Search Results

Search found 7458 results on 299 pages for 'rails migrations'.

Page 2/299 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

  • Rails - how to use a plugin from github (how to install, utilize, etc)

    - by jyoseph
    I'm trying to install a couple of different plugins for my rails 3 app. I cd to '/vendor/plugins/', then type git clone the_git_src_url. I see the files in the /vendor/plugins/ directory. However when I try to use any of the tags provided by the plugin I get uninitialized constant ContentsController::HTMLToTextileParser PriceTag and html2textile are the two plugins I'm trying to use. This is what triggers the error above: <%= PriceTag.html_to_textile(@content.desc) %> I'm working in development, I've tried to restart the server. Is there something I'm missing?

    Read the article

  • How to create migration in subdirectory with Rails?

    - by Adrian Serafin
    Hi! I'm writing SaaS model application. My application database consist of two logic parts: application tables - such as user, roles... user defined tables (he can generate them from ui level) that can be different for each application instance All tables are created by rails migrations mechanism. I would like to put user defined tables in another directory: db/migrations - application tables db/migrations/custom - tables generated by user so i can do svn:ignore on db/migrations/custom, and when I do updates of my app on clients servers it would only update application tables migrations. Is there any way to achieve this in rails?

    Read the article

  • Rails Counter Cache and its implementation

    - by Ishu
    Hello All, I am trying to get hold of rails counter cache feature but not able to grasp it completely. Let's say that We have 3 models A B C A belongs to B or C depending upon a field key_type and key_id. key_type tells whether A belongs to B or C so if key_type="B" then the record belongs to B otherwise it belongs to C. In my model a.rb, I have defined following associations: belongs_to :b, :counter_cache => true, :foreign_key => "key_id" belongs_to :c, :counter_cache => true, :foreign_key => "key_id" and in b and c model files has_many :as , :conditions => {:key_type => "B"} has_many :as , :conditions => {:key_type => "C"} Both B and C Models have a column as as_count The problem is every time an object of a is created count is increased in the both the models b and c. Any help is appreciated. Initially i thought that this may work: belongs_to :b, :counter_cache => true, :foreign_key => "key_id", :conditions => {:key_type => "B"} belongs_to :c, :counter_cache => true, :foreign_key => "key_id", :conditions => {:key_type => "C"} But this does not help. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Rails add a param to the end of a search query

    - by bob
    Hello, I am trying to implement a sort on the returned results of a search with rails. Filter by: 'recent' % | 'lowest_price' % | 'highest_price' % here are my links. I would like to add a filter to the end of my search query. So for example, I submit a search and I get back results and in my url I have http://localhost:3000/junks?search=handbag&condition=&category=&main_submit=Go! I would then like the user to be able to click one of the above links and have the page come back with a new query (i have this set up in the controller like such) con_id = params[:condition] if params[:category].nil? || params[:category].empty? cat_id = params[:category] results = Junk.search params[:search], :with => { :category_id => cat_id, :condition_id => con_id } case params[:filter] when "lowest_price" @junks = results.lowest_price.paginate :page => params[:page], :per_page => 12 when "highest_price" @junks = results.highest_price.paginate :page => params[:page], :per_page => 12 else @junks = results.paginate :page => params[:page], :per_page => 12 end else I would like the user to be able to click on of the above links and append a filter param to the end of the search query so that my controller can pick it up and call the correct database queries as seen in the case statement above. I'm guessing the url will look like this http://localhost:3000/junks?search=handbag&condition=&category=&main_submit=Go!&filter="lowest_price" How can I do this? Is there a better way?

    Read the article

  • Good DB Migrations for CakePHP?

    - by Martin Westin
    Hi, I have been trying a few migration scripts for CakePHP but I ran into problems with all of the in some form or another. Please advice me on a migration option for Cake that you use live and know works. I'd like the following "features": -Support CakePHP 1.2(e.g. CakeDCs migrations will only be an option when 1.3 is stable and my app migrated to the new codebase) -Support for (or at least not halt on) Models with a different database config. -Support Models in sub-folders of app/models -Support Models in plugins -Support tables that do not conform to Cake conventions (I have a few special tables that do not have a single primary key field and need to keep them) -Plays well with automated deployment via Capistrano and Git. I do not need rails-style versioned files a git versioned schema file that is compared live to the existing schema will do. That is: I like the SchemaShell in Cake apart from it not being compatible with most of my requirements above. I have looked at and tested: CakePHP Schema Shell http://book.cakephp.org/view/734/Schema-management-and-migrations CakeDC migrations http://cakedc.com/downloads/view/cakephp_migrations_plugin YAML migrations http://github.com/georgious/cakephp-yaml-migrations-and-fixtures joelmoss migrations http://code.google.com/p/cakephp-migrations

    Read the article

  • Run Rails 3 app on a Rails 2 server/machine?

    - by chucknelson
    I'm trying to run a Rail 3 (3.0.10) app on a shared joyent smartmachine server (I don't have root access) which has Rails 2 (2.3.11) installed , and I'm not sure what to do after I freeze my Rails 3 app with bundle install --deployment. It seems like with the Rails 3 and bundler gems not being installed on the server locally, my app isn't even recognizing the local version of Rails I have frozen with my app. Has anyone gotten this to work, or have any advice? The server runs Apache, and I think I can get lighttpd installed too - but I'd rather stay with Apache if I can. Also, if it matters, Passenger is not an installed gem either...and I'm not sure I can freeze that with my app. Update 11/30/2011 12:30 PM EST Bundler is not installed on this server, either. Not sure if having that would enable the new Rails 3 "freeze" (bundle --deployment) to work or not...

    Read the article

  • subsonic.migrations and Oracle XE

    - by andrecarlucci
    Hello, Probably I'm doing something wrong but here it goes: I'm trying to create a database using subsonic.migrations in an OracleXE version 10.2.0.1.0. I have ODP v 10.2.0.2.20 installed. This is my app.config: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> <configuration> <configSections> <section name="SubSonicService" type="SubSonic.SubSonicSection, SubSonic" requirePermission="false"/> </configSections> <connectionStrings> <add name="test" connectionString="Data Source=XE; User Id=test; Password=test;"/> </connectionStrings> <SubSonicService defaultProvider="test"> <providers> <clear/> <add name="test" type="SubSonic.OracleDataProvider, SubSonic" connectionStringName="test" generatedNamespace="testdb"/> </providers> </SubSonicService> </configuration> And that's my first migration: public class Migration001_Init : Migration { public override void Up() { //Create the records table TableSchema.Table records = CreateTable("asdf"); records.AddColumn("RecordName"); } public override void Down() { DropTable("asdf"); } } When I run the sonic.exe, I get this exception: Setting ConfigPath: 'App.config' Building configuration from D:\Users\carlucci\Documents\Visual Studio 2008\Projects\Wum\Wum.Migration\App.config Adding connection to test ERROR: Trying to execute migrate Error Message: System.Data.OracleClient.OracleException: ORA-02253: especifica‡Æo de restri‡Æo nÆo permitida aqui at System.Data.OracleClient.OracleConnection.CheckError(OciErrorHandle errorHandle, Int32 rc) at System.Data.OracleClient.OracleCommand.Execute(OciStatementHandle statementHandle, CommandBehavior behavior, Boolean needRowid, OciRowidDescriptor& rowidDescriptor, ArrayList& resultParameterOrdinals) at System.Data.OracleClient.OracleCommand.ExecuteNonQueryInternal(Boolean needRowid, OciRowidDescriptor& rowidDescriptor) at System.Data.OracleClient.OracleCommand.ExecuteNonQuery() at SubSonic.OracleDataProvider.ExecuteQuery(QueryCommand qry) in D:\@SubSonic\SubSonic\SubSonic\DataProviders\OracleDataProvider.cs:line 350 at SubSonic.DataService.ExecuteQuery(QueryCommand cmd) in D:\@SubSonic\SubSonic\SubSonic\DataProviders\DataService.cs:line 544 at SubSonic.Migrations.Migrator.CreateSchemaInfo(String providerName) in D:\@SubSonic\SubSonic\SubSonic.Migrations\Migrator.cs:line 249 at SubSonic.Migrations.Migrator.GetCurrentVersion(String providerName) in D:\@SubSonic\SubSonic\SubSonic.Migrations\Migrator.cs:line 232 at SubSonic.Migrations.Migrator.Migrate(String providerName, String migrationDirectory, Nullable`1 toVersion) in D:\@SubSonic\SubSonic\SubSonic.Migrations\Migrator.cs:line 50 at SubSonic.SubCommander.Program.Migrate() in D:\@SubSonic\SubSonic\SubCommander\Program.cs:line 264 at SubSonic.SubCommander.Program.Main(String[] args) in D:\@SubSonic\SubSonic\SubCommander\Program.cs:line 90 Execution Time: 379ms What am I doing wrong? Thanks a lot for any help :) Andre Carlucci UPDATE: As pointed by Anton, the problem is the subsonic OracleSqlGenerator. It is trying to create the schema table using this sql: CREATE TABLE SubSonicSchemaInfo ( version int NOT NULL CONSTRAINT DF_SubSonicSchemaInfo_version DEFAULT (0) ) Which doesn't work on oracle. The correct sql would be: CREATE TABLE SubSonicSchemaInfo ( version int DEFAULT (0), constraint DF_SubSonicSchemaInfo_version primary key (version) ) The funny thing is that since this is the very first sql executed by subsonic migrations, NOBODY EVER TESTED it on oracle.

    Read the article

  • How to extend an 'unloadable' Rails plugin?

    - by Vitaly Kushner
    I'm trying to write a plugin that will extend InheritedResources. Specifically I want to rewrite some default helpers. And I'd like it to "just work" once installed, w/o any changes to application code. The functionality is provided in a module which needs to be included in a right place. The question is where? :) The first attempt was to do it in my plugin's init.rb: InheritedResources::Base.send :include, MyModule It works in production, but fails miserably in development since InheritedResource::Base declared as unloadable and so its code is reloaded on each request. So my module is there for the first request, and then its gone. InheritedResource::Base is 'pulled' in again by any controller that uses it: Class SomeController < InheritedResource::Base But no code is 'pulling in' my extension module since it is not referenced anywhere except init.rb which is not re-loaded on each request So right now I'm just including the module manually in every controller that needs it which sucks. I can't even include it once in ApplicationController because InheritedResources inherites from it and so it will override any changes back.

    Read the article

  • Error handling in Rails Controller for adding embedded Mongoid documents to Model

    - by Dragonfly
    I have a Item model that has embedded documents. Currently, the following comments_controller code will add a comment to the item successfully. However, if pushing the comment document onto the comments array on item fails, I will not know this. #this does work, but i do not know if the push fails def create comment = Comment.new(:text => params[:text]) @item.comments << comment render :text => comment end I would like to have something like this, but @item.comments << comment does not return true or false: #this does not work def create comment = Comment.new(:text => params[:text]) if @item.comments << comment render :text => comment else render :text => 'oh no' end end Nor does it throw an exception when the document push fails: #this does not work def create begin comment = Comment.new(:text => params[:text]) @item.comments << comment render :text => comment rescue Exception => e render :text => 'oh no' end end Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Can't store array in json field in postgresql (rails) can't cast Array to json

    - by Drew H
    This is the error I'm getting when I run db:migrate rake aborted! can't cast Array to json This is my table class CreateTrips < ActiveRecord::Migration def change create_table :trips do |t| t.json :flights t.timestamps end end end This is in my seeds.rb file flights = [{ depart_time_hour: 600, arrive_time_hour: 700, passengers: [ { user_id: 1, request: true } ] }] trip = Trip.create( { name: 'Flight', flights: flights.to_json } ) For some reason I can't do this. If I do this. trip = Trip.create( { name: 'Flight', flights: { flights: flights.to_json } } ) It works. I don't want this though because now I have to access the json array with trip.flights.flights. Not the behavior I'm wanting.

    Read the article

  • If I use Ruby Migrations, do I have to use the rest of Ruby on Rails?

    - by jkohlhepp
    I'm currently trying to come up with a database migrations strategy for my organization. This includes getting the database scripts into source control, managing versioning, managing releases to QA / Production, managing branching and merging across different release branches, etc. Ruby Migrations seems to offer solutions to a lot of those problems. But, from looking at the Ruby on Rails docs, it is unclear to me whether Ruby Migrations can be separated from the rest of the framework. I work in a primarily .NET shop, but with a lot of other technologies, and with multiple DBMS platforms (SQL Server, Oracle of various versions). Ruby is not present in our portfolio at all right now, and we have no plans to use it. If I was to use Ruby Migrations, it would be the only piece of the Ruby on Rails framework that we would want to use. Can Ruby Migrations be effectively used to manage database changes independently of the rest of the Ruby on Rails framework? Are there any docs or articles out there that describe this workflow? (Yes, I know there are other options such as Liquibase but I'm specifically trying to learn about Ruby Migrations with this question.)

    Read the article

  • Upgrading to Code Based Migrations EF 4.3.1 with Connector/Net 6.6

    - by GABMARTINEZ
    Entity Framework 4.3.1 includes a new feature called code first migrations.  We are adding support for this feature in our upcoming 6.6 release of Connector/Net.  In this walk-through we'll see the workflow of code-based migrations when you have an existing application and you would like to upgrade to this EF 4.3.1 version and use this approach, so you can keep track of the changes that you do to your database.   The first thing we need to do is add the new Entity Framework 4.3.1 package to our application. This should via the NuGet package manager.  You can read more about why EF is not part of the .NET framework here. Adding EF 4.3.1 to our existing application  Inside VS 2010 go to Tools -> Library Package Manager -> Package Manager Console, this will open the Power Shell Host Window where we can work with all the EF commands. In order to install this library to your existing application you should type Install-Package EntityFramework This will make some changes to your application. So Let's check them. In your .config file you'll see a  <configSections> which contains the version you have from EntityFramework and also was added the <entityFramework> section as shown below. This section is by default configured to use SQL Express which won't be necesary for this case. So you can comment it out or leave it empty. Also please make sure you're using the Connector/Net 6.6.x version which is the one that has this support as is shown in the previous image. At this point we face one issue; in order to be able to work with Migrations we need the __MigrationHistory table that we don't have yet since our Database was created with an older version. This table is used to keep track of the changes in our model. So we need to get it in our existing Database. Getting a Migration-History table into an existing database First thing we need to do to enable migrations in our existing application is to create our configuration class which will set up the MySqlClient Provider as our SQL Generator. So we have to add it with the following code: using System.Data.Entity.Migrations;     //add this at the top of your cs file public class Configuration : DbMigrationsConfiguration<NameOfYourDbContext>  //Make sure to use the name of your existing DBContext { public Configuration() { this.AutomaticMigrationsEnabled = false; //Set Automatic migrations to false since we'll be applying the migrations manually for this case. SetSqlGenerator("MySql.Data.MySqlClient", new MySql.Data.Entity.MySqlMigrationSqlGenerator());     }   }  This code will set up our configuration that we'll be using when executing all the migrations for our application. Once we have done this we can Build our application so we can check that everything is fine. Creating our Initial Migration Now let's add our Initial Migration. In Package Manager Console, execute "add-migration InitialCreate", you can use any other name but I like to set this as our initial create for future reference. After we run this command, some changes were done in our application: A new Migrations Folder was created. A new class migration call InitialCreate which in most of the cases should have empty Up and Down methods as long as your database is up to date with your Model. Since all your entities already exists, delete all duplicated code to create any entity which exists already in your Database if there is any. I found this easier when you don't have any pending updates to do to your database. Now we have our empty migration that will make no changes in our database and represents how are all the things at the begining of our migrations.  Finally, let's create our MigrationsHistory table. Optionally you can add SQL code to delete the edmdata table which is not needed anymore. public override void Up() { // Just make sure that you used 4.1 or later version         Sql("DROP TABLE EdmMetadata"); } From our Package Manager Console let's type: Update-database; If you like to see the operations made on each Update-database command you can use the flag -verbose after the Update-database. This will make two important changes.  It will execute the Up method in the initial migration which has no changes in the database. And second, and very important,  it will create the __MigrationHistory table necessary to keep track of your changes. And next time you make a change to your database it will compare the current model to the one stored in the Model Column of this table. Conclusion The important thing of this walk through is that we must create our initial migration before we start doing any changes to our model. This way we'll be adding the necessary __MigrationsHistory table to our existing database, so we can keep our database up to date with all the changes we do in our context model using migrations. Hope you have found this information useful. Please let us know if you have any questions or comments, also please check our forums here where we keep answering questions in general for the community.  Happy MySQL/Net Coding!

    Read the article

  • Entity Framework 4.3.1 Code based Migrations and Connector/Net 6.6

    - by GABMARTINEZ
     Code-based migrations is a new feature as part of the Connector/Net support for Entity Framework 4.3.1. In this tutorial we'll see how we can use it so we can keep track of the changes done to our database creating a new application using the code first approach. If you don't have a clear idea about how code first works we highly recommend you to check this subject before going further with this tutorial. Creating our Model and Database with Code First  From VS 2010  1. Create a new console application 2.  Add the latest Entity Framework official package using Package Manager Console (Tools Menu, then Library Package Manager -> Package Manager Console). In the Package Manager Console we have to type  Install-Package EntityFramework This will add the latest version of this library.  We will also need to make some changes to your config file. A <configSections> was added which contains the version you have from EntityFramework.  An <entityFramework> section was also added where you can set up some initialization. This section is optional and by default is generated to use SQL Express. Since we don't need it for now (we'll see more about it below) let's leave this section empty as shown below. 3. Create a new Model with a simple entity. 4. Enable Migrations to generate the our Configuration class. In the Package Manager Console we have to type  Enable-Migrations; This will make some changes in our application. It will create a new folder called Migrations where all the migrations representing the changes we do to our model.  It will also create a Configuration class that we'll be using to initialize our SQL Generator and some other values like if we want to enable Automatic Migrations.  You can see that it already has the name of our DbContext. You can also create you Configuration class manually. 5. Specify our Model Provider. We need to specify in our Class Configuration that we'll be using MySQLClient since this is not part of the generated code. Also please make sure you have added the MySql.Data and the MySql.Data.Entity references to your project. using MySql.Data.Entity;   // Add the MySQL.Data.Entity namespace public Configuration() { this.AutomaticMigrationsEnabled = false; SetSqlGenerator("MySql.Data.MySqlClient", new MySql.Data.Entity.MySqlMigrationSqlGenerator());    // This will add our MySQLClient as SQL Generator } 6. Add our Data Provider and set up our connection string <connectionStrings> <add name="PersonalContext" connectionString="server=localhost;User Id=root;database=Personal;" providerName="MySql.Data.MySqlClient" /> </connectionStrings> <system.data> <DbProviderFactories> <remove invariant="MySql.Data.MySqlClient" /> <add name="MySQL Data Provider" invariant="MySql.Data.MySqlClient" description=".Net Framework Data Provider for MySQL" type="MySql.Data.MySqlClient.MySqlClientFactory, MySql.Data, Version=6.6.2.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=c5687fc88969c44d" /> </DbProviderFactories> </system.data> * The version recommended to use of Connector/Net is 6.6.2 or earlier. At this point we can create our database and then start working with Migrations. So let's do some data access so our database get's created. You can run your application and you'll get your database Personal as specified in our config file. Add our first migration Migrations are a great resource as we can have a record for all the changes done and will generate the MySQL statements required to apply these changes to the database. Let's add a new property to our Person class public string Email { get; set; } If you try to run your application it will throw an exception saying  The model backing the 'PersonelContext' context has changed since the database was created. Consider using Code First Migrations to update the database (http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=238269). So as suggested let's add our first migration for this change. In the Package Manager Console let's type Add-Migration AddEmailColumn Now we have the corresponding class which generate the necessary operations to update our database. namespace MigrationsFromScratch.Migrations { using System.Data.Entity.Migrations; public partial class AddEmailColumn : DbMigration { public override void Up(){ AddColumn("People", "Email", c => c.String(unicode: false)); } public override void Down() { DropColumn("People", "Email"); } } } In the Package Manager Console let's type Update-Database Now you can check your database to see all changes were succesfully applied. Now let's add a second change and generate our second migration public class Person   {       [Key]       public int PersonId { get; set;}       public string Name { get; set; }       public string Address {get; set;}       public string Email { get; set; }       public List<Skill> Skills { get; set; }   }   public class Skill   {     [Key]     public int SkillId { get; set; }     public string Description { get; set; }   }   public class PersonelContext : DbContext   {     public DbSet<Person> Persons { get; set; }     public DbSet<Skill> Skills { get; set; }   } If you would like to customize any part of this code you can do that at this step. You can see there is the up method which can update your database and the down that can revert the changes done. If you customize any code you should make sure to customize in both methods. Now let's apply this change. Update-database -verbose I added the verbose flag so you can see all the SQL generated statements to be run. Downgrading changes So far we have always upgraded to the latest migration, but there may be times when you want downgrade to a specific migration. Let's say we want to return to the status we have before our last migration. We can use the -TargetMigration option to specify the migration we'd like to return. Also you can use the -verbose flag. If you like to go  back to the Initial state you can do: Update-Database -TargetMigration:$InitialDatabase  or equivalent: Update-Database -TargetMigration:0  Migrations doesn't allow by default a migration that would ocurr in a data loss. One case when you can got this message is for example in a DropColumn operation. You can override this configuration by setting AutomaticMigrationDataLossAllowed to true in the configuration class. Also you can set your Database Initializer in case you want that these Migrations can be applied automatically and you don't have to go all the way through creating a migration and updating later the changes. Let's see how. Database Initialization by Code We can specify an initialization strategy by using Database.SetInitializer (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg679461(v=vs.103)). One of the strategies that I found very useful when you are at a development stage (I mean not for production) is the MigrateDatabaseToLatestVersion. This strategy will make all the necessary migrations each time there is a change in our model that needs a database replication, this also implies that we have to enable AutomaticMigrationsEnabled flag in our Configuration class. public Configuration()         {             AutomaticMigrationsEnabled = true;             AutomaticMigrationDataLossAllowed = true;             SetSqlGenerator("MySql.Data.MySqlClient", new MySql.Data.Entity.MySqlMigrationSqlGenerator());    // This will add our MySQLClient as SQL Generator          } In the new EntityFramework section of your Config file we can set this at a context level basis.  The syntax is as follows: <contexts> <context type="Custom DbContext name, Assembly name"> <databaseInitializer type="System.Data.Entity.MigrateDatabaseToLatestVersion`2[[ Custom DbContext name, Assembly name],  [Configuration class name, Assembly name]],  EntityFramework" /> </context> </contexts> In our example this would be: The syntax is kind of odd but very convenient. This way all changes will always be applied when we do any data access in our application. There are a lot of new things to explore in EF 4.3.1 and Migrations so we'll continue writing some more posts about it. Please let us know if you have any questions or comments, also please check our forums here where we keep answering questions in general for the community.  Hope you found this information useful. Happy MySQL/.Net Coding! 

    Read the article

  • Rails Book Suggestions [closed]

    - by Solomon081
    Possible Duplicate: Is there a canonical book on Ruby on Rails? I'm looking to learn Ruby on Rails. I already have a small background in Ruby and don't really need a book that covers both, as I ordered the Pickaxe Book a couple days ago. I recently read some of Beginning Ruby on Rails-Steven Holzner, but abandoned that after seeing multiple statements on SO about how terrible the code in it was, and also the fact that it used Rails 1...Just wondering, what is the best book for an ABSOLUTE BEGINNER in Rails?

    Read the article

  • Exception with Subsonic 2.2, SQLite and Migrations

    - by Holger Amann
    Hi, I'm playing with Migrations and created a simple migration like public class Migration001 : Migration { public override void Up() { TableSchema.Table testTable = CreateTableWithKey("TestTable"); } public override void Down() { } } after executing sonic.exe migrate I'm getting the following output: Setting ConfigPath: 'App.config' Building configuration from c:\tmp\MigrationTest\MigrationTest\App.config Adding connection to SQLiteProvider Found 1 migration files Current DB Version is 0 Migrating to 001_Init (1) There was an error running migration (001_Init): SQLite error near "IDENTITY": syntax error Stack Trace: at System.RuntimeMethodHandle._InvokeMethodFast(Object target, Object[] argum ents, SignatureStruct& sig, MethodAttributes methodAttributes, RuntimeTypeHandle typeOwner) at System.RuntimeMethodHandle.InvokeMethodFast(Object target, Object[] argume nts, Signature sig, MethodAttributes methodAttributes, RuntimeTypeHandle typeOwn er) at System.Reflection.RuntimeMethodInfo.Invoke(Object obj, BindingFlags invoke Attr, Binder binder, Object[] parameters, CultureInfo culture, Boolean skipVisib ilityChecks) at System.Reflection.RuntimeMethodInfo.Invoke(Object obj, BindingFlags invoke Attr, Binder binder, Object[] parameters, CultureInfo culture) at SubSonic.CodeRunner.RunAndExecute(ICodeLanguage lang, String sourceCode, S tring methodName, Object[] parameters) in D:\@SubSonic\SubSonic\SubSonic.Migrati ons\CodeRunner.cs:line 95 at SubSonic.Migrations.Migrator.ExecuteMigrationCode(String migrationFile) in D:\@SubSonic\SubSonic\SubSonic.Migrations\Migrator.cs:line 177 at SubSonic.Migrations.Migrator.Migrate() in D:\@SubSonic\SubSonic\SubSonic.M igrations\Migrator.cs:line 141 Any hints?

    Read the article

  • How can I prevent Rails from "pluralizing" a column name?

    - by Mike
    I'm using dwilkie's foreigner plugin for rails. I have a table creation statement that looks like: create_table "agents_games", :force => true, :id => false do |t| t.references :agents, :column => :agent_id, :foreign_key => true, :null => false t.references :games, :column => :game_id, :foreign_key => true, :null => false end However, this generates the following SQL: [4;35;1mSQL (2.7ms)[0m [0mCREATE TABLE "agents_games" ("agents_id" integer NOT NULL, "games_id" integer NOT NULL) [0m I want the columns to be called agent_id and game_id - not agents_id and agent_id. How can I prevent Rails from pluralizing the columns? I tried the following in my enviornment.rb file, which didn't help: ActiveSupport::Inflector.inflections do |inflect| inflect.uncountable "agent_id", "game_id" end

    Read the article

  • Rails 3.0/3.2: Called id for nil, which would mistakenly be 4 -- if you really wanted the id of nil, use object_id

    - by Nick5a1
    I'm following the Kevin Skoglund tutorial Ruby on Rails 3 Essential Training, which was written for rails 3.0, though I am currently using 3.2. It uses the following method in the pages_controller with a before_filter to display only the pages which belong to the parent subject. The tutorial explicitly uses .find_by_id because if the result is nil it "will not return an error". However I get the "Called id for nil, which would mistakenly be 4 -- if you really wanted the id of nil, use object_id" error when trying to view a page where @subject has been set to nil. def find_subject if params[:subject_id] @subject = Subject.find_by_id(params[:subject_id]) end end The actual code that is causing the error is: def list @pages = Page.order("pages.position ASC").where(:subject_id => @subject.id) end Is this something that has changed since 3.0? If so, what would be the correct way to implement this functionality in 3.2?

    Read the article

  • Error // Usage: rails new APP_PATH [options] // when running 'rails server'

    - by madphill
    Background info: I'm using GIT to get a repository of a project with Ruby files in it. The project lives in my SITES folder under home directory on my Mac. I have Ruby: 1.8.7 I have just upgraded Rails to: 3.0.3 All I am trying to accomplish is to be able to render localhost.com:3000 in my browser of the GIT project i've already downloaded so I can work on it locally. I ran the command 'rails server' and was returned the message below:: Usage: rails new APP_PATH [options] Options: [--skip-gemfile] # Don't create a Gemfile -m, [--template=TEMPLATE] # Path to an application template (can be a filesystem path or URL) -d, [--database=DATABASE] # Preconfigure for selected database (options: mysql/oracle/postgresql/sqlite3/frontbase/ibm_db) # Default: sqlite3 -O, [--skip-active-record] # Skip Active Record files -J, [--skip-prototype] # Skip Prototype files -T, [--skip-test-unit] # Skip Test::Unit files [--dev] # Setup the application with Gemfile pointing to your Rails checkout -r, [--ruby=PATH] # Path to the Ruby binary of your choice # Default: /System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/bin/ruby -G, [--skip-git] # Skip Git ignores and keeps -b, [--builder=BUILDER] # Path to an application builder (can be a filesystem path or URL) [--edge] # Setup the application with Gemfile pointing to Rails repository Runtime options: -f, [--force] # Overwrite files that already exist -s, [--skip] # Skip files that already exist -p, [--pretend] # Run but do not make any changes -q, [--quiet] # Supress status output Rails options: -h, [--help] # Show this help message and quit -v, [--version] # Show Rails version number and quit Description: The 'rails new' command creates a new Rails application with a default directory structure and configuration at the path you specify. Example: rails new ~/Code/Ruby/weblog This generates a skeletal Rails installation in ~/Code/Ruby/weblog. See the README in the newly created application to get going.

    Read the article

  • Rails - authoritative source for your database schema?

    - by keruilin
    I have Rails app, and every once in a while, when I bring new developer onboard they exclaim that they should be able to produce the current DB schema in their dev environment by running the whole history of the migrations. I personally don't think that migrations is the authoritative source for your schema. Right now what we do is load a production copy of the DB, with the current schema, onto the dev machine. And, from there, the schema can be maintained via incremental migrations. So my question are: What is the authoritative source of your schema on a Rails project? What is now considered the best-practice way to maintain your DB schema?

    Read the article

  • Rails deployment questions

    - by Meltemi
    Getting ready to deploy a rails project on Mac OS X Server (10.5 - Leopard). Got a few questions for someone with Rails experience: where should directory containing the project go? inside the website's root folder or out? who should "own" that directory? www? root? something/someone else? hope to continue serving static pages via Apache... would like rails app to be served by mydomain/xxx/railsapp. is there a standard name people us for 'xxx'? not expecting too much traffic to begin with...just like to keep things as simple as possible.

    Read the article

  • Rails 3.0.0.beta and Facebooker: anyone else seeing the following?

    - by nafe
    Hi all, My rails server seems to break after installing the facebooker plugin. Any suggestions on fixing this would be great. I'm using rails 3.0.0.beta and facebooker. Here are the steps and the error that I'm seeing: $ rails -v Rails 3.0.0.beta $ rails break; cd break $ ./script/rails plugin install git://github.com/mmangino/facebooker.git $ vim Rakefile #and add "require 'tasks/facebooker'" $ ./script/rails server => Booting WEBrick => Rails 3.0.0.beta application starting in development on http://0.0.0.0:3000 => Call with -d to detach => Ctrl-C to shutdown server Exiting /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:456:in `load_missing_constant': uninitialized constant ActiveSupport::CoreExtensions (NameError) from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:91:in `const_missing' from /path/break/vendor/plugins/facebooker/lib/facebooker/adapters/adapter_base.rb:6 from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:167:in `require' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:167:in `require' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:537:in `new_constants_in' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:167:in `require' from /path/break/vendor/plugins/facebooker/lib/facebooker.rb:252 from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:167:in `require' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:167:in `require' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:537:in `new_constants_in' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:167:in `require' from /path/break/vendor/plugins/facebooker/rails/../init.rb:5 from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:167:in `require' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:167:in `require' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:537:in `new_constants_in' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:167:in `require' from /path/break/vendor/plugins/facebooker/rails/init.rb:1 from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.0.beta/lib/rails/plugin.rb:49 from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.0.beta/lib/rails/initializable.rb:25:in `instance_exec' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.0.beta/lib/rails/initializable.rb:25:in `run' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.0.beta/lib/rails/initializable.rb:55:in `run_initializers' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.0.beta/lib/rails/initializable.rb:54:in `each' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.0.beta/lib/rails/initializable.rb:54:in `run_initializers' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.0.beta/lib/rails/application.rb:71:in `initialize!' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.0.beta/lib/rails/application.rb:41:in `send' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/railties-3.0.0.beta/lib/rails/application.rb:41:in `method_missing' from /path/break/config/environment.rb:5 from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:167:in `require' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:167:in `require' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:537:in `new_constants_in' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-3.0.0.beta/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:167:in `require' from config.ru:3 from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rack-1.1.0/lib/rack/builder.rb:46:in `instance_eval' from /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rack-1.1.0/lib/rack/builder.rb:46:in `initialize' from config.ru:1:in `new' from config.ru:1

    Read the article

  • what is the best to use - ruby gems or ruby plugins

    - by sameera207
    Hi All, What is the best practice when creating a rails project 1 - is it good to use ruby gems 2 - or is it good to use ruby plugins (as almost all the gems has their plugin versions) and what are the strengths and weaknesses of eachoption consider we are creating the rails project with rails 2.x.x or rails 3 thanks in advance cheers, sameera

    Read the article

  • Rails version not shown post installation

    - by mgj
    Hi all, I had installed rubygems 1.8 and further on I had installed the rails 2.0.2 gem. When I tried to view the rails version installed through the command rails -v It didn't work.. I am unable to figure out why I am getting an "invalid option" on executing the command rails -v ( Please refer the below for the same). mohnish@mohnish-laptop:~/Downloads$ ruby -v ruby 1.8.7 (2010-01-10 patchlevel 249) [i486-linux] mohnish@mohnish-laptop:~/Downloads$ gem list *** LOCAL GEMS *** actionmailer (2.0.2) actionpack (2.0.2) activerecord (2.0.2) activeresource (2.0.2) activesupport (2.0.2) rails (2.0.2) rake (0.8.7) mohnish@mohnish-laptop:~/Downloads$ rails -v getopt: invalid option -- 'v' Terminating... mohnish@mohnish-laptop:~/Downloads$ Could you please help me out on this regard.. Please note I am currently not making use of the ruby version manager(rvm). Please let me know if I could get a solution once I install the rvm. Thanks for your help..

    Read the article

  • "Malformed version number string mingw32" when starting rails

    - by Freewind
    My os: windows xp, ruby: 1.8.7, rails: 2.3.5 Everything was fine, but I just installed a "gcc-4.4.0-mingw32-bin", and run gem install rdiscount, then my rails can't start. Now when I run ruby script/server, or rake gems:install, the following error will occur: rake aborted! Malformed version number string mingw32 (See full trace by running task with --trace) E:\WORKSPACE_TOPCODER\wenda_ror>ruby script/server => Booting Mongrel => Rails 2.3.5 application starting on http://0.0.0.0:3000 E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/version.rb:182:in `initialize': Malformed version number string mingw32 (ArgumentError) from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/rails/vendor_gem_source_index.rb:105:in `new' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/rails/vendor_gem_source_index.rb:105:in `version_for_dir' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/rails/vendor_gem_source_index.rb:47:in `refresh!' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/rails/vendor_gem_source_index.rb:45:in `each' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/rails/vendor_gem_source_index.rb:45:in `refresh!' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/rails/vendor_gem_source_index.rb:29:in `initialize' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/rails/gem_dependency.rb:21:in `new' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/rails/gem_dependency.rb:21:in `add_frozen_gem_path' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/initializer.rb:298:in `add_gem_load_paths' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/initializer.rb:132:in `process' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/initializer.rb:113:in `send' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rails-2.3.5/lib/initializer.rb:113:in `run' from E:/WORKSPACE_TOPCODER/wenda_ror/config/environment.rb:9 from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require' from E:/Ruby/ruby-187/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.3.5/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:156:in `require' Now I have re-installed my ruby and rails, but the same error still occurs. And I have searched in google, found no solution. It seems I have to re-install my windows xp. Somebody knows the reason? Help...

    Read the article

  • Installing Rails 3 - /usr/local/bin/rails: No such file or directory

    - by viatropos
    I just ran these two commands: sudo gem install rails --pre sudo gem install railties --pre Now when I run rails myapp, I get this: -bash: /usr/local/bin/rails: No such file or directory Here's some system info: $ ruby -v ruby 1.8.7 (2009-06-12 patchlevel 174) [i686-darwin9.7.0] $ sudo gem update --system Updating RubyGems Nothing to update I tried copy/pasting the bin/rails file into /usr/local/bin/rails, and changing permissions to sudo chmod 755 /usr/local/bin/rails, but that doesn't work. Any ideas how to get up and running?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >