Search Results

Search found 22383 results on 896 pages for 'package private'.

Page 4/896 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

• Add dpkg .symbols or.shlibs to package made using checkinstall

  - by Hubert Kario

  I have created a simple package using checkinstall of the Oracle Instantclient client libraries, the package installs without problem and is seen in the system. Problem is, that checkinstall doesn't create /var/lib/dpkg/info/oracle-instantclient11.2-basic.symbols or /var/lib/dpkg/info/oracle-instantclient11.2-basic.shlibs files so when I try to create another package (with proper build scripts) that depends on oracle-instantclient11.2-basic the build fails with dpkg-shlibdeps: error: no dependency information found for \ /usr/lib/libclntsh.so.11.1 (used by \ debian/libopendbx1-oracle/usr/lib/opendbx/liboraclebackend.so.1.2.0). dh_shlibdeps: dpkg-shlibdeps \ -Tdebian/libopendbx1-oracle.substvars \ debian/libopendbx1-oracle/usr/lib/opendbx/liboraclebackend.so.1.2.0 \ returned exit code 2 make: *** [binary-arch] Error 9 Is there an easy way to automatically create a package with .symbols or .shlibs files?

  Read the article

• What's the purpose of "import package"?

  - by codethief

  As I just found out import package does not make the package's modules available through package.module. The same obviously holds true for from package import subpackage as well as from package import * What's the purpose of importing a package at all then if I can't access its submodules but only the objects defined in __init__.py? It makes sense to me that from package import * would bloat the namespace, which, however, doesn't apply in case of the other two ways! I also understand that loading all submodules might take a long time. But I don't know what these unwanted side-effects, "that should only happen when the sub-module is explicitly imported", are which the author of the previous link mentions. To me it looks like doing an import package[.subpackage] (or from package import subpackage) makes absolutely no sense if I don't exactly want to access objects provided in __init__.py. Are those unwanted side effects really that serious that the language actually has to protect the programmer from causing them? Actually, I thought that Python was a little bit more about "If the programmer wants to do it, let him do it." In my case, I really do want to import all submodules with the single statement from package import subpackage, because I need all of them! Telling Python in the init.py file which submodules I'm exactly talking about (all of them!) is quite cumbersome from my point of view. Please enlighten me. :)

  Read the article

• What are nested/unnested package in Scala 2.8?

  - by retronym

  In Scala 2.7, I could write: package com.acme.bar class Bar . package com.acme.foo class Foo { new bar.Bar } This doesn't compile in Scala 2.8 -- however this does: package com.acme package bar class Bar . package com.acme package foo class Foo { new bar.Bar } What was the motivation for this? What is the precise meaning, with regards to scope and visibility? When should I use one form over the other?

  Read the article

• Tell git which private key to use

  - by jrdioko

  ssh has the -i option to tell it which private key file to use when authenticating: -i identity_file Selects a file from which the identity (private key) for RSA or DSA authentication is read. The default is ~/.ssh/identity for protocol ver- sion 1, and ~/.ssh/id_rsa and ~/.ssh/id_dsa for protocol version 2. Iden- tity files may also be specified on a per-host basis in the configuration file. It is possible to have multiple -i options (and multiple identities specified in configuration files). Is there a similar way to tell git which private key file to use when on a system with multiple private keys in the .ssh directory?

  Read the article

• private address in traceroute results

  - by misteryes

  I use traceroute to check paths on a remote host, and I notice that there are some private IPs, like 10.230.10.1 bash-4.0# traceroute -T 132.227.62.122 traceroute to 132.227.62.122 (132.227.62.122), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 194.199.68.161 (194.199.68.161) 1.103 ms 1.107 ms 1.097 ms 2 sw-ptu.univ.run (10.230.10.1) 1.535 ms 1.625 ms 2.172 ms 3 sw-univ-gazelle.univ.run (10.10.20.1) 6.891 ms 6.937 ms 6.927 ms 4 10.10.5.6 (10.10.5.6) 1.544 ms 1.517 ms 1.518 ms why there are private addresses near the host? what are the purposes that these private addresses are used? I mean why they want to put the public IP behind private IPs? thanks!

  Read the article

• Unable to install Wordpress on Amazon's EC2 instance due to missing php-mbstring

  - by alexus

  I've created a new instance on Amazon's EC2 and I'm trying in wordpress and it's failing due to php-mbstring: # yum install wordpress Loaded plugins: amazon-id, rhui-lb Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package wordpress.noarch 0:3.9.1-1.el7 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: php-simplepie >= 1.3.1 for package: wordpress-3.9.1-1.el7.noarch --> Processing Dependency: php-mbstring for package: wordpress-3.9.1-1.el7.noarch --> Processing Dependency: php-gd for package: wordpress-3.9.1-1.el7.noarch --> Processing Dependency: php-enchant for package: wordpress-3.9.1-1.el7.noarch --> Processing Dependency: php-PHPMailer for package: wordpress-3.9.1-1.el7.noarch --> Running transaction check ---> Package php-PHPMailer.noarch 0:5.2.6-1.el7 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: php-mbstring >= 5.1.0 for package: php-PHPMailer-5.2.6-1.el7.noarch ---> Package php-gd.x86_64 0:5.4.16-21.el7 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: libpng15.so.15(PNG15_0)(64bit) for package: php-gd-5.4.16-21.el7.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libt1.so.5()(64bit) for package: php-gd-5.4.16-21.el7.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libpng15.so.15()(64bit) for package: php-gd-5.4.16-21.el7.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libXpm.so.4()(64bit) for package: php-gd-5.4.16-21.el7.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libX11.so.6()(64bit) for package: php-gd-5.4.16-21.el7.x86_64 ---> Package php-simplepie.noarch 0:1.3.1-4.el7 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: php-mbstring for package: php-simplepie-1.3.1-4.el7.noarch --> Processing Dependency: php-IDNA_Convert for package: php-simplepie-1.3.1-4.el7.noarch ---> Package wordpress.noarch 0:3.9.1-1.el7 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: php-mbstring for package: wordpress-3.9.1-1.el7.noarch --> Processing Dependency: php-enchant for package: wordpress-3.9.1-1.el7.noarch --> Running transaction check ---> Package libX11.x86_64 0:1.6.0-2.1.el7 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: libX11-common = 1.6.0-2.1.el7 for package: libX11-1.6.0-2.1.el7.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libxcb.so.1()(64bit) for package: libX11-1.6.0-2.1.el7.x86_64 ---> Package libXpm.x86_64 0:3.5.10-5.1.el7 will be installed ---> Package libpng.x86_64 2:1.5.13-5.el7 will be installed ---> Package php-IDNA_Convert.noarch 0:0.8.0-2.el7 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: php-mbstring for package: php-IDNA_Convert-0.8.0-2.el7.noarch ---> Package php-PHPMailer.noarch 0:5.2.6-1.el7 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: php-mbstring >= 5.1.0 for package: php-PHPMailer-5.2.6-1.el7.noarch ---> Package php-simplepie.noarch 0:1.3.1-4.el7 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: php-mbstring for package: php-simplepie-1.3.1-4.el7.noarch ---> Package t1lib.x86_64 0:5.1.2-14.el7 will be installed ---> Package wordpress.noarch 0:3.9.1-1.el7 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: php-mbstring for package: wordpress-3.9.1-1.el7.noarch --> Processing Dependency: php-enchant for package: wordpress-3.9.1-1.el7.noarch --> Running transaction check ---> Package libX11-common.noarch 0:1.6.0-2.1.el7 will be installed ---> Package libxcb.x86_64 0:1.9-5.el7 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: libXau.so.6()(64bit) for package: libxcb-1.9-5.el7.x86_64 ---> Package php-IDNA_Convert.noarch 0:0.8.0-2.el7 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: php-mbstring for package: php-IDNA_Convert-0.8.0-2.el7.noarch ---> Package php-PHPMailer.noarch 0:5.2.6-1.el7 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: php-mbstring >= 5.1.0 for package: php-PHPMailer-5.2.6-1.el7.noarch ---> Package php-simplepie.noarch 0:1.3.1-4.el7 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: php-mbstring for package: php-simplepie-1.3.1-4.el7.noarch ---> Package wordpress.noarch 0:3.9.1-1.el7 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: php-mbstring for package: wordpress-3.9.1-1.el7.noarch --> Processing Dependency: php-enchant for package: wordpress-3.9.1-1.el7.noarch --> Running transaction check ---> Package libXau.x86_64 0:1.0.8-2.1.el7 will be installed ---> Package php-IDNA_Convert.noarch 0:0.8.0-2.el7 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: php-mbstring for package: php-IDNA_Convert-0.8.0-2.el7.noarch ---> Package php-PHPMailer.noarch 0:5.2.6-1.el7 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: php-mbstring >= 5.1.0 for package: php-PHPMailer-5.2.6-1.el7.noarch ---> Package php-simplepie.noarch 0:1.3.1-4.el7 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: php-mbstring for package: php-simplepie-1.3.1-4.el7.noarch ---> Package wordpress.noarch 0:3.9.1-1.el7 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: php-mbstring for package: wordpress-3.9.1-1.el7.noarch --> Processing Dependency: php-enchant for package: wordpress-3.9.1-1.el7.noarch --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: php-PHPMailer-5.2.6-1.el7.noarch (epel) Requires: php-mbstring >= 5.1.0 Error: Package: php-IDNA_Convert-0.8.0-2.el7.noarch (epel) Requires: php-mbstring Error: Package: wordpress-3.9.1-1.el7.noarch (epel) Requires: php-mbstring Error: Package: php-simplepie-1.3.1-4.el7.noarch (epel) Requires: php-mbstring Error: Package: wordpress-3.9.1-1.el7.noarch (epel) Requires: php-enchant You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest # I'm using RHEL7: # cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.0 (Maipo) # yum repolist Loaded plugins: amazon-id, rhui-lb repo id repo name status epel/x86_64 Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 7 - x86_64 4,325 rhui-REGION-client-config-server-7/x86_64 Red Hat Update Infrastructure 2.0 Client Configuration Server 7 1 rhui-REGION-rhel-server-releases/7Server/x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server 7 (RPMs) 4,447 repolist: 8,773 # a while back and another environment I had to run following command first in order to get access to php-mbstring: rhn-channel --add --channel=rhel-x86_64-server-optional-6 How do you do that in Amazon EC2?:

  Read the article

• How to remove a package from the list of packages to be installed in apt-get?

  - by George

  After I tried installing vim using apt-get install, apt-get keeps giving me a segmentation fault while trying to install vim-runtime. I'm pretty sure it's just with that one specific package, and whenever I try to do apt-get install to install any other package, vim-runtime is in the list of packages that will be installed, and it's always the first package that tries to install, so I can't install any other packages. How can I remove vim-runtime from the list of packages that will be installed? It always shows up even if it is not a dependency of a package I want to install. Note: This is on an Ubuntu rootfs running on ARM.

  Read the article

• How to determine the size of a package in terminal prior to downloading?

  - by user14590

  When using apt-get install <package_name>, and there are dependencies that need to be downloaded, the terminal outputs names of additional packages and total size, and asks for confirmation before downloading. But, when dependencies are satisfied and nothing but the named package needs to be downloaded there is no size output and no confirmation. When using Synaptic, I can see the total size that new packages that will use after installation but no way to see the size that needs to be downloaded, except to go from package to package and use properties to see the compressed size. I would like to know if there is a way to see the size of a package(s) in terminal and Synaptic prior to downloading and installing it/them?

  Read the article

• What do you expect from a package manager for Emacs

  - by tarsius

  Although several hundred Emacs Lisp libraries exist GNU Emacs does not have an (internal) package manager. I guess that most users would agree that it is currently rather inconvenient to find, install and especially keep up-to-date Emacs Lisp libraries. These pages make life a bit easier Emacs Lisp List - Problem: I see dead people (links). Emacswiki - Problem: May contain traces of nuts (malicious code). These are some package managers XEmacs package manager package.el - ELPA pases install.el install-elisp.el plugin.el use-package.el jem-pkg.el epkg/elm - the one I am working. And this are some packages that provide functionality that might be useful in a package manager ell.el - Browse the Emacs Lisp List genauto.el - helps generate autoloads for your elisp packages date-calc.el - date calculation and parsing routines strptime.el - partial implementation of POSIX date and time parsing wikirel.el - Visit relevant pages on the Emacs Wiki loadhist.el, lib-requires.el, elisp-depend.el - Commands to list Emacs Lisp library dependencies. project-root.el - Define a project root and take actions based upon it So I would like to know from you what you consider important/unimportant/supplementary... in a package manager for Emacs. Some ideas Many packages (incorporate the Emacs Lisp List and other lists of libraries). Only packages that have been tested. Support for more than one package archive (so people can choose between many/tested packages). Dependency calculated based on required features only. Dependencies take particular versions into account. Only use versions that have been released upstream. Use versions from version control systems if available. Packages are categorized. Packages can be uninstalled and updated not only installed. Support creating fork of upstream version of packages. Support publishing these forks. Support choosing a fork. After installation packages are activated. Generate autoloads. Integration with Emacswiki (see wikirel.el). Users can tag, comment ... packages and share that information. Only FSF-assigned/GPL/FOSS software or don't care about license. Package manager should be integrated in Emacs. Support contacting author. Lots of metadata. Suggest alternatives before installing a particular package. Some discussions about the subject at hand emacs-devel 20080801 comp.emacs 20021121 RationalElispPackaging I am hoping for these kinds of answers Pointers to more implementations, discussions etc. Lengthy descriptions of a set of features that make up your ideal package manager. Descriptions of one particular disired/undisired feature. This has the advantage that the regular voting mechanism allows us to see what features are most welcomed. Feel free to elaborate on my ideas from above. Surprise me.

  Read the article

• Using Pragma in Oracle Package Body

  - by asalamon74

  I'd like to create an Oracle Package and two functions in it: A public function ( function_public ) and a private one ( function_private ). The public function calls the private one. I'd like to add the same pragma to the functions: WNDS, WNPS. Without the pragma I can create a code like this: CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE PRAGMA_TEST AS FUNCTION function_public(x IN VARCHAR2) RETURN VARCHAR2; END PRAGMA_TEST; CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY PRAGMA_TEST AS FUNCTION function_private(y IN VARCHAR2) RETURN VARCHAR2 IS BEGIN -- code END; FUNCTION function_public(x IN VARCHAR2) RETURN VARCHAR2 IS BEGIN -- code -- here is a call for function_private -- code END; END PRAGMA_TEST; If I'd like to add WNDS, WNPS pragma to function_public I should also add the same pragma to function_private because function_public calls function_private. It seems to me pragma can be used only in the package declaration, and not in package body, so I have to declare function_private in the package as well: CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE PRAGMA_TEST AS FUNCTION function_private(y IN VARCHAR2) RETURN VARCHAR2; PRAGMA RESTRICT_REFERENCES( function_private, WNDS, WNPS); FUNCTION function_public(x IN VARCHAR2) RETURN VARCHAR2; PRAGMA RESTRICT_REFERENCES( function_public, WNDS, WNPS); END PRAGMA_TEST; CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY PRAGMA_TEST AS FUNCTION function_private(y IN VARCHAR2) RETURN VARCHAR2 IS BEGIN -- code END; FUNCTION function_public(x IN VARCHAR2) RETURN VARCHAR2 IS BEGIN -- code -- here is a call for function_private -- code END; END PRAGMA_TEST; This solution makes my function_private public as well. Is there a solution to add pragma to a function which can be found only in the package body?

  Read the article

• CentOS 6 LEMP update - dependency error issue

  - by Latheesan Kanes

  I have setup a LEMP server following the guide Install Nginx/PHP-FPM on Fedora 20/19, CentOS/RHEL 6.5/5.10. It's been a while since I did the setup, so I wanted to grab the latest updates from REMI repository. I ran the following command: yum --enablerepo=remi,remi-php55 update I now get these dependency related errors: # yum --enablerepo=remi update Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.nl.leaseweb.net * epel: mirror.1000mbps.com * extras: mirror.nl.leaseweb.net * remi: remi.schlundtech.de * updates: centos.mirror1.spango.com Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package chkconfig.x86_64 0:1.3.49.3-2.el6 will be updated ---> Package chkconfig.x86_64 0:1.3.49.3-2.el6_4.1 will be an update ---> Package glibc.x86_64 0:2.12-1.107.el6_4.4 will be updated ---> Package glibc.x86_64 0:2.12-1.107.el6_4.5 will be an update ---> Package glibc-common.x86_64 0:2.12-1.107.el6_4.4 will be updated ---> Package glibc-common.x86_64 0:2.12-1.107.el6_4.5 will be an update ---> Package gnupg2.x86_64 0:2.0.14-4.el6 will be updated ---> Package gnupg2.x86_64 0:2.0.14-6.el6_4 will be an update ---> Package iputils.x86_64 0:20071127-17.el6_4 will be updated ---> Package iputils.x86_64 0:20071127-17.el6_4.2 will be an update ---> Package kernel.x86_64 0:2.6.32-358.23.2.el6 will be installed ---> Package kernel-firmware.noarch 0:2.6.32-358.18.1.el6 will be updated ---> Package kernel-firmware.noarch 0:2.6.32-358.23.2.el6 will be an update ---> Package libgcrypt.x86_64 0:1.4.5-9.el6_2.2 will be updated ---> Package libgcrypt.x86_64 0:1.4.5-11.el6_4 will be an update ---> Package mysql-libs.x86_64 0:5.1.69-1.el6_4 will be updated --> Processing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.16()(64bit) for package: 2:postfix-2.6.6-2.2.el6_1.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libmysqlclient.so.16(libmysqlclient_16)(64bit) for package: 2:postfix-2.6.6-2.2.el6_1.x86_64 ---> Package mysql-libs.x86_64 0:5.5.34-1.el6.remi will be an update ---> Package nginx.x86_64 0:1.4.2-1.el6.ngx will be updated ---> Package nginx.x86_64 0:1.4.3-1.el6.ngx will be an update ---> Package php-pear.noarch 1:1.9.4-20.el6.remi will be updated ---> Package php-pear.noarch 1:1.9.4-23.el6.remi will be an update ---> Package php-pecl-jsonc.x86_64 0:1.3.2-1.el6.remi.1 will be updated ---> Package php-pecl-jsonc.x86_64 0:1.3.2-2.el6.remi will be an update --> Processing Dependency: php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 for package: php-pecl-jsonc-1.3.2-2.el6.remi.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 for package: php-pecl-jsonc-1.3.2-2.el6.remi.x86_64 ---> Package php-pecl-mongo.x86_64 0:1.4.3-1.el6.remi.1 will be updated ---> Package php-pecl-mongo.x86_64 0:1.4.4-1.el6.remi will be an update --> Processing Dependency: php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 for package: php-pecl-mongo-1.4.4-1.el6.remi.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 for package: php-pecl-mongo-1.4.4-1.el6.remi.x86_64 ---> Package php-pecl-sqlite.x86_64 0:2.0.0-0.3.svn313074.el6.remi.5 will be updated ---> Package php-pecl-sqlite.x86_64 0:2.0.0-0.4.svn332053.el6.remi.5.4 will be an update --> Processing Dependency: php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 for package: php-pecl-sqlite-2.0.0-0.4.svn332053.el6.remi.5.4.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 for package: php-pecl-sqlite-2.0.0-0.4.svn332053.el6.remi.5.4.x86_64 ---> Package postgresql-libs.x86_64 0:8.4.13-1.el6_3 will be updated ---> Package postgresql-libs.x86_64 0:8.4.18-1.el6_4 will be an update ---> Package remi-release.noarch 0:6-2.el6.remi will be updated ---> Package remi-release.noarch 0:6.4-1.el6.remi will be an update ---> Package rsync.x86_64 0:3.0.6-9.el6 will be updated ---> Package rsync.x86_64 0:3.0.6-9.el6_4.1 will be an update ---> Package selinux-policy.noarch 0:3.7.19-195.el6_4.12 will be updated ---> Package selinux-policy.noarch 0:3.7.19-195.el6_4.18 will be an update ---> Package selinux-policy-targeted.noarch 0:3.7.19-195.el6_4.12 will be updated ---> Package selinux-policy-targeted.noarch 0:3.7.19-195.el6_4.18 will be an update ---> Package setup.noarch 0:2.8.14-20.el6 will be updated ---> Package setup.noarch 0:2.8.14-20.el6_4.1 will be an update ---> Package tzdata.noarch 0:2013c-2.el6 will be updated ---> Package tzdata.noarch 0:2013g-1.el6 will be an update ---> Package xinetd.x86_64 2:2.3.14-38.el6 will be updated ---> Package xinetd.x86_64 2:2.3.14-39.el6_4 will be an update --> Running transaction check ---> Package compat-mysql51.x86_64 0:5.1.54-1.el6.remi will be installed ---> Package php-pecl-jsonc.x86_64 0:1.3.2-2.el6.remi will be an update --> Processing Dependency: php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 for package: php-pecl-jsonc-1.3.2-2.el6.remi.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 for package: php-pecl-jsonc-1.3.2-2.el6.remi.x86_64 ---> Package php-pecl-mongo.x86_64 0:1.4.4-1.el6.remi will be an update --> Processing Dependency: php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 for package: php-pecl-mongo-1.4.4-1.el6.remi.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 for package: php-pecl-mongo-1.4.4-1.el6.remi.x86_64 ---> Package php-pecl-sqlite.x86_64 0:2.0.0-0.4.svn332053.el6.remi.5.4 will be an update --> Processing Dependency: php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 for package: php-pecl-sqlite-2.0.0-0.4.svn332053.el6.remi.5.4.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 for package: php-pecl-sqlite-2.0.0-0.4.svn332053.el6.remi.5.4.x86_64 --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: php-pecl-jsonc-1.3.2-2.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) Requires: php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 Installed: php-common-5.5.4-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (@remi-test) php(zend-abi) = 20121212-64 Available: php-common-5.3.3-22.el6.x86_64 (base) php(zend-abi) = 20090626 Available: php-common-5.3.3-23.el6_4.x86_64 (updates) php(zend-abi) = 20090626 Available: php-common-5.4.21-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 Available: php-common-5.4.21-2.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 Error: Package: php-pecl-mongo-1.4.4-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) Requires: php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 Installed: php-common-5.5.4-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (@remi-test) php(zend-abi) = 20121212-64 Available: php-common-5.3.3-22.el6.x86_64 (base) php(zend-abi) = 20090626 Available: php-common-5.3.3-23.el6_4.x86_64 (updates) php(zend-abi) = 20090626 Available: php-common-5.4.21-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 Available: php-common-5.4.21-2.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 Error: Package: php-pecl-jsonc-1.3.2-2.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) Requires: php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 Installed: php-common-5.5.4-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (@remi-test) php(api) = 20121113-64 Available: php-common-5.3.3-22.el6.x86_64 (base) php(api) = 20090626 Available: php-common-5.3.3-23.el6_4.x86_64 (updates) php(api) = 20090626 Available: php-common-5.4.21-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 Available: php-common-5.4.21-2.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 Error: Package: php-pecl-sqlite-2.0.0-0.4.svn332053.el6.remi.5.4.x86_64 (remi) Requires: php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 Installed: php-common-5.5.4-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (@remi-test) php(zend-abi) = 20121212-64 Available: php-common-5.3.3-22.el6.x86_64 (base) php(zend-abi) = 20090626 Available: php-common-5.3.3-23.el6_4.x86_64 (updates) php(zend-abi) = 20090626 Available: php-common-5.4.21-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 Available: php-common-5.4.21-2.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) php(zend-abi) = 20100525-x86-64 Error: Package: php-pecl-mongo-1.4.4-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) Requires: php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 Installed: php-common-5.5.4-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (@remi-test) php(api) = 20121113-64 Available: php-common-5.3.3-22.el6.x86_64 (base) php(api) = 20090626 Available: php-common-5.3.3-23.el6_4.x86_64 (updates) php(api) = 20090626 Available: php-common-5.4.21-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 Available: php-common-5.4.21-2.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 Error: Package: php-pecl-sqlite-2.0.0-0.4.svn332053.el6.remi.5.4.x86_64 (remi) Requires: php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 Installed: php-common-5.5.4-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (@remi-test) php(api) = 20121113-64 Available: php-common-5.3.3-22.el6.x86_64 (base) php(api) = 20090626 Available: php-common-5.3.3-23.el6_4.x86_64 (updates) php(api) = 20090626 Available: php-common-5.4.21-1.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 Available: php-common-5.4.21-2.el6.remi.x86_64 (remi) php(api) = 20100412-x86-64 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest Any idea how to solve these errors? Am I missing a package? or is this a bug?

  Read the article

• Server Names Inside Private Network

  - by thyandrecardoso

  Our office has a private network, where any requests on a (pre-determined) public IP are forwarded to a private IP inside said network. On that private IP, we've got a server running several services, including HTTP servers, and SCM systems. We only control our private network, having no control on the public IP configuration. We bought a domain name, and pointed it to that public IP, so people can access our services from the outside. But, when inside the office, people can't use that DNS name, because the server and any other hosts inside the network share the same public IP! For desktops, inside the office network, dealing with names is really easy: one entry on the hosts file and we're done. However, for laptops, that keep going in and out, and need to access services inside the office, the naming is really annoying. I don't know the "standard" process for dealing with these kind of situations. I've considered installing BIND in the office, and make people configure their wireless and wired connections to use that DNS server. What is the correct approach in this situation? If using BIND (or any other DNS server) is the answer, how should I configure it so that people inside the office can use it to get our custom names, and get forwarded to the ISP DNS when trying to reach the internet?

  Read the article

• How to use the correct SSH private key?

  - by Dail

  I have a private key inside /home/myuser/.ssh/privateKey I have a problem connecting to the ssh server, because i always get: Permission denied (publickey). I tried to debug the problem and i find that ssh is reading wrong file, take a look at the output: [damiano@Damiano-PC .ssh]$ ssh -v root@vps1 OpenSSH_5.8p2, OpenSSL 1.0.0g-fips 18 Jan 2012 debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config debug1: Applying options for vps1 debug1: Applying options for * debug1: Connecting to 111.111.111.111 [111.111.111.111] port 2000. debug1: Connection established. debug1: identity file /home/damiano/.ssh/id_rsa type -1 debug1: identity file /home/damiano/.ssh/id_rsa-cert type -1 debug1: identity file /home/damiano/.ssh/id_dsa type -1 debug1: identity file /home/damiano/.ssh/id_dsa-cert type -1 debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_5.8p1 Debian-7ubuntu1 debug1: match: OpenSSH_5.8p1 Debian-7ubuntu1 pat OpenSSH* debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_5.8 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received debug1: kex: server->client aes128-ctr hmac-md5 none debug1: kex: client->server aes128-ctr hmac-md5 none debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST(1024<1024<8192) sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY debug1: Server host key: RSA 74:8f:87:fe:b8:25:85:02:d4:b6:5e:03:08:d0:9f:4e debug1: Host '[111.111.111.111]:2000' is known and matches the RSA host key. debug1: Found key in /home/damiano/.ssh/known_hosts:1 debug1: ssh_rsa_verify: signature correct debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received debug1: Roaming not allowed by server debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey debug1: Next authentication method: publickey debug1: Trying private key: /home/damiano/.ssh/id_rsa debug1: Trying private key: /home/damiano/.ssh/id_dsa debug1: No more authentication methods to try. as you can see ssh is trying to read: /home/damiano/.ssh/id_rsa but i don't have this file, i named it differently. How could I tell to SSH to use the correct private key file? Thanks!

  Read the article

• Install package from debian stable unavailable in testing/unstable repositories

  - by overprescribed

  I'm currently running Debian testing and would like to install a package only available in the stable repositories. (I'm surprised I haven't come across this issue before) I could download the .deb directly and use dpkg to manually install it, but installing packages from one release into another is usually frowned upon. What's the best course of action? EDIT: Zoredache is right, I didn't realize this package has been removed from future versions of Debian as it no longer has a maintainer. It is of course, also pointed out by Zoredache, important to find out why a particular package has been removed before attempting to install it. I've altered the title slightly to reflect the actual issue.

  Read the article

• eclipse 3.4 (ganymede) package collision with type

  - by Monis Iqbal

  We have a package that ends with exception e.g. package a.b.c.exception; Our code base had no issues up till eclipse 3.3, however when we shifted to eclipse 3.4, it started giving errors related to this package: "The package a.b.c.exception collides with a type" When I refactor the package name to a.b.c.exceptions, there are no issues. Is this due to a bug in eclipse 3.4 or is there some setting to rectify this behavior?

  Read the article

• IPv4 private address assignment

  - by helloworld922

  I'm working on a private network which uses static IPv4 addresses as well as DHCP addressing for the physical LAN network. At a previous company I worked at they would assign static addresses in the 10.*.*.* space and all DHCP/LAN addresses were assigned in the 192.168.*.* space. Both of these address spaces are defined in the IPv4 private address space and there were never any internal conflicts. From personal experience at home, school, at work, and pretty much any other machine I've dealt with extensively (Windows and a few Linux distros), the DHCP server would always by default choose an address from the 192.168.*.* address space. Now my question is can I rely on this behavior? Do DHCP servers always by default assign from the 192.168.*.* pool (or any pool other than the 10.*.*.* pool), leaving the 10.*.*.* pool free for private static addressing? If not, under what conditions might a DHCP server choose an address in the 10.*.*.* address space?

  Read the article

• Python: import the containing package

  - by guy

  In a module residing inside a package, i have the need to use a function defined within the __init__.py of that package. how can i import the package within the module that resides within the package, so i can use that function? Importing __init__ inside the module will not import the package, but instead a module named __init__, leading to two copies of things with different names... Is there a pythonic way to do this?

  Read the article

• Install i486 .package onto x64 CentOS

  - by medoix

  I am trying to install a ".package" file with Autopackage onto my x64 CentOS server and i receive the below statement. -sh-3.2$ bash armagetronad-dedicated-0.2.8.3.1.i486-generic-linux-gnu.package Sorry, Autopackage only supports x86 32-bit systems, or 64-bit systems with compatibility libraries installed. Please install the compatibility libraries and rerun install. However i cannot find any documentation on what 32-Bit libraries are required or even where to start... Any ideas or suggestions would be appreciated greatly.

  Read the article

• Building Debian package - pre-installation check

  - by debianuser

  I am building a custom Debian package and during the installation, I would like the package to check for available diskspace and only proceed if there is enough space. I would like this to happen during re-install as well. I tried adding bash code to do the check in preinst and prerm file(for re-installations) with exit 1 if the check fails, but the installer went ahead and copied files and I end up with a broke installation. What am I doing wrong?

  Read the article

• How to import a class from default package

  - by mykhaylo

  Hi, I am using Eclipse 3.5 and I have created a project with some package structure along with the default package. I have one class in default package - Calculations.java and I want to make the use of that class in any of the package (for instance in com.company.calc). When I try to make the use of the class which is default package, its giving me compile error. Its not able to recognise the class in default package. Where is a problem? Calculations.java - source code public class Calculations{ native public int Calculate(int contextId); native public double GetProgress(int contextId); static { System.loadLibrary("Calc"); } } I can put my class in any other package. This class has some native method which is implemented in Delphi . If I put that class in any of the folder,I will have to make the change that DLL which I want to avoid(really - I can not). Thats why I put my class in the default package.

  Read the article

• How to use a object whose copy constructor and copy assignment is private?

  - by coanor

  In reading TCPL, I got a problem, as the title refered, and then 'private' class is: class Unique_handle { private: Unique_handle& operator=(const Unique_handle &rhs); Unique_handle(const Unique_handle &rhs); public: //... }; the using code is: struct Y { //... Unique_handle obj; }; and I want to execute such operations: int main() { Y y1; Y y2 = y1; } although, these code are come from TCPL, but I still can not got the solution... Can anybody help me, appreciate.

  Read the article

• Package pinning in Debian lenny

  - by bronto

  I need your advice as I don't know if I hit a bug, or I am misunderstanding something. On a Debian Lenny, I am trying to prevent the installation of two particular packages, when they are requested as dependencies fromother packages. I am using the same syntax I successfully used in Squeeze, but with no success at all. On squeeze, the following works as expected: # cat /etc/apt/preferences.d/local-no-pike.pref Package: pike7.6-core Pin: version * Pin-Priority: -1000 If I try to install pike7.6, which depends on pike7.6-core, apt and aptitude refuse to do so. On Lenny, the only difference is that there is no support for "fragments" in /etc/apt/preferences.d, and all preferences must be in the /etc/apt/preferences file. But it's not working. E.g., if the file contains: Package: grub-common Pin: version * Pin-Priority: -1000 apt doesn't stop me from installing grub, which depends on grub-common. I used strace to see if the file is being read, and it is. I was suggested to use some Debug:: options, but they didn't help to pinpoint the problem either. I have google'd a lot with some combinations of "lenny" "prevent" "package" "installation" "pinning" and the like, but nothing nice came out. And of course I read man apt_preferences. What am I missing here?

  Read the article

• Private IP getting routed over Internet

  - by WernerCD

  We are setting up an internal program, on an internal server that uses the private 172.30.x.x subnet... when we ping the address 172.30.138.2, it routes across the internet: C:\>tracert 172.30.138.2 Tracing route to 172.30.138.2 over a maximum of 30 hops 1 6 ms 1 ms 1 ms xxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.org [192.168.28.1] 2 * * * Request timed out. 3 12 ms 13 ms 9 ms xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxx.xx.xxx.xxxxxxx.net [68.85.xx.xx] 4 15 ms 11 ms 55 ms te-7-3-ar01.salisbury.md.bad.comcast.net [68.87.xx.xx] 5 13 ms 14 ms 18 ms xe-11-0-3-0-ar04.capitolhghts.md.bad.comcast.net [68.85.xx.xx] 6 19 ms 18 ms 14 ms te-1-0-0-4-cr01.denver.co.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.xx.xx] 7 28 ms 30 ms 30 ms pos-4-12-0-0-cr01.atlanta.ga.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.xx.xx] 8 30 ms 43 ms 30 ms 68.86.xx.xx 9 30 ms 29 ms 31 ms 172.30.138.2 Trace complete. This has a number of us confused. If we had a VPN setup, it wouldn't show up as being routed across the internet. If it hit an internet server, Private IP's (such as 192.168) shouldn't get routed. What would let a private IP address get routed across servers? would the fact that it's all comcast mean that they have their routers setup wrong?

  Read the article

• Does importing of packages change visibility of classes?

  - by Roman

  I jsut learned that A class may be declared with the modifier public, in which case that class is visible to all classes everywhere. If a class has no modifier (the default, also known as package-private), it is visible only within its own package. This is a clear statement. But this information interfere with my understanding of importing of packages (which easily can be wrong). I thought that importing a package I make classes from the imported package visible to the importing class. So, how does it work? Are public classes visible to all classes everywhere under condition that the package containing the public class is imported? Or there is not such a condition? What about the package-private classes? They are invisible no mater if the containing package was imported or not? ADDED: It seems to me that I got 2 answers which are marked as good (up-voted) and which contradict eachother.

  Read the article

• Does importing of packages change visibility of classes?

  - by Roman

  I jsut learned that A class may be declared with the modifier public, in which case that class is visible to all classes everywhere. If a class has no modifier (the default, also known as package-private), it is visible only within its own package. This is a clear statement. But this information interfere with my understanding of importing of packages (which easily can be wrong). I thought that importing a package I make classes from the imported package visible to the importing class. So, how does it work? Are public classes visible to all classes everywhere under condition that the package containing the public class is imported? Or there is not such a condition? What about the package-private classes? They are invisible no mater if the containing package was imported or not? ADDED: It seems to me that I got 2 answers which are marked as good (up-voted) and which contradict eachother.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >