Search Results

Search found 783 results on 32 pages for 'newrelic rpm'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 5/32 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • Updating Samba From RPMs

    - by KnickerKicker
    My Red Hat Enterprise Edition 4 comes with Samba Version 3.0.10, which does not have support for the "inherit owner" attribute that is essential in implementing a Deny-Delete Write Once Read Many share (for examples, search google for a-shared-drop-box-using-samba). (BTW, if any body knows an alternative way to do it without updating samba, I'm all ears!) I am not all that comfortable building from source, and after hours of googling (no, I do not have a red hat subscription, so I cannot just run the up2date command), I found a whole bunch of rpms on http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/tested/rhel/4/i386/ (Samba 3.2.15 for RHEL 4)... Next, I tried updating them with the rpm -U --nodeps command, but I got file conflict errors. So I went ahead and overwrote everything (or so I thought) by using the rpm's --force option. But no good has come of all that. /usr/sbin/smbd -V still returns the old version. As of now, rpm -qa | grep samba returns, samba3-client-3.2.15-40.el4 samba-3.0.10-1.4E.2 samba-client-3.0.10-1.4E.2 system-config-samba-1.2.21-1 samba3-3.2.15-40.el4 samba-common-3.0.10-1.4E.2 samba3-winbind-3.2.15-40.el4 I cannot remove the older ones because samba-common >= 3.0.8-0.pre1.3 is needed by (installed) gnome-vfs2-smb-2.8.2-8.2.x86_64 libsmbclient.so.0()(64bit) is needed by (installed) kdebase-3.3.1-5.8.x86_64 libsmbclient.so.0()(64bit) is needed by (installed) gnome-vfs2-smb-2.8.2-8.2.x86_64 Now thats a whole bunch of dependencies that I dare not touch :) Any and all pointer are welcome at this stage. Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Httpd restart "Address already in use" error

    - by mtndesign
    I have an .rpm, which I created. In its %post part, I do some stuff, and in the end of this script, i call service httpd restart. It gives the following error: + service httpd restart Stopping httpd: [FAILED] Starting httpd: (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address [::]:81 (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address 0.0.0.0:81 no listening sockets available, shutting down Unable to open logs [FAILED] I got this from the rpm verbose installing (-vv). So I know its about httpd restart itself, nothing else. The according to netstat only one process (httpd) is listening on port 81. $ sudo netstat -nlp | grep 81 tcp 0 0 :::81 :::* LISTEN 29670/httpd I don't understand, why running http FAILS at stop, and FAILS again in start. Any ideas how to solve this?

    Read the article

  • use i3 tiling window manager in RHEL 5

    - by Peter Hamilton
    For some time I have been using the i3 tiling window manager in Ubuntu. However at my new company we use RHEL5. I would dearly love to port over all my configs but Im having some trouble... An initial (naive) approach seems that a simple yum install i3 yields no results for i3. I then used some additional rpm repos by following instructions to add the EPEL RPM Repositories but it seems i3 is only bundled for RHEL = 6. Damn. I'm fairly sure that this must be possible but I'm pretty new to the Redhat scene and am not sure how to approach this problem. Any pointers would be gratefully received!

    Read the article

  • Why does yum index get corrupted?

    - by TomOnTime
    Occasionally yum's cache gets corrupted and we see errors like this: error: db3 error(-30974) from dbenv->failchk: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recovery error: cannot open Packages index using db3 - (-30974) error: cannot open Packages database in /var/lib/rpm The workaround is rm -f /var/lib/rpm/__db* and then the next "yum" command regenerates the data. My question is: what is likely to be causing this? Is there some common task that ignores locks or has other problem that causes this? We have hundreds of CentOS machines and there is no pattern to which see this problem. It could be a "one in a million" issue, which at large scale is seen often. NOTE: I realize this is a very "open ended" question, but if an answer finds the cause, I will go back and turn the question into something more canonical that directly relates to the specific issue.

    Read the article

  • How do I prevent rpmbuild form injecting requirements into RPM package?

    - by Basilevs
    I'm creating an RPM package from native Python 2.5 one. Out corporate policy is to use python2.4 by default, so I'm adding a string Requires: python25 to a .spec file. When I look at created RPM file though, i see the following dependencies: rpm -qR -p ZSI-2.1_a1-py25.noarch.rpm /usr/bin/python2.5 python(abi) = 2.5 python25 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Dependency added by me is present, but other dependencies are also here. I'm unable to provide python(abi) = 2.5 dependency, because of dumb python25 package generated by our IT department where provides tag is incorrect. How do I remove automatically added dependencies from generated RPM?

    Read the article

  • Installing PHP 5.2.17 Dependencies on Centos 5

    - by user1114330
    I have followed the wget method here hoping it was my solution: Howto install php 5.2.17 on centos 6 x86_64 However I get the following error when trying to install: # rpm -ivh php-5.2.17-1.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libaspell.so.15()(64bit) is needed by php-5.2.17-1.x86_64 libcrypto.so.6()(64bit) is needed by php-5.2.17-1.x86_64 libcurl.so.3()(64bit) is needed by php-5.2.17-1.x86_64 libpspell.so.15()(64bit) is needed by php-5.2.17-1.x86_64 libssl.so.6()(64bit) is needed by php-5.2.17-1.x86_64 php-cli = 5.2.17-1 is needed by php-5.2.17-1.x86_64 Would be awesome if someone could help. UPDATE: I have now installed an instance of CentOS 5 and am attempting to install php 5.2.17 yet again...anyone know the best way to deal with the following dependencies: libaspell.so.15()(64bit) is needed by php-5.2.17-1.x86_64 libgmp.so.3()(64bit) is needed by php-5.2.17-1.x86_64 libpspell.so.15()(64bit) is needed by php-5.2.17-1.x86_64 php-cli = 5.2.17-1 is needed by php-5.2.17-1.x86_64 php-common = 5.2.17-1 is needed by php-5.2.17-1.x86_64 Wondering what libgmp, libaspell, php-cli and php-common are and where to get the proper versions for php 5.2.17. Any help is most appreciated. Thank you!

    Read the article

  • Recent ImageMagick on CentOS 6.3

    - by organicveggie
    I'm having a terrible time trying to get a recent version of ImageMagick installed on a CentOS 6.3 x86_64 server. First, I downloaded the RPM from the ImageMagick site and tried to install it. That failed due to missing dependencies: error: Failed dependencies: libHalf.so.4()(64bit) is needed by ImageMagick-6.8.0-4.x86_64 libIex.so.4()(64bit) is needed by ImageMagick-6.8.0-4.x86_64 libIlmImf.so.4()(64bit) is needed by ImageMagick-6.8.0-4.x86_64 libImath.so.4()(64bit) is needed by ImageMagick-6.8.0-4.x86_64 libltdl.so.3()(64bit) is needed by ImageMagick-6.8.0-4.x86_64 I have libtool-ltdl installed, but that includes libltdl.so.7, not libltdl.so.4. I have a similar problem with libHalf, libIex, libIlmImf and libImath. Typically, you can install OpenEXR to get those dependencies. Unfortunately, CentOS 6.3 includes OpenEXR 1.6.1, which includes ilmbase-devel 1.0.1. And that release of ilmbase-devel includes newer versions of those dependencies: libHalf.so.6 libIex.so.6 libIlmImf.so.6 libImath.so.6 I next tried following the instructions for installing ImageMagick from source. No luck there either. I get a build error: RPM build errors: File not found by glob: /home/sean/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ImageMagick-6.8.0-4.x86_64/usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.8.0/modules-Q16/coders/djvu.* I even re-ran configure to explicitly exclude djvu and I still get the same error. At this point, I'm pulling my hair out. What's the easiest way to get a relatively recent version of ImageMagick ( 6.7) installed on CentOS 6.3? Does someone offer RPMs with dependencies somewhere?

    Read the article

  • sensors reporting weird temperatures

    - by Felix
    lm-sensors is reporting weird temps for me: $ sensors coretemp-isa-0000 Adapter: ISA adapter Core 0: +38.0°C (high = +72.0°C, crit = +100.0°C) coretemp-isa-0001 Adapter: ISA adapter Core 1: +35.0°C (high = +72.0°C, crit = +100.0°C) coretemp-isa-0002 Adapter: ISA adapter Core 2: +32.0°C (high = +72.0°C, crit = +100.0°C) coretemp-isa-0003 Adapter: ISA adapter Core 3: +42.0°C (high = +72.0°C, crit = +100.0°C) w83627dhg-isa-0290 Adapter: ISA adapter Vcore: +1.10 V (min = +0.00 V, max = +1.74 V) in1: +1.62 V (min = +0.06 V, max = +0.17 V) ALARM AVCC: +3.34 V (min = +2.98 V, max = +3.63 V) VCC: +3.34 V (min = +2.98 V, max = +3.63 V) in4: +1.83 V (min = +1.30 V, max = +1.15 V) ALARM in5: +1.26 V (min = +0.83 V, max = +1.03 V) ALARM in6: +0.11 V (min = +1.22 V, max = +0.56 V) ALARM 3VSB: +3.30 V (min = +2.98 V, max = +3.63 V) Vbat: +3.18 V (min = +2.70 V, max = +3.30 V) fan1: 0 RPM (min = 0 RPM, div = 128) ALARM fan2: 1117 RPM (min = 860 RPM, div = 8) fan3: 0 RPM (min = 10546 RPM, div = 128) ALARM fan4: 0 RPM (min = 10546 RPM, div = 128) ALARM fan5: 0 RPM (min = 10546 RPM, div = 128) ALARM temp1: +88.0°C (high = +20.0°C, hyst = +4.0°C) ALARM sensor = diode temp2: +25.0°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) sensor = diode temp3: +121.5°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C) ALARM sensor = thermistor cpu0_vid: +2.050 V Please note temp3. How can I know what temp3 is, and why it is so high? The system is really stable (which I guess it wouldn't be at those temps). Also, note the really decent core temps, which suggest a healthy system as well. My guess is that the readout is wrong. On another computer it reported temperatures below 0 degrees centigrade, which was not possible, considering the environment temperature of ~22-24. Is this some known bug/issue? Should I try some Windows programs (like CPU-Z) and see they give similar results?

    Read the article

  • Warning messages while build Apache server

    - by GoinOff
    I am building Apache server 2.4.6 from source and am not sure about a few warning messages I received during the rpm build process. The build completes OK and everything seems fine..BTW, this is on CentOS 5.5... During the make process: /home/johnm/dev/project1/install/linux/BUILD/httpd-2.4.6/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode=install install mod_authn_file.la /home/johnm/dev/project1/install/linux/tmp/usr/local/apache2/modules/ libtool: install: warning: remember to run `libtool --finish /usr/local/apache2/modules' What is this warning message about?? remember to run libtool --finish ?? Also, I see this: libtool: install: warning: `/home/johnm/dev/project1/install/linux/BUILD/httpd-2.4.6/srclib/apr-util/libaprutil-1.la' has not been installed in `/usr/local/apache2/lib' I am building Apache in a temp directory but libtools seems to be looking in the wrong place (/usr/local/apache2/lib instead of /home/johnm/dev/project1/install/linux/tmp/usr/local/apache2/lib). This seems like something I can blow off?? In my specfile I set DESTDIR to /home/johnm/dev/project1/install/linux/tmp where the install files are placed: %install export DESTDIR=%{buildroot} make install Both messages appear numerous times during the make process. When I install the rpm on the system, everything appears to work without problems..Thinking I can ignore these messages??? or am I missing something important??

    Read the article

  • Can't find gnutls ibrary when executing rpmbuild under non-root

    - by Rilindo
    I am trying to build ntgs from the latest source, using the .spec from rpmforge - as non-root via rpmbuild. During the compile, it fails at this step: checking for GNUTLS... no configure: error: ntfsprogs crypto code requires the gnutls library. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.78913 (%build) However, I can compile it successfully outside of rpmbuild. So it sounds like it just the matter of library being seen during the build. However, I can confirm that rpmbuild can see the library that gnutls resides: [foo@bar ~]$ rpmbuild -E '%{_libdir}' rpmbuild/SPECS/ntfsprogs.spec /usr/lib Library location: [foo@bar ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs-2012.1.15]$ /sbin/ldconfig -p | grep -i gnutls libgnutls.so.13 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libgnutls.so.13 libgnutls.so (libc6) => /usr/lib/libgnutls.so libgnutls-openssl.so.13 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libgnutls-openssl.so.13 libgnutls-openssl.so (libc6) => /usr/lib/libgnutls-openssl.so libgnutls-extra.so.13 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libgnutls-extra.so.13 libgnutls-extra.so (libc6) => /usr/lib/libgnutls-extra.so What would cause the problem of the library not being seen when you build a RPM? EDIT: Oh yeah, I am running Centos 5.5.

    Read the article

  • Changing the name of a binary packaged application and its evoking command

    - by jerkstore
    I have taken the source code of a large project, App A, and made many modifications to it to produce my version, App B. Both App A and App B compile cleanly on Debian and Red Hat and now I would like to build binary packages for both platforms. The last modification I need to make is ensuring App B can be installed alongside App A without any interference. I should be able to evoke both application-a and application-b in the terminal and have both be listed as separate software in whatever desktop environment is present. The projects have a debian/ folder (containing rules, control, etc.) and an rpm/ folder containing a SPEC file. Currently, building and installing the .rpm and .deb packages works except that App B is recognized as App A and therefore does not meet the aforementioned requirements. ldd shows the programs have the same exact dependencies and I am not able to pursue static linking of libraries. What modifications do I need to make to my project to achieve the desired outcome? Please be specific as I do not have much experience with the packaging process.

    Read the article

  • rpmbuild generates RPM in which subdirectory

    - by Adil
    rpmbuild generates RPM under which directory? I checked the RPMS directory:- [root@tom adil]# ls /usr/src/redhat/ BUILD RPMS SOURCES SPECS SRPMS [root@tom adil]# ls /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/ athlon i386 i486 i586 i686 noarch [root@tom adil]# How to decide rpmbuild outputs in which of the above sub-directories? Is it controlled by spec file? What is the default option? I thought uname -p but its not the case probable uname -i is used. Linked to my last question http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2565282/difference-between-machine-hardware-and-hardware-platform

    Read the article

  • Problem with running open office from the command line

    - by Devin Dixon
    Yesterday I installed OpenOffice on my Linux server. But when I go to run it through the command line, it says command cannot be found. I've also tried other things like OOWriter, etc. Has anyone had this problem? Installation process went like below: root@aserver [OOO330_m20_native_packed-1_en-US.9567/RPMS]# rpm -i *.rpm package openoffice.org-ure-1.7.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-core01-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-en-US-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-core02-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-core03-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-core04-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-core05-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-core06-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-core07-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-en-US-base-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-en-US-calc-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-en-US-draw-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-en-US-help-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-en-US-impress-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-en-US-math-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-en-US-res-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-en-US-writer-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-base-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-calc-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-draw-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-images-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package openoffice.org3-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-impress-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-math-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-writer-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package jre-1.6.0_22-fcs.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-binfilter-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-en-US-binfilter-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-gnome-integration-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-graphicfilter-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-javafilter-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-kde-integration-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-onlineupdate-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-ooofonts-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-oooimprovement-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-ooolinguistic-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-pyuno-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-testtool-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-xsltfilter-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package openoffice.org3-base-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package openoffice.org3-calc-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package openoffice.org3-dict-en-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package openoffice.org3-dict-es-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package openoffice.org3-dict-fr-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package openoffice.org3-draw-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package openoffice.org3-en-US-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package openoffice.org3-impress-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package openoffice.org3-math-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package openoffice.org3-writer-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed root@aserver [OOO330_m20_native_p acked-1_en-US.9567/RPMS]# soffice bash: soffice: command not found

    Read the article

  • OpenSSL 0.9.8k or higher on CentOS 5?

    - by davr
    I need to upgrade OpenSSL on my CentOS server to 0.9.8k or higher, however the latest version in the official CentOS repositories is 0.9.8e, much too old. Is there a 3rd party repository I can use that has newer versions of OpenSSL libraries? If not, can someone provide a quick walkthrough of compiling a newer version of OpenSSL for CentOS? I need it to replace the built in version, so the walkthrough would have to explain how to create a CentOS-compatible RPM.

    Read the article

  • RHEL 5 list missing critical patches/packages

    - by Vinnie Biros
    Im trying to figure out if there is an easy way to identify the missing critical patches/packages on my RHEL5 boxes. This is for audit purposes and was trying to figure out if there was an RPM command or something of the sort that would accomplish this easily. I know with my Solaris 10 boxes, i can run the "smpatch analyze" command which would display this information for me. Anyone know of anything similar for RHEL5? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How to set the rpmbuild destination folder

    - by mkotechno
    I noticed rpmbuild (-bb and --buildroot options) creates the .rpm in different locations depending of what OS are you using: GNU/Linux Ubuntu <= 9.04: /usr/src/rpm/... GNU/Linux Ubuntu = 9.10: /home/rpmbuild/... GNU/Linux Fedora: /usr/src/redhat/... So how can I set manually the destination folder for all OS?

    Read the article

  • Invalid format for New Relic licence when installing on Elastic Beanstalk

    - by BenFreke
    We've created an app that is running on an Elastic Beanstalk instance, 64 bit PHP version 5.4 (so not legacy). I've used the New Relic installation instructions to install New Relic, and viewing phpinfo shows that New Relic is installed. However, I'm not getting any data in New Relic and that is because it is saying that the licence is ***invalid format*** under newrelic.licence I'm getting the licence from my New Relic account, and it is a 40 character hexadecimal string. Here is the current newrelic.config file in the .ebextensions folder I'm using, with most of the licence key commented out. packages: yum: newrelic-php5: [] rpm: newrelic: http://yum.newrelic.com/pub/newrelic/el5/x86_64/newrelic-repo-5-3.noarch.rpm commands: configure_new_relic: command: newrelic-install install env: NR_INSTALL_SILENT: true NR_INSTALL_KEY: ec9a4... Skitch of relevant phpinfo Can anyone shed some light on what's going on here? I've tried two different New Relic licence keys with the same error, I've also surrounded it with a single quote mark and tried uppercase only. And at this point I'm out of ideas on what to try. We're not AWS gurus so it could very easily be something simple like not opening a port to allow the licence to be validated?

    Read the article

  • Failed depencies: libmysqlclient.so.16 is needed

    - by user54625
    I'm trying to install something on my server that requires mysqlclient, but looking at my RPM package list I have it ("MySQL-client-5.0.91-0.glibc23"). Doing a locate on libmysqlclient gives me this: [[email protected]] ~ >> locate libmysqlclient /usr/lib64/libmysqlclient.so /usr/lib64/libmysqlclient.so.15 /usr/lib64/libmysqlclient.so.15.0.0 /usr/lib64/libmysqlclient_r.so /usr/lib64/libmysqlclient_r.so.15 /usr/lib64/libmysqlclient_r.so.15.0.0 /usr/lib64/mysql/libmysqlclient.a /usr/lib64/mysql/libmysqlclient.la /usr/lib64/mysql/libmysqlclient.so /usr/lib64/mysql/libmysqlclient_r.a /usr/lib64/mysql/libmysqlclient_r.la /usr/lib64/mysql/libmysqlclient_r.so /usr/local/cpanel/lib64/libmysqlclient.so.14 For some reason it looks like I'm missing libmysqlclient.so.16. Does anyone know why this could be? How do I go about getting it? I'm currently running CentOS 5. Thanks a lot.

    Read the article

  • Specifying a source in puppet doesn't seem to work

    - by Mr Wilde
    I have been attempting to create a manifest for installing postgres 9.1 using puppet on a Centos 5 server. I have been trying to adapt the instructions at http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/YUM_Installation in order to achieve this and when I go through a manual process, I have been able to. It would seem to me therefore that a puppet manifest containing package { 'postgresql91-server': ensure => installed, source => 'http://yum.postgresql.org/9.1/redhat/rhel-5-x86_64/pgdg-centos91-9.1-4.noarch.rpm' } however on attempting to apply this manifest I get err: /Stage[main]//Package[postgresql91-server]/ensure: change from absent to present failed: Could not find package postgresql91-server Any expert puppeteers out there able to help me?

    Read the article

  • mrepo and grouplist/groupinstall?, mrepo not working as expected with group

    - by user52874
    All, I'm trying to set up mrepo so we can have internal repositories. After quite the slog, things seem to be working as expected EXCEPT for groups. From man createrepo: EXAMPLES Here is an example of a repository with a groups file. Note that the groups file should be in the same directory as the rpm packages (i.e. /path/to/rpms/comps.xml). createrepo -g comps.xml /path/to/rpms So here's what I'm doing: wget -c http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6/x86_64/os/repodata/comps-sl6-x86_64.xml cp comps-sl6-x86_64.xml /var/mrepo/SL6-x86_64/os/Packages/comps-sl6-x86_64.xml createrepo -g comps-sl6-x86_64.xml /var/mrepo/SL6-x86_64/os/Packages/ lots of output, no apparent errors or warnings BUT.. from a client: yum grouplist Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit Setting up Group Process Error: No group data available for configured repositories Here's /etc/mrepo.conf: ### Configuration file for mrepo ### The [main] section allows to override mrepo's default settings ### The mrepo-example.conf gives an overview of all the possible settings [main] srcdir = /var/mrepo wwwdir = /var/www/mrepo confdir = /etc/mrepo.conf.d arch = x86_64 mailto = root@localhost smtp-server = localhost pxelinux = /usr/lib/syslinux/pxelinux.0 tftpdir = /tftpboot #rhnlogin = username:password ### Any other section is considered a definition for a distribution ### You can put distribution sections in /etc/mrepo.conf.d ### Examples can be found in the documentation. Here's /etc/mrepo.conf.d/sl6.mrepo: ### Scientific Linux 6 [SL6] name = Scientific Linux 6 release = 6 arch = x86_64 metadata = repomd repoview os = rsync://rsync.scientificlinux.org/scientific/$release/$arch/os/ updates = rsync://rsync.scientificlinux.org/scientific/$release/$arch/updates/ security = rsync://rsync.scientificlinux.org/scientific/$release/$arch/updates/security/ fastbugs = rsync://rsync.scientificlinux.org/scientific/$release/$arch/updates/fastbugs/

    Read the article

  • Use Alladin eToken with ThunderBird and other tool

    - by Yurij73
    I'm looking for an example on how to setup the eToken PRO Java device to work with Mozilla Thunderbird and with other Linux tool such as PAM logon. I installed distributed pkiclient-5.00.28-0.i386.RPM from the official product page eToken Pro but that tool only handles importing/exporting certificates on the device. I read a glance an old HOWTO from eToken on Linux, but I couldn't install pkcs11-lib for this device as recommended for Thunderbird use this crypto device. It seems my usb token isn't listed in system, unless lsusb show it, so that is the matter modutil -list -dbdir /etc/pki/nssdb Listing of PKCS #11 Modules NSS Internal PKCS #11 Module Blockquote slots: 2 slots attached Blockquote status: loaded Blockquote slot: NSS User Private Key and Certificate Services Blockquote token: NSS Certificate DB Blockquote CoolKey PKCS #11 Module Blockquote library name: libcoolkeypk11.so Blockquote slots: 1 slot attached Blockquote status: loaded Blockquote slot: AKS ifdh [Main Interface] 00 00 token: is my token absent? on other hand i don't know which module is convenient to Java Pro, does CoolKey does all the job well? It seems Java token is too new hardware for Linux? there is excerpt from /etc/pam_pkcs11.conf #filename of the PKCS #11 module. The default value is "default" use_pkcs11_module = coolkey; screen_savers = gnome-screensaver,xscreensaver,kscreensaver pkcs11_module coolkey { module = libcoolkeypk11.so; description = "Cool Key"`

    Read the article

  • yum trying to install el5 when I am on el6

    - by giorgio79
    When I run the following yum command I get this error: Package: git-1.7.10.1-1.el5.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge) Requires: libcurl.so.3()(64bit)" I read that this error is due to running an el5 rpmforge or having some el5 installed packages. How can I solve this problem? $ yum install git Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: centos.kiewel-online.ch * epel: fedora.kiewel-online.ch * extras: centos.kiewel-online.ch * rpmforge: mirror.de.leaseweb.net * updates: centos.kiewel-online.ch Setting up Install Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package git.x86_64 0:1.7.10.1-1.el5.rf will be installed --> Processing Dependency: perl-Git = 1.7.10.1-1.el5.rf for package: git-1.7.10.1-1.el5.rf.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: perl(Git) for package: git-1.7.10.1-1.el5.rf.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libexpat.so.0()(64bit) for package: git-1.7.10.1-1.el5.rf.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libcurl.so.3()(64bit) for package: git-1.7.10.1-1.el5.rf.x86_64 --> Running transaction check ---> Package compat-expat1.x86_64 0:1.95.8-8.el6 will be installed ---> Package git.x86_64 0:1.7.10.1-1.el5.rf will be installed --> Processing Dependency: libcurl.so.3()(64bit) for package: git-1.7.10.1-1.el5.rf.x86_64 ---> Package perl-Git.x86_64 0:1.7.10.1-1.el5.rf will be installed --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: git-1.7.10.1-1.el5.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge) Requires: libcurl.so.3()(64bit) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest

    Read the article

  • Is there a sqlite entension for PHP in RedHat Enterprise Linux 5?

    - by symcbean
    Hi, I'm trying to use some off-the-shelf PHP code in RHEL5 which requires the sqlite package (not the PDO one) but it appears this is not included in the base php5.1.6 rpm bundled with RHEL5. Unfortunately, due to circumstances beyond my control, I don't have access to the installation media or RHN access (don't ask). There doesn't appear to be such a package in the CENTOS 5 distro either (and I've read that its not in the php-common rpm there either). Any ideas of where I can get this (withuot compiling my own PHP from scratch?) TIA

    Read the article

  • Is there something like "New Relic" for Perl apps?

    - by Cninroh
    We have successfully migrated all of our PHP and Ruby apps to use New Relic RPM both for Application performance measurements and server monitoring. We are very please with results, which have enabled us to improve the overall performance of the platfrom numeral times. We still have a lot of Perl applications which we need to support for legacy purposes, but in comparison to our New Relic powred apps we are completely blind to whats happening inside the apps and in peak hours. Is there something like "New Relic" for Perl apps?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >