ HTTP/1.1" 404 394 "-" "Made by ZmEu @ WhiteHat Team - www.whitehat.ro" 203.252.157.98 - :27:42 "GET //pma/ HTTP/1.1" 404 388 "-" "Made by ZmEu @ WhiteHat Team - www.whitehat.ro" 203.252.157.98 - :27:43 "GET //dbadmin/ HTTP/1.1" 404 391 "-" "Made by ZmEu @ WhiteHat Team - www.whitehat.ro" 203.252.157.98 - - "GET //myadmin/ HTTP/1.1" 404 391 "-" "Made by ZmEu @ WhiteHat Team - www.whitehat.ro" and some more as follows 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:22:57:41 "GET /pma/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 399 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:22:57:41 "GET /scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 397 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:22:57:42 "GET /sqlweb/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 401 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:22:57:42 "GET /web/phpMyAdmin/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 408 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:22:57:43 "GET /web/phpmyadmin/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 408 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:22:57:44 "GET /web/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 400 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:22:57:44 "GET /webadmin/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 403 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:22:57:45 "GET /webdb/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 401 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:22:57:45 "GET /websql/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 401 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:05:38:51 "GET /admin/phpmyadmin/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 407 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:05:38:52 "GET /admin/pma/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 404 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:05:38:52 "GET /admin/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 401 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:05:38:53 "GET /db/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 399 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:05:38:54 "GET /dbadmin/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 402 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:05:38:54 "GET /myadmin/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 403 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:05:38:55 "GET /mysql/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 401 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:05:38:55 "GET /mysqladmin/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 405 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:05:38:56 "GET /phpMyAdmin/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 405 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:05:38:56 "GET /phpadmin/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 403 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:05:38:57 "GET /phpmyadmin/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 404 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:05:38:57 "GET /pma/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 399 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:05:38:58 "GET /scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 397 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:05:38:58 "GET /sqlweb/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 401 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:05:38:59 "GET /web/phpMyAdmin/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 408 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:05:38:59 "GET /web/phpmyadmin/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 408 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:05:39:00 "GET /web/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 400 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:05:39:01 "GET /webadmin/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 403 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:05:39:01 "GET /webdb/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 401 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" 118.219.234.254 - - [19/Oct/2010:05:39:02 "GET /websql/scripts/setup.php HTTP/1.1" 404 401 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98)" I have 2 questions 1) When such an attack happens on my site then while such scanning is going on how do I detect it? (In a very less time) 2)I have decided to rate limit the IPTABLES so as to reduce such DOS attacks by some script kiddies (to scan for vulnerabilities in phpmyadmin or some other script) to some extent.So how much should it be limited so that genuine users do not get kicked out.What is the best practise for question 2?

    Read the article

  • Brainstorm: Flood/DoS/DDoS Attack prevention ideas.

    - by Gnarly
    This is not a question asking how to stop an attack. This is simply a thread for anyone and everyone to discuss ideas for preventing, dealing with, and keeping your server alive during these attacks. Do not discuss using 3rd party software, this is a place to make your own ideas and read others. Post examples if you'd like. Post ideas how to filter out flood attacks. Post ideas how to keep your server alive while being under a heavy DDoS attack.

    Read the article

  • Logging Timeout'd Request in Apache 2.X

    - by m3rLinEz
    Hello, I am migrating some applications from Apache 1.3 to 2.2. We used to run some tests where attacker opens some HTTP connection to our server, and do nothing. Apache 1.3 would log the following 408 code, for example: 126.1.86.85 - - [01/Dec/2010:06:26:19 +0000] "-" 408 - "-" 0 126.1.86.85 - - [01/Dec/2010:06:26:19 +0000] "-" 408 - "-" 0 But with Apache 2.2, nothing is logged to the log file. I run the same test by using netcat to open the connection: $ nc IP_victim PORT_victim $ nc 10.42.37.3 80 I would like to have Apache 2.2 log the same 408 code to the log file, so that we would know of attempted DoS attack from the outside. Do I need any more configuration in Apache 2 to enable this? I have tried some different configurations such as LogLevel = Debug, Timeout 30, RequestReadTimeout header=10 body=30. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Route gameserver traffic through cloudflare?

    - by Michael
    I use cloudflare for my website and we have a gameserver I was wondering if it is possible to route traffic through cloudflare. This recently sprung into my head when I realized that I could route Shoutcast through another of cloudflares port (8080) which does not do any performance enhancing or anything it just acts as a reverse proxy and stops DDoS. I then tried by setting up a subdomain with my gameserver IP cloudflared and then pinged the IP and Port. It seems to have connections but when actually connecting via the game it doesnt. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Securing against DDoS

    - by gAMBOOKa
    My client would like to have his eCommerce (custom-made) site secured from DDoS attacks. What strategies can I implement? There are multiple forms in the purchasing flow --- searching, drilling-down to the product, user information and payment and I want to avoid captchas.

    Read the article

  • Apache mod status is showing ..reading

    - by Adelave
    Recently my apache got DoS attack, it happened attacker flood SYN request to our apache, i know because at that time i have wireshark enabled. After the attack finished, i restart my apache and its all back to run normal. But the problem when i check my serverstatus from mod-status there are some threads are showing > 0-92 61968 0/0/674 R 1125 0 0.0 0.00 22.93 ? ? ..reading.. > 0-92 61968 0/0/29 R 537889 0 0.0 0.00 0.01 ? ? ..reading.. > 0-92 61968 0/0/852 R 1158 15 0.0 0.00 15.05 ? ? ..reading.. > 0-92 61968 0/0/2 R 537933 578 0.0 0.00 0.02 ? ? ..reading.. > 0-92 61968 0/0/3 R 537933 0 0.0 0.00 0.02 ? ? ..reading.. > 0-92 61968 0/0/1 R 538060 0 0.0 0.00 0.00 ? ? ..reading.. > 0-92 61968 0/0/2 R 538060 0 0.0 0.00 0.01 ? ? ..reading.. > 0-92 61968 0/0/71 R 538146 0 0.0 0.00 0.00 ? ? ..reading.. > 0-92 61968 0/0/31 R 538146 0 0.0 0.00 0.01 ? ? ..reading.. > 0-92 61968 0/0/0 R 1287665833 0 0.0 0.00 0.00 ? ? ..reading.. > 0-92 61968 0/0/0 R 1287665833 0 0.0 0.00 0.00 ? ? ..reading.. > 0-92 61968 0/0/0 R 1287665833 0 0.0 0.00 0.00 ? ? ..reading.. > 0-92 61968 0/0/0 R 1287665833 0 0.0 0.00 0.00 ? ? ..reading.. > 0-92 61968 0/0/0 R 1287665833 0 0.0 0.00 0.00 ? ? ..reading.. > 0-92 61968 0/0/0 R 1287665833 0 0.0 0.00 0.00 ? ? ..reading.. > 0-92 61968 0/0/0 R 1287665833 0 0.0 0.00 0.00 ? ? ..reading.. > 0-92 61968 0/0/0 R 1287665833 0 0.0 0.00 0.00 ? ? ..reading.. > 0-92 61968 0/0/0 R 1287665833 0 0.0 0.00 0.00 ? ? ..reading.. > 0-92 61968 0/0/0 R 1287665833 0 0.0 0.00 0.00 ? ? ..reading.. > 0-92 61968 0/0/0 R 1287665833 0 0.0 0.00 0.00 ? ? ..reading.. > 0-92 61968 0/0/0 R 1287665833 0 0.0 0.00 0.00 ? ? ..reading.. > 0-92 61968 0/0/0 K 1287665833 0 0.0 0.00 0.00 these ..reading.. are always showing even after i restart. Do you have any idea how to remove this ? and where it comes from ?

    Read the article

  • What does the arxiv.org anti-bot "search and destroy" actually do?

    - by Brian Campbell
    The lanl.arxiv.org math and scientific preprint service (formerly known as xxx.lanl.gov) has a strict policy against bots that ignore its robots.txt, Robots Beware. On that page, the have a link labelled with "Click here to initiate automated 'seek-and-destroy' against your site", which is forbidden by their robots.txt but presumably badly behaved robots will follow it, and reap the consequences. The question, what are the actual consequences? I have never had the guts to actually click on that link to see what it does. What can they be doing that is both effective and legal?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  | Next Page >