Search Results

Search found 15255 results on 611 pages for 'sparse array'.

Page 2/611 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | Next Page >

Array Multiplication and Division

- by Narfanator

I came across a question that (eventually) landed me wondering about array arithmetic. I'm thinking specifically in Ruby, but I think the concepts are language independent. So, addition and subtraction are defined, in Ruby, as such: [1,6,8,3,6] + [5,6,7] == [1,6,8,3,6,5,6,7] # All the elements of the first, then all the elements of the second [1,6,8,3,6] - [5,6,7] == [1,8,3] # From the first, remove anything found in the second and array * scalar is defined: [1,2,3] * 2 == [1,2,3,1,2,3] But What, conceptually, should the following be? None of these are (as far as I can find) defined: Array x Array: [1,2,3] * [1,2,3] #=> ? Array / Scalar: [1,2,3,4,5] / 2 #=> ? Array / Scalar: [1,2,3,4,5] % 2 #=> ? Array / Array: [1,2,3,4,5] / [1,2] #=> ? Array / Array: [1,2,3,4,5] % [1,2] #=> ? I've found some mathematical descriptions of these operations for set theory, but I couldn't really follow them, and sets don't have duplicates (arrays do). Edit: Note, I do not mean vector (matrix) arithmetic, which is completely defined. Edit2: If this is the wrong stack exchange, tell me which is the right one and I'll move it. Edit 3: Add mod operators to the list. Edit 4: I figure array / scalar is derivable from array * scalar: a * b = c => a = b / c [1,2,3] * 3 = [1,2,3]+[1,2,3]+[1,2,3] = [1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3] => [1,2,3] = [1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3] / 3 Which, given that programmer's division ignore the remained and has modulus: [1,2,3,4,5] / 2 = [[1,2], [3,4]] [1,2,3,4,5] % 2 = [5] Except that these are pretty clearly non-reversible operations (not that modulus ever is), which is non-ideal. Edit: I asked a question over on Math that led me to Multisets. I think maybe extensible arrays are "multisets", but I'm not sure yet.

Read the article
Build associative array based on values of another associative array

- by macek

I'm looking for an elegant way to turn this array: Array ( [foo] => 1 [bar] => 1 [zim] => 3 [dib] => 6 [gir] => 1 [gaz] => 3 ) Into this array: Array ( [1] => Array ( foo, bar, gir ), [3] => Array ( zim, gaz ), [6] => Array ( dib ) ) Note:, there is no relationship between the keys or values. They are completely arbitrary and used as examples only. The resulting array should be an associative array grouped by the values of the input array. Thanks!

Read the article
rearrange multidimensional array on basis of value of inner array

- by I Like PHP

i have an array like this Array ( [0] => Array ( [cat_name] => Clothing [cat_id] => 1 [item_name] => shirt [item_id] => 1 [src] => 177 [sic] => 78 ) [1] => Array ( [cat_name] => Stationary [cat_id] => 3 [item_name] => note book [item_id] => 8 [src] => 50 [sic] => 10 ) [2] => Array ( [cat_name] => Stationary [cat_id] => 3 [item_name] => ball pen [item_id] => 10 [src] => 59 [sic] => 58 ) [3] => Array ( [cat_name] => Expandable [cat_id] => 4 [item_name] => vim powder [item_id] => 14 [src] => 34 [sic] => 23 ) [4] => Array ( [cat_name] => Clothing [cat_id] => 1 [item_name] => pant [item_id] => 16 [src] => 100 [sic] => 10 ) ) now what i want first it sorted by cat_id and then a create a new array having below structure Array ( [0] =>"Clothing"=>Array ( [0]=>Array ( [item_name] => shirt [item_id] => 1 [src] => 177 [sic] => 78 ) [1] => Array ( [item_name] => pant [item_id] => 16 [src] => 100 [sic] => 10 ) ) [1] => "Stationary"=>Array ( [0] => Array ( [item_name] => note book [item_id] => 8 [src] => 50 [sic] => 10 ) [1] => Array ( [item_name] => ball pen [item_id] => 10 [src] => 59 [sic] => 58 ) ) [2]=>"Expandable => Array ( [0] => Array ( [item_name] => vim powder [item_id] => 14 [src] => 34 [sic] => 23 ) ) )

Read the article
How to retrieve an array from Multidimensional Array.

- by Mike Smith

So I have a multi-dimensional array looks like this. $config = array( "First Name" => array( "user" => $_POST['firstname'], "limit" => 35, ), "Last Name" => array( "user" => $_POST['lastname'], "limit" => 40, ), ); I want use the array that's within the config array, so my approach is to use a foreach loop. foreach($config as $field => $data) { } Now I know that $data will be my array, but it seems I can't use it outside of the foreach statement because I only get half of whats already there. Using print_r you can see what it shows outside the loop: Array ( [user] => lastname [limit] => 40 ) But when inside the loop and I use print_r here is my result: Array ( [user] => firstname [limit] => 35 ) Array ( [user] => lastname [limit] => 40 ) I imagine it has to do something with it being with the foreach loop. I've tried to run a foreach on the $data array to populate another array, but that didn't work as well. Is there a way to use this outside of a foreach loop? Sorry if this a dumb question, I'm sure there is a quite a simple answer to this, but I'm just stumped, and can't think of a way to do this. Thanks.

Read the article
PHP manipulating multidimensional array values

- by Joker

I have a result set as an array from a database that looks like: array ( 0 => array ( "a" => "something" "b" => "something" "c" => "something" ) 1 => array ( "a" => "something" "b" => "something" "c" => "something" ) 2 => array ( "a" => "something" "b" => "something" "c" => "something" ) ) How would I apply a function to replace the values of an array only on the array key with b? Normally I would just rebuild a new array with a foreach loop and apply the function if the array key is b, but I'm not sure if it's the best way. I've tried taking a look at many array functions and it seemed like array_walk_recursive is something I might use, but I didn't have luck in getting it to do what I want. If I'm not describing it well enough, basically I want to be able to do as the code below does: $arr = array(); foreach ($result as $key => $value) { foreach ($value as $key2 => $value2) { $arr[$key][$key2] = ($key2 == 'b' ? $this->_my_method($value2) : $value2); } } Should I stick with that, or is there a better way?

Read the article
(PHP) Converting an array of arrays from one format into another

- by Richard Carter

Hi, I currently have an array, created from a database, an example of which looks like the following: Array( [0] => Array ( objectid => 2, name => title, value => apple ), [1] => Array ( objectid => 2, name => colour, value => red ), [2] => Array ( objectid => 3, name => title, value => pear ), [3] => Array ( objectid => 3, name => colour, value => green ) ) What I would like to do is group all the items in the array by their objectid, and convert the 'name' values into keys and 'value' values into values of an associative array....like below: Array ( [0] => Array ( objectid => 2, title => apple, colour => red ), [1] => Array ( objectid => 3, title => pear, colour => green ) ) I've tried a few things but haven't really got anywhere.. Any ideas? Thanks in advance

Read the article
Loop through multi-dimensional array and remove certain keys

- by Webkungen

Hi! I've got a nested tree structure which is based on the array below: Array ( [1] = Array ( [id] = 1 [parent] = 0 [name] = Startpage [uri] = 125 [basename] = index.php [child] = ) [23] = Array ( [id] = 23 [parent] = 0 [name] = Events [uri] = 0 [basename] = [child] = Array ( [24] = Array ( [id] = 24 [parent] = 23 [name] = Public news [uri] = 0 [basename] = [child] = Array ( [27] = Array ( [id] = 27 [parent] = 24 [name] = Add [uri] = 100 [basename] = news.public.add.php [child] = ) [28] = Array ( [id] = 28 [parent] = 24 [name] = Overview [uri] = 101 [basename] = news.public.overview.php [child] = ) ) ) [25] = Array ( [id] = 25 [parent] = 23 [name] = Private news [uri] = 0 [basename] = [child] = Array ( [29] = Array ( [id] = 29 [parent] = 25 [name] = Add [uri] = 67 [basename] = news.private.add.php [child] = ) [30] = Array ( [id] = 30 [parent] = 25 [name] = Overview [uri] = 68 [basename] = news.private.overview.php [child] = ) ) ) [26] = Array ( [id] = 26 [parent] = 23 [name] = Calendar [uri] = 0 [basename] = [child] = Array ( [31] = Array ( [id] = 31 [parent] = 26 [name] = Add [uri] = 69 [basename] = news.event.add.php [child] = ) [32] = Array ( [id] = 32 [parent] = 26 [name] = Overview [uri] = 70 [basename] = news.event.overview.php [child] = ) ) ) ) ) ) I'm looking for a function to loop (recursive?) through the array and remove some keys. I my system I can allow users to certain functions/pages and if I deny access to the whole "block" "Events", the array will look like this: Array ( [1] = Array ( [id] = 1 [parent] = 0 [name] = Startpage [uri] = 125 [basename] = index.php [child] = ) [23] = Array ( [id] = 23 [parent] = 0 [name] = Events [uri] = 0 [basename] = [child] = Array ( [24] = Array ( [id] = 24 [parent] = 23 [name] = Public news [uri] = 0 [basename] = [child] = ) [25] = Array ( [id] = 25 [parent] = 23 [name] = Private news [uri] = 0 [basename] = [child] = ) [26] = Array ( [id] = 26 [parent] = 23 [name] = Calendar [uri] = 0 [basename] = [child] = ) ) ) ) As you can see above, the whole "block" "Events" is useless right now, becuase there is no page associated with each option. So I need to find all "keys" where "basename" is null AND where child is not an array or where the array is empty and remove them. I found this function when searching the site: function searchAndDestroy(&$a, $key, $val){ foreach($a as $k = &$v){ if(is_array($v)){ $r = searchAndDestroy($v, $key, $val); if($r){ unset($a[$k]); } }elseif($key == $k && $val == $v){ return true; } } return false; } It can be used to remove a key any where in the array, but only based in one thing, for example remove all keys where "parent" equals "23". But I need to find and remove (unset) all keys where "basename" is null AND where child isn't an array or where the array is empty. Can anyone help me out and possibly tweak the function above? Thank you,

Read the article
adding up value of array and getting the average

- by sea_1987

I have an array that looks similar to this, [4] => Common_Model Object ( [id] => 4 [name] => [date_created] => [last_updated] => [user_id_updated] => [_table] => [_aliases] => Array ( [id] => 4 [name] => [date_created] => [date_updated] => [user_id_updated] => [rating] => 3 [recipe_id] => 5 ) [_nonDBAliases] => Array ( ) [_default] => Array ( ) [_related] => Array ( ) [_enums] => [_alsoDelete] => Array ( ) [_readOnly] => Array ( [0] => date_updated ) [_valArgs] => Array ( ) [_valArgsHash] => Array ( [default] => Array ( ) ) [_valAliases] => Array ( ) [_extraData] => Array ( ) [_inputs] => Array ( ) [_tableName] => jm_ratings [_tablePrefix] => [_niceDateUpdated] => 1st Jan 70 [_niceDateCreated] => 1st Jan 70 [_fetchAdminData] => [_mCache] => [_assets] => Array ( ) ) [3] => Common_Model Object ( [id] => 3 [name] => [date_created] => [last_updated] => [user_id_updated] => [_table] => [_aliases] => Array ( [id] => 3 [name] => [date_created] => [date_updated] => [user_id_updated] => [rating] => 1 [recipe_id] => 5 ) [_nonDBAliases] => Array ( ) [_default] => Array ( ) [_related] => Array ( ) [_enums] => [_alsoDelete] => Array ( ) [_readOnly] => Array ( [0] => date_updated ) [_valArgs] => Array ( ) [_valArgsHash] => Array ( [default] => Array ( ) ) [_valAliases] => Array ( ) [_extraData] => Array ( ) [_inputs] => Array ( ) [_tableName] => jm_ratings [_tablePrefix] => [_niceDateUpdated] => 1st Jan 70 [_niceDateCreated] => 1st Jan 70 [_fetchAdminData] => [_mCache] => [_assets] => Array ( ) ) [2] => Common_Model Object ( [id] => 2 [name] => [date_created] => [last_updated] => [user_id_updated] => [_table] => [_aliases] => Array ( [id] => 2 [name] => [date_created] => [date_updated] => [user_id_updated] => [rating] => 1 [recipe_id] => 5 ) [_nonDBAliases] => Array ( ) [_default] => Array ( ) [_related] => Array ( ) [_enums] => [_alsoDelete] => Array ( ) [_readOnly] => Array ( [0] => date_updated ) [_valArgs] => Array ( ) [_valArgsHash] => Array ( [default] => Array ( ) ) [_valAliases] => Array ( ) [_extraData] => Array ( ) [_inputs] => Array ( ) [_tableName] => jm_ratings [_tablePrefix] => [_niceDateUpdated] => 1st Jan 70 [_niceDateCreated] => 1st Jan 70 [_fetchAdminData] => [_mCache] => [_assets] => Array ( ) ) I wanting to add up the [rating] and get the mean average. But I dont know how do this with PHP, my attempt looks like this, <?php foreach ($rt as $rating) { $total = $rating->rating + $rating->rating } $total / count($rt); ?>

Read the article
Easiest way to remove Keys from a 2D Array?

- by dbemerlin

Hi, I have an Array that looks like this: array( 0 => array( 'key1' => 'a', 'key2' => 'b', 'key3' => 'c' ), 1 => array( 'key1' => 'c', 'key2' => 'b', 'key3' => 'a' ), ... ) I need a function to get an array containing just a (variable) number of keys, i.e. reduce_array(array('key1', 'key3')); should return: array( 0 => array( 'key1' => 'a', 'key3' => 'c' ), 1 => array( 'key1' => 'c', 'key3' => 'a' ), ... ) What is the easiest way to do this? If possible without any additional helper function like array_filter or array_map as my coworkers already complain about me using too many functions. The source array will always have the given keys so it's not required to check for existance. Bonus points if the values are unique (the keys will always be related to each other, meaning that if key1 has value a then the other key(s) will always have value b). My current solution which works but is quite clumsy (even the name is horrible but can't find a better one): function get_unique_values_from_array_by_keys(array $array, array $keys) { $result = array(); $found = array(); if (count($keys) > 0) { foreach ($array as $item) { if (in_array($item[$keys[0]], $found)) continue; array_push($found, $item[$keys[0]]); $result_item = array(); foreach ($keys as $key) { $result_item[$key] = $item[$key]; } array_push($result, $result_item); } } return $result; } Addition: PHP Version is 5.1.6.

Read the article
Define 2D array with loops in php

- by Michael

I have an array $rows where each element is a row of 15 tab-delimited values. I want to explode $rows into a 2D array $rowData where each row is an array element and each tab-delimited value is assigned to a different array element. I've tried these two methods without success. I know the first one has a coding error but I do not know how to correct it. Any help would be amazing. for ($i=0; $i<count($rows); $i++){ for ($j=0; $j<15; $j++){ $rowData = array([$i] => array (explode(" ", $rows[$j]))); } } foreach ($rows as $value){ $rowData = array( array (explode(" ", $rows[$value]))); }

Read the article
Convert complex numerical array to associative array [PHP]

- by user1500412

I have an array data that look like this : Array ( [0] => Array ( [0] => Name: [1] => John W. [2] => Registration ID: [3] => 36 ) [1] => Array ( [0] =>Age: [1] => 35 [2] => Height: [3] => 5'11" ) [3] => Array ( [0] => Sex: [1] => M [2] => Weight: [3] => 200lbs ) [4] => Array ( [0] => Address ) [5] => Array ( [0] => 6824 crestwood dr delphi, IN 46923 )) And I want to convert it to associative array like this : Array( ['Name']=> John W. ['Registration ID']=> 36 ['Age']=> 35 ['Height'] => 5'11'' ['Sex']=>M ['Weight']=>200lbs ['Address']=>6824 crestwood dr delphi, IN 46923 ) I have no idea at all how to do this, since the supposed to be array column header were also in sequence, so it makes difficult to convert this array. Any help I appreciate, thx.

Read the article
Can I choose a sparse file as vdev for a zfs pool?

- by Karl Richter

man zpool states that a vdev for a zfs pool can be a "regular file". Can I specify a sparse file (the warning about the integrity of the file being determined by the underlying filesystem should apply with the same relevance for a sparse file)? The ZFS administration guide on https://pthree.org/2012/12/04/zfs-administration-part-i-vdevs/ states that file vdevs "must be preallocated, and not sparse files or thin provisioned" (thanks to @jlliagre). On https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Experimenting_with_ZFS sparse files are used without any comment.

Read the article
Representing Sparse Data in PostgreSQL

- by Chris S

What's the best way to represent a sparse data matrix in PostgreSQL? The two obvious methods I see are: Store data in a single a table with a separate column for every conceivable feature (potentially millions), but with a default value of NULL for unused features. This is conceptually very simple, but I know that with most RDMS implementations, that this is typically very inefficient, since the NULL values ususually takes up some space. However, I read an article (can't find its link unfortunately) that claimed PG doesn't take up data for NULL values, making it better suited for storing sparse data. Create separate "row" and "column" tables, as well as an intermediate table to link them and store the value for the column at that row. I believe this is the more traditional RDMS solution, but there's more complexity and overhead associated with it. I also found PostgreDynamic, which claims to better support sparse data, but I don't want to switch my entire database server to a PG fork just for this feature. Are there any other solutions? Which one should I use?

Read the article
Learning about sparse columns and filtered indexes

- by Christian

I’ve been brushing up on sparse columns and filtered indexes recently and two resources stood out for me as indispensable so I’d thought I’d share them. Those of you studying for Microsoft Certified Master: SQL Server will no doubt have found the Readiness Videos published on TechNet and Kimberley Tripp’s (Blog|Twitter) webcast in this series on Sparse columns provides an excellent resource showing different schema designs and specifically where sparse columns fit in. MCM Readiness Video on Sparse columns by Kimberly Tripp http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sqlserver/ff977043 The second resource is a session from this years PASS Summit (2010) by Don Vilen (Twitter) called Filtered Indexes, Sparse Columns: Together, Separately (AD203). I thought this session was great and in combination with Kimberly’s webcast provides the perfect background for anyone wanting to learn this topic, especially for those studying for the MCM knowledge exam. If you attended PASS you should have a login to stream Don’s session but if not you can buy the official DVD’s from http://www.sqlpass.org The DVDs are worthy investment considering how much material you get access to! Regards, Christian Christian Bolton - MCA, MCM, MVP Technical Director http://coeo.com - SQL Server Consulting & Managed Services twitter: @christianbolton

Read the article
java: sparse bit vector

- by Jason S

Are there any well-known libraries in Java for sparse bit sets? (And are there guidelines for how sparse is useful to use them vs. java.util.BitSet?)

Read the article
Sparse linear program solver

- by Jacob

This great SO answer points to a good sparse solver, but I've got constraints on x (for Ax = b) such that each element in x is >=0 an <=N. The first thing which comes to mind is an LP solver for large sparse matrices. Any ideas/recommendations?

Read the article
Sparse checkouts and svn:externals

- by JesperE

I'm trying to do a sparse checkout of a folder containing externals, but none of the externals are being checked out. This issue seems to indicate that this behavior may be by design, or at least that it isn't clear what the behavior should be. From my point of view, the obvious behavior is that externals are treated just as any other directory, and checked out following the same sparse checkout rules. Is there a way to work around this except manually checking out the externals?

Read the article
Resize Array By Last and not by First in C#

- by Leen15

Hi all! I have an Array of Class elements, and by an int variable i need to resize this array to the last X elements. So for example i have an array with: Array[0] = Msg1 Array[1] = Msg2 Array[2] = Msg3 Array[3] = Msg4 Array[4] = Msg5 Array[5] = Msg6 Array[6] = Msg7 Array[7] = Msg8 Array[8] = Msg9 Array[9] = Msg10 and i need to have only the last 8 elements in the array. i cannot use the Array.Resize function because the result would be: Array[0] = Msg1 Array[1] = Msg2 Array[2] = Msg3 Array[3] = Msg4 Array[4] = Msg5 Array[5] = Msg6 Array[6] = Msg7 Array[7] = Msg8 and i need something like this: Array[0] = Msg3 Array[1] = Msg4 Array[2] = Msg5 Array[3] = Msg6 Array[4] = Msg7 Array[5] = Msg8 Array[6] = Msg9 Array[7] = Msg10 How can i do this? i hope my problem is clear. Thanks.

Read the article
Decode sparse json array to php array

- by Isaac Sutherland

I can create a sparse php array (or map) using the command: $myarray = array(10=>'hi','test20'=>'howdy'); I want to serialize/deserialize this as JSON. I can serialize it using the command: $json = json_encode($myarray); which results in the string {"10":"hi","test20":"howdy"}. However, when I deserialize this and cast it to an array using the command: $mynewarray = (array)json_decode($json); I seem to lose any mappings with keys which were not valid php identifiers. That is, mynewarray has mapping 'test20'=>'howdy', but not 10=>'hi' nor '10'=>'hi'. Is there a way to preserve the numerical keys in a php map when converting to and back from json using the standard json_encode / json_decode functions?

Read the article
how to do loop for array which have different data for each array

- by Suriani Salleh

i have this file XML file.. I need to convert it form XMl to MYSQL. if it have only one array than i know how to do it.. now my question how to extract this two array Each array will have different value of data..for example for first array, pmIntervalTxEthMaxUtilization data : 0,74,0,0,48 and for second array pmIntervalRxPowerLevel data: -79,-68,-52 , pmIntervalTxPowerLevel data: 13,11,-55 . can some one help to guide how write php code to extract this xml file to MY SQL <mi> <mts>20130618020000</mts> <gp>900</gp> <mt>pmIntervalRxUndersizedFrames</mt> [ this is first array] <mt>pmIntervalRxUnicastFrames</mt> <mt>pmIntervalTxUnicastFrames</mt> <mt>pmIntervalRxEthMaxUtilization</mt> <mt>pmIntervalTxEthMaxUtilization</mt> <mv> <moid>port:1:3:23-24</moid> <sf>FALSE</sf> <r>0</r> [the data for 1st array i want to insert in DB] <r>0</r> <r>0</r> <r>5</r> <r>0</r> </mv> </mi> <mi> <mts>20130618020000</mts> <gp>900</gp> <mt>pmIntervalRxSES</mt> [this is second array] <mt>pmIntervalRxPowerLevel</mt> <mt>pmIntervalTxPowerLevel</mt> <mv> <moid>client:1:3:23-24</moid> <sf>FALSE</sf> <r>0</r> [the data for 2nd array i want to insert in DB] <r>-79</r> <r>13</r> </mv> </mi> this is the code for one array that i write..i dont know how to write code for two array because the field appear two times and have different data value for each array // Loop through the specified xpath foreach($xml->mi->mv as $subchild) { $port_no = $subchild->moid; $rx_ses = $subchild->r[0]; $rx_es = $subchild->r[1]; $tx_power = $subchild->r[10]; // dump into database; ........................... i have do a little research on it this is the out come... $i = 0; while( $i < 5) { // Loop through the specified xpath foreach($xml->md->mi->mv as $subchild) { $port_no = $subchild->moid; $rx_uni = $subchild->r[10]; $tx_uni = $subchild->r[11]; $rx_eth = $subchild->r[16]; $tx_eth = $subchild->r[17]; // dump into database; .............................. $i++; if( $i == 5 )break; } } // Loop through the specified xpath foreach($xml->mi->mv as $subchild) { $port_no = $subchild->moid; $rx_ses = $subchild->r[0]; $rx_es = $subchild->r[1]; $tx_power = $subchild->r[10]; // dump into database; .......................

Read the article
How do I access data within this multidimensional array?

- by dmanexe

I have this array: $items_pool = Array ( [0] => Array ( [id] => 1 [quantity] => 1 ) [1] => Array ( [id] => 2 [quantity] => 1 ) [2] => Array ( [id] => 72 [quantity] => 6 ) [3] => Array ( [id] => 4 [quantity] => 1 ) [4] => Array ( [id] => 5 [quantity] => 1 ) [5] => Array ( [id] => 7 [quantity] => 1 ) [6] => Array ( [id] => 8 [quantity] => 1 ) [7] => Array ( [id] => 9 [quantity] => 1 ) [8] => Array ( [id] => 19 [quantity] => 1 ) [9] => Array ( [id] => 20 [quantity] => 1 ) [10] => Array ( [id] => 22 [quantity] => 1 ) [11] => Array ( [id] => 29 [quantity] => 0 ) ) I'm trying to loop through this array and perform a conditional based on $items_pool[][id]'s value. I want to then report back TRUE or NULL/FALSE, so I'm just testing the presence of to be specific.

Read the article
Adding array to an object breaks the array

- by DisgruntledGoat

I have an array like this (output from print_r): Array ( [price] => 700.00 [room_prices] => Array ( [0] => [1] => [2] => [3] => [4] => ) [bills] => Array ( [0] => Gas ) ) I'm running a custom function to convert it to an object. Only the top-level should be converted, the sub-arrays should stay as arrays. The output comes out like this: stdClass Object ( [price] => 700.00 [room_prices] => Array ( [0] => Array ) [bills] => Array ( [0] => Array ) ) Here is my conversion function. All it does is set the value of each array member to an object: function array_to_object( $arr ) { $obj = new stdClass; if ( count($arr) == 0 ) return $obj; foreach ( $arr as $k=>$v ) $obj->$k = $v; return $obj; } I can't figure this out for the life of me!

Read the article
Anyone Know a Great Sparse One Dimensional Array Library in Python?

- by TheJacobTaylor

I am working on an algorithm in Python that uses arrays heavily. The arrays are typically sparse and are read from and written to constantly. I am currently using relatively large native arrays and the performance is good but the memory usage is high (as expected). I would like to be able to have the array implementation not waste space for values that are not used and allow an index offset other than zero. As an example, if my numbers start at 1,000,000 I would like to be able to index my array starting at 1,000,000 and not be required to waste memory with a million unused values. Array reads and writes needs to be fast. Expanding into new territory can be a small delay but reads and writes should be O(1) if possible. Does anybody know of a library that can do it? Thanks!

Read the article
Vectorizatoin of index operation for a scipy.sparse matrix

- by celil

The following code runs too slowly even though everything seems to be vectorized. from numpy import * from scipy.sparse import * n = 100000; i = xrange(n); j = xrange(n); data = ones(n); A=csr_matrix((data,(i,j))); x = A[i,j] The problem seems to be that the indexing operation is implemented as a python function, and invoking A[i,j] results in the following profiling output 500033 function calls in 8.718 CPU seconds Ordered by: internal time ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall filename:lineno(function) 100000 7.933 0.000 8.156 0.000 csr.py:265(_get_single_element) 1 0.271 0.271 8.705 8.705 csr.py:177(__getitem__) (...) Namely, the python function _get_single_element gets called 100000 times which is really inefficient. Why isn't this implemented in pure C? Does anybody know of a way of getting around this limitation, and speeding up the above code? Should I be using a different sparse matrix type?

Read the article
Sparse checkout in Git 1.7.0?

- by davr

With the new sparse checkout feature in Git 1.7.0, is it possible to just get the contents of a subdirectory like how you can in SVN? I found this example, but it preserves the full directory structure. Imagine that I just wanted the contents of the 'perl' directory, without an actual directory named 'perl'. -- EDIT -- Example: My git repository contains the following paths repo/.git/ repo/perl/ repo/perl/script1.pl repo/perl/script2.pl repo/images/ repo/images/image1.jpg repo/images/image2.jpg repo/doc/ repo/doc/readme.txt repo/doc/help.txt What I want is to be able to produce from the above repository this layout: repo/.git/ repo/script1.pl repo/script2.pl However with the current sparse checkout feature, it seems like it is only possible to get repo/.git/ repo/perl/script1.pl repo/perl/script2.pl which is NOT what I want. Thanks.

Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | Next Page >