Search Results

Search found 783 results on 32 pages for 'newrelic rpm'.

Page 2/32 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • rpm -Uvh & yum install

    - by Nyxynyx
    I am new to linux and wants to understand the reason for using some commands. I am trying to install PostgreSQL on CentOs by following the instructions here. First we do rpm -ivh pgdg-centos91-9.1-4.noarch.rpm which installs the rpm package into the system. But why does it ask us to do yum install postgresql91-server (which i assume installs postgresql) again if we have used rpm -ivh to install the package? Additionally, what is the reason for adding the lines exclude=postgresql* into /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo under [base] and [updates]. Why is it that we exclude yum from accessing these packages, then use yum to install postgresql91-server?

    Read the article

  • MacBook Pro - 72k vs 54k rpm drives - Heat and Noise

    - by webworm
    I am looking at a new 15" MacBook Pro for development purposes. I am planning to run a Virtual Machine for about 50% of my work (Windows 7 x64, IIS, SQL Server, and VS 2010). The upgrade from a 54000 rpm drive to a 72000 rpm is only $45. From what I understand the faster rotational speed of the 72000 rpm drive will help virtual machine performance. However, I am concerned that additional heat and fan noise might be an issue. I will be running mostly on A/C power so decreased battery life is not a major concern for me. Since I would be running with a Core i7 processor which gives off a fair amount of heat already I was wondering if it might be best to stay at 54000 rpm for the hard drive. What do you all think? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • How to install php soap with rpm packages in centos 6.4 x86_64

    - by HPM
    I want to install php-soap, centos says: [root@LMS-Cent64 soap]# rpm -ivh php-soap-5.3.3-22.el6.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: php-common(x86-64) = 5.3.3-22.el6 is needed by php-soap-5.3.3-22.el6.x86_64 after installing php-common(x86-64): [root@LMS-Cent64 soap]# rpm -ivh php-common-5.3.3-22.el6.x86_64.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] package php-common-5.3.3-23.el6_4.x86_64 (which is newer than php-common-5.3.3-22.el6.x86_64) is already installed file /usr/lib64/php/modules/phar.so from install of php-common-5.3.3-22.el6.x86_64 conflicts with file from package php-common-5.3.3-23.el6_4.x86_64 What to do now?

    Read the article

  • Rpm removal does not remove delivered dirs and leaves garbage

    - by Jim
    I deliver an application via an RPM. This application delivers various directories and files. E.g. under /opt/internal/com a file structure is being copied. I was expecting that on rpm -e all the file structure delivered under /opt/internal/com will be removed. But it does not. There are directories in the file structure that are non-empty. Is this the reason? But these (non-empty) directories were created by the RPM installation. So I would expect that they would be "owned" by RPM and removed automatically. Is this wrong? Am I supposed to remove them manually?

    Read the article

  • Generic RPM package for Python 2.x

    - by RaphDG
    I have a python application, it can run on Python = 2.6 and it's architecture independant. I need the rpm package of this application to be installed on Fedora 14 (python 2.7) and Centos 6.2 (python 2.6). I currently use mock to build one rpm package for each "flavour" and it works well. I apparently can't install the Centos compiled rpm on Fedora. It gives me this error message : error: Failed dependencies: python(abi) = 2.6 is needed by myapp-0.9.el6.noarch Here is the relevant part of my .spec file : %{!?python_sitelib: %global python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib())")} %{!?python_sitearch: %global python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print(get_python_lib(1))")} Name: myapp Version: #VERSION# Release: #RELEASE#%{dist} Summary: myapp Group: Development/Languages License: Apache v2 Source0: %{name}-%{version}-#RELEASE#.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: python-devel BuildRequires: python-setuptools %description myapp %prep %setup -c %build %{__python} setup.py build %install %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} %{__python} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root %{buildroot} Do I really have to use mock and build 2 rpms or is there another way to create a single generic 2.x rpm package ?

    Read the article

  • Building RPM containing passwords

    - by Kuf
    I need to be able to send an RPM to customers that will install the complete server, including Apache and MySQL. The customers will install it on a clean machine. After installation, the server should connect to our main DB, so I though of including the password in the RPM somehow, encrypted if possible. The reason I'm asking this is because I'm pretty sure that it's not wise to save the password in the rpm scripts. I was hoping that someone else had a similar problem and managed to solve that somehow. If anyone knows a way to do that, or have a better idea please share!

    Read the article

  • setting up rhel 5.x RPM build server for mortal users

    - by Chen Levy
    My task is to setup a RHEL 5.x build host, that can build RPMs for mortal users. On RHEL 6.x with rpm version 4.8, I have in /usr/lib/macros: # Path to top of build area. %_topdir %{getenv:HOME}/rpmbuild On RHEL 5.x with rpm version 4.4, the %{getevn:HOME} is not available. I know that I can use /home/someuser/.rpmmacros: %_topdir /home/someuser/rpmbuild and this will work for that user, however I don't want to do this for every user separately. Moreover, since .rpmmacro will not expand ${HOME} or ~ I suspect it is unsafe to use those. This in turn make /etc/skel unstable for this task (or so I suspect). So in short, my question is: How to setup RHEL 5.x host that allow all users to build RPM packages in their home directory?

    Read the article

  • Overriding RPM public key database

    - by pilcrow
    Can rpm be persuaded to import and fetch public keys from an arbitrary pubkey database? On the same build machine I've got two automated users who each need to verify package signatures from different sources, signed under different keys. If I rpm --import pkg-source1.pub pkg-source2.pub, each user will be able to verify packages intended for the other. I'd rather each user not know about the other's public keyring. Is there a way I can specify an alternate or supplementary pubkey database on a per-user or per-rpm(8)-invocation basis?

    Read the article

  • YUM and RPM crash due to the liblua-5.1 library being missing

    - by A troubled linux newbie.
    I've been playing around with a LiveUsb install of basic Fedora with persistence. I attempted to install moonscript, which requires Lua and LuaRocks. After installing Lua and discovering there were flaws in the install which prevented LuaRocks from working, I used rpm to force Lua off so I could use yum to re-install it. The result was an error of this sort being yielded by both rpm and yum: There was a problem importing one of the Python modules required to run yum. The error leading to this problem was: liblua-5.1.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I've concluded from this that my Lua version installed a library which both yum and rpm are now connected to. Is there anyway to fix this without reformatting my drive and installing everything from scratch?

    Read the article

  • How to create an rpm without a build step

    - by infra.user
    I'm trying to create an rpm of some code which doesn't need to be built. It will just need to run a script when it's installed on the destination system (i.e. I just need the %install portion of the spec file). I've left both %build and %configure sections of my rpm spec file empty, yet rpmbuild continues to try and execute ./configure with a bunch of parameters. Does anyone know how I can have rpmbuild create the rpm without trying to run ./configure? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • RHEL 5.5 Yum Update Fails Dependency Error

    - by user65788
    I have 30 different RHEL 5.5 machines that will not update some 33 packages via Yum. Does anyone know why these packages will not install and how to correct this? Yum clean all does not fix the issue, however skip broken will allow other updates to install but I am really after a way to clear this up for good. They are stock boxes with RHEL subscription and not using any yum repositories other than Red Hat's own official repositories. They have not been updated for over a year! yum update Loaded plugins: rhnplugin, security rhel-i386-client-5 | 1.4 kB 00:00 rhel-i386-client-5/primary | 2.8 MB 00:09 rhel-i386-client-5 6607/6607 Skipping security plugin, no data Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies Skipping security plugin, no data --> Running transaction check ---> Package autofs.i386 1:5.0.1-0.rc2.143.el5_5.6 set to be updated ---> Package cpp.i386 0:4.1.2-48.el5 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: curl = 7.15.5-2.1.el5_3.5 for package: curl-devel ---> Package curl.i386 0:7.15.5-9.el5 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: cyrus-sasl-lib = 2.1.22-5.el5 for package: cyrus-sasl-devel ---> Package cyrus-sasl-lib.i386 0:2.1.22-5.el5_4.3 set to be updated ---> Package cyrus-sasl-md5.i386 0:2.1.22-5.el5_4.3 set to be updated ---> Package cyrus-sasl-plain.i386 0:2.1.22-5.el5_4.3 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: db4 = 4.3.29-10.el5 for package: db4-devel ---> Package db4.i386 0:4.3.29-10.el5_5.2 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: dbus = 1.1.2-12.el5 for package: dbus-devel ---> Package dbus.i386 0:1.1.2-14.el5 set to be updated ---> Package dbus-libs.i386 0:1.1.2-14.el5 set to be updated ---> Package dbus-x11.i386 0:1.1.2-14.el5 set to be updated ---> Package e2fsprogs.i386 0:1.39-23.el5_5.1 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: e2fsprogs-libs = 1.39-23.el5 for package: e2fsprogs-devel ---> Package e2fsprogs-libs.i386 0:1.39-23.el5_5.1 set to be updated ---> Package esc.i386 0:1.1.0-12.el5 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: expat = 1.95.8-8.2.1 for package: expat-devel ---> Package expat.i386 0:1.95.8-8.3.el5_5.3 set to be updated ---> Package firefox.i386 0:3.6.13-2.el5 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: freetype = 2.2.1-21.el5_3 for package: freetype-devel ---> Package freetype.i386 0:2.2.1-28.el5_5.1 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: gcc = 4.1.2-46.el5_4.1 for package: gcc-c++ --> Processing Dependency: gcc = 4.1.2-46.el5_4.1 for package: gcc-gfortran ---> Package gcc.i386 0:4.1.2-48.el5 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: gd = 2.0.33-9.4.el5_1.1 for package: gd-devel ---> Package gd.i386 0:2.0.33-9.4.el5_4.2 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: gnome-vfs2 = 2.16.2-4.el5 for package: gnome-vfs2-devel ---> Package gnome-vfs2.i386 0:2.16.2-6.el5_5.1 set to be updated ---> Package gnome-vfs2-smb.i386 0:2.16.2-6.el5_5.1 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: gnutls = 1.4.1-3.el5_3.5 for package: gnutls-devel ---> Package gnutls.i386 0:1.4.1-3.el5_4.8 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: gtk2 = 2.10.4-20.el5 for package: gtk2-devel ---> Package gtk2.i386 0:2.10.4-21.el5_5.6 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: hal = 0.5.8.1-52.el5 for package: hal-devel ---> Package hal.i386 0:0.5.8.1-59.el5 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: krb5-libs = 1.6.1-36.el5 for package: krb5-devel ---> Package krb5-libs.i386 0:1.6.1-36.el5_5.6 set to be updated ---> Package krb5-workstation.i386 0:1.6.1-36.el5_5.6 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: libXi = 1.0.1-3.1 for package: libXi-devel ---> Package libXi.i386 0:1.0.1-4.el5_4 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: libXrandr = 1.1.1-3.1 for package: libXrandr-devel ---> Package libXrandr.i386 0:1.1.1-3.3 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: libXt = 1.0.2-3.1.fc6 for package: libXt-devel ---> Package libXt.i386 0:1.0.2-3.2.el5 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: libgfortran = 4.1.2-46.el5_4.1 for package: gcc-gfortran ---> Package libgfortran.i386 0:4.1.2-48.el5 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: libsepol = 1.15.2-2.el5 for package: libsepol-devel ---> Package libsepol.i386 0:1.15.2-3.el5 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: libstdc++ = 4.1.2-46.el5_4.1 for package: gcc-c++ --> Processing Dependency: libstdc++ = 4.1.2-46.el5_4.1 for package: libstdc++-devel ---> Package libstdc++.i386 0:4.1.2-48.el5 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: mesa-libGL = 6.5.1-7.7.el5 for package: mesa-libGL-devel ---> Package mesa-libGL.i386 0:6.5.1-7.8.el5 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: mesa-libGLU = 6.5.1-7.7.el5 for package: mesa-libGLU-devel ---> Package mesa-libGLU.i386 0:6.5.1-7.8.el5 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: newt = 0.52.2-12.el5_4.1 for package: newt-devel ---> Package newt.i386 0:0.52.2-15.el5 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: nspr = 4.7.6-1.el5_4 for package: nspr-devel ---> Package nspr.i386 0:4.8.6-1.el5 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: nss = 3.12.3.99.3-1.el5_3.2 for package: nss-devel ---> Package nss.i386 0:3.12.8-1.el5 set to be updated ---> Package nss-tools.i386 0:3.12.8-1.el5 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: openldap = 2.3.43-3.el5 for package: openldap-devel ---> Package openldap.i386 0:2.3.43-12.el5_5.3 set to be updated ---> Package openldap-clients.i386 0:2.3.43-12.el5_5.3 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: openssl = 0.9.8e-12.el5 for package: openssl-devel ---> Package openssl.i686 0:0.9.8e-12.el5_5.7 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: pam = 0.99.6.2-6.el5 for package: pam-devel ---> Package pam.i386 0:0.99.6.2-6.el5_5.2 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: popt = 1.10.2.3-18.el5 for package: rpm-devel --> Processing Dependency: popt = 1.10.2.3-18.el5 for package: rpm-build ---> Package popt.i386 0:1.10.2.3-20.el5_5.1 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: python = 2.4.3-27.el5 for package: python-devel ---> Package python.i386 0:2.4.3-27.el5_5.3 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: rpm = 4.4.2.3-18.el5 for package: rpm-devel --> Processing Dependency: rpm = 4.4.2.3-18.el5 for package: rpm-build ---> Package rpm.i386 0:4.4.2.3-20.el5_5.1 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: rpm-libs = 4.4.2.3-18.el5 for package: rpm-devel --> Processing Dependency: rpm-libs = 4.4.2.3-18.el5 for package: rpm-build ---> Package rpm-libs.i386 0:4.4.2.3-20.el5_5.1 set to be updated ---> Package rpm-python.i386 0:4.4.2.3-20.el5_5.1 set to be updated ---> Package xulrunner.i386 0:1.9.2.13-3.el5 set to be updated ---> Package xulrunner-devel.i386 0:1.9.2.7-2.el5 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: xulrunner = 1.9.2.7-2.el5 for package: xulrunner-devel --> Processing Dependency: nss-devel >= 3.12.6 for package: xulrunner-devel --> Processing Dependency: nspr-devel >= 4.8 for package: xulrunner-devel --> Processing Dependency: libnotify-devel for package: xulrunner-devel ---> Package yelp.i386 0:2.16.0-26.el5 set to be updated rhel-i386-client-5/filelists | 16 MB 00:45 --> Finished Dependency Resolution xulrunner-devel-1.9.2.7-2.el5.i386 from rhel-i386-client-5 has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libnotify-devel is needed by package xulrunner-devel-1.9.2.7-2.el5.i386 (rhel-i386-client-5) mesa-libGLU-devel-6.5.1-7.7.el5.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: mesa-libGLU = 6.5.1-7.7.el5 is needed by package mesa-libGLU-devel-6.5.1-7.7.el5.i386 (installed) python-devel-2.4.3-27.el5.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: python = 2.4.3-27.el5 is needed by package python-devel-2.4.3-27.el5.i386 (installed) nss-devel-3.12.3.99.3-1.el5_3.2.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: nss = 3.12.3.99.3-1.el5_3.2 is needed by package nss-devel-3.12.3.99.3-1.el5_3.2.i386 (installed) libstdc++-devel-4.1.2-46.el5_4.1.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libstdc++ = 4.1.2-46.el5_4.1 is needed by package libstdc++-devel-4.1.2-46.el5_4.1.i386 (installed) xulrunner-devel-1.9.2.7-2.el5.i386 from rhel-i386-client-5 has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: nspr-devel >= 4.8 is needed by package xulrunner-devel-1.9.2.7-2.el5.i386 (rhel-i386-client-5) gcc-c++-4.1.2-46.el5_4.1.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libstdc++ = 4.1.2-46.el5_4.1 is needed by package gcc-c++-4.1.2-46.el5_4.1.i386 (installed) rpm-devel-4.4.2.3-18.el5.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: rpm-libs = 4.4.2.3-18.el5 is needed by package rpm-devel-4.4.2.3-18.el5.i386 (installed) xulrunner-devel-1.9.2.7-2.el5.i386 from rhel-i386-client-5 has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: xulrunner = 1.9.2.7-2.el5 is needed by package xulrunner-devel-1.9.2.7-2.el5.i386 (rhel-i386-client-5) nspr-devel-4.7.6-1.el5_4.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: nspr = 4.7.6-1.el5_4 is needed by package nspr-devel-4.7.6-1.el5_4.i386 (installed) libXrandr-devel-1.1.1-3.1.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libXrandr = 1.1.1-3.1 is needed by package libXrandr-devel-1.1.1-3.1.i386 (installed) libsepol-devel-1.15.2-2.el5.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libsepol = 1.15.2-2.el5 is needed by package libsepol-devel-1.15.2-2.el5.i386 (installed) libXt-devel-1.0.2-3.1.fc6.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libXt = 1.0.2-3.1.fc6 is needed by package libXt-devel-1.0.2-3.1.fc6.i386 (installed) mesa-libGL-devel-6.5.1-7.7.el5.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: mesa-libGL = 6.5.1-7.7.el5 is needed by package mesa-libGL-devel-6.5.1-7.7.el5.i386 (installed) openldap-devel-2.3.43-3.el5.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: openldap = 2.3.43-3.el5 is needed by package openldap-devel-2.3.43-3.el5.i386 (installed) openssl-devel-0.9.8e-12.el5.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: openssl = 0.9.8e-12.el5 is needed by package openssl-devel-0.9.8e-12.el5.i386 (installed) dbus-devel-1.1.2-12.el5.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: dbus = 1.1.2-12.el5 is needed by package dbus-devel-1.1.2-12.el5.i386 (installed) newt-devel-0.52.2-12.el5_4.1.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: newt = 0.52.2-12.el5_4.1 is needed by package newt-devel-0.52.2-12.el5_4.1.i386 (installed) gnome-vfs2-devel-2.16.2-4.el5.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: gnome-vfs2 = 2.16.2-4.el5 is needed by package gnome-vfs2-devel-2.16.2-4.el5.i386 (installed) gnutls-devel-1.4.1-3.el5_3.5.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: gnutls = 1.4.1-3.el5_3.5 is needed by package gnutls-devel-1.4.1-3.el5_3.5.i386 (installed) rpm-build-4.4.2.3-18.el5.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: rpm-libs = 4.4.2.3-18.el5 is needed by package rpm-build-4.4.2.3-18.el5.i386 (installed) gd-devel-2.0.33-9.4.el5_1.1.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: gd = 2.0.33-9.4.el5_1.1 is needed by package gd-devel-2.0.33-9.4.el5_1.1.i386 (installed) e2fsprogs-devel-1.39-23.el5.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: e2fsprogs-libs = 1.39-23.el5 is needed by package e2fsprogs-devel-1.39-23.el5.i386 (installed) xulrunner-devel-1.9.2.7-2.el5.i386 from rhel-i386-client-5 has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: nss-devel >= 3.12.6 is needed by package xulrunner-devel-1.9.2.7-2.el5.i386 (rhel-i386-client-5) krb5-devel-1.6.1-36.el5.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: krb5-libs = 1.6.1-36.el5 is needed by package krb5-devel-1.6.1-36.el5.i386 (installed) gcc-gfortran-4.1.2-46.el5_4.1.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libgfortran = 4.1.2-46.el5_4.1 is needed by package gcc-gfortran-4.1.2-46.el5_4.1.i386 (installed) curl-devel-7.15.5-2.1.el5_3.5.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: curl = 7.15.5-2.1.el5_3.5 is needed by package curl-devel-7.15.5-2.1.el5_3.5.i386 (installed) pam-devel-0.99.6.2-6.el5.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: pam = 0.99.6.2-6.el5 is needed by package pam-devel-0.99.6.2-6.el5.i386 (installed) rpm-build-4.4.2.3-18.el5.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: rpm = 4.4.2.3-18.el5 is needed by package rpm-build-4.4.2.3-18.el5.i386 (installed) expat-devel-1.95.8-8.2.1.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: expat = 1.95.8-8.2.1 is needed by package expat-devel-1.95.8-8.2.1.i386 (installed) gcc-c++-4.1.2-46.el5_4.1.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: gcc = 4.1.2-46.el5_4.1 is needed by package gcc-c++-4.1.2-46.el5_4.1.i386 (installed) gtk2-devel-2.10.4-20.el5.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: gtk2 = 2.10.4-20.el5 is needed by package gtk2-devel-2.10.4-20.el5.i386 (installed) gcc-gfortran-4.1.2-46.el5_4.1.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: gcc = 4.1.2-46.el5_4.1 is needed by package gcc-gfortran-4.1.2-46.el5_4.1.i386 (installed) cyrus-sasl-devel-2.1.22-5.el5.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: cyrus-sasl-lib = 2.1.22-5.el5 is needed by package cyrus-sasl-devel-2.1.22-5.el5.i386 (installed) rpm-devel-4.4.2.3-18.el5.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: popt = 1.10.2.3-18.el5 is needed by package rpm-devel-4.4.2.3-18.el5.i386 (installed) db4-devel-4.3.29-10.el5.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: db4 = 4.3.29-10.el5 is needed by package db4-devel-4.3.29-10.el5.i386 (installed) rpm-build-4.4.2.3-18.el5.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: popt = 1.10.2.3-18.el5 is needed by package rpm-build-4.4.2.3-18.el5.i386 (installed) rpm-devel-4.4.2.3-18.el5.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: rpm = 4.4.2.3-18.el5 is needed by package rpm-devel-4.4.2.3-18.el5.i386 (installed) libXi-devel-1.0.1-3.1.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libXi = 1.0.1-3.1 is needed by package libXi-devel-1.0.1-3.1.i386 (installed) hal-devel-0.5.8.1-52.el5.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: hal = 0.5.8.1-52.el5 is needed by package hal-devel-0.5.8.1-52.el5.i386 (installed) freetype-devel-2.2.1-21.el5_3.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: freetype = 2.2.1-21.el5_3 is needed by package freetype-devel-2.2.1-21.el5_3.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: libgfortran = 4.1.2-46.el5_4.1 is needed by package gcc-gfortran-4.1.2-46.el5_4.1.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: libsepol = 1.15.2-2.el5 is needed by package libsepol-devel-1.15.2-2.el5.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: libstdc++ = 4.1.2-46.el5_4.1 is needed by package gcc-c++-4.1.2-46.el5_4.1.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: mesa-libGL = 6.5.1-7.7.el5 is needed by package mesa-libGL-devel-6.5.1-7.7.el5.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: mesa-libGLU = 6.5.1-7.7.el5 is needed by package mesa-libGLU-devel-6.5.1-7.7.el5.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: freetype = 2.2.1-21.el5_3 is needed by package freetype-devel-2.2.1-21.el5_3.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: hal = 0.5.8.1-52.el5 is needed by package hal-devel-0.5.8.1-52.el5.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: libXt = 1.0.2-3.1.fc6 is needed by package libXt-devel-1.0.2-3.1.fc6.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: openldap = 2.3.43-3.el5 is needed by package openldap-devel-2.3.43-3.el5.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: libstdc++ = 4.1.2-46.el5_4.1 is needed by package libstdc++-devel-4.1.2-46.el5_4.1.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: nss-devel >= 3.12.6 is needed by package xulrunner-devel-1.9.2.7-2.el5.i386 (rhel-i386-client-5) Error: Missing Dependency: newt = 0.52.2-12.el5_4.1 is needed by package newt-devel-0.52.2-12.el5_4.1.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: gnutls = 1.4.1-3.el5_3.5 is needed by package gnutls-devel-1.4.1-3.el5_3.5.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: gnome-vfs2 = 2.16.2-4.el5 is needed by package gnome-vfs2-devel-2.16.2-4.el5.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: libXrandr = 1.1.1-3.1 is needed by package libXrandr-devel-1.1.1-3.1.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: python = 2.4.3-27.el5 is needed by package python-devel-2.4.3-27.el5.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: gcc = 4.1.2-46.el5_4.1 is needed by package gcc-c++-4.1.2-46.el5_4.1.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: libnotify-devel is needed by package xulrunner-devel-1.9.2.7-2.el5.i386 (rhel-i386-client-5) Error: Missing Dependency: popt = 1.10.2.3-18.el5 is needed by package rpm-devel-4.4.2.3-18.el5.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: openssl = 0.9.8e-12.el5 is needed by package openssl-devel-0.9.8e-12.el5.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: curl = 7.15.5-2.1.el5_3.5 is needed by package curl-devel-7.15.5-2.1.el5_3.5.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: xulrunner = 1.9.2.7-2.el5 is needed by package xulrunner-devel-1.9.2.7-2.el5.i386 (rhel-i386-client-5) Error: Missing Dependency: nspr = 4.7.6-1.el5_4 is needed by package nspr-devel-4.7.6-1.el5_4.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: nss = 3.12.3.99.3-1.el5_3.2 is needed by package nss-devel-3.12.3.99.3-1.el5_3.2.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: popt = 1.10.2.3-18.el5 is needed by package rpm-build-4.4.2.3-18.el5.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: libXi = 1.0.1-3.1 is needed by package libXi-devel-1.0.1-3.1.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: nspr-devel >= 4.8 is needed by package xulrunner-devel-1.9.2.7-2.el5.i386 (rhel-i386-client-5) Error: Missing Dependency: pam = 0.99.6.2-6.el5 is needed by package pam-devel-0.99.6.2-6.el5.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: rpm = 4.4.2.3-18.el5 is needed by package rpm-build-4.4.2.3-18.el5.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: cyrus-sasl-lib = 2.1.22-5.el5 is needed by package cyrus-sasl-devel-2.1.22-5.el5.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: gtk2 = 2.10.4-20.el5 is needed by package gtk2-devel-2.10.4-20.el5.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: dbus = 1.1.2-12.el5 is needed by package dbus-devel-1.1.2-12.el5.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: db4 = 4.3.29-10.el5 is needed by package db4-devel-4.3.29-10.el5.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: rpm-libs = 4.4.2.3-18.el5 is needed by package rpm-build-4.4.2.3-18.el5.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: gcc = 4.1.2-46.el5_4.1 is needed by package gcc-gfortran-4.1.2-46.el5_4.1.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: expat = 1.95.8-8.2.1 is needed by package expat-devel-1.95.8-8.2.1.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: gd = 2.0.33-9.4.el5_1.1 is needed by package gd-devel-2.0.33-9.4.el5_1.1.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: krb5-libs = 1.6.1-36.el5 is needed by package krb5-devel-1.6.1-36.el5.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: rpm = 4.4.2.3-18.el5 is needed by package rpm-devel-4.4.2.3-18.el5.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: rpm-libs = 4.4.2.3-18.el5 is needed by package rpm-devel-4.4.2.3-18.el5.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: e2fsprogs-libs = 1.39-23.el5 is needed by package e2fsprogs-devel-1.39-23.el5.i386 (installed) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup --problems package-cleanup --dupes rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest The repolist is yum repolist all Loaded plugins: rhnplugin, security repo id repo name status rhel-debuginfo Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5Client - i386 - Deb disabled rhel-debuginfo-beta Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5Client Beta - i386 disabled rhel-i386-client-5 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop (v. 5 for 32 enabled: 6,607 repolist: 6,607

    Read the article

  • How to install MariaDB rpms in CentOS 6.4 using rpm (not yum cmd) + handling mysql-libs conflicts

    - by Pat C
    I need to script the install of MariaDB using the rpm command in CentOS 6.4. I can't use yum since it's going to be an offline install so there's no access to the repository. The only MySQL package installed is mysql-libs as various other packages in CentOS depend on it. When I did a test install of MariaDB with yum it correctly accounted for mysql-libs and uninstalled it at the end as MariaDB could handle the dependencies after it was installed: [root@new-host-6 ~]# yum install MariaDB-client MariaDB-common MariaDB-compat MariaDB-devel MariaDB-server MariaDB-shared Loaded plugins: downloadonly, fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit, security, verify Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirrors.kernel.org * extras: mirror.keystealth.org * updates: mirror.umd.edu Setting up Install Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package MariaDB-client.x86_64 0:5.5.32-1 will be installed ---> Package MariaDB-common.x86_64 0:5.5.32-1 will be installed ---> Package MariaDB-compat.x86_64 0:5.5.32-1 will be obsoleting ---> Package MariaDB-devel.x86_64 0:5.5.32-1 will be installed ---> Package MariaDB-server.x86_64 0:5.5.32-1 will be installed ---> Package MariaDB-shared.x86_64 0:5.5.32-1 will be obsoleting ---> Package mysql-libs.x86_64 0:5.1.66-2.el6_3 will be obsoleted --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved ==================================================================================================================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size ==================================================================================================================================================================== Installing: MariaDB-client x86_64 5.5.32-1 mariadb 10 M MariaDB-common x86_64 5.5.32-1 mariadb 23 k MariaDB-compat x86_64 5.5.32-1 mariadb 2.7 M replacing mysql-libs.x86_64 5.1.66-2.el6_3 MariaDB-devel x86_64 5.5.32-1 mariadb 5.6 M MariaDB-server x86_64 5.5.32-1 mariadb 34 M MariaDB-shared x86_64 5.5.32-1 mariadb 1.1 M replacing mysql-libs.x86_64 5.1.66-2.el6_3 Transaction Summary ==================================================================================================================================================================== Install 6 Package(s) Total download size: 53 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: (1/6): MariaDB-5.5.32-centos6-x86_64-client.rpm | 10 MB 00:06 (2/6): MariaDB-5.5.32-centos6-x86_64-common.rpm | 23 kB 00:00 (3/6): MariaDB-5.5.32-centos6-x86_64-compat.rpm | 2.7 MB 00:02 (4/6): MariaDB-5.5.32-centos6-x86_64-devel.rpm | 5.6 MB 00:06 (5/6): MariaDB-5.5.32-centos6-x86_64-server.rpm | 34 MB 00:23 (6/6): MariaDB-5.5.32-centos6-x86_64-shared.rpm | 1.1 MB 00:00 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 1.3 MB/s | 53 MB 00:40 warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Header V4 DSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 1bb943db: NOKEY Retrieving key from https://yum.mariadb.org/RPM-GPG-KEY-MariaDB Importing GPG key 0x1BB943DB: Userid: "Daniel Bartholomew (Monty Program signing key) <[email protected]>" From : https://yum.mariadb.org/RPM-GPG-KEY-MariaDB Is this ok [y/N]: y Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Warning: RPMDB altered outside of yum. Installing : MariaDB-compat-5.5.32-1.x86_64 1/7 Installing : MariaDB-common-5.5.32-1.x86_64 2/7 Installing : MariaDB-server-5.5.32-1.x86_64 3/7 chown: cannot access `/var/lib/mysql': No such file or directory PLEASE REMEMBER TO SET A PASSWORD FOR THE MariaDB root USER ! To do so, start the server, then issue the following commands: '/usr/bin/mysqladmin' -u root password 'new-password' '/usr/bin/mysqladmin' -u root -h new-host-6 password 'new-password' Alternatively you can run: '/usr/bin/mysql_secure_installation' which will also give you the option of removing the test databases and anonymous user created by default. This is strongly recommended for production servers. See the MariaDB Knowledgebase at http://kb.askmonty.org or the MySQL manual for more instructions. Please report any problems with the '/usr/bin/mysqlbug' script! The latest information about MariaDB is available at http://mariadb.org/. You can find additional information about the MySQL part at: http://dev.mysql.com Support MariaDB development by buying support/new features from Monty Program Ab. You can contact us about this at [email protected]. Alternatively consider joining our community based development effort: http://kb.askmonty.org/en/contributing-to-the-mariadb-project/ Installing : MariaDB-devel-5.5.32-1.x86_64 4/7 Installing : MariaDB-client-5.5.32-1.x86_64 5/7 Installing : MariaDB-shared-5.5.32-1.x86_64 6/7 Erasing : mysql-libs-5.1.66-2.el6_3.x86_64 7/7 Verifying : MariaDB-common-5.5.32-1.x86_64 1/7 Verifying : MariaDB-server-5.5.32-1.x86_64 2/7 Verifying : MariaDB-devel-5.5.32-1.x86_64 3/7 Verifying : MariaDB-client-5.5.32-1.x86_64 4/7 Verifying : MariaDB-compat-5.5.32-1.x86_64 5/7 Verifying : MariaDB-shared-5.5.32-1.x86_64 6/7 Verifying : mysql-libs-5.1.66-2.el6_3.x86_64 7/7 Installed: MariaDB-client.x86_64 0:5.5.32-1 MariaDB-common.x86_64 0:5.5.32-1 MariaDB-compat.x86_64 0:5.5.32-1 MariaDB-devel.x86_64 0:5.5.32-1 MariaDB-server.x86_64 0:5.5.32-1 MariaDB-shared.x86_64 0:5.5.32-1 Replaced: mysql-libs.x86_64 0:5.1.66-2.el6_3 Complete! My question is, what is the equivalent way to install the MariaDB packages using the rpm command only as opposed to yum? If I do rpm -ivh MariaDB*.rpm, I will get a ton of messages like the following about conflicts with mysql-libs: file /etc/my.cnf from install of MariaDB-common-5.5.32-1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-libs-5.1.66-2.el6_3.x86_64 file /usr/share/mysql/charsets/Index.xml from install of MariaDB-common-5.5.32-1.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mysql-libs-5.1.66-2.el6_3.x86_64 I then used the --force option to install the MariaDB rpms and uninstalled mysql-lib, I didn't get any weird messages but I'm not sure that is the cleanest method to handle the conflicts and do the install. So can someone confirm that installing MariaDB with the following rpm commands would be the same as using yum to install the packages and handle mysql-libs conflicts/removal: rpm -ivh --force MariaDB*.rpm rpm -e mysql-libs Thanks for any input!

    Read the article

  • Deploy Oracle Management Agent using RPM File

    - by cristiano.toni
    Normal 0 21 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Tableau Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times","serif"; mso-ansi-language:FR;} 1) Create a rpm package on Enterprise Manager 12c a) as Root : # yum install rpmbuild # mkdir /usr/lib/oracle b) as oracle user # cd $<OMS_HOME>/bin/ # emcli get_supported_platforms ----------------------------------------------- Version = 12.1.0.3.0  Platform = Linux x86-64 ----------------------------------------------- Platforms list displayed successfully. #  emcli get_agentimage_rpm -destination=/tmp/agentRPM -platform="Linux x86-64" \ -version=12.1.0.3.0 Platform:Linux x86-64 Destination:/tmp/agentRPM Exalogic:false  Checking for disk space requirements...  === Partition Detail === Space free : 6 GB Space required : 1 GB RPM creation in progress ... Check the logs at /Oracle/gc_inst/em/EMGC_OMS1/sysman/emcli/setup/.emcli/get_agentimage_rpm_date-PM.log Copying agent image from software library to /tmp/agentRPM Setting property ORACLE_HOME to:/Oracle/middleware/oms calling pulloneoffs with arguments:/Oracle/middleware/oms/Oracle/middleware/oms/sysman/agent/ \ 12.1.0.3.0_AgentCore_226.zip12.1.0.3.0Linux x86-64/tmp/agentRPMtrue Agent Image copied successfully... Creation of RPM started... RPM creation successful. Agent image to rpm conversion completed successfully 2) Copy it on all new hosts and install it.  As Root user : c) check and install rpm file # rpm -ivh --test oracle-agt-12.1.0.3.0-1.0.x86_64.rpm  Preparing...                ########################################### [100%] # rpm -ivh oracle-agt-12.1.0.3.0-1.0.x86_64.rpm  Preparing...                ########################################### [100%] Running the prereq    1:oracle-agt             ########################################### [100%] Agent RPM installation is completed successfully. Now to configure the agent follow the below steps: 1. Edit the properties file: /usr/lib/oracle/agent/agent.properties with the correct values 2. Execute the script /etc/init.d/oracle-agt RESPONSE_FILE=/usr/lib/oracle/agent/agent.properties d) create a user for the agent: # useradd -m -d /home/em12adm -s /bin/bash -g dba -G oinstall em12adm # passwd em12adm e) Edit file /usr/lib/oracle/agent/agent.properties # vi /usr/lib/oracle/agent/agent.properties  OMS_HOST=<host_Enterprise_Manager> OMS_PORT=<HTTPS Upload Port > AGENT_REGISTRATION_PASSWORD=oracle AGENT_USERNAME=em12adm AGENT_GROUP=dba ORACLE_HOSTNAME=oraclevm-mgmt # chown -R em12adm:dba /usr/lib/oracle/agent/ Start agent and register the new host server on EM12c   #  /etc/init.d/oracle-agt RESPONSE_FILE=/usr/lib/oracle/agent/agent.properties Now you have registered on EM12C your new target host.

    Read the article

  • How do I install an rpm that complains about rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1?

    - by Jake
    Im trying to install an rpm file on CentOS 5 and Im not sure how to resolve this issues it brings up: $ rpm --install epel-release-6-5.noarch.rpm warning: epel-release-6-5.noarch.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 signature: NOKEY, key ID 0608b895 error: Failed dependencies: rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 is needed by epel-release-6-5.noarch rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 is needed by epel-release-6-5.noarch What do the lines rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 mean? is rpmlib out of date or FileDigests out of date? Whats with the syntax of something followed by parentheses? Ive tried to use yum so that it can resolve dependencies automatically but it is unable: $ sudo yum --nogpgcheck install epel-release-6-5.noarch.rpm ... Running rpm_check_debug ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve: rpmlib(FileDigests) is needed by epel-release-6-5.noarch rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) is needed by epel-release-6-5.noarch Complete! (1, [u'Please report this error in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Red%20Hat%20Enterprise%20Linux%205&component=yum']) On this page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665073, they say my rpm is out of date but then say I should request an rpm file that works with my version of rpm (which is 4.4.2.3) but I don't want to do that. How do I make my system compatible with this rpm file? Bonus points if you tell me how I can fix the public key error.

    Read the article

  • yum / rpm / make | When to use which one

    - by Saif Bechan
    I am new to Linux and am running CentOs. When I want to update or install certain software I came across three ways. Sometimes it's: yum install program rpm -i program.rpm wget program.tar.gz unpack ./configure make make install That last one is a real pain, esp when you come from windows where a program install is usually one click and then a nice guide. Now can someone please explain to me: Why are there so many different ways to do this? Which one do you recommend to use and why? Are there any other ways for installing programs?

    Read the article

  • What is the difference between yum, apt-get, rpm, ./configure && make install

    - by Saif Bechan
    I am new to Linux and am running CentOs. When I want to update or install certain software I came across three ways. Sometimes it's: yum install program rpm -i program.rpm wget program.tar.gz unpack ./configure make make install That last one is a real pain, esp when you come from windows where a program install is usually one click and then a nice guide. Now can someone please explain to me: Why are there so many different ways to do this? Which one do you recommend to use and why? Are there any other ways for installing programs?

    Read the article

  • Repository Spec file

    - by ahmadfrompk
    I have source of webfiles. I need to make a RPM for it. I have placed my source in SOURCES folder and use following spec file. But it is creating noarch rpm with 2MB size, but my source is greater than 2MB size. Its also did not attach files with this. I think i have a problem in spec file. Summary: my_project rpm script package Name: my_project Version: 1 Release: 1 Source0: my_project-1.tar.gz License: GPL Group: MyJunk BuildArch: noarch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-buildroot %description Make some relevant package description here %prep %setup -q %build %install install -m 0755 -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/opt/my_project %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %post echo " " echo "This will display after rpm installs the package!" %files %dir /opt/my_project

    Read the article

  • Incremental RPM package version "numbers" for x.y.z > x.y.z-beta (or alpha, rc, etc)

    - by Jonathan Clarke
    In order to publish RPM packages of several different versions of some software, I'm looking for a way to specify version "numbers" that are considered "upgrades", and include the differentiation of several pre-release versions, such as (in order): "2.4.0 alpha 1", "2.4.0 alpha 2", "2.4.0 alpha 3", "2.4.0 beta 1", "2.4.0 beta 2", "2.4.0 release candidate", "2.4.0 final", "2.4.1", "2.4.2", etc. The main issue I have with this is that RPM considers that "2.4.0" comes earlier than "2.4.0.alpha1", so I can't just add the suffix on the end of the final version number. I could try "2.4.0.alpha1", "2.4.0.beta1", "2.4.0.final", which would work, except for the "release candidate" that would be considered later than "2.4.0.final". An alternative I considered is using the "epoch:" section of the RPM version number (the epoch: prefix is considered before the main version number so that "1:2.4.0" is actually earlier than "2:1.0.0"). By putting a timestamp in the epoch: field, all the versions get ordered as expected by RPM, because their versions appear to increment in time. However, this fails when new releases are made on several major versions at the same time (for example, 2.3.2 is released after 2.4.0, but their version for RPM are "20121003:2.3.2" and "20120928:2.4.0" and systems on 2.3.2 can't get "upgraded" to 2.4.0, because rpm sees it as an older version). In this case, yum/zypper/etc refuse to upgrade to 2.4.0, thus my problem. What version numbers can I use to achieve this, and make sure that RPM always considers the version numbers to be in order. Or if not version numbers, other mechanism in RPM packaging? Note 1: I would like to keep the "Release:" field of the spec file for it's original purpose (several releases of packages, including packaging changes, for the same version of the packaged software). Note 2: This should work on current production versions of major distributions, such as RHEL/CentOS 6 and SLES 11. But I'm interested in solutions that don't, too, so long as they don't involve recompiling rpm! Note 3: On Debian-like systems, dpkg uses a special component in the version number which is the "~" (tilde) character. This causes dpkg to count the suffix as "negative" ordering, so that "2.4.0~anything" will come before "2.4.0". Then, normal ordering applies after the "~", so "2.4.0~alpha1" comes before "2.4.0~beta1" because "alpha" comes before "beta" alphabetically. I'm not necessarily looking to use the same scheme for RPM packages (I'm pretty sure no such equivalent exists), so this is just FYI.

    Read the article

  • RPM with RHEL: install 2 version of same package / different arch

    - by Nicolas Tourneur
    I think the title is pretty self explanatory :) Is it possible, under RHEL (v 5) to install 2 instances of the same packages with 32 bit support for one and 64 bits support for the other one? Obviously, the running host has a 64 bit kernel and has the compatibility libraries required. (in this case, we would need a 64 bits JDK and a 32 bits one). If yes, are there any special rpm flag to use (change of installation directory for instance)? Thanks in advance,

    Read the article

  • How to create RPM for 32-bit arch from a 64-bit arch server?

    - by Gnanam
    Our production server is running CentOS5 64-bit arch. Because there are no RPM available currently for SQLite latest version (v3.7.3), I created RPM using rpmbuild the very first time by following the instructions given here. I was able to successfully create RPM for 64-bit (x86_64) architecture. But am not able to create RPM for 32-bit (i386) architecture. It failed with the following errors: ... ... ... + ./configure --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --target=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib64 --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/usr/com --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-threadsafe checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking for style of include used by make... GNU checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-gcc... no checking for gcc... gcc checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.73141 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.73141 (%build) This is the command I called: rpmbuild --target i386 -ba sqlite.spec My question is, how do I create RPM for 32-bit arch from a 64-bit arch server?

    Read the article

  • Building both devel and normal version of a RPM package

    - by ereOn
    Hi, I have a library from which I'd like to create two RPM packages. While I found several links on how to create a basic RPM package, I can't find how to create a devel package (see this question if you wonder what a devel package is). What do I have to do to generate both devel and non-devel versions of my RPM package ? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • difference between compiled and installed via rpm (zypper)

    - by cherouvim
    In an openSUSE 11.1 I download, compile and install ImageMagick via: wget ftp://.../pub/graphics/ImageMagick/ImageMagick-6.7.7-0.zip unzip ImageMagick-6.7.7-0.zip cd ImageMagick-6.7.7-0 ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/ImageMagick make make install Everything works nicelly until I discover that JPG is not supported: identify -list format | grep -i jpg [nothing related to JPG returned] So I reconfigure and recompile using: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/ImageMagick --with-jpeg=yes --with-jp2=yes make make install But that changes nothing. I end up uninstalling: make uninstall and installing via zypper: zypper install ImageMagick This installed version 6.4.3 and now it does support JPG: identify -list format | grep -i jpg JPG* JPEG rw- Joint Photographic Experts Group JFIF format Any idea on what is going on here? What is a possible reason that this capability of ImageMagick was not there when compiled from source but was there when installed from rpm? Note that I don't necessarily care a lot about ImageMagick (since it now works), but generally about his kind of behaviour, becase in one way or another I've seen this happen in other ocasions as well.

    Read the article

  • Alien: .rpm -> .deb | Compability / Built per system?

    - by MaddinXx
    At the moment I'm playing a bit with alien (for OpenVZ packages on Debian) and was wondering myself about one question for which I was not able to find an answer anywhere. Therefor I thought it might be smart to ask here :) The question is... If I convert a .rpm to .deb on a system, how compatible is this .deb package? What do I mean? Will the .deb be working on other systems as well or is it per-system, e.g. that on every system the .deb package will be little different? That i386 and x86_64 are different is clear, so this doesn't need to be answered :) Examples that would be nice to know are for example: .deb built on Debian 6 64-bit - Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit (compatible?) .deb built on Debian 6 64-bit - Debian 5 64-bit (compatible?) etc. Thanks anyone reading this / helping me! Regards, Michel

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >