Search Results

Search found 22383 results on 896 pages for 'package private'.

Page 2/896 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • always purge on remove in package

    - by Jeroen
    Is there a way I can set my package to always automatically include a --purge whenever a user does a regular apt-get remove mypackage ? The reason is that I have some config files in /etc that should really be removed when the binaries are removed, otherwise it can lead to weird behavior. However I still want to treat them as conf files, i.e. make sure apt does not just wipe them on every upgrade of the package. But they should be removed when the package is uninstalled. Currently I am manually deleting the /etc conf files in my postrm script. However I just found out that this has a unfortunate side effect: if the user uninstalls and then later re-installs the package, the conf files won't be reinstalled, because apt thinks that they are still there. So is there a way I can manually trigger a full 'purge' in my postrm, such that apt knows that the conf files are gone?

    Read the article

  • Cannot use apt-get anymore because of one specific package

    - by Alex K.
    No matter what type of apt-get I run (install, update, ...) I always get: dpkg: warning: files list file for package `libgdata-google1.2-1' missing, assuming package has no files currently installed. dpkg: warning: files list file for package `libntlm0' missing, assuming package has no files currently installed. (Reading database ... 354644 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace libntlm0 1.1-1 (using .../libntlm0_1.1-1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libntlm0 ... At this point apt-get hang. Does somebody know a way to fix this? Some days ago a line in source.list was removed (Google Chrome).

    Read the article

  • I can't update my system properly, "no package header" error

    - by joel
    Every time I try to run sudo apt-get update or try running updates from the GUI interface I run into the following problem or something similar: Reading package lists... Error! E: Encountered a section with no Package: header E: Problem with MergeList /var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise_restricted_binary-i386_Packages E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened. I've tried purging using sudo rm -rf <filename> where <filename> is the listed file above, and then running sudo apt-get update to fix it (as listed elsewhere in this forum) and no luck, just keep getting this message. I'm running Ubuntu 12.04 and this is getting really frustrating... I just want a system that runs smoothly and doesn't require it's hand to be held when it comes to updates. Tried the solutions posted below and am still receiving the same errors, sample output: W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise_main_binary-amd64_Packages Encountered a section with no Package: header W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise_main_binary-i386_Packages Encountered a section with no Package: header W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise_restricted_binary-i386_Packages Encountered a section with no Package: header W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise_universe_binary-i386_Packages Encountered a section with no Package: header W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise_multiverse_binary-i386_Packages Encountered a section with no Package: header W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise-updates_universe_source_Sources Encountered a section with no Package: header W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise-updates_restricted_binary-i386_Packages Encountered a section with no Package: header W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise-updates_universe_binary-i386_Packages Encountered a section with no Package: header W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise-updates_multiverse_binary-i386_Packages Encountered a section with no Package: header W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise-backports_universe_binary-i386_Packages Encountered a section with no Package: header W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise-security_main_source_Sources Encountered a section with no Package: header W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise-security_universe_binary-amd64_Packages Encountered a section with no Package: header W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise-security_main_binary-i386_Packages Encountered a section with no Package: header W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise-security_universe_binary-i386_Packages Encountered a section with no Package: header W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise_main_i18n_Translation-en%5fCA Encountered a section with no Package: header W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise-updates_main_i18n_Translation-en%5fCA Encountered a section with no Package: header W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise-updates_main_i18n_Translation-en Encountered a section with no Package: header W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise-updates_multiverse_i18n_Translation-en%5fCA Encountered a section with no Package: header W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise-updates_universe_i18n_Translation-en%5fCA Encountered a section with no Package: header W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise-backports_main_i18n_Translation-en%5fCA Encountered a section with no Package: header W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise-backports_multiverse_i18n_Translation-en%5fCA Encountered a section with no Package: header W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise-backports_universe_i18n_Translation-en%5fCA Encountered a section with no Package: header W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise-security_main_i18n_Translation-en%5fCA Encountered a section with no Package: header W: Failed to fetch gzip:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_precise-security_multiverse_i18n_Translation-en%5fCA Encountered a section with no Package: header E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.

    Read the article

  • "io: postinst-must-call-ldconfig" when creating a package

    - by egarcia
    I'm trying to create an ubuntu .deb package for the (pretty awesome) Io Language. I am not the developer of that language, so I'm not familiar with its sourcecode yet. This is my first attempt at creating a .deb file. In order to create the .deb, I'm following these instructions: http://www.webupd8.org/2010/01/how-to-create-deb-package-ubuntu-debian.html So far I've been able to create a .deb file (io_2010.06.01-1_amd64.deb) and a changes file (io_201.06.01-1_amd64.changes). I'm using lintian to check the changes file, and it reports an issue I don't know how to resolve: $ lintian -Ivi io_2010.06.01-1_amd64.changes ... (lots of messages) I: io: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libiovmall.so I: io: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libgarbagecollector.so I: io: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/libbasekit.so E: io: postinst-must-call-ldconfig usr/lib/libiovmall.so N: N: The package installs shared libraries in a directory controlled by the N: dynamic library loader. Therefore, the package must call "ldconfig" in N: its postinst script. N: N: Refer to Debian Policy Manual section 8.1.1 (ldconfig) for details. N: N: Severity: serious, Certainty: certain N: N: Removing /tmp/OYuNShEHYz ... I've read the debian manual 8.8 section. I think I understand what the problem is (I need to make sure that ldconfig is invoked "somewhere", possibly on a place called "posinst") but I don't know how to resolve it (i.e. where this "posinsts" file is and how should I change it). The current way of installing Io in Ubuntu is basically running sudo make install and then sudo ldconfig. Maybe the makefile should be modified so ldconfig is called from it? I don't know. Thanks a lot.

    Read the article

  • How to create a deb package that installs a series of files

    - by fossfreedom
    I would like to create a brand new deb package to install series of files. If at all possible, I would like to untar the folder containing these files as part of the installation into a known folder location. Failing that, some knowledge how to package the source folders and files would be very useful. Question is - is this possible and if so - how? Lets give an example: ~/mypluginfolder/ contains the files x, y, a subfolder called abc and inside that another file called z. I want to tar this folder: tar -cvf myfiles.tar ~/mypluginfolder I presume my debian package would look like myfiles.tar.gz myfiles+ppafoss_0.1-1/ myfiles.tar DEBIAN changelog, compat, control, install, rules source Is it possible to somehow untar myfiles.tar to a known folder location for example /usr/share/rhythmbox/plugins/ Thus the final result would be: /usr/share/rhythmbox/plugins/mypluginfolder /usr/share/rhythmbox/plugins/mypluginfolder\x /usr/share/rhythmbox/plugins/mypluginfolder\y /usr/share/rhythmbox/plugins/mypluginfolder\abc\z If - presuming launchpad needs source, advice is sought as to where I should drop the source folders and files into the deb package structure. This will eventually will become a series of individual launchpad PPA packages. What I prefer (but may not be able to achieve...) is to keep my packaging to a minimum - create a series of packages from a template and adjust the bare minimum (changelog etc + the tar file/file & folder structure).

    Read the article

  • Cannot install any software from the Software Center due to ttf-mscorefonts-installer package error

    - by Dei
    When I try to install any software from ubuntu software center it comes with error: An unhandled error occured There seems to be a programming error in aptdaemon. This is the software that allows you to install/remove software and to perform other package management related tasks. details Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/aptdaemon/worker.py", line 961, in simulate trans.unauthenticated = self._simulate_helper(trans) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/aptdaemon/worker.py", line 1085, in _simulate_helper return depends, self._cache.required_download, \ File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/apt/cache.py", line 226, in required_download pm.get_archives(fetcher, self._list, self._records) SystemError: E:I wasn't able to locate file for the ttf-mscorefonts-installer package. This might mean you need to manually fix this package. Please help me!

    Read the article

  • How to upgrade a particular package dependencies only?

    - by zerkms
    Let's say I have a package A which has Depends: B (>= 1.0.0) in its control file. The B was installed as an A dependency some time ago with 1.0.0 version. Now B was updated in the repository to the 1.0.42 version and I'd like to upgrade it. What I don't like to do: apt-get install B since it will mark B as "manually installed" (not sure how to name it correctly) package and it won't be removed with autoremove if I decide to stop using A ever. So is there an analogue of apt-get upgrade that only upgrades a particular package and its dependencies (probably recursive, it doesn't matter in my case since B doesn't depend on anything else) only?

    Read the article

  • How to remove package in bad state, software center freezes, no synaptic

    - by GothicMonster
    When 'Update Manager' starts running, it tells me that I need to do a 'Partial Upgrade', when I start doing the upgrade, it tells me "Remove package in bad state The package 'linux-headers-3.0.0-19' is in an inconsistent state and needs to be reinstalled, but no archive can be found for it. Do you want to remove this package now to continue?" When I click 'Yes' the program just closes. I have tried to go into the software center and reinstall the 'linux-headers-3.0.0-19' ubuntu software center just freezes. Right now I cannot run 'Synaptic', or remove any software. Please help!

    Read the article

  • State of Texas delivers Private Cloud Services powered by Oracle Technology

    - by Anand Akela
    State of Texas moved to private cloud infrastructure and delivering Infrastructure as a Service , Database as a Service and other Platform as a Service offerings to their 28 state agencies. Todd Kimbriel, Director of eGovernment Division at State of Texas attended Oracle Open World and talked with Oracle's John Foley about their private cloud services offering. Later, Todd participated in the keynote panel of Database as a Service Online Forum> along with Carl Olofson,IDC analyst , Juan Loaiza,SVP Oracle and couple of other Oracle customers. He discussed the IT challenges of  government organizations like state of Texas and the benefits of transitioning to Private cloud including database as a service .

    Read the article

  • Package system broken - E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

    - by delha
    After installing some packages and libraries I have an error on Package Manager, I can't run any update because it says: "The package system is broken If you are using third party repositories then disable them, since they are a common source of problems. Now run the following command in a terminal: apt-get install -f " I've tried to do what it says and it returns me: jara@jara-Aspire-5738:~$ sudo apt-get install -f Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required: libcaca-dev libopencv2.3-bin nite-dev python-bluez ps-engine libslang2-dev python-sphinx ros-electric-geometry-tutorials ros-electric-geometry-visualization python-matplotlib libzzip-dev ros-electric-orocos-kinematics-dynamics ros-electric-physics-ode libbluetooth-dev libaudiofile-dev libassimp2 libnetpbm10-dev ros-electric-laser-pipeline python-epydoc ros-electric-geometry-experimental libasound2-dev evtest python-matplotlib-data libyaml-dev ros-electric-bullet ros-electric-executive-smach ros-electric-documentation libgl2ps0 libncurses5-dev ros-electric-robot-model texlive-fonts-recommended python-lxml libwxgtk2.8-dev daemontools libxxf86vm-dev libqhull-dev libavahi-client-dev ros-electric-geometry libgl2ps-dev libcurl4-openssl-dev assimp-dev libusb-1.0-0-dev libopencv2.3 ros-electric-diagnostics-monitors libsdl1.2-dev libjs-underscore libsdl-image1.2 tipa libusb-dev libtinfo-dev python-tz python-sip libfltk1.1 libesd0 libfreeimage-dev ros-electric-visualization x11proto-xf86vidmode-dev python-docutils libvtk5.6 ros-electric-assimp x11proto-scrnsaver-dev libnetcdf-dev libidn11-dev libeigen3-dev joystick libhdf5-serial-1.8.4 ros-electric-joystick-drivers texlive-fonts-recommended-doc esound-common libesd0-dev tcl8.5-dev ros-electric-multimaster-experimental ros-electric-rx libaudio-dev ros-electric-ros-tutorials libwxbase2.8-dev ros-electric-visualization-common python-sip-dev ros-electric-visualization-tutorials libfltk1.1-dev libpulse-dev libnetpbm10 python-markupsafe openni-dev tk8.5-dev wx2.8-headers freeglut3-dev libavahi-common-dev python-roman python-jinja2 ros-electric-robot-model-visualization libxss-dev libqhull5 libaa1-dev ros-electric-eigen freeglut3 ros-electric-executive-smach-visualization ros-electric-common-tutorials ros-electric-robot-model-tutorials libnetcdf6 libjs-sphinxdoc python-pyparsing libaudiofile0 Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. The following extra packages will be installed: libcv-dev The following NEW packages will be installed libcv-dev 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 4 not upgraded. 2 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0 B/3,114 kB of archives. After this operation, 11.1 MB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y (Reading database ... 261801 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libcv-dev (from .../libcv-dev_2.1.0-7build1_amd64.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libcv-dev_2.1.0-7build1_amd64.deb (-- unpack): trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/opencv_haartraining', which is also in package libopencv2.3-bin 2.3.1+svn6514+branch23-12~oneiric dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libcv-dev_2.1.0-7build1_amd64.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I've tried everything people recommend on internet like: sudo apt-get clean sudo apt-get autoremove sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get upgrade sudo apt-get -f install Also I've tried to install the synaptic manager but it doesn't let me install anything.. As you can see nothing works so I'm desperate! I'm using ubuntu 11.10, 64 bits Thanks!!

    Read the article

  • Broken package system relating to libc6-dev 10.2 and 10.3 dependencies

    - by Howard Warner
    I have a broken package system error when using Update Manager. The error given in the details section is: libc6-dev: Depends: libc6 (= 2.15-0ubuntu10.2) but 2.15-0ubuntu10.3 is installed Depends: libc-dev-bin (= 2.15-0ubuntu10.2) but 2.15-0ubuntu10.3 is installed I have tried fixes related to other package system errors listed such as sudo apt-get update followed by sudo apt-get -f install, but get the same error.

    Read the article

  • Failing package manager?

    - by ad3l1n3
    I am trying to download kcachegrind after a reinstallation of my OS. But I keep getting "dependency" failures. I have tried going through the Ubuntu software manager (which worked perfectly before...) and Synaptic. With synaptic, I got specific package failures and when I searched for the packages I got more package dependencies. After the 5th time of this I gave up because there must be something else going on. Please help?

    Read the article

  • Package manager doesn't work anymore

    - by LukaD
    I'm using ubuntu 10.10 and recently my package manager has stopped working because of some problems with dependencies or something. I can't upgrade, install or uninstall anything at all. This is a huge problem. I couldn't find a solution to this with google so I'm asking here for help. This is what apt-get -f install outputs LANG=en_US.UTF-8 sudo apt-get install -f Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following package was automatically installed and is no longer required: firefox-4.0-core Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 0B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up openjdk-6-jre-headless (6b20-1.9.5-0ubuntu1) ... update-alternatives: error: alternative path /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/jre/bin/java doesn't exist. dpkg: error processing openjdk-6-jre-headless (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 Errors were encountered while processing: openjdk-6-jre-headless E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

    Read the article

  • Problem with running open office from the command line

    - by Devin Dixon
    Yesterday I installed OpenOffice on my Linux server. But when I go to run it through the command line, it says command cannot be found. I've also tried other things like OOWriter, etc. Has anyone had this problem? Installation process went like below: root@aserver [OOO330_m20_native_packed-1_en-US.9567/RPMS]# rpm -i *.rpm package openoffice.org-ure-1.7.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-core01-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-en-US-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-core02-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-core03-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-core04-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-core05-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-core06-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-core07-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-en-US-base-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-en-US-calc-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-en-US-draw-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-en-US-help-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-en-US-impress-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-en-US-math-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-en-US-res-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-en-US-writer-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-base-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-calc-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-draw-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-images-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package openoffice.org3-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-impress-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-math-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-writer-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package jre-1.6.0_22-fcs.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-binfilter-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-en-US-binfilter-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-gnome-integration-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-graphicfilter-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-javafilter-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-kde-integration-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-onlineupdate-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-ooofonts-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-oooimprovement-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-ooolinguistic-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-pyuno-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-testtool-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package ooobasis3.3-xsltfilter-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package openoffice.org3-base-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package openoffice.org3-calc-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package openoffice.org3-dict-en-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package openoffice.org3-dict-es-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package openoffice.org3-dict-fr-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package openoffice.org3-draw-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package openoffice.org3-en-US-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package openoffice.org3-impress-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package openoffice.org3-math-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed package openoffice.org3-writer-3.3.0-9567.i586 is already installed root@aserver [OOO330_m20_native_p acked-1_en-US.9567/RPMS]# soffice bash: soffice: command not found

    Read the article

  • Ubuntu 13.10 gives "Package 'libapache2-mod-auth-mysql' has no installation candidate" error

    - by John Crawford
    I'm trying to install my LAMP environment on Ubuntu 13.10 using my script file that can be found here. That script worked for Ubuntu 12.04, Ubuntu 13.04 but when I try it on Ubuntu 13.10 it gives the following error: E: Package 'libapache2-mod-auth-mysql' has no installation candidate Any idea on how to fix this? Note, I do want this package to be installed. EDIT: I've found out now that the reason this could not be installed was because it needed the following two packages that were missing: libmysqlclient16 and apache2.2-common. Do I just need to install these packages or were they removed for a reason?

    Read the article

  • Package System Broken AMD FGLRX Unmet Dependencies

    - by fleamour
    I uninstalled propriety ATI driver to check if it would fix wrong Plymouth resolution. It did. But now I cannot reinstall either propriety drivers listed. Also package system has broken with this error: The package system is broken If you are using third party repositories then disable them, since they are a common source of problems. Now run the following command in a terminal: apt-get install -f The following packages have unmet dependencies: fglrx-amdcccle: Depends: fglrx but it is not installed Depends: libqtcore4 (= 4:4.5.3) but 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 is installed Depends: libqtgui4 (= 4:4.5.3) but 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.1 is installed What should I do?

    Read the article

  • Can't remove libreoffice3.5-dict-de package

    - by Aaron Digulla
    I just installed the wrong version of LibreOffice (x86 instead of 64bit). So I tried to remove it but I get this error: > aptitude remove libreoffice3.5-dict-de Couldn't find package "libreoffice3.5-dict-de". However, the following packages contain "libreoffice3.5-dict-de" in their name: libreoffice3.5-dict-de Couldn't find package "libreoffice3.5-dict-de". However, the following packages contain "libreoffice3.5-dict-de" in their name: libreoffice3.5-dict-de No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed. 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded. Need to get 0 B of archives. After unpacking 0 B will be used. The same happens when I try to use "Software Management". What's going on? aptitude: 0.6.4-1ubuntu2 Ubuntu 11.10 oneiric

    Read the article

  • Can't print, CUPS package corrupted and hangs on re-install

    - by Little Bobby Tables
    When I upgraded to Ubuntu 10.4 (Maverick), the upgrade process got stuck on the post-installation of the CUPS package. I had to kill processes and run several forced updates before I could finally get regular updated. Ever since I can't print - The printed file gets messed up and crashes the printer. I also can't re-install CUPS, as each time the installation hangs and I have to kill it before it completes. I tried to find a workaround for this problem, but in vain. Does anyone know how to bypass this? Or at least why can the post-installation hang, and how to re-install a problematic package? Some system specs and other hints: Dell D630 laptop running Ubuntu 10.4, Gnome desktop, standard LAN network, printing to an LPD server. Everything worked fine on 9.10. Also, the printed files themselves are not corrupted. The problem does not seem to be Evince-specific, but common to all printouts.

    Read the article

  • Oracle Private Cloud Solutions

    - by user462034
    To enable organizations to have complete control and visibility over security, compliance, and service levels, Oracle also helps organizations build, deploy, and manage their own cloud environments, including integrated application, platform, and infrastructure products and solutions. Oracle’s private cloud offerings include Oracle Cloud Applications. A complete and modular set of enterprise applications, engineered from the ground up to be cloud-ready and to coexist seamlessly in mixed environments. Oracle Cloud Platform. A shared and elastically scalable platform for consolidation of existing applications and new application development and deployment. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. A complete selection of servers, storage, networking fabric, virtualization software, operating systems, and management software to support diverse public and private cloud applications. 

    Read the article

  • Package manager borked with gforge

    - by Leif Andersen
    I've been having a problem with the package manager. I seemed to have installed gforge, partially, but it keeps giving me errors whenever I install something. (Note that the thing I'm trying to install actually does get installed, but there is always an error returned). Here it is: Creating /etc/gforge/httpd.conf Creating /etc/gforge/httpd.secrets Creating /etc/gforge/local.inc Creating other includes invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/postgresql-8.4 not found. dpkg: error processing gforge-db-postgresql (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 100 Errors were encountered while processing: gforge-db-postgresql E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) When I try to remove it with: sudo apt-get purge gforge-common I get this: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: gforge-common* gforge-db-postgresql* 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 to remove and 9 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 5,853kB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? (Reading database ... 717305 files and directories currently installed.) Removing gforge-db-postgresql ... Replacing config file /etc/postgresql/8.4/main/pg_hba.conf with new version invoke-rc.d: unknown initscript, /etc/init.d/postgresql-8.4 not found. dpkg: error processing gforge-db-postgresql (--purge): subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 100 Removing gforge-common ... Purging configuration files for gforge-common ... Processing triggers for man-db ... Errors were encountered while processing: gforge-db-postgresql E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) And it complains until I do a: sudo apt-get install -f At which point gforge is re-installed. I'm out of ideas, does anyone else have any other ideas with what might be wrong, and more importantly, how I can fix it? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Private members when extending a class using ExtJS

    - by Protron
    I have done some research on the ExtJS forum regarding private methods and fields inside a extended class, and I couldn't find any real answer to this. And when I say an extended class I mean something like this: Ext.ux.MyExtendedClass = Ext.extend(Ext.util.Observable, { publicVar1: 'Variable visible from outside this class', constructor: function(config) { this.addEvents("fired"); this.listeners = config.listeners; }, // to show that I need to use the base class publicMethod1: function() { return 'Method which can be called form everywhere'; }, publicMethod2: function() { return this.publicMethod1() + ' and ' + this.publicVar1; } // to show how to access the members from inside another member }); The problem here is that everything is public. So, how do I add a new variable o method within the scope of MyExtendedClass that cannot be accessed from outside but can be access by the public methods?

    Read the article

  • Unable to locate package appmenu-gtk3

    - by dre
    Yesterday I upgraded my version of Ubuntu. In stead of Gnome I now have the Unity environment. I'm not sure I like Unity better, so I'll give it a probation period to see if it's any good. What I really do not like though, is the Global menu bar. After googling I found that I had to enter: sudo apt-get remove appmenu-gtk3 appmenu-gtk appmenu-qt If I do that I get the error message: E: Unable to locate package appmenu-gtk3 Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong here and explain how to fix this problem?

    Read the article

  • Install a different version of a package

    - by Michael Wiles
    I'm running lucid server and have installed tomcat. The version it installed is 6.0.24-2ubuntu1.6. Is this the version I'm tied to? Is it possible to install a more recent version? The one available from maverick is 6.0.28. Maybe I can add a source to provide my lucid install with this version? In the package manager user interface I can "force version". Is it possible to force version from command line alternative as well?

    Read the article

  • Adding Debian Sid as Package Repository?

    - by user1131467
    I am running 12.04 Precise beta (upgraded from 11.10 Oneiric) and I added the following line to my /etc/apt/source.list: deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free In order to get a newer version of a package (octave 3.6) that I needed but was not available in the precise repository. This worked fine, but now when I want to upgrade there is a large number of packages that need to get updated. I assume this is because sid has newer versions of many of the packages than precise. I've temporarily disabled the sid repository, and this works fine - however I am curious to know what would happen if I allowed all those upgrades to go through? Would it break my system? Are the structures of Ubuntu Precise and Debian Sid repositories fundamentally different somehow?

    Read the article

  • List all versions of a package

    - by askb
    Is there a equivalent of this command; yum list kernel-headers --showduplicates on Ubuntu with apt-get, apt-cache etc. The above command lists various versions of the kernel-headers rpm available on F20/RHEL or installations. Closet I can get using apt-cache showpkg, not sure if there is a better way ? $ apt-cache showpkg linux-image Package: linux-image Versions: Reverse Depends: firmware-crystalhd,linux-image systemtap,linux-image fiaif,linux-image Dependencies: Provides: Reverse Provides: linux-image-3.13.0-27-lowlatency 3.13.0-27.50 linux-image-3.13.0-27-generic 3.13.0-27.50 linux-image-3.13.0-24-lowlatency 3.13.0-24.47 linux-image-3.13.0-24-generic 3.13.0-24.47 linux-image-3.13.0-24-lowlatency 3.13.0-24.46 linux-image-3.13.0-24-generic 3.13.0-24.46 Expecting similar output: $ yum list kernel-headers --showduplicates Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit Installed Packages kernel-headers.x86_64 3.11.10-301.fc20 @fedora Available Packages kernel-headers.x86_64 3.11.10-301.fc20 fedora kernel-headers.x86_64 3.14.4-200.fc20 updates This would help me simply do a downgrade or upgrade to a specific version.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >